Submitted:
21 February 2026
Posted:
27 February 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
Introduction
1. Physics-Informed Descriptor Engineering
1.1. Descriptor Engineering Strategies
1.2. Hybrid Textural-Optimization and Outlier-Aware Predictive Modeling
1.3. Ensemble Interaction Mapping and Node-Affinity Hierarchies
2. High-Throughput Screening and Universal Property Prediction
2.1. High-Throughput Screening and Discovery
2.2. Universal Property Prediction and Isotherm Generalization
2.3. Property-Driven ML Applications
3. Model Interpretability and Thermodynamic Mapping
3.1. Model Interpretability and Physical Insight
3.2. Ensemble-Averaged Thermodynamics and Potential Energy Surface (PES) Mapping
4. Molecular Transport and Multicomponent Separation Mechanisms
4.1. Molecular-Level Transport and Adsorption Mechanisms
4.2. Multicomponent Gas Separation and Structural Design Strategies
5. Active-Site and Electronic Structure Engineering
5.1. Lewis Acid-Base Site Engineering and Catalytic Kinetics
5.2. Electronic Property Modulation and Electrocatalytic Selectivity
5.3. Synergistic Site Engineering and Composite Pore Modulation
6. Multi-Objective Inverse Design and Generative MOF Discovery
6.1. Multi-Objective Inverse Design and Chemical Subspace Exploration
7. Process-Level Integration and Industrial Translation
7.1. Process-Integrated Generative Design and Pore-Size Bifurcation
Conclusion:
| Study Focus | Primary ML Algorithm(s) | Key Descriptor(s) | Predictive Performance (R2) | Core Scientific Insight |
| Pore Energy Mapping | XGBoost | Energy-based RDFs & Surface Histograms | > 0.81 CO2 > 0.97 N2 | Spatially aware energy RDFs resolve the “intermediate pressure bottleneck” in isotherms. |
| Statistical Void Analysis | ERT / RF / XGBoost | Void Fraction Moments ( VFn) |
Up to 0.984 | The distribution of voids (VF2) is as critical as the total void fraction for uptake capacity. |
| Composite Modulation | CNN (Inception) | Geometric + Chemical (Ionic Liquids) | ≈ 0.90 | Ionic liquids can act as synergistic sites, creating new potential energy minima for CO2. |
| Kinetic Transport | DeepPot-SE (MLP) | Atomic coordinates (Flexible) | 0.9916 (Energy) | Framework flexibility accelerates CO2 diffusivity by 10x compared to rigid models. |
| Generative Design | MOFGPT (Transformer) | MOFid (NLP-based strings) | 35–100% Validity | Reinforcement learning effectively navigates the “extreme tail” of property distributions. |
| Process-Level Design | MOF-NET (ANN) | Word Embeddings of Building Blocks | Elite purity/recovery | Optimal design bifurcates into small-pore exclusion vs. large-pore binding. |
| Mixed Matrix Membranes | Stacking Ensemble | Polymer FFV + MOF PLD/LCD | 0.96 | A “10x permeability rule” exists where filler must exceed polymer permeability for gain. |
| Experimental Benchmarking | Stacking (RF/XGB/MLP) | Textural (BET) + Operational (P, T) | 0.9833 | Identified a metal-affinity hierarchy where Mg and Cu centers provide superior binding sites. |
| Hybrid Optimization | LSSVM-GO | Textural + Operational | 0.9798 | Growth Optimization (GO) significantly reduces prediction errors in high-uptake regimes. |
| Multicomponent Separation | Random Forest | Structural + Chemical Descriptors | 0.922 (R%) | MOF renderability is optimized within a specific density window of 0.5–1.7 g/cm3. |
| Electrocatalytic Selectivity | Gradient Boosting (GBR) | Electronic (EA, chi, d-band) | 0.9998 | Catalytic activity is primarily governed by electron affinity and electronegativity. |
| Universal Zeolite Prediction | GBT / RF / DL | Si/Al Ratio + Cation type | 0.936 | Provides a universal framework without case-specific parameter fitting required by Langmuir models. |
References
- Ozkan M., Akhavi A.-A., Coley W.C., Shang R., Ma Y., Progress in carbon dioxide capture materials for deep decarbonization, Chem 8 (1) (2022) 141–173. [CrossRef]
- Carrascal-Hernández, D.C.; Grande-Tovar, C.D.; Mendez-Lopez, M.; Insuasty, D.; García-Freites, S.; Sanjuan, M.; Márquez, E. CO2 Capture: A Comprehensive Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Scalable Materials and Sustainable Solutions. Molecules 2025, 30, 563. [CrossRef]
- Mahajan S., Lahtinen M., Recent progress in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for CO2 capture at different pressures, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 10 (6) (2022) 108930. [CrossRef]
- Multi-Scale Computational Design of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Carbon Capture Using Machine Learning and Multi-Objective Optimization.
- Zijun Deng and Lev SarkisovChemistry of Materials 2024 36 (19), 9806-9821DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01969.
- Hussin F., Md Rahim S.A.N., Mohamed Hatta N.S., Aroua M.K., Mazari S.A., A systematic review of machine learning approaches in carbon capture applications, J. CO2 Util. 71 (2023) 102474. [CrossRef]
- Coudert F.-X., Recent advances in stimuli-responsive framework materials: Understanding their response and searching for materials with targeted behavior, Coord. Chem. Rev. 539 (2025) 216760. [CrossRef]
- Park H., Majumdar S., Zhang X., Kim J., Smit B., Inverse design of metal–organic frameworks for direct air capture of CO2 via deep reinforcement learning, Digit. Discov. 3 (4) (2024) 728–741. [CrossRef]
- Fathalian, Farnoush & Aarabi, Sepehr & Ghaemi, Ahad & Hemmati, Alireza. (2022). Intelligent prediction models based on machine learning for CO2 capture performance by graphene oxide-based adsorbents. Scientific Reports. 12. 21507. 10.1038/s41598-022-26138-6.
- Z. Deng, L. Sarkisov, Engineering machine learning features to predict adsorption of carbon dioxide and nitrogen in metal–organic frameworks, J. Phys. Chem. C (2024). [CrossRef]
- J. Zuo, F. Sun, Z. Qu, C. Yang, L. Xie, Y. Zhang, X. Li, J. Li, Unraveling the coupling effect of micropore confinement and functional sites of carbon-based adsorbents on flue gas CO2 adsorption: A machine learning study based on multi-scale simulations, Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. (2025). [CrossRef]
- Y. Teng, G. Shan, Interpretable machine learning for materials discovery: Predicting CO2 adsorption properties of metal–organic frameworks, APL Mater. 12 (2024) 081115. [CrossRef]
- P.O. Longe, S. Davoodi, M. Mehrad, D.A. Wood, Robust machine-learning model for prediction of carbon dioxide adsorption on metal–organic frameworks, J. Alloys Compd. (2024). [CrossRef]
- Z. Iyiola, E.T. Brantson, N.J. Okeke, K. Sanni, P. Longe, Carbon capture using metal organic frameworks (MOFs): Novel custom ensemble learning models for prediction of CO2 adsorption, Processes 13 (2025). [CrossRef]
- H. Wan, Y. Fang, M. Hu, S. Guo, Z. Sui, X. Huang, Z. Liu, Y. Zhao, H. Liang, Y. Wu, H. Gao, Z. Qiao, Interpretable machine-learning and big data mining to predict the CO2 separation in polymer–MOF mixed matrix membranes, Adv. Sci. (2024). [CrossRef]
- S. Achour, Z. Hosni, ML-driven models for predicting CO2 uptake in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), Can. J. Chem. Eng. (2024). [CrossRef]
- E. Kirtil, Universal prediction of CO2 adsorption on zeolites using machine learning: A comparative analysis with Langmuir isotherm models, ChemEngineering 9 (2025) 80. [CrossRef]
- E.V. Kotov, J. Sravanthi, G. Logabiraman, H. Dhall, M. Chandna, P. Madan, V. Sharma, Carbon capture and storage optimization with machine learning using an ANN model, E3S Web Conf. 588 (2024) 01003. [CrossRef]
- B. Zheng, G.X. Gu, C. dos Santos, R.N.B. Ferreira, M. Steiner, B. Luan, Simulating CO2 diffusivity in rigid and flexible Mg-MOF-74 with machine-learning force fields, APL Mach. Learn. 2 (2024) 026115. [CrossRef]
- Y. Lim, H. Park, A. Walsh, J. Kim, Accelerating CO2 direct air capture screening for metal–organic frameworks with a transferable machine learning force field, ChemRxiv (2024). [CrossRef]
- J. Randrianandraina, C.S. Hong, J.-H. Lee, Unraveling the effects of pore size and diamine functionalization on CO2 diffusion in metal–organic frameworks using machine-learning interatomic potentials, ChemRxiv (2025). [CrossRef]
- Tayfuroglu, S. Keskin, Modeling CO2 adsorption in flexible MOFs with open metal sites via fragment-based neural network potentials, ChemRxiv (2025). [CrossRef]
- Y. Zhou, S. Ji, S. He, W. Fan, L. Zan, L. Zhou, X. Ji, G. He, Machine-learning-assisted high-throughput screening of metal–organic frameworks for CO2 separation from CO2-rich natural gas, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. (2024). [CrossRef]
- X. Bai, Y. Li, Y. Xie, Q. Chen, X. Zhang, J.-R. Li, High-throughput screening of CO2 cycloaddition MOF catalyst with an explainable machine learning model, Green Energy Environ. (2024). [CrossRef]
- G. Xing, S. Liu, G. Sun, J.-Y. Liu, Modification of metals and ligands in two-dimensional conjugated metal–organic frameworks for CO2 electroreduction: A combined DFT and machine learning study, SSRN Electron. J. (2024). [CrossRef]
- M. Sheng, X. Zhang, H. Cheng, Z. Song, Z. Qi, Multi-criteria computational screening of [BMIM][DCA]@MOF composites for CO2 capture, Green Chem. Eng. (2024). [CrossRef]
- H. Park, B. Smit, S. Majumdar, X. Zhang, J. Kim, Inverse design of metal–organic frameworks for direct air capture of CO2 via deep reinforcement learning, Digit. Discov. (2024). [CrossRef]
- S. Badrinarayanan, R. Magar, A. Antony, R.S. Meda, A.B. Farimani, MOFGPT: Generative design of metal–organic frameworks using language models, J. Chem. Inf. Model. (2025). [CrossRef]
- Z. Deng, L. Sarkisov, Multi-scale computational design of metal–organic frameworks for carbon capture using machine learning and multi-objective optimization, Chem. Mater. (2024). [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
