Submitted:
02 December 2025
Posted:
05 December 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
This is the first scientific report on the fruit characteristics of Chondrodendron tomentosum Ruiz & Pav. (Menispermaceae). Biometric and physicochemical parameters were characterized across three fruit ripening stages (green, turning, ripe). Additionally, proximate composition was determined in ripe fruits, and methanol concentration (25–75%), ultrasonic amplitude (30–70%), and time (1–15 min) were optimized using response surface methodology with a Box-Behnken design. During ripening, weight increased by +47.7% (3.89 to 5.74 g; p < 0.0001), TSS by +26.1% (7.00 to 8.83 °Brix), pH decreased by 32.0% (6.28 to 4.27), and acidity increased by 276% (0.25 to 0.94%). The quadratic models demonstrated high predictive accuracy (R² > 96.5%; p < 0.004). Optimal conditions (57% methanol, 70% amplitude, and 15 min) maximized total anthocyanin content (120.71 ± 1.89 mg cyanidin-3-glucoside/L), total phenols (672.46 ± 5.84 mg GAE/100 g), and antioxidant capacity (5857.55 ± 60.20 µmol Trolox/100 g) in ripe fruits. Anthocyanins were undetectable in green fruits, reaching 46.01 mg C3G/L in turning fruits and 120.71 mg/L in ripe fruits (162% higher than turning fruits). Principal component analysis (90.6% variance) revealed synchronized co-accumulation of anthocyanins and phenols, enhanced by vacuolar acidification. These results position ripe C. tomentosum fruits as a raw material for natural colorants, nutraceuticals, and functional foods.

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Material
2.2. Chemical Reagents
2.3. Classification of Maturity Stages and Sample Preparation
2.4. Morphological Characterization
2.5. Biometric Characterization
2.6. Physicochemical Characteristics
2.7. Proximate Composition
2.8. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction (UAE)
2.9. Quantification of Total Phenols
2.10. Quantification of Monomeric Anthocyanins
2.11. Antioxidant Capacity by DPPH
2.12. Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Morphological, Biometric, and Physicochemical Characterization During Ripening
3.1.1. Plant and Fruit Morphology
3.1.2. Biometric Parameters
3.2. Proximate Composition of Ripe Fruits
3.3. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Optimization
3.3.1. Box-Behnken Experimental Design
3.3.2. ANOVA Fit and Regression Coefficients
3.3.3. Response Surfaces and Mechanistic Interpretation
3.3.4. Multi-Response Optimization and Validation
3.4. Application of Optimal Conditions Across Maturity Stages
3.5. Principal Component Analysis
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ANOVA | Analysis of variance |
| AOAC | Association of Official Analytical Chemists |
| BBD | Box-Behnken design |
| C3G | Cyanidin-3-glucoside |
| DPPH | 2,2-diphenyl-l-picrylhydrazyl |
| FRAP | Ferric reducing antioxidant power |
| GAE | Gallic acid equivalents |
| MI | Maturity index |
| RSM | Response surface methodology |
| TA | Titratable acidity |
| TAC | Total anthocyanin content |
| TE | Trolox equivalents |
| TPC | Total phenolic content |
| TSS | Total soluble solids |
| UAE | Ultrasound-assisted extraction |
References
- Cañigueral, S. Plantas Medicinales y Drogas Vegetales. OFFARM 2003, 22, 161–162. [Google Scholar]
- Chondrodendron Tomentosum. Available online: https://ntbg.org/database/plants/detail/chondrodendron-tomentosum (accessed on 13 October 2025).
- Instituto de Salud Pública Curare, Pareira. 2021, 9–11.
- Atongbiik, M.; Olaide, R.; Hensel, O.; Sturm, B.; Kudadam, J. Nutritional Characteristics of Four Underutilized Edible Wild Fruits of Dietary Interest in Ghana. Foods 2019, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ayuso, M.; Cruz, F.; Ramos, M.; Nicolás, N.; Ramos, M.; Rodríguez, M.; Calvo, P. Characterization and Classification of Berry (Aronia, Haskap, and Goji) Fruits with High Bioactive Value Grown in Spain. Foods 2024, 13, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feng, C.; Su, S.; Wang, L.; Wu, J.; Tang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Shu, Q.; Wang, L. Antioxidant Capacities and Anthocyanin Characteristics of the Black–Red Wild Berries Obtained in Northeast China. Food Chem. 2016, 204, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vega, A.; Rodríguez, Á.; Stucken, K. Antioxidant, Functional Properties and Health-promoting Potential of Native South American Berries: A Review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 364–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bozdogan, N.; Yıldız, E.; Tunç, Y.; Khadivi, A.; Yaman, M.; Sümbül, A.; Ugurtan, K.; Ates, U.; Oztürk, B. Morphological, Biochemical, and Molecular Characterizations of Rosehip (Rosa Canina, L.) Genotypes Naturally Grown in the Eastern Central Anatolia Region of Türkiye. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam). 2025, 350, 114375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ercıslı, S.; Ibrahim, H. Wild Edible Fruits: A Rich Source of Biodiversity. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Derg. 2017, 27, 116–122. [Google Scholar]
- Bhadange, Y.; Carpenter, J.; Kumar, V. A Comprehensive Review on Advanced Extraction Techniques for Retrieving Bioactive Components from Natural Sources. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 31274–31297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carpentieri, S.; Soltanipour, F.; Ferrari, G.; Pataro, G.; Donsì, F. Emerging Green Techniques for the Extraction of Antioxidants from Agri-Food by-Products as Promising Ingredients for the Food Industry. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Athanasiadis, V.; Chatzimitakos, T.; Mantiniotou, M.; Kalompatsios, D.; Kotsou, K.; Makrygiannis, I.; Bozinou, E.; Lalas, S. Optimization of Four Different Rosemary Extraction Techniques Using Plackett–Burman Design and Comparison of Their Antioxidant Compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, C.; Ching, M.; Pin, S.; Ling, N. A Review on Extraction Techniques and Its Future Applications in Industry. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2021, 123, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González, A.; Vázquez, M.; Espada, E.; Ferreiro, M.; Carrera, C.; Palma, M.; Álvarez, J.; Barbero, G.; Ayuso, J. Optimization of Analytical Ultrasound-Assisted Methods for the Extraction of Total Phenolic Compounds and Anthocyanins from Sloes (Prunus Spinosa, L.). Agronomy 2020, 10, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vázquez, M.; González, A.; Espada, E.; Ferreiro, M.; Toledo, J.; Carrera, C.; Palma, M.; Barbero, G. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Two Types of Antioxidant Compounds (TPC and TA) from Black Chokeberry (Aronia Melanocarpa, L.): Optimization of the Individual and Simultaneous Extraction Methods. Agronomy 2019, 9, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández, G.; Pinedo, C.; Espada, E.; Ferreiro, M.; Carrera, C.; Palma, M.; García, C. Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Jabuticaba (Myrciaria Cauliflora) Fruit through a Box-Behnken Experimental Design. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 39, 1018–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González, A.; Vázquez, M.; Espada, E.; Ferreiro, M.; Amores, A.; Palma, M.; Barbero, G.; Jiménez, A. Alternative Ultrasound-Assisted Method for the Extraction of the Bioactive Compounds Present in Myrtle (Myrtus Communis, L.). Molecules 2019, 24, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espada, E.; Ferreiro, M.; Carrera, C.; Palma, M.; Barroso, C.; Barbero, G. Optimization of the Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Anthocyanins and Total Phenolic Compounds in Mulberry (Morus Nigra) Pulp. Food Chem. 2017, 219, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Justicia, M.; Madueño, A.; Ruiz, A.; Molina, J.; López, M.; Madueño, J.; Granados, J. Low-Frequency Characterisation of Mesocarp Electrical Conductivity in Different Varieties of Olives (Olea Europaea, L.). Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 142, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safy, S.; Khalifa, A.; Almashad, A.; Mohamed, A.; Hammad, E.; Sami, R.; Aljahani, A.; Pareek, S.; Helal, M.; Alharthi, S.; et al. Utilization of Jamun Fruit (Syzygium Cumini, L.) for Value Added Food Products. J. Food Qual. 4606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCullum, R.; Saifullah, M.; Bowyer, M.; Vuong, Q. Characteristics, Bioactives and Antioxidant Activity of Illawarra Plum (Podocarpus Elatus) Fruit. eFood 2025, 6, e70088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rymbai, H.; Kumar, J.M.V.; Kumar, S.; Hazarika, S.; Ercisli, S.; Kumar, V.; Sulusoglu, M. Maturity Stages Modulate Fruit Quality, Bioactive Constituents, and Antioxidant Activity of Prunus Jenkinsii. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2023, 71, 1541–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AOAC INTERNATIONAL Official Method 967.21: Vitamin, C. In; Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2019; pp. 21–22.
- Latimer, G.W. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL.; 22nd ed.; Oxford University Press, 2023. [CrossRef]
- Santos, J.; Damiani, C.; Crivelari, M.; Nunes, E.; Vilas, E. Volatile Profiling of Pitanga Fruit (Eugenia Uniflora, L.) at Different Ripening Stages Using Solid-Phase Microextraction and Mass Spectrometry Coupled with Gas Chromatography. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam). 2019, 250, 366–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AOAC INTERNATIONAL Official Method 954.01: Crude Protein. In; Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2019; p. 24.
- NTP Peruvian Technical Standard 205.003: Cereals and Legumes. Determination of Crude Fiber. In; National Quality Institute, 2011; pp. 1–5.
- AOAC INTERNATIONAL Official Method 930.09: Fat. In; Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2019; p. 24.
- Christou, A.; Stavrou, I.; Kapnissi, C. Continuous and Pulsed Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Carob’s Antioxidants: Processing Parameters Optimization and Identification of Polyphenolic Composition. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 76, 105630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Razola, M.; Aznar, M.; Guerra, E.; García, B.; Gómez, A.; Verardo, V. Establishment of a Sonotrode Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Apple Pomace. Foods 2022, 11, 3809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alvarez, E.; de la Rosa, L.; Amarowicz, R.; Shahidi, F. Antioxidant Activity of Fresh and Processed Jalapeño and Serrano Peppers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, J.; Durst, R.; Wrolstad, R. Determination of Total Monomeric Anthocyanin Pigment Content of Fruit Juices, Beverages, Natural Colorants, and Wines by the PH Differential Method: Collaborative Study. J. AOAC Int. 2005, 88, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pyrzynska, K.; Pekal, A. Application of Free Radical Diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) to Estimate the Antioxidant Capacity of Food Samples. Anal. Methods 2013, 5, 4288–4295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castro, R.; Vásquez, C.; Gil, M.; Parra, C.; Ramos, P.; Morales, L. Evolution of the Volatile Organic Compounds, Phenols and Antioxidant Capacity during Fruit Ripening and Development of Rubus Ulmifolius Schott Fruits. Horticulturae 2022, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murcia, A.; Ruiz, H.; Balaguera, H. Estudio Del Crecimiento y Desarrollo Del Fruto de Agraz (Vaccinium Meridionale Swartz) Bajo Condiciones de Clima Frío. Biotecnol. en el Sect. Agropecu. y Agroindustrial 2021, 19, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivancic, T.; Jakopic, J.; Veberic, R.; Vesel, V.; Hudina, M. Effect of Ripening on the Phenolic and Sugar Contents in the Meso- and Epicarp of Olive Fruits (Olea Europaea, L.) Cultivar ‘Leccino. ’ Agriculture 2022, 12, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomez, L.; Poblete, J.; García, V.; Vidal, R. Cauchao Berry (Amomyrtus Luma) as a Promising Source of Bioactive Compounds: Optimized Extraction, Phytochemical Characterization, and Assessment of Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Potential. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernal, J.; Molina, J.; Angoa, M.; Cárdenas, J.; García, I.; Ceja, J.; Mena, H. Phenolic Compound Content and the Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Wild Blueberries (Vaccinium Stenophyllum Steud.) Fruits Extracts during Ripening. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agostino, M.; Sicari, V.; Giuffrè, A.; Soria, A. Blackberries (Rubus Ulmifolius Schott) from Calabria (Italy): A Comprehensive Characterisation. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2022, 248, 905–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nehring, P.; Tischer, S.; Schulz, M.; Betta, F.; Gonzaga, L.; Vitali, L.; da Silva, M.; Amadeu, G.; Oliveira, A.; Fett, R. Grumixama (Eugenia Brasiliensis Lamarck) Functional Phytochemicals: Effect of Environmental Conditions and Ripening Process. Food Res. Int. 2022, 157, 111460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flor, O.; Guanochanga, F.; Samaniego, I.; Arias, V.; Ortiz, B.; Rosales, C.; Palacios, H. Physicochemical Characterization and Antioxidant Capacity of Açaí (Euterpe Oleracea) in Ecuadorian Region. Foods 2024, 13, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sasikumar, R.; Kambhampati, V.; Kumar, J.; Paras, S.; Govindasam, K.; Jaiswal, A. Nutritional, Phytochemical, and Toxicological Profiles of Blood Fruit (Haematocarpus Validus). J. Agric. Food Res. 2025, 19, 101731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drăghici, A.; Pârvulescu, O.; Stan, R.; Brezoiu, A. Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Romanian Blackthorn (Prunus Spinosa, L.) Fruits. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kashyap, P.; Singh, C.; Jindal, N. Polyphenol Bio-Accessibility and Antioxidant Activity of in Vitro Digested Ultrasound-Assisted Meghalayan Cherry (Prunus Nepalensis) Pomace Extract. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2022, 13, 14071–14085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sousa, L.; Alves, E.; Narciso, F.; Sousa, E.; Silva, I. Optimization of Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Ultrasound Methods for Recovery of Anthocyanins Present in Jambolan Fruit (Syzygium Cumini, L.). Food Bioprod. Process. 2021, 127, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Characteristic | Green (index 0) | Turning (index 1) | Ripe (index 2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Images | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Shape | Ovoid | Ovoid | Ovoid |
| Epicarp | Thin, intense green, rough | Thin, yellowish-red, smooth | Thin, blackish-violet, smooth, glossy |
| Mesocarp | Pale green, firm, darkens upon cutting | Red, semi-fleshy, slightly soft | Garnet, scarce, juicy, soft |
| Endocarp | Lunate seed, whitish-yellowish testa, hard | Lunate seed, light yellow testa, hard | Lunate seed covered with pulp, light yellow testa, hard |
| Parameter | Green | Turning | Ripe | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biometric characteristics | ||||
| Polar diameter (cm) | 2.34 ± 0.15 b | 2.45 ± 0.22 a | 2.49 ± 0.17 a | <0.0001 |
| Equatorial diameter (cm) | 1.71 ± 0.15 b | 1.90 ± 0.18 a | 1.97 ± 0.14 a | <0.0001 |
| Weight (g) | 3.89 ± 0.86 b | 5.24 ± 1.31 a | 5.74 ± 1.07 a | <0.0001 |
| Physicochemical characteristics | ||||
| Vitamin C (mg/100 g fresh sample) | 5.12 ± 0.01 b | 4.78 ± 0.01 c | 10.22 ± 0.01 a | <0.0001 |
| TSS (°Brix) | 7.00 ± 0.00 c | 7.50 ± 0.00 b | 8.83 ± 0.29 a | <0.0001 |
| pH | 6.28 ± 0.04 a | 4.60 ± 0.02 b | 4.27 ± 0.02 c | <0.0001 |
| Titratable acidity (%) | 0.25 ± 0.01 c | 0.62 ± 0.02 b | 0.94 ± 0.02 a | <0.0001 |
| Maturity index | 27.82 ± 0.83 c | 12.13 ± 0.38 b | 9.42 ± 0.49 a | <0.0001 |
| Methanol (%) | Amplitude (%) | Time (min) | Response variables | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthocyanins a | Total phenols b | Antioxidant capacity c | |||
| 25 (-1) | 30 (-1) | 8 (0) | 50.50 ± 1.28 | 431.45 ± 3.74 | 3106.72 ± 91.39 |
| 25 (-1) | 50 (0) | 1 (-1) | 42.64 ± 0.64 | 372.05 ± 0.79 | 1869.09 ± 111.22 |
| 25 (-1) | 50 (0) | 15 (+1) | 64.87 ± 2.61 | 608.97 ± 3.70 | 3784.06 ± 118.17 |
| 25 (-1) | 70 (+1) | 8 (0) | 54.02 ± 1.58 | 525.86 ± 3.94 | 3491.38 ± 104.96 |
| 50 (0) | 30 (-1) | 1 (-1) | 54.45 ± 0.79 | 386.91 ± 3.34 | 2688.60 ± 115.43 |
| 50 (0) | 30 (-1) | 15 (+1) | 85.34 ± 2.64 | 576.94 ± 3.80 | 3758.98 ± 137.04 |
| 50 (0) | 50 (0) | 8 (0) | 77.38 ± 0.72 | 572.04 ± 3.51 | 3859.33 ± 148.29 |
| 50 (0) | 50 (0) | 8 (0) | 71.93 ± 1.68 | 516.29 ± 2.40 | 3725.53 ± 142.78 |
| 50 (0) | 50 (0) | 8 (0) | 77.96 ± 1.58 | 535.42 ± 3.97 | 3625.18 ± 74.98 |
| 50 (0) | 70 (+1) | 1 (-1) | 69.63 ± 1.45 | 441.83 ± 1.00 | 2872.57 ± 127.04 |
| 50 (0) | 70 (+1) | 15 (+1) | 118.58 ± 2.57 | 677.67 ± 4.12 | 5799.38 ± 155.35 |
| 75 (+1) | 30 (-1) | 8 (0) | 93.41 ± 2.15 | 538.73 ± 3.24 | 3449.57 ± 138.29 |
| 75 (+1) | 50 (0) | 1 (-1) | 66.53 ± 1.21 | 448.27 ± 1.46 | 3098.35 ± 132.38 |
| 75 (+1) | 50 (0) | 15 (+1) | 120.82 ± 1.79 | 667.21 ± 3.13 | 5581.96 ± 131.48 |
| 75 (+1) | 70 (+1) | 8 (0) | 104.36 ± 2.81 | 547.09 ± 3.32 | 4469.78 ± 156.46 |
| Term | Anthocyanins (mg cyanidin-3-glucoside/L) | Total phenols (mg GAE/100 g) | Antioxidant capacity (uMol Trolox/100 g) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | SD | p-value | β | SD | p-value | β | SD | p-value | |||
| Intercept | 75.755 | – | – | 541.251 | – | – | 3736.68 | (–) | – | ||
| A (Methanol) | 21.635 | -2.179 | 0.0002 | 32.871 | -7.196 | 0.006 | 543.55 | -111.294 | 0.0045 | ||
| B (Amplitude) | 7.862 | -2.179 | 0.0154 | 32.302 | -7.196 | 0.0065 | 453.656 | -111.294 | 0.0096 | ||
| C (Time) | 19.544 | -2.179 | 0.0003 | 110.217 | -7.196 | <0.0001 | 1049.47 | -111.294 | 0.0002 | ||
| A² | −8.466 | -6.415 | 0.2442 | −27.183 | -21.184 | 0.2557 | −303.831 | -327.641 | 0.3963 | ||
| B² | 8.1 | -6.415 | 0.2624 | −33.761 | -21.184 | 0.1719 | 89.198 | -327.641 | 0.7963 | ||
| C² | 4.387 | -6.415 | 0.5245 | −7.067 | -21.184 | 0.7522 | −2.787 | -327.641 | 0.9935 | ||
| AB | 1.857 | -3.082 | 0.5731 | −21.512 | -10.176 | 0.0882 | 158.884 | -157.394 | 0.3591 | ||
| AC | 8.016 | -3.082 | 0.0482 | −4.495 | -10.176 | 0.6771 | 142.16 | -157.394 | 0.4078 | ||
| BC | 4.515 | -3.082 | 0.2028 | 11.454 | -10.176 | 0.3115 | 464.109 | -157.394 | 0.0319 | ||
| Response | Perdition | Experimental | Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anthocyanins (mg C3G/L) | 122.79 | 120.71 ± 1.89 | 1.69 |
| Total Phenols (mg GAE/100 g) | 675.65 | 672.46 ± 5.84 | 0.47 |
| Antioxidants (µmol TE/100 g) | 5981 | 5857.31 ± 60.20 | 2.07 |
| Maturity stage | Anthocyanins (mg C3G/L)* | Total phenols (mg GAE/100 g)** | Antioxidant capacity (µmol TE/100 g)*** |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green (0) | 0.00 ± 0.00 c | 647.83 ± 3.55 b | 5492.63 ± 54.30 b |
| Turning (3) | 46.01 ± 0.70 b | 458.86 ± 5.66 c | 3581.11 ± 39.80 c |
| Ripe (7) | 120.71 ± 1.89 a | 672.46 ± 5.84 a | 5857.55 ± 60.20 a |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).


