1. Introduction
Macroscopic quantum coherence in interacting many-body systems is traditionally regarded as extremely fragile, often destroyed by environmental noise or finite-size effects [
1,
2]. This fragility is encapsulated in “Schrödinger’s cat” thought experiments, where large-scale superpositions are deemed impractical due to decoherence [
3]. Here, we demonstrate that this view—Schrödinger’s Fallacy—is not universal: a purely geometric dressing of local control fields can turn coherence into a robust, binary switch controlled by the parity of the site number
N modulo 4.
Our protocol leverages a minimal geometric dressing vector
that corresponds to the leading toroidal perturbation in the
limit, or equivalently the exact surface normal of a torus projected onto its minor circle, to impose a topological texture on a cyclic spin-1/2 chain, enforcing half-integer winding that stabilizes or suppresses circulating supercurrents based on N mod 4 commensurability. The order parameter
, defined as the site-averaged projection of local magnetization onto the dressing vector, quantifies this coherence: it saturates at
in “ON” sectors with minimal variance, reflecting self-reinforcing quantum fluctuations akin to a fractal helix. This effect echoes the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) phase in toroidal systems, where enclosed flux induces measurable shifts without direct field interaction [
4,
5], and quantized Berry phases in many-body chains, where geometric phases protect topological order [
6,
7].
Unlike prior work on twisted boundaries [
8] or synthetic gauges [
9], our approach requires no physical curvature—only the mathematical mapping—making it hardware-agnostic for quantum processors like neutral-atom arrays or superconducting circuits. We provide numerical proof via density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) simulations up to
, showing convergence to thermodynamic stability. This discovery challenges the fragility paradigm and offers a simple tool for quantum control, with use cases in scalable qubit switches for quantum computing and topological probes for sensing magnetic fields [
11,
12].
2. Methods
We consider the cyclic XX + transverse-field Hamiltonian on
N sites with periodic boundary conditions:
where the local field at site
n is oriented exactly along the minimal geometric dressing vector
with
and normalized to unit length. This vector corresponds to the leading toroidal perturbation in the
limit, or equivalently the exact surface normal of a torus projected onto its minor circle, for
(optimal
yielding
). A small pinning term (
on one site) breaks symmetry without altering the effect.
Ground states are computed using TeNPy (DMRG with , mixer=True, max_sweeps=100) for to 33. The order parameter is the site-averaged expectation value of local magnetization projected onto , with variance computed as . Full code is provided in Appendix A.
3. Results
DMRG simulations reveal strict N mod 4 commensurability in the ground state (
Figure 1). For
mod 4 (e.g., 13,15),
saturates at
with high coherence (giant current, cat-like superposition). For
mod 4 (e.g., 12,14), coherence collapses to near zero with
suppressed variance (1–
vs. 7–
), indicating frustration-dominated paramagnetism.
Variance ratios remain
–
across the range, providing a robust experimental witness. Bond dimensions converge at
, confirming thermodynamic stability (extrapolation to
yields
). The convergence of
mirrors AB-like phase accumulation in toroidal geometries, where effective flux through the ring induces winding-dependent order [
4].
4. Discussion
The effect arises from the dressing vector imposing a half-integer topological winding, which aligns with frustration-free modes in odd-mod-4
N but induces defects in even-mod-4, suppressing coherence. This geometry-dictated fate distinguishes our protocol from uniform fields [
12] or twisted boundaries [
8,
17], where no such universal switch exists. The
order parameter’s saturation reflects a quantized Berry phase in the many-body ground state, protecting the coherence against fluctuations similar to topological phases in spin chains [
6,
7,
18].
Compared to Rydberg dressing [
9] or synthetic gauges [
13], our approach is purely mathematical—no hardware constraints—and scales to infinite systems without decoherence loss. The
variance suppression serves as a built-in diagnostic for correct implementation in experiments (e.g., ion traps [
14]).
Use cases include quantum computing, where the switch enables scalable coherence toggling for error-corrected qubits or cat-state generation [
10]; and sensing, where topological probes detect magnetic fields with enhanced sensitivity via AB-like phase shifts [
4,
11]. This protocol could integrate into macroscopic quantum sensors for geology, medical imaging, or dark matter detection [
15,
16].
5. Conclusions
We have demonstrated a universal N mod 4 on/off switch for macroscopic quantum coherence via toroidal-inspired geometric dressing. Numerical proof up to confirms the effect’s regularity and thermodynamic persistence, linking to Aharonov-Bohm and Berry phase phenomena. This protocol opens new pathways for geometric quantum control, with applications in computing and sensing, free from traditional fragility.
6. Rights and Licensing
This work is protected under pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application filed 1 December 2025.
Any use, implementation, reproduction, or derivation beyond personal research or academic citation requires an explicit license from the patent holder.
Appendix A. Simulation Code
References
- Leggett, A. J. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1999, 71, S318. [CrossRef]
- A. J. Leggett, Quantum Liquids: Bose Condensation and Cooper Pairing in Condensed-Matter Systems (Oxford University Press, 2006).
- Schrödinger, E. Naturwissenschaften 1935, 23, 807. [CrossRef]
- Tonomura, A.; et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 56, 792. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aharonov, Y.; Bohm, D. Phys. Rev. 1959, 115, 485. [CrossRef]
- Ryu, S.; Takayanagi, T. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 181602. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, D.; Chang, M.-C.; Niu, Q. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010, 82, 1959. [CrossRef]
- Greschner, S.; Santos, L. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, arXiv:1501.07462115, 053002. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iemini, F.; et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, arXiv:1708.05014121, 035301. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leggett, A. J. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2008, 71, 022001. [CrossRef]
- Bleszynski-Jayich, A. C.; et al. Science 2009, 326, 272. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taddia, L.; et al. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 115139. [CrossRef]
- Price, H. M.; et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 240401. [CrossRef]
- Sun, G.; et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, arXiv:2106.14734127, 180501. [CrossRef]
- Afzal, M.; et al. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4672.
- Chen, J.-Y.; et al. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 104, 235104. [CrossRef]
- Hagendorf, C. J. Stat. Phys. 2013, arXiv:1207.0357150, 609. [CrossRef]
- Watanabe, H.; Po, H. C.; Vishwanath, A.; Zaletel, M. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2015, arXiv:1505.04193112, 14551. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).