Submitted:
18 February 2026
Posted:
18 February 2026
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. The Core Dilemma of Modern Gravity and Cosmology
1.2. Physical Motivation of Spatial Quantization
1.3. Structure of This Paper
2. Limitations of Existing Theories
2.1. Applicable Boundaries of General Relativity
2.2. Internal Contradictions of the Dark Matter Hypothesis
3. Spatial Quantum Gravity Theory: An Axiomatic System
3.1. Core Axioms
3. Interaction Substance Induction Axiom
3.2. Physical Origin of the Increase in Spatial Quantum Numbers
3.3. Criteria for Effective Gravity Sources
3.4. Local Causality of Spatial Quantum and the Light Cone Interpretation of Cosmic Expansion
4. Covariant Space Quantum Field Theory
4.1. Definition of Spatial Quantum Field
4.2. Theoretical Action and Lagrangian
4.3. Covariant Dynamics Equation of Spatial Quantum Field
4.4. Unification with General Relativity
5. Microscopic Physical Nature of Gravity
5.2. Microscopic Origin of Gravitational Waves: Reorganization, Accumulation and Release of Spatial Quantum Gradient
6. Natural Elimination of Singularities
6.1. Black Hole with Singularity-Free Structure
6.2. Compatibility of Time Flow Velocity Distribution in Black Holes with General Relativity
6.3. Elimination of the Big Bang Singularity
7. Unified Explanation of Cosmic Expansion and Dark Energy
8. Unified Explanation of Galactic Dynamics and Dark Matter Effects
8.1. Static Spherical Symmetric Solution
8.2. Super-Diffuse Galaxies
8.3. Bullet Galaxies and the Universal Lensing Phenomenon of Galaxies
9. Theoretical Predictions Available for Testing
- Pure radiation systems may not produce significant additional gravitational effects, which can be tested in laboratories or pulsar systems.
- Dark matter particles may not exist, and underground detection and collider experiments may struggle to detect their signals.
- For the whole connected material system, the extreme value of the gravity gradient tends to appear at the outer edge of the system.
- The singularity may not exist in the early universe and the black hole is a high density space-quantum region with zero gradient and finite density.
- The expansion of the universe is more likely driven by the laws of conservation and quantum proliferation of space, rather than by the cosmological constant.
- The time flow velocity in the black hole satisfies that the central region is slower than the gradient extreme region, and the gradient extreme region is slower than the cosmic extreme region, which is consistent with the macroscopic conclusion of general relativity.
- Gravitational waves originate from the dynamic reorganization and energy release of spatial quantum number density gradients. Compact celestial bodies with different internal structures may exhibit subtle observable differences in their gravitational waveforms.
- The equivalent gravitational distribution of the galaxy cluster is determined by the superposition of multi-scale gradients. Strong gravitational lensing signals can be observed in the central dense region, while the separation of gravitational and baryonic matter can be seen in the collision system.
10. Conclusions
References
- Zhao, Z.; Yu, Gui; Liu, L. General Relativity and Black Hole Physics [M]; Higher Education Press: Beijing, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Yunqiang, Yu. General Relativity and Cosmology [M]; Peking University Press: Beijing, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Canbin, Liang; Bin, Zhou. Introduction to Differential Geometry and General Relativity [M]; Science Press: Beijing, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Rovelli, C. Quantum Gravity[M]; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Ashtekar, A; Singh, P. Loop Quantum Cosmology: A Status Report[J]. Classical and Quantum Gravity 2011, 28(21), 213001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinberg, S. The Cosmological Constant Problem[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics 1989, 61(1), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peebles, P J E; Ratra, B. The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics 2003, 75(2), 559–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clifton, T; Ferreira, P G; Padilla, A; et al. Modified Gravity and Cosmology[J]. Physics Reports 2012, 513(1-3), 1–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbott, B P; Abbott, R; Abbott, T D; et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger[J]. Physical Review Letters 2016, 116(6), 061102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bertone, G; Hooper, D; Silk, J. Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints[J]. Physics Reports 2005, 405(5-6), 279–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milgrom, M. A Modification of the Newtonian Dynamics as a Possible Alternative to the Hidden Mass Hypothesis[J]. Astrophysical Journal 1983, 270(2), 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeldovich, Y B. The Cosmological Constant and the Theory of Elementary Particles[J]. Soviet Physics Uspekhi 1968, 11(3), 381–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Susskind, L. The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant[J]. Journal of Statistical Physics 2005, 118(5-6), 607–624. [Google Scholar]
- Hawking, S W. Particle Creation by Black Holes[J]. Communications in Mathematical Physics 1975, 43(3), 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penrose, R. Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Singularities[J]. Physical Review Letters 1965, 14(3), 57–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).