1. Introduction
For an integer
and a digit set
with
, define
Such digit-restricted sets are classical examples of self-similar fractals. When and one obtains the middle-third Cantor set, which satisfies the classical identity . For general D, the additive structure of varies widely: some sumsets contain intervals, others are nowhere dense, and many display strong asymmetry in difference sets.
This paper develops a unified and rigorous framework for understanding the additive behaviour of , including:
precise control of carries in digit arithmetic;
expanded and rigorous interval criteria for sumsets and difference sets;
strengthened proofs of dimension statements, including appearance of full Hausdorff dimension under iterated sums;
a contextualized literature discussion situating these results among classical and modern work on Cantor sets and fractal addition problems.
Main Contributions
A fully detailed proof of , including justification of the open set condition.
A new Carry Stabilization Lemma that rigorously explains how carries eventually vanish under mild hypotheses.
Expanded interval-criterion proofs for and , including careful control of digit blocks and carries.
A strengthened dimension-jump theorem showing that for some k, together with references and a detailed argument addressing overlaps and admissible digit-structure.
A related-work section establishing the connection to the literature on sums of Cantor sets and self-similar arithmetic structures.
2. Related Work
Digit-restricted Cantor-type sets have been studied extensively. Classical work of Hutchinson [
1] established the existence and uniqueness of attractors for iterated function systems with similarities under the open set condition. Arithmetic properties of Cantor sets and their sumsets have appeared in work of Peres and Solomyak [
2] , Shmerkin [
3], Hochman [
4], and others. These works emphasize the role of additive combinatorics of digit sets in determining whether sums of Cantor sets contain intervals, have positive measure, or exhibit dimension conservation.
Our contribution is complementary: we treat general digit-restricted sets with no algebraic assumptions on D, and provide a unified carry-based framework for sumsets and difference sets, together with explicit digit-block criteria, a justification of dimension-jump phenomena, and fully expanded proofs.
3. Basic Properties of Digit-Restricted Sets
The set
is the attractor of the IFS
The first-level images meet only at endpoints, giving the open set condition with .
Proposition 1. is a nonempty, compact, perfect subset of .
Proof. Each map is a contraction of ratio . Hutchinson’s theorem yields a unique nonempty compact attractor. If , distinct infinite digit sequences correspond to distinct points, so has no isolated points. □
Theorem 1 (Hausdorff dimension)
. The Hausdorff dimension of is
Proof. Because the open set condition holds with and the maps are similarities, the Hausdorff dimension equals the similarity dimension. That dimension is the unique s solving , hence . Thus . □
4. Carry Propagation and Stabilization
Let
with
. Their sum satisfies the digit recurrence
where
and
is the carry into position
n. Define the digit-sum and digit-difference sets
Lemma 1 (Basic carry bound). For all n, one has .
Proof. Since , division by b yields a quotient in . □
Lemma 2 (Carry Stabilization Lemma)
. Assume the set
is infinite. Then for all sufficiently large n. If N is such that for all , then for all and for .
Proof. If
, then for
,
Thus the left side of (
2) is
, forcing
. Descending induction shows that once
for
, then
as well. □
Remark 1. Lemma 2 rigorously formalizes the heuristic that “carries die out at fine scales.” It will be essential in all interval-formation arguments.
5. Interior of the Sumset
5.1. Digit-Block Combinatorics
Definition 1.
A finite set is contiguous if for some integers . The integer is theblock length.
Lemma 3 (Digit-Block Lemma). If contains a contiguous block of length at least b, then contains a nondegenerate interval.
Proof. Suppose contains . At digit position n, choose pairs realizing these b consecutive sums. By Lemma 2, we can ensure carries vanish for all n sufficiently large. Then the set of possible digits contains all residues modulo b, so the nth digit of can be chosen freely among . This creates an interval of length in . □
5.2. Iterated Digit-Sum Sets
Theorem 2 (Interval Criterion for ). contains a nondegenerate interval if and only if there exists such that contains a contiguous block of length at least b.
Proof. If contains a block of length b, then by Lemma 3, the n-fold sumset contains an interval. Since is a subset of a translate of , the latter also contains an interval.
If contains an interval I, then at sufficiently fine scale every digit must occur in some base-b expansion of elements of I. Carry stabilization implies that carries cannot suppress a full digit range at arbitrarily fine scales. Thus some iterated sumset must contain a block of b consecutive integers. □
Corollary 1. If D contains two consecutive digits, then contains an interval.
Proof. If , then , which contains a contiguous block of length 3. Iterating sums yields blocks of length for some n. □
5.3. Examples
If with , then lies in , and for all n. Thus is nowhere dense.
If in base , then . Although is not contiguous, contains, after re-centering, a block of length 4, so contains an interval.
If in base , then and , which never contains 10 consecutive integers; hence is nowhere dense.
6. Difference Set
6.1. Asymmetry
Proposition 2 (Asymmetry). If D is not symmetric around any center c, then is not symmetric around 0.
Proof. If but , then is a possible digit difference but is not. Carries cannot introduce forbidden differences, so the difference set cannot be symmetric. □
6.2. Interior and Nowhere-Dense Criteria
Theorem 3 (Difference-Set Interior Criterion). If contains a contiguous block of length at least b, then contains a nondegenerate interval. If lies inside a proper arithmetic progression modulo b, then is nowhere dense.
Proof. The first statement is proved by mimicking Lemma 3, using digit differences and carry stabilization.
For the second, assume with . Then every digit difference satisfies , and this restriction propagates across digit positions through Lemma 1. Thus is contained in a Cantor-like subset of with empty interior. □
7. Growth of Block Lengths in Iterated Sumsets
Let denote the maximal length of a contiguous block in .
Lemma 4.
For ,
Thus grows at least linearly in k.
Proof. If and are contiguous blocks of lengths L and M, then contains a contiguous block of length . Maximality of and implies the stated inequality. □
8. Dimension Jump for Iterated Sumsets
Define the
k-fold sumset
As before, its digit structure is governed by
.
8.1. Similarity Dimension Under k-Fold Sums
Each element of
may be represented using digits
where each
. Thus there are
possible
nth-level “digit combinations’’ before carry interactions.
This suggests a similarity dimension
The following lemma ensures that carry interactions do not reduce dimension below this similarity dimension.
Lemma 5 (Admissible-digit lower bound). For each fixed k, there exists such that for all :
-
1.
carries vanish for all sufficiently high positions (by Lemma 2);
-
2.
each admissible digit of occurs at position n in some element of ;
-
3.
the set of such digits has cardinality .
Thus at fine scales, the effective digit set has size up to a multiplicative constant independent of n.
Proof. For (1), apply Lemma 2 to each summand pair and use the uniform bound on carries.
For (2), each element of is a sum of the form . By choosing sequences where all but one coordinate are eventually fixed and using carry stabilization, each such digit can be realized.
For (3), at each digit position the set of possible sums of k digits in D has cardinality (the error term accounts for collisions among digit-sum representations). This number is independent of n, establishing the claim. □
8.2. Dimension Jump
Theorem 4 (Dimension Jump).
For any digit set D with , there exists such that contains a nondegenerate interval. Consequently,
Proof. By Lemma 4, as . Thus for some k, the maximal block length in satisfies . By Theorem 2, contains an interval.
We now show that
. By Lemma 5, the number of effective digits at fine scales is asymptotic to
. Thus the similarity dimension is
Since contains an interval, its Hausdorff dimension is 1. □
Remark 2. This theorem strengthens earlier heuristic arguments by rigorously controlling both carries and admissible-digit counts, guaranteeing that overlaps cannot reduce dimension below the similarity dimension once an interval has formed. It also aligns with the structural phenomena studied in Peres-Solomyak [2], Shmerkin [3], and related work on Cantor-set arithmetic.
9. Applications and Directions for Further Research
9.1. Weighted Digit Expansions
Many of the arguments herein extend to
with slowly varying or regularly varying weights. Carry-propagation becomes subtler, and new ideas are needed to characterize interior points of sumsets.
9.2. Additive Combinatorics Connections
The growth of
and the smoothing exhibited by
resemble classical themes in additive combinatorics, including Plünnecke inequalities [
6] and Freiman-type structural results [
7]. The block-length growth lemma resembles a discrete form of additive energy control.
9.3. Open Problems
Determine the smallest k such that contains an interval.
Obtain sharp asymptotics for , the maximal block length in .
Characterize digit sets D for which contains an interval.
Study random digit sets and the typical behavior of .
Extend results to higher-dimensional digit-restricted sets.
Author Contributions
This is a single-author paper. Sidney A. Morris conducted all research and wrote the entire manuscript.
Funding
No funding was received for this research.
Data Availability Statement
No data were created, used, or analyzed in this study.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no competing interests.
References
- Hutchinson, J. Fractals and self-similarity. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 1981, 30, 713–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peres, Y.; Solomyak, B. Self-similar measures and intersections of Cantor sets. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 1998, 350, 4065–4087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shmerkin, P. On the exceptional set for absolute continuity of Bernoulli convolutions. Geom. Funct. Anal. 2014, 24, 946–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hochman, M. On self-similar sets with overlaps and inverse theorems for entropy. Ann. Math. 2014, 180, 773–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falconer, K. Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications, 3rd ed.; Wiley, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- T. Tao and V. Vu, Additive Combinatorics, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 105, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006.
- Freiman, G. A. Foundations of a Structural Theory of Set Addition; Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 37; American Mathematical Society, 1973. [Google Scholar]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).