Submitted:
28 January 2026
Posted:
30 January 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- Late detection: Behavioral manifestations (eye closure, yawning) occur only after significant impairment has developed, typically 1–3 minutes before crash risk peaks [10].
- Environmental sensitivity: Camera performance degrades with sunglasses, variable lighting, facial occlusion, and non-frontal head positions.
- Privacy concerns: Continuous facial monitoring raises user acceptance issues, particularly in personal vehicles and commercial fleets [11].
- Reactive paradigm: Current systems detect impairment rather than predicting onset, limiting intervention options to post-hoc warnings.
- Validation of HRV derivatives as standalone drowsiness indicators: Ablation analysis demonstrates that derivatives alone achieve 78.1% accuracy—96% of camera-based performance—without any visual features, enabling camera-free monitoring.
- Quantified early warning capability: HRV derivatives detect drowsiness onset 5–8 minutes before behavioral indicators and 6.8 minutes before crash events, providing actionable lead time for graduated interventions.
- Non-contact sensing architecture: Capacitive ECG electrodes embedded in seat backrests enable continuous monitoring without driver instrumentation, addressing privacy concerns and enabling seamless vehicle integration.
- Rigorous validation methodology: Ground truth labeling explicitly excludes HRV derivatives, preventing circular reasoning that inflates reported accuracies in prior work.
- Crash-anchored analysis: Examination of 2056 crash events reveals that driving impairment manifests during the transition toward drowsiness (56.2% in Alert, 43.8% in early Light), validating that HRV derivatives detect physiological precursors before traditional drowsiness thresholds are reached.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Setup
2.1.1. Driving Simulator Environment
2.1.2. Non-Contact ECG Acquisition System
2.1.3. Multi-Modal Data Acquisition
2.2. Participants and Protocol
2.3. Signal Processing Pipeline
2.3.1. ECG Preprocessing
2.3.2. HRV Derivative Computation
2.4. Ground Truth Labeling
2.5. Classification Architecture
3. Results
3.1. Dataset Characteristics
3.2. Classification Performance
- Overall Accuracy: 87.5% (95% CI: 85.0–90.0%)
- Macro F1-Score: 0.85 (± 0.01)
- Weighted F1-Score: 0.87 (± 0.02)
3.3. Ablation Study: HRV Derivatives as Standalone Indicators
3.4. Temporal Analysis: Early Warning Capability
3.5. Cross-Validation and Generalization
4. Discussion
4.1. Physiological Interpretation of HRV Derivatives
4.2. Comparison with Existing Systems
4.3. Crash Event Analysis
4.4. Vehicle Integration Strategies
- Electrode placement: Mid-thoracic backrest position (25 cm from seat base)
- Material: Woven metallic nylon textile, compatible with standard upholstery
- Processing: Edge inference on automotive-grade ECU (1.5 ms latency, 3.2 W power)
- Alert strategy: Graduated response—subtle notifications at initial detection, escalating to assertive warnings if drowsiness persists
4.5. Limitations and Future Directions
5. Conclusions
- HRV derivatives as standalone indicators: 78.1% accuracy without any visual features—96% of camera-based performance.
- Substantial early warning capability: Detection precedes behavioral manifestations by 5–8 minutes and crash events by 6.8 minutes.
- Crash-anchored validation: 100% of crashes occurred in the Alert-Light transition zone.
- Non-contact sensing architecture: Capacitive ECG electrodes enable continuous monitoring without driver instrumentation.
- Embedded deployment feasibility: 12.5 MB model size, 1.5 ms inference latency, 3.2 W power consumption.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Drowsy Driving. Traffic Safety Facts 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Vanlaar, W.; Simpson, H.; Mayhew, D.; Robertson, R. Fatigued and drowsy driving: A survey of attitudes, opinions and behaviors. J. Saf. Res. 2008, 39, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Connor, J.; Norton, R.; Ameratunga, S.; Robinson, E.; Civil, I.; Dunn, R.; Bailey, J.; Jackson, R. Driver sleepiness and risk of serious injury to car occupants: Population based case control study. BMJ 2002, 324, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Philip, P.; Sagaspe, P.; Moore, N.; Taillard, J.; Charles, A.; Guilleminault, C.; Bioulac, B. Fatigue, sleep restriction and driving performance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2005, 37, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tefft, B.C. Prevalence of motor vehicle crashes involving drowsy drivers, United States. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Hossain, J.L.; Ahmad, P.; Reinish, L.W.; Kayumov, L.; Hossain, N.K.; Shapiro, C.M. Subjective fatigue and subjective sleepiness: Two independent consequences of sleep disorders? J. Sleep Res. 2005, 14, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Solaz, J.; Laparra-Hernández, J.; Bande, D.; Rodríguez, N.; Veleff, S.; Gerpe, J.; Medina, E. Drowsiness Detection Based on the Analysis of Breathing Rate Obtained from Real-time Image Recognition. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 3867–3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, A.; Shankaran, R.; Kavakli, M.; Haque, M.M. Sensor applications and physiological features in drivers’ drowsiness detection: A review. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 18, 3055–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahayadhas, A.; Sundaraj, K.; Murugappan, M. Detecting driver drowsiness based on sensors: A review. Sensors 2012, 12, 16937–16953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wierwille, W.W.; Ellsworth, L.; Wreggit, S.; Fairbanks, R.; Kirn, C. Evaluation of driver drowsiness by trained raters. Accid. Anal. Prev. 1994, 26, 571–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, L.; et al. Driver monitoring systems: A survey of privacy concerns and mitigation strategies. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Larue, G.S.; Rakotonirainy, A.; Pettitt, A.N. Driving performance impairments due to hypovigilance on monotonous roads. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2011, 43, 2037–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujiwara, K.; Abe, E.; Kamata, K.; et al. Heart rate variability-based driver drowsiness detection and its validation with EEG. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2019, 66, 1769–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vicente, J.; Laguna, P.; Bartra, A.; Bailón, R. Drowsiness detection using heart rate variability. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2016, 54, 927–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lal, S.K.; Craig, A. A critical review of the psychophysiology of driver fatigue. Biol. Psychol. 2003, 55, 173–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebrahimian, S.; Nahvi, A.; et al. A multi-level fusion framework for driver drowsiness detection. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 77217–77233. [Google Scholar]
- Hendra, M.; Kurniawan, D.; et al. Drowsiness detection using heart rate variability analysis. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1153, 012047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acharya, U.R.; Joseph, K.P.; Kannathal, N.; Lim, C.M.; Suri, J.S. Heart rate variability: A review. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2006, 44, 1031–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, M.Q.; Lee, S. Wearable sensor-based fatigue detection in drivers: A systematic review. Sensors 2023, 23, 6245. [Google Scholar]
- Du, G.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X. Real-time driver drowsiness detection using PPG signals with deep learning. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2024, 127, 107266. [Google Scholar]
- Vaussenat, F.; Bhattacharya, A.; Boudreau, P.; Boivin, D.B.; Gagnon, G.; Cloutier, S.G. Derivative method to detect sleep and awake states through heart rate variability analysis. Sensors 2024, 24, 4317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thiffault, P.; Bergeron, J. Monotony of road environment and driver fatigue: A simulator study. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2003, 35, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sirtoli, V.G.; Granata, S.; Gagnon, G.; Cowan, G.E.R. Input Resistance Boosting for Capacitive Biosignal Acquisition Electrodes. IEEE Sensors J. 2024, 24, 3004–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirtoli, V.G.; Liamini, M.; Lins, L.T.; Lessard-Tremblay, M.; Cowan, G.E.R.; Zednik, R.J.; Gagnon, G. Removal of Motion Artifacts in Capacitive Electrocardiogram Acquisition: A Review. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2023, 17, 394–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renaud-Dumoulin, G.-G. Detection of Driver Drowsiness Using ECG Obtained from Non-Intrusive Capacitive Textile Sensors. M.Sc.A. Thesis, École de technologie supérieure, Montréal, QC, Canada, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Hughes-Riley, T.; Hill-Casey, F.; Oliveira, C.; Shahidi, A.; Hurley, W.; Dias, T. The effects of electrode geometry on the performance of textile ECG electrodes. Sensors 2019, 19, 4152. [Google Scholar]
- Sundling, C.; Dahlin, E. The impact of data synchronization on multi-modal drowsiness detection. Sensors 2022, 22, 1163. [Google Scholar]
- Makowski, D.; Pham, T.; et al. NeuroKit2: A Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing. Behav. Res. Methods 2021, 53, 1689–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Y.; Hu, Z.; Uchimura, K.; Murayama, N. Driver inattention monitoring system for intelligent vehicles: A review. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2011, 12, 596–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kundinger, T.; Riener, A.; Sofra, N.; Weigl, K. Feasibility of smart steering wheel for detecting drowsiness. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2020, 148, 105805. [Google Scholar]
- Borghini, G.; Astolfi, L.; Vecchiato, G.; Mattia, D.; Babiloni, F. Measuring neurophysiological signals for mental workload assessment. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2014, 44, 58–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| Configuration | Acc. | Prec. | Rec. | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Model | 0.875 | 0.850 | 0.860 | 0.852 |
| Without HRV Derivatives | 0.721 | 0.698 | 0.712 | 0.704 |
| HRV Derivatives ONLY | 0.781 | 0.762 | 0.774 | 0.768 |
| Visual Features Only | 0.812 | 0.791 | 0.803 | 0.797 |
| HRV Base Features Only | 0.654 | 0.631 | 0.645 | 0.638 |
| 1st Derivative Only | 0.742 | 0.721 | 0.733 | 0.727 |
| 2nd Derivative Only | 0.709 | 0.688 | 0.702 | 0.695 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).