Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Astro-Versus Microglia-Enriched Transcriptomes from Aged Atxn2-CAG100-knockin Mice Suggest Underlying Pathology of RNA Processing at Ribosomes, and Possibly at U-Bodies

Submitted:

02 March 2026

Posted:

03 March 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 2 (SCA2) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis type 13 (ALS13) are triggered by polyglutamine expansion in Ataxin-2 (ATXN2). To understand these neurodegenerative disorders at the molecular level, the brains of 10-month-old Atxn2-CAG100-knockin mice were analyzed as microglial, astroglial and neuronal fractions via global RNA sequencing. Data were validated by comparison with spinal cord oligonucleotide microarray profile. Here, glial fractions showed upregulation of Gpnmb (to 2082%), Cst7, Clec7a, Axl, Csf1, Lgals3, Lgals3bp, Slc11a1, and Usp18 as an unspecific neuroinflammatory signature, versus downregulation of axonal Nefh (to <19%), and synaptic Scn4b, Camk2b, Rab15, and Grin1 mRNAs correlating with circuit disconnection. In all fractions, reductions of Kif5a, Rph3a, and Cplx1 were noted, versus disease-specific inductions of ribosomal subunits, presumably mirroring the partial loss-of-function of ATXN2 as RNA translation modulator. Selective accumulations of embryonic factors Rnu1b2 and Eef1a1 versus downregulation of adult Eef1a2, specify mutation impact on splicing and translation elongation. As a potential underpinning of toxic gain-of-functions, the proteostasis transcript Rnf213 appeared increased in astroglial and microglial fractions. These transcriptome data suggest altered ribosomal and spliceosome machinery, with massive microgliosis versus mild astrogliosis, at the core of SCA2 and ALS13.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Our research on molecular mechanisms in neurodegenerative disorders is focused on a rare disease named Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 2 (SCA2), which is caused by a CAG repead expansion with autosomal dominant inheritance and occurs world-wide [1,2,3,4]. This entity was first described in India [5] and the further definition of its characteristic features was pioneered in a large Cuban founder population [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21], as well as in Japan, India, Europe, the USA, and China [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Three teams in parallel identified Ataxin-2 (ATXN2) as the responsible disease protein, demonstrating that unstable expansions of its poly-glutamine (polyQ) domain from the normal size of 22 (or 23) to >33 residues represent the causal event that triggers this multi-system atrophy [47,48,49].
Intermediate size expansions in the polyQ domain of ATXN2 do not have the strength to cause monogenic disease, but at lengths perhaps from 27Q, and certainly from 31Q until 33Q render motor neurons of the spinal cord and the brain cortex more vulnerable to manifestation of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) at adult ages [50,51,52,53,54]. The pathogenesis involving intermediate-sized polyQ expansions in ATXN2 has been named ALS type 13 (see https://omim.org/entry/601517, last accessed on Jan 25, 2026).
ATXN2 is a large protein with sizes between 600 and 1300 amino acids, which evolved during the time when early eukaryotic life had sustained exposure to oxidative stress from endosymbionts, surrounding them with protective double membranes [55]. Thus, its functions were necessary for all fungi, insects, animals, and plants across evolution, but remain to be understood. All orthologs and paralogs of the protein family across evolution share a characteristic order of a N-terminal Like-Sm (LSm) domain containing 5 beta-barrels, followed by a LSm-associated domain (LSmAD) with some alpha-helix structures, and at about 3/5 of the protein length the linear PABP-interacting motif 2 (PAM2) (in plants also known as CID) motif [56,57,58,59], with all of these conserved sequences being surrounded by intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) of relatively high variability [55,60,61]. The LSm and PAM2 sequences are also found in other protein families, while the LSmAD seems specific for the Ataxin-2 gene family and has the strongest sequence conservation. RNA association is known to occur directly for the LSm domain [62], indirectly somewhere between LSm and LSmAD via the RNA helicase DDX6 [63,64], and indirectly via the poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) for the PAM2 motif [60,65], while the function of LSmAD remains to be understood. Although the interaction with poly(A) tails of mRNAs clearly indicates a role of ATXN2 for coding transcripts, extensive mRNA profiling efforts in diverse organisms were unable to define individual transcripts affected by ATXN2 polyQ expansions with consistency across different tissues.
Gene duplication events occurred independently when organisms moved from protected freshwater environments to enhanced stress exposures during terrestrial life. In all animals since chordate development (except flying birds), ATXN2 coexists with its duplicated shorter homolog ATXN2L, which shows even stronger expression. LSm / LSmAD / PAM2 deletions in ATXN2L were shown to interfere with mouse embryonic development, similar to the essential role of single-copy Ataxin-2 for the development of nematodes, flies and yeast, while targeted deletion of the N-terminal IDR1 with the polyQ domain of ATXN2 in mice produced only mild phenotypes with adult progressive obesity, high blood fats, insulin resistance, locomotor hyperactivity and subtly altered ribosomal translation efficiency [66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87]. An independent gene duplication event in the evolution of pioneer terrestrial plants with enhanced stress exposure, such as Amborella shrub and Araucaria conifer monocots [55], produced Ataxin-2 orthologs that were named CID3 and CID4, but apparently failed to develop distinguishing sequence features, and play enigmatic roles for development [88]. Clearly, a necessity of Ataxin-2 for cellular stress responses and RNA quality control was documented in multiple species across evolution, and its re-localization in stress periods from ribosomes to stress granules for RNA triage (and somewhat to P-bodies where RNA degradation occurs) is its characteristic feature upon microscopic analyses in cells before and during oxidative stress [63,81,83,84,89,90,91,92,93,94]. During normal cellular growth, the experimental manipulation of the Ataxin-2 orthologs, e.g. in flies, documented its association with the ribosomal translation machinery. However, Ataxin-2 mutations also prominently affect the actin cytoskeleton, and this phenotype is not understood at a mechanistic level until today [56,85,95].
Previous PAR-CLIP studies in human HEK293T cells showed that ATXN2 binds directly to AU-rich sequences in the 3′ ends of mRNAs, while luciferase assays in HEK293T and SH-SY5Y cells demonstrated reduced protein expression in the presence of ATXN2-Q31 and ATXN2-Q39 expansions [62]. The analysis of Drosophila melanogaster Atx2 mutant brain homogenates confirmed this binding selectivity and showed decreased levels of Atx2-target mRNAs in post-mitotic neurons upon Atx2 knockdown [96,97]. Beyond the role of Ataxin-2 family members for mRNA processing, spurious findings by RNA sequencing technologies in mice, flies, and plants also suggested some dysregulation of microRNA [77,88,98,99], without clear consistencies or a detailed understanding of the mechanism involved.
In our current study, we employed aged mouse brains to generate cell-type enriched fractions using equipment and reagents from the company Miltenyi Biotech. To have maximal mutation effects, a Q100 domain encoded by a pure CAG100 expansion was substituted for the physiological single Q residue in mouse ATXN2 by targeted knockin technology [100]. This mouse mutant was previously shown to model the spatio-temporal SCA2/ALS13 pattern of neurodegeneration and locomotor behavior deficits with several pathology aspects in peripheral tissues in an authentic manner [100,101]. The RNA-yields from neuronal fractions turned out to be insufficient for standard RNA-seq analyses, but the comparison of compound KINvsWT data with individual data from astroglial KINvsWT and microglial KINvsWT permitted stringent data filtering based on consistency criteria. Overall, a prominent impact of ATXN2 polyQ expansion on ribosomal translation was elucidated, with the exploratory data pointing to an impairment of the translation elongation step. Furthermore, an impact of the mutation on RNA processing, involving non-coding small RNAs, was documented, and preliminary insights regarding a plausible mechanism were identified.

2. Results

To understand and characterize the diseases SCA2 and ALS13 in different cell populations of the central nervous system, the Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mouse was used to isolate microglia, astrocytes, and neuron fractions from the whole mouse brain. This study aimed to obtain insights into the contribution of various cell types in pathology and to enable insights into aberrant RNA processing, via the RNA-seq approach rather than previously employed oligonucleotide microarrays, and to assess small RNA species (e.g. tRNAs and microRNAs).

2.1. Isolation of Murine Brain Cell Types Using MACS Technology

Overall, brain dissociation followed the procedure described by [102] to isolate several cell types from a single mouse brain. Brains were dissected and collected in ice-cold DPBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+, then chopped into eight pieces and placed in gentleMACS C-tubes. Mechanical dissociation was performed with the Adult Brain Dissociation Kit (mouse and rat) and the 37C_ABDK_01 program of the gentleMACS Octo Dissociator with Heaters.
After dissociation, debris removal, and red blood cell lysis, cells were magnetically labelled and isolated using MACS technology as follows: (i) Microglia with anti-CD11b MicroBeads (positive selection), (ii) astrocytes with anti-ACSA-2 MicroBeads (positive selection), and (iii) neurons with a non-neuronal cell biotin-antibody cocktail followed by anti-biotin MicroBeads (negative selection).
Figure 1. Schematic workflow for adult brain dissociation and sequential isolation of cell types (microglia, astrocytes, and neurons). Tissue is harvested rapidly, placed in ice-cold DPBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+, and cut into small pieces, then transferred to C-tubes and dissociated by a combination of enzymatic buffer solution containing papain with gentle mechanical dissociation, using a gentleMACS Octo Dissociator with heaters. Gradient centrifugation forms a compact ring containing debris (dead cells and myelin). After debris removal, red blood cells are lysed, and the dissociated cells are magnetically labelled with anti-CD11b MicroBeads against microglia. The labelled cells are passed through LS columns twice and placed on a magnetic stand. CD11b-positively selected cells remain in the column and are eluted with a plunger into a fresh tube. The negative flow-through is processed to isolate astrocytes labelled with anti-ACSA2 MicroBeads, and the process is repeated. For neuron isolation, the negative flow-through from astrocyte extraction is labelled with a non-neuronal biotin cocktail and anti-biotin MicroBeads, and the subsequent negative flow-through contains the neuron population. Image created in BioRender, Reddy, A. (2026) https://BioRender.com/mj9rqid and adapted from [102].
Figure 1. Schematic workflow for adult brain dissociation and sequential isolation of cell types (microglia, astrocytes, and neurons). Tissue is harvested rapidly, placed in ice-cold DPBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+, and cut into small pieces, then transferred to C-tubes and dissociated by a combination of enzymatic buffer solution containing papain with gentle mechanical dissociation, using a gentleMACS Octo Dissociator with heaters. Gradient centrifugation forms a compact ring containing debris (dead cells and myelin). After debris removal, red blood cells are lysed, and the dissociated cells are magnetically labelled with anti-CD11b MicroBeads against microglia. The labelled cells are passed through LS columns twice and placed on a magnetic stand. CD11b-positively selected cells remain in the column and are eluted with a plunger into a fresh tube. The negative flow-through is processed to isolate astrocytes labelled with anti-ACSA2 MicroBeads, and the process is repeated. For neuron isolation, the negative flow-through from astrocyte extraction is labelled with a non-neuronal biotin cocktail and anti-biotin MicroBeads, and the subsequent negative flow-through contains the neuron population. Image created in BioRender, Reddy, A. (2026) https://BioRender.com/mj9rqid and adapted from [102].
Preprints 201069 g001
Initial trials showed high endothelial cell contamination in the neuron population. To resolve this, anti-CD31b MicroBeads were added alongside anti-biotin MicroBeads before magnetic separation, significantly improving neuron purity.

2.2. The Impact of the Atxn2-CAG100-KIN Mutation on the Brain and Its Cell Types

After establishing and validating the protocol by RT-qPCR (Suppl. Figure S1) and immunocytochemistry, we isolated microglia, astrocytes, and neurons from three wildtype (WT) and three approximately 10-month-old Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mutant-WT pairs to identify dysregulated molecules in different cell types due to SCA2 pathology.
At the age of 10 months, Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mutant brains showed significant weight reduction, averaging 350 mg compared to the wild-type average of 450 mg, consistent with previous findings regarding the severe cerebellar and moderate cortical atrophy [100] (Figure 2A). Post-isolated individual cells had 92% viable single-cell suspension. An average of 444,000 microglia, 419,667 astrocytes, and 23,666 neurons were obtained. Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mutants had significantly higher numbers of microglia and astrocytes, averaging 981,333 cells/ml and 1.03 million cells/ml, respectively (Figure 2B), in good agreement with the reactive microgliosis and astrogliosis expected during a neurodegenerative process with loss of neuronal processes. No difference in neuronal cell numbers was observed.
Upon RT-qPCR quality control analyses of purity in fractions from the 10-month-old brains, the factors studied included microglia markers (Aif1, Tmem119), an astrocyte marker (Gfap), a neuron marker (Map2), endothelial cell markers (Cldn5, Cd31), an oligodendrocyte marker (Olig2), and a pericyte marker (Kcnj8) (Figure S1).

2.3. Further Purity Analyses of Isolated Individual Brain Cell Types

Given that microglia have the physiological function to prune synapses and protect them from injury [103,104,105], mechanically disconnected synapses will co-purify with microglia. Similarly, astrocytes function to surround and protect synapses as well as Ranvier nodes from pulsating blood vessels, modulating the morphology of synapses, axons, and dendrites [106,107,108], so astrocytes will also co-sediment with severed neural projections. Finally, it is known that the non-labelled flow-through cells will not only contain neurons, but also endothelial cells [109]. Therefore, the purity of the isolated cell populations was further assessed by analyzing the expression of a complementary set of specific marker mRNAs in the RNA-seq output from 10-month-old brains as violin plots (Suppl. Material S1 and Figure 3A). Here, Aqp4 and Fgfr3 were documented as astroglia (as well as radial glia and ependymal cells) markers, Aif1 and Tmem119 as microglia markers, Tubb3 as neuronal differentiation marker, Gad1 as interneuron marker, Olig2 as oligodendroglia marker, Cldn5 as endothelial marker, Rgs5 as pericyte marker.
Microglia and neuron populations were approximately 90% pure; however, in the astrocyte population, there was a minor presence of Map2, Cldn5, Olig2, and Kcnj8. Importantly, data from brainrnaseq.org (last accessed on 5. February 2026) indicates that these latter transcripts exhibit mild expressions in astrocytes, which could explain their appearance in the RT-qPCR results [110].
Immunocytochemistry was performed to further validate the isolated cells on a cytological level. 3-day-old pups were used for cultivation (Figure 3B), since cells from 10-month-old mice showed reduced survivability. All cells were plated in a 24-well plate with the following seeding density: microglia at 2×105 cells/well, astrocytes and neurons at 3×105 cells/well. All isolated cells survived in culture for ~7 days post-isolation and seeding. However, the morphology and growth were best at two days for microglia and five days for astrocytes and neurons. IBA1, GFAP, and MAP2 antibodies were used for microglia, astrocytes, and neurons, respectively, in immunofluorescence staining (Figure 3C). All isolated cell types showed a cell-type-specific morphology and cellular marker expression.

2.4. Global Volcano Plots of RNA-seq Profiles, as well as Consistency Between New RNA-seq Transcript Analysis and Previous Oligonucleotide Microarray Data Document Loss of mRNA in Synapses and Neurites from Glial Fractions, with an Elevated Neuroinflammation Signature

The extraction of RNA yielded sufficient amounts in astroglial and microglial fractions, but lower amounts in the neuronal fraction (Table S1) made it impossible to use the standard RNA-seq protocol. Therefore, sequencing libraries of all fractions were prepared using the highly sensitive MACE-Seq protocol with the inclusion of additional rRNA depletion and polyadenylation steps. In this manner, the expression in the neuronal fraction was quantifiable for 12,000 genes, due to the low cell number and RNA amount there. While the data are therefore comparable among all fractions, only the more abundant neuronal transcripts may reveal consistency with glial transcripts.
In general, the assessment confirmed the high quality of data, with a quantitative detection of 21,375 transcripts (isoforms of 16,387 genes) in the different fractions. Relevant quality control steps for each fraction involved FastQC 0.11.9 and MultiQC 1.32, including Principal Component Analyses (Figure 4) as well as heatmaps showing Pearson Correlation Coefficients based on expression of the top 500 genes among all samples, boxplots of Cook’s distances from DESeq2 analysis to illustrate the distributions of values across samples, and dispersion plots from DESeq2 analysis to show gene-wise, fitted, and final dispersion estimates (Suppl. Materials S1 and S2).
Within each cell type, WT and KIN samples formed distinct but closely related subclusters (Figure 4), suggesting genotype-dependent transcriptional alterations that are smaller in magnitude compared to cell type–specific differences. Importantly, biological replicates clustered tightly together, demonstrating high data consistency and experimental reproducibility.
As documented by global Volcano plots (Figure 5), decreased mRNA levels dominated in all fractions. Mainly the microglial fraction showed strong upregulations. The differential expression analysis across all KIN fractions as DESeq2 aggregate, with subsequent GSEA documentation of enriched pathways, highlighted the “transmission across chemical synapses” in the Reactome database, “voltage-gated channel activity” among GO-MF terms, “regulated exocytosis” among GO-BP terms, and “synaptic membrane” among GO-CC terms, as prominently downregulated mRNA clusters (Suppl. Material S1).
To filter the crucial data that are reproducible (independent of the transcriptomic techniques used) and are correlates of the disease process (independent of the region of the nervous system under analysis), all novel RNA-seq transcript data from 10-month-old brain fractions with dysregulations of nominal significance were compared to all previously documented [101] dysregulations of nominal significance in 14-month-old spinal cord Affymetrix Clariom D oligonucleotide microarray data. It is important to note that the unstable repeat in Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice is continuously expanding over successive generations since the generation of this mutant [100], and ever earlier onset of locomotor deficits was observed. It is also relevant that the spinal cord is affected earlier in SCA2 than the cerebellum and much earlier than the rest of the brain. Thus, both datasets were selected to represent disease-relevant stages rather than strictly age- or tissue-matched conditions. It must be considered, that the spinal cord consists of many neuronal projections with myelination but relatively few neurons, resulting in a transcriptional profile that differs significantly from that of the brain. Consequently, this comparison of both approaches may identify the dysregulation of crucial molecules that are invariably associated with the SCA2/ALS13 disease process in any neuro-glial tissue. Initial assessment of markers for specific compartments among the new RNA-seq transcript isoform profiles may provide a notion about data consistency and also about the severity of the disease process at the age under analysis. Firstly, neuronal loss was substantial with reduced levels for the dendrite marker Map1b (log2FC -1.70 in astroglial, and -1.60 in microglial fraction), axonal marker Nefl (log2FC -0.65 and -0.30, respectively), neuronal soma marker Eno2 (log2FC -1.37 and -1.17), neuronal nucleus marker Rbfox3 (encoding NeuN, log2FC -0.50 and -0.12), glutamatergic neuron marker Slc17a7 (log2FC -1.85 and -0.65), glutamatergic neuron marker Gls (log2FC -0.33 and -0.003), glutamatergic neuron marker Grin1 (log2FC -0.55 and -0.37), GABAergic interneuron markers Gad1 (log2FC -0.42 and -0.08) and Gad2 (log2FC -0.33 in astroglial fraction), glutamatergic neuron marker Neurod2 (log2FC -0.50 in astroglial fraction) and interneuron marker Pvalb (log2FC -0.21 in astroglial fraction). Secondly, reactive astrogliosis was not conspicuous, with astrocyte marker Gfap showing almost normal levels (log2FC 0.33 without significance in astroglial fraction), astrocyte markers Vim (log2FC 1.05 and 0.005, respectively) and S100b (log2FC 0.59 and 0.01) showing significant upregulations, but astrocyte markers Aldh1l1 (log2FC -0.50 in astroglial fraction), Slc1a2 (log2FC -1.27 in astroglial fraction), and Aqp4 (log2FC -0.47) showing significant downregulations. Thirdly, reactive microgliosis markers Aif1 and Trem2 were unchanged, constitutive microglia markers Tmem119, P2ry12, Sall1, Olfml3, Hexb, Fcrls, Spi1, Cx3cr1 were unchanged, while Tyrobp exhibited a statistical trend towards upregulation (log2FC 0.02 in microglial fraction), Cd68 showed a slight significant upregulation (log2FC 0.02 in microglial fraction). Importantly, selected known microglia factors like Clec7a and Apoe showed massive and strongly significant upregulations that are detailed below. A significantly reduced expression of the disease gene Atxn2 with the CAG-repeat expansion was documented only in the microglial fraction (log2FC -0.03).
Among the consistent downregulations (Table 1A), the strongest effect was (i) the 0.06-fold reduction of Scn4b encoding the sodium voltage-gated channel beta subunit 4 (also known as Navbeta4 or LQT10), in both tissue homogenates and in the astrocytic fraction. The SCN4B protein regulates the depolarization of excitable membranes [111]. Other consistent prominent decreases were documented for (ii) the synaptic factor Snap25 (encoding the Synaptosome Associated Protein 25, as t-SNARE complex member involved in the molecular regulation of neurotransmitter release) in both tissues and astrocytic fraction, (iii) the synaptic factor Unc13c (encoding Munc13-3, as exocytosis factor in the presynaptic active zone), as well as (iv) the neurite transport factor Kif5a (encoding the Neuronal Kinesin Heavy Chain, as microtubule-dependent motor required for slow axonal transport) again in both tissues and astrocytic fraction. In addition, a strong decrease of (v) Hmgcr (encoding 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, as the rate-limiting enzyme for cholesterol synthesis, regulated via negative feedback by sterols) was apparent in both tissues and the astrocytic fraction. Overall, these downregulations provide molecular insights into the detrimental changes that affect the functions of the astrocyte-microglia-synapse-neurite unit.
Among the consistent upregulations (Table 1B), the strongest effects were observed in both tissues and the microglia fraction, regarding (i) Gpnmb to log2FC of 4.38, equal to 2082% (encoding the glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B, also known as hematopoietic growth factor inducible neurokinin-1, as integrin binding factor associated with amyloidosis type PLCA3), (ii) Cst7 (encoding cystatin-F, as protease-inhibitory factor associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy), (iii) Clec7a (encoding the C-type lectin domain containing protein 7A, also known as CD369, as pattern-recognition receptor in the innate immune system that recognizes a variety of beta-1,3-linked and beta-1,6-linked glucans from fungi and plants, activating NF-kappa-B and MAP kinase p38 pathways and enhancing cytokine production), (iv) Slc11a1 (encoding the solute carrier family 11, member 1, as proton-coupled divalent metal ion transporter that sequestrates Fe2+ and Mn2+, localized to late-endosomal/lysosomal membranes), (v) Lgals3 (encoding lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble factor 3, as advanced glycation end-product receptor that coordinates the recognition of membrane damage with mobilization of core autophagy regulators), (vi) Lgals3bp (encoding galectin-3 binding protein, as factor that promotes integrin-mediated cell adhesion and stimulates host defense). Overall, these upregulations provide molecular insights into the mechanisms of the reactive microgliosis in a neurodegenerative process.
Table 1B. Consistency analysis between the new 10-month-old brain compound and cell-type-specific RNA-seq transcript profiles and previously reported 14-month-old spinal cord oligonucleotide microarray data, comparing all upregulations with nominal significance, in the global transcriptome of Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice.
Table 1B. Consistency analysis between the new 10-month-old brain compound and cell-type-specific RNA-seq transcript profiles and previously reported 14-month-old spinal cord oligonucleotide microarray data, comparing all upregulations with nominal significance, in the global transcriptome of Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice.
Preprints 201069 i002

2.5. RNA-seq Transcript Consistency Analysis Among Glial Fractions Shows a Prominent Increase of Transcripts Encoding Cytoplasmic Ribosomal Proteins of Large and Small Subunits

Thus, the new RNA-seq profiles showed consistency with previously validated microarray data. Given that RNA-seq findings may reveal RNA processing changes that cannot be detected by rigid oligonucleotide approaches, the subsequent effort considered only RNA-seq consistency. For this purpose, all RNA-seq data were filtered to identify effects with reproducibility between the overall brain compound RNA-seq, the astrocytic fraction, and the microglial fraction.
Among the consistent downregulations (Table S2A), known glial factors (Ndrg4, encoding N-myc downstream-regulated gene 4 protein, required for mitogenic signaling and cell cycle progression), but also synaptic factors (Slc17a7 encoding the vesicular glutamate transporter 1, Cplx1 encoding complexin 1, Syt1 encoding syntaxin 1, Scnb encoding synuclein beta), axonal factors (Nefh below the log2FC of -2.4 in microglial fraction, corresponding to 19%; with Nefl both encoding neurofilament subunits), and dendritic factors (Nptx1 encoding neuronal pentraxin 1 as AMPA receptor clustering factor) were prominent, as unspecific correlates of the neurodegenerative process. As the strongest impact by the polyQ-expansion in the translation modulator ATXN2, with immediate credibility, strong decreases of Cyfip2 (encoding cytoplasmic FMR1 interacting protein 2) and Eef1a2 (encoding eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 2, as neuron-specific, monomeric, adult paralog) were observed. In view of the effect of mutant cytoplasmic ATXN2 on Cyfip2 expression here, it is noteworthy that knockout of its more nuclear paralog ATXN2L were reported to selectively deplete the levels of Nufip2 (encoding nuclear FMR1 interacting protein 2) [67].
Among the consistent upregulations (Table S2B), prominent effects included the inductions of immunological factors Usp18 (encoding ubiquitin specific peptidase 18, as interferon-induced ISG15-specific processing protease) and Ifitm3 (encoding the interferon-induced transmembrane protein 3, as antiviral protein that disrupts intracellular cholesterol homeostasis), as well as Eef1a1 (encoding the eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1, as ubiquitous, dimeric, embryonic paralog), while practically all other consistent increases were mild and concerned selectively the cytoplasmic ribosomal factors, both for the large and the small subunit.

2.6. STRING Analysis of Interactions and Bioinformatics Enrichments in Glial Fractions Extends the Observations of Transcript Reduction in Synapses, Axons, and Dendrites, Versus Induction of Ribosomal and Inflammatory Factors

Analyzing the consistent dysregulations in brain compound, astroglial, and microglial fractions further, and evaluating comprehensively also medium and small effects, not only the strong effects, an additional bioinformatics STRING interaction and pathways enrichment analysis was performed.
Regarding consistent downregulations, statistically significant deficits were found (Figure 6A) for transcripts in presynapses (Gene Ontology term Cellular Compartment 0098793, false discovery rate 4.55e-19), postsynapses (GOCC 0098794, FDR 6.40e-18), dendrites (GOCC 0030425, FDR 3.50e-16), axons (GOCC 0030424, FDR 1.09e-16), with an overall protein-protein-interaction enrichment p-value <1.0e-16. It was noteworthy that Spock2 (encoding secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine, or SPARC, as a glial and neuronal factor that is usually induced during diseases or injury [112]) showed decreased levels. It was also interesting to note that reduced Fbxl16 (encoding F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 16, as C-myc stabilizer [113]) was in direct correlation with the reduction of Ndrg4 (encoding an N-myc downstream-regulated factor [114]), suggesting altered growth signaling in the myc oncogenic pathway.
Regarding consistent upregulations, statistically significant deficits were found (Figure 6B) for cytoplasmic translation (GO term Biological Process 002181, FDR 4.82e-29) and for ribosome assembly (GO term Biological Process 0042255, FDR 6.27e-06), with an overall protein-protein-interaction enrichment p-value <1.0e-16.

2.7. RNA-seq Consistency Analysis Among Glial Fractions for Small RNAs Finds Upregulation of All tRNAs Versus Downregulation of all Antisense RNAs and All Processed Pseudogenes

Performing also a small RNA sequencing analysis (sRNA-seq, including e.g. antisense RNA, lincRNA, miRNA, mt-tRNA, piRNA, processed pseudogene RNA, processed transcripts, small protein coding mRNA, pseudogene RNA, retained intron RNA, ribozyme RNA, scaRNA, sense intronic RNA, snoRNA, tRNA and unprocessed pseudogene RNA), with details on quality control assessment provided in Suppl. Material S2, again, consistency criteria were applied to define effects in direct correlation among astroglial and microglial fractions.
Exclusively downregulations were observed for two sRNA classes: antisense RNA and processed pseudogene RNA (Table 2A). The strongest effect concerned Gm36043-201, a predicted long non-coding RNA documented in the Ensembl genome browser to contain two exons on mouse chromosome 19.
Exclusively upregulations were observed for one sRNA class: cytoplasmic tRNAs (Table 2B). These effects were all mild. The relatively biggest effect concerned tRNAs for threonine.
Preprints 201069 i004

2.8. RNA-seq Analysis at the Gene Level of Microglia-Specific Effects Reveals ~8-Fold Accumulation of Uridine-Rich Small Nuclear RNA Rnu1b2

Given that the dysregulations were much stronger for microglial than for astroglial factors, we explored them without consistency filtering, based on gene-based analysis rather than on the previous transcript-based analysis that takes different isoforms into account. This slightly different approach identified various dysregulations that are specific to microglia and not recognized in brain homogenate as a complex tissue (Table 3A). This approach, without consistency evaluation, has great potential to identify cell-specific dysregulations that get diluted in the complete tissue, but it is also the most artifact-prone strategy, so future validation will be critical. Given that microgliosis and astrogliosis are expected during any neurodegenerative processes, moderately increased glial mRNA levels (below 2-fold) must be viewed with caution. During this study, great care was taken to use equal amounts of RNA for cDNA preparation, and to normalize the sequencing data, but of course, the relative decrease of neuronal transcripts may cause a converse relative increase in glial transcripts in any normalized homogenate. Clearly, increased mass or number of glial cells may also act as confounders (see Figure 2), and pathological accumulation due to an RNA processing block upon Atxn2 mutation may be present, so increased expression levels are not necessarily due to transcriptional upregulations.
In addition to the previously mentioned strong upregulations of Gpnmb, Cst7, Clec7a, Slc11a1, Lgals3, and Lgals3bp, further strong inductions were noted for Itgax, Spp1, Apoe, Axl, and below 2-fold inductions for Csf, Cd63, Fam20c, Lpl, and Mpeg1, as probably unspecific neuroinflammatory signature. Interestingly, a potentially Atxn2 mutation-specific massive mutation effect was noted for the pre-mRNA splicing factor Rnu1b2, which increased 14-fold (log2FC of 3.8, corresponding to 1390%). This uridine-rich small RNA is a potential target of the LSM domain in ATXN2, so this novel exploratory observation is interesting and merits future follow-up experiments, although it is microglia-specific and currently unconfirmed.
In addition to the previously mentioned strong downregulations of the glial factor Ndrg4 and of several synaptic/axonal/dendritic factors, further strong reduction was noted for the long non-coding small nucleolar RNA Rian, which was previously found downregulated in Parkinson’s disease and shown to modulate its neuroinflammatory process [115]. Furthermore, the observation of reduced Syne1 levels has particular credibility given that the SYNE1 protein was previously reported to co-accumulate with ATXN2 aggregates in the Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mouse brain [67].

2.9. RNA-seq Analysis at the Gene Level of Astroglia-Specific Effects Documents Mainly the Neurite Retraction

To gain similar insights also in the astroglia-specific effects, again gene-based analysis was conducted and showed milder dysregulations (Table 3B).
The expression increases were close to the 2-fold threshold that can be explained by relative enrichment of glial transcripts upon relative loss of neuronal transcripts in any normalized homogenate, and by increased astrocyte mass during a process of reactive astrogliosis.
In addition to the previously mentioned decreases of Cplx1, Camk2b, Snap25, Ndrg4, Kif5a, Eef1a2, only the new decreases of Agt (encoding Angiotensinogen, also known as Serine Proteinase Inhibitor A8, as potent regulator of blood pressure, body fluid and electrolyte homeostasis) and Etnppl (encoding ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase, as cellular response factor to glucocorticoid stimulus, implicated in the ceramide phosphoethanolamine catabolic process and the phospholipid transfer to membranes) represent astrocyte-enriched transcripts, while the other decreases affect inhibitory neuron factors (Dnm1, Sptbn2, Adcy1, Kcnq2, Slc12a5, Celsr3, Cplx2, Unc13a, Trank1, Camk2a, Atp1a3) or excitatory neuron factors (Mical2, Ppfia4, Slc17a7), according to http://www.braincellatlas.org (last accessed on January 23, 2026) cerebellar data. Overall, the reactive astrogliosis appears little relevant in comparison to the strong reactive microgliosis and the massive neurite retraction according to these RNA-seq data.
Preprints 201069 i006

2.10. RNA-seq Analysis at the Gene Level of Neuron-Specific Effects Documents Novel DNA Effects

To also gain similar insights in the neuron-specific effects, pathway enrichments were considered instead of a tabular compilation of strongest dysregulation, in view of the low fold-changes that are usual für neurons. Expression increases of most histone isoforms led to significant enrichment for several DNA damage response pathways.
(Suppl. Material S1, Figure 17–20, Tables 16–19). Although these exploratory data are unconfirmed, they represent the first evidence that DNA handling and repair mechanisms are relevant for the disease course in SCA2, as was previously reported for Huntington’ disease [116,117,118]. Conversely, the expression decreas of many mitochondrial factors was reflected by significant enrichment for several pathways of respiratory activity and oxidative phosphorylation (Suppl. Material S1, Figure 17–20, Tables 16–19). Certainly, the general loss of neuronal tissue in the aged SCA2 mouse model may have contributed to these decreases.

2.11. Systematic Interrogation of RNA-seq Findings at the Gene Level for Uridine-Rich snRNAs Shows Increases Selectively in the Astroglial Fraction that Can Be Explained by Astrogliosis with Mass Increase

To assess if the strong Rnu1b2 accumulation in microglia was a unique finding, or recapitulated for other uridine-rich snRNAs with a weaker effect size in any fraction, a systematic compilation of all Rnu gene family data is shown in Table S3. Indeed, many Rnu family members were detected, sometimes with two isoforms and additional pseudogenes. But the strong Rnu1b2 accumulation in microglia was not recapitulated for other Rnu variants destined to the spliceosome. Curiously, several of these Rnu genes showed significantly but mildly increased expression, and two isoforms showed converse decreases, always in the astroglia-enriched fraction. Here, it has to be taken into account that astrogliosis is present the mutant brains, and that effect sizes with log2FC values around 0.4 can simply be due to the relative increase of glial transcripts due to the relative decrease of neural transcripts in any normalized homogenate. They should not be explained by transcriptional upregulation or by accumulation due to impaired processing.

3. Discussion

Recent research showed that most of the disease genes underlying the neurodegenerative processes of Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease are strongly expressed in glial cells (astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes, not only neurons) [106,119]. In the case of SCA2/ALS13, it is well established that the responsible disease protein Ataxin-2 is best detected in the vulnerable neurons due to their large cytoplasm, but it is ubiquitously expressed according to comprehensive databases (www.proteinatlas.org, last accessed on Jan 23, 2026) and gets transcriptionally induced during stress periods of glial cells [120,121]. However, the role of glial cells upon polyQ-expansion or knockout of Ataxin-2 and its orthologs/paralogs has not been studied previously. All transcriptomic, proteomic, phospho-proteomic, lipidomic, and metabolomic studies so far were done in whole tissue homogenates or organismal extracts in humans, mice, flies, yeast, and plants [66,67,68,69,72,82,83,86,88,96,99,101,122,123,124,125,126,127,128]. As a matter of course, relevant mutation effects in specific cell types may get diluted and obscured when complex tissue extracts are used for subsequent analyses.
The present study successfully enriched astroglial and microglial fractions, whereas the neuronal transcriptome profile should be viewed with caution due to low RNA yields. Fraction purity was assessed by RT-qPCR and immunocytochemistry, showing an approximately two-fold higher cell number from mutants, despite the lower brain weight of mutants. Both glial fractions were compared via global RNA-seq from 10-month-old Atxn2-CAG100-knockin mice as an authentic model of SCA2/ALS13. Overall, the data indicate that the loss of synaptic / axonal / dendritic transcripts is prominent at this stage (with Nefh mRNA for the neurofilament heavy chain transcript as an axonal factor down in glial fractions to below 19%), and microglial dysregulations are strong (with the Gpnmb transcript encoding Osteoactivin up to above 2000%), while astroglial dysregulations are minor. The unspecific signs of the neurodegenerative process include the induction of a microglial neuroinflammatory signature including not only Gpnmb, but also Cst7, Clec7a, Slc11a1, Lgals3, Lgals3bp, Itgax (CD11c), Spp1 (Osteopontin), Apoe, Axl, Usp18, Ifitm3, Rnf213, in a response pattern that has been observed also in neurodegenerative processes such as Alzheimer’s, Fronto-temporal dementia, and Parkinson’s disease, as well as nervous system trauma and infarction [129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144]. These findings lead us to propose that disease severity and progression in our SCA2 mouse model should be quantified by measuring the ratio between Gpnmb increase and Nefh decrease.
There were specific dysregulations that relate to the altered function and interactome of the disease protein ATXN2, firstly at the translation apparatus. Strong decreases of the Cyfip2 and Eef1a2 transcripts were documented, with a parallel increase of Eef1a1, suggesting that polyQ expansion of ATXN2 selectively impairs the translation at the initiation and re-initiation (i.e., elongation) steps. In good agreement, ATXN2 has a known direct protein interaction with PABPC1 (polyA-binding protein, cytoplasmic, type 1), which associates with the 3′ tail of mRNAs to mediate their circularization, in a step before ribosome recruitment and translation initiation, and their association is affected by the polyQ expansion [65]. The two translation elongation factor paralogs are 97% identical. Eef1a2 serves as a monomeric, adult form with selective neuronal expression and high phosphorylation, particularly on tyrosine residues, with established functions in neuronal signaling (e.g., mTOR-dependent axonal repair). In comparison, Eef1a1 functions as a dimeric, embryonic ubiquitous form with a 7-fold higher GDP dissociation rate, with known roles for cytoskeletal modifications [145]. The Cyfip family is thought to modulate translation initiation, with the isoform Cyfip1 acting at the 5’ end while Cyfip2 targets the 3’ end of mRNAs, affecting mainly the expression of actin cytoskeleton factors that are crucial for synaptic plasticity [146]. This deleterious effect of polyQ-expansions in ATXN2 on mRNA circularization and re-initiation of translation for elongation efficiency may be the underlying cause for the transcriptional upregulation of cytoplasmic ribosomal factors in the large and small subunits, and of the cytoplasmic tRNAs. These mild but systematic and consistent RNA-seq observations are likely to represent a cellular compensation effort to maintain sufficient protein biosynthesis. However, a partial substitution of deficient neuronal Eef1a2, which mediates the necessary stimulus-dependent protein synthesis for synapses, by enhanced levels of embryonal high-yield Eef1a1 and elevated levels of translation machinery (ribosomes and tRNA) would be inadequately governed by the excitatory versus inhibitory signals within synapses. Overall, these data elucidate how ATXN2 polyQ expansion impacts the translation regulation steps, in similar ways as was reported for ATXN2-null mice [69,70,72].
Secondly, there were additional specific dysregulations that relate to ATXN2 functions, in RNA processing upstream from translation events. The finding that significantly dysregulated small RNAs invariably showed decreases for all antisense RNAs and for all processed pseudogenes indicates that the impact of ATXN2 polyQ expansion is not restricted to translation. This notion is supported by the deficient levels of the long non-coding small nucleolar RNA Rian. Apparently, the processing of non-translated sRNAs is affected by cytoplasmic ATXN2, even if an RNA like Rian is trafficked to the nucleolus rather than the cytoplasm. Of course, indirect effects might be responsible, but the exploratory observation of a 13.9-fold accumulation of Rnu1b2 levels provides an interesting potential explanation via a direct mechanism. ATXN2 structure is dominated by its N-terminal LSm-fold with 5 beta-barrels. LSm domains are derived from bacterial Escherichia coli Hfq / YlxS and archaeal Sm1 / Sm2 proteins, which function as RNA chaperones, with preferential binding to regulatory small uridine-rich RNAs, and crucial roles for spliceosome evolution and ribosomal translation [62,147,148,149,150]. Five primary uridine-rich small nuclear RNAs are present in the spliceosome (U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6), having an essential role for pre-mRNA splicing [151,152], and another uridine-rich snRNA (U7) modulates histone mRNA 3’ end maturation [153]. The murine Rnu1b2 snRNA (corresponding to human RNU1-2) represents one isoform of the murine U1 snRNA [154]. U1 RNA is essential for recognizing the 5’ splice site of mRNA precursors to facilitate intron removal [152,155]. Rnu1b2 and its paralog Rnu1b1 are chromosomally located 5 kilobases apart, coded on opposite DNA strands, with juxtaposed 5’ ends, and share identical flanking sequences 5’ and 3’ to the gene [156,157,158,159,160]. Rnu1b paralogs show embryonic and fetal expression, while Rnu1a paralogs show constitutive expression in differentiated cell types [161,162,163]. It remains unclear what the functional differences between Rnu1b2 and Rnu1b1 might be. Crucially, the uridine-rich snRNAs undergo several processing steps. U1, as a Sm-class snRNA, is transcribed by RNA polymerase-II and receives a 7-methylguanosine (m7G) cap in the nucleus. It is then exported to the cytoplasmic U-bodies where 3′-end trimming occurs together with cap hypermethylation to 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine (m3G). U-bodies form upon cellular stress in the vicinity of P-bodies, where 5’-cap processing and 3’-end trimming also occur, but are taken further until the complete degradation of RNA [164,165,166]. For P-bodies, a perturbation upon experimental manipulation of ATXN2 was already documented [63]. In U-bodies, the SMN complex recognizes the 3’-end trimming of uridine-rich snRNAs and assembles their Sm sites with seven Sm proteins (B/B’, D3, D2, D1, E, F, G) [167]. The resulting ribonucleoprotein complex is re-imported into the nucleus to become the spliceosome [164,168,169,170]. Clearly, the U1 processing step at U-bodies via the SMN complex provides an opportunity where cytoplasmic ATXN2 with its LSm domain has access to uridine-rich snRNAs before they become part of the spliceosome. In this context, it is interesting to note that mutations in the SMN1 protein as part of the SMN complex result in axonal motor neuron degeneration with fetal, pediatric or juvenile onset [171,172,173,174,175,176], and mutations in ATXN2 cause pathologically indistinguishable axonal motor neuron degeneration with adult onset [7,101,177,178,179], in good agreement with these thoughts about a functional interaction between ATXN2 and SMN1 at U-bodies. Altogether, the observed about 14-fold accumulation of the small nuclear Rnu1b2 isoform seems a plausible specific effect of ATXN2 polyQ expansion, which was documented only in microglial fractions by gene-based analysis, and may have been diluted in previous global transcriptome surveys of complex nervous tissues that were focused on mRNAs. It is important to know that U1 snRNPs act as potent triggers of innate immunity in monocytes, having established relevance for autoimmune pathology and (for the neuroinflammatory process, or for stress-triggered splice adaptations?) in Alzheimer’s disease [180,181,182,183,184]. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that U1 snRNAs were previously proposed as useful biomarkers [185], and that their manipulation has therapeutic value [186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193].
In this context, another isolated observation without consistency in the current RNA-seq dataset becomes noteworthy. Only in the neuronal fraction, where the quantification may be reliable only for very abundant transcripts, the levels of Eftud2 showed a significant accumulation (log2FC 4.37). As a component of the minor spliceosome, the putative GTPase protein EFTUD2 (also known as U5 snRNP Specific Protein with 116 KD, or SNU114 Homolog) is integrated in the U5 snRNP and the U4/U6-U5 tri-snRNP complexes, serving to enable the splicing of U12-type introns in pre-mRNAs [194,195,196]. Eftud2 dysregulation is particularly deleterious for cerebellar Purkinje neurons [197,198] and has a prominent role in antiviral splice adaptations [199,200]. However, this RNA-seq observation is clearly exploratory and cannot provide mechanistic insights at present without further confirmation.
Thirdly, there was a specific dysregulation that relates to ATXN2 function, regarding the highly dynamic actin cytoskeleton at the nuclear envelope, in addition to the synaptic terminals. The finding of reduced Syne1 levels was previously observed together with a reduction of SYNE1 protein levels and a co-accumulation of SYNE1 protein with the ATXN2 aggregates in aged Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mouse brain [67], as mentioned above. This previous report analyzed knockout mice of ATXN2L as nucleus-cytoplasm shuttling paralog of ATXN2 [67], observing a prominent impact on the actin modulator SYNE2 (also known as Nesprin-2) at the nuclear envelope [201], and on the nuclear protein NUFIP2 as target of a O-GlcNAcylation-mediated condensation in the context of actin-binding and focal adhesion factors [202]. Parallel investigations of conditional ATXN2L-depletion at adult age documented a clear alteration of the nuclear splicing pathway [68]. This knowledge is now complemented by novel RNA-seq evidence that the polyQ expansion in the completely cytoplasmic paralog ATXN2 causes reductions of Syne1 and Cyfip2 levels. As functional similarities, both giant SYNE/Nesprin proteins have paired N-terminal calponin-homology (CH) domains for actin binding and C-terminal KASH domains for membrane anchoring. These domains are encoded in multiple isoforms that are subject to alternate splicing, getting positioned in overlapping localizations at nuclear and other membranes (where they ensure actin-dependent proximity towards synaptic signals or other stimuli). These domains also regulate cell polarity and filopodia [203,204,205,206,207]. As functional difference, SYNE2 was found to be critical for cortical and hippocampal neurons, while SYNE1 is more relevant for cerebellar neurons, with its mutations resulting in spinocerebellar ataxia type SCAR8 and motor neuron degeneration [208,209,210]. Regarding the other gene family with dysregulated expression upon ATXN2/ATXN2L mutations, both the NUFIP2 and CYFIP2 proteins are interactors of the Fragile X Mental Retardation protein (FMRP), as members of a family of regulators of neuronal translation, of activity-dependent bulk endocytosis, and of synaptic function, acting as adaptors of ribonucleoprotein complexes and actin [211,212,213,214,215,216]. NUFIP isoforms are thought to connect FMRP with nuclear export, RNA processing, the control of protein synthesis at synaptic sites, and the autophago-lysosomal degradation pathway [217,218,219,220,221,222,223], while CYFIP isoforms connect FMRP with translation suppression (CYFIP2 acting at the 3’ untranslated region of mRNAs), actin polymerization, and cytoskeleton remodeling [146,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236]. The impact of Ataxin-2 family members on the NUFIP/CYFIP family might explain previous findings in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans that deletion of its single-copy Ataxin-2 ortholog regulates centrosomes at the nuclear envelope and cytoskeletal dynamics [237]. These observations are also in good agreement with observations in the fly Drosophila melanogaster that its single-copy Ataxin-2 ortholog interacts with FMRP [98,238] and impacts the actin cytoskeleton [56].
Fourth, there were very consistent downregulations of Sptbn2 in both glial and neuronal fractions (Tables S2A and 4A). This is remarkable in view of the roles of ATXN2 and SPTBN2 as disease proteins responsible for spinocerebellar ataxia. Mutations in SPTBN2 cause autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia type 5 (SCA5) and autosomal recessive SCAR14/SPARCA1 [239,240,241,242]. SPTBN2 is a structural constituent of the postsynapse, essential for anchoring glutamate receptors and transporters (such as EAAT4 and mGluR1) at the plasma membrane [243,244]. It helps shape the dendritic spine neck, regulating synaptic transmission to prevent excessive excitation [245,246]. SPTBN2 plays a vital role in trafficking proteins, maintaining the structural integrity of the Golgi apparatus, and managing vesicle transport within neurons [247,248,249]. In particular, it supports cerebellar Purkinje cells [250,251]. The impact of ATXN2 polyQ expansion on the expression of beta-spectrin isoforms in general, and on their roles to connect the cortical actin cytoskeleton with synaptic membranes via ankyrin-binding and pleckstrin-homology domains [252,253], was substantiated by the significant decreased expression of Sptb (Table S2A), Sptbn4 (log2FC -1.4 in astroglial, -1.23 in microglial fraction) and Sptbn1 (log2FC -0.72 in microglial fraction).
There are clear limitations of this study. Unfortunately, not enough aged Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice were available to obtain sufficient material for RNA-sequencing of the neuronal fraction, given that the progressive expansion in the polyQ domain of ATXN2 has an ever more profound impact on fertility due to its expression changes in peripheral tissues [69,100]. Our team discontinued breeding of this mouse line upon closure of the lab due to retirement of the principal investigator, but the sperm is cryoconserved at the company genOway (Lyon, France) and at the European Mouse Mutant Archive (EMMA ID EM:13598, see https://www.infrafrontier.eu/emma/strain-details/?q=13598, last accessed on February 3, 2026), so that independent teams can assess the present data. Furthermore, it is clearly possible that RNA-seq findings about SCA2/ALS13-unique dysregulations that are not reproduced by oligonucleotide microarray data, or RNA-seq data in a single fraction (such as the accumulation of Rnu1b2, or the deficiency of Rian) might be technical or analytical artifacts.
Potential next experiments might of course include (i) the analysis of frozen or fresh patient samples such as nervous tissues (very few are available, with their preservation state always being a cause of concern) or the analysis of patient peripheral blood macrophages, (ii) the analysis of independent SCA2/ALS13 models in mice, flies, nematodes, zebrafish, yeast, or plants, (iii) the analysis of independent SCA2/ALS13 models in vitro, such as microglial cell lines, cultures of primary microglia, extracts from microglial fractions. For cell culture experiments, it should be considered that the microglia-specific dysregulations described here may have arisen only after the exposure of these cells to stress and debris, while the effects may not be detectable in complex brain tissue and cell cultures during normal growth phases. Clearly, the maturation of uridine-rich snRNAs and their incorporation into spliceosome precursors by the SMN complex is concentrated in U-bodies only after cellular stress, while it occurs diffusely in the cytoplasm of unstressed cells [254,255,256]. Beyond microglia- and astroglia-enriched fractions, it would be desirable to breed and age the Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mouse line again, complementing the present data with the analysis of neuronal and oligodendroglial fractions, to understand more cell-type-specific disease mechanisms in view of the strong and early neurite retraction and demyelination in SCA2 [101,257,258,259,260,261,262]. If the evidence about non-coding small RNA dysregulations is substantiated, a systematic study about the processing of all uridine-rich snRNA, snoRNAs, antisense RNAs, and pseudogenes should follow. Crucially, it is worthwhile considering the possibility that a lack of completely processed uridine-rich snRNAs would impair spliceosomal activity, and that synthetic substitutes with slow turnover due to pseudouridylation might provide a causal therapeutic opportunity [263,264,265,266,267,268]. As stated before, all these confirmatory studies with different biological material and varying technical approaches will have to be conducted by independent research teams.
In conclusion, the transcriptome profiling from microglia- and astroglia-enriched fractions from 10-month-old Atxn2-CAG100-KIN brain documented a severe retraction of neural terminals from their glia-association, together with strong reactive microgliosis at this stage, while the astrogliosis was mild, as unspecific signatures of the neurodegenerative process. As potential SCA2/ALS13-specific dysregulations that relate to the known phenotype, functions, and interactomes of ATXN2, four new effects complement previous findings. (i) Altered levels were documented for two translation elongation factors in converse direction; (ii) reduced levels were found for a cytoplasmic member of the CYFIP family (in analogy, its nuclear homolog is affected by ATXN2L mutation); (iii) decreased levels were also observed for another member of the Nesprin/SYNE family that mediates membrane movement (in analogy, a second member is affected by ATXN2L mutation); (iv) decreased transcript levels were observed for several members of the beta-spectrin family. The functional roles of all these molecules converge in the stimulus-dependent mRNA splicing and translation, particularly for actin-associated cytoskeletal factors, to enable plasticity of synaptic as well as nuclear membranes. The impact of ATXN2 polyQ expansion was not restricted to coding mRNAs, but among small non-coding RNAs, mild but consistent effects were documented for all antisense RNAs and all processed pseudogenes, which invariably showed downregulations, similar to the small nucleolar non-coding RNA Rian. As a single, exploratory, and currently not validated observation about possible mechanisms that mediate this impact upstream from cytoplasmic ribosomal translation, the 13.9-fold accumulation of the uridine-rich small nuclear RNA Rnu1b2 stands out. As a plausible scenario, the mutation directly adjacent to the LSM domain of cytoplasmic ATXN2 could affect its binding and processing of uridine-rich RNAs as its known targets, when they are exported from the nucleus to cytoplasmic U-bodies for hypermethylation of their 5’ cap, and trimming of their 3’ ends. Subsequently, the processed U-rich snRNAs will interact with the SMN complex, so that they can assemble with the seven Sm proteins to form the spliceosome, before this ribonucleoprotein complex gets re-imported into the nucleus and assumes its activity there. Unfortunately, this microglia-specific effect could not be validated further by this team, and future assessment by independent groups is urgently needed.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Mouse Husbandry

All mouse experiments were approved by regional authorities and performed in compliance with the German Animal Welfare Act, the Council Directive of 24th November 1986 (86/609/EWG) with Annex II and the ETS123 (European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals). Mice were provided with food and water ad libitum and were housed in a regular 12 hr light-dark cycle at the central animal facility (ZFE) of the University Hospital Frankfurt. Heterozygous mating was employed to generate Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice with a C57BL/6 background. The offspring littermates, namely homozygous Atxn2-CAG100-knockin (KIN) and wild-type animals of the same sex, were aged in neighboring cages for subsequent comparisons. Of the 10-month-old mice studied by RNA-seq, two mutant-WT pairs were male and one pair was female.

4.2. Genotyping

DNA was isolated from ear punches. 50 µl of alkaline lysis buffer (10 mM NaOH, 0.2 mM disodium EDTA, pH 12) was added to ear punches or tail clips, followed by incubation at 95 °C for 30 mins. Samples were cooled down on ice, followed by adding 50 µl of neutralization buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 5). 1 µl of this extracted DNA was used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR). TaKaRa LA Taq-Polymerase (Takara Bio Inc #RR002A, Takara Bio USA, San Jose, CA, USA) was used to identify wild-type and Atxn2-KIN alleles with primer pair F-NOW1 5′-TGAGTTGACTCCACAGGGAGGTGAGC-3′ and R-NOW1 5′-CCATCTCGCCAGCCCGTAAGATTC-3′. The wild-type allele yields an amplicon size of 793 bp, and the KIN allele yields 948 bp.

4.3. Isolation of Cell Types From The Mouse Brain

The subsequent protocol is adapted from Miltenyi adult brain dissociation (Miltenyi, #130-107-677, Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany); adult neuron isolation, mouse (Miltenyi, #130-126-603); Anti-ACSA2 MicroBead Kit, mouse (Miltenyi, #130-097-679); CD11b (Microglia) MicroBeads, human and mouse (Miltenyi, #130-093-636), see [269,270]. All steps were performed with ice-cold buffers unless stated otherwise.

4.3.1. Tissue Dissociation

Mouse brains were isolated, weighed, and transferred to gentleMACS C-tubes (Miltenyi, #130-096-334) containing ice-cold DPBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+ (DPBS). Each C-tube never exceeded 500 mg of tissue. DPBS was replaced with 1950 µl of enzyme mix 1, as mentioned in the Miltenyi adult brain dissociation kit (Miltenyi #130-107-677). To this, 30 µl of enzyme mix 2 were added, and sealed C-tubes were attached to gentleMACS Octo Dissociator with heaters (Miltenyi, #130-096-427). After 30 mins of gentle tissue dissociation at 37 °C, samples were briefly centrifuged in 15-second pulses, never allowing them to cross 300xg. All material was allowed to collect at the bottom of the tube, the supernatant was discarded, and the cell pellet was resuspended gently in 10 ml of ice-cold DPBS. The MACS SmartStrainer (Miltenyi, #130-098-462) was rinsed with ice-cold DBPS, and the cell suspension was passed through and collected in a 15 ml tube. Samples were centrifuged at 300xg for 10 mins at 4 °C. The supernatant was aspirated, the cell pellet was resuspended in ice-cold DBPS, and samples were processed for debris removal. For culturing, brain tissue from 3 day old pups was dissociated using the Neural Tissue Dissociation Kid (P) (Miltenyi Biotech, #130-029-628), following Manufacturer’s instructions.

4.3.2. Debris Removal

For debris removal, a density gradient approach was used where the cells were resuspended with 3100 µl of ice-cold DBPS, to which 900 µl of debris removal solution were added and gently mixed well. About 4 ml of ice-cold DPBS were added gradually to form two layers. Samples were then centrifuged at 3000xg for 10 mins at 4 °C. The top two layers were aspirated off, and ice-cold DPBS was added to the bottom later and mixed well by inverting the tube. This tube was again centrifuged at 1000xg for 10 mins at 4 °C, and the supernatant was discarded.

4.3.3. Red blood Cell Removal

To eliminate red blood cells, 1 ml of 1x red blood cell solution (Miltenyi, #130-096-334) was added to the cell pellet and incubated at 4 °C. After 10 mins, 5 ml of ice-cold DBPS were added and mixed well. Samples were centrifuged at 4 °C and 300xg for 10 mins, and the supernatant was discarded.

4.3.4. Magnetic Separation

Before magnetic separation, cell number was determined, and 80 µl of ice-cold DPBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+ + 0.5% BSA were added to the cell pellet for a total number of cells in the range of 5x106 – 4x107. Microglia, astrocytes and neurons were isolated sequentially from a single mouse brain. (i) 20 µl of CD11b (Microglia) MicroBeads (Miltenyi #130-093-636) were added to cell suspension and incubated at 2–8 °C for 10 mins. The LS columns (Miltenyi, #130-042-401) were rinsed with 2 ml of ice-cold DPBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+ + 0.5% BSA, and flow through was discarded. A final volume of 500 µl of cell suspension was allowed to flow through the LS columns, and the flow-through was collected, which contained unlabeled cells. The LS column was washed 3 times with ice-cold DPBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+ + 0.5% BSA. Microglia fraction was eluted into a new tube by firmly pushing the plunger onto LS column containing 1 ml of ice-cold DPBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+ + 0.5% BSA. This process was repeated once again to enrich purity. (ii) The unlabeled cell fraction was centrifuged at 4 °at 300xg for 10 mins and cell pellet was resuspended in 80 µl of ice-cold DPBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+ + 0.5% BSA. 10 µl of FcR blocking reagent (Miltenyi #130-115-390) were added to cell suspension and incubated at 2–8 °C. After 10 mins, Anti-ACSA-2 MicroBeads (Miltenyi #130-115-390) were added and again incubated at 2–8 °C for 15 mins. Magnetic separation was performed similar to microglia fraction. (iii) The unlabeled cell fraction after astrocyte isolation was centrifuged at 4 °at 300xg for 10 mins and the cell pellet was resuspended in 80 µl of ice-cold DPBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+ + 0.5% BSA. 20 µl of Non-Neuronal Cell Biotin-Antibody Cocktail (Miltenyi #130-115-390) were added to cell suspension and incubated at 2–8 °C. After 5 mins, 20 µL of Anti-Biotin MicroBeads (Miltenyi #130-115-390) and 10 µL of CD31 MicroBeads (Miltenyi #130-097-418) were added to cell suspension and incubated at 2–8 °C for 12 mins. A final volume of 500 µl of cell mixture was allowed to flow through the LS columns. The columns were washed twice with 1 ml of ice-cold DPBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+ + 0.5% BSA. The flow-through contained neuronal cells.

4.3.5. Culture of Primary Cells

24-well culture dishes were coated with 0.01 mg/mL poly-L-Lysine (PDL, Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) for 3 h at 37 °C, followed by washing once with sterile H2O. Microglia were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco), 1% non-essential amino acids solution (Gibco), 1x Pen-strep (Gibco). Astrocytes were cultured in MACS® Neuro Medium (Miltenyi # 130-117-031) supplemented with 0.2% AstroMACS Supplement, 2% MACS NeuroBrew-21, 0.25% L-glutamine (0.5 mM) (Gibco) and 1x Pen-strep (Gibco). Neurons were cultured in Neuro Basal Media (Gibco), 2% B27 supplement (Thermo), 1% L-glutamine, 0.2% FGF (PeproTech), 0.2% PDGF (Proteintech) and 1x Penstrep (Gibco).

4.3.6. RNA Extraction, Library Preparation, RNA-seq and GSEA

Total RNA was extracted from all the isolated cell fractions using TRIzol (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA quantification and quality scores were measured using a LabChipDX equipment (Revvity Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), and were adequate for subsequent sequencing in all fractions. The company GenXPro (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) performed the RNA sequencing. Sequencing libraries were prepared using the MACE-Seq protocol (GenXPro GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) with the inclusion of additional rRNA depletion and polyadenylation steps. Ribosomal RNA was depleted using the Qiagen FastSelect system (Qiagen Inc., Hilden, Germany), followed by polyadenylation of RNA molecules with E. coli poly(A) polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Subsequent NGS library preparation, including the incorporation of unique molecular identifiers (UMIs), was performed using the MACE-Seq kit (GenXPro GmbH) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 platform with 1x76 bps (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Further details on the panRNA-seq analysis procedures, quality control assessments, and gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) can be found in Suppl. Materials S1 and S2 that were generated by the company GenXPro.

4.4. Reverse Transcription-Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCRs)

TRIzol reagent (Sigma, #102543131) was used to isolate total RNA as per the manufacturer’s instructions. To convert RNA to cDNA, we used SuperScript™ IV VILO™ Master Mix with ezDNase™ Enzyme (Invitrogen #11766050, Waltham, MA, USA) with about 1 µg of total RNA as a template for all samples. After cDNA synthesis, the samples were diluted to a 1:10 ratio with ultrapure water. Each sample had biological replicates and technical duplicates. qPCR was performed using 2x FastStart Universal Probe Master (Roche, Basel, Switzerland, #4913957001) with TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) in StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The 2−ΔΔCT method [271] was used for data analysis, from which expression values were averaged across biological/technical replicates per condition. The following Taqman assays were used: Aif1: Mm00520165_m1, Atxn2: Mm01199894_m1, Cd31: Mm01242576_m1, Cldn5: Mm00727012_s1, Dlg4: Mm00492193_m1 Gfap: Mm01253033_m1, Kcnj8: Mm00434620_m1, Map2: Mm00485231_m1, Olig2: Mm01210556_m1, Tmem119: Mm00525305_m1, Tbp: Mm00446973_m1.

4.5. Immunohistochemistry

The respective cell types were cultured for 5 days post-isolation before immunocytochemical analysis. Cells were washed once with 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 1x PBS for 5 min at room temperature. Following fixation, cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in 1x PBS for 2 min and subsequently blocked with Roti®-Block solution (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) for 30 min at room temperature. For microglia and astrocyte staining, cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C in Roti®-Block containing the following primary antibodies: anti-IBA1 (Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA, CL647-81728, 1:200) or anti-GFAP (Proteintech, CL488-60190, 1:200), respectively. After primary antibody incubation, cells were washed three times with 1x PBS and counterstained with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, 1 mg/mL, D9542) to label nuclei. For neuronal staining, cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-MAP2 primary antibody (Proteintech, 17490-1-AP, 1:200) diluted in Roti®-Block. After washing with 1x PBS, cells were incubated with Donkey anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, DyLight™ 550 (Invitrogen, SA5-10039, 1:1000) for 1 hr at room temperature. Following final washes with 1x PBS, all samples were mounted using DAKO mounting medium (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA, #S3023) prior to imaging. Cell imaging was performed using Keyence, BZ-X series, and ImageJ software was used to merge images.

4.6. Quantification and Statistical Analysis

4.6.1. Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (version 8). Volcano Plots were generated with GraphPad Prism (Version 11). Bar graphs represent mean ± SEM and p-values from Welch’s t-test for spinal cord tissue. For cell culture experiments, bar graphs represent mean ± SEM, and 2-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons was used to determine p-values (T 0.05 < p < 0.1; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001).

4.6.2. STRING Pathway Interaction and Enrichment Analysis

The web server https://string-db.org/ was used from 2024 to 2026 with version 12.0, with the last access on January 15, 2026.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org, Suppl. Material S1: Quality assessment of RNA-seq data for mRNA; Suppl. Material S2: Quality assessment of RNA-seq data for small RNA; Figure S1: RT-qPCR analyses of dissociation purity in CD11b-labelled microglial fraction; CSA2-labelled astroglial fraction, and unlabeled neuronal/endothelial fraction); Table S1: RNA concentrations per sample, before RNA-seq; Table S2A-B: Consistency analysis between new RNA-seq profiles in brain compound, astroglial, and microglial fractions; Table S3: Compilation of expression data for Rnu gene family

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.A., A.-R.K. and J.K.; methodology, A.-R.K., R.V., L.-E.A.-M., S.G., N.-E.S. and J.K.; software, G.A., A.-R.K. and J.K.; validation, A.-R.K. and R.V.; formal analysis, G.A, A.-R.K. and J.K.; investigation, G.A., A.-R.K., R. V., S.G. and J.K.; resources, R. V., S.G. and N.-E.S.; data curation, G.A. and J.K.; writing—original draft preparation, G.A., A.-R.K. and J.K.; writing—review and editing, G.A., A.-R.K., R.V., L.-E.A.-M., S.G., N.-E.S. and J.K.; visualization, G.A., A.-R.K., J.K.; supervision, G.A., R. V:, S.G. and J.K.; project administration, G.A.; funding acquisition, G.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, grant number AU96/21-1.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The animal study protocol was approved by the Regierungspräsidium Darmstadt (protocol code V54-19c18-FK/1083, approved on March 27, 2017)

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable (study not involving humans).

Data Availability Statement

Complete analyses in EXCEL files supporting the conclusions of this article, as well as MultiQC reports, are available from the authors upon reasonable request. All raw RNA-seq data were deposited publicly at GEO with the accession numbers GSE319876 and GSE319875.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank technical assistants Gabriele Köpf and Hildegard König for invaluable help. We are grateful to the staff of the Zentrale Forschungs-Einrichtung (ZFE) of the Goethe University Medical School in Frankfurt/Main for their help with animal breeding and aging. We are indebted to the staff of the company GenXPro in Frankfurt/Main for their RNA-seq work and bioinformatics analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ACSA2 Astrocyte cell surface antigen-2
Adcy1 Adenylate Cyclase 1
Agt Angiotensinogen, Serine Proteinase Inhibitor A8
Aif1 Allograft Inflammatory Factor 1 = IBA1
Ald1l1 Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 Family Member L1
ALS13 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis type 13
AMPA Alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid
Apoe Apolipoprotein E
Atp1a3 ATPase Na+/K+ Transporting Subunit Alpha 3
Atx2 Ataxin-2 in flies
Atxn2 Ataxin-2
Atxn2l Ataxin-2-like
Axl AXL Receptor Tyrosine Kinase
Camk2a Calcium/Calmodulin Dependent Protein Kinase II Alpha
Camk2b Calcium/Calmodulin Dependent Protein Kinase II Beat
Cd32 Cluster of differentiation 32
Cd63 Cluster of differentiation 63
Cd68 Cluster of differentiation 68
cDNA Complementary DNA
Celsr3 Cadherin EGF LAG Seven-Pass G-Type Receptor 3
CH Calponin-homology
CID3/4 Chemical-inducible dimerization
Cldn5 Claudin 5
Clec7a C-type lectin domain containing protein 7A,
Cplx1 Complexin 1/2
Cst7 Cystatin-F
Cyfip2 Cytoplasmic FMR1 interacting protein 2
Ddx6 DEAD-Box Helicase 6
Dnm1 Dynamin 1
Eaat4 Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter 4, Solute Carrier Family 1 Member 6
EDTA Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
Eef1a1/2 Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1/2
Eftud2 Elongation Factor Tu GTP Binding Domain Containing 2
Eno2 Enolase 2
Etnppl Ethanolamine-phosphate phospho-lyase
Fam20c Family With Sequence Similarity 20, Member C
Fbxl16 F-box and leucine rich repeat protein 16
FC Fold change
Fcrls Fc receptor-like S
FDR False Discovery Rate
FMRP Fragile X Mental Retardation protein
Gad1/2 Glutamate Decarboxylase 1
GDP Guanosine diphosphate
Gfap Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein
Gls Glutaminase
GO
GO-BP
GO-CC
GO-MF
Gene ontology
Gene ontology – biological process
Gene ontology – cellular component
Gene ontology – molecular function
Gpnmb Glycoprotein Nmb
Grin1
GSEA
Glutamate Receptor, Ionotropic, N-Methyl D-Aspartate 1
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis
Hexb Hexosaminidase Subunit Beta
Hmgcr 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-CoA Reductase
Hmgcs1 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-CoA Synthase 1
IBA1
Ifitm3
Ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1, = AIF1
Interferon-induced transmembrane protein 3
Itgax Integrin Subunit Alpha X
Kcnj8 Potassium Inwardly Rectifying Channel Subfamily J Member 8
Kcnq2 Potassium Voltage-Gated Channel Subfamily Q Member 2
Kif5a Neuronal Kinesin Heavy Chain
KIN Knock-In
Lgals3 Lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble factor 3
Lgals3bp Galectin-3 binding protein
lincRNA Long intergenic non-coding RNA
Lpl Lipoprotein Lipase
LSmAD
MACE
LSm-associated domain
Massive analysis of cDNA ends
MACS Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting
Map1b Microtubule Associated Protein 1B
Map2 Microtubule Associated Protein 2
mGLUR1 Glutamate Metabotropic Receptor 1
Mical2 Microtubule Associated Monooxygenase, Calponin And LIM Domain Containing 2
miRNA MicroRNA
Mpeg1 Macrophage Expressed 1
Mt-tRNA Mitochondrial transfer RNA
Ndrg4 N-myc downstream-regulated gene 4
Nefh Neurofilament Heavy Chain
Nefl Neurofilament Light Chain
Neurod2 Neuronal Differentiation 2
NGS
Nptx1
Next generation sequencing
Neuronal pentraxin 1
Nufip2 Nuclear FMR1 interacting protein 2
Olfml3 Olfactomedin Like 3
Olig2 Oligodendrocyte Transcription Factor 2
P2ry12 Purinergic Receptor P2Y12
PABP Poly(A)-binding protein
Pabpc1 polyA-binding protein, cytoplasmic, type 1
PAR-CLIP Photoactivatable ribonucleoside-enhanced crosslinking and immunoprecipitation
PCA
piRNA
Principal component analysis
Piwi-interacting RNA
Plca3 = Gpnmb, Glycoprotein Nonmetastatic Melanoma Protein B
Ppfia4 PPFI Scaffold Protein A4
Pvalb Parvalbumin
Rab15 Ras-Related Protein Rab-15
Rbfox3 RNA Binding Fox-1 Homolog 3
Rian RNA mprinted and accumulated in nucleus
RNA Ribonucleic acid
Rnf213 Ring Finger Protein 213
Rnu1b2 RNA, U1 Small Nuclear 2
Rph3a Rabphilin 3A
rRNA Ribonucleic acid
RT-qPCR Reverse transcriptase quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
S100b S100 Calcium Binding Protein B
Sall1 Spalt Like Transcription Factor 1
SCA2 Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 2
SCA5 Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 5
SCAR14 Spectrin Beta, Non-Erythrocytic 2
scaRNA Small Cajal body-specific RNA
Scn4b Sodium voltage-gated channel beta subunit 4
SEM Standard error of the mean
Slc11a1 Solute carrier family 11, member 1
Slc12a5 Solute Carrier Family 12 Member 5
Slc17a7 Vesicular glutamate transporter 1
SMN1 Survival Of Motor Neuron 1, Telomeric
Snap25 Synaptosome Associated Protein 25
snoRNA Small nucleolar RNA
snRNA
snRNP
Small nuclear RNA
Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein
SPARCA1 Spectrin-associated autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia
Spi1 Spi-1 Proto-Oncogene
Spp1 Secreted Phosphoprotein 1
Spock2 secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine
Sptbn1 Spectrin Beta, Non-Erythrocytic 1
Sptbn2 Spectrin Beta, Non-Erythrocytic 2
sRNA Small RNA
STRING Search tool for recurring instances of neighbouring genes
Syne1 Spectrin Repeat Containing Nuclear Envelope Protein 1
Syt1 Syntaxin 1
Tmem119 Transmembrane Protein 119
Trank1 Tetratricopeptide Repeat And Ankyrin Repeat Containing 1
Trem2 Triggering Receptor Expressed On Myeloid Cells 2
tRNA Transfer RNA
Tyrobp TYRO Protein Tyrosine Kinase-Binding Protein
Unc13a Unc-13 Homolog A
Usp18 Ubiquitin Specific Peptidase 18
Usp18 Ubiquitin specific peptidase 18
Vim Vimentin
WT Wildtype
ZFE Central Animal Facility

References

  1. Hernandez, A., et al., Genetic mapping of the spinocerebellar ataxia 2 (SCA2) locus on chromosome 12q23-q24.1. Genomics, 1995. 25(2): p. 433-5.
  2. Belal, S., et al., Clinical and genetic analysis of a Tunisian family with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type 1 linked to the SCA2 locus. Neurology, 1994. 44(8): p. 1423-6.
  3. Auburger, G., et al., Autosomal dominant ataxia: genetic evidence for locus heterogeneity from a Cuban founder-effect population. Am J Hum Genet, 1990. 46(6): p. 1163-77.
  4. Gispert, S., et al., Chromosomal assignment of the second locus for autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia (SCA2) to chromosome 12q23-24.1. Nat Genet, 1993. 4(3): p. 295-9.
  5. Wadia, N.H. and R.K. Swami, A new form of heredo-familial spinocerebellar degeneration with slow eye movements (nine families). Brain, 1971. 94(2): p. 359-74.
  6. Orozco Diaz, G., et al., Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia: clinical analysis of 263 patients from a homogeneous population in Holguin, Cuba. Neurology, 1990. 40(9): p. 1369-75.
  7. Estrada, R., et al., Spinocerebellar ataxia 2 (SCA2): morphometric analyses in 11 autopsies. Acta Neuropathol, 1999. 97(3): p. 306-10.
  8. Velazquez-Perez, L., et al., Saccade velocity is controlled by polyglutamine size in spinocerebellar ataxia 2. Ann Neurol, 2004. 56(3): p. 444-7.
  9. Almaguer-Mederos, L.E., et al., Estimation of the age at onset in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 Cuban patients by survival analysis. Clin Genet, 2010. 78(2): p. 169-74.
  10. Almaguer-Mederos, L.E., et al., Estimation of survival in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 Cuban patients. Clin Genet, 2013. 83(3): p. 293-4.
  11. Velazquez-Perez, L., et al., Corticomuscular Coherence: a Novel Tool to Assess the Pyramidal Tract Dysfunction in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2. Cerebellum, 2017. 16(2): p. 602-606.
  12. Rodriguez-Labrada, R., et al., Sleep spindles and K-complex activities are decreased in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2: relationship to memory and motor performances. Sleep Med, 2019. 60: p. 188-196.
  13. Velazquez-Perez, L., et al., Early corticospinal tract damage in prodromal SCA2 revealed by EEG-EMG and EMG-EMG coherence. Clin Neurophysiol, 2017. 128(12): p. 2493-2502.
  14. Reetz, K., et al., Brain atrophy measures in preclinical and manifest spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Ann Clin Transl Neurol, 2018. 5(2): p. 128-137.
  15. Rodriguez-Grana, T., et al., Weight loss is correlated with disease severity in Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2: a cross-sectional cohort study. Nutr Neurosci, 2022. 25(8): p. 1747-1755.
  16. Almaguer-Mederos, L.E., et al., Body Mass Index Is Significantly Associated With Disease Severity in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 Patients. Mov Disord, 2021. 36(6): p. 1372-1380.
  17. Velazquez-Perez, L., et al., Prodromal Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 Subjects Have Quantifiable Gait and Postural Sway Deficits. Mov Disord, 2021. 36(2): p. 471-480.
  18. Velazquez-Perez, L., et al., COVID-19 Impacts the Mental Health and Speech Function in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: Evidences from a Follow-Up Study. Cerebellum, 2024. 23(3): p. 1101-1111.
  19. Vazquez-Mojena, Y., et al., Peripheral Inflammation Links with the Severity of Clinical Phenotype in Spinocerebellar Ataxia 2. Mov Disord, 2023. 38(5): p. 880-885.
  20. Rodriguez-Labrada, R., et al., Progression of Gait Ataxia in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: Clinical Utility of Digitally Measured Gait Metrics. Cerebellum, 2025. 24(6): p. 184.
  21. Rodriguez-Labrada, R., et al., Structural Brain Correlates of Sleep Microstructure in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 and its Role on Clinical Phenotype. Cerebellum, 2024. 23(5): p. 1839-1847.
  22. Schols, L., et al., Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Genotype and phenotype in German kindreds. Arch Neurol, 1997. 54(9): p. 1073-80.
  23. Lastres-Becker, I., U. Rub, and G. Auburger, Spinocerebellar ataxia 2 (SCA2). Cerebellum, 2008. 7(2): p. 115-24.
  24. Freund, H.J., et al., Subthalamic-thalamic DBS in a case with spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 and severe tremor-A unusual clinical benefit. Mov Disord, 2007. 22(5): p. 732-5.
  25. Tuin, I., et al., Stages of sleep pathology in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2). Neurology, 2006. 67(11): p. 1966-72.
  26. Auburger, G.W., Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Handb Clin Neurol, 2012. 103: p. 423-36.
  27. Hoche, F., et al., Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2): identification of early brain degeneration in one monozygous twin in the initial disease stage. Cerebellum, 2011. 10(2): p. 245-53.
  28. Rub, U., et al., Clinical features, neurogenetics and neuropathology of the polyglutamine spinocerebellar ataxias type 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Prog Neurobiol, 2013. 104: p. 38-66.
  29. Yagishita, S. and M. Inoue, Clinicopathology of spinocerebellar degeneration: its correlation to the unstable CAG repeat of the affected gene. Pathol Int, 1997. 47(1): p. 1-15.
  30. Mizushima, K., et al., Analysis of spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 in Gunma Prefecture in Japan: CAG trinucleotide expansion and clinical characteristics. J Neurol Sci, 1998. 156(2): p. 180-5.
  31. Yokota, T., et al., Electrophysiological features of central motor conduction in spinocerebellar atrophy type 1, type 2, and Machado-Joseph disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1998. 65(4): p. 530-4.
  32. Durr, A., et al., Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type I linked to chromosome 12q (SCA2: spinocerebellar ataxia type 2). Clin Neurosci, 1995. 3(1): p. 12-6.
  33. Rivaud-Pechoux, S., et al., Eye movement abnormalities correlate with genotype in autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type I. Ann Neurol, 1998. 43(3): p. 297-302.
  34. Cancel, G., et al., Molecular and clinical correlations in spinocerebellar ataxia 2: a study of 32 families. Hum Mol Genet, 1997. 6(5): p. 709-15.
  35. Durr, A., et al., Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type I in Martinique (French West Indies). Clinical and neuropathological analysis of 53 patients from three unrelated SCA2 families. Brain, 1995. 118 ( Pt 6): p. 1573-81.
  36. Giunti, P., et al., The role of the SCA2 trinucleotide repeat expansion in 89 autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia families. Frequency, clinical and genetic correlates. Brain, 1998. 121 ( Pt 3): p. 459-67.
  37. Wadia, N., et al., A clinicogenetic analysis of six Indian spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA2) pedigrees. The significance of slow saccades in diagnosis. Brain, 1998. 121 ( Pt 12): p. 2341-55.
  38. Pang, J., et al., A common disease haplotype segregating in spinocerebellar ataxia 2 (SCA2) pedigrees of diverse ethnic origin. Eur J Hum Genet, 1999. 7(7): p. 841-5.
  39. Zhou, Y.X., et al., Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 in China: molecular analysis and genotype-phenotype correlation in nine families. Neurology, 1998. 51(2): p. 595-8.
  40. Buttner, N., et al., Oculomotor phenotypes in autosomal dominant ataxias. Arch Neurol, 1998. 55(10): p. 1353-7.
  41. Babovic-Vuksanovic, D., et al., Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA 2) in an infant with extreme CAG repeat expansion. Am J Med Genet, 1998. 79(5): p. 383-7.
  42. Koeppen, A.H., The hereditary ataxias. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 1998. 57(6): p. 531-43.
  43. Adams, C., S. Starkman, and S.M. Pulst, Clinical and molecular analysis of a pedigree of southern Italian ancestry with spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Neurology, 1997. 49(4): p. 1163-6.
  44. Geschwind, D.H., et al., The prevalence and wide clinical spectrum of the spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 trinucleotide repeat in patients with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia. Am J Hum Genet, 1997. 60(4): p. 842-50.
  45. Paulson, H.L. and K.H. Fischbeck, Trinucleotide repeats in neurogenetic disorders. Annu Rev Neurosci, 1996. 19: p. 79-107.
  46. Subramony, S.H., Clinical aspects of hereditary ataxias. J Child Neurol, 1995. 10(5): p. 353-62.
  47. Sanpei, K., et al., Identification of the spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 gene using a direct identification of repeat expansion and cloning technique, DIRECT. Nat Genet, 1996. 14(3): p. 277-84.
  48. Imbert, G., et al., Cloning of the gene for spinocerebellar ataxia 2 reveals a locus with high sensitivity to expanded CAG/glutamine repeats. Nat Genet, 1996. 14(3): p. 285-91.
  49. Pulst, S.M., et al., Moderate expansion of a normally biallelic trinucleotide repeat in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Nat Genet, 1996. 14(3): p. 269-76.
  50. Elden, A.C., et al., Ataxin-2 intermediate-length polyglutamine expansions are associated with increased risk for ALS. Nature, 2010. 466(7310): p. 1069-75.
  51. Lee, T., et al., Ataxin-2 intermediate-length polyglutamine expansions in European ALS patients. Hum Mol Genet, 2011. 20(9): p. 1697-700.
  52. Gispert, S., et al., The modulation of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis risk by ataxin-2 intermediate polyglutamine expansions is a specific effect. Neurobiol Dis, 2012. 45(1): p. 356-61.
  53. Neuenschwander, A.G., et al., Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis risk for spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 ATXN2 CAG repeat alleles: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol, 2014. 71(12): p. 1529-34.
  54. Vieira de Sa, R., et al., ATAXIN-2 intermediate-length polyglutamine expansions elicit ALS-associated metabolic and immune phenotypes. Nat Commun, 2024. 15(1): p. 7484.
  55. Auburger, G.W.J., et al., Bioinformatic Analyses of the Ataxin-2 Family Since Algae Emphasize Its Small Isoforms, Large Chimerisms, and the Importance of Human Exon 1B as Target of Therapies to Prevent Neurodegeneration. Int J Mol Sci, 2026. 27(3).
  56. Satterfield, T.F., S.M. Jackson, and L.J. Pallanck, A Drosophila homolog of the polyglutamine disease gene SCA2 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of actin filament formation. Genetics, 2002. 162(4): p. 1687-702.
  57. Albrecht, M., et al., Structural and functional analysis of ataxin-2 and ataxin-3. Eur J Biochem, 2004. 271(15): p. 3155-70.
  58. Jimenez-Lopez, D. and P. Guzman, Insights into the evolution and domain structure of Ataxin-2 proteins across eukaryotes. BMC Res Notes, 2014. 7: p. 453.
  59. Auburger, G., et al., Efficient Prevention of Neurodegenerative Diseases by Depletion of Starvation Response Factor Ataxin-2. Trends Neurosci, 2017. 40(8): p. 507-516.
  60. Boeynaems, S., et al., Poly(A)-binding protein is an ataxin-2 chaperone that regulates biomolecular condensates. Mol Cell, 2023. 83(12): p. 2020-2034 e6.
  61. Bakthavachalu, B., et al., RNP-Granule Assembly via Ataxin-2 Disordered Domains Is Required for Long-Term Memory and Neurodegeneration. Neuron, 2018. 98(4): p. 754-766 e4.
  62. Yokoshi, M., et al., Direct binding of Ataxin-2 to distinct elements in 3’ UTRs promotes mRNA stability and protein expression. Mol Cell, 2014. 55(2): p. 186-98.
  63. Nonhoff, U., et al., Ataxin-2 interacts with the DEAD/H-box RNA helicase DDX6 and interferes with P-bodies and stress granules. Mol Biol Cell, 2007. 18(4): p. 1385-96.
  64. Wang, J.Y., et al., PolyQ-expanded ataxin-2 aggregation impairs cellular processing-body homeostasis via sequestering the RNA helicase DDX6. J Biol Chem, 2024. 300(7): p. 107413.
  65. Damrath, E., et al., ATXN2-CAG42 sequesters PABPC1 into insolubility and induces FBXW8 in cerebellum of old ataxic knock-in mice. PLoS Genet, 2012. 8(8): p. e1002920.
  66. Key, J., et al., Mid-Gestation lethality of Atxn2l-Ablated Mice. Int J Mol Sci, 2020. 21(14).
  67. Key, J., et al., ATXN2L primarily interacts with NUFIP2, the absence of ATXN2L results in NUFIP2 depletion, and the ATXN2-polyQ expansion triggers NUFIP2 accumulation. Neurobiol Dis, 2025. 209: p. 106903.
  68. Key, J., et al., Conditional ATXN2L-Null in Adult Frontal Cortex CamK2a+ Neurons Does Not Cause Cell Death but Restricts Spontaneous Mobility and Affects the Alternative Splicing Pathway. Cells, 2025. 14(19).
  69. Lastres-Becker, I., et al., Insulin receptor and lipid metabolism pathology in ataxin-2 knock-out mice. Hum Mol Genet, 2008. 17(10): p. 1465-81.
  70. Lastres-Becker, I., et al., Mammalian ataxin-2 modulates translation control at the pre-initiation complex via PI3K/mTOR and is induced by starvation. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2016. 1862(9): p. 1558-69.
  71. Kiehl, T.R., et al., Generation and characterization of Sca2 (ataxin-2) knockout mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2006. 339(1): p. 17-24.
  72. Fittschen, M., et al., Genetic ablation of ataxin-2 increases several global translation factors in their transcript abundance but decreases translation rate. Neurogenetics, 2015. 16(3): p. 181-92.
  73. Ciosk, R., M. DePalma, and J.R. Priess, ATX-2, the C. elegans ortholog of ataxin 2, functions in translational regulation in the germline. Development, 2004. 131(19): p. 4831-41.
  74. Kiehl, T.R., H. Shibata, and S.M. Pulst, The ortholog of human ataxin-2 is essential for early embryonic patterning in C. elegans. J Mol Neurosci, 2000. 15(3): p. 231-41.
  75. Bar, D.Z., et al., Cell size and fat content of dietary-restricted Caenorhabditis elegans are regulated by ATX-2, an mTOR repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2016. 113(32): p. E4620-9.
  76. Lim, C. and R. Allada, ATAXIN-2 activates PERIOD translation to sustain circadian rhythms in Drosophila. Science, 2013. 340(6134): p. 875-9.
  77. McCann, C., et al., The Ataxin-2 protein is required for microRNA function and synapse-specific long-term olfactory habituation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2011. 108(36): p. E655-62.
  78. Lee, J., et al., LSM12 and ME31B/DDX6 Define Distinct Modes of Posttranscriptional Regulation by ATAXIN-2 Protein Complex in Drosophila Circadian Pacemaker Neurons. Mol Cell, 2017. 66(1): p. 129-140 e7.
  79. Zhang, Y., et al., A role for Drosophila ATX2 in activation of PER translation and circadian behavior. Science, 2013. 340(6134): p. 879-82.
  80. Kimura, Y., K. Irie, and K. Irie, Pbp1 is involved in Ccr4- and Khd1-mediated regulation of cell growth through association with ribosomal proteins Rpl12a and Rpl12b. Eukaryot Cell, 2013. 12(6): p. 864-74.
  81. Swisher, K.D. and R. Parker, Localization to, and effects of Pbp1, Pbp4, Lsm12, Dhh1, and Pab1 on stress granules in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One, 2010. 5(4): p. e10006.
  82. Meierhofer, D., et al., Ataxin-2 (Atxn2)-Knock-Out Mice Show Branched Chain Amino Acids and Fatty Acids Pathway Alterations. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2016. 15(5): p. 1728-39.
  83. Seidel, G., et al., Quantitative Global Proteomics of Yeast PBP1 Deletion Mutants and Their Stress Responses Identifies Glucose Metabolism, Mitochondrial, and Stress Granule Changes. J Proteome Res, 2017. 16(2): p. 504-515.
  84. van de Loo, S., et al., Ataxin-2 associates with rough endoplasmic reticulum. Exp Neurol, 2009. 215(1): p. 110-8.
  85. Satterfield, T.F. and L.J. Pallanck, Ataxin-2 and its Drosophila homolog, ATX2, physically assemble with polyribosomes. Hum Mol Genet, 2006. 15(16): p. 2523-32.
  86. Dansithong, W., et al., Ataxin-2 regulates RGS8 translation in a new BAC-SCA2 transgenic mouse model. PLoS Genet, 2015. 11(4): p. e1005182.
  87. van de Poll, F., et al., Pbp1 associates with Puf3 and promotes translation of its target mRNAs involved in mitochondrial biogenesis. PLoS Genet, 2023. 19(5): p. e1010774.
  88. Lopez-Juarez, Z.M., L. Aguilar-Henonin, and P. Guzman, The ATXN2 Orthologs CID3 and CID4, Act Redundantly to In-Fluence Developmental Pathways throughout the Life Cycle of Arabidopsis thaliana. Int J Mol Sci, 2021. 22(6).
  89. Kaehler, C., et al., Ataxin-2-like is a regulator of stress granules and processing bodies. PLoS One, 2012. 7(11): p. e50134.
  90. Sen, N.E., et al., Search for SCA2 blood RNA biomarkers highlights Ataxin-2 as strong modifier of the mitochondrial factor PINK1 levels. Neurobiol Dis, 2016. 96: p. 115-126.
  91. Zhang, K., et al., Stress Granule Assembly Disrupts Nucleocytoplasmic Transport. Cell, 2018. 173(4): p. 958-971 e17.
  92. Yamagishi, R., et al., Concerted action of ataxin-2 and PABPC1-bound mRNA poly(A) tail in the formation of stress granules. Nucleic Acids Res, 2024. 52(15): p. 9193-9209.
  93. Koppenol, R., et al., The stress granule protein G3BP1 alleviates spinocerebellar ataxia-associated deficits. Brain, 2023. 146(6): p. 2346-2363.
  94. Santos, C.C., et al., Fbxo42 promotes the degradation of Ataxin-2 granules to trigger terminal Xbp1 signaling. Nat Commun, 2025. 16(1): p. 7523.
  95. Del Castillo, U., et al., Ataxin-2 is essential for cytoskeletal dynamics and neurodevelopment in Drosophila. iScience, 2022. 25(1): p. 103536.
  96. Petrauskas, A., et al., Structured and disordered regions of Ataxin-2 contribute differently to the specificity and efficiency of mRNP granule formation. PLoS Genet, 2024. 20(5): p. e1011251.
  97. Singh, A., et al., Antagonistic roles for Ataxin-2 structured and disordered domains in RNP condensation. Elife, 2021. 10.
  98. Sudhakaran, I.P., et al., FMRP and Ataxin-2 function together in long-term olfactory habituation and neuronal translational control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014. 111(1): p. E99-E108.
  99. Paul, S., et al., Cerebellar Micro-RNA Profile in a Mouse Model of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2. Neurol Genet, 2024. 10(2): p. e200144.
  100. Sen, N.E., et al., Generation of an Atxn2-CAG100 knock-in mouse reveals N-acetylaspartate production deficit due to early Nat8l dysregulation. Neurobiol Dis, 2019. 132: p. 104559.
  101. Canet-Pons, J., et al., Atxn2-CAG100-KnockIn mouse spinal cord shows progressive TDP43 pathology associated with cholesterol biosynthesis suppression. Neurobiol Dis, 2021. 152: p. 105289.
  102. Leites, E.P. and V.A. Morais, Protocol for the isolation and culture of microglia, astrocytes, and neurons from the same mouse brain. STAR Protoc, 2024. 5(1): p. 102869.
  103. Flury, A., et al., Evolving insights into the identity and function of dark microglia. Trends Neurosci, 2026. 49(1): p. 20-34.
  104. Hume, D.A., Life without microglia. Trends Neurosci, 2025. 48(8): p. 560-569.
  105. Pereira-Iglesias, M., et al., Microglia as hunters or gatherers of brain synapses. Nat Neurosci, 2025. 28(1): p. 15-23.
  106. Arranz, A.M. and B. De Strooper, The role of astroglia in Alzheimer’s disease: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Lancet Neurol, 2019. 18(4): p. 406-414.
  107. Allen, N.J. and D.A. Lyons, Glia as architects of central nervous system formation and function. Science, 2018. 362(6411): p. 181-185.
  108. Slezak, M., F.W. Pfrieger, and Z. Soltys, Synaptic plasticity, astrocytes and morphological homeostasis. J Physiol Paris, 2006. 99(2-3): p. 84-91.
  109. Houmam, S., et al., Protocol to sequentially isolate mouse oligodendrocytes, microglia, endothelial cells, astrocytes, and neurons via magnetic cell sorting. STAR Protoc, 2025. 6(4): p. 104139.
  110. Clarke, L.E., et al., Normal aging induces A1-like astrocyte reactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2018. 115(8): p. E1896-E1905.
  111. Bouza, A.A. and L.L. Isom, Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel beta Subunits and Their Related Diseases. Handb Exp Pharmacol, 2018. 246: p. 423-450.
  112. Chen, S., et al., Regulation of SPARC family proteins in disorders of the central nervous system. Brain Res Bull, 2020. 163: p. 178-189.
  113. Morel, M., K.N. Shah, and W. Long, The F-box protein FBXL16 up-regulates the stability of C-MYC oncoprotein by antagonizing the activity of the F-box protein FBW7. J Biol Chem, 2020. 295(23): p. 7970-7980.
  114. Schonkeren, S.L., et al., Nervous NDRGs: the N-myc downstream-regulated gene family in the central and peripheral nervous system. Neurogenetics, 2019. 20(4): p. 173-186.
  115. Lin, X., et al., LncRNA MEG8 ameliorates Parkinson’s disease neuro-inflammation through miR-485-3p/FBXO45 axis. Acta Neurol Belg, 2024. 124(2): p. 549-557.
  116. Genetic Modifiers of Huntington’s Disease, C., Identification of Genetic Factors that Modify Clinical Onset of Huntington’s Disease. Cell, 2015. 162(3): p. 516-26.
  117. Loupe, J.M., et al., Promotion of somatic CAG repeat expansion by Fan1 knock-out in Huntington’s disease knock-in mice is blocked by Mlh1 knock-out. Hum Mol Genet, 2020. 29(18): p. 3044-3053.
  118. McAllister, B., et al., Exome sequencing of individuals with Huntington’s disease implicates FAN1 nuclease activity in slowing CAG expansion and disease onset. Nat Neurosci, 2022. 25(4): p. 446-457.
  119. Kam, T.I., et al., Microglia and astrocyte dysfunction in parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis, 2020. 144: p. 105028.
  120. Mendonca, P., E. Taka, and K.F.A. Soliman, Proteomic analysis of the effect of the polyphenol pentagalloyl glucose on proteins involved in neurodegenerative diseases in activated BV-2 microglial cells. Mol Med Rep, 2019. 20(2): p. 1736-1746.
  121. Capuz, A., et al., Astrocytes express aberrant immunoglobulins as putative gatekeeper of astrocytes to neuronal progenitor conversion. Cell Death Dis, 2023. 14(4): p. 237.
  122. Almaguer-Mederos, L.E., et al., Multiomics approach identifies SERPINB1 as candidate biomarker for spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Sci Rep, 2025. 15(1): p. 42559.
  123. Scoles, D.R., et al., ALS-associated genes in SCA2 mouse spinal cord transcriptomes. Hum Mol Genet, 2020. 29(10): p. 1658-1672.
  124. Sen, N.E., et al., In Human and Mouse Spino-Cerebellar Tissue, Ataxin-2 Expansion Affects Ceramide-Sphingomyelin Metabolism. Int J Mol Sci, 2019. 20(23).
  125. Pflieger, L.T., et al., Gene co-expression network analysis for identifying modules and functionally enriched pathways in SCA2. Hum Mol Genet, 2017. 26(16): p. 3069-3080.
  126. Halbach, M.V., et al., Atxn2 Knockout and CAG42-Knock-in Cerebellum Shows Similarly Dysregulated Expression in Calcium Homeostasis Pathway. Cerebellum, 2017. 16(1): p. 68-81.
  127. Halbach, M.V., et al., Both ubiquitin ligases FBXW8 and PARK2 are sequestrated into insolubility by ATXN2 PolyQ expansions, but only FBXW8 expression is dysregulated. PLoS One, 2015. 10(3): p. e0121089.
  128. Almaguer-Mederos, L.E., et al., Spinal Cord Phosphoproteome of SCA2 Mouse Model Reveals Alteration of ATXN2-N-Term PRM-SH3-Actin Interactome and of Autophagy. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2025. 24(11): p. 101072.
  129. Diaz-Ortiz, M.E., et al., GPNMB confers risk for Parkinson’s disease through interaction with alpha-synuclein. Science, 2022. 377(6608): p. eabk0637.
  130. Huttenrauch, M., et al., Glycoprotein NMB: a novel Alzheimer’s disease associated marker expressed in a subset of activated microglia. Acta Neuropathol Commun, 2018. 6(1): p. 108.
  131. Li, X., et al., GPNMB Modulates Autophagy to Enhance Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury in Rats. Cell Transplant, 2024. 33: p. 9636897241233040.
  132. Zhang, X., et al., Repair-associated macrophages increase after early-phase microglia attenuation to promote ischemic stroke recovery. Nat Commun, 2025. 16(1): p. 3089.
  133. Li, J., et al., Exploring the factors underlying remyelination arrest by studying the post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of cystatin F gene. J Neurochem, 2021. 157(6): p. 2070-2090.
  134. Rasmussen, J., et al., An early proinflammatory transcriptional response to tau pathology is age-specific and foreshadows reduced tau burden. Brain Pathol, 2022. 32(3): p. e13018.
  135. Zhou, H., et al., Integrating Bulk and Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data to Identify Ferroptosis-Associated Inflammatory Gene in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Inflamm Res, 2025. 18: p. 2105-2122.
  136. Yin, Z., et al., APOE4 impairs the microglial response in Alzheimer’s disease by inducing TGFbeta-mediated checkpoints. Nat Immunol, 2023. 24(11): p. 1839-1853.
  137. Arutyunov, A., et al., West Nile Virus-Induced Expression of Senescent Gene Lgals3bp Regulates Microglial Phenotype within Cerebral Cortex. Biomolecules, 2024. 14(7).
  138. Kohno, K., et al., A spinal microglia population involved in remitting and relapsing neuropathic pain. Science, 2022. 376(6588): p. 86-90.
  139. De Schepper, S., et al., Perivascular cells induce microglial phagocytic states and synaptic engulfment via SPP1 in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Neurosci, 2023. 26(3): p. 406-415.
  140. Nguyen, A.T., et al., APOE and TREM2 regulate amyloid-responsive microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol, 2020. 140(4): p. 477-493.
  141. Huang, Y., et al., Microglia use TAM receptors to detect and engulf amyloid beta plaques. Nat Immunol, 2021. 22(5): p. 586-594.
  142. Schwabenland, M., et al., Loss of USP18 in microglia induces white matter pathology. Acta Neuropathol Commun, 2019. 7(1): p. 106.
  143. Wu, Z., et al., Abeta Induces Neuroinflammation and Microglial M1 Polarization via cGAS-STING-IFITM3 Signaling Pathway in BV-2 Cells. Neurochem Res, 2023. 48(9): p. 2881-2894.
  144. Li, W., et al., Rnf-213 Knockout Induces Pericyte Reduction and Blood-Brain Barrier Impairment in Mouse. Mol Neurobiol, 2023. 60(11): p. 6188-6200.
  145. Negrutskii, B.S., et al., The eEF1 family of mammalian translation elongation factors. BBA Adv, 2023. 3: p. 100067.
  146. Biembengut, I.V., et al., Cytoplasmic FMR1 interacting protein (CYFIP) family members and their function in neural development and disorders. Mol Biol Rep, 2021. 48(8): p. 6131-6143.
  147. Zhang, S., et al., The LSmAD Domain of Ataxin-2 Modulates the Structure and RNA Binding of Its Preceding LSm Domain. Cells, 2025. 14(5).
  148. Achsel, T., H. Stark, and R. Luhrmann, The Sm domain is an ancient RNA-binding motif with oligo(U) specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2001. 98(7): p. 3685-9.
  149. Weichenrieder, O., RNA binding by Hfq and ring-forming (L)Sm proteins: a trade-off between optimal sequence readout and RNA backbone conformation. RNA Biol, 2014. 11(5): p. 537-49.
  150. Mu, L., et al., Interconversion and mechanisms between Lsm-type and Sm-type heteroheptameric rings: implications for spliceosome evolution and RNA metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res, 2025. 53(10).
  151. Kaida, D., et al., U1 snRNP protects pre-mRNAs from premature cleavage and polyadenylation. Nature, 2010. 468(7324): p. 664-8.
  152. Cohen, J.B., S.D. Broz, and A.D. Levinson, U1 small nuclear RNAs with altered specificity can be stably expressed in mammalian cells and promote permanent changes in pre-mRNA splicing. Mol Cell Biol, 1993. 13(5): p. 2666-76.
  153. Gadgil, A., et al., ALS-linked FUS mutants affect the localization of U7 snRNP and replication-dependent histone gene expression in human cells. Sci Rep, 2021. 11(1): p. 11868.
  154. Nakashima, T., et al., Diversity of U1 Small Nuclear RNAs and Diagnostic Methods for Their Mutations. Cancer Sci, 2025. 116(8): p. 2270-2280.
  155. Suzuki, H., et al., Recurrent noncoding U1 snRNA mutations drive cryptic splicing in SHH medulloblastoma. Nature, 2019. 574(7780): p. 707-711.
  156. Nojima, H. and R.D. Kornberg, Genes and pseudogenes for mouse U1 and U2 small nuclear RNAs. J Biol Chem, 1983. 258(13): p. 8151-5.
  157. Kato, N. and F. Harada, New U1 RNA species found in Friend SFFV (spleen focus forming virus)-transformed mouse cells. J Biol Chem, 1985. 260(12): p. 7775-82.
  158. Howard, E.F., et al., Functional, developmentally expressed genes for mouse U1a and U1b snRNAs contain both conserved and non-conserved transcription signals. Nucleic Acids Res, 1986. 14(24): p. 9811-25.
  159. Lund, E., J.E. Dahlberg, and D.J. Forbes, The two embryonic U1 small nuclear RNAs of Xenopus laevis are encoded by a major family of tandemly repeated genes. Mol Cell Biol, 1984. 4(12): p. 2580-6.
  160. Marzluff, W.F., et al., Isolation and characterization of two linked mouse U1b small nuclear RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res, 1983. 11(18): p. 6255-70.
  161. Lund, E., B. Kahan, and J.E. Dahlberg, Differential control of U1 small nuclear RNA expression during mouse development. Science, 1985. 229(4719): p. 1271-4.
  162. Forbes, D.J., et al., Differential expression of multiple U1 small nuclear RNAs in oocytes and embryos of Xenopus laevis. Cell, 1984. 38(3): p. 681-9.
  163. Lund, E. and J.E. Dahlberg, Differential accumulation of U1 and U4 small nuclear RNAs during Xenopus development. Genes Dev, 1987. 1(1): p. 39-46.
  164. Liu, J.L. and J.G. Gall, U bodies are cytoplasmic structures that contain uridine-rich small nuclear ribonucleoproteins and associate with P bodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007. 104(28): p. 11655-9.
  165. Buckingham, M. and J.L. Liu, U bodies respond to nutrient stress in Drosophila. Exp Cell Res, 2011. 317(20): p. 2835-44.
  166. Tsalikis, J., et al., Intracellular Bacterial Pathogens Trigger the Formation of U Small Nuclear RNA Bodies (U Bodies) through Metabolic Stress Induction. J Biol Chem, 2015. 290(34): p. 20904-20918.
  167. Lee, L., S.E. Davies, and J.L. Liu, The spinal muscular atrophy protein SMN affects Drosophila germline nuclear organization through the U body-P body pathway. Dev Biol, 2009. 332(1): p. 142-55.
  168. Patel, S.B. and M. Bellini, The assembly of a spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle. Nucleic Acids Res, 2008. 36(20): p. 6482-93.
  169. Hamm, J., et al., The trimethylguanosine cap structure of U1 snRNA is a component of a bipartite nuclear targeting signal. Cell, 1990. 62(3): p. 569-77.
  170. Hyjek, M., et al., Spatial regulation of cytoplasmic snRNP assembly at the cellular level. J Exp Bot, 2015. 66(22): p. 7019-30.
  171. Rossoll, W., et al., Smn, the spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene product, modulates axon growth and localization of beta-actin mRNA in growth cones of motoneurons. J Cell Biol, 2003. 163(4): p. 801-12.
  172. Eggert, C., et al., Spinal muscular atrophy: the RNP connection. Trends Mol Med, 2006. 12(3): p. 113-21.
  173. Piazzon, N., et al., In vitro and in cellulo evidences for association of the survival of motor neuron complex with the fragile X mental retardation protein. J Biol Chem, 2008. 283(9): p. 5598-610.
  174. Baumer, D., et al., Alternative splicing events are a late feature of pathology in a mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy. PLoS Genet, 2009. 5(12): p. e1000773.
  175. Tapia, O., et al., Cellular bases of the RNA metabolism dysfunction in motor neurons of a murine model of spinal muscular atrophy: Role of Cajal bodies and the nucleolus. Neurobiol Dis, 2017. 108: p. 83-99.
  176. Beattie, C.E. and S.J. Kolb, Spinal muscular atrophy: Selective motor neuron loss and global defect in the assembly of ribonucleoproteins. Brain Res, 2018. 1693(Pt A): p. 92-97.
  177. Koyano, S., et al., Parallel Appearance of Polyglutamine and Transactivation-Responsive DNA-Binding Protein 43 and Their Complementary Subcellular Localization in Brains of Patients With Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 2022. 81(7): p. 535-544.
  178. van de Warrenburg, B.P., et al., Peripheral nerve involvement in spinocerebellar ataxias. Arch Neurol, 2004. 61(2): p. 257-61.
  179. Abele, M., et al., Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type I. Nerve conduction and evoked potential studies in families with SCA1, SCA2 and SCA3. Brain, 1997. 120 ( Pt 12): p. 2141-8.
  180. Shin, M.S., et al., U1-small nuclear ribonucleoprotein activates the NLRP3 inflammasome in human monocytes. J Immunol, 2012. 188(10): p. 4769-75.
  181. Somarelli, J.A., et al., Epitope mapping of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and mixed connective tissue disease. Lupus, 2011. 20(3): p. 274-89.
  182. Sato, T., et al., Anti-U1 RNP antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid are associated with central neuropsychiatric manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus and mixed connective tissue disease. Arthritis Rheum, 2010. 62(12): p. 3730-40.
  183. Nadeu, F., et al., Disease-specific U1 spliceosomal RNA mutations in mature B-cell neoplasms. Leukemia, 2025. 39(9): p. 2076-2086.
  184. Cheng, Z., et al., Overexpression of U1 snRNA induces decrease of U1 spliceosome function associated with Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurogenet, 2017. 31(4): p. 337-343.
  185. Dong, X., et al., Small Nuclear RNAs (U1, U2, U5) in Tumor-Educated Platelets Are Downregulated and Act as Promising Biomarkers in Lung Cancer. Front Oncol, 2020. 10: p. 1627.
  186. Pigini, P., F.M. Giorgi, and K.B. Wee, Utargetome: A targetome prediction tool for modified U1-snRNAs to identify distal-target positions with improved selectivity. PLoS Comput Biol, 2025. 21(9): p. e1013534.
  187. Peretto, L., et al., Rescue of a panel of Hemophilia A-causing 5’ss splicing mutations by unique Exon-specific U1snRNA variants. Mol Med, 2025. 31(1): p. 121.
  188. Goncalves, M., et al., Development of Engineered-U1 snRNA Therapies: Current Status. Int J Mol Sci, 2023. 24(19).
  189. Romano, G., et al., Rescue of a familial dysautonomia mouse model by AAV9-Exon-specific U1 snRNA. Am J Hum Genet, 2022. 109(8): p. 1534-1548.
  190. Hatch, S.T., A.A. Smargon, and G.W. Yeo, Engineered U1 snRNAs to modulate alternatively spliced exons. Methods, 2022. 205: p. 140-148.
  191. Donega, S., et al., Rescue of common exon-skipping mutations in cystic fibrosis with modified U1 snRNAs. Hum Mutat, 2020. 41(12): p. 2143-2154.
  192. Breuel, S., et al., Combining Engineered U1 snRNA and Antisense Oligonucleotides to Improve the Treatment of a BBS1 Splice Site Mutation. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids, 2019. 18: p. 123-130.
  193. Rogalska, M.E., et al., Therapeutic activity of modified U1 core spliceosomal particles. Nat Commun, 2016. 7: p. 11168.
  194. Liu, S., et al., The network of protein-protein interactions within the human U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP. RNA, 2006. 12(7): p. 1418-30.
  195. Zhang, X., et al., An Atomic Structure of the Human Spliceosome. Cell, 2017. 169(5): p. 918-929 e14.
  196. Zhang, X., et al., Structure of the human activated spliceosome in three conformational states. Cell Res, 2018. 28(3): p. 307-322.
  197. Yang, G., et al., Spliceosomal GTPase Eftud2 deficiency-triggered ferroptosis leads to Purkinje cell degeneration. Neuron, 2024. 112(20): p. 3452-3469 e9.
  198. Park, B.Y., et al., The Core Splicing Factors EFTUD2, SNRPB and TXNL4A Are Essential for Neural Crest and Craniofacial Development. J Dev Biol, 2022. 10(3).
  199. Boudreault, S., G. Lemay, and M. Bisaillon, U5 snRNP Core Proteins Are Key Components of the Defense Response against Viral Infection through Their Roles in Programmed Cell Death and Interferon Induction. Viruses, 2022. 14(12).
  200. De Arras, L., et al., Comparative genomics RNAi screen identifies Eftud2 as a novel regulator of innate immunity. Genetics, 2014. 197(2): p. 485-96.
  201. Lu, W., et al., Nesprin interchain associations control nuclear size. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2012. 69(20): p. 3493-509.
  202. Xu, S., et al., O-GlcNAcylation reduces proteome solubility and regulates the formation of biomolecular condensates in human cells. Nat Commun, 2025. 16(1): p. 4068.
  203. Zhang, X., et al., Syne-1 and Syne-2 play crucial roles in myonuclear anchorage and motor neuron innervation. Development, 2007. 134(5): p. 901-8.
  204. Yu, J., et al., KASH protein Syne-2/Nesprin-2 and SUN proteins SUN1/2 mediate nuclear migration during mammalian retinal development. Hum Mol Genet, 2011. 20(6): p. 1061-73.
  205. Luke, Y., et al., Nesprin-2 Giant (NUANCE) maintains nuclear envelope architecture and composition in skin. J Cell Sci, 2008. 121(11): p. 1887-98.
  206. Zhang, Q., et al., Nesprin-2 is a multi-isomeric protein that binds lamin and emerin at the nuclear envelope and forms a subcellular network in skeletal muscle. J Cell Sci, 2005. 118(Pt 4): p. 673-87.
  207. Dawe, H.R., et al., Nesprin-2 interacts with meckelin and mediates ciliogenesis via remodelling of the actin cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci, 2009. 122(Pt 15): p. 2716-26.
  208. Zhang, X., et al., SUN1/2 and Syne/Nesprin-1/2 complexes connect centrosome to the nucleus during neurogenesis and neuronal migration in mice. Neuron, 2009. 64(2): p. 173-87.
  209. Synofzik, M., et al., SYNE1 ataxia is a common recessive ataxia with major non-cerebellar features: a large multi-centre study. Brain, 2016. 139(Pt 5): p. 1378-93.
  210. Senghor, H.V.F., et al., SYNE1 Deficiency Manifesting Primarily With Motor Neuron Disease. Neurol Genet, 2025. 11(6): p. e200306.
  211. Bonnycastle, K., P.C. Kind, and M.A. Cousin, FMRP Sustains Presynaptic Function via Control of Activity-Dependent Bulk Endocytosis. J Neurosci, 2022. 42(8): p. 1618-1628.
  212. Ceman, S., R. Nelson, and S.T. Warren, Identification of mouse YB1/p50 as a component of the FMRP-associated mRNP particle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2000. 279(3): p. 904-8.
  213. Malone, T.J., et al., Neuronal potassium channel activity triggers initiation of mRNA translation through binding of translation regulators. Sci Adv, 2025. 11(22): p. eadv3140.
  214. Zhang, Y., Y. Lee, and K. Han, Neuronal function and dysfunction of CYFIP2: from actin dynamics to early infantile epileptic encephalopathy. BMB Rep, 2019. 52(5): p. 304-311.
  215. Cioni, J.M., et al., Axon-Axon Interactions Regulate Topographic Optic Tract Sorting via CYFIP2-Dependent WAVE Complex Function. Neuron, 2018. 97(5): p. 1078-1093 e6.
  216. Santini, E., et al., Reducing eIF4E-eIF4G interactions restores the balance between protein synthesis and actin dynamics in fragile X syndrome model mice. Sci Signal, 2017. 10(504).
  217. Bardoni, B., A. Schenck, and J.L. Mandel, A novel RNA-binding nuclear protein that interacts with the fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) protein. Hum Mol Genet, 1999. 8(13): p. 2557-66.
  218. Bardoni, B., et al., NUFIP1 (nuclear FMRP interacting protein 1) is a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein associated with active synaptoneurosomes. Exp Cell Res, 2003. 289(1): p. 95-107.
  219. Taha, M.S., et al., Novel FMRP interaction networks linked to cellular stress. FEBS J, 2021. 288(3): p. 837-860.
  220. Jia, J., et al., Membrane Atg8ylation, stress granule formation, and MTOR regulation during lysosomal damage. Autophagy, 2023. 19(6): p. 1893-1895.
  221. Ramos, A., et al., The structure of the N-terminal domain of the fragile X mental retardation protein: a platform for protein-protein interaction. Structure, 2006. 14(1): p. 21-31.
  222. Bardoni, B., et al., 82-FIP, a novel FMRP (fragile X mental retardation protein) interacting protein, shows a cell cycle-dependent intracellular localization. Hum Mol Genet, 2003. 12(14): p. 1689-98.
  223. Tan, W., et al., Zfrp8 forms a complex with fragile-X mental retardation protein and regulates its localization and function. Dev Biol, 2016. 410(2): p. 202-212.
  224. Schenck, A., et al., A highly conserved protein family interacting with the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) and displaying selective interactions with FMRP-related proteins FXR1P and FXR2P. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2001. 98(15): p. 8844-9.
  225. Abekhoukh, S., et al., New insights into the regulatory function of CYFIP1 in the context of WAVE- and FMRP-containing complexes. Dis Model Mech, 2017. 10(4): p. 463-474.
  226. Richter, J.D. and X. Zhao, The molecular biology of FMRP: new insights into fragile X syndrome. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2021. 22(4): p. 209-222.
  227. La Via, L., et al., Functional impact of CYFIP2 RNA editing on actin regulation, axon growth, and spinogenesis. Neurochem Int, 2025. 191: p. 106084.
  228. Kim, N.S., et al., CYFIP1 Dosages Exhibit Divergent Behavioral Impact via Diametric Regulation of NMDA Receptor Complex Translation in Mouse Models of Psychiatric Disorders. Biol Psychiatry, 2022. 92(10): p. 815-826.
  229. Majumder, P., et al., Co-regulation of mRNA translation by TDP-43 and Fragile X Syndrome protein FMRP. Acta Neuropathol, 2016. 132(5): p. 721-738.
  230. Di Marino, D., et al., A unique binding mode of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E for guiding the design of novel peptide inhibitors. Protein Sci, 2015. 24(9): p. 1370-82.
  231. Genheden, M., et al., BDNF stimulation of protein synthesis in cortical neurons requires the MAP kinase-interacting kinase MNK1. J Neurosci, 2015. 35(3): p. 972-84.
  232. Oguro-Ando, A., et al., Increased CYFIP1 dosage alters cellular and dendritic morphology and dysregulates mTOR. Mol Psychiatry, 2015. 20(9): p. 1069-78.
  233. De Rubeis, S., et al., CYFIP1 coordinates mRNA translation and cytoskeleton remodeling to ensure proper dendritic spine formation. Neuron, 2013. 79(6): p. 1169-82.
  234. Bozdagi, O., et al., Haploinsufficiency of Cyfip1 produces fragile X-like phenotypes in mice. PLoS One, 2012. 7(8): p. e42422.
  235. Napoli, I., et al., The fragile X syndrome protein represses activity-dependent translation through CYFIP1, a new 4E-BP. Cell, 2008. 134(6): p. 1042-54.
  236. Schenck, A., et al., CYFIP/Sra-1 controls neuronal connectivity in Drosophila and links the Rac1 GTPase pathway to the fragile X protein. Neuron, 2003. 38(6): p. 887-98.
  237. Stubenvoll, M.D., et al., ATX-2, the C. elegans Ortholog of Human Ataxin-2, Regulates Centrosome Size and Microtubule Dynamics. PLoS Genet, 2016. 12(9): p. e1006370.
  238. Cha, I.J., et al., Ataxin-2 Dysregulation Triggers a Compensatory Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein Decrease in Drosophila C4da Neurons. Mol Cells, 2020. 43(10): p. 870-879.
  239. Ikeda, Y., et al., Spectrin mutations cause spinocerebellar ataxia type 5. Nat Genet, 2006. 38(2): p. 184-90.
  240. Dick, K.A., et al., Spinocerebellar ataxia type 5. Handb Clin Neurol, 2012. 103: p. 451-9.
  241. Yildiz Bolukbasi, E., et al., Progressive SCAR14 with unclear speech, developmental delay, tremor, and behavioral problems caused by a homozygous deletion of the SPTBN2 pleckstrin homology domain. Am J Med Genet A, 2017. 173(9): p. 2494-2499.
  242. Nicita, F., et al., Heterozygous missense variants of SPTBN2 are a frequent cause of congenital cerebellar ataxia. Clin Genet, 2019. 96(2): p. 169-175.
  243. Perkins, E.M., et al., Posterior cerebellar Purkinje cells in an SCA5/SPARCA1 mouse model are especially vulnerable to the synergistic effect of loss of beta-III spectrin and GLAST. Hum Mol Genet, 2016. 25(20): p. 4448-4461.
  244. Armbrust, K.R., et al., Mutant beta-III spectrin causes mGluR1alpha mislocalization and functional deficits in a mouse model of spinocerebellar ataxia type 5. J Neurosci, 2014. 34(30): p. 9891-904.
  245. Bar, J., et al., Periodic F-actin structures shape the neck of dendritic spines. Sci Rep, 2016. 6: p. 37136.
  246. Pielage, J., R.D. Fetter, and G.W. Davis, A postsynaptic spectrin scaffold defines active zone size, spacing, and efficacy at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. J Cell Biol, 2006. 175(3): p. 491-503.
  247. Denha, S.A., et al., Molecular consequences of SCA5 mutations in the spectrin-repeat domains of beta-III-spectrin. J Biol Chem, 2025. 301(7): p. 110350.
  248. Salcedo-Sicilia, L., et al., betaIII spectrin regulates the structural integrity and the secretory protein transport of the Golgi complex. J Biol Chem, 2013. 288(4): p. 2157-66.
  249. Lorenzo, D.N., et al., Spectrin mutations that cause spinocerebellar ataxia type 5 impair axonal transport and induce neurodegeneration in Drosophila. J Cell Biol, 2010. 189(1): p. 143-58.
  250. Perkins, E., D. Suminaite, and M. Jackson, Cerebellar ataxias: beta-III spectrin’s interactions suggest common pathogenic pathways. J Physiol, 2016. 594(16): p. 4661-76.
  251. Gao, Y., et al., beta-III spectrin is critical for development of purkinje cell dendritic tree and spine morphogenesis. J Neurosci, 2011. 31(46): p. 16581-90.
  252. Machnicka, B., et al., Spectrins: a structural platform for stabilization and activation of membrane channels, receptors and transporters. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2014. 1838(2): p. 620-34.
  253. Hulsmeier, J., et al., Distinct functions of alpha-Spectrin and beta-Spectrin during axonal pathfinding. Development, 2007. 134(4): p. 713-22.
  254. Glineburg, M.R. and C. Nguyen, Diverse roles of stress-responsive RNP granules in oogenesis and infertility. Biol Reprod, 2025. 112(6): p. 1039-1053.
  255. van Leeuwen, W. and C. Rabouille, Cellular stress leads to the formation of membraneless stress assemblies in eukaryotic cells. Traffic, 2019. 20(9): p. 623-638.
  256. Ripin, N. and R. Parker, Formation, function, and pathology of RNP granules. Cell, 2023. 186(22): p. 4737-4756.
  257. Rub, U., et al., Anatomically based guidelines for systematic investigation of the central somatosensory system and their application to a spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) patient. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol, 2003. 29(5): p. 418-33.
  258. Restivo, D.A., et al., Central motor conduction to lower limb after transcranial magnetic stimulation in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2). Clin Neurophysiol, 2000. 111(4): p. 630-5.
  259. Stezin, A., et al., In vivo microstructural white matter changes in early spinocerebellar ataxia 2. Acta Neurol Scand, 2021. 143(3): p. 326-332.
  260. Velazquez-Perez, L., et al., Abnormal corticospinal tract function and motor cortex excitability in non-ataxic SCA2 mutation carriers: A TMS study. Clin Neurophysiol, 2016. 127(8): p. 2713-2719.
  261. Velazquez-Perez, L., et al., Progression of corticospinal tract dysfunction in pre-ataxic spinocerebellar ataxia type 2: A two-years follow-up TMS study. Clin Neurophysiol, 2018. 129(5): p. 895-900.
  262. Paciorkowski, A.R., et al., Massive expansion of SCA2 with autonomic dysfunction, retinitis pigmentosa, and infantile spasms. Neurology, 2011. 77(11): p. 1055-60.
  263. Chen, J.L., et al., Pseudouridylation-mediated gene expression modulation. Biochem J, 2024. 481(1): p. 1-16.
  264. Borchardt, E.K., N.M. Martinez, and W.V. Gilbert, Regulation and Function of RNA Pseudouridylation in Human Cells. Annu Rev Genet, 2020. 54: p. 309-336.
  265. Luo, N., et al., Functions and therapeutic applications of pseudouridylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2025. 26(9): p. 691-705.
  266. Weissman, D. and K. Kariko, mRNA: Fulfilling the Promise of Gene Therapy. Mol Ther, 2015. 23(9): p. 1416-7.
  267. Weissman, D., et al., HPLC purification of in vitro transcribed long RNA. Methods Mol Biol, 2013. 969: p. 43-54.
  268. Becker, L.A., et al., Therapeutic reduction of ataxin-2 extends lifespan and reduces pathology in TDP-43 mice. Nature, 2017. 544(7650): p. 367-371.
  269. Buenaventura, R.G., et al., Sequential Isolation of Microglia and Astrocytes from Young and Aged Adult Mouse Brains for Downstream Transcriptomic Analysis. Methods Protoc, 2022. 5(5).
  270. van Niekerk, E.A., et al., Methods for culturing adult CNS neurons reveal a CNS conditioning effect. Cell Rep Methods, 2022. 2(7): p. 100255.
  271. Livak, K.J. and T.D. Schmittgen, Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods, 2001. 25(4): p. 402-8.
Figure 2. Analysis of the brain and its cell types from Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice. (A) Statistical evaluation of brain weights from WT and Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice at ages of ~10 months (n=3). (B) Viable cell counts of microglia, astrocytes, and neurons from WT and Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice (n=3). Data are mean ± SEM, Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction, p < 0.05 ⁎, p < 0.01 ⁎⁎, p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Analysis of the brain and its cell types from Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice. (A) Statistical evaluation of brain weights from WT and Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice at ages of ~10 months (n=3). (B) Viable cell counts of microglia, astrocytes, and neurons from WT and Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice (n=3). Data are mean ± SEM, Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction, p < 0.05 ⁎, p < 0.01 ⁎⁎, p < 0.001.
Preprints 201069 g002
Figure 3. Purity validation of isolated microglia, astrocytes, and neurons. (A) Expression of specific markers in the gene sequencing data of 10-month-old mice. (B) Viable cell counts from 3-day-old wild-type mice (n=3). Data are mean ± SEM. (C) Immunofluorescence staining of microglia with IBA1, astrocytes with GFAP, and neurons with MAP2 after 5 days in culture. DAPI was used for staining the nucleus. Scale bar: 5 µM.
Figure 3. Purity validation of isolated microglia, astrocytes, and neurons. (A) Expression of specific markers in the gene sequencing data of 10-month-old mice. (B) Viable cell counts from 3-day-old wild-type mice (n=3). Data are mean ± SEM. (C) Immunofluorescence staining of microglia with IBA1, astrocytes with GFAP, and neurons with MAP2 after 5 days in culture. DAPI was used for staining the nucleus. Scale bar: 5 µM.
Preprints 201069 g003
Figure 4. Principal component analysis (PCA) of RNA-seq data from astrocytes, microglia, and neurons derived from WT and KIN mice. PC1 (49% variance) and PC2 (36% variance) are shown. This plot shows potential clusters based on gene expression.
Figure 4. Principal component analysis (PCA) of RNA-seq data from astrocytes, microglia, and neurons derived from WT and KIN mice. PC1 (49% variance) and PC2 (36% variance) are shown. This plot shows potential clusters based on gene expression.
Preprints 201069 g004
Figure 5. Volcano plots of different cell populations from 10-month-old Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mouse brains, showing log2-fold changes and -log10 (p-values) of all sequenced genes. Downregulations are shown in blue and upregulations in red color.
Figure 5. Volcano plots of different cell populations from 10-month-old Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mouse brains, showing log2-fold changes and -log10 (p-values) of all sequenced genes. Downregulations are shown in blue and upregulations in red color.
Preprints 201069 g005
Figure 6. (A): STRING protein-protein interaction diagram of all transcripts that are downregulated with consistency between brain compound, astroglial, and microglial fractions, upon RNA-seq of 10-month-old Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice. (B): STRING protein-protein interaction diagram of all transcripts that are upregulated with consistency between brain compound, astroglial, and microglial fractions, upon RNA-seq of 10-month-old Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice.
Figure 6. (A): STRING protein-protein interaction diagram of all transcripts that are downregulated with consistency between brain compound, astroglial, and microglial fractions, upon RNA-seq of 10-month-old Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice. (B): STRING protein-protein interaction diagram of all transcripts that are upregulated with consistency between brain compound, astroglial, and microglial fractions, upon RNA-seq of 10-month-old Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice.
Preprints 201069 g006
Table 1A. Consistency analysis between the new 10-month-old brain compound and cell-type-specific RNA-seq transcript profiles and previously reported 14-month-old spinal cord oligonucleotide microarray data, comparing all downregulations with nominal significance, in the global transcriptome of Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice.
Table 1A. Consistency analysis between the new 10-month-old brain compound and cell-type-specific RNA-seq transcript profiles and previously reported 14-month-old spinal cord oligonucleotide microarray data, comparing all downregulations with nominal significance, in the global transcriptome of Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice.
Preprints 201069 i001
Table 2A. Consistency analysis between new sRNA-seq profiles in astroglial and microglial fractions, comparing all downregulations with nominal significance, among antisense RNAs and processed pseudogenes of 10-month-old Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice.
Table 2A. Consistency analysis between new sRNA-seq profiles in astroglial and microglial fractions, comparing all downregulations with nominal significance, among antisense RNAs and processed pseudogenes of 10-month-old Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice.
Preprints 201069 i003
Table 3A. Strongest dysregulations in the new RNA-seq gene profile of microglial fraction, in the global transcriptome of 10-month-old Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice.
Table 3A. Strongest dysregulations in the new RNA-seq gene profile of microglial fraction, in the global transcriptome of 10-month-old Atxn2-CAG100-KIN mice.
Preprints 201069 i005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated