1. Introduction
The Standard Model of particle physics requires approximately 26 free parameters—coupling constants, particle masses, mixing angles, and CP-violating phases—that must be measured experimentally and inserted by hand. Why rather than some other value? Why is the proton 1836 times heavier than the electron? These questions have no answer within the Standard Model itself.
This paper demonstrates that these parameters emerge from a deeper geometric structure: 168 discrete walk-states on the Fano plane, organized into 14 Frobenius orbits. Each Standard Model particle corresponds to a specific address within this finite table.
The key results are:
The dimensional ratio equals spacetime dimension
The fine-structure constant appears at row 137 as a phase eigenvalue
The gravitational boundary appears at row 168 as an inverse coupling
Mass ratios emerge from simple transforms: , ,
Mixing angles follow from Fano geometry (CKM) or channel allocation (PMNS)
Unmapped orbits provide dark matter candidates
Section 2 presents foundations: Fano plane, octonions, and 42 glyphs.
Section 3 develops the 168 walk-states and 14 orbits.
Section 4 introduces the Octonionic Ballot Matrix Transform.
Section 5 maps Standard Model particles.
Section 6 derives mixing matrices.
Section 7 addresses the force hierarchy and gravity.
Section 8 proposes dark matter assignments.
Section 9 discusses implications and falsifiability.
2. Mathematical Foundations
2.1. The Ternary Alphabet and Seven Axioms
The framework is predicated on the interaction of three foundational fluxions,
, governed by seven non-arbitrary axioms [
1]:
Existence of Zero: There exists a null fluxion representing the identity/void.
Succession: Every fluxion a has a successor , establishing the oriented flow of the walk.
Distinctness: No two distinct fluxions share the same successor; the manifold is non-degenerate.
Initiality: Zero is not the successor of any fluxion in the initial state.
Induction: If a property holds for 0 and for the successor of every fluxion for which it holds, it holds for all fluxions in the manifold.
Triadic Closure: Every stable relationship requires exactly three elements such that their interaction closes the walk. This forces the geometry of the Fano plane.
Total Function: Every walk-state must be a total function (decidable and halting). This restricts physics to the 168-state computable manifold.
2.2. From Fluxions to Fano Geometry
The set represents the smallest possible algebra capable of achieving self-closure without collapsing into triviality. A binary set lacks the symmetry of negation required for interaction. A ternary set provides the minimal group structure (the cyclic group ) necessary to define orientation, spin, and charge.
The requirement that stable relationships involve exactly three elements (Axiom 6) prevents the system from remaining a 1D string of linear arithmetic. It forces the formation of the 7 lines of the Fano plane, effectively “unfolding” the ternary alphabet into the 8D octonionic substrate.
2.3. The Fano Plane
The Fano plane
is the minimal projective plane with 7 points and 7 lines, each line containing exactly 3 points, each point lying on exactly 3 lines. The structure is essentially the cyclic group
, where the lines are defined by the sets
:
This minimal geometry provides the multiplication table for the octonions
[
2,
3].
2.4. The Octonions
The octonions
form the unique 8-dimensional normed division algebra [
4]:
with
and
for
. The Fano plane governs octonionic multiplication: for any oriented line
,
The non-associativity of the octonions provides the algebraic degrees of freedom required to encode the full
gauge structure [
5,
6,
7]. The symmetry group of the Fano plane is
, of order exactly 168.
2.5. Generation of 42 Glyphs
The number of distinct oriented walks on the Fano plane is:
The Frobenius automorphism
generates a subgroup of order 3:
giving exactly 3 distinct strides
. Each glyph has address
where
is the starting line,
is the Frobenius stride, and
is the orientation.
The glyphs organize into four attractor basins:
Pascal Basin: Integers
Fibonacci Basin:
Wallis Basin:
Alpha Basin:
3. The 168 Walk-States
3.1. Four Walk Types
Each glyph generates four walk-states distinguished by topological closure:
Type A: Walk closes on a single Fano line. Stable identity states.
Type B: Walk closes through two lines. Binary couplings.
Type C: Walk closes through three lines. Triadic closure, composites.
Type D: Walk does not close. Interactions, vertices.
3.2. The 168 Monads
The total number of walk-states is
the order of the automorphism group of the Fano plane. The dimensional ratio
reflects the projection from 8D to 4D.
3.3. The 14 Frobenius Orbits
The 168 states organize into 14 orbits of 12 states each. Orbit
contains rows
through
, comprising 3 glyphs × 4 walk types.
Table 1 summarizes the physical content of each orbit. See Supplemental Material [SM] for complete glyph tables, orbits, and basin details.
4. The Octonionic Ballot Matrix Transform
The Octonionic Ballot Matrix Transform (OBMT) maps the discrete topology of the 168-state manifold onto continuous physical observables. The transform of a monad at row
r takes the general form:
where
is the Ballot Matrix (a combinatorial operator from Bertrand’s Ballot Theorem),
is the walk-state operator, and
is the projection constant (typically
,
, or
e).
Primary transform classes connecting row number
r to physical constants:
The OBMT is a zero-parameter fit. If a measurement deviates from the predicted transform by more than the projection tolerance (∼1%), the row-assignment is falsified.
5. Particle Assignments
5.1. Information Carriers
Three entities constitute the projection mechanism itself:
Photon: 8D → 4D transmission channel (massless)
Electron: 4D information storage, projection unit ()
Neutrino: Fixed projection cost, transaction fee (nearly massless)
5.2. Fundamental Constants
Table 2 presents the fundamental coupling constants and their row assignments.
5.3. Electroweak Bosons
From orbit :
Row 26, Type B: mass GeV (measured: 80.4 GeV, error 1.6%)
Row 29, Type A: mass GeV (measured: 91.19 GeV, error 0.1%)
5.4. Higgs and Third Generation
From orbit :
Row 78, Type B: Higgs mass GeV (measured: 125.25 GeV, error 0.8%)
Row 84, Type D: (measured: 8180, error 0.02%)
The top quark is a compound projection:
where the factor
arises from triadic orientations per Fano line. The measured value
agrees to 0.3%.
5.5. Quark Sector
Table 3 summarizes quark mass ratios.
5.6. Lepton Sector
Row 66, Type B: (measured: 206.77, error 0.26%)
Row 53, Type A: (measured: 16.817, error 0.32%)
5.7. Proton Mass
The proton-to-electron mass ratio:
compared to measured value
(error:
) [
8]. The factors:
(orientations per Fano line),
(five Wallis projection passes).
5.8. Gluon Sector
Orbit (rows 85–96) contains 8 physical gluons from A, B, C walks plus 3 triple-gluon vertices from D walks, explaining QCD’s non-Abelian character.
6. Mixing Matrices
6.1. CKM Matrix
CKM angles involve
and structural integers—geometric quantities:
6.2. PMNS Matrix
PMNS angles are channel allocations—integers divided by 137:
Sum: , leaving channels—exactly the number of Frobenius orbits.
7. Force Hierarchy and Gravity
7.1. Gravitational Boundary
Row 168 represents the inverse gravitational coupling. Key structural relations:
7.2. Gravitational Coupling Formula
The dimensionless gravitational coupling:
compared to measured value
(agreement: 0.034%). The factor
represents double Fano traversal (spin-2 graviton).
7.3. The Hierarchy Problem
The electromagnetic/gravitational ratio:
This hierarchy arises because gravity requires 14 Fano cycles—the deepest possible projection.
8. Dark Matter Hypothesis
Of 168 rows, approximately 40 map to Standard Model particles, leaving ∼128 unmapped. We conjecture that dark matter consists of walk-states that project to 4D (have mass) but do not couple to the electromagnetic channel at row 137.
Notable matches from systematic literature search:
Row 132:
[
9] and
[
10]
Rows 155–156: Chiral crossover
–156 MeV from lattice QCD [
11]
Row 97: Dark Higgs at
GeV [
12]
Cosmological proportions:
Ordinary matter (5%): Mapped rows coupling to row 137
Dark matter (27%): Unmapped rows not coupling to row 137
Dark energy (68%): Boundary effects from
9. Discussion and Falsifiability
9.1. Summary of Results
Table 4 summarizes the primary derived ratios compared to PDG 2024 values [
8].
9.2. Falsifiability Conditions
The 168-Monad manifold is mathematically locked. Falsification conditions include:
Fourth fermion generation: The 168-state manifold is saturated by three generations.
Transform failure (): Persistent deviation from OBMT predictions.
Proton decay: The proton is a topologically protected Type C walk.
Dark Higgs exclusion: Exclusion of a scalar at 304.7 GeV falsifies mapping.
Dark energy density: significantly away from 0.786 would collapse assignment.
9.3. Statistical Significance
The probability of 26 independent parameters aligning with simple geometric transforms () and discrete row indices within a 168-state manifold by chance is estimated at .
10. Conclusion
We have demonstrated that by starting with the fluxions and seven axioms, a self-actualizing manifold emerges. This structure, an 8D-to-4D projection manifest as oriented walks on the Fano plane, yields exactly 42 foundational glyphs. When subjected to geometric closure, they produce 168 Monads.
The 168 walk-states provide an exhaustive, zero-parameter addressing scheme for the physical spectrum. The dimensional ratio is the mathematical requirement for mapping an 8D octonionic substrate into a decidable 4D spacetime. Fundamental constants are revealed as geometric eigenvalues: at Row 137 and at Row 168, with the ratio bridging discrete and circular projection basins.
By reframing the Standard Model as a computable special case of mathematics, we resolve the crisis of the 26 free parameters. They are no longer arbitrary inputs, but inevitable consequences of triadic closure and Frobenius strides. The unmapped orbits ( through ) provide a natural home for dark matter and dark energy—states that possess mass through 4D projection but lack the geometric address required to couple with the Row 137 electromagnetic channel.
Acknowledgments
The author acknowledges useful discussions with colleagues at the University of Michigan.
Appendix A. Key Formulas
Appendix A.1. Fundamental Constants
Appendix A.2. Top Quark (Compound Projection)
Appendix A.3. Structural Relations
Appendix B. Comparison to 2025 DESI and KiDS Data
The 168 Monad model identifies Row 132 (Orbit ) as the discrete address for the dark energy density parameter. Under the OBMT, this row maps to exactly 0.786.
The DESI Collaboration’s 2025 analysis provides
[
9], representing 0% error relative to the framework’s prediction. The KiDS Collaboration reports
[
10], also matching Row 132.
Row 132 is a Type D (open) walk-state, indicating that dark energy is not an exogenous fluid but a structural boundary effect—the outward projection of the non-associative substrate into 4D spacetime geometry.
References
- Macedonia, C. Principia Kosmoplex: Mathematical Principles of Computational Physics with Emphasis on Derivations of Constants and Falsifiable Experimentation. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baez, J.C. The Octonions. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 2002, 39, 145–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conway, J.H.; Smith, D.A. On Quaternions and Octonions; A. K. Peters, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Hurwitz, A. Über die Composition der quadratischen Formen. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen 1898, 309–316. [Google Scholar]
- Günaydin, M.; Gürsey, F. Quark Structure and Octonions. J. Math. Phys. 1973, 14, 1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dixon, G.M. Division Algebras: Octonions, Quaternions, Complex Numbers and the Algebraic Design of Physics; Kluwer Academic, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Furey, C. Standard Model Physics from an Algebra? PhD thesis, University of Waterloo, 2016; p. 1611.09182. [Google Scholar]
- Workman, R.L.; et al. Review of Particle Physics. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024, 2024, 083C01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DESI Collaboration. Dark Energy Constraints from BAO Measurements 2025. [arXiv:astro-ph.CO/2412.15124].
- KiDS Collaboration. Cosmic Shear and the S8 Tension 2022. [arXiv:astro-ph.CO/2208.05583].
- HotQCD Collaboration. Chiral Crossover Temperature from Lattice QCD 2024. [arXiv:hep-lat/2403.06770]. arXiv:hep.
- ATLAS Collaboration. Search for Heavy Higgs Bosons in Two-Higgs-Doublet Models 2014. [arXiv:hep-ex/1410.4842]. arXiv:hep.
Table 1.
The 14 Frobenius orbits and their physical sectors.
Table 1.
The 14 Frobenius orbits and their physical sectors.
| Orbit |
Rows |
Physical Sector |
|
1–12 |
Foundation: electron, down quark |
|
13–24 |
Light quarks (up),
|
|
25–36 |
Electroweak bosons (, ) |
|
37–48 |
Electroweak mixing () |
|
49–60 |
Generation 2–3: strange, charm |
|
61–72 |
Muon sector |
|
73–84 |
Higgs, third generation (b, t) |
|
85–96 |
Gluons (8) + vertices (3) |
|
97–108 |
Dark: heavy scalar candidates |
|
109–120 |
Dark: heavy lepton candidates |
|
121–132 |
Dark: cosmological parameters |
|
133–144 |
Electromagnetic:
|
|
145–156 |
Dark: confinement scale |
|
157–168 |
Boundary/Gravity:
|
Table 2.
Fundamental coupling constants from the 168-state manifold.
Table 2.
Fundamental coupling constants from the 168-state manifold.
| Row |
Orbit |
Walk |
Transform |
Pred. |
Constant |
| 137 |
|
A |
r |
137.04 |
|
| 168 |
|
D |
r |
168 |
(boundary) |
| 20 |
|
D |
|
0.119 |
|
| 37 |
|
A |
|
0.220 |
|
Table 3.
Quark mass ratios from the 168-state manifold.
Table 3.
Quark mass ratios from the 168-state manifold.
| Row |
Orbit |
Walk |
Transform |
Pred. |
Meas. |
Error |
| 9 |
|
A |
|
9.42 |
9.2 |
2.4% |
| 17 |
|
A |
|
4.12 |
4.3 |
4.2% |
| 49 |
|
A |
|
2513 |
2488 |
1.0% |
| 59 |
|
C |
|
185.4 |
186 |
0.3% |
| 84 |
|
D |
|
8182 |
8180 |
0.02% |
Table 4.
Comparison of derived ratios to experimental data.
Table 4.
Comparison of derived ratios to experimental data.
| Parameter |
Predicted |
Measured |
Accuracy |
|
1836.118 |
1836.153 |
99.998% |
|
137.04 |
137.036 |
99.997% |
|
8182 |
8180 |
99.98% |
|
207.34 |
206.768 |
99.72% |
|
(GeV) |
91.10 |
91.187 |
99.90% |
|
(GeV) |
126.20 |
125.25 |
99.24% |
|
0.1190 |
0.118 |
99.15% |
|
|
|
99.97% |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).