Submitted:
09 January 2026
Posted:
13 January 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Background of the Study
1.2. Problem Statement
- Inelastic Infrastructure: Most legacy portals lack the horizontal scalability required to manage the surge of concurrent users during peak registration windows, leading to frequent system failures [4].
- Fragmented User Experience: Students are often forced to navigate multiple, disconnected platforms for room selection, lease execution, and financial transactions, which increases the likelihood of user error and abandonment.
- Manual Resource Allocation: The absence of intelligent automation in roommate matching and inventory management forces administrators to perform manual data entry, which is both time-consuming and prone to human error [1].
- Security and Compliance Gaps: Many older systems do not meet contemporary standards for data encryption and privacy, such as GDPR or SOC2, placing sensitive student information at risk [5].
1.3. Objectives of the Research
- To Engineer a Scalable Cloud Architecture: Develop a multi-tier system using containerized microservices to ensure fault tolerance and high performance [2].
- To Implement an Integrated Student Portal: Design a "mobile-first" interface that facilitates real-time room booking, digital contract management, and secure payment processing.
- To Develop an Administrative Command Center: Create a centralized dashboard for housing officers to monitor occupancy rates, manage maintenance workflows, and generate financial reports.
- To Conduct Empirical User Validation: Apply a standardized testing framework to evaluate the system’s usability and ensure it meets the criteria for student and staff acceptance [3].
1.4. Research Questions
- How can cloud-native load balancing and auto-scaling be utilized to mitigate system latency during high-traffic enrollment periods?
- What architectural patterns best support the security and integrity of financial and personal data in a multi-tenant housing environment [4]?
- How do usability factors and interface design influence the adoption rate of new housing technologies among international student cohorts [3]?
1.5. Significance of the Study
1.6. Scope and Delimitations
2. Literature Review
2.1. Theoretical Framework of Cloud Computing
2.2. Evolution of Student Housing Management Systems
2.3. User Acceptance and Usability Engineering
2.4. Security and Privacy in the Cloud
2.5. Software Performance and DevOps Integration
2.6. Summary of Literature
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Research Design and Framework
3.2. Requirements Engineering
- Functional Requirements: These include automated room allocation, digital lease management, real-time maintenance ticketing, and secure payment processing.
- Non-Functional Requirements: Prioritization was given to scalability, ensuring the system can handle concurrent users; security, protecting student PII; and usability, as emphasized in the research by S. Penmetsa [3].
3.3. System Architecture and Design
- Frontend Layer: Developed using the React.js framework to provide a responsive, "mobile-first" experience.
- Backend Layer: Built on a Node.js/Express environment, facilitating high-concurrency handling through non-blocking I/O operations.
- Database Layer: A hybrid approach is utilized, employing PostgreSQL for relational data (leases, financial records) and MongoDB for unstructured data (maintenance logs and user activity) [4].
- Cloud Infrastructure: The system is hosted on a major cloud provider (e.g., AWS), utilizing Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) and Auto-Scaling groups to maintain performance during peak traffic [12].
3.4. Data Flow and Logic
3.5. Development and Testing Environment
- Unit Testing: Individual components are tested to ensure logical correctness.
- Integration Testing: Verifies that the cloud services communicate effectively without data loss.
- User Acceptance Testing (UAT): Following the methodology prescribed by Penmetsa [3], a cohort of 50 students and 10 administrative staff members was selected to evaluate the system. The testing focused on "System Usability Scales" (SUS) to quantify user satisfaction and identify friction points in the housing application process.
3.6. Ethical Considerations
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. System Implementation Overview
4.2. Performance Metrics and Scalability Analysis
- Latency Management: Through the implementation of a Content Delivery Network (CDN) and edge caching, the average page load time was reduced to 1.2 seconds, a 65% improvement over the institution's previous legacy system.
- Database Throughput: The hybrid use of PostgreSQL and MongoDB allowed for high-speed retrieval of room availability data while maintaining ACID compliance for financial transactions [4].
- Auto-Scaling Efficiency: During a simulated "housing rush," the system's auto-scaling group successfully provisioned additional compute instances within 180 seconds of CPU utilization exceeding the 70% threshold, preventing any service downtime [12].
4.3. User Acceptance Testing (UAT) Results
4.3.1. Student Feedback
- Ease of Navigation: 92% of students successfully completed the room booking and lease execution process in under five minutes without external assistance.
- Perceived Trust: The integration of secure, transparent payment gateways led to a high degree of confidence in the platform's handling of financial data [3].
4.3.2. Administrative Efficiency
4.4. Discussion of Findings
4.5. Comparison with Existing Solutions
5. Conclusions and Recommendations
5.1. Conclusions
5.2. Contributions to Knowledge
- Architectural Blueprint: Provides a validated framework for deploying multi-tenant housing applications using modern cloud-native stacks.
- Methodological Validation: Reinforces the necessity of iterative usability testing in specialized ERP systems, specifically within the student housing sector [3].
- Operational Efficiency: Quantifies the reduction in administrative overhead achieved through automated roommate matching and digital lease management.
5.3. Recommendations for Implementation
- Hybrid Cloud Strategy: Institutions with existing legacy databases should consider a hybrid cloud approach to ensure data continuity during the migration phase [15].
- Continuous Feedback Loops: As student demographics and technical habits evolve, the system should undergo biennial usability audits to maintain high acceptance levels [3].
- Security Hardening: Regular penetration testing and adherence to Zero Trust principles are essential to protect the integrity of student PII and financial records in a shared cloud environment [5].
5.4. Future Work
- Predictive Maintenance: Utilizing machine learning algorithms to predict facility failures based on historical maintenance logs.
- Smart Dormitories: Integrating IoT sensors for automated energy management and smart access control, which can be managed directly through the cloud interface.
- Enhanced Matching Algorithms: Using deep learning to refine roommate matching based on more complex psychological and behavioral profiles.
References
- R. S. Pressman and B. R. Maxim, Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, 9th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Education, 2020.
- R. Buyya and J. Broberg, Cloud Computing: Principles and Paradigms. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2011.
- Penmetsa, S. V. (2024, October). Design and Implementation of a Student Accommodation Application Using Ionic Framework and AWS. In 2024 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing, Big Data Application and Software Engineering (CBASE) (pp. 915-929). IEEE.
- M. Fowler, Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Professional, 2002.
- B. Sosinsky, Cloud Computing Bible. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Wiley Publishing, Inc., 2011.
- G. J. Myers, C. Sandler, and T. Badgett, The Art of Software Testing, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
- P. Mell and T. Grance, "The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing," National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, Special Publication 800-145, 2011.
- D. J. Brailsford, "Experience and Outcomes of Student Housing: A Systematic Review," Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 612–628, 2019.
- J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 1993.
- S. S. J. Lin and S. Kim, "Security and Privacy in Academic Data Management: A Review," International Journal of Information Management, vol. 55, p. 102213, Dec. 2020.
- N. Forsgren, J. Humble, and G. Kim, Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps. Portland, OR, USA: IT Revolution Press, 2018.
- J. Garrison and N. Nova, Cloud Native Infrastructure: Patterns for Scalable Infrastructure and Applications in a Dynamic Environment. Sebastopol, CA, USA: O'Reilly Media, 2017.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
