Figure 2.
Gaussian modeling of energy spectra for the Ising case () on a lattice. (a) Individual contributions from exchange, Zeeman, and dipolar energies. (b) Broadening and reshaping of the total spectrum as the dipolar ratio increases. The parameter denotes the standard deviation (energy width) of the Gaussian fits to the corresponding histograms, providing a quantitative measure of the dispersion of energy levels. Its increase with reflects the enhanced energetic heterogeneity induced by long-range dipolar interactions in finite clusters.
Figure 2.
Gaussian modeling of energy spectra for the Ising case () on a lattice. (a) Individual contributions from exchange, Zeeman, and dipolar energies. (b) Broadening and reshaping of the total spectrum as the dipolar ratio increases. The parameter denotes the standard deviation (energy width) of the Gaussian fits to the corresponding histograms, providing a quantitative measure of the dispersion of energy levels. Its increase with reflects the enhanced energetic heterogeneity induced by long-range dipolar interactions in finite clusters.
Figure 3.
Gaussian modeling of energy spectra of the dipolar clock model. (a) Histograms for and : increasing Q enriches the number of accessible energy levels and smooths the spectrum. (b) Histograms for and : increasing lattice size adds distinct energy levels and modifies degeneracy patterns; free boundaries enhance edge effects.
Figure 3.
Gaussian modeling of energy spectra of the dipolar clock model. (a) Histograms for and : increasing Q enriches the number of accessible energy levels and smooths the spectrum. (b) Histograms for and : increasing lattice size adds distinct energy levels and modifies degeneracy patterns; free boundaries enhance edge effects.
Figure 4.
Thermodynamic behavior under isolated interaction terms on an lattice for . (a) Internal energy for pure exchange (, blue), Zeeman (, green), and dipolar (, red). (b) Specific heat for the same cases. Exchange interactions display the expected double-peak structure at large Q; Zeeman fields suppress the low-temperature peak; dipolar couplings broaden and shift the spectral response.
Figure 4.
Thermodynamic behavior under isolated interaction terms on an lattice for . (a) Internal energy for pure exchange (, blue), Zeeman (, green), and dipolar (, red). (b) Specific heat for the same cases. Exchange interactions display the expected double-peak structure at large Q; Zeeman fields suppress the low-temperature peak; dipolar couplings broaden and shift the spectral response.
Figure 5.
Entropy for an lattice under isolated interaction terms: exchange (, blue), Zeeman (, green), and dipolar (, red). Markers indicate clock symmetries .
Figure 5.
Entropy for an lattice under isolated interaction terms: exchange (, blue), Zeeman (, green), and dipolar (, red). Markers indicate clock symmetries .
Figure 6.
Finite-size effects under isolated interactions in lattices of size . (a) Internal energy per site for exchange (, blue), Zeeman (, green), and dipolar (, red). (b) Specific heat per site for the same cases. Exchange and dipolar interactions display sharper peaks whose positions shift toward higher temperatures as L increases, reflecting enhanced collective behavior and an approach to thermodynamic-limit trends.
Figure 6.
Finite-size effects under isolated interactions in lattices of size . (a) Internal energy per site for exchange (, blue), Zeeman (, green), and dipolar (, red). (b) Specific heat per site for the same cases. Exchange and dipolar interactions display sharper peaks whose positions shift toward higher temperatures as L increases, reflecting enhanced collective behavior and an approach to thermodynamic-limit trends.
Figure 7.
Entropy per site for under isolated interaction terms: exchange (, blue), Zeeman (, green), and dipolar (, red). In the exchange case, the residual entropy decreases with lattice size, while dipolar interactions maintain a finite low-temperature entropy due to frustration. At high temperatures, all curves converge to the expected extensive limit.
Figure 7.
Entropy per site for under isolated interaction terms: exchange (, blue), Zeeman (, green), and dipolar (, red). In the exchange case, the residual entropy decreases with lattice size, while dipolar interactions maintain a finite low-temperature entropy due to frustration. At high temperatures, all curves converge to the expected extensive limit.
Figure 8.
Thermodynamic response of the Ising model () on a lattice as a function of the dipolar ratio . (a) Internal energy decreases with , with the ordering crossover shifting to higher temperatures. (b) Specific heat showing a shift of the main peak to higher temperatures and a progressive broadening as increases; a low-T shoulder appears near .
Figure 8.
Thermodynamic response of the Ising model () on a lattice as a function of the dipolar ratio . (a) Internal energy decreases with , with the ordering crossover shifting to higher temperatures. (b) Specific heat showing a shift of the main peak to higher temperatures and a progressive broadening as increases; a low-T shoulder appears near .
Figure 9.
Entropy and ground-state structure for the Ising model on a lattice as a function of . (a) Entropy showing residual entropy plateaus reflecting changes in ground-state multiplicity. (b) Ground-state multiplicity versus , exhibiting plateaus (twofold, fourfold, sixfold) that match the low-temperature entropy behavior. The inset shows the lowest energy levels whose crossings determine the multiplicity.
Figure 9.
Entropy and ground-state structure for the Ising model on a lattice as a function of . (a) Entropy showing residual entropy plateaus reflecting changes in ground-state multiplicity. (b) Ground-state multiplicity versus , exhibiting plateaus (twofold, fourfold, sixfold) that match the low-temperature entropy behavior. The inset shows the lowest energy levels whose crossings determine the multiplicity.
Figure 10.
Internal energy for a lattice and clock symmetries at selected dipolar ratios (color bar from blue to red). Increasing lowers the low-temperature energy and produces a systematic split between and , reflecting the stronger influence of long-range couplings in clocks with greater angular freedom. At high temperature the curves approach their interaction-dependent saturation; for the energies cluster close to the Ising case at .
Figure 10.
Internal energy for a lattice and clock symmetries at selected dipolar ratios (color bar from blue to red). Increasing lowers the low-temperature energy and produces a systematic split between and , reflecting the stronger influence of long-range couplings in clocks with greater angular freedom. At high temperature the curves approach their interaction-dependent saturation; for the energies cluster close to the Ising case at .
Figure 11.
Specific heat for a lattice and clock symmetries (top) and (bottom) at selected dipolar ratios (color bar from blue to red). For , the main maximum shifts to higher T and broadens with increasing ; a low-temperature shoulder appears for at intermediate . For , the double-peak structure present at small is gradually suppressed, yielding a single broad maximum at larger and nearly indistinguishable high-T tails.
Figure 11.
Specific heat for a lattice and clock symmetries (top) and (bottom) at selected dipolar ratios (color bar from blue to red). For , the main maximum shifts to higher T and broadens with increasing ; a low-temperature shoulder appears for at intermediate . For , the double-peak structure present at small is gradually suppressed, yielding a single broad maximum at larger and nearly indistinguishable high-T tails.
Figure 14.
Ising magnetization for exchange–Zeeman and dipolar–Zeeman couplings on a lattice (, ). (a) Exchange interaction with different values of the external magnetic field B. (b) Dipolar interaction with different values of the external magnetic field B. Color bars indicate the relative field strength in each case.
Figure 14.
Ising magnetization for exchange–Zeeman and dipolar–Zeeman couplings on a lattice (, ). (a) Exchange interaction with different values of the external magnetic field B. (b) Dipolar interaction with different values of the external magnetic field B. Color bars indicate the relative field strength in each case.
Figure 15.
Peak temperatures of the specific heat as a function of the dipolar ratio . Each symbol marks a local maximum of obtained from the full temperature dependence at fixed . (a) Ising case () for . Two points with the same color at a given indicate the coexistence of primary and secondary maxima. Intervals without points indicate that no local maximum is present in that temperature window. (b) Clock models for a lattice and , showing the corresponding symmetry dependence of the peak temperatures.
Figure 15.
Peak temperatures of the specific heat as a function of the dipolar ratio . Each symbol marks a local maximum of obtained from the full temperature dependence at fixed . (a) Ising case () for . Two points with the same color at a given indicate the coexistence of primary and secondary maxima. Intervals without points indicate that no local maximum is present in that temperature window. (b) Clock models for a lattice and , showing the corresponding symmetry dependence of the peak temperatures.
Figure 16.
(Color online) Specific heat as a function of temperature T and the interaction ratio in zero external field. The contour plot highlights low-temperature minima associated with ground-state level crossings, while the vertical cuts (right panels) show thermal activation peaks for selected values of . The lower inset displays , emphasizing the sequence of zeros at the critical points of the model.
Figure 16.
(Color online) Specific heat as a function of temperature T and the interaction ratio in zero external field. The contour plot highlights low-temperature minima associated with ground-state level crossings, while the vertical cuts (right panels) show thermal activation peaks for selected values of . The lower inset displays , emphasizing the sequence of zeros at the critical points of the model.
Figure 17.
(Color online) Energies of the lowest competing configurations as a function of the interaction ratio . The red solid curve marks the minimum energy branch, while the dashed lines indicate the excited configurations that successively become the ground state. The crossings at and correspond to the critical values where the ground state changes discontinuously, in agreement with the low-temperature structure observed in the specific-heat map.
Figure 17.
(Color online) Energies of the lowest competing configurations as a function of the interaction ratio . The red solid curve marks the minimum energy branch, while the dashed lines indicate the excited configurations that successively become the ground state. The crossings at and correspond to the critical values where the ground state changes discontinuously, in agreement with the low-temperature structure observed in the specific-heat map.
Figure 18.
(Color online) Low-temperature specific-heat peaks at as a function of the dipolar ratio . (a) lattice for several Q in the Q-state clock model: sharp peaks for signal ground-state crossings, while larger Q values show only smooth thermal features. At this temperature, the curves for and are nearly superimposed over a wide range of , reflecting the similarity of their low-energy excitation structure at very low T. (b) Ising case () for lattice sizes : odd lattices display two critical points with asymmetric Schottky-like anomalies, whereas the even lattice () exhibits three critical points accompanied by nearly symmetric peaks.
Figure 18.
(Color online) Low-temperature specific-heat peaks at as a function of the dipolar ratio . (a) lattice for several Q in the Q-state clock model: sharp peaks for signal ground-state crossings, while larger Q values show only smooth thermal features. At this temperature, the curves for and are nearly superimposed over a wide range of , reflecting the similarity of their low-energy excitation structure at very low T. (b) Ising case () for lattice sizes : odd lattices display two critical points with asymmetric Schottky-like anomalies, whereas the even lattice () exhibits three critical points accompanied by nearly symmetric peaks.
Table 1.
Number of spin configurations as a function of lattice size L and number of states Q. Values shown in bold indicate the parameter sets that are explicitly calculated and analyzed throughout this work.
Table 1.
Number of spin configurations as a function of lattice size L and number of states Q. Values shown in bold indicate the parameter sets that are explicitly calculated and analyzed throughout this work.
| L |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
|