Submitted:
01 April 2026
Posted:
02 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design
2.2. Soybean Experimental
2.3. Tamani Experimental
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Soybean Experimental
3.2. Tamani Experimental
4. Discussion
4.1. Soybean Experimental
4.2. Tamani Experimental
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| BRD | Basalt rock dust |
| K | Potassium |
| m | Meter |
| m² | Square meters |
| N | Nitrogen |
| MTG | Represents the weight of one thousand soybean grains |
| CEC | Cation Exchange Capacity |
| P | Phosphorus |
| Ca | Calcium |
| DMP | Dry matter production |
| DM | dry matter |
| cm | Centimeters |
| mm | millimeter |
| ns | not significant |
References
- Palma, H. H.; Granados, A. I. N.; Neckel, A.; Osorio, D. P.; Ríos, A. L. M.; Ramos, C. G. Valorization of mineral by-products through soil remineralization enhances sustainable agriculture and circular economy outcomes. Discov. Sustain., 2025, v. 6, art. 1134. [CrossRef]
- Luchese, A. V.; Leite, I. J. G. C.; Giaretta, A. P. S.; Alves, M. L.; Pivetta, L. A.; Missio, R. F. Use of quarry waste basalt rock powder as a soil remineralizer to grow soybean and maize. Heliyon, 2023, v. 9, n. 3, art. e14050. [CrossRef]
- Assunção, S. G. S.; Silva, B. C.; Cruz, D. C.; Oliveira, M. F.; Brasil, E. P. F. Remineralizers in the Brazilian agricultural context. J. Agric. Sci. Res., 2024, v. 4, n. 11. [CrossRef]
- Swoboda, P.; Döring, T. F.; Hamer, M. Remineralizing soils? The agricultural usage of silicate rock powders: A review. Sci. Total Environ., 2022, v. 807, n. 150976, p. 150976.
- Benevides Filho, P. R. R.; Blaskowski, A. E.; Ramos, M. N.; Lessa, L. G. F.; Zamberlan Filho, A. N.; Abreu-Junior, C. H.; Jani, A. D.; Capra, G. F.; Nogueira, T. A. R. Potential soil remineralizers from silicate rock powders (SRP) as alternative sources of nutrients for agricultural production (Amazon Region). Minerals, 2023, v. 13, art. 1255. [CrossRef]
- BRASIL. Instrução Normativa Nº 5, de 10 de março de 2016. Ficam estabelecidas as regras sobre definições, classificação, especificações e garantias, tolerâncias, registro, embalagem, rotulagem e propaganda dos remineralizadores e substratos para plantas, destinados à agricultura. Brasília, DF: Diário Oficial da União, 2016.
- Medeiros, F. P.; Theodoro, S. H.; Carvalho, A. M. X.; Oliveira, V. S.; Oliveira, L. C.; Almeida, R. M. P.; Viana, M. B.; Gomide, C. S. The combination of crushed rock and organic matter enhances the capture of inorganic carbon in tropical soils. J. S. Am. Earth Sci., 2023, v. 152, art. 105254. [CrossRef]
- Manning, D. A. C.; Theodoro, S. H. Enabling food security through use of local rocks and minerals. Extr. Ind. Soc., 2020, v. 7, n. 2, p. 480–487. [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, M. C.; Martins, A. R.; Alves, R. S.; Lessa, L. G. F.; Pereira, H. S.; Galindo, F. S.; Teixeira Filho, M. C. M.; Abreu-Junior, C. H.; Jani, A. D.; Capra, G. F.; Ganga, A.; Nogueira, T. A. R. Basalt rock dust as a soil remineralizer in upland rice grown in tropical soils: residual effects on soil fertility, Si availability, and leaf anatomy. J. Clean. Prod., 2025, v. 520, art. 146063. [CrossRef]
- Ramos, C. G.; Santos de Medeiros, D.; Gómez, L. A.; Oliveira, M. L. S.; Schneider, I. A. H.; Kautzmann, R. M.; Silva, L. F. O. Avaliação do remineralizador de solo a partir de subproduto da mineração de rochas vulcânicas: prova experimental utilizando aveia preta e cultura do milho. Nat Resour Res, 2020, 29, 1583-1600.
- Bastos, T. X.; Silva, G. F. G.; Pacheco, N. A.; Figueiredo, R. O. Informações agroclimáticas do município de Paragominas para o planejamento agrícola. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE METEOROLOGIA, 14., 2006, Florianópolis. Anais... Florianópolis: SBMET, 2006.
- Rodrigues, T. E.; Santos, P. L. Dos; Valente, M. A.; Rego, R. S.; Gama, J. R. N. F.; Silva, J. M. L. Da; Santos, E. Da S.; Rollim, P. A. M. Zoneamento agroecológico do Município de Paragominas, Estado do Pará. Belém: Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, 1999. 64 p.
- SOESP—Sementes do Oeste Paulista. Panicum maximum cv. BRS Tamani. Avaliable at: http://www.sementesoesp.com.br/produto.php?idprod=21. Acesso em:17/02/2026.
- Oliveira, R. L.; Andrade, N.; Freitas, C. C. G.; Oliveira, A. M. S.; Silva, D. F.; Vieira, M. S.; Mendonça, R. S.; Barros, F. M. R.; Azevedo, A. C.; Andreote, F. D. Rock powder type and soil texture shape microbial community shifts and plant biomass responses in highly weathered tropical soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2025, v 215. 106489. [CrossRef]
- Sandeep, C. S.; He, H.; Senetakis, K. Experimental and analytical studies on the influence of weathering degree and ground-environment analog conditions on the tribological behavior of granite. Eng. Geol. 2022, 304. 106644. [CrossRef]
- Plata, L. G.; Ramos, C. G.; Oliveira, M. L. S.; Oliveira, L. F. S. Release kinetics of multi-nutrients from volcanic rock mining by-products: Evidences for their use as a soil remineralizer. J. Clean. Prod., 2021, v. 279, art. 123668. [CrossRef]
- MAPA—Ministério da agricultura, pecuária e abastecimento. Instrução Normativa Nº 5 and 6. Brasília: MAPA/ SDA/CGAL, 2016.
- Dalmora, A.C.; Ramos, C.G.; Plata, L.G.; Costa, M.L.; Kautzmann, R.M.; Silva, L.F.O. Understanding the mobility of potential nutrients in rock mining byproducts: An opportunity for more ssustainable agriculture and mining. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, v. 70, 136240.
- Ramos, C. G.; Querol, X.; Dalmora, A. C.; Pires, K. C. J.; Schneider, I. A. H.; Oliveira, L. F. S.; Kautzmann, R. M. Evaluation of the potential of volcanic rock waste from southern Brazil as a natural soil fertilizer. J. Clean. Prod., 2017, v. 142, pt. 4, p. 2700–2706. [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, I. D. A.; Volpiano, C. G.; Vargas, L. K.; Granada, C. E.; Lisboa, B. B.; Passaglia, L. M. P. Use of mineral weathering bacteria to enhance nutrient availability in crops: A review. Front. Plant Sci., 2020, v. 11, art. 590774. [CrossRef]
- Martins, E.S.; Martins, E.S.; Hardoim, P.R. Princípios geoquímicos, mineralógicos e biológicos do manejo de remineralizadores de solo. Inf. Agropecu., 2023, v.44, n.321, p.26-39.
- Medeiros, D.S.; Sanchotene, D.M.; Ramos, C.G.; Oliveira, L.F.S.; Sampaio, C.H.; Kautzmann, R.M. Soybean crops cultivate with dacite rock by-produtct: A proof of a cleaner technology to soil remineralization. J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2021, v. 9 106742.
- CONAB. Companhia Nacional De Abastecimento. Série histórica das safras. Avaliable at: https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/serie-historica-das-safras. Accessed: 03 april. 2025.
- Cravo, M. S.; Brasil, E. C.; Costa Netto, J. R.; Silveira Filho, A.; Elhusny, J. C. Soja. In: Brasil, E.C.; Cravo, M.S.; Viegas, I.J.M. Recomendações de calagem e adubação para o Estado do Pará. 2nd ed., Brasília, Brazil, Embrapa, 2020.
- Soratto, R. P.; Crusciol, C. A. C.; Campos, M.; Gilabel, A.P.; Costa, C. H. M.; Castro, G. S. A.; Ferrari Neto, J. Eficiência e efeito residual de fontes alternativas de potássio em culturas de grãos. Pesq. Agropecu. Bras., 2022, v. 56 (Y), e02686. [CrossRef]
- Jank, L.; Santos, M. F. Capim-BRS Tamani (Panicum maximum Jacq.) híbrido de maior qualidade, porte baixo e fácil manejo. Brasília, Brazil, Embrapa, 2021.
- Van Straaten, P. Farming with rocks and minerals: challenges and opportunities. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc., 2006, v. 78, p. 731-747.

| Chemical characterization (%) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | TiO2 | P2O5 | Na2O | K2O | MnO |
| 73.7 | 15.4 | 1.6 | 0.63 | 0.26 | 0.14 | 0.342 | 3.61 | 5.03 | 0.03 |
| Predominant minerals | |||||||||
| Quartz—SiO2 Albite—(Na,Ca)AlSi3O8 Microcline—KAl Si3O8 | |||||||||
| Physical characterization | |||||||||
| > 2.00 mm | > 0.84 mm | > 0.30 mm | <0.30 mm | ||||||
| 182 g (32.5%) | 285 g (51%) | 78 g (14%) | 14 g (2.5%) | ||||||
| pH | P* | S | K | Ca | Mg | Al | H+Al | CEC | MO |
| CaCl2 | mg dm-3 | mmolc dm-3 | g dm-3 | ||||||
| Soybean crop | |||||||||
| 5 | 24.2 | 8 | 2.46 | 29.1 | 10 | 0 | 31.5 | 73.1 | 24.7 |
| Tamani crop | |||||||||
| 5.4 | 4 | 11 | 2.3 | 32 | 10 | 0.02 | 22 | 66.3 | 34 |
| Levels | Soybean crops 2020/2021 | Soybean crops 2021/2022 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | MTG | Yield | MTG | |
| kg ha-1 | kg ha-1 | g | kg ha-1 | g |
| 0 | 2581.7 | 160.02 | 2269.9 | 159.54 |
| 1000 | 2794.0 | 160.14 | 2429.8 | 154.74 |
| 2000 | 2430.9 | 160.16 | 2435.9 | 158.12 |
| 3000 | 2612.8 | 160.32 | 2173.6 | 159.90 |
| 6000 | 2581.9 | 160.36 | 2364.3 | 161.22 |
| CV (%) | 3.6 | 3.7 | 17.8 | 5.7 |
| P value | 0.4770 | 0.7260 | 0.8597 | 0.8885 |
| Soybean crop 2019/2020 | ||||||||||
| Parameters | Levels of byproduct of granite mining (kg ha-1) | CV(%) | p valor | Equation | R² | |||||
| 0 | 1000 | 2000 | 3000 | 6000 | ||||||
| pH | CaCl2 | 4.84 | 4.74 | 5.1 | 4.86 | 4.66 | 5.2 | 0.0641 | ns* | ns* |
| P† | mg dm-3 | 21.4 | 24.2 | 21.0 | 23.4 | 27 | 31.1 | 0.7326 | ns* | ns* |
| K | mmolc dm-3 | 2.34 | 2.36 | 2.82 | 2.76 | 3.14 | 16.8 | 0.0286* | y = 0.0001x + 2.3543 | 0.8781 |
| Ca | mmolc dm-3 | 17.2 | 12.6 | 19.2 | 13.6 | 10.2 | 32.9 | 0.0147** | y = -0.001x + 17.019 | 0.4257 |
| Mg | mmolc dm-3 | 4.2 | 5.2 | 7.2 | 5.0 | 3.4 | 31.1 | 0.0001** | y = -0.0002x+5566 | 0.1459 |
| Al | mmolc dm-3 | 2.0 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 3.2 | 4.5 | 66.8 | 0.0134* | y = 0.0003x + 2.4981 | 0.2470 |
| H+Al | mmolc dm-3 | 29.8 | 31.9 | 28.4 | 28.0 | 29.8 | 8.0 | 0.0525 | ns* | ns* |
| CEC | mmolc dm-3 | 53.6 | 52.0 | 57.8 | 49.6 | 46.6 | 10.3 | 0.0088** | y = -0.0013x + 54.981 | 0.4852 |
| M.O. | g dm-3 | 21.0 | 21.7 | 22.1 | 20.5 | 20.2 | 5.1 | 0.0127* | y = -0.0002x + 21.621 | 0.3930 |
| Soybean crop 2020/2021 | ||||||||||
| Parameters | Levels of byproduct of granite mining (kg ha-1) | CV(%) | p valor | Equation | R² | |||||
| 0 | 1000 | 2000 | 3000 | 6000 | ||||||
| pH | CaCl2 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.32 | 5.34 | 3.08 | 0.0005* | y = -2E-08x² + 0.0001x + 5.1699 | 0.5539 |
| P† | mg dm-3 | 7.0 | 7.6 | 10.0 | 8.6 | 6.6 | 23.1 | 0.0129* | y = -3E-07x² + 0.0016x + 6.8942 | 0.7610 |
| K | mmolc dm-3 | 2.04 | 3.86 | 2.72 | 2.76 | 2.00 | 35.2 | 0.006** | y = -9E-08x² + 0.0004x + 2.5202 | 0.3873 |
| Ca | mmolc dm-3 | 27.0 | 35.6 | 35.8 | 37.2 | 41.4 | 22.7 | 0.011* | y = 0.002x + 30.6 | 0.7709 |
| Mg | mmolc dm-3 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 8.4 | 7.4 | 14.6 | 0.0681 | ns* | ns* |
| Al | mmolc dm-3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ns | ns* | ns* |
| H+Al | mmolc dm-3 | 32.8 | 26.6 | 30.0 | 35.4 | 32.8 | 19.2 | 0.181 | ns* | ns* |
| CEC | mmolc dm-3 | 70.2 | 75.0 | 77.6 | 83.6 | 83.6 | 14.2 | 0.2002 | ns* | ns* |
| M.O. | g dm-3 | 19.6 | 21.4 | 23.0 | 24.0 | 22.8 | 16.6 | 0.2429 | ns* | ns* |
| Levels of byproduct of granite mining (kg ha-1) | 2020/2021 | 2021/2022 | ||
| DMP | DM | DMP | DM | |
| kg ha-1 | % | kg ha-1 | % | |
| 0 | 2772.2 | 21.4 | 2121.9 | 25.3 |
| 1000 | 3193.0 | 21.1 | 2044.0 | 25.7 |
| 2000 | 2995.1 | 20.9 | 2247.8 | 24.6 |
| 3000 | 2950.2 | 20.4 | 2105.1 | 25.4 |
| 6000 | 2448.5 | 21.7 | 2163.0 | 25.4 |
| CV (%) | 30.23 | 10.1 | 31.8 | 18.7 |
| P value | 0.015 | 0.3211 | 0.6974 | 0.5612 |
| Levels of byproduct of granite mining (kg ha-1) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil Fertility | 0 | 1000 | 2000 | 3000 | 6000 | CV(%) | p value | |
| Parameter | 12 months after Tamani sowing (2020-2021) | |||||||
| pH | CaCl2 | 5.54 | 5.34 | 5.62 | 5.4 | 5.54 | 4.8 | 0.388 |
| P* | mg dm-3 | 32 | 35.2 | 33.8 | 27.2 | 33.8 | 32.1 | 0.9063 |
| S | mg dm-3 | 13 | 13.8 | 11.8 | 12.4 | 12.6 | 22.6 | 0.8733 |
| K | mmolc dm-3 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2 | 21.3 | 0.6335 |
| Ca | mmolc dm-3 | 30.4 | 27.4 | 32 | 28.6 | 30 | 18.8 | 0.2455 |
| Mg | mmolc dm-3 | 10.6 | 9.2 | 11.2 | 9.6 | 10 | 12.8 | 0.115 |
| H+Al | mmolc dm-3 | 27 | 23.6 | 24 | 23.6 | 22.8 | 24.7 | 0.8881 |
| CEC | mmolc dm-3 | 69.8 | 62.2 | 68.8 | 64.2 | 65.2 | 12.5 | 0.407 |
| O.M. | g dm-3 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.64 | 1.66 | 1.58 | 12.9 | 0.6826 |
| Residual period (12 to 24 months) after Tamani sowing (2021-2022) | ||||||||
| pH | CaCl2 | 5.54 | 5.5 | 5.44 | 5.48 | 5.44 | 3.4 | 0.9104 |
| P* | mg dm-3 | 6.4 | 8.2 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 5.8 | 37.3 | 0.8867 |
| S | mg dm-3 | 4.8 | 6.2 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 50.4 | 0.3202 |
| K | mmolc dm-3 | 2.6 | 2.46 | 2.92 | 2.54 | 2.6 | 27.4 | 0.8891 |
| Ca | mmolc dm-3 | 42.8 | 41.2 | 40.4 | 41 | 40.6 | 23.2 | 0.9628 |
| Mg | mmolc dm-3 | 11.4 | 10.2 | 10.8 | 10.6 | 10.4 | 17.7 | 0.8068 |
| H+Al | mmolc dm-3 | 25 | 25.2 | 24.6 | 28.8 | 29.4 | 14.8 | 0.1795 |
| CEC | mmolc dm-3 | 56.8 | 53.8 | 54.4 | 54.2 | 53.4 | 19.9 | 0.973 |
| O.M. | g dm-3 | 2.96 | 3.04 | 3.16 | 3.14 | 3.3 | 16.5 | 0.6853 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.