Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Role of Single-Ion Anisotropy in Stabilizing Higher-Order Skyrmion Crystals in D3d-Symmetric Magnets

Submitted:

16 December 2025

Posted:

17 December 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
We investigate the role of single-ion anisotropy in stabilizing higher-order skyrmion crystal phases in centrosymmetric magnets under D3d symmetry. Using a classical spin model that incorporates both single-ion and D3d-type magnetic anisotropies, we perform simulated annealing calculations to explore the ground-state spin configurations. We find that a skyrmion crystal with a skyrmion number of two is stabilized over a wide range of parameters of single-ion anisotropy and D3d-type anisotropy. We also show that the skyrmion core position shifts from an interstitial site to an on-site location as the magnitude of the easy-axis single-ion anisotropy increases. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the magnetic field drives a variety of topological phase transitions depending on the sign and magnitude of the single-ion and D3d-type anisotropies. These results provide a possible microscopic understanding of how complex topological spin textures can be stabilized in centrosymmetric D3d magnets, suggesting that multiple phases with topological spin textures could emerge even in the absence of the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Magnetic skyrmions, particle-like topological spin textures characterized by a quantized winding number [1,2,3,4], have been extensively studied owing to their fundamental importance in topological magnetism and their potential applications in spintronic devices [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. The nontrivial topology of skyrmion spin textures gives rise to emergent electromagnetism, such as the topological Hall effect [14,15,16,17,18,19,20], and endows them with remarkable stability against perturbations [13,21,22,23,24,25]. In many noncentrosymmetric systems, skyrmion crystals (SkX), which correspond to a periodic alignment of skyrmions, are stabilized by the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya (DM) interaction [26,27], which favors spin twisting [3,4,28,29,30,31,32,33]. This mechanism has been realized in various chiral and polar magnets, including metallic B20 compounds like MnSi [17,34,35,36,37,38], Fe1−xCoxSi [39,40,41,42], and FeGe [43,44], and multiferroic insulators like Cu2OSeO3 [45,46,47] and VOSe2O5 [48,49], where the interplay between ferromagnetic exchange interaction and the DM interaction leads to the formation of hexagonal and tetragonal SkXs under external magnetic fields.
In contrast, the emergence of SkXs in centrosymmetric magnets has attracted increasing attention in recent years, as it demonstrates that the DM interaction is not a prerequisite for the formation of SkX spin textures [50,51,52]. In such systems, competing symmetric exchange interactions and magnetic anisotropies can induce multiple-Q states, in which several spin density waves with distinct propagation wave vectors coexist [53,54,55,56,57]. The superposition of these spin density waves naturally gives rise to noncoplanar spin configurations with finite scalar spin chirality, thereby mimicking the topological properties of skyrmions even in the absence of DM interaction [58]. This mechanism provides an alternative and broader route toward realizing SkXs in a wide class of frustrated magnets, including both itinerant and localized spin systems on triangular and square lattices. Experimental realizations have also been reported in centrosymmetric magnets such as the rare-earth intermetallics Gd2PdSi3 [59,60,61,62,63], Gd3Ru4Al12 [64,65,66,67], and GdRu2Si2 [68,69,70,71].
Among the various types of SkXs, higher-order SkXs, which possess a skyrmion number greater than one, have recently been recognized as intriguing topological spin textures [72,73,74,75]. These textures host multiple vortex cores within a single magnetic unit cell and exhibit intricate internal structures distinct from conventional SkX with the skyrmion number of one. The growing interest in higher-order SkXs stems from their potential to generate topological Hall and nonreciprocal transport responses even without external magnetic fields, net magnetization, or relativistic spin–orbit coupling [76,77,78]. Theoretically, such higher-order SkXs can emerge from multi-spin interactions [73,79,80,81] and bond-dependent anisotropy [82,83], whereas experimental observations of higher-order SkX in centrosymmetric materials have not yet been reported. Nevertheless, the microscopic mechanisms that determine the stability range, internal structure, and response of these higher-order SkXs remain incompletely understood. For the experimental realization of such higher-order SkXs, a further theoretical understanding of their stabilization mechanisms is crucial.
The D 3 d point-group symmetry offers an ideal platform for exploring higher-order SkXs with the skyrmion number of two, as its symmetry allows characteristic anisotropic spin interactions that naturally bring about the formation of such phases [84]. In this work, we investigate a classical spin model on a two-dimensional triangular lattice possessing D 3 d symmetry by focusing on the role of single-ion anisotropy on the stability of the higher-order SkX. By performing simulated annealing calculations, we construct the low-temperature zero-field phase diagram as functions of both the single-ion anisotropy and the D 3 d -type magnetic anisotropy. Our results reveal a broad region in parameter space where the higher-order SkX becomes energetically favorable. Moreover, our analysis reveals that the application of a magnetic field induces a series of topological phase transitions, whose nature depends sensitively on both the sign and the strength of the single-ion and D 3 d -type anisotropies. These findings shed light on the possibility of the higher-order SkXs in centrosymmetric D 3 d magnets even without the DM interaction.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce an effective spin model on the triangular lattice with D 3 d symmetry and present the relevant magnetic anisotropy terms, including the single-ion and D 3 d -type anisotropies. The numerical method based on simulated annealing is also described there. In Section 3, we present the ground-state phase diagram at zero magnetic field and show the stability region of the higher-order SkXs by the cooperative effects of the two anisotropies. We then discuss in detail the real-space spin textures, scalar spin chirality distributions, and spin structure factors appearing in the phase diagram. We also examine the effects of an external magnetic field and demonstrate a variety of field-induced phase transitions for representative parameter sets. Finally, Section 4 summarizes our main findings and discusses their implications for the realization of higher-order SkXs in centrosymmetric magnets.

2. Model and Method

To clarify the influence of single-ion anisotropy on the stability of higher-order SkX under centrosymmetric D 3 d point-group symmetry, we consider a classical spin model with magnetic anisotropic interactions on a two-dimensional triangular lattice. The Hamiltonian is written as
H = 2 J ν α β I Q ν α β S Q ν α S Q ν β A i ( S i z ) 2 H i S i z ,
where S i denotes a classical spin vector with unit length ( | S i | = 1 ) at site i. The spin components in momentum space at wave vector Q ν are defined as S Q ν = ( 1 / N ) i S i e i Q ν · r i , with N and r i being the total number of spins and the position vector at site i, respectively. The exchange constant J sets the energy scale and is fixed to J = 1 throughout this study. The second term in Eq. (1) represents the single-ion anisotropy A, originating from spin–orbit coupling under the local crystalline electric field. It controls the preferred spin orientation relative to the z axis: A > 0 corresponds to an easy-axis anisotropy, whereas A < 0 favors an easy-plane alignment. The single-ion anisotropy has been extensively studied in discussing the stability of the SkXs in various systems, including noncentrosymmetric systems [38,53,85,86,87,88,89]. The third term in Eq. (1) stands for the Zeeman coupling in the presence of the out-of-plane magnetic field H.
We restrict the interaction to three symmetry-equivalent ordering wave vectors,
Q 1 = ( π / 3 , 0 ) , Q 2 = ( π / 6 , 3 π / 6 ) , Q 3 = ( π / 6 , 3 π / 6 ) ,
by supposing that the dominant magnetic instabilities on the triangular lattice occur at these ordering wave vectors. Such a situation arises from competing exchange interactions in frustrated insulating magnets [90,91,92,93] and from the Ruderman–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida (RKKY) interaction [94,95,96] in itinerant metallic magnets [97] so that the instability toward the single-Q spiral state is induced [98,99,100]. All other q components are neglected under the assumption that the magnetic susceptibility exhibits sharp peaks at these Q ν . Such a reduced description effectively captures the essential physics of multiple-Q states in a numerically efficient way and has been successfully applied to a variety of frustrated systems, including SkX and other multiple-Q states [101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108], such as Y3Co8Sn4 [109], EuPtSi [110], and EuNiGe3 [111].
The matrix I Q ν α β in Eq. (1) encodes the symmetry-allowed anisotropic exchange interactions associated with the trigonal D 3 d point-group symmetry. Its explicit tensor form is given by
I D 3 d I Q 1 y z = I Q 1 z y = 2 3 I Q 2 x z = 2 3 I Q 2 z x = 2 I Q 2 y z = 2 I Q 2 z y = 2 3 I Q 3 x z = 2 3 I Q 3 z x = 2 I Q 3 y z = 2 I Q 3 z y .
Here, I D 3 d parameterizes the D 3 d -type anisotropy, which favors sinusoidal spin modulations perpendicular to the propagation vectors Q ν . In contrast to the compass- and Kitaev-type bond-dependent anisotropies [112,113,114,115,116,117], which favor purely in-plane sinusoidal spin modulations [82], the present D 3 d -type anisotropy gives rise to spin modulations whose oscillation plane involves both in-plane and out-of-plane components [58]. This anisotropy, allowed under trigonal crystal symmetry, introduces a momentum-resolved anisotropic exchange interaction that can promote noncoplanar multiple-Q spin textures like the higher-order SkX [84].
To determine the equilibrium spin configurations at low temperatures, we perform simulated annealing based on the Metropolis algorithm on 24 × 24 lattices with periodic boundary conditions. Starting from a high temperature T 0 = 1 , the system is gradually cooled according to T n + 1 = α ˜ T n with α ˜ between 0.999995 and 0.999999 , until the final temperature reaches T = 0.0001 . Each annealing sequence consists of 10 5 10 6 Monte Carlo sweeps for both equilibration and measurements. Independent simulations are conducted from different random initial configurations to ensure reproducibility and to identify the ground-state phases.
The magnetic structures are characterized through both momentum-space and real-space observables. The spin structure factor for the spin component α = x , y , z is defined as
S s α ( q ) = 1 N i , j S i α S j α e i q · ( r i r j ) ,
where q is the wave vector in the Brillouin zone. The in-plane contribution is given by S s x y ( q ) = S s x ( q ) + S s y ( q ) . The corresponding Fourier amplitudes at Q ν are obtained from
m Q ν α = S s α ( Q ν ) N .
The averaged magnetization along the field direction is given by
M z = 1 N i S i z .
The topological nature of each spin configuration is evaluated via the scalar spin chirality,
χ sc = 1 N μ R μ χ R sc , χ R sc = S i · ( S j × S k ) ,
where μ = ( u , d ) distinguishes upward and downward triangles, and ( i , j , k ) denote the three sites forming a triangle centered at R in counterclockwise order. This quantity is related to a discrete measure of the skyrmion number [118] and serves to distinguish topologically trivial and nontrivial magnetic phases in the low-temperature phase diagram.

3. Results

We show the stability of higher-order SkX by focusing on the interplay between the D 3 d -type anisotropic interaction I D 3 d and single-ion anisotropy A on the triangular lattice. First, we discuss the results at zero magnetic field in Section 3.1, where the higher-order SkX with the skyrmion number of two is relatively robust against the easy-axis single-ion anisotropy compared to the easy-plane one. Then, we discuss the field-induced phase transitions by introducing the magnetic field in Section 3.2.

3.1. Zero Magnetic Field

Figure 1 presents the low-temperature phase diagram obtained by the simulated annealing at the zero magnetic field ( H = 0 ), which reveals how the interplay between the single-ion anisotropy A and the D 3 d -type anisotropy I D 3 d governs the emergence of distinct magnetic phases. A prominent feature is the stabilization of the higher-order SkX with the skyrmion number of two (SkX-2) in a broad region at intermediate and large I D 3 d [58]. In contrast, smaller I D 3 d values favor a double-Q (2Q) phase, and for weak I D 3 d combined with strong | A | , the system stabilizes a single-Q (1Q) spiral phase. These results demonstrate that the D 3 d -type anisotropy plays a key role in stabilizing noncoplanar multiple-Q states, while the single-ion anisotropy modulates the degree of spin canting and the spatial structure in magnetic phases.
In the absence of the single-ion anisotropy ( A = 0 ), the SkX-2 state emerges as a robust ground state for I D 3 d 0.1 . The real-space spin configuration in the case of I D 3 d = 0.3 in Figure 2(a) exhibits a periodic triangular array of swirling textures, each magnetic unit cell containing two inequivalent vortex cores with different topological winding senses. The color scale represents S i z , where red and blue correspond to spins pointing up and down, respectively, while the arrows indicate the in-plane components forming a swirling vortex pattern. This configuration comprises two types of vortices: vortices centered at S i z = + 1 with the vorticity + 1 , and antivortices centered at S i z = 1 with the vorticity 2 . The asymmetry between their populations results in a net topological charge of n sk = 2 per magnetic unit cell. Such a composite topological texture arises from the phase-locked sinusoidal superposition of three spin density waves with propagation ordering wave vectors Q 1 , Q 2 , and Q 3 , which are mutually separated by 120 [84]. The scalar spin chirality map in Figure 3(a) shows a uniform hexagonal array of positive χ R sc , corresponding to the vortex and antivortex centers. The overall positive average of χ R sc indicates a nontrivial topological state; it is noted that the state with the opposite sign of the scalar spin chirality has the same energy. The spin structure factor in Figure 4(a) displays sharp Bragg peaks at all three Q ν positions in both the in-plane and out-of-plane components, confirming that this higher-order SkX arises from the coherent superposition of triple-Q modulations. This spin configuration spontaneously shows a nonzero averaged magnetization, M z 0 , which arises from a triple-Q sinusoidal superposition, even at zero magnetic field.
When the single-ion anisotropy A is introduced, the SkX-2 state continuously evolves without changing its topological character over a wide range of parameters. For the easy-axis case ( A > 0 ), as shown in Figure 2(b), the spins acquire stronger out-of-plane polarization, leading to a more pronounced z-spin modulation. According to the development of collinear tendency, the local scalar spin chirality becomes smaller, as shown in Figure 3(b). The spin structure factor correspondingly displays an increased amplitude in the out-of-plane components at the Q ν points, while the in-plane components are slightly suppressed, as shown in Figure 4(b). In contrast, for the easy-plane case ( A < 0 ), the out-of-plane spin component is reduced, while the in-plane spin component is enhanced, as shown by both the real-space and momentum-space plots in Figure 2(c) and Figure 4(c). Such a change has less influence on the local scalar spin chirality, as shown in Figure 3(c).
The systematic evolution of these quantities is summarized in Figure 5. As shown in Figure 5(a), the total magnetization M z tends to increase gradually with A; there is a kink structure around A 0.2 . The scalar spin chirality χ sc in Figure 5(b) exhibits a dome-like variation, which is maximized around A 0.2 . For the easy-axis anisotropy, χ sc is rapidly suppressed owing to the collinear tendency of the internal spin configuration. The Fourier amplitudes of in-plane and out-of-plane components in Figure 5(c) and Figure 5(d) show opposite trends with respect to A, which is understood from the role of the single-ion anisotrpy; A > 0 tends to favor the z-directional oscillations, while A < 0 tends to favor the x y -plane oscillations. These results clearly demonstrate that the degree of the easy-axis and easy-plane single-ion anisotropy continuously tunes the spin canting angle and the noncoplanarity in the SkX-2 phase while keeping the skyrmion number.
A particularly remarkable effect of the single-ion anisotropy appears in the spatial position of the skyrmion cores [119]. In the easy-plane regime ( A < 0 ), the skyrmion cores are located at interstitial sites of the triangular lattice, i.e., at the centers of the triangle plaquettes, as shown in Figure 2(c). With increasing A, the skyrmion cores shift toward the lattice sites, and in the easy-axis regime ( A > 0 ), they become centered directly on the atomic positions, as shown in Figure 2(b). This crossover from interstitial to on-site positions is discontinuous, taking place around A 0.2 , where the kink structure appears in the magnetization shown in Figure 5(a), indicating the modification of the underlying multiple-Q interference pattern.
For weaker D 3 d -type anisotropy, the SkX-2 phase becomes unstable and gives way to simpler magnetic structures. At I D 3 d = 0.08 with small single-ion anisotropy, a double-Q state emerges, as indicated in Figure 2(d), Figure 3(d), and Figure 4(d). In this phase, two symmetry-related ordering wave vectors dominate the spin structure, producing a noncoplanar but spatially anisotropic pattern with density waves in terms of the scalar spin chirality. In contrast to the SkX-2 phase, this phase does not show the averaged scalar spin chirality in the whole system. Upon increasing | A | , single-Q spiral phases become stabilized. When the anisotropy is easy-axis, the spiral is of the vertical type, characterized by spin rotations mainly along the perpendicular plane to the x y plane, whose real-space and momentum-space spin quantities are shown in Figure 2(e) and Figure 4(e), respectively. Meanwhile, for the easy-plane case, a conical spiral wave develops, in which spins mainly lies in an in-plane, although the z-spin modulation is weak but finite owing to the presence of the D 3 d -type anisotropy, as shown in Figure 2(f) and Figure 4(f). These results indicate that the D 3 d -type anisotropy is essential for stabilizing triple-Q SkX at zero magnetic field, while the single-ion anisotropy continuously tunes the balance between in-plane and out-of-plane spin modulations, controlling the noncoplanarity and the position of the skyrmion cores.

3.2. Nonzero Magnetic Fields

Next, we investigate the influence of an external magnetic field on the ground-state spin configurations discussed in the previous section and demonstrate a variety of field-induced phase transitions across four representative parameter sets.

3.2.1. Weak D 3 d -Type and Easy-Axis Anisotropies

We consider the case of weak D 3 d -type anisotropy under an easy-axis single-ion anisotropy, corresponding to I D 3 d = 0.1 and A = 0.3 , when the out-of-plane magnetic field H is applied. At zero magnetic field, the system forms the single-Q state without the net scalar spin chirality. By increasing the magnetic field, the single-Q state turns into the SkX-2 with the jumps of the magnetization [Figure 6(a)] and the scalar spin chirality [Figure 6(b)]. Although the Fourier amplitudes of the magnetic moments at Q 1 Q 3 change in this state for 0.15 H 0.65 , as shown in Figure 6(c) and Figure 6(d), the real-space spin configurations are almost the same, as shown in Figure 7(a)–Figure 7(d). The slight difference found in the position of the skyrmion core, which is located at the lattice (interstitial) site for small (large) H. This result indicates that the SkX-2 can appear even for small D 3 d -type anisotropy when the external magnetic field is applied.
As the magnetic field is further increased to H 0.65 , the system undergoes a topological transition from the SkX with the skyrmion number of two to another SkX with the skyrmion number of one, followed by a topologically trivial multiple-Q state. The real-space snapshots in Figure 7(e) and Figure 7(f) show that the core position of S i z < 0 changes from the vortex with the vorticity 2 to that with the vorticity 1. This results in the reduction of the skyrmion number from two to one in the magnetic unit cell. Indeed, this transition is accompanied by a sudden drop in χ sc , as shown in Figure 6(b). Finally, the SkX with the skyrmion number of one changes into the topologically trivial triple-Q state without the skyrmion number. In this way, the topological transitions in terms of the skyrmion number occur as 0 2 1 0 in this parameter region.

3.2.2. Weak D 3 d -Type and Easy-Plane Anisotropies

Next, we discuss the magnetic-field evolution for the case of weak D 3 d -type anisotropy under an easy-plane single-ion anisotropy, corresponding to I D 3 d = 0.1 and A = 0.3 , where a coplanar single-Q spiral state is the ground state at zero magnetic field. Upon applying a small out-of-plane magnetic field, the magnetization is gradually developed, as shown in Figure 8(a), while the scalar spin chirality remains zero in the whole H region, as shown in Figure 8(b). This indicates that the topologically nontrivial spin configuration, i.e., SkX, does not appear in the case of the easy-plane single-ion anisotropy for weak D 3 d -type anisotropy.
Meanwhile, one finds that the single-Q spiral state changes into the triple-Q state close to the saturation magnetic field, as shown in Figure 8(c) and Figure 8(d). The spin configuration of this triple-Q state is characterized by the periodic alignment of vortex and antivortex without the z-spin oscillations, whose real-space spin configuration is presented in Figure 9; no net scalar spin chirality emerges in this state. A similar triple-Q state has also been found in other spin models, where the frustrated competing interactions play an important role [54,120].

3.2.3. Strong D 3 d -Type and Easy-Axis Anisotropies

Next, we discuss the situation with strong D 3 d -type anisotropy, I D 3 d = 0.3 . In the case of the easy-axis single-ion anisotropy at A = 0.3 , the zero-field state corresponds to the SkX-2. The SkX-2 phase is robust against the external magnetic field up to H 1.3 , which is in contrast to the weak D 3 d -type anisotropy with I D 3 d = 0.1 . The spin configuration of the SkX-2 smoothly changes by increasing the magnetic field, as found by the behaviors of the magnetization in Figure 10(a) and the scalar spin chirality in Figure 10(b). For the small magnetic field around H 0.2 , the intensities of magnetic moments at Q 1 Q 3 are inequivalent, as shown in Figure 10(c) and Figure 10(d), although their real-space spin configurations are almost the same, as shown in Figure 11(a) and Figure 11(b), indicating the same topological property irrespective of H.
By further increasing the magnetic field, the SkX-2 turns into the SkX with the skyrmion number of one at H 1.3 , similar to the case of I D 3 d = 0.1 . The real-space spin configuration in Figure 11(c) resembles that in Figure 7(e). The SkX with the skyrmion number of one finally turns into the fully polarized state with a clear jump of all the physical quantities in Figure 10. Thus, the strong D 3 d -type anisotropy tends to favor the SkX-2 even under the magnetic field, and the topological transition between the SkXs with different skyrmion numbers is commonly found in the case of the easy-axis single-ion anisotropy.

3.2.4. Strong D 3 d -Type and Easy-Plane Anisotropies

Finally, we discuss the case of strong D 3 d -type anisotropy under an easy-plane single-ion anisotropy, corresponding to I D 3 d = 0.3 and A = 0.3 , when the out-of-plane magnetic field H is applied. At zero magnetic field, the SkX-2 is stabilized, where the finite scalar spin chirality is present. As the magnetic field increases, the spins tend to align the magnetic-field direction in a gradual way while keeping the triple-Q spin configuration with equal intensities as shown in Figure 12(c) and Figure 12(d). Such a gradual change of the spin configuration is found in the continuous change of the magnetization in Figure 12(a) and the scalar spin chirality in Figure 12(b). The real-space spin configurations for different values of H are shown in Figure 13(a), Figure 13(b), and Figure 13(c), where the sign of S i z in the skyrmion core around S i z = 1 at zero field is reversed while increasing the magnetic field. Thus, the topological phase transition occurs in the intermediate field, although the spin and scalar spin chirality quantities show a continuous change. Such a field-induced change of the spin configuration is clearly different from that for the easy-axis single-ion anisotropy, the latter of which shows a clear phase transition from the SkX-2 to the SkX with the skyrmion number of one.

4. Conclusions

We have theoretically investigated the emergence and stability of higher-order SkX in centrosymmetric magnets with the trigonal D 3 d symmetry by systematically analyzing the effects of the single-ion anisotropy and the anisotropic exchange interaction that arises from the D 3 d symmetry. Using real-space simulated annealing calculations of a classical spin model on the two-dimensional triangular lattice, we constructed comprehensive phase diagrams at both zero and finite magnetic fields and clarified the microscopic mechanisms responsible for stabilizing nontrivial multiple-Q topological spin textures.
At zero magnetic field, we demonstrated that the cooperative interplay between the D 3 d -type magnetic anisotropy and the single-ion anisotropy gives rise to a higher-order SkX with the skyrmion number of two. This SkX phase emerges as a robust ground state in a wide parameter range of both parameters. We also showed that the position of the skyrmion core undergoes a crossover from on-site to interstitial with changing the degree of single-ion anisotropy, indicating the sensitivity of the real-space spin texture to local anisotropic terms. Under finite magnetic fields, a series of field-induced topological transitions was observed. For both weak and strong D 3 d -type anisotropies, the system exhibits a sequential evolution of spin textures as 2 1 0 in terms of the skyrmion number under the easy-axis single-ion anisotropy. The SkX with the skyrmion number of two remains remarkably stable over a wide field range, particularly in the presence of strong D 3 d -type anisotropy. In contrast, under easy-plane anisotropy, the higher-order SkX only appears for the strong D 3 d -type anisotropy, which turns into the topologically trivial triple-Q state without the skyrmion number. These results indicate that the D 3 d -type anisotropy is essential for the formation and stability of higher-order SkXs, while the single-ion anisotropy affects the topological phase transitions driven by the magnetic field. Our findings provide microscopic insight into the stabilization mechanism of higher-order SkXs in centrosymmetric trigonal magnets, suggesting that the interplay between local and momentum-resolved anisotropies can realize complex noncoplanar spin textures even in the absence of the DM interaction.

Funding

This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grants Numbers JP21H01037, JP22H00101, JP22H01183, JP23H04869, JP23K03288, JP23K20827, and by JST CREST (JPMJCR23O4) and JST FOREST (JPMJFR2366).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Skyrme, T. A non-linear field theory. Proc. Roy. Soc 1961, 260, 127. [Google Scholar]
  2. Skyrme, T.H.R. A unified field theory of mesons and baryons. Nucl. Phys. 1962, 31, 556–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bogdanov, A.N.; Yablonskii, D.A. Thermodynamically stable “vortices" in magnetically ordered crystals: The mixed state of magnets. Sov. Phys. JETP 1989, 68, 101. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bogdanov, A.; Hubert, A. Thermodynamically stable magnetic vortex states in magnetic crystals. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1994, 138, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fert, A.; Cros, V.; Sampaio, J. Skyrmions on the track. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nagaosa, N.; Tokura, Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 899–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kang, W.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, W. Skyrmion-electronics: An overview and outlook. Proc. IEEE 2016, 104, 2040–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Finocchio, G.; Büttner, F.; Tomasello, R.; Carpentieri, M.; Kläui, M. Magnetic skyrmions: from fundamental to applications. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2016, 49, 423001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fert, A.; Reyren, N.; Cros, V. Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Song, K.M.; Park, T.E.; Xia, J.; Ezawa, M.; Liu, X.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, G.; Woo, S. Skyrmion-electronics: writing, deleting, reading and processing magnetic skyrmions toward spintronic applications. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2020, 32, 143001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bogdanov, A.N.; Panagopoulos, C. Physical foundations and basic properties of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2020, 2, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tokura, Y.; Kanazawa, N. Magnetic Skyrmion Materials. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Reichhardt, C.; Reichhardt, C.J.O.; Milošević, M.V. Statics and dynamics of skyrmions interacting with disorder and nanostructures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2022, 94, 035005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ohgushi, K.; Murakami, S.; Nagaosa, N. Spin anisotropy and quantum Hall effect in the kagomé lattice: Chiral spin state based on a ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 62, R6065–R6068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Taguchi, Y.; Oohara, Y.; Yoshizawa, H.; Nagaosa, N.; Tokura, Y. Spin chirality, Berry phase, and anomalous Hall effect in a frustrated ferromagnet. Science 2001, 291, 2573–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tatara, G.; Kawamura, H. Chirality-driven anomalous Hall effect in weak coupling regime. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2002, 71, 2613–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Neubauer, A.; Pfleiderer, C.; Binz, B.; Rosch, A.; Ritz, R.; Niklowitz, P.G.; Böni, P. Topological Hall Effect in the A Phase of MnSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 186602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hamamoto, K.; Ezawa, M.; Nagaosa, N. Quantized topological Hall effect in skyrmion crystal. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 115417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nakazawa, K.; Bibes, M.; Kohno, H. Topological Hall effect from strong to weak coupling. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2018, 87, 033705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tai, L.; Dai, B.; Li, J.; Huang, H.; Chong, S.K.; Wong, K.L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, P.; Deng, P.; Eckberg, C.; et al. Distinguishing the two-component anomalous Hall effect from the topological Hall effect. ACS nano 2022, 16, 17336–17346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sampaio, J.; Cros, V.; Rohart, S.; Thiaville, A.; Fert, A. Nucleation, stability and current-induced motion of isolated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Romming, N.; Hanneken, C.; Menzel, M.; Bickel, J.E.; Wolter, B.; von Bergmann, K.; Kubetzka, A.; Wiesendanger, R. Writing and deleting single magnetic skyrmions. Science 2013, 341, 636–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Osorio, S.A.; Sturla, M.B.; Rosales, H.D.; Cabra, D.C. Stability of skyrmions in perturbed ferromagnetic chiral magnets. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 99, 064439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, K.; Bheemarasetty, V.; Duan, J.; Zhou, S.; Xiao, G. Fundamental physics and applications of skyrmions: A review. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2022, 563, 169905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sarmiento, C.V.; Guimarães, A.P. Analysis of stability and transition dynamics of skyrmions and skyrmioniums in ferromagnetic nanodisks: A micromagnetic study at finite temperature. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 110, 064437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dzyaloshinsky, I. A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1958, 4, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moriya, T. Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. 1960, 120, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rößler, U.K.; Bogdanov, A.N.; Pfleiderer, C. Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals. Nature 2006, 442, 797–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Binz, B.; Vishwanath, A.; Aji, V. Theory of the Helical Spin Crystal: A Candidate for the Partially Ordered State of MnSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 207202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Binz, B.; Vishwanath, A. Theory of helical spin crystals: Phases, textures, and properties. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 214408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Binz, B.; Vishwanath, A. Chirality induced anomalous-Hall effect in helical spin crystals. Physica B 2008, 403, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yi, S.D.; Onoda, S.; Nagaosa, N.; Han, J.H. Skyrmions and anomalous Hall effect in a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya spiral magnet. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 054416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Heinze, S.; von Bergmann, K.; Menzel, M.; Brede, J.; Kubetzka, A.; Wiesendanger, R.; Bihlmayer, G.; Blügel, S. Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions. Nat. Phys. 2011, 7, 713–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mühlbauer, S.; Binz, B.; Jonietz, F.; Pfleiderer, C.; Rosch, A.; Neubauer, A.; Georgii, R.; Böni, P. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Science 2009, 323, 915–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Adams, T.; Mühlbauer, S.; Pfleiderer, C.; Jonietz, F.; Bauer, A.; Neubauer, A.; Georgii, R.; Böni, P.; Keiderling, U.; Everschor, K.; et al. Long-Range Crystalline Nature of the Skyrmion Lattice in MnSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 217206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Morikawa, D.; Shibata, K.; Kanazawa, N.; Yu, X.Z.; Tokura, Y. Crystal chirality and skyrmion helicity in MnSi and (Fe, Co)Si as determined by transmission electron microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 024408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bauer, A.; Garst, M.; Pfleiderer, C. Specific Heat of the Skyrmion Lattice Phase and Field-Induced Tricritical Point in MnSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 177207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wilson, M.N.; Butenko, A.B.; Bogdanov, A.N.; Monchesky, T.L. Chiral skyrmions in cubic helimagnet films: The role of uniaxial anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, 094411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yu, X.Z.; Onose, Y.; Kanazawa, N.; Park, J.H.; Han, J.H.; Matsui, Y.; Nagaosa, N.; Tokura, Y. Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal. Nature 2010, 465, 901–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Adams, T.; Mühlbauer, S.; Neubauer, A.; Münzer, W.; Jonietz, F.; Georgii, R.; Pedersen, B.; Böni, P.; Rosch, A.; Pfleiderer, C. Skyrmion lattice domains in Fe1-xCoxSi. Proceedings of the J. Phys. Conf. Ser. IOP Publishing 2010, 200, 032001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Münzer, W.; Neubauer, A.; Adams, T.; Mühlbauer, S.; Franz, C.; Jonietz, F.; Georgii, R.; Böni, P.; Pedersen, B.; Schmidt, M.; et al. Skyrmion lattice in the doped semiconductor Fe1-xCoxSi. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 041203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bauer, A.; Garst, M.; Pfleiderer, C. History dependence of the magnetic properties of single-crystal Fe1-xCoxSi. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 235144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yu, X.Z.; Kanazawa, N.; Onose, Y.; Kimoto, K.; Zhang, W.; Ishiwata, S.; Matsui, Y.; Tokura, Y. Near room-temperature formation of a skyrmion crystal in thin-films of the helimagnet FeGe. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lebech, B.; Bernhard, J.; Freltoft, T. Magnetic structures of cubic FeGe studied by small-angle neutron scattering. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1989, 1, 6105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Seki, S.; Yu, X.Z.; Ishiwata, S.; Tokura, Y. Observation of skyrmions in a multiferroic material. Science 2012, 336, 198–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Adams, T.; Chacon, A.; Wagner, M.; Bauer, A.; Brandl, G.; Pedersen, B.; Berger, H.; Lemmens, P.; Pfleiderer, C. Long-Wavelength Helimagnetic Order and Skyrmion Lattice Phase in Cu2OSeO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 237204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Seki, S.; Kim, J.H.; Inosov, D.S.; Georgii, R.; Keimer, B.; Ishiwata, S.; Tokura, Y. Formation and rotation of skyrmion crystal in the chiral-lattice insulator Cu2OSeO3. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 220406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kurumaji, T.; Nakajima, T.; Ukleev, V.; Feoktystov, A.; Arima, T.h.; Kakurai, K.; Tokura, Y. Néel-Type Skyrmion Lattice in the Tetragonal Polar Magnet VOSe2O5. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 237201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kuo, T.W.; Chen, C.C.; Kakarla, D.C.; Tiwari, A.; Wang, C.W.; Gooch, M.; Deng, L.Z.; Chu, C.W.; Yang, H.D.; Wu, H.C. Enhanced Néel-type skyrmion stability in polar VOSe2O5 through tunable magnetic anisotropy under pressure. Phys. Rev. B 2025, 112, 024441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Okubo, T.; Chung, S.; Kawamura, H. Multiple-q States and the Skyrmion Lattice of the Triangular-Lattice Heisenberg Antiferromagnet under Magnetic Fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 017206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Hayami, S.; Yambe, R. Stabilization mechanisms of magnetic skyrmion crystal and multiple-Q states based on momentum-resolved spin interactions. Mater. Today Quantum 2024, 3, 100010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kawamura, H. Frustration-induced skyrmion crystals in centrosymmetric magnets. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2025, 37, 183004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Leonov, A.O.; Mostovoy, M. Multiply periodic states and isolated skyrmions in an anisotropic frustrated magnet. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hayami, S.; Lin, S.Z.; Kamiya, Y.; Batista, C.D. Vortices, skyrmions, and chirality waves in frustrated Mott insulators with a quenched periodic array of impurities. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 174420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Utesov, O.I. Thermodynamically stable skyrmion lattice in a tetragonal frustrated antiferromagnet with dipolar interaction. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 064414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Utesov, O.I. Mean-field description of skyrmion lattice in hexagonal frustrated antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 105, 054435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hayami, S. Skyrmion crystal and spiral phases in centrosymmetric bilayer magnets with staggered Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 105, 014408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yambe, R.; Hayami, S. Effective spin model in momentum space: Toward a systematic understanding of multiple-Q instability by momentum-resolved anisotropic exchange interactions. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 106, 174437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Saha, S.R.; Sugawara, H.; Matsuda, T.D.; Sato, H.; Mallik, R.; Sampathkumaran, E.V. Magnetic anisotropy, first-order-like metamagnetic transitions, and large negative magnetoresistance in single-crystal Gd2PdSi3. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60, 12162–12165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kurumaji, T.; Nakajima, T.; Hirschberger, M.; Kikkawa, A.; Yamasaki, Y.; Sagayama, H.; Nakao, H.; Taguchi, Y.; Arima, T.h.; Tokura, Y. Skyrmion lattice with a giant topological Hall effect in a frustrated triangular-lattice magnet. Science 2019, 365, 914–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hirschberger, M.; Spitz, L.; Nomoto, T.; Kurumaji, T.; Gao, S.; Masell, J.; Nakajima, T.; Kikkawa, A.; Yamasaki, Y.; Sagayama, H.; et al. Topological Nernst Effect of the Two-Dimensional Skyrmion Lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125, 076602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kumar, R.; Iyer, K.K.; Paulose, P.L.; Sampathkumaran, E.V. Magnetic and transport anomalies in R2RhSi34pt0ex(R=Gd, Tb, and Dy) resembling those of the exotic magnetic material Gd2PdSi3. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 144440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Spachmann, S.; Elghandour, A.; Frontzek, M.; Löser, W.; Klingeler, R. Magnetoelastic coupling and phases in the skyrmion lattice magnet Gd2PdSi3 discovered by high-resolution dilatometry. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 184424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nakamura, S.; Kabeya, N.; Kobayashi, M.; Araki, K.; Katoh, K.; Ochiai, A. Spin trimer formation in the metallic compound Gd3Ru4Al12 with a distorted kagome lattice structure. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 054410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hirschberger, M.; Nakajima, T.; Gao, S.; Peng, L.; Kikkawa, A.; Kurumaji, T.; Kriener, M.; Yamasaki, Y.; Sagayama, H.; Nakao, H.; et al. Skyrmion phase and competing magnetic orders on a breathing kagome lattice. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hirschberger, M.; Hayami, S.; Tokura, Y. Nanometric skyrmion lattice from anisotropic exchange interactions in a centrosymmetric host. New J. Phys. 2021, 23, 023039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nakamura, S. Magnetic anisotropies and skyrmion lattice related to magnetic quadrupole interactions of the RKKY mechanism in the frustrated spin-trimer system Gd3Ru4Al12 with a breathing kagome structure. Phys. Rev. B 2025, 111, 184433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Khanh, N.D.; Nakajima, T.; Yu, X.; Gao, S.; Shibata, K.; Hirschberger, M.; Yamasaki, Y.; Sagayama, H.; Nakao, H.; Peng, L.; et al. Nanometric square skyrmion lattice in a centrosymmetric tetragonal magnet. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Matsuyama, N.; Nomura, T.; Imajo, S.; Nomoto, T.; Arita, R.; Sudo, K.; Kimata, M.; Khanh, N.D.; Takagi, R.; Tokura, Y.; et al. Quantum oscillations in the centrosymmetric skyrmion-hosting magnet GdRu2Si2. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107, 104421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wood, G.D.A.; Khalyavin, D.D.; Mayoh, D.A.; Bouaziz, J.; Hall, A.E.; Holt, S.J.R.; Orlandi, F.; Manuel, P.; Blügel, S.; Staunton, J.B.; et al. Double-Q ground state with topological charge stripes in the centrosymmetric skyrmion candidate GdRu2Si2. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107, L180402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Eremeev, S.; Glazkova, D.; Poelchen, G.; Kraiker, A.; Ali, K.; Tarasov, A.V.; Schulz, S.; Kliemt, K.; Chulkov, E.V.; Stolyarov, V.; et al. Insight into the electronic structure of the centrosymmetric skyrmion magnet GdRu2Si2. Nanoscale Adv. 2023, 5, 6678–6687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Ezawa, M. High-topological-number magnetic skyrmions and topologically protected dissipative structure. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 024415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ozawa, R.; Hayami, S.; Motome, Y. Zero-Field Skyrmions with a High Topological Number in Itinerant Magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 147205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Amoroso, D.; Barone, P.; Picozzi, S. Spontaneous skyrmionic lattice from anisotropic symmetric exchange in a Ni-halide monolayer. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Honda, S.; Tsuzuki, H.; Itoh, H.; Ohsawa, T. Magnetic structure of high-order skyrmion number produced in a nanodisk via micromagnetic simulation with long-range dipole-dipole interaction. Phys. Rev. B 2025, 112, 064417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hayami, S.; Okubo, T.; Motome, Y. Phase shift in skyrmion crystals. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Eto, R.; Pohle, R.; Mochizuki, M. Low-Energy Excitations of Skyrmion Crystals in a Centrosymmetric Kondo-Lattice Magnet: Decoupled Spin-Charge Excitations and Nonreciprocity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 129, 017201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hayami, S.; Yatsushiro, M. Nonlinear nonreciprocal transport in antiferromagnets free from spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 106, 014420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hayami, S.; Motome, Y. Effect of magnetic anisotropy on skyrmions with a high topological number in itinerant magnets. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 99, 094420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hayami, S. Multiple-Q magnetism by anisotropic bilinear-biquadratic interactions in momentum space. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2020, 513, 167181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hayami, S. Multiple skyrmion crystal phases by itinerant frustration in centrosymmetric tetragonal magnets. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2022, 91, 023705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hayami, S.; Motome, Y. Noncoplanar multiple-Q spin textures by itinerant frustration: Effects of single-ion anisotropy and bond-dependent anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 054422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, Z.; Su, Y.; Lin, S.Z.; Batista, C.D. Meron, skyrmion, and vortex crystals in centrosymmetric tetragonal magnets. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 104408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yambe, R.; Hayami, S. Skyrmion crystals in centrosymmetric itinerant magnets without horizontal mirror plane. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Butenko, A.B.; Leonov, A.A.; Rößler, U.K.; Bogdanov, A.N. Stabilization of skyrmion textures by uniaxial distortions in noncentrosymmetric cubic helimagnets. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 052403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lin, S.Z.; Saxena, A.; Batista, C.D. Skyrmion fractionalization and merons in chiral magnets with easy-plane anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 224407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Leonov, A.O.; Monchesky, T.L.; Romming, N.; Kubetzka, A.; Bogdanov, A.N.; Wiesendanger, R. The properties of isolated chiral skyrmions in thin magnetic films. New. J. Phys. 2016, 18, 065003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Leonov, A.O.; Kézsmárki, I. Asymmetric isolated skyrmions in polar magnets with easy-plane anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 014423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hayami, S. In-plane magnetic field-induced skyrmion crystal in frustrated magnets with easy-plane anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 224418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Day, P.; Moore, M.W.; Wilkinson, C.; Ziebeck, K.R.A. Neutron diffraction study of the incommensurate magnetic phase of Ni0.92Zn0.08Br2. J. Phys. C: Solid State Physics 1981, 14, 3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Regnault, L.; Rossat-Mignod, J.; Adam, A.; Billerey, D.; Terrier, C. Inelastic neutron scattering investigation of the magnetic excitations in the helimagnetic state of NiBr2. Journal de Physique 1982, 43, 1283–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Nakatsuji, S.; Nambu, Y.; Tonomura, H.; Sakai, O.; Jonas, S.; Broholm, C.; Tsunetsugu, H.; Qiu, Y.; Maeno, Y. Spin disorder on a triangular lattice. Science 2005, 309, 1697–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Ghimire, N.; Ronning, F.; Williams, D.; Scott, B.; Luo, Y.; Thompson, J.; Bauer, E. Investigation of the physical properties of the tetragonal CeMAl4Si2 (M= Rh, Ir, Pt) compounds. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2014, 27, 025601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ruderman, M.A.; Kittel, C. Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons. Phys. Rev. 1954, 96, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kasuya, T. A Theory of Metallic Ferro- and Antiferromagnetism on Zener’s Model. Prog. Theor. Phys. 1956, 16, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Yosida, K. Magnetic Properties of Cu-Mn Alloys. Phys. Rev. 1957, 106, 893–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, Z.; Su, Y.; Lin, S.Z.; Batista, C.D. Skyrmion Crystal from RKKY Interaction Mediated by 2D Electron Gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 207201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yoshimori, A. A new type of antiferromagnetic structure in the rutile type crystal. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1959, 14, 807–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kaplan, T.A. Some Effects of Anisotropy on Spiral Spin-Configurations with Application to Rare-Earth Metals. Phys. Rev. 1961, 124, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Elliott, R.J. Phenomenological Discussion of Magnetic Ordering in the Heavy Rare-Earth Metals. Phys. Rev. 1961, 124, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kakihana, M.; Aoki, D.; Nakamura, A.; Honda, F.; Nakashima, M.; Amako, Y.; Nakamura, S.; Sakakibara, T.; Hedo, M.; Nakama, T.; et al. Giant Hall resistivity and magnetoresistance in cubic chiral antiferromagnet EuPtSi. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2018, 87, 023701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kaneko, K.; Frontzek, M.D.; Matsuda, M.; Nakao, A.; Munakata, K.; Ohhara, T.; Kakihana, M.; Haga, Y.; Hedo, M.; Nakama, T.; et al. Unique Helical Magnetic Order and Field-Induced Phase in Trillium Lattice Antiferromagnet EuPtSi. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2019, 88, 013702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tabata, C.; Matsumura, T.; Nakao, H.; Michimura, S.; Kakihana, M.; Inami, T.; Kaneko, K.; Hedo, M.; Nakama, T.; Ōnuki, Y. Magnetic Field Induced Triple-q Magnetic Order in Trillium Lattice Antiferromagnet EuPtSi Studied by Resonant X-ray Scattering. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2019, 88, 093704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kakihana, M.; Aoki, D.; Nakamura, A.; Honda, F.; Nakashima, M.; Amako, Y.; Takeuchi, T.; Harima, H.; Hedo, M.; Nakama, T.; et al. Unique Magnetic Phases in the Skyrmion Lattice and Fermi Surface Properties in Cubic Chiral Antiferromagnet EuPtSi. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2019, 88, 094705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Mishra, A.K.; Ganesan, V. A-phase, field-induced tricritical point, and universal magnetocaloric scaling in EuPtSi. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100, 125113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Takeuchi, T.; Kakihana, M.; Hedo, M.; Nakama, T.; Ōnuki, Y. Magnetic field versus temperature phase diagram for H‖[001] in the trillium lattice antiferromagnet EuPtSi. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2019, 88, 053703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Matsumura, T.; Tabata, C.; Kaneko, K.; Nakao, H.; Kakihana, M.; Hedo, M.; Nakama, T.; Ōnuki, Y. Single helicity of the triple-q triangular skyrmion lattice state in the cubic chiral helimagnet EuPtSi. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 109, 174437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Matsumura, T.; Kurauchi, K.; Tsukagoshi, M.; Higa, N.; Nakao, H.; Kakihana, M.; Hedo, M.; Nakama, T.; Ōnuki, Y. Helicity Unification by Triangular Skyrmion Lattice Formation in the Noncentrosymmetric Tetragonal Magnet EuNiGe3. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2024, 93, 074705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Takagi, R.; White, J.; Hayami, S.; Arita, R.; Honecker, D.; Rønnow, H.; Tokura, Y.; Seki, S. Multiple-q noncollinear magnetism in an itinerant hexagonal magnet. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaau3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Hayami, S.; Yambe, R. Field-Direction Sensitive Skyrmion Crystals in Cubic Chiral Systems: Implication to 4f-Electron Compound EuPtSi. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2021, 90, 073705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Singh, D.; Fujishiro, Y.; Hayami, S.; Moody, S.H.; Nomoto, T.; Baral, P.R.; Ukleev, V.; Cubitt, R.; Steinke, N.J.; Gawryluk, D.J.; et al. Transition between distinct hybrid skyrmion textures through their hexagonal-to-square crystal transformation in a polar magnet. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 8050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kaplan, T. Single-band Hubbard model with spin-orbit coupling. Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter 1983, 49, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Shekhtman, L.; Aharony, A.; Entin-Wohlman, O. Bond-dependent symmetric and antisymmetric superexchange interactions in La2CuO4. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Khomskii, D.; Mostovoy, M. Orbital ordering and frustrations. J. Phys. A 2003, 36, 9197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Jackeli, G.; Khaliullin, G. Mott insulators in the strong spin-orbit coupling limit: From Heisenberg to a quantum compass and Kitaev models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 017205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Li, Y.D.; Wang, X.; Chen, G. Anisotropic spin model of strong spin-orbit-coupled triangular antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 035107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Maksimov, P.A.; Zhu, Z.; White, S.R.; Chernyshev, A.L. Anisotropic-Exchange Magnets on a Triangular Lattice: Spin Waves, Accidental Degeneracies, and Dual Spin Liquids. Phys. Rev. X 2019, 9, 021017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Berg, B.; Luscher, M. Definition and statistical distributions of a topological number in the lattice O(3) σ-model. Nucl. Phys. B 1981, 190, 412–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hayami, S.; Yambe, R. Locking of skyrmion cores on a centrosymmetric discrete lattice: Onsite versus offsite. Phys. Rev. Research 2021, 3, 043158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kamiya, Y.; Batista, C.D. Magnetic Vortex Crystals in Frustrated Mott Insulator. Phys. Rev. X 2014, 4, 011023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Magnetic phase diagram of the spin model in Eq. (1) at low temperatures. The horizontal and vertical axes stand for single-ion anisotropy, A, and D 3 d -type magnetic anisotropy, I D 3 d , respectively. 1Q, 2Q, and SkX-2 represent the single-Q state, the double-Q state, and SkX with the skyrmion number of two, respectively.
Figure 1. Magnetic phase diagram of the spin model in Eq. (1) at low temperatures. The horizontal and vertical axes stand for single-ion anisotropy, A, and D 3 d -type magnetic anisotropy, I D 3 d , respectively. 1Q, 2Q, and SkX-2 represent the single-Q state, the double-Q state, and SkX with the skyrmion number of two, respectively.
Preprints 190132 g001
Figure 2. Snapshots of the spin configurations in real space, which are obtained by simulated annealing. The data for (a)–(c) are shown for the skyrmion crystal with the skyrmion number of two at (a) A = 0 , (b) A = 0.5 , and (c) A = 0.5 for I D 3 d = 0.3 , those for (d) are shown for the double-Q state at A = 0.05 and I D 3 d = 0.08 , and those for (e) and (f) are shown for the single-Q state at (e) A = 0.5 and (f) A = 0.5 for I D 3 d = 0.06 . The arrows represent the direction of spins, and the color stands for the z-spin component.
Figure 2. Snapshots of the spin configurations in real space, which are obtained by simulated annealing. The data for (a)–(c) are shown for the skyrmion crystal with the skyrmion number of two at (a) A = 0 , (b) A = 0.5 , and (c) A = 0.5 for I D 3 d = 0.3 , those for (d) are shown for the double-Q state at A = 0.05 and I D 3 d = 0.08 , and those for (e) and (f) are shown for the single-Q state at (e) A = 0.5 and (f) A = 0.5 for I D 3 d = 0.06 . The arrows represent the direction of spins, and the color stands for the z-spin component.
Preprints 190132 g002
Figure 3. Snapshots of the scalar spin chirality configurations in real space, which are obtained by simulated annealing: (a) the skyrmion crystal with the skyrmion number of two at A = 0 and I D 3 d = 0.3 , (b) the skyrmion crystal with the skyrmion number of two at A = 0.5 and I D 3 d = 0.3 , (c) the skyrmion crystal with the skyrmion number of two at A = 0.5 and I D 3 d = 0.3 , and the double-Q state at A = 0.05 and I D 3 d = 0.08 .
Figure 3. Snapshots of the scalar spin chirality configurations in real space, which are obtained by simulated annealing: (a) the skyrmion crystal with the skyrmion number of two at A = 0 and I D 3 d = 0.3 , (b) the skyrmion crystal with the skyrmion number of two at A = 0.5 and I D 3 d = 0.3 , (c) the skyrmion crystal with the skyrmion number of two at A = 0.5 and I D 3 d = 0.3 , and the double-Q state at A = 0.05 and I D 3 d = 0.08 .
Preprints 190132 g003
Figure 4. Square root of the spin structure factor in each magnetic phase corresponding to Figure 2: the skyrmion crystal with the skyrmion number of two at (a) A = 0 , (b) A = 0.5 , and (c) A = 0.5 for I D 3 d = 0.3 , those for (d) are shown for the double-Q state at A = 0.05 and I D 3 d = 0.08 , and those for (e) and (f) are shown for the single-Q state at (e) A = 0.5 and (f) A = 0.5 for I D 3 d = 0.06 . The left panel shows the in-plane spin component, and the right panel shows the out-of-plane spin component.
Figure 4. Square root of the spin structure factor in each magnetic phase corresponding to Figure 2: the skyrmion crystal with the skyrmion number of two at (a) A = 0 , (b) A = 0.5 , and (c) A = 0.5 for I D 3 d = 0.3 , those for (d) are shown for the double-Q state at A = 0.05 and I D 3 d = 0.08 , and those for (e) and (f) are shown for the single-Q state at (e) A = 0.5 and (f) A = 0.5 for I D 3 d = 0.06 . The left panel shows the in-plane spin component, and the right panel shows the out-of-plane spin component.
Preprints 190132 g004
Figure 5. A dependence of (a) the magnetization along the z direction, M z , (b) the scalar spin chirality, χ sc , (c) the squared in-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν x y ) 2 , and (d) the squared out-of-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν z ) 2 , at I D 3 d = 0.3 .
Figure 5. A dependence of (a) the magnetization along the z direction, M z , (b) the scalar spin chirality, χ sc , (c) the squared in-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν x y ) 2 , and (d) the squared out-of-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν z ) 2 , at I D 3 d = 0.3 .
Preprints 190132 g005
Figure 6. Magnetic field H dependence of (a) the magnetization along the z direction, M z , (b) the scalar spin chirality, χ sc , (c) the squared in-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν x y ) 2 , and (d) the squared out-of-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν z ) 2 , at I D 3 d = 0.1 and A = 0.3 .
Figure 6. Magnetic field H dependence of (a) the magnetization along the z direction, M z , (b) the scalar spin chirality, χ sc , (c) the squared in-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν x y ) 2 , and (d) the squared out-of-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν z ) 2 , at I D 3 d = 0.1 and A = 0.3 .
Preprints 190132 g006
Figure 7. Snapshots of the spin configurations in real space at (a) H = 0.15 , (b) H = 0.2 , (c) H = 0.4 , (d) H = 0.6 , (e) H = 0.9 , and (f) H = 1.1 . The arrows represent the direction of spins, and the color stands for the z-spin component.
Figure 7. Snapshots of the spin configurations in real space at (a) H = 0.15 , (b) H = 0.2 , (c) H = 0.4 , (d) H = 0.6 , (e) H = 0.9 , and (f) H = 1.1 . The arrows represent the direction of spins, and the color stands for the z-spin component.
Preprints 190132 g007
Figure 8. Magnetic field H dependence of (a) the magnetization along the z direction, M z , (b) the scalar spin chirality, χ sc , (c) the squared in-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν x y ) 2 , and (d) the squared out-of-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν z ) 2 , at I D 3 d = 0.1 and A = 0.3 .
Figure 8. Magnetic field H dependence of (a) the magnetization along the z direction, M z , (b) the scalar spin chirality, χ sc , (c) the squared in-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν x y ) 2 , and (d) the squared out-of-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν z ) 2 , at I D 3 d = 0.1 and A = 0.3 .
Preprints 190132 g008
Figure 9. Snapshot of the spin configuration in real space at H = 2.5 . The arrows represent the direction of spins, and the color stands for the z-spin component.
Figure 9. Snapshot of the spin configuration in real space at H = 2.5 . The arrows represent the direction of spins, and the color stands for the z-spin component.
Preprints 190132 g009
Figure 10. Magnetic field H dependence of (a) the magnetization along the z direction, M z , (b) the scalar spin chirality, χ sc , (c) the squared in-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν x y ) 2 , and (d) the squared out-of-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν z ) 2 , at I D 3 d = 0.3 and A = 0.3 .
Figure 10. Magnetic field H dependence of (a) the magnetization along the z direction, M z , (b) the scalar spin chirality, χ sc , (c) the squared in-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν x y ) 2 , and (d) the squared out-of-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν z ) 2 , at I D 3 d = 0.3 and A = 0.3 .
Preprints 190132 g010
Figure 11. Snapshots of the spin configurations in real space at (a) H = 0.2 , (b) H = 0.6 , and (c) H = 1.4 . The arrows represent the direction of spins, and the color stands for the z-spin component.
Figure 11. Snapshots of the spin configurations in real space at (a) H = 0.2 , (b) H = 0.6 , and (c) H = 1.4 . The arrows represent the direction of spins, and the color stands for the z-spin component.
Preprints 190132 g011
Figure 12. Magnetic field H dependence of (a) the magnetization along the z direction, M z , (b) the scalar spin chirality, χ sc , (c) the squared in-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν x y ) 2 , and (d) the squared out-of-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν z ) 2 , at I D 3 d = 0.3 and A = 0.3 .
Figure 12. Magnetic field H dependence of (a) the magnetization along the z direction, M z , (b) the scalar spin chirality, χ sc , (c) the squared in-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν x y ) 2 , and (d) the squared out-of-plane magnetic moments at Q ν for ν = 1 –3, ( m Q ν z ) 2 , at I D 3 d = 0.3 and A = 0.3 .
Preprints 190132 g012
Figure 13. Snapshots of the spin configurations in real space at (a) H = 0.4 , (b) H = 1 , and (c) H = 2 . The arrows represent the direction of spins, and the color stands for the z-spin component.
Figure 13. Snapshots of the spin configurations in real space at (a) H = 0.4 , (b) H = 1 , and (c) H = 2 . The arrows represent the direction of spins, and the color stands for the z-spin component.
Preprints 190132 g013
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated