Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Smart Energy Power: Integrated Soft and Hard Analyses for Stability in Energy Communities

Submitted:

09 January 2026

Posted:

09 January 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Smart Energy Power systems – encompassing oil, gas, nuclear, mining, and electricity – are undergoing rapid transformation driven by digitalization, decarbonization, and geopolitical uncertainty. Ensuring stability in energy communities within this complex, multi-sector landscape requires analytical frameworks that integrate both “hard” and “soft” dimensions of energy systems. This study proposes an integrated approach combining hard analyses, such as capacity and technical capability of energy infrastructures, as well as the security of supply of energy raw materials., with soft analyses, including international relations and energy diplomacy, in the context of stability in energy communities. By bridging technical and social perspectives, the framework captures interdependencies that are often overlooked when sectors or methodologies are treated in isolation. The paper conceptualizes energy communities as adaptive socio-technical systems in which technological performance and social acceptance co-evolve. Through comparative analysis across fossil fuel, nuclear, mining, and electricity domains, the study demonstrates how misalignment between hard and soft factors can amplify instability, while strategic integration enhances resilience and long-term sustainability. The findings highlight the necessity of interdisciplinary planning tools, data-driven decision support, and inclusive governance mechanisms to manage transition risks and operational uncertainties. This integrated model contributes to energy policy and systems engineering by offering a holistic lens for designing stable, smart energy power systems capable of supporting secure, equitable, and resilient energy communities in a rapidly changing global context.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The global energy landscape is undergoing profound transformations driven by the dual imperatives of sustainability and reliability. Traditional energy sources such as oil, gas, and nuclear continue to underpin national energy security, while the rise of renewable electricity, mining for critical resources, and decentralized energy systems are reshaping local and regional energy communities. Ensuring stability within these communities requires a holistic understanding of both the technical infrastructure (hard systems) and the international relations, diplomacy, and energy policy (soft systems) that influence energy production, distribution, and consumption according to geopolitical influences and interests.
This study proposes an integrated approach to energy analysis, combining assessments of “hard” systems – which cover the capacity and capability of energy infrastructures in oil, gas, nuclear, mining, and electricity, as well as the security of energy raw material supply – with assessments of “soft” systems, which include international relations, as well as energy diplomacy and policy. By linking these areas, the research aims to provide actionable insights for the development of resilient, sustainable, and socially inclusive energy communities. [1]
In particular, the study focuses on the interplay between conventional energy sectors (oil, gas, nuclear, and mining) and the evolving electricity landscape, highlighting how coordinated strategies can mitigate risks, enhance stability, and support the transition toward a more integrated energy ecosystem. The integrated soft and hard analyses offer a framework for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and community planners to navigate complex energy challenges while balancing economic, environmental, and social objectives.
The analysis of energy systems – including oil, gas, nuclear power, mining, and electricity – is essential for understanding and optimizing how energy is produced, transported, and consumed. It has multiple objectives and benefits, especially in the context of local and national energy security:
A. Ensuring energy security – Energy security refers to the ability of a community or state to meet its energy needs reliably, at reasonable costs, and with minimal risks. Energy system analysis contributes to this objective through:
  • Assessment of available resources: Estimating reserves of oil, gas, or minerals needed for energy production;
  • Identification of vulnerabilities: Detecting critical points in infrastructure (e.g., power grids, gas pipelines) that could cause major disruptions;
  • Crisis scenarios: Analyzing the impact of potential external shocks, such as embargoes, natural disasters, or cyberattacks on energy systems.
B. Planning and optimization of production and consumption:
  • Efficiency and sustainability: Enables the adoption of strategies to reduce energy losses and optimize costs;
  • Integration of energy sources: Analyses help plan the energy mix, combining traditional sources (oil, gas, nuclear) with renewable sources (solar, wind, hydro) to reduce dependence on a single resource;
  • Demand and supply management: Energy consumption forecasts allow for production adjustments and help prevent shortages or overproduction.
C. Supporting energy communities:
  • Autonomy and resilience: Energy communities (e.g., solar energy cooperatives or local microgrids) can use analytics to efficiently manage their energy production and storage;
  • Reducing vulnerability: A better understanding of energy systems enables communities to minimize the impact of price fluctuations or supply chain disruptions;
  • Participation in energy decision-making: Analytics provide concrete data that support informed decisions regarding local investments and policies.
D. Strategic planning at the state level:
  • Energy policies: Governments can develop energy security strategies, including strategic oil/gas reserves, safe nuclear infrastructure, and resilient power grids;
  • Reducing external dependence: Analyzing energy systems helps identify opportunities for domestic production and diversification of sources;
  • Energy transition: Enables states to plan the shift to cleaner energy sources without compromising supply stability.
E. Risk management and sustainability:
  • Environmental impact assessment: Analyses allow the measurement of the effects of energy production and consumption on the environment and public health;
  • Technological risk mitigation: Especially in the nuclear or mining sectors, energy system analysis helps prevent accidents and implement safety measures;
  • Long-term sustainability: It helps balance supply and demand, prevents resource depletion, and promotes a sustainable energy mix.
Energy system analyses are not merely a technical exercise; they form the foundation for strategic decisions aimed at:
  • Ensuring the energy security of communities and nations;
  • Optimizing resources and infrastructure;
  • Transitioning toward more sustainable and resilient energy.
In a world where energy dependence is critical for both the economy and national security, these analyses become an indispensable tool for planning and protection. [2]

2. State of Art

Energy security is a critical factor for national development, economic stability, and the well-being of communities. It involves reliable access to energy resources at affordable prices while minimizing environmental and geopolitical risks. Analyses of various energy systems – oil, natural gas, nuclear, mining, and electricity – are essential to assess vulnerabilities, optimize supply, and plan for long-term sustainability. [3]
A. Oil and Natural Gas Systems
National situation:
  • Dependence on imports – many countries rely heavily on imported oil and gas, making them vulnerable to price volatility and supply disruptions;
  • Domestic production – nations with domestic reserves focus on exploration, extraction, and refining capacity to ensure self-sufficiency;
  • Strategic reserves – countries maintain strategic petroleum reserves to buffer against crises or supply shocks;
  • Challenges – aging infrastructure, limited refining capacity, and geopolitical tensions can threaten energy security.
International situation:
  • Global market volatility – oil and gas markets are highly sensitive to geopolitical events, such as conflicts in the Middle East or sanctions on key producers;
  • Energy transition pressures – international efforts to reduce fossil fuel dependence push countries to diversify into renewables, impacting long-term investment in oil and gas;
  • Collaboration – international pipelines, LNG trade, and multilateral agreements (e.g., OPEC) affect supply stability<
Community impact: Disruptions in oil and gas supply can lead to increased fuel prices, affecting household budgets and local industries.
B. Nuclear Energy Systems
National situation:
  • Energy diversification – nuclear energy provides a stable, low-carbon base load to complement intermittent renewables;
  • Safety and regulation – strong regulatory frameworks are needed to manage risks of accidents, radioactive waste, and plant security;
  • Development – some nations are expanding nuclear capacity to ensure long-term energy security.
International situation:
  • Technological cooperation – international agencies (like the IAEA) provide guidance for safety, regulation, and nuclear technology transfer;
  • Global risks – nuclear proliferation and accidents are major concerns for international energy security;
  • Supply of uranium – uranium markets are concentrated; geopolitical factors can influence availability.
Community impact – nuclear energy provides a stable electricity supply, reducing vulnerability to fuel price shocks, but public concerns about safety are significant.
C. Mining and critical minerals system
National situation:
  • Resource exploration – countries rich in minerals like lithium, cobalt, and rare earths focus on domestic mining to support energy and technology sectors;
  • Environmental management – mining activities must balance resource extraction with environmental sustainability and community well-being;
  • Industrial policy – governments may incentivize local processing to reduce dependence on foreign supply chains.
International situation:
  • Global supply chains – critical minerals are often concentrated in a few countries (e.g., lithium in South America, cobalt in the DRC), creating vulnerability;
  • Trade tensions – export restrictions or trade disputes can disrupt access to key resources for energy storage and technology<
Community impact: Local mining activities can provide jobs but also pose environmental and health challenges if poorly regulated.
D. Electricity Systems
National situation:
  • Grid reliability – countries invest in transmission and distribution infrastructure to reduce outages and integrate renewable energy sources;
  • Decentralization – microgrids and distributed energy systems enhance community-level energy security;
  • Energy mix – combining fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables reduces dependence on a single energy source.
International situation:
  • Interconnected grids – cross-border electricity trading (e.g., in Europe) helps balance supply and demand;
  • Cybersecurity threats – modern grids face risks from cyberattacks, affecting community access to electricity<
Community impact: Stable electricity supply supports hospitals, schools, and local industries, directly affecting quality of life.
Key trends in energy security analysis:
  • Integration of energy sources – modeling systems combining oil, gas, nuclear, renewables, and storage for resilient planning;
  • Risk assessment – evaluating geopolitical, environmental, and technical risks affecting national and community energy security;
  • Transition to low-carbon energy – countries are increasingly analyzing systems to meet climate goals without compromising security;
  • Digitalization and smart grids – advanced monitoring and predictive tools enhance reliability and responsiveness;
  • Community-focused strategies – decentralized energy generation, local storage, and efficiency measures strengthen local resilience.
Ensuring energy security for communities requires a multifaceted approach:
  • Strengthening domestic production and strategic reserves for fossil fuels;
  • Expanding safe nuclear capacity with proper oversight;
  • Developing mining and critical mineral industries responsibly;
  • Building resilient and flexible electricity grids;
  • Considering international dependencies and risks in policy planning.
Energy system analyses at national and international levels are critical to identify vulnerabilities, plan for emergencies, and support sustainable development. Communities benefit when these analyses translate into policies that ensure reliable, affordable, and environmentally sound energy access. [4,5]

3. Smart Energy Power Analysis

3.1. The Concept of Smart Energy Power

Smart power represents the strategic combination of hard power (economic, military, or infrastructural strength, sanctions, or direct threats) and soft power (influence through attractiveness, diplomacy, democracy, and permissive policies).
In the Energy Sector (oil, gas, nuclear, mining, and electricity), this concept involves the use of a combination of methods:
  • Hard power: economic and coercive pressure, infrastructural strength, ownership and control of strategic energy resources, strategic investments – the goal is to maximize influence in a strategic Energy Sector, relying exclusively on threat, sanction, coercion, or domination;
  • Soft power: strong international relations, international cooperation, robust energy diplomacy, permissive energy policies, promotion of green technologies, environmental standards, and sustainable energy policies that attract partners through mutual benefits – the goal is to maximize influence in a strategic energy sector without relying solely on coercion or domination. (Figure 1) [5,6,7,8,9]
Examples of Smart Energy Power:
  • EU and the energy transition: The EU uses hard power through sanctions against Russia for gas, but also soft power by promoting green energy and providing funds for the energy transition in partner countries;
  • China and the Belt and Road Initiative: A combination of hard power (investments in energy infrastructure and control of resources) and soft power (technology transfer, “win-win” projects);
  • Romania: Can use soft power by promoting renewable energy and know-how in hydro and wind, and hard power through strategic participation in regional energy networks (e.g., interconnections with Hungary, Bulgaria, Moldova, or Greece).

3.2. Hard Power Analysis

The Romanian Energy Sector is composed of the following systems (Figure 2): [10,11,12,13,14]
  • The National Oil System – exploration, extraction, transportation, storage, refining, and distribution of oil and petroleum products;
  • The National Gas System – exploration, extraction, transportation, storage, and distribution of natural gas;
  • The National Nuclear System – extraction and processing of uranium ore, nuclear fuel manufacturing, heavy water production, and electricity generation;
  • The National Mining System – extraction, transportation, storage, and distribution of coal (hard coal and lignite), and electricity generation;
  • The National Power System – generation, transmission, distribution, and supply of electricity to consumers (household, industrial, and critical).

3.2.1. The National Oil System

A. Essential informations
Oil and oil derivatives are natural resources of strategic importance for Romania and represent the most important fuels in the Romanian economy. Their use takes place in almost all segments of energy consumption: electricity production; heating and cooking of the population; transport (air, land, sea, etc.); industrial activities.
The following oil operations are carried out within the National Oil System: exploration; development; exploitation; extraction; production; storage; transport; distribution; supply.
In Romania there are several state or private companies operating in all segments of oil operations, but the main companies are described below:
a) OMV Petrom
OMV Petrom Group is the largest producer of oil in Southeast Europe, with activities in the sectors of exploration, natural gas and electricity production, natural gas marketing and oil and fuel storage.
OMV Petrom's infrastructure consists of: [15]
  • Upstream: oil and gas exploration and production: 193 on-shore and offshore commercial oil and gas fields; exploration in the perimeter of Neptune Deep and Han Asparuh – Black Sea: ~ 7000 production wells;1000 facilities; 13 000 km. of pipeline;
  • Downstream Oil: Petrobrazi refinery (annual capacity of 4,5 million tons of oil); 110 oil and condensate storage depots; 13 gasoline storage depots; 8 fuel storage depots (Jilava, Brazi, Ișalnița, Timișoara, Deva, Bacău, Cluj, Arad); 403 Petrom fuel stations; 151 OMV gas stations;
  • Downstream Gas: natural gas (production, processing, marketing, supply) which covers about 40% of the demand for natural gas in Romania; electricity (production and supply): Brazi power plant – 860 MW.
b) Petroleum Services Group
Petroleum Services Group, is a company that operates in the marine drilling and related services sector in Romania.
The Petroleum Services Group infrastructure is composed of: [16]
  • 9 offshore drilling rigs: Atlas, Fortuna, Jupiter, Orizont, Prometeu, Saturn, Uranus, Deep Driller, Alpha;
  • 10 multifunctional ships: King, Queen, Vega, Antares, Alcor, Orion, Centaurus, Unicorn, Perseus, Phoenix;
  • 2 heavy barge cranes: Neptune, Granite;
  • 2 marine ships: Bigfoot 1, Bigfoot 2.
c) Conpet
CONPET is the operator of the National Oil and Gasoline Transport System and its main object of activity is the transport by pipeline and by rail of oil, condensate and gasoline obtained from domestic production, as well as the pipeline transport of imported crude oil to refineries in Romania.
CONPET carries out its operational and administrative activities in 24 counties, by 3200 km. of pipelines.
The National Oil and Gasoline Transport System is the set of interconnected pipelines that ensure the collection of oil extracted from the perimeters of exploitation or imported and directed from the points of delivery, by producers / importers, to processing units, through pumping stations, loading ramps - unloading on the railway, as well as through all installations, equipment and endowments related to them.
As a concessionaire of National Transport System, the company CONPET has the legal obligation to ensure all applicants - legal entities authorized, free access to the available capacity of the system, on equal terms, in a non-discriminatory and transparent manner.
Infrastructure CONPET It consists of the following facilities (elements) and is structured around four main subsystems (Figure 3) [17]
  • Domestic Oil Subsystem: 1 173 km. pipelines (6,2 million tons / year transport capacity); 120 000 m3 storage capacity; 47 pumping stations: Urziceni, Grindu, Cartojani, Potlogi, Videle, Poieni, Izvoru, Icoana, Lact, Ghercești, Siliștea, Boldești, Gura Vitioaiei, Păcureți, Predealul Sărari, Surani, Urlați, Băicoi, Mislea, Recea, Moreni, Teiș, Ochiuri, Saru, Oarja, Poiana Lacului, Otești, Orlești, Mădulari, Vârteju, Iancu Jianu, Bărbătești, Țicleni, Naidăș, Satchinez, Bodrog, Turnu, Petreu, Oprineșești, Lascăr, Ghelința, Cerdac, Lucăcești, Comănești;
  • Import Oil Subsystem: 971 km. pipelines (12,5 million tons / year transport capacity); 79 500 m3 storage capacity; 7 pumping stations: Constanța Sud, Mircea Vodă, Bărăganu, Dragoș Vodă, Călăreți, Mavrodin, Mărtinești;
  • Gasoline / Liquid Ethane Subsystem: 28 km. pipelines (0,073 million tons / year transport capacity); 250 m3 storage capacity; 3 gasoline pumping stations: Călacea, Abrămuți, Turburea;
  • Oil / Gasoline Railway Subsystem: 13 oil and condensate loading ramps; 2 gasoline loading ramps; 13 locomotives. 55 railway wagons; 12,7 railway infrastructure; 69 oil and gasoline boilers.
d) Oil Terminal
Oil Terminal is the largest operator of petroleum products at sea, specialized in the transportation / storage of oil, liquid petrochemicals and other products and raw materials for import / export and transit.
The Oil terminal infrastructure consists of: [18]
  • 3 oil storage deposits, petroleum products and petrochemicals: North Platform Section – 290 000 m3 for heavy fuel and VGO; Port Platform Section – 105 000 m3 for petroleum products and chemical liquids; South Platform Section – 965 000 m3 for crude oil, petrol, diesel and fuel;
  • Tanks with capacities ranging from 1 000 m3 to 55 000 m3, of metal construction, cylindrical, installed vertically – aboveground, equipped with protective belts, with fixed or floating roofs, and with fire-fighting systems. Some of the tanks are equipped with automatic measuring systems, such as radar, for the level and temperature of the stored product;
  • Loading/unloading capacities for petroleum and liquid chemical products, consisting of ramps and internal railways with a total length of approximately 30 km, equipped with loading/unloading facilities;
  • Loading installations for products into tank trucks;
  • Pipelines for the loading/unloading to/from ships of crude oil, petroleum products, petrochemicals, liquid chemicals, and oils, with diameters ranging from 100 mm. to 1000 mm.;
  • Pump houses capable of achieving flow rates between 300 m3/h and 2 500 m3/h.;
  • Weighing for tank trucks and railway tank cars;
  • Computerized metering installations located in the immediate vicinity of the diesel, gasoline, and crude oil loading/unloading docks;
  • Laboratories equipped with equipment for performing specific physicochemical analyses;
  • Installations on the loading quay for products from barges (crude oil, diesel, gasoline, fuel oil) and for bunkering ships with light and heavy fuel in all oil berths.
e) Rompetrol Refine
Rompetrol Rafinare SA is the main brand of KMG International, a group owned by KazMunayGas, the national oil and gas company in Kazakhstan. The Rompetrol Rafinare brand is representative of refining and petrochemical operations.
The Rompetrol Rafinare infrastructure is composed of: [19]
  • Petromidia Refinery (5 million tons per year): Petromidia is strategically located on the shore of the Black Sea in Năvodari, 20 km north of the Port of Constanța; Logistical Advantages: Own marine terminal; Facilities at Midia Port: berths 1–4 for crude oil and products, and berths 9 (A, B, and C) for petroleum product exports; Own railway logistics system; Access to the Danube–Black Sea Canal; The marine terminal is the refinery’s most important logistical asset. It is located 8.6 km offshore and can accommodate vessels of up to 160 000 TDW; Through this terminal and the entire logistics system developed by the company in the region, Romania has the potential to become an energy hub—a regional platform connecting natural resources from Asia with European demand for raw material processing and petroleum product supply;
  • Vega Refinery;
  • Petrochemical Division: PP (polypropylene) installation; LDPE (low density polyethylene) installation; HDPE (high density polyethylene) installation; the only marine terminal on the Black Sea; cryogenic tank (10,000 tons);
  • Rompetrol Downstream: 922 fuel distribution points; 8 fuel depots: Petromidia Năvodari, Arad, Craiova, Mogoșoaia, Șimleul Silvaniei, Vatra Dornei, Zărnești;
  • Rompetrol Gas: 210 LPG stations; 8 000 cylinder distribution points; 3 bottling stations (Năvodari, Arad, Bacău); 3 LPG / propane / butane deposits: Mogoșoaia, Pantelimon, Dumbrava.
f) Lukoil
Lukoil Romania is one of the most significant players on the Romanian oil market with refining and distribution of petroleum products.
Lukoil's infrastructure consists of: [20]
  • Petrotel Lukoil Refinery;
  • 310 fuel distribution stations;
  • 7 fuel depots: Lukoil Ploiești, Râmnicu Vâlcea, Brașov, Cluj, Arad, Oil Terminal Constanța, Oil Terminal Galați.
B. Oil supply
Romania has a relatively unique position in the EU, as it produces oil but not enough to meet its domestic consumption, so it is partially dependent on imports.
a) Domestic production:
  • Romania is one of the few oil producers in the European Union;
  • Domestic production mainly comes from onshore fields (Muntenia, Moldova, Transylvania) and offshore fields in the Black Sea (less than for gas);
  • Main producer: OMV Petrom;
  • Long-term trend: gradual decline in production due to the maturity of the fields.
b) Oil imports
To cover refining and consumption needs:
  • Romania imports crude oil, primarily for refineries;
  • Frequent sources (in recent years): Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, and other countries in the Black Sea region and the Middle East;
  • After 2022, dependence on Russian oil was significantly reduced, in line with EU policies.
c) Supply infrastructure:
  • Port of Constanța – a key point for crude oil imports by sea, through the company Oil Terminal Constanța;
  • Pipelines and rail transport for supplying refineries, via Conpet, which is the transport operator in Romania;
  • Major refineries: Petromidia (operated by Rompetrol Rafinare – KMG International) – the largest in Romania and a pillar of the refining industry; Vega Ploiești (operated by Rompetrol Rafinare – KMG International); Petrobrazi (operated by OMV Petrom); Petrotel Lukoil (operated by Lukoil).
d) Degree of dependence:
  • Approximately 30–40% of the oil demand is met through domestic production, while the remainder comes from imports (values may vary annually).
e) Energy security:
  • Romania maintains strategic oil reserves and has diversified sources, which reduces the major risk of disruption;
  • Oil remains important for transportation, the petrochemical industry, and less so for electricity generation.
C. The complete oil cycle
Romania being a country with multiple and rich hydrocarbon resources (on-shore and off-shore), has at this moment a competitive advantage, by the fact that on the territory of our country and in the Romanian territorial waters, there is a complete oil cycle: (Table 1) [8,10,13,14]
In order for the oil cycle to be complete, through the 7 stages, it is mandatory that the main actors involved are present, namely:
  • National Agency for Mineral Resources - which owns the hydrocarbon resource;
  • On-shore / off-shore prospecting operators - prospecting the hydrocarbon resource;
  • Exploration - development - on-shore / off-shore exploitation operators - who explore, develop and exploit the hydrocarbon resource;
  • Transmission operators - which transport oil and petroleum products through pipelines to distribution operators;
  • Warehousing operators - which store oil and petroleum products for strategic purposes;
  • Refining operators - who refine oil and turn it into petroleum products;
  • Distribution operators - which distribute through pipelines or other means, oil and petroleum products to supply operators;
D. Oil pressure instrument
Definition: Anything action or inaction of an oil energy chain actor (s) HOLDER RESOURCE (hydrocarbon) - PROSPECTOR (hydrocarbon) - EXPLORER / DEVELOPER / EXPLOITER (hydrocarbon) - CARRIER (oil) – STORAGE (oil) - REFINER (oil → petroleum products) - DISTRIBUTOR (petroleum products), directly or indirectly related to the energy resources of oil (hydrocarbons) and petroleum products, to influence the behavior of other actors, to control or eliminate them, in order to achieve their own interests (Figure 4)
The pressure tool can be used throughout the chain by any of the "links" involved in this process. [8,10,13,14]

3.2.2. National Gas System

A. Essential informations
Gas are natural resources of strategic importance for Romania and represent the most important fuels in the Romanian economy. Their use takes place in almost all segments of energy consumption: electricity production; heating and cooking of the population; transport (air, land, sea, etc.); industrial activities.
The following gas operations are carried out within the National Gas System: exploration; development; exploitation; extraction; production; storage; transport; distribution; supply.
In Romania there are several state or private companies operating in all segments of oil operations, but the main companies are described below:
a) Romgaz
Romgaz is the largest natural gas producer in Romania and has the objects of exploration, extraction, natural gas and electricity production, natural gas trading, technological transport, well operations and natural gas storage.
The Romgaz infrastructure is composed of: [21]
  • On-shore exploration: 8 perimeters of exploration - development - exploitation (3 projects: Transylvanian Central Basin, Moldova and Muntenia);
  • Offshore exploration: perimeter EX Trident - Black Sea;
  • Natural gas production: 2 production branches: Mediaș and Târgu Mureș; 140 commercial deposits; ~ 3,240 probes; manifolds, gas heaters, impurity separators, compressors, drying stations, gas measuring panels;
  • Electricity production: Iernut Thermal Power Plant – 600 MW;
  • Natural gas trading;
  • Technological transport: freight transport; passenger transportation; specific technological transport and maintenance;Well operations (intervention, repairs and production tests);
  • Natural gas storage (Depogaz Ploiești): 6 warehouses: Bilciurești, Sărmășel, Urziceni, Ghercești, Bălăceanca, Cetatea de Baltă.
b) OMV Petrom
OMV Petrom SA Group is the largest producer of natural gas in Southeast Europe, with activities in the sectors of exploration, natural gas and electricity production, natural gas marketing and oil and fuel storage.
OMV Petrom's infrastructure consists of: [15]
  • Upstream: oil and gas exploration and production: 193 on-shore and offshore commercial oil and gas fields; exploration in the perimeter of Neptune Deep - Black Sea: ~ 7000 production wells; ~ 1000 facilities; ~ 13,000 km of pipeline;
  • Downstream Oil: Petrobrazi refinery (annual capacity of 4.5 million tons of oil); 110 oil and condensate storage depots; 13 gasoline storage depots; 8 fuel storage depots (Jilava, Brazi, Ișalnița, Timișoara, Deva, Bacău, Cluj, Arad); 403 Petrom fuel stations; 151 OMV gas stations;
  • Downstream Gas: natural gas (production, processing, marketing, supply) which covers about 40% of the demand for natural gas in Romania; electricity (production and supply): Brazi power plant - 860 MW.
c) Transgaz
The natural gas transmission activity is carried out by Transgaz, which is the technical operator of the National Transport System – Natural Gas and ensures the fulfillment in conditions of efficiency, transparency, safety, non-discriminatory access and competitiveness of the national strategy on domestic and international transport. of natural gas and gas dispatching, as well as research and design in the field specific to its activity, in compliance with the requirements of European and national legislation, quality standards, performance, environment and sustainable development.
Operation by Transgaz of the National Gas Transmission System (NGTS) mainly includes the activities: trade balancing; contracting natural gas transmission services; dispatching and technological regimes; natural gas quality measurement and monitoring; natural gas odorization; regulations, authorizations and licenses - technical and commercial regulations, the activity of international natural gas transmission.
NGTS was designed as an interconnected radial-annular system and having as starting points the large natural gas deposits in the Transylvanian Basin (central country), Oltenia and later Eastern Muntenia (southern country).
The destination was the big consumers from the Ploieşti area - Bucharest, Moldova, Oltenia, as well as those from the central area (Transylvania) and the north of the country. Subsequently, natural gas flows underwent significant changes due to the decline of sources in the Transylvanian Basin, Moldova, Oltenia and the emergence of other sources (imports, OMV-Petrom, concessions made by third parties, etc.), given that the natural gas transmission infrastructure remained same.
The transport infrastructure of NGTS Transgaz consists of the following facilities (elements): (Figure 5) [22]
  • 13 430 km. of pipes;
  • 5 compression stations;
  • 58 control stations valves and / or technological nodes;
  • 1 038 cathodic protection stations;
  • 902 gas odor stations;
  • 11 interconnections with other transport systems: Arad - Csanadpalota (Hungary); Iasi - Ungheni (Republic of Moldova); Giurgiu - Ruse (Bulgaria); Negru Vodă 1 - Kardam (Bulgaria); Negru Vodă 2 - Kardam (Bulgaria); Negru Vodă 3 - Kardam (Bulgaria); Medieșu Aurit (import) - Tekovo (Ukraine); Isaccea (import) - Orlovka (Ukraine); Isaccea 1 - Orlovka (Ukraine); Isaccea 2 - Orlovka (Ukraine); Isaccea 3 - Orlovka (Ukraine);
  • 7 connections to storage facilities: Sărmaș - Romgaz; Bălăceanca - Romgaz; Butimanu - Romgaz; Balta Fortress - Romgaz; Ghercești - Romgaz; Urziceni - Romgaz; Târgu Mureș – Depomureș;
  • 131 interconnections with production facilities: 77 - Romgaz; 36 - OMV Petrom; 13 - Amronco; 1 - Raffles Energy; 1 - Lotus Petrol; 1 - Stratum Energy; 1 - Hunt Oil Company; 1 - Serinus Energy;
  • 926 interconnections with distribution systems: 894 - physical exit points; 32 - number of distribution system operators;
  • 225 interconnections with direct consumers: 15 physical output points - direct consumers (gas power plants); 19 physical output points - direct consumers (industrial combined); 167 physical exit points - direct consumers (commercial consumers); 24 physical exit points - direct consumers (residential consumers);
  • 85 interconnections between production facilities and distribution systems: 85 physical entry / exit points - direct natural gas delivery.
d) Natural gas distribution operators
Natural gas companies operating in Romania: Delgaz Grid; Distrigaz Sud Rețele; Distrigaz Vest; Gaz Est; Gaz Nord Est; Gaz Vest; Gazmir Iași; Nord Gaz; Megaconstruct; CPL Concordia Filiala Cluj Romania; Prisma Serv Company; Salgaz; Tulcea Gaz; Mehedinți Gaz; Dornacor Invest; Instant Construct Company; Euro Seven Industry; BtdConstruct & Ambient; Antoprest Activ; NeoGas Grid; Oligopol; Design Proiect; Nova Power & Gas; Mihoc Oil.
e) Natural Gas Supply Operators
Natural gas companies operating in Romania: OMV Petrom; ENGIE România; E.ON Energie Romania; Premier Energy Furnizare; PROGAZ P&D; GES Furnizare; MIHOC OIL; C Gaz & Energy Distributie; LORD ENERGY; Gas & Power Trading; M.D.A. Energy; Alpha Project Tehnology; Dacia Energy Solutions; Gaz Nord Est; Energy Gas Provider; Hermes Energy & Gas; Local Gaz; Crest Energy; Conef Gaz; Veolia Energie România; ELECTRICA Furnizare; PPC Energie; ENGIE România; E.ON Energie România; OMV Petrom; Premier Energy.
B. Gas supply
a) Romania’s natural gas sources
Romania has significant domestic natural gas resources, primarily located in:
  • The Black Sea – offshore fields, the most well-known being Neptun Deep and Domino. The exploitation of these resources is under development and could cover a substantial part of domestic consumption in the coming years;
  • Onshore fields – mainly in the Transylvania and Banat regions, operated by companies such as Romgaz and Petrom. These already provide a significant portion of domestic production;
  • Romania produces approximately 11–12 billion m3 of natural gas annually (2024 data), covering around 80% of domestic consumption.
b) Natural gas imports
Although Romania is relatively energy independent, imports are necessary, especially during periods of high consumption (winter) or when domestic production decreases.
Main suppliers: in the past, Russia was the main external supplier, but in recent years Romania has diversified its sources through imports from Hungary, Slovakia, and Austria.
Romania’s gas network is connected to regional transit corridors, allowing flexible imports and even transit to other European countries.
c) Transport and Storage Infrastructure:
  • Gas Transport: The national transmission network is operated by Transgaz and includes approximately 13 000 km of pipelines. It enables the distribution of both domestic and imported gas to all regions of the country;
  • Underground Gas Storage: Romania has several underground storage facilities capable of storing over 3 billion m3, ensuring supply security during periods of high demand. Examples: Sărmășel, Bilciurești, Ghercești.
d) Romania's strategy on energy supply
Romania pursues an energy security policy based on:
  • Increasing domestic production, including through the exploitation of the Black Sea;
  • Diversifying imports to reduce dependence on a single source;
  • Modernizing infrastructure, including the construction of new pipelines and interconnections with neighboring countries;
  • Strategic storage for critical periods.
e) Challenges and perspectives:
  • Exploiting natural gas from the Black Sea depends on large investments and environmental legislation;
  • Domestic demand increases slightly each year, especially in the context of the transition to cleaner energy;
  • Romania's integration into the European gas market offers opportunities, but also pressures related to price and competitiveness.
f) Conclusion
Romania is relatively well-supplied with natural gas, with a mix of domestic resources and diversified imports. In the coming years, the exploitation of the Black Sea and the development of infrastructure could transform the country into a regional gas exporter, strengthening energy security.
C. The complete gas cycle in Romania
Romania being a country with multiple and rich hydrocarbon resources (on-shore and off-shore), has at this moment a competitive advantage, by the fact that on the territory of our country and in the Romanian territorial waters, there is a complete oil cycle: (Table 2) [8,10,13,14]
In order for the oil cycle to be complete, through the 7 stages, it is mandatory that the main actors involved are present, namely:
  • National Agency for Mineral Resources - which owns the hydrocarbon resource;
  • On-shore / off-shore prospecting operators - prospecting the hydrocarbon resource;
  • Exploration – Development - on-shore / off-shore exploitation operators - who explore, develop and exploit the hydrocarbon resource;
  • Transmission operators - which transport natural gas through pipelines to distribution operators;
  • Storage operators – which store natural gas for strategic purposes;
  • Distribution operators – which distribute through pipelines or other means, natural gas to supply operators;
  • Supply operators – which supply natural gas to consumers through pipelines or other means.
D. Gas pressure tool
Definition: Anything action or inaction of an gas energy chain actor (s) HOLDER RESOURCE (hydrocarbon) – PROSPECTOR (hydrocarbon) – EXPLORER / DEVELOPER / EXPLOITER (hydrocarbon) – CARRIER (natural gas) – STORAGE (natural gas ) – DISTRIBUTOR (natural gas) – SUPPLIER (natural gas), directly or indirectly related to the energy resources of gas, to influence the behavior of other actors, to control or eliminate them, in order to achieve their own interests (Figure 6)
The pressure tool can be used throughout the chain by any of the "links" involved in this process. [8,10,13,14]

3.2.3. Nuclear Power System

A. Essential informations
Romania has over 65 years of experience in the nuclear industry, and the main national actors from the exploitation, preparation and refining of uranium ore, to the manufacture of nuclear fuel, the operation of nuclear reactors and implicitly the production of nuclear electricity, are as follows: National Uranium Company, Nuclearelectrica, Autonomous Directorate for Nuclear Activities, National Center for Heavy Water Management, ROMAG PROD Heavy Water Plant Drobeta Turnu Severin.
In Romania there are several state or private companies operating in all segments of nuclear operations, but the main companies are described below:
a) National Uranium Company
National Uranium Company – NUC is a state-owned company within the Ministry of Energy, established in 1997 and manages the existing uranium mineral resources in Romania.
NUC is part of the nuclear fuel cycle in Romania, by exploiting uranium and preparing the raw material for the manufacture of nuclear fuel and contributes to increasing the share of uranium as a primary source in the energy balance of our country.
NUC is the only producer and supplier of UO2 (uranium dioxide) in Romania, intended for the manufacture of nuclear fuel for CANDU 6 type reactors at the Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant.
Activities: exploitation of uranium deposits; preparation of ores and obtaining uranium concentrates; refining of concentrates and recovery of pure nuclear UO2 (uranium dioxide); conservation; closure and greening of discontinued operations.
Organization: [23]
NUC is organized on 4 subunits in the territory:
  • Suceava Branch (uranium ore production);
  • Feldioara branch (processing, refining);
  • Oravița Sector (conservation, closure, greening);
  • Steel Sector (conservation, closure, greening).
Description of Suceava Branch:
Suceava branch ensures the production of uranium ore necessary for the Feldioara plant by exploiting two mineralized structures (uranium mining operations):
  • Uranium Crucea Mining (Suceava County);
  • Uranium Botușana Mining (Suceava County).
The mineralization is located mainly on directional and support faults, being represented by pechblenda and uranium associated with bitumen, and the deposit is open with two wells and coastal galleries. Underground and surface activities and works: exploitation through wells and coastal galleries; detailed exploration works, during the exploitation phase, through mining works and underground drilling; conservation works in order to close and green the perimeters affected by the previous mining activity; mine water treatment in depollution stations, landfill facilities, regularization of watercourses, access and exploitation roads; shipment of uranium ore by car and rail. Currently, the activity is in full process of restructuring, re-equipment and refurbishment of production, and in the future, it is planned to continue the activity at the Botușana Mine as well as to attract new uranium perimeters in the economic circuit.
Description of Feldioara Branch (Brașov County):
The Feldioara branch (platform) was designed and built as a result of the need to process uranium ore in the country in accordance with the national nuclear program and consists of the following plants:
  • Processing Plant - R Plant: uranium ore is processed by a hydrometallurgical process, following which the technical concentrate of sodium diuranate - Na2U2O7 is obtained;
  • Uranium Concentrate Technical Refining Plant - Plant E: the process continues with the production of uranium oxide (stable intermediate product) and the sinterable uranium dioxide powder - UO2 (raw material for the manufacture of nuclear fuel needed for CANDU type nuclear power plants).
Description of the Oravița Sector (working point):
Between 1952 and 1997, uranium ore was mined here in the Dobra, Natra and Ciudanovița mines, but due to the depletion of exploitable reserves, conservation, closure and greening activities are currently being carried out.
Description of the Steel Sector (working point):
Due to the depletion of exploitable reserves, conservation, closure and greening activities are currently being carried out in the Băița Plai and Avram Iancu mines.
b) Nuclearelectrica
Description: Nuclearelectrica is a state-owned company within the Ministry of Energy and is the only producer of electricity based on nuclear technology in Romania. Nuclearelectrica produces CANDU 6 – type nuclear fuel bundles that are used to operate its own nuclear reactors. [24]
Activities: electricity production; nuclear energy production; nuclear fuel production.
Organization: Nuclearelectrica is organized on 2 branches in the territory:
  • Pitesti Nuclear Fuel Factory branch (nuclear fuel manufacturing);
  • Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant branch (operation of units 1 and 2).
Description of the Pitesti Nuclear Fuel Factory Branch (Mioveni):
The production of CANDU nuclear fuel began in 1980, with the commissioning of the pilot station as a fuel section within the Pitesti Nuclear Research Institute, and the separation of the Nuclear Fuel Plant as a separate entity was made in 1992.
In 1994, the Nuclear Fuel Plant – was licensed by AECL and Zircatec precision Industries Inc. (Canada) as a producer of CANDU type 6 nuclear fuel.
Pitesti Nuclear Fuel Factory produces approximately 10,800 nuclear fuel bundles annually for Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant.
Pitesti Nuclear Fuel Factory is composed of two sections:
  • Pills Section - manufacture of UO 2 tablets using uranium dioxide powder as raw material;
  • Assembly Section - manufacture of: zircaloy components for the beam; fuel elements; CANDU 6 type fuel bundles.
Description of Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant branch:
Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant branch ensures the safe operation of Nuclear Units 1 and 2 with an installed capacity of 700 MW, which provides approximately 20% of Romania's energy needs. Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant branch uses Canadian CANDU 6 (Canadian Deuterium Uranium) technology using natural uranium as fuel and heavy water as moderator and coolant.
Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant branch consists of the following:
  • Nuclear Unit 1: fuel: natural uranium - UO2; moderator and coolant: heavy water (deuterium oxide) - D2O;
  • Nuclear Unit 2: fuel: natural uranium - UO2; moderator and coolant: heavy water (deuterium oxide) - D2O.
c) Autonomous Directorate for Nuclear Activities
Description: Autonomous Directorate for Nuclear Activities – ADNA is an autonomous directorate of national strategic interest within the Ministry of Energy, established in 1998.
Activities: heavy water production; electricity and heat production; research and technological engineering activities for nuclear purposes.
Current stage: bankruptcy. [25]
d) National Heavy Water Management Center – Drobeta Turnu Severin
National Heavy Water Management Center is a branch of the Autonomous Authority for Nuclear Activities and is located in Drobeta Turnu Severin and produced: super water; heavy water; super heavy water. Heavy water (deuterium oxide) - D2O is used in nuclear installations as: moderator; cooling agent. Heavy water production began in 1987, fed the Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant as well as numerous international markets and had the largest capacity in the world (360 tons / year).
Since 2001, the National Heavy Water Management has become an exporter of nuclear and laboratory heavy water to South Korea, China, Germany, the USA and Switzerland. At the moment, heavy water is no longer produced, but there are huge stocks stored in the state reserve.
Current stage: bankruptcy. [26]
e) Storage and storage of radioactive waste
Radioactive waste management is a strategic structure within the Nuclearelectrica. Radioactive waste is the result of daily maintenance, repair, scheduled or unscheduled plant shutdowns and is managed completely separately from conventional waste. The radioactive waste generated by these activities is: solid (plastic, cellulose, glass, wood, purification filters, ventilation filters, etc.); organic liquids (oil, solvent, scintillating liquid); flammable solid-liquid mixtures. Their collection and sorting is carried out by qualified personnel, according to the rules and criteria specified by the procedures, and the sorting activity applies to all types of radioactive waste. Different criteria are followed for each type of radioactive waste (solids, organic liquids and flammable solid-liquid mixtures): source of origin (service building, reactor building); type of material (plastic, cellulose, metal, wood, oil, solvents, etc.); radionuclide content (short, medium or long life); contact dose rate (low active, medium active). After sorting, the radioactive waste is stored in special stainless-steel containers. Organic liquid radioactive waste is stored in the service building and will be solidified to eliminate potential flammability hazards. Some solid waste is compacted with a hydraulic press to reduce the volume. The storage of solid or solidified radioactive waste is ensured for the entire period of operation of the plant in optimal safety and storage conditions. The final storage of this waste will be done only after packaging in solid, safe matrices, which will guarantee that at least 300 years will not have a negative impact on the environment. Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant spent fuel management policy is as follows: wet storage in the reactor fuel tank for a minimum of 6 years; dry storage in the dry intermediate storage for burned fuel for a period of 50 years. The dry landfill is located on the Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant site, approximately 700 m away from Unit 1, the transport being carried out on an internal road that allows the maintenance of an integrated physical protection system. The storage will be carried out in stages, finally including 27 storage modules with a capacity of 12 000 bundles / module, which will ensure the storage for 50 years of the burned fuel resulting from the operation of units 1 and 2 of Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant throughout their life. So far, 7 modules have been completed. [24]
B. Uranium supply
a) Historical and domestic uranium resources
Romania has significant uranium resources historically mined at locations such as Băița and Crucea–Botușana. The Băița deposit in Bihor County was once one of the largest surface uranium deposits globally, and Crucea–Botușana also hosted large reserves. According to IAEA reports, Romania’s recoverable uranium resources are estimated at around 6 600 tonnes at competitive costs, meaning there is domestic resource potential, though not currently widely exploited. Historically, Romania mined uranium through state-owned National Uranium Company and processed ore at the Feldioara mill. Production ceased in the 2010s as deposits depleted and mines closed.
b) Current domestic production
At present, Romania does not have significant active uranium mining output – past mines like Crucea–Botușana were closed (e.g., 2021 closure reported), and domestic production has been largely dormant. Some historical data suggests previous annual production levels around ~100 tons of uranium per year, but these figures date back and do not reflect current active mining.
c) Imported uranium for nuclear fuel
Romania imports uranium to fuel its nuclear power plants, notably the two Cernavodă CANDU reactors (which together supply about 20% of national electricity).
Key Import and Supply Partnerships:
  • Romania’s state nuclear operator Nuclearelectrica has sourced natural uranium concentrates from Kazakhstan’s Kazatomprom, the world’s largest uranium producer, under open tender contracts. These deliveries supply Romania’s nuclear fuel cycle, including processing at Feldioara;
  • Discussions are underway for a longer-term 10-year uranium supply contract between Nuclearelectrica and Kazatomprom to ensure stable deliveries into the future.
d) Processing and fuel cycle development
Romania has been developing components of an integrated nuclear fuel cycle:
  • The Feldioara Uranium Concentrate Processing Plant, owned by a subsidiary of Nuclearelectrica, has recently become operational and even won international contracts to process uranium into UO2 fuel for other countries (e.g., Argentina);
  • Nuclearelectrica’s integrated cycle aims to process imported uranium concentrates into nuclear fuel at the plant in Pitești, enhancing fuel security and adding value domestically.
e) Strategic plans for domestic production
Under Romania’s Energy Strategy 2025–2035, the government is taking steps to resume domestic uranium production:
  • Large tracts of land in Feldioara (Brașov) have been concessioned to Nuclearelectrica to restart uranium extraction and processing activities as part of national energy security planning;
  • The strategy emphasizes reducing reliance on imports and supporting an integrated nuclear fuel supply chain, potentially including exploration and mining of domestic uranium resources.
C. The complete nuclear cycle in Romania
Romania being a country with multiple and rich mineral resources, including uranium, has at this moment a unique competitive advantage in Europe, by the fact that on the territory of the country there is a complete nuclear cycle: (Table 3) [8,10,13,14]
In order for the nuclear cycle to be complete, through the 6 stages, it is mandatory that all 4 actors involved are present:
  • National Agency for Mineral Resources – which holds the uranium ore resource;
  • National Uranium Company – which exploits and processes the uranium ore resource;
  • Nuclearelectrica – which produces the nuclear fuel necessary for the production of electricity and stores radioactive waste in conditions of safety and environmental protection;
  • Center for Heavy Water Management and National Administration of State Reserves and Special Issues - which hold heavy water as a strategic state reserve.
D. Nuclear pressure tool
Definition: Anything action or inaction of an actor in the nuclear energy chain RESOURCE HOLDER (uranium ore) – RESOURCE EXPLOITER and PROCESSOR (uranium ore) – NUCLEAR FUEL MANUFACTURER – ELECTRICITY MANUFACTURER – RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORAGE – HEAVY WATER MANUFACTURER OR STORAGE, directly or indirectly related to nuclear energy resources, nuclear fuels or heavy water, to influence the behavior of other actors, to control or eliminate them, in order to achieve their own interests. (Figure 7).
The principle diagram of the use of nuclear energy resources, nuclear fuels or heavy water as a pressure tool. The pressure tool can be used throughout the chain by any of the "links" involved in this process. [8,10,13,14]

3.2.4. Mining Power System

A. Essential informations
Coal continues to be an important source of energy that can remain a safe fuel, with many countries being the only fuel available to meet the growing demand for electricity needed to raise living standards. It is very possible that this solid fuel will maintain its share of the global need for primary energy, which is transformed into electricity through its use in thermal power plants, but EU policy is to its detriment.
Romania has almost 200 years of experience in the mining industry, and the main national actors in coal mining and extraction are the following:
  • Jiu Valley Mining Basin (coal - top coal): Lonea Mining; Livezeni Mining; Vulcan Mining; Lupeni Mining;
  • Oltenia Mining Basin (lignite - lower coal): Roșia - Rovinari Mining; Jilț Mining; Motru Mining.
In Romania there are several state or private companies operating in all segments of mining operations, but the main companies are described below:
a) Jiu Valley Energy Complex
Jiu Valley Energy Complex is a state-owned company within the Ministry of Energy and has the following objects of activity: geological research for the discovery of coal reserves; production, supply and marketing of coal-fired electricity; production, dispatching, transport, distribution and supply of thermal energy.
Jiu Valley Energy Complex organized on 7 branches located in the territory: [27]
  • Coal extraction: Lonea Mining Branch; Livezeni Mining Branch; Vulcan Mining Branch; Lupeni Mining Branch; Prestserv Petroșani branch;
  • Coal-based electricity generation: Paroșeni Power Plant Branch.
Description of the Paroșeni Power Plant Branch (Hunedoara County):
The Paroșeni Thermal Power Plant, located in Paroșeni, has an installed capacity of 500 MW in 3 energy groups of 50 MW and a group of 150 MW, powered by steam boilers of 270 t / h.
The fuel used is coal from the Jiu Valley (EM Lonea, EM Livezeni, EM Vulcan, EM Lupeni), which is transported by rail. The auxiliary fuel used is natural gas.
The electricity is delivered in the National Power System in the Paroșeni power station of 110 kV and 220 kV. The amount of slag and ash discharged from the plant is stored in two warehouses, one located in Valea Căprișoara, on an area of 48 hectares and another located in the bed of the river Jiul de Vest, on an area of 10 hectares.
b) Oltenia Energy Complex
Oltenia Energy Complex is a state-owned company within the Ministry of Energy and has the following objects of activity: lignite extraction and preparation; lignite-based electricity and heat generation.
Oltenia Energy Complex is organized on 2 directions arranged in the territory: [28]
  • Mining Directorate: Roșia - Rovinari Mining; Jilț Mining; Motru Mining;
  • Energy Department: Rovinari Power Plant Branch; Turceni Power Plant Branch; Ișalnița Power Plant Branch; Craiova Power Plant Branch II.
Description of the Mining Directorate:
  • main activity: exploitation and extraction of lignite;
  • location: Gorj and Mehedinți counties;
  • year of production: 1957;
  • capabilities: 118 high-capacity mining machinery; over 220 km. conveyor belt capable of ensuring a production of 25/30 million tons of lignite / year distributed in 12 surface mining perimeters (10 mining units in the Rovinari, Motru, Jilț and Mehedinți basins);
  • total coal extracted: 1.5 billion tons;
  • estimated resources: for the next 40 years (95.4% Gorj and 4.6% Mehedinti).
Description of the Energy Directorate (installed capacity):
  • Ișalnița Power Plant: 630 MW (2 blocks of 315 MW) – operation on condensed lignite;
  • Rovinari Power Plant: 990 MW (3 blocks of 330 MW) – operation on condensed lignite;
  • Turceni Power Plant: 1320 MW (4 blocks of 330 MW) – operation on condensed lignite;
  • Craiova II Power Plant: 300 MW (2 blocks of 150 MW) – operation on lignite in cogeneration.
B. Coal supply
a) Domestic coal production:
  • Romania produces coal domestically, but production has been declining overall in recent years. In 2023 and early 2025 data show net coal output falling compared with previous periods – for example, production in the first half of 2025 was about 902,400 tonnes of oil equivalent (toe), down roughly 2.9 % year-on-year;
  • Projections from Romania’s National Commission for Strategy and Forecast (CNSP) anticipate continued decline in coal production through 2027 (to around 1.432 million toe by 2027).
b) Coal imports
  • Romania does import some coal, but import volumes have also been decreasing significantly. For example, January–June 2025 imports dropped about 60.7% compared to the prior year;
  • This reduction reflects both lower domestic demand and EU sanctions: coal imports from Russia have been banned since August 2022 under EU sanctions;
  • Projected imports continue falling – expected to drop to roughly 79,000 toe by 2027.
c) Consumption and role in energy supply
  • Coal has historically been a significant fuel for electricity and heat generation. However, coal consumption is declining as Romania transitions toward other energy sources (gas, nuclear, renewables);
  • The trend in Europe overall is toward decreasing coal use – Romania’s production and consumption reflect that broader pattern.
d) Energy transition and future outlook
  • Romania is in a transition away from coal toward cleaner energy, with investment in gas, solar, wind, and nuclear. This shift is driving down the need for coal production and imports;
  • However, Romania has also sought to delay the closure of coal-fired plants beyond planned phase-out dates (around 2026) to ensure energy security while new capacities are built.
C. The complete mining cycle in Romania
Romania currently has rich coal resources (coal and lignite), but the major advantage is that there is a complete mining cycle in the country: (Table 4) [8,10,13,14]
In order for the mining cycle to be complete, through the 3 stages , it is mandatory that all the 3 actors involved are present, namely:
  • National Agency for Mineral Resources – which owns the coal resource (coal and lignite);
  • Jiu Valley Energy Complex – which exploits, prepares, transports and produces electricity based on coal;
  • Oltenia Energy Complex – which exploits, prepares, transports and produces lignite-based electricity.
D. Mining pressure tool
Definition: Anything action or inaction of an actor in the mining energy chain RESOURCE HOLDER (coal / lignite coal) - EXPLOITER / PREPARATOR / RESOURCE TRANSPORTER (coal / lignite coal) - ELECTRICITY MANUFACTURER (coal / lignite based), directly or indirectly linked to the purpose of coal or lignite resources to influence the behavior of other actors, to control or eliminate them, in order to achieve their own interests. (Figure 8)
The pressure tool can be used throughout the chain by any of the "links" involved in this process. [8,10,13,14]

3.2.5. National Power System

A. Essential informations
Electricity is the most important source of energy in the world without which a country's economy cannot function. All the operating systems in a country's economy ( food system, transportation system, health system, financial system, water supply system, commercial system, administrative system, communications-information system ) are dependent on electricity, as it turns out. In Romania, the entire energy chain, from production, transmission, distribution and supply of electricity to consumers, is characterized by the National Power System – NPS.
The NPS includes the following infrastructures (elements): [29]
  • power generators – hydrogenerators, thermogenerators, atomogenerators, wind generators, photovoltaic installations, etc.), which produce electricity and are located in power plants;
  • power transformers (power autotransformers) – which transform voltage and are in power stations;
  • transport power grid – which transport electricity;
  • distribution power grid – that distributes electricity.
The purpose of the NPS is to ensure all security, technical and economic conditions for the supply of electricity to consumers.
To meet this goal, NPS must meet the following requirements:
  • safety (security) in the supply of consumers (the level of safety is predetermined at the request of the consumer according to its technical characteristics);
  • electricity quality (the evaluation of the quality of electricity is done through the values of the quality indices, which must be within the limits set by regulations and / or requested by consumers);
  • the economy (to operate in economic conditions);
  • external requirements (environment and other external factors).
NPS interconnection is one of the main ways to increase its reliability and security without affecting energy independence. These interconnections provide emergency assistance without the need to install and maintain a significant power reserve.
International interconnections of the Romanian Power System (Table 5). [29]
The main actors present in the energy chain are the following:
  • Electricity generation: Hidroelectrica; Nuclearelectrica; Romgaz; OMV Petrom; Oltenia Energy Complex; Jiu Valley Energy Complex; Renewable Energy Sources (RES) Power Plants;
  • Electricity transport: Transelectrica;
  • Electricity distribution: distribution operators;
  • Electricity supply: supply operators.
NPS has the following structure, Figure 9:
  • Elements for power generation;
  • Power substations;
  • Power networks (grid);
  • Power consumers.
SG - synchronous generator (hydro, thermal, nuclear), wind and photovoltaic installations;
UHV – ultra high voltage – 400 kV – 750 kV;
VHV – very high voltage – 220 kV – 400 kV;
HV – high voltage – 35 kV – 110 kV;
MV – medium voltage – 6 kV – 35 kV;
LV – low voltage – 1 kV – 0,4 kV;
T – power transformer;
AT – power autotransformer.
a) Power Plants
In Romania there are several state or private companies operating in generation electricity operations, but the main companies are described in Table 6:
b) Transelectrica
In Romania, the electricity transmission activity is carried out through the Transelectrica company, which is also the system operator. The activity of electricity transmission is carried out through the National Power Grid (NPG), consisting of power stations and overhead power lines (OHL). NPG is the electricity network of national and strategic interest with a nominal line voltage 220 kV and 400 kV.
Functions of Transelectrica: [29]
  • transmission and system operator of the National Power System, by (Figure 10):
  • 81 power substations (220 kV, 400 kV and 750 kV): 400/220/110 kV Bucharest South; 400/110 kV Domnești; 400/220/110 kV Iernut; 400/220/110 kV Sibiu South; 400/110 kV Dârste; 400/110 kV Brașov; 400/220/110 kV Gutinaș; 400/220/110 kV Suceava; 400/110 kV Bacău South; 400/110 kV Roman North; 400 kV Isaccea (Republic of Moldova); 400 kV Stupina (Bulgaria); 400 kV Rahman (Bulgaria); 400/220/110 kV Lacu Sărat; 400 kV Cernavoda; 400/110 kV Medgidia South; 400/110 kV Constanța North; 400/110 kV Tariverde; 400/110 kV Tulcea West; 400/110 kV Smârdan; 400 kV Ţânţăreni (Bulgaria); 400 kV Porțile de Fier (Serbia); 400/220/110 kV Urecheşti; 400/220 kV Slatina; 400/110 kV Drăgăneşti-Olt; 400/220/110 kV Brazi West; 400/220/110 kV Bradu; 400/110 kV Gura Ialomiței; 400/110 kV Pelican; 400/220/110 kV Arad (Hungary); 400 kV Nădab (Hungary); 400/220/110 kV Mintia; 400/220 kV Roșiori (Ukraine); 400 kV Gădălin; 400/110 kV Cluj East; 400/110 kV Oradea Sud; 220/110 kV Fundeni; 220/110 kV Gheorgheni; 220/110 kV Fântânele; 220/110 kV Ungheni; 220/110 kV Alba Iulia; 220/110 kV Munteni; 220/110 kV Iași (FAI); 220/110 kV Dumbrava; 220/110 kV Stejaru; 220/110 kV Filești; 220/110 kV Bărboși; 220/110 kV Focșani West; 220/110 kV Stâlpu; 220/110 kV Teleajen; 220/110 kV Mostiștea; 220/110 kV Turnu Măgurele; 220/110 kV Ghizdaru; 220/110 kV Târgoviște; 220/110 kV Pitești Sud; 220/110 kV Arefu; 220/110 kV Stupărei; 220/110 kV Târgu-Jiu North; 220/110 kV Sărdăneşti; 220/110 kV Turnu Severin; 220/110 kV Cetate; 220/110 kV Calafat; 220/110 kV Gradient; 220/110 kV Craiova North; 220/110 kV Râureni; 220/110 kV Resita (Serbia); 220/110 kV Calea Aradului; 220/110 kV Săcălaz; 220/110 kV Timişoara; 220/110 kV Iaz; 220/110 kV Pestiș; 220/110 kV Hăşdat; 220/110 kV Baru Mare; 220/110 kV Paroşeni; 220/110 kV Câmpia Turzii; 220/110 kV Cluj Floresti; 220/110 kV Tihău; 220/110 kV Sălaj; 220/110 kV Baia Mare 3; 220/110 kV Vetiș;
  • 8 931,6 km. overhead power lines (OHL): 400 kV Bucharest South – Domnești; 400 kV Bucharest South – Gura Ialomiței; 400 kV Bucharest South – Pelicanu; 400 kV Bucharest South – Slatina; 400 kV Domnești – Brazi Vest; 220 kV Bucharest South – Fundeni; 220 kV Bucharest South – Ghizdaru; 220 kV Bucharest South – Mostiștea; 220 kV Fundeni – Brazi West; 400 kV Iernut – Gădălin; 400 kV Iernut – Sibiu South; 400 kV Sibiu South – Mintia; 400 kV Sibiu South – Țânțăreni; 400 kV Sibiu South – Brașov; 400 kV Brașov – Bradu; 400 kV Brașov – Dârste; 400 kV Brașov – Gutinaș; 400 kV Dârste – Brazi West; 220 kV Gheorgheni – CHE Stejaru; 220 kV Gheorgheni – Fântânele; 220 kV Fântânele – Ungheni; 220 kV Ungheni – Iernut; 220 kV Iernut – Baia Mare 3; 220 kV Iernut – Câmpia Turzii; 220 kV South Sibiu – CHE Lotru; 220 kV Alba Iulia – Mintia; 220 kV Alba Iulia – CHE Șugag; 220 kV Alba Iulia – CHE Gâlceag; 220 kV Alba Iulia – Cluj Floresti; 400 kV Gutinaș – Brașov; 400 kV Gutinaș – Bacău South; 400 kV Bacău South – Roman North; 400 kV Roman North – Suceava; 220 kV Gutinaș – Dumbrava; 220 kV Gutinaș – CTE Borzești; 220 kV Gutinaș – Munteni; 220 kV Gutinaș – Iași (FAI); 220 kV Iași (FAI) – Munteni; 220 kV Iași (FAI) – Suceava; 220 kV Dumbrava – CHE Stejaru; 220 kV CHE Stejaru – Gheorgheni; 400 kV Rahman – Dobrudja (Bulgaria); 400 kV Stupina – Varna (Bulgaria); 400 kV Isaccea – Vulcănești (Republic of Moldova); 750 kV Isaccea – Southern Ukraine (Ukraine) - decommissioned line; 400 kV Smârdan – Gutinaș; 400 kV Smârdan – Lacu Sărat; 400 kV Smârdan – Isaccea; 400 kV Lacu Sărat – Gura Ialomiței; 400 kV Lacu Sărat – Isaccea; 400 kV Isaccea – Tulcea West; 400 kV Isaccea – Rahman; 400 kV Isaccea – Stupina; 400 kV Tulcea West – Tariverde; 400 kV Tariverde – Constanța North; 400 kV Constanța North – Cernavoda; 400 kV Cernavoda – Medgidia South; 400 kV Cernavoda – Pelicanu; 400 kV Cernavoda – Gura Ialomiței; 400 kV Lacu Sărat – CTE Brăila; 220 kV Focșani West – Gutinaș; 220 kV Focșani West – Bărboși; 220 kV Bărboși – Filești; 220 kV Lacu Sărat – CTE Brăila; 400 kV Brazi West – Dârste; 400 kV Brazi West – CTE Petrom Brazi; 400 kV Brazi West – Domnești; 400 kV Bradu – Brașov; 400 kV Bradu – Țânțăreni; 400 kV Gura Ialomiței – Lacu Sărac; 400 kV Gura Ialomiței – Cernavoda; 400 kV Gura Ialomiței – Bucharest South; 400 kV Pelicanu – Cernavoda; 400 kV Pelicanu – Bucharest South; 220 kV Teleajen – Brazi West; 220 kV Teleajen – Stâlpu; 220 kV Mostiștea – Bucharest South; 220 kV Turnu Măgurele – Ghizdaru; 220 kV Turnu Măgurele – Craiova North; 220 kV Ghizdaru – Bucharest South; 220 kV Târgoviște – Brazi West; 220 kV Târgoviște – Bradu; 220 kV Pitești South – Bradu; 220 kV Arefu – CHE Vidraru; 220 kV Arefu – Râureni; 220 kV Bradu – Stupărei; 400 kV Porțile de Fier – Djerdap (Serbia); 400 kV Țânțăreni – Kosloduy (Bulgaria); 400 kV Urechești – Porțile de Fier; 400 kV Urechești – Domnești; 400 kV Urechești – Țânțăreni; 400 kV Urechești – CTE Rovinari; 400 kV Porțile de Fier – Slatina; 400 kV Țânțăreni – Bradu; 400 kV Țânțăreni – Slatina; 400 kV Țânțăreni – CTE Turceni; 400 kV Slatina – Bucharest South; 400 kV Slatina – Drăgănești Olt; 220 kV Urechești – Târgu Jiu North; 220 kV Urechești – Sărdănești; 220 kV Sărdănești – Craiova North; 220 kV Craiova North – Slatina; 220 kV Craiova Nord – Turnu Măgurele; 220 kV CTE Ișalnița – Grădiște; 220 kV Grădiște – Slatina; 220 kV Porțile de Fier – Resița; 220 kV Porțile de Fier – Turnu Severin; 220 kV Porțile de Fier – Cetate; 220 kV Cetate – Calafat; 220 kV Râureni – Arefu; 220 kV Râureni – Stupărei; 220 kV Stupărei – Bradu; 220 kV Craiova North – CTE Ișalnița; 220 kV CHE Lotru – Sibiu South; 400 kV Nădab – Bekecsaba (Hungary); 400 kV Arad – Sandorfalva (Hungary); 400 kV Resita – Pancevo (Serbia); 400 kV Nădab – Arad; 400 kV Arad – Mintia; 400 kV Mintia – Sibiu South; 220 kV Arad – Calea Aradului; 220 kV Arad – Timișoara; 220 kV Calea Aradului – Săcălaz; 220 kV Săcălaz – Timișoara; 220 kV Timișoara – Mintia; 220 kV Timișoara – Reșița; 220 kV Resita – Iaz; 220 kV Resita – Porțile de Fier; 220 kV Mintia – Pestiș; 220 kV Mintia – Hășdat; 220 kV Mintia – Alba Iulia; 220 kV Hășdat – Pestiș; 220 kV Hășdat – CHE Retezat; 220 kV Hășdat – Baru Mare; 220 kV Baru Mare – Paroșeni; 220 kV Paroșeni – Târgu Jiu North; 400 kV Roșiori – Mukacevo (Ukraine); 400 kV Roșiori – Oradea South; 400 kV Roșiori – Gădălin; 400 kV Gădălin – Cluj East; 400 kV Gădălin – Iernut; 220 kV Roșiori – Vetiș; 220 kV Roșiori – Baia Mare 3; 220 kV Baia Mare 3 – Tihău; 220 kV Baia Mare 3 – Iernut; 220 kV Tihău – Sălaj; 220 kV Tihău – Cluj Floresti; 220 kV Cluj Floresti – CHE Mărișelu; 220 kV Cluj Floresti – Turzii Plain; 220 kV Cluj Floresti – Alba Iulia; 220 kV Câmpia Turzii – Iernut;
  • 218 transformation units totaling 37 794 MVA;
  • dispatching infrastructure (EMS / SCADA - Energy Management / Surveillance-Control and Data Acquisition System) which is carried out within the Operational Unit - National Energy Dispatcher (DEN) and the 5 Territorial Dispatchers (DET);
  • capacity allocation on interconnection power lines;
  • green certificates;
  • balancing market operator – OPE: balancing market platform;
  • commercial operator of the electricity market - OPCOM: trading platforms and green certificate trading platform;
  • wholesale electricity market operator - OMEPA: metering system;
  • telecommunications and IT operator – TELETRANS: fiber optics, digital telecom system.
Figure 10. National Power System.
Figure 10. National Power System.
Preprints 193635 g010
c) Electricity distribution operators
Electricity companies operating in Romania: Distribuţie Energie Electrică România, Rețele Electrice România, DelGaz Grid și Distribuție Oltenia.
d) Electricity Supply Operators
Electricity companies operating in Romania: A6 Impex S.R.L.; Alegfurnizorul Consulting S.R.L.; Alro S.A.; Anchor Grup S.A.; Axpo Energy Romania S.R.L.; CEZ Vânzare S.A.; Cooperativadeenergie Furnizare S.R.L.; Cotroceni Park S.A.; Crest Energy S.R.L.; Dacia Energy Solutions S.R.L.; E.ON Energie Romania S.A.; ENEL Energie S.A.; ENEL Energie Muntenia S.A.; Electrica Furnizare S.A.; BEPCO; CE Oltenia S.A.; CET Arad; CET Govora S.A.; Nova Power & Gas S.R.L.; MET Energy România; EM Power S.R.L.; Transenergo Com; Engie România; Getica 95 Com; MVM Future Energy Technology; OMV Petrom (energie); Energy Tech Entera; PPC Energie; Alive Capital; EVA Energy.
B. Electricity supply
a) Overview of Romania’s electricity system
Romania’s electricity supply comes from a diversified mix of domestic production and imports. The system includes a range of generation sources – fossil fuels, nuclear, hydropower, and renewables – and is connected to the European power grid, allowing exports and imports.
b) Electricity generation (domestic production)
Main Sources of Electricity: Romania’s electricity generation mix includes:
  • Nuclear power: Cernavodă Nuclear Power Plant is a key low-carbon source; Nuclear generation increased modestly in recent reports;
  • Thermal (coal and gas): Historically significant but declining, especially coal due to EU phase-out pressures; Gas and coal plants still contribute a major share of production;
  • Hydropower: Important renewable source, but production has dropped due to lower water flows;
  • Wind and Solar: Solar generation has seen strong growth, particularly from small and prosumer installations; Wind output has been more volatile but still part of the mix;
Recent Production Trends:
  • In 2025, total available electricity was reported at ~57.2 TWh, up slightly versus the previous year;
  • Hydro and wind output declined, while nuclear and solar grew (solar up ~35%).
c) Electricity Imports and Exports
Romania is part of the integrated European electricity market:
  • Imports have increased significantly in 2025 due to falling domestic production (especially hydro), with imports rising 40–67% in various reporting periods;
  • Exports also continue, as Romania trades power with neighbors depending on price and system balance.
This highlights Romania’s role both as a buyer and seller on the regional energy market, balancing domestic supply with cross-border flows.
d) Consumption Patterns
  • Romanian electricity consumption in 2022 included ~13.5 TWh for households and ~36.7 TWh for businesses;
  • In 2025, consumption remained robust with slight shifts: population demand up, but industrial use generally flat or slightly down in some reports.
e) Recent Developments & Challenges
Rising Imports: Multiple 2025 reports show imports rising sharply as domestic generation fluctuates, particularly due to:
  • Lower hydro and wind output;
  • Balancing grid demand with international markets
→ this has increased dependency on neighboring countries for short-term supply;
  • Renewables & Transition: Solar power has been one of the fastest-growing segments, while the country works to reduce coal dependency and align with EU climate goals;
  • Grid Integration: Romania actively participates in EU energy markets, trading electricity based on real-time supply and demand across borders.
C. The complete power cycle in Romania
Romania having a mix of energy resources (oil, natural gas, coal, uranium ore, etc.), has the major advantage of having a complete power cycle: (Table 7) [8,10,13,14]
In order for the power cycle to be complete, through the 5 stages , it is mandatory that all the actors involved are present, namely:
  • National Agency for Mineral Resources - which owns energy resources (oil, natural gas, coal, uranium ore);
  • Jiu Valley Energy Complex - which produces coal-based electricity;
  • Oltenia Energy Complex - which produces electricity based on lignite;
  • Nuclearelectrica - which produces uranium-based electricity;
  • Hidroelectrica - which produces water-based electricity;
  • Romgaz / OMV Petrom - which produces electricity based on natural gas;
  • Distribuţie Energie Electrică România, Rețele Electrice România, DelGaz Grid și Distribuție Oltenia and Supply operators – which distributes and supplies electricity to consumers.
D. Power pressure tool
Definition: Anything action or inaction of a power chain actor RESOURCE HOLDER (oil / natural gas / coal / uranium / water) – ELECTRICITY MANUFACTURER (natural gas / uranium / coal / water based) – ELECTRICITY CONVEYOR – ENERGY DISTRIBUTOR ELECTRICITY, directly or indirectly related to energy resources or electricity, which has the purpose to influence the behavior of other actors, to control or eliminate them, in order to achieve their own interests (Figure 11).
The pressure tool can be used throughout the chain by any of the "links" involved in this process. [8,10,13,14]

3.3. Soft Power Analysis

3.3.1. The National Oil System – International Relations

a) Historical context of the Romanian Oil System
  • Romania has one of Europe’s oldest oil industries, dating back to the mid-19th century;
  • The Ploiești oil fields were particularly significant. By World War I and II, Romania was a major oil exporter to Germany and the Allies;
  • During World War II, Romanian oil was crucial to the Axis powers, making it a strategic target for Allied bombing campaigns.
Key takeaway: Oil shaped Romania’s international alliances and made it a strategic asset in global conflicts.
b) Post-War and communist era (1945–1989)
  • Under communist rule, Romania’s oil industry was nationalized and became a tool for state-led economic planning;
  • Oil exports were directed mainly to Soviet bloc countries, though Romania maintained some trade with Western Europe, especially in the 1970s–1980s;
  • Oil revenues funded industrialization, but Romania’s reliance on foreign technology and equipment led to strategic vulnerabilities.
c) Post-communist era and global integration (1990–present)
  • Romania transitioned to a market economy, privatizing parts of its oil sector (e.g., Petrom in the 1990s, later acquired by OMV, Austria’s energy giant, in 2004);
  • Modern Romania is integrated into European energy markets, with pipelines connecting it to Central and Eastern Europe;
  • Romania is also a participant in European Union energy policy, which includes: diversification of supply, energy security measures and reducing dependence on Russian oil and gas
d) International relations of National Oil System
European Relations:
  • EU Member State: Romania exports oil and refined products to EU countries, and is involved in strategic projects like Nabucco and other pipeline initiatives;
  • Energy security: Romania is viewed as a potential alternative route for oil and gas to reduce dependency on Russian energy.
Relations with Russia:
  • Historically complex: Romania depended on Russian imports of oil products, but political tensions and EU policies have limited direct cooperation;
  • Romania’s oil infrastructure (refineries and ports) makes it strategically important in the Black Sea region.
Relations with the U.S. and NATO:
  • Romania has partnered with the U.S. and NATO on energy security and protecting pipelines;
  • Romanian oil has sometimes been part of strategic petroleum reserves discussions in NATO.
Global Oil Market:
  • Romania produces around 0.1–0.2% of global oil (modest but regionally significant);
  • It trades with neighboring countries (Hungary, Bulgaria, Serbia) and exports refined products globally.
e) Strategic importance
  • Location: Near the Black Sea, serving as a hub for oil transit between East and West;
  • Refining capacity: Ploiești and other refineries supply Central and Southeastern Europe;
  • Energy security: Romania’s domestic production reduces EU reliance on imports and provides leverage in international energy diplomacy.
Romania’s oil system isn’t just an economic resource – it’s a geopolitical tool, shaping the country’s alliances, security policies, and role in Europe. [2,5]

3.3.2. The National Gas System – International Relations

a) Overview of the Romanian Gas System
Romania has a unique position in Europe regarding natural gas:
  • Domestic production: Romania is one of the largest natural gas producers in the EU, mainly from the Transylvanian Basin and the Black Sea offshore fields;
  • Consumption vs. production: Romania produces enough gas to meet a significant portion of domestic demand, but still imports gas during peak consumption periods;
  • Infrastructure: Includes a network of pipelines, storage facilities, and interconnections with neighboring countries like Hungary, Bulgaria, and Ukraine.
b) Key players and stakeholders
  • Domestic: Romgaz and OMV Petrom are the largest producers; Transgaz manages the national transmission system;
  • International: Russia has historically been a major supplier through pipelines like Trans-Balkan and TurkStream; EU countries (Hungary, Bulgaria, Austria) interact with Romania via gas interconnections; The U.S. and other LNG suppliers influence diversification strategies.
c) Romania in European gas security
Romania plays a strategic role in European energy security:
  • Diversification hub: Its infrastructure could serve as a transit corridor for gas from the Black Sea, Azerbaijan, or LNG imports;
  • Integration with EU energy markets: Romania is part of the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO-G), which coordinates cross-border gas flows;
  • Storage capacity: Romania has significant underground storage (e.g., in Sărmășel and Bilciurești) to stabilize regional supply.
d) Integration into the European Gas System
Romania is fully integrated into the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO-G). Through this integration, Figure 12: [30]
  • Romania participates in the EU internal gas market;
  • Cross-border gas trading is facilitated via market coupling mechanisms;
  • System operation follows EU standards for reliability, transparency, and sustainability.
The national transmission system operator, Transgaz, plays a central role in coordinating Romania’s power grid with neighboring countries.
e) Cross-Border interconnections
Romania maintains gas interconnections with: [30]
  • Hungary, by gas pipeline: Arad – Csanadpalota;
  • Republic of Moldova, by gas pipeline: Iasi – Ungheni;
  • Bulgaria, by gas pipeline: Giurgiu – Ruse, Negru Vodă – Kardam 1, 2, 3;
  • Ukraine, by gas pipeline: Medieșu Aurit – Tekovo, Isaccea – Orlovka 1, 2, 3.
These interconnections enhance:
  • Security of supply;
  • Gas network stability during peak demand or outages;
  • Regional energy solidarity.
f) Geopolitical considerations
  • Russia–EU relations: Romania’s gas system has historically depended on Russian gas, but recent geopolitical tensions push Romania toward diversification;
  • Black Sea gas: The discovery of offshore reserves (Neptun Deep) could enhance Romania’s energy independence and export potential, shifting regional dynamics;
  • Transit potential: Romania could act as a gateway for gas from Azerbaijan (via the Southern Gas Corridor) or LNG imports into Central and Southeastern Europe.
g) International cooperation & agreements
  • EU directives: Compliance with the Third Energy Package, promoting competition and network unbundling;
  • Interconnection projects: BRUA Pipeline (Bulgaria-Romania-Hungary-Austria), enhancing access to Central Europe; Romania-Hungary interconnector, facilitating gas flows between the two countries;
  • Regional alliances: Collaboration with Black Sea countries to develop offshore resources.
h) Challenges and opportunities
Challenges:
  • Modernization of infrastructure to meet EU standards;
  • Political and regulatory uncertainty affecting foreign investment;
  • Geopolitical pressures from Russia and energy market volatility.
Opportunities:
  • Export potential from Black Sea gas;
  • Becoming a regional hub for diversified gas supply;
  • Increasing renewable and hydrogen integration in line with EU Green Deal policies.
Romania’s gas system is both a domestic energy backbone and a critical element in European energy security. Its strategic location, production capacity, and interconnections make it a key player in regional geopolitics, balancing between Russian influence, EU energy policies, and emerging offshore resources. [2,5]

3.3.3. The National Nuclear System – International Relations

a) Overview of the Romanian Nuclear System
Romania’s nuclear program is relatively small but strategically important. Key components:
  • Cernavodă Nuclear Power Plants: Only operational nuclear facility in Romania; Uses CANDU 6 reactors (Canadian Deuterium Uranium technology) – heavy water reactors; Current status: 2 reactors operational, 2 more planned or under consideration; Accounts for roughly 20% of Romania’s electricity;
  • Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Romania has limited domestic uranium resources, but most fuel is imported; Heavy-water technology allows for on-site refueling without needing enriched uranium;
  • Regulatory Bodies: National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control: nuclear safety, licensing; Romanian Atomic Forum: Industry promotion and international cooperation.
b) International relations & nuclear policy
Romania’s nuclear policy is shaped by energy security, non-proliferation, and EU integration. Key aspects:
  • International Treaties & Agreements: Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) – Romania is a non-nuclear-weapon state under the NPT; IAEA Safeguards – Romania adheres to inspections and reporting; Convention on Nuclear Safety – Ensures adherence to international nuclear safety standards; EURATOM Treaty – As an EU member, Romania participates in EU nuclear cooperation and regulation frameworks;
  • Cooperation with Other Countries: Canada: CANDU reactor technology; ongoing collaboration for maintenance, upgrades, and fuel supply; France & USA: Technical support, safety upgrades, potential partnerships in future reactor development; Russia: Historically for reactor parts and fuel but reduced due to geopolitical concerns; European Union: Funding and regulatory oversight for nuclear safety and expansion projects.
  • Nuclear Energy & EU Strategy: EU encourages member states to diversify energy sources while reducing carbon emissions; Romania’s nuclear expansion is aligned with EU climate and energy security goals, including reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
c) Geopolitical implications
  • Energy Security: Nuclear energy reduces Romania’s dependence on imported natural gas, particularly from Russia; Expanding nuclear capacity is seen as a strategic move for energy independence;
  • Regional Influence: Romania’s nuclear program, though not militarized, increases its strategic value in Eastern Europe; Potential collaboration with neighbors (Bulgaria, Hungary) on grid integration and energy trade;
  • Non-Proliferation Role: Romania supports international non-proliferation norms; Heavy water reactors raise some proliferation concerns globally (plutonium potential), but Romania remains under strict IAEA supervision.
d) Future Outlook
  • Cernavodă Units 3 & 4; Planned expansion could double nuclear output; Involves international partners (Canada, EU, potential US investment);
  • Green Energy Transition: Nuclear power is central to Romania’s decarbonization strategy; Balancing nuclear with wind, solar, and hydro energy is key;
  • International Partnerships: Further cooperation with NATO and EU in nuclear safety and emergency preparedness; Potential research in small modular reactors (SMRs) as part of innovation and export potential.
Romania’s nuclear system is small but strategically significant, contributing to energy independence and climate goals. Internationally, Romania positions itself as a responsible nuclear actor, adhering to non-proliferation treaties, collaborating with Canada, the EU, and other allies, and cautiously reducing reliance on Russian technology and fuel. Its future lies in expansion, EU alignment, and technological modernization. [2,5]

3.3.4. The National Mining System – International Relations

a) Historical context of Romanian coal mining:
  • Industrial backbone: Coal mining has been central to Romania’s industrial development, especially during the 19th and 20th centuries. The Jiu Valley in Transylvania and Oltenia regions were the main coal-producing areas;
  • Social and political significance: Coal miners played a key role in Romania’s economy and politics, notably during the communist era. The mines were heavily state-subsidized, making Romania largely self-sufficient in energy production;
  • Post-communist transition: After 1989, many coal mines became economically unviable due to inefficiency and competition from imported coal. Romania began privatization and restructuring, impacting international trade relations.
b) Romania’s coal in international trade:
  • Exports: Historically, Romania exported coal to neighboring countries (Hungary, Bulgaria, and former Yugoslav states) and some Western European markets;
  • Imports: Modern Romania imports high-quality coal and coking coal for steel production from countries like Russia, Poland, and Australia;
  • EU integration: Romania’s membership in the European Union (since 2007) affected coal trade: EU regulations on emissions, energy efficiency, and competition required Romania to adapt its mining sector.
c) International relations and energy policy:
  • EU climate policies: Romania is part of the EU’s Green Deal, which promotes phasing out coal by 2030–2040; This has geopolitical implications because reducing coal reliance shifts Romania toward imports of gas or renewables, affecting relationships with energy exporters (e.g., Russia);
  • Regional cooperation: Romania participates in Central and Eastern European energy networks, sharing technology, expertise, and sometimes coal supplies;
  • Foreign investment: International companies (from Germany, Austria, and China) have been involved in modernizing Romanian mining equipment or energy infrastructure, linking Romania to global supply chains.
d) Geopolitical implications:
  • Energy security: Coal was once a pillar of Romanian energy independence. Reducing coal dependence increases Romania’s reliance on natural gas, which has international security implications, particularly with Russia;
  • Environmental diplomacy: Romania must balance EU pressure to cut coal usage with domestic economic interests in mining regions, sometimes causing friction in EU-level negotiations;
  • Strategic positioning: Romania’s coal resources, while shrinking in global importance, remain part of its transition narrative, helping secure EU funding for clean energy and infrastructure projects.
e) Challenges and international cooperation:
  • Economic viability: Most coal mines are not profitable without EU subsidies. International investors and EU funds support retraining workers and transitioning mines to renewable energy projects;
  • Cross-border projects: Romania participates in energy grid integration projects with Hungary, Bulgaria, and Ukraine, partially motivated by the decline in domestic coal use;
  • Research collaboration: Romanian universities and mining institutes collaborate internationally on cleaner mining technologies and carbon capture initiatives.
Romania’s coal mining system has shifted from a domestic industrial cornerstone to a strategic but declining energy sector influenced heavily by international relations. EU climate policies, regional cooperation, foreign investment, and energy security concerns shape Romania’s current and future coal strategy. Coal is no longer just an economic resource; it’s a diplomatic and geopolitical factor in energy and environmental policy. [2,5]

3.3.5. The National Power System – International Relations

a) Strategic position of Romania in the Regional Power System
Romania holds a strategically important position in Southeast and Central-Eastern Europe, acting as an energy bridge between the Balkans, the Black Sea region, and the European Union. Its geographic location allows Romania to participate actively in regional electricity markets and cross-border energy exchanges.
b) Integration into the European Power System
Romania is fully integrated into the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E). Through this integration, Figure 13: [31]
  • Romania participates in the EU internal electricity market;
  • Cross-border electricity trading is facilitated via market coupling mechanisms;
  • System operation follows EU standards for reliability, transparency, and sustainability.
The national transmission system operator, Transelectrica, plays a central role in coordinating Romania’s power grid with neighboring countries.
c) Cross-Border interconnections
Romania maintains electricity interconnections with: [31]
  • Hungary, by 400 kV OHL: Nadab – Bekescsaba and Arad – Sandorfalva OHL;
  • Bulgaria, by 400 kV OHL: Țânțăreni – Kosloduy, Rahman – Dobrudja and Stupina – Varna;
  • Serbia, by 400 kV OHL: Resita – Pancevo 2 and Porțile de Fier – Djerdap;
  • Ukraine, by 400 kV OHL: Roșiori – Mukacevo and Isaccea – Southern Ukraine (cancelled);
  • Republic of Moldova, by 400 kV OHL: Isaccea – Vulcanesti.
These interconnections enhance:
  • Security of supply;
  • Grid stability during peak demand or outages;
  • Regional energy solidarity.
Romania is also involved in projects aimed at strengthening Black Sea and Balkan interconnection capacity.
d) Energy security and geopolitical relations
Romania’s power system contributes significantly to national and regional energy security due to:
  • A diversified energy mix (hydro, nuclear, fossil fuels, renewables);
  • Domestic electricity generation capacity;
  • Reduced dependency on external electricity imports.
At the international level, Romania supports EU policies aimed at decreasing dependence on politically sensitive energy sources, particularly in the context of Eastern European geopolitics.
e) Nuclear energy and international cooperation
Romania operates the Cernavodă Nuclear Power Plant, using CANDU 6 technology, which involves international partnerships, particularly with:
  • Canada;
  • EU institutions;
  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Future nuclear expansion projects are closely linked to international financing, technology transfer, and regulatory cooperation.
f) Renewable energy and EU climate commitments
Romania’s international power relations are increasingly shaped by:
  • EU climate and energy targets;
  • Cross-border renewable integration;
  • Participation in regional balancing and ancillary services markets.
Wind and solar power development, especially in Dobrogea, has regional implications for grid stability and international power flows.
g) Role in regional energy initiatives
Romania actively participates in:
  • The Energy Community;
  • Regional electricity market integration initiatives in Southeast Europe;
  • EU-funded infrastructure projects (PCI – Projects of Common Interest).
These initiatives strengthen Romania’s role as a reliable partner in regional power system development.
h) Challenges and future perspectives
Key international challenges include:
  • Grid modernization to accommodate renewables;
  • Managing cross-border congestion;
  • Aligning national policies with evolving EU regulations.
In the future, Romania is expected to enhance its role as a regional electricity exporter and stability provider within the European power system. [2,5]

4. Diplomacy and Energy Policy – An Integral Part of the Security of Energy Communities

Energy represents one of the fundamental pillars of the economic and social development of any community. In a globalized world, energy resources are no longer merely a domestic concern, but a strategic instrument in international relations. Energy diplomacy and energy policy thus become essential components of the security of energy communities, defining how states or groups of states access, distribute, and protect energy resources. Energy security does not only refer to the availability of resources, but also to price stability, the protection of critical infrastructure, and the diversification of energy sources. Diplomacy and energy policy are interconnected, as domestic political decisions influence external relations and vice versa. [2,5,8,13,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]
A. Energy Diplomacy – Concept and importance
Energy diplomacy is the process through which states use diplomatic tools to secure their interests in the energy sector. This includes bilateral and multilateral negotiations, the creation of strategic alliances, participation in international organizations, and the promotion of innovative energy technologies.
Main roles:
  • Ensuring access to resources – negotiating contracts for the import or export of natural gas, oil, nuclear energy, or renewable sources;
  • Energy market stability – cooperation between states to prevent energy crises and avoid extreme price fluctuations;
  • Geopolitical influence – energy becomes a tool of power in international relations, affecting alliances and the strategic position of states.
Recent examples include the role of the European Union in negotiating natural gas supplies in the context of regional crises, as well as the involvement of China and Russia in global energy infrastructure.
B. Energy Policy – an instrument of community security
Energy policy defines how a state or community manages its energy resources to ensure sustainability, independence, and resilience. It includes:
  • Diversification of energy sources – to reduce dependence on a single supplier or type of resource;
  • Promotion of renewable and efficient energy – to reduce vulnerabilities and environmental impact;
  • Strategic infrastructure planning – transport, storage, and distribution networks designed to withstand economic or political shocks.
A coherent energy policy contributes to the safety and security of energy communities by preventing crises and ensuring the continuity of essential services.
C. The interdependence between diplomacy and energy policy
Diplomacy and energy policy cannot be considered separately, as domestic decisions have external effects and vice versa. This interdependence manifests itself through:
  • International agreements – such as energy cooperation treaties, which provide both stability and predictability for investments;
  • Response to energy crises – coordination between states to prevent shortages or manage emergency situations;
  • Regional integration – energy communities like those in the EU or ASEAN optimize their resources through diplomatic cooperation and joint strategies.
Thus, energy security becomes a product of diplomatic action and strategic planning.
D. Challenges and perspectives
Even though diplomacy and energy policy contribute to the security of communities, they face significant challenges:
  • Geopolitical tensions – conflicts between states can affect energy supply;
  • Dependence on external resources – vulnerability to price fluctuations or embargoes;
  • Energy transition – the shift to renewable sources requires investment and international coordination.
In the long term, solutions lie in strengthening regional cooperation, promoting energy independence, and developing green technologies.
Diplomacy and energy policy are indispensable pillars of the security of energy communities. They ensure not only the continuity of supply but also economic stability, social cohesion, and the geopolitical influence of states. In an era of global interdependencies and energy transition, the strategic integration of these two dimensions becomes essential for a sustainable and secure future. [2,5,8,13,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]

5. Development and Implementation of the Energy Security Strategy at Community, National and Regional Level

Table 8. presents the development of the energy security strategy (at the community, national, and regional levels).
Cross-cutting instruments at all levels:
  • Strict legislation and regulations on energy safety and security;
  • Establishment of strategic funds for investments and emergency situations;
  • Education and awareness programs on energy efficiency;
  • Research and innovation for sustainable and resilient technologies.
Table 9 shows the strategic directions and concrete actions regarding the implementation of the energy security strategy.

6. Conclusions

This study has demonstrated that achieving stability in contemporary energy communities – spanning oil, gas, nuclear, mining, and electricity sectors – requires an integrated analytical framework that combines both hard (technical, quantitative, and infrastructural) and soft (international relations, diplomacy and energy policy) dimensions. The concept of "Smart Energy Power" advanced in this work emphasizes that system resilience and long-term stability cannot be ensured through technological optimization alone, but rather through the coordinated interaction of engineering reliability, market structures, regulatory coherence, and community engagement.
The hard analyses highlighted the critical role of robust infrastructure, system redundancy, digitalization, and advanced control mechanisms in maintaining operational stability across diverse energy systems. Simultaneously, the soft analyses revealed that trust, stakeholder coordination, adaptive governance, international relations, diplomacy and energy policy and socio-economic alignment significantly influence the effectiveness of these technical solutions. The findings indicate that misalignment between technical capabilities and institutional or social contexts can undermine system performance, even in highly advanced energy networks.
By integrating these perspectives, the study contributes a holistic framework for assessing and enhancing stability in energy communities. This integrated approach is particularly relevant in the context of energy transitions, where legacy systems coexist with emerging technologies and decentralized energy models. Future research should further operationalize this framework through empirical case studies and quantitative modeling, supporting policymakers, industry stakeholders, and communities in designing resilient, inclusive, and sustainable energy systems.
Recent trends of smart energy communities
a) Growth of local renewable + Digital energy sharing:
  • Community Solar, Energy Clubs & Prosumers: Energy communities are enabling local production, use, and trading of electricity – reducing dependence on large utilities and grid congestion. Households with solar panels, batteries, and EVs can exchange energy within the community; Cooperative models (e.g., in the UK & Spain) let residents link consumption with local renewables and benefit from lower prices and reduced bills (~10–30% reported);
  • Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Trading: Academic and industry research highlights blockchain and P2P platforms to support transparent, decentralized energy transactions among community members (prosumers and consumers).
b) Technology driving smarter local energy systems:
  • AI, IoT & Predictive Energy Management: The integration of AI and IoT enables real-time monitoring, predictive load balancing, and dynamic energy sharing to optimize local grids;
  • Smart Meters & Grid Automation: Smart meters and analytics let consumers track usage and support efficient energy distribution – key foundations for SECs.;
  • Blockchain & Digital Platforms: Blockchain-based energy management systems are being tested to eliminate intermediaries, enhance scalability, and tailor community solutions.
c) Microgrids as building blocks for communities:
  • Microgrid Expansion: Community microgrids that combine local renewables, storage, and control systems are spreading – especially in the U.S., Europe, and island contexts – boosting resilience and sustainability;
  • Interconnected Multi-Site Systems: Trends show a shift from isolated microgrids to connected local energy networks managing multiple sites or clusters for broader energy reliability.
d) Market and policy trends:
  • Growing Market Size: The SEC and broader smart community markets are projected to grow rapidly over the next decade (e.g., revenue rising significantly by 2032);
  • EU & National Policies Supporting Energy Communities: European policies (e.g., Spain’s RD-Law and EU renewable community frameworks) are accelerating adoption by enabling shared self-consumption and broader distribution areas;
  • Grid Integration Challenges & Opportunities: Energy community growth prompts changes in market design, regulation, and grid architecture to fully integrate localized energy resources.
e) Social & Environmental benefits:
  • Energy Access & Equity: Community projects are making renewable energy more accessible to vulnerable and low-income households, reducing energy poverty;
  • Local Sustainability: SECs lower carbon emissions and enhance local energy resilience, especially in regions with extreme weather or grid vulnerabilities.
f) Key emerging patterns:
  • Decentralization - Prosumer-driven energy generation & local trading;
  • Digitalization – AI, IoT, blockchain improve energy management;
  • Resilience – Microgrids strengthen local energy security;
  • Policy support – Regulatory frameworks enable SEC growth;
  • Market expansion – Smart energy community solutions growing fast.

References

  1. Popescu, C.; Panait, M.; Palazzo, M.; Siano, A. Energy Transition in European Union—Challenges and Opportunities. In Energy Transition. Industrial Ecology; Khan, S.A.R., Panait, M., Guillen, Puime, Raimi, F.L., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Daniel Fîță, Sorin Mihai Radu, Marcela Draghilă, Antonia Obreja, Ioan Sima, Cristian Sigheartău, Alin Cruceru, Alexandru Radu, Geopolitics, International Relations, Security Studies (in romanian: Geopolitică, Relații internaționale, Studii de securitate), Risoprint Cluj Napoca Publishing House. 2025; ISBN 978-973-53-3386-7.
  3. Glover, J.D.; Overbye, T.; Sarma, M.S. Power System Analysis and Design, 6th ed.; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wen, B.; Wang, J.; Guo, Y. Big Data Analytics for Smart Grid: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 91, 720–733. [Google Scholar]
  5. Daniel Fîță, Alin Cruceru, Gabriela Popescu, Marcela Draghilă, Asami Lișu, Alexandru Radu, Smart Power – Analysis of Soft and Hard Power in International Relations (in romanian: Smart Power – Analiza Soft și Hard în Relațiile Internaționale), Risoprint Cluj Napoca Publishing House. 2025; ISBN 978-973-53-3461-1.
  6. Budka, K.C.; Deshpande, J.G.; Thottan, M. Communication Networks for Smart Grids; Springer: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  7. Farhangi, H. A Road Map to Integration: Perspectives on Smart Grid Development. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 2014, 12, 52–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Daniel Fîță, Olga Bucovețchi, Gabriel Bujor Băbuț, Alin Cruceru, Alexandru Radu, Marcela Drăghilă, Asami Lișu, Resilience – The New Vector of Global Power. Geopolitics, Hard & Soft Power, and the Dynamics of International Relations (in romanian: Reziliența – Noul vector al puterii mondiale. Geopolitica, Hard & Soft Power și dinamica Relațiilor Internaționale), Risoprint Cluj Napoca Publishing House. 2025; ISBN 978-973-53-3480-2.
  9. Bórawski, P.; Holden, L.; Bełdycka-Bórawska, A. Perspectives of Photovoltaic Energy Market Development in the European Union. Energy 2023, 270, 126804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Petrilean, D.C.; Fîță, N.D.; Vasilescu, G.D.; Ilieva-Obretenova, M.; Tataru, D.; Cruceru, E.A.; Mateiu, C.I.; Nicola, A.; Darabont, D.-C.; Cazac, A.-M.; Bejinariu, C. Sustainability Management Through the Assessment of Instability and Insecurity Risk Scenarios in Romania’s Energy Critical Infrastructures. Sustainability 2025, 17, 2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rîurean, S.; Fîță, N.D.; Pasculescu, D.; Slușariuc, R. Securing Photovoltaic Systems as Critical Infrastructure: A Multi-Layered Assessment of Risk, Safety, and Cybersecurity. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Beňa, L.; Nowak, M.; Kusiński, M. Analysis of the Impact of Micro Photovoltaic Installations on the Voltage in the Low Voltage Distribution Network. Int. J. Power Syst. Eng. 2021, 12, 89–101. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fita, N.D.; Utu, I.; Marcu, M.D.; Pasculescu, D.; Mila, I.O.; Popescu, F.G.; Lazar, T.; Schiopu, A.M.; Muresan-Grecu, F.; Cruceru, E.A. Global Energy Crisis and the Risk of Blackout: Interdisciplinary Analysis and Perspectives on Energy Infrastructure and Security. Energies 2025, 18, 4244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pasculescu, D.; Riurean, S.; Obretenova, M.I.; Lazar, T.; Tatar, A.M.; Fita, N.D. Intelligent Modeling of PV – BESS Microgrids for Enhanced Stability, Cyber–Physical Resilience and Blackout Prevention. Energies 2025, 19, no. 1:148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. OMV Petrom Company. 2026. Available online: https://www.omvpetrom.com/en (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  16. Petroleum Services Group Company. 2026. Available online: https://www.gspoffshore.com/ (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  17. Conpet Company. 2026. Available online: https://www.conpet.ro/ (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  18. Oil Terminal Company. 2026. Available online: https://oil-terminal.com/en/ (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  19. Rompetrol Rafinare Company. 2026. Available online: https://rompetrol-rafinare.kmginternational.com/en/homepage (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  20. Lukoil Company. 2026. Available online: https://lukoil.ro/ro (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  21. Romgaz Company. 2026. Available online: https://www.romgaz.ro/en (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  22. Transgaz Company. 2026. Available online: https://www.transgaz.ro/ro (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  23. National Uranium Company. in romanian: Compania Natională a Uraniului. 2026. Available online: https://www.cnu.ro/ (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  24. Nuclearelectrica Company. 2026. Available online: https://nuclearelectrica.ro/cne/ (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  25. Autonomous Administration for Nuclear Activities (in romanian: Regia Autonomă a Activităților Nucleare). 2026. Available online: http://www.raan.ro/ (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  26. National Heavy Water Management Center Centrul National de Management al Apei Grele. 2026. Available online: https://www.cnmag.ro/ (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  27. Jiu Valley Energy Complex Complexul Energetic Valea Jiului. 2026. Available online: https://www.cevj.ro/ (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  28. Oltenia Energy Complex (in romanian: Complexul Energetic Oltenia). 2026. Available online: http://ceoltenia.ro/ro/ (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  29. Transelectrica Company. 2026. Available online: https://www.transelectrica.ro/ (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  30. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas – ENTSO-G. 2026. Available online: https://www.entsog.eu/ (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  31. The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity – ENTSO-E. 2026. Available online: https://www.entsoe.eu/ (accessed on 4 January 2026).
  32. Bórawski, P.; Holden, L.; Bełdycka-Bórawska, A. Perspectives of Photovoltaic Energy Market Development in the European Union. Energy 2023, 270, 126804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Beňa, L.; Nowak, M.; Kusiński, M. Analysis of the Impact of Micro Photovoltaic Installations on the Voltage in the Low Voltage Distribution Network. Int. J. Power Syst. Eng. 2021, 12, 89–101. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fuentes, S.; Villafafila-Robles, R.; Lerner, E. Composed Index for the Evaluation of the Energy Security of Power Systems: Application to the Case of Argentina. Energies 2020, 13, 3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Motakatla, V.R.; Liu, W.; Hao, J.; Padullaparti, H.V.; Kumar, U.; Choi, S.L.; Mendoza, I. Integrated Transmission and Distribution Co-Simulation Platform for Demonstration of Bulk Grid Services Using Distributed Energy Resources. Energies 2024, 17, 3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nguyen, H. Newton-Raphson Method in Complex Form for Power System Load Flow Analysis. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2000, 15, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ulbig, A.; Borsche, T.S.; Andersson, G. Impact of Low Rotational Inertia on Power System Stability and Operation. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2014(47), 7290–7297. [CrossRef]
  38. Li, H.; Vittal, V. Co-Simulation for Power System Dynamic Analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE PES General Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 22–26 July 2012; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  39. Siozinys, V.; Siozinys, M.; Rimkus, A.; Dapkute, A. Virtual Power Plant as a Tool for Cost-Reflective Network Charging and Energy Management. Elektron. Elektrotechnika 2023, 29, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  40. Motter, A.E.; Lai, Y.C. Cascade-Based Attacks on Complex Networks. Phys. Rev. E 2002, 66, 065102(R). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhou, K.; Yang, S. Digital Twin Framework and Its Application to Power Grid. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 2019, 5, 156–163. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sioshansi, F.P. Smart Grid: Integrating Renewable, Distributed and Efficient Energy; Elsevier: Waltham, MA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Smart Energy Power (soft and hard) (own source).
Figure 1. Smart Energy Power (soft and hard) (own source).
Preprints 193635 g001
Figure 2. Romanian Energy Sector (own source).
Figure 2. Romanian Energy Sector (own source).
Preprints 193635 g002
Figure 3. National Oil and Gasoline Transport System (source: www.conpet.ro).
Figure 3. National Oil and Gasoline Transport System (source: www.conpet.ro).
Preprints 193635 g003
Figure 4. Oil pressure instrument.
Figure 4. Oil pressure instrument.
Preprints 193635 g004
Figure 5. National Gas Transmission System (source: www.transgaz.ro).
Figure 5. National Gas Transmission System (source: www.transgaz.ro).
Preprints 193635 g005
Figure 6. Gas pressure instrument.
Figure 6. Gas pressure instrument.
Preprints 193635 g006
Figure 7. Nuclear pressure instrument.
Figure 7. Nuclear pressure instrument.
Preprints 193635 g007
Figure 8. Mining pressure instrument.
Figure 8. Mining pressure instrument.
Preprints 193635 g008
Figure 9. Simplified scheme at National Power System – NPS.
Figure 9. Simplified scheme at National Power System – NPS.
Preprints 193635 g009
Figure 11. Electricity pressure instrument.
Figure 11. Electricity pressure instrument.
Preprints 193635 g011
Figure 12. ENTSO-G members.
Figure 12. ENTSO-G members.
Preprints 193635 g012
Figure 13. ENTSO-E members.
Figure 13. ENTSO-E members.
Preprints 193635 g013
Table 1. Presentation of the complete oil cycle in Romania.
Table 1. Presentation of the complete oil cycle in Romania.
Nr.
Crt.
STEPS RESOURCE TYPE OPERATOR
1. Resource Management hydrocarbon National Agency for Mineral Resources
2. Prospect onshore hydrocarbon Prospecting Operators
3. Exploration – Development – Exploitation onshore hydrocarbon OMV Petrom
Other Exploration Operators – Development – Operation
Exploration – Development – Exploitation offshore OMV Petrom
Other Exploration Operators – Development – Operation
4. Transport oil CONPET
5. Storage oil OMV Petrom
OIL Terminal
CONPET
fuel OMV Petrom
Lukoil
Rompetrol Refine
6. Refinement oil OMV Petrom (Petrobrazi)
Rompetrol Rafine (Petromidia, Vega)
Lukoil (Petrotel Lukoil)
other Refining Operators
7. Distribution fuel OMV
Petrom
Rompetrol Rafine
Lukoil
other operators
Table 2. Presentation of the complete gas cycle in Romania.
Table 2. Presentation of the complete gas cycle in Romania.
Nr.
Crt.
STEPS RESOURCE TYPE OPERATOR
1. Resource Management hydrocarbon National Agency for Mineral Resources
2. Prospect onshore hydrocarbon Prospecting Operators
3. Exploration – Development – Exploitation onshore hydrocarbon Romgaz
OMV Petrom
Other Exploration Operators –
Development – Operation
Exploration – Development – Exploitation offshore OMV Petrom
Romgaz
Other Exploration Operators –
Development – Operation
4. Transport natural gases Transgaz
5. Storage natural gases Romgaz - Depogaz Ploiești
Engie - Depomureș
6. Distribution natural gases Distribution Operators
7. Supply natural gases Supply Operators
Table 3. Presentation of the complete nuclear cycle in Romania.
Table 3. Presentation of the complete nuclear cycle in Romania.
Nr.
Crt.
STEPS RESOURCE TYPE OPERATOR SUBOPERATOR
1. Resource Management uranium ore National Agency for Mineral Resources
2. Exploitation uranium ore National Uranium Company Uranium Mining Crucea
Uranium Mining Botusana
3. Processing / Refining uranium ore National Uranium Company Feldioara Plant
4. Manufacture of Nuclear Fuel nuclear fuel bundles Nuclearelectrica Pitesti Nuclear Fuel Factory
5. Electricity Production natural uranium Nuclearelectrica Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant
heavy water National Center for Heavy Water Management
CNMAG
(state reserves: heavy water)
ROMAG PROD Heavy Water Plant Drobeta Turnu Severin
National Administration of State Reserves and Special Issues - Ministry of Internal Affairs (state reserves: heavy water)
6. Storage radioactive waste Nuclearelectrica Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant
Table 4. Presentation of the complete mining cycle in Romania.
Table 4. Presentation of the complete mining cycle in Romania.
Nr.
Crt.
STEPS RESOURCE TYPE OPERATOR SUBOPERATOR
1. Resource Management coal
coal / lignite
National Agency for Mineral Resources
2. Exploitation
Preparation
Transport
coal Jiu Valley Energy Complex Lonea Mining, Livezeni Mining, Vulcan Mining, Lupeni Mining
lignite Oltenia Energy Complex Roșia – Rovinari Mining,
Jilț Mining, Motru Mining
3. Electricity generation coal Jiu Valley Energy Complex Paroșeni Power Plant
lignite Oltenia Energy Complex Rovinari Power Plant, Turceni Power Plant, Ișalnița Power Plant, Craiova II Power Plant
Table 5. NPS international interconnections.
Table 5. NPS international interconnections.
THE COUNTRY CONNECTION TYPE
(Overhead Power Line)
VOLTAGE LEVEL
Ukraine Roșiori – Mukacevo 400 kV – connection to the EU
Isaccea – Southern Ukraine 400 kV (750 kV gauge) – decommissioned line
Hungary Nadab – Bekescsaba 400 kV – connections to the EU
Arad – Sandorfalva
Serbia Resita – Pancevo 2 400 kV – connections to the EU
Iron Gates – Djerdap
Bulgaria Țânțăreni – Kosloduy 400 kV – connections to the EU
Rahman – Dobrudja
Stupina – Varna 400 kV (750 kV gauge) – connection to the EU
Republic Of Moldova Isaccea – Vulcanesti 400 kV
Table 6. Power plants from National Power System (fuel type).
Table 6. Power plants from National Power System (fuel type).
No. Fuel type Power
[MW]
Name of Power Plant
a) Water operators 6 762 Hidroelectrica
b) Nuclear operators 1 413 Nuclearelectrica
c) Coal operators 6 240 Jiu Valley Energy Complex, Oltenia Energy Complex
d) Hydrocarbon operators 5 787 OMV Petrom, Romgaz
e) Aeolian operators 3 027 Renewable Energy Sources operators
f) Biomass operators 130
g) Photovoltaic operators 1 348
TOTAL 24 738
Table 7. Presentation of the complete power cycle in Romania.
Table 7. Presentation of the complete power cycle in Romania.
Nr.
Crt.
STEPS RESOURCE TYPE OPERATOR SUBOPERATOR
1. Resource Management oil National Agency for Mineral Resources
natural gases
uranium ore
coal
2. Production natural gases Romgaz SA / OMV Petrom SA
coal: lignite Oltenia Energy Complex
coal: coal Jiu Valley Energy Complex
uranium ore Nuclearelectrica
the water Hidroelectrica
3. Transport electricity Transelectrica
4. Distribution electricity Distribuţie Energie Electrică România
Rețele Electrice România
DelGaz Grid
Distribuție Oltenia
5. Supply electricity Supply operators
Table 8. Energy security strategy at the community, national, and regional levels.
Table 8. Energy security strategy at the community, national, and regional levels.
Level Sector Main objectives Strategic Measures / Instruments Examples / Comments
Community Oil Ensuring local supply, reducing dependence on imports Local fuel stocks; Partnerships with local distributors;
Promotion of alternative transport and energy efficiency.
Community fuel stations, local car-sharing programs
Gas Continuity of supply, consumer safety Network monitoring systems;
Emergency plans in case of shortages;
Community awareness for responsible consumption.
Community Gas Information and Alert Centers
Nuclear Education and information, public safety Information campaigns;
Emergency drills and training.
Public training in the event of nuclear incidents
Mining Occupational safety and environmental protection Strict safety regulations;
Environmental and pollution monitoring.
Local Environmental and Safety Inspectorates
Electricitity Continuity of supply, reduction of consumption Backup systems (generators);
Energy efficiency program;
Loss detection.
Community Microgrids, Smart Public Lighting
National Oil Supply security, price stability National strategic stocks;
Diversification of sources;
Regulations and import/export taxes.
Strategic oil reserves, international agreements
Gas Reducing external dependency, ensuring supply continuity Development of transport and storage infrastructure;
Long-term contracts with various suppliers;
Alternative sources (LNG).
LNG Terminals,
Regional Interconnections
Nuclear Energy independence, power plant safety Development of own nuclear capabilities;
Strict safety regulations;
Nuclear waste management.
Nuclear Power Plant, National Agency for Nuclear Safety
Mining Supply of strategic resources Sustainable resource exploitation;
Strict regulation and export control.
Coal resources,
critical ores
Electricitity Continuity of supply, system flexibility National Energy and Smart Grid Plan;
Storage and Renewable Capacities;
Regional Interconnections.
Smart grids,
backup power plants
Regional Oil Cross-Border energy stability and security Regional strategic infrastructure;
Cooperation agreements;
Monitoring of regional; markets
Oil corridors,
regional hubs
Gas Common security, vulnerability reduction Interconnections between countries;
Regional LNG infrastructure;
Crisis response plans.
European gas networks,
common storage
Nuclear Regional standardization and safety Standardization of nuclear regulations;
Cooperation in case of incidents;
Joint research projects.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Mining Ensuring access to critical resources Joint projects for mining and recycling;
Supply chain security policies.
European strategic resources,
ore recycling
Electricitity Regional grid stability and energy transition Regional energy markets;
Interconnected grids and shared storage;
Regional green energy projects.
European networks, HVDC interconnections,
joint offshore wind farms
Table 9. Strategic Directions and Concrete Actions for the Implementation of the Energy Security Strategy.
Table 9. Strategic Directions and Concrete Actions for the Implementation of the Energy Security Strategy.
Level Sector Strategic Directions Concrete actions
Community Oil Reducing dependence on fuels Promotion of public and alternative transportation (bicycles, electric vehicles);
Local fuel storage for critical situations.
Gas Increasing consumption efficiency Thermal insulation of buildings;
Local programs for responsible consumption.
Nuclear Information and Safety Community education regarding nuclear power plants;
Local evacuation plans and emergency drills.
Mining Sustainable exploitation Monitoring environmental impact;
Material recycling projects.
Electricitity Responsible consumption and resilience Installation of solar panels on public buildings;
Local microgrids for continuity.
National Oil Diversification of sources Conclusion of international agreements for supply;
Development of domestic refineries.
Gas Supply Security Development of gas infrastructure (pipelines, LNG terminals);
National strategic reserves.
Nuclear Development and modernization of capacities Modernization of existing power plants;
Investments in nuclear research and safe fuel.
Mining Ensuring Strategic Resources Controlled exploitation of critical resources;
Strict environmental regulations.
Electricitity Sustainability and Reliability Development of smart grids;
Investments in renewable energy and hydropower.
Regional Oil Interstate cooperation Creating common reserves;
Regional oil crisis plans.
Gas Interconnectivity and Diversification Development of gas corridors between countries;
Regional partnerships for LNG.
Nuclear Safety and Standardization Regional agreements on nuclear safety;
Exchange of best practices and monitoring.
Mining Sustainable development Cooperation for the responsible exploitation of resources;
Standardization regarding environment and safety.
Electricitity Interconnection and Stability Creation of regional energy markets;
Common backup and support systems in case of shortages.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated