Submitted:
29 March 2026
Posted:
30 March 2026
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Conceptual Foundations
1.1. Axiomatic Basis: Minimal Architecture
Principle A: Operational Regions
Principle B: Finite-Resolution Modular Information
Principle C: Topological Quantization and Minimal Transport
1.2. Boundary Architecture, Resolution and Connectivity
1.3. Topological Budget: Effective Internal Degeneracy
Bulk Topology ()
Tip Defect Parameter ()
Twist Contribution ()
Resulting Effective Internal Degeneracy (N)
Structural Rigidity and Consistency
1.4. Constitutive Relation and Calibration
Numerical Calibration
Pixel Saturation Limit
1.5. Emergent Time
2. Relative-Entropy Functional and Dynamics
2.1. Entropic Variational Principle and Operational Domain
Variational Domain
2.2. Hessian Bridge, Spectral Extraction and EFT Coefficients
2.3. Coupling Factorization and Spectral–Volume Correspondence
2.4. Tensor Sector: Gravity as Extensive Stiffness
2.5. Vector Sector: Gauge as Intrinsic Susceptibility
2.6. Scalar Sector: Mass as Occupancy Stiffness
2.7. Unified Matching-Scale Action at
2.8. Relation to Continuum Approaches
2.9. Time Evolution as Open Modular Dynamics and Canonical Lie Filtration
2.10. Recovery of Standard Limits and Entropic Arrow of Time
Einstein Limit
Yang–Mills and Dirac Limits
Entropic Arrow of Time
3. Numerical Predictions Across Scales
3.1. Predictions vs. Observations
| Quantity | Prediction | Observation / Reference | Deviation | Class | Derivation Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cosmology: Capacity Saturation and Entropic Response ([app:appA]Appendix A) | |||||
| Coherence | [58] | [I,P] | [P4, P5, P7] | ||
| Scalar amplitude | [58] | [O,P] | [P4, P5, P7] | ||
| Spectral tilt | [58] | [O,P] | ; [P4, P5, P7] | ||
| Tensor ratio r | [59] | Consistent | [B,P] | ; [P4, P5, P7] | |
| Running | [58] | Consistent | [O,P] | ; [P4, P5, P7] | |
| Scalaron mass | GeV | GeV [58] | [I,D] | [P5] | |
| Stiffness | [58] | [I,D] | [P5, P7] | ||
| Vacuum | [60] | [O,P] | [P3, P5, P7] | ||
| Struct. growth | 0.816 | [58,61] | Consistent | [O,E] | [P4, P5, P7] |
| Accel. floor | [62] | [H,E] | [P4] | ||
| Electroweak Saturation and Mass Generation ([app:appB]Appendix B) | |||||
| Higgs mass | GeV | [60] | [O,P] | [P3, P5–P7] | |
| VEV v | GeV | [60] | [I,P] | [P4, P5, P7] | |
| Top mass | GeV | [60] | [O,P] | [P3, P5–P7] | |
| Top Yukawa | [60] | [I,D] | ; [P3–P7] | ||
| Higgs quartic | [60] | [I,D] | ; [P3–P7] | ||
| Gauge Couplings as Entropic Stiffness ([app:appC]Appendix C) | |||||
| Fine-structure | [63] | [O,P] | [P2, P4, P5, P7] | ||
| UV EM | [64] | [I,P] | [P5–P7] | ||
| UV Strong | [64] | [S,P] | [P5–P7] | ||
| Coupling Ratio | [64] | [S,D] | [P6, P7] | ||
| Weak mix | [60] | Consistent | [S,P] | [P6, P7] | |
| Lepton Mass Spectrum via Spectral Filtration ([app:appD]Appendix D) | |||||
| Proton mass | 942 MeV | 938 MeV [60] | [O,P] | [P5, P6] | |
| Ratio | [60] | [O,P] | [P5, P7] | ||
| Electron mass | MeV | MeV [60] | [O,D] | ; [P5, P7] | |
| Muon mass | MeV | MeV [60] | [O,P] | ; [P5, P7] | |
| Tau mass | GeV | GeV [60] | [O,P] | [P5–P7] | |
3.2. Derivation Summary and Insights
Cosmology: Capacity Saturation and Entropic Response ([app:appA]Appendix A)
Electroweak Saturation and Mass Generation ([app:appB]Appendix B)
Gauge Couplings as Entropic Stiffness ([app:appC]Appendix C)
Lepton Mass Spectrum via Spectral Filtration ([app:appD]Appendix D)
4. Conclusions and Outlook
4.1. Discretizing Gravity and Hierarchy of Scales
4.2. The Dynamical Engine
4.3. Coherency Units and Geometric Naturalness
4.4. Predictive Rigidity Across Sectors
4.5. Outlook
Appendix A. Cosmology: Capacity Saturation and Entropic Response
Appendix A.1. Geometric Stiffness and Activation (UV Saturation)
Appendix A.2. Coherence Duration (N * )
Appendix A.3. Primordial Observables (A s ,n s ,r,α s )
Appendix A.4. Cosmological Constant as Entropic Horizon Leakage
Appendix A.5. IR Regime: Horizon Coherence and S 8 (Exploratory)
Appendix A.6. Galactic Regime: Acceleration Floor (a 0 ) (Exploratory)
Appendix A.7. Summary of Predictions
Appendix B. Electroweak Saturation and Mass Generation
Appendix B.1. Per-Pixel Energy Budget (E pix )
Appendix B.2. Higgs Boson: Structural Entropic Cost
Appendix B.3. Vacuum Expectation Value: Noise Floor
Appendix B.4. Top Quark: Phase Saturation Bound
Appendix B.5. Structural Locks and Vacuum Stability
Appendix B.6. Summary of Predictions
Appendix C. Gauge Couplings as Entropic Stiffness
Appendix C.1. Entropic Stiffness Quantization
Appendix C.2. Strong Sector Prediction (k=3)
Appendix C.3. Electromagnetic Prediction (k=9) and Consistency Check
Appendix Internal Consistency Check (Integer Lock)
Appendix C.4. Infrared Static Response: Fine-Structure Constant
Appendix Prediction of the Fine-Structure Constant under Spectral Selection
Appendix Observation and Falsifiability
Appendix C.5. Summary of Predictions
Appendix D. Lepton Mass Spectrum via Spectral Filtration
Appendix D.1. Dressed Hadronic Anchor m p
Appendix D.2. Mass as Spectral Susceptibility
Appendix D.3. Lepton Cascade
Appendix Generation 1: Electron (stable global G regime; resolves full global symmetry G)
Appendix Generation 2: Muon (transient tangent g regime; resolves local algebra g)
Appendix Generation 3: Tau (prompt commuting T regime / Cartan torus; fixed-point algebra)
Appendix D.4. Summary of Predictions
References
- DeWitt, B.S. Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory. Phys. Rev. 1967, 160, 1113–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bousso, R. The Holographic Principle. In Rev. Mod. Phys.; hep-th/0203101, 2002; Volume 74, pp. 825–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, D.N.; Wootters, W.K. Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables. Phys. Rev. D 1983, 27, 2885–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bisognano, J.J.; Wichmann, E.H. On the duality condition for a Hermitian scalar field. J. Math. Phys. 1975, 16, 985–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unruh, W.G. Notes on black hole evaporation. Phys. Rev. D 1976, 14, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobson, T. Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 1260–1263, [gr-qc/9504004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Raamsdonk, M. Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2010, 42, 2323–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padmanabhan, T. Dark Energy and Gravity. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. Class. Quant. Grav. 2008, 40 25, 529–564 205021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verlinde, E.P. Emergent Gravity and the Dark Universe. SciPost Phys. 2017, arXiv:hep2, 016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donnelly, W.; Freidel, L. Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity. JHEP 2016, arXiv:hep09, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giddings, S.B. Hilbert space structure in quantum gravity: an algebraic perspective. JHEP 2015, arXiv:hep12, 099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freidel, L.; Geiller, M.; Pranzetti, D. Edge modes of gravity. Part I. Corner potentials and charges. JHEP 2020, arXiv:hep11, 026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Susskind, L. The World as a Hologram. J. Math. Phys. 1995, 36, 6377–6396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
- Kubo, R. Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes. I. General Theory and Simple Applications to Magnetic and Conduction Problems. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1957, 12, 570–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haag, R. Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Bekenstein, J.D. Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems. Phys. Rev. D 1981, 23, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solodukhin, S.N. Entanglement Entropy of Black Holes. Living Rev. Relativ. 2011, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witten, E. Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial. Communications in Mathematical Physics 1989, 121, 351–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Ariano, G.M.; Perinotti, P. Derivation of the Dirac equation from principles of information processing. Phys. Rev. A 2014, 90, 062106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elitzur, S.; Moore, G.W.; Schwimmer, A.; Seiberg, N. Remarks on the Canonical Quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten Theory. Nucl. Phys. B 1989, 326, 108–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Susskind, L.; Thorlacius, L.; Uglum, J. The stretched horizon and black hole complementarity. Physical Review D 1993, 48, 3743–3761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bialynicki-Birula, I. On the Wave Function of the Photon. Acta Phys. Pol. A 1994, 86, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ’t Hooft, G. Deterministic Quantum Mechanics: The Mathematical Equations. Nucl. Phys. B 2019, 946, 114703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regge, T. General relativity without coordinates. Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 1961, 19, 558–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekenstein, J.D. Black holes and entropy. Phys. Rev. D 1973, 7, 2333–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ’t Hooft, G. Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity. Conf. Proc. C 1993, 930308, 284–296. [Google Scholar]
- do Carmo, M.P. Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces; Prentice-Hall, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Donoghue, J.F. General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections. Phys. Rev. D 1994, 50, 3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sakharov, A.D. Vacuum quantum fluctuations in curved space and the theory of gravitation. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR Gen. Rel. Grav. 32, 365. 1967, 177, 70–71. [Google Scholar]
- Dvali, G. Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem. Fortsch. Phys. 2010, 58, 528–536, [0706.2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chamseddine, A.H.; Connes, A. Universal Formula for Noncommutative Geometry Actions: Unification of Gravity and the Standard Model. Phys. Rev. Lett. Reviewer Ref E: Also published in Commun. Math. Phys. 182, 155 (1996). 1996, 77, 4868–4871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minkowski, P. μ→eγ at a rate of one out of 109 muon decays. Phys. Lett. B 1977, 67, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starobinsky, A.A. A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity. Phys. Lett. B 1980, 91, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawking, S.W. Particle creation by black holes. Commun. Math. Phys. 1975, 43, 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casini, H. Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound. Class. Quant. Grav. 2008, 25, 205021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bianconi, G. Gravity from entropy. Phys. Rev. D 2025, arXiv:gr111, 066001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vassilevich, D.V. Heat kernel expansion: user’s manual Standard reference for the coefficients of the spectral expansion. Phys. Rep. 2003, 388, 279–360. [Google Scholar]
- Verlinde, E. On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton. JHEP 2011, arXiv:hep04, 029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bianconi, G. Quantum entropy couples matter with geometry. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 2024, 57, 365002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdem, R. A review of some recent developments in the thermodynamics of gravity. Turk. J. Phys. 2022, 46, 51–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saridakis, E.N. Bouncing cosmology in entropic gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 2024, 84, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheykhi, A. Modified entropic gravity. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2022, 37, 2250186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaynes, E.T. Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics. Physical Review 1957, 106, 620–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araki, H. Relative Hamiltonian for states of von Neumann algebras. Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences 1976, 11, 809–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohya, M.; Petz, D. Quantum Entropy and Its Use, 2nd ed.; Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Takesaki, M. Theory of Operator Algebras I, II, III. In Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003; Vol. 124. [Google Scholar]
- Connes, A. Noncommutative Geometry; Academic Press: San Diego, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Chamseddine, A.H.; Connes, A. The Spectral Action Principle Foundational derivation of the Standard Model action from spectral geometry. Commun. Math. Phys. 1997, 186, 731–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faulkner, T.; Guica, M.; Hartman, T.; Myers, R.C.; Van Raamsdonk, M. Gravitation from Entanglement in Holographic CFTs. JHEP 2014, 03(051), 1312.7856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Francesco, P.; Mathieu, P.; Sénéchal, D. Conformal Field Theory. In Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics; Springer: New York, 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witten, E. Non-abelian bosonization in two dimensions. Commun. Math. Phys. 1984, 92, 455–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilkey, P.B. Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem, 2nd ed.; CRC Press, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Gorini, V.; Kossakowski, A.; Sudarshan, E.C.G. Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems. Journal of Mathematical Physics 1976, 17, 821–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindblad, G. On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups. Communications in Mathematical Physics 1976, 48, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, D.N. Particle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, nonrotating hole. Phys. Rev. D 1976, 13, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zurek, W.H. Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2003, 75, 715–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petz, D. Sufficient subalgebras and the relative entropy of states of a von Neumann algebra. Communications in Mathematical Physics 1986, 105, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aghanim, N.; et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ade, P.A.R.; et al. Improved constraints on primordial gravitational waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck observations through the 2018 observing season. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 127, 151301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navas, S.; et al. Review of Particle Physics. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 110, 030001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbott, T.M.C.; et al. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 023520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lelli, F.; McGaugh, S.S.; Schombert, J.M.; Pawlowski, M.S. One Law to Rule Them All: The Radial Acceleration Relation of Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal 2017, arXiv:astro836, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morel, L.; Yao, Z.; Cladé, P.; Guellati-Khélifa, S. Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion. Nature 2020, 588, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buttazzo, D.; Degrassi, G.; Giardino, P.P.; Giudice, G.F.; Sala, F.; Salvio, A.; Strumia, A. Deconstructing the vacuum stability analysis. JHEP 2013, arXiv:hep12, 089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ade, P.A.R.; Ahmed, Z.; Amiri, M.; Barkats, D.; et al.; BICEP/Keck Collaboration Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, arXiv:astro127, 151301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, A.G.; Kaplan, D.B.; Nelson, A.E. Effective field theory, gravity, and the cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 4971–4974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M. A Model of holographic dark energy. Phys. Lett. B 2004, 603, 1–5, [hep-th/0403127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breuer, H.P.; Petruccione, F. The Theory of Open Quantum Systems; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Gibbons, G.W.; Hawking, S.W. Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation. Phys. Rev. D 1977, 15, 2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padmanabhan, T. Thermodynamical aspects of gravity: new insights. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2010, 73, 046901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Famaey, B.; McGaugh, S.S. Modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND): observational phenomenology and relativistic extensions. Living Rev. Relativ. 2012, 15, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoang, A.H. The Top Mass: Interpretation and Theoretical Uncertainties. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2020, arXiv:hep70, 225–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Degrassi, G.; et al. Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the Standard Model at NNLO. JHEP 2012, 08, 098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, K.G. Confinement of quarks. Phys. Rev. D 1974, 10, 2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Georgi, H.; Glashow, S.L. Unity of All Elementary-Particle Forces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1974, 32, 438–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bordag, M.; Elizalde, E.; Kirsten, K. Heat kernel coefficients of the Laplace operator on the D-dimensional ball. J. Math. Phys. 1996, 37, 3713–3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fursaev, D.V.; Patrushev, A.; Solodukhin, S.N. Distributional Geometry of Squashed Cones. Phys. Rev. D 2013, arXiv:hep88, 044054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, R.H.; Yu, C.; Estey, B.; Müller, H. Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model. Science 2018, 360, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chodos, A.; Jaffe, R.L.; Johnson, K.; Thorn, C.B.; Weisskopf, V.F. New extended model of hadrons. Phys. Rev. D 1974, 9, 3471–3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weyl, H. Über die asymptotische Verteilung der Eigenwerte. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 1911, 1911, 110–117. [Google Scholar]
- Georgi, H. Lie algebras in particle physics: from isospin to unified theories; Westview Press, 1999. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).