1. Overview and Existing Research
Yanfu Temple is located in a valley in Tao Village, Taoxi Town, Wuyi County, Zhejiang Province. The temple is situated from north to south, with the mountain gate, heavenly king's hall, life releasing pool, great hall, Guanyin hall in order of the central axis, and subsidiary buildings on each side. The great hall is the most ancient one, which was rebuilt in the fourth year of the reign of Yuan Yanyou (1317 AD), and is the main building of the temple.
In the 1930s, Mr Liang Sicheng and other gentlemen inspected the temple, leaving mapping sketches, photographs and manuscripts. After the liberation of the temple also experienced several repairs, the temple can be protected, the main hall can be retained. 1996 Yanfu temple listed in the fourth batch of national key cultural relics protection list. 1999 Yanfu temple ushered in the century of major repairs. 2013 zhejiang province institute of ancient architectural design published ‘yuan dynasty wooden Yanfu temple’ (Huang 2013), the book of the century of major repairs of the survey, design, administrative documents, completion reports, drawings, Related research, historical documents are included, all the original data in this paper are derived from this. The current situation of the hall is two eaves. In 2023, Mr Zhang Yaxuan proved that the lower eaves and the secondary columns were added during the restoration in the Tianshun period of the Ming Dynasty (Zhang 2020). This article only discusses the Yuan structure part.
2. Yingzao chi (Construction Ruler)
2.1. Length of a Ruler in the Yuan Dynasty
The Chinese History of Science and Technology, Volume of Weights and Measures is a collection of studies on weights and measures in China through the ages
(Lu 2001, 145). He records that there is not a single heirloom Yuan ruler, and he includes some speculations made by various authors based on historical documents, with the data listed in
Table 1. The seven ruler lengths span a wide range and are all longer than 300 mm, which means that the Yuan ruler lengths ranged from 306 mm to 412 mm. He also included 15 official seal, according to the official seal system and the actual amount of value, deduced the maximum length of the ruler and the minimum length of the ruler, such as
Table 1. average value is about 348. 65 mm. Although he included the views of various parties, the length of the Yuan dynasty is not uniform.
Existing architectural remains of the ruler length is also the development of change, collect some data such as
Table 2, according to each structural parameters and proportionality of the relationship can be calculated to create the ruler length. Ningbo Baoguo Temple was rebuilt in the Northern Song Dynasty in the sixth year of Xiangfu (1013), and Wuyi Yanfusi Temple is located in the same south of the Yangtze River, there is an important reference significance, but the difference in the construction of more than three hundred years, Yanfusi Temple hall using the construction ruler is unlikely. Jincheng two immortal temple main hall for the late sung, construction ruler is 299. 39 mm. Lingchuan Xixi Erxian Temple rear hall for the Jin Dynasty. The Tangwang Hall of Dayang Tangdi Temple in Jincheng, Shanxi, is not later than the fourth year of Yuan Zhizheng (1344). In comparison, the length of the construction ruler is a changing value, which varies from era to era and region to region.
The Yuan Dynasty was a vast area with different customs and products. The civil rule of the Mongol Yuan rulers was weak, the official or have unified the whole territory of the metric scale, but each place has a different standard of measurement used for living and building. Do not hesitate to refer to the ruler length of the Ming Dynasty in the Song Dynasty. As
Table 1, Song dynasty ruler length 31. 4 cm, in use for 31. 2-31. 6 cm, Ming dynasty Yingzao chi length identified as 32 cm. Yingzao chi was used for construction, and the technique was passed from master to disciple by heart and mouth, so the Yuan dynasty construction ruler should be closer to the Song or Ming dynasty ruler length. Looking at
Table 1 and
Table 2 in general, the Yingzao chi for this hall is limited to between 287 mm and 356 mm, with a focus on 300 to 320 mm.
2.2. The System of Large and Small Ruler
The system of large and small chi was used in the Tang Dynasty and all subsequent dynasties
(Lu 2001, 319). The large chi was the common chi and the small chi was used for rituals and music, astronomy, medicine and other scenarios that required precise calculations. This method of accumulating grains as chi as a theoretical basis was valued by the officials of successive dynasties. Taking the northern grains of millet as the standard, ten grains of millet is a small cun, ten small cun a small chi, 12 small cun is a big chi. The big ruler is the daily ruler, widely used, usually called chi, divided into ten parts, each part is 1 cun
(Lu 2001, 319). This measurement is not an isolated case, as in
Table 2, there are a large number of applications in ancient architecture. When analysing this hall, attention should also be paid to the system of large and small rulers.
2.3. Column Head Plan and Yingzao chi
Building services to people, the column network layout determines the main practical space, the subjective habit of people is to take the integer, so the main parameters of the building should try to take the integer. The main parameters of Damuzuo (greater structural carpentry) are listed in
Table 3. Tong MianKuo (The sum of all widths of the bays) is 8200mm, Tong Jinshen (The sum of all depths of the bays) is 8340mm and the height is 8525mm. he three are similar and form a series with a difference of about half a chi.
After repeated comparisons and fitting, Yingzao chi is 315. 48 mm. As in
Table 3, assuming a Tong MianKuo of 260 cun, Tong Jinshen of 265 cun, and a height of 270 cun, Each bay is 140 cun, 60 cun, 115 cun, 90 cun, and the length of the ruler is calculated respectively, and the average value is both the Yingzao chi. Each parameter can also be converted to a small cun, as shown in
Figure 1.
2.4. Architectural Module
Architectural modulus is a basic theory of modern architecture (MOHURD 2013), but it has been used in ancient Chinese buildings for a long time. As shown in
Table 2, all of these buildings used architectural modulus. As in
Table 3, the main parameter of this hall is not only the 1chi multiple, but also the 0. 4 small cun and 4 small cun multiples. It will be demonstrated below that the other elements were designed with 4 small cun and 0. 4 small cun, which is the series modulus.
3. Cai (Similar to Dimension Lumber) and Puzuo (Bracket Set)
3.1. Cai
Cai data listed in
Table 4, converted to small cun, and then rounded to the nearest whole number.
The width of the Cai is 100mm in the text, and the mortise and tenon opening in the drawing is also 100mm. The drawing marked Gong Cai width is 95 mm, about 3. 6 Small cun. The difference is 5mm. Comparison of drawings, mortise and tenon mouth is slightly larger than the width of Cai in line with the rationale, so the Cai width was fitted to 3. 6 Small cun.
Dangcai (single-sized timbers) data in Document 1 are the same in the drawings and transcripts, both are 155 mm, only between the beams and frames is 150 mm single-sized timbers. The standard cai is mainly used for the outer eaves, so the cai is 155 mm as the standard value. The cai is compressed in the height direction, with 155 mm being approximately 5. 896 small cun, and Fit upwards to 6 small cun.
The Qi is 60 mm, directly converted to 2. 282 small cun and fitted towards the larger to 2. 4 small cun. The Zucai (full-sized timbers) is also dimensioned to 8. 4 small cun.
3.2. Dou (Bearing Block)
Dou raw data converted to small cun, and then take the whole number, such as
Table 5, such as
Figure 2. macroscopic Dou for the size of the two categories. ludou (the cap block) is a large category, used for the head of the column, without distinguishing between the corner column or other column. The small ones are Jiaohu dou (the connection block), Qixin dou (the coordinated bearing block), Sandou (the dispersed block) and Pingpan dou (the flat-plate bearing block), These Dou have slightly different external dimensions.
The dimensions of these dou are all integral multiples of 0. 4 small cun.
3.3. Parameters of Gong (Bracketarm) and Puzuo
The installation of three Dou on Gong is a common combination, which can also be interpreted as a component, with three parameters to focus on. One is the arch length, which is the solid length of the Gong. Second is Xin chang (critical dimension between joint centers), The assembly of Gong and Dou is that the centre point of Dou corresponds to the left, middle and right nodes of Gong, and the distance between the left and right nodes is the Xin chang of Gong. The Xin chang value is calculated by subtracting the width of the bottom of a Dou from the length of the gong. The third is the total width of the assembly, with three with Dou installed on the Gong, the maximum size is the total width of the Dou installed on the Gong. This parameter is obtained by adding the top width of one Dou by Xin chang. Gong data are listed in
Table 6, converted to small cun and rounded to the nearest whole number. Based on the assembly relationship between the Dou and the Gong the following results are obtained. As shown in
Figure 3,
Figure 4 and
Figure 5.
The Puzuo has an outside jump of 680 mm, which is approximately 26 small cun. This position is specifically identified in Document as having traces of later maintenance changes (Huang 2013), and based on the traces of the changes, the Puzuo was recovered to have an external jump of 840 mm, which fits to 32 small cun.
The inner jump of the Puzuo is fitted to 36 small cun.
The length of the nidao gong (base-tier transverse arm) is 26. 4 small cun, and the total width of the nidao gong assembly is 28 small cun, which is the widest point of the Puzuo, so the width of the Puzuo is 28 small cun.
The other horizontal gongs are all shorter than the nidao gong. Ling gong (regular arm) is 24 small cun long, Guazi gong (intermediate short bracket arm) is 16 small cun long, and Jiaofu gong (interlocking beam bracket) is 24 small cun long. Mangong (primary axial arm) is located directly above the nidao gong, which is 25. 2 small cun, 1. 2 small cun shorter than the nidao gong.
Puzuo length, width and height are the main parameters of Puzuo, all are 4 small cun integer multiples. The length of other Gong is 4 small cun times, some are not. This is because the Gong is Puzuo parts, is to serve and obey the Puzuo, according to the Puzuo structural needs and dimensions of the needs to set. Of course these parameters are all whole multiples of 0. 4 small cun.
4. Segments of Height
4.1. Column
The columns are fusiform/spindle-shaped, distinct from the straight columns typical of contemporaneous northern architecture. the relevant data for the columns are listed in
Table 7. The eave columns are the lowest, ground level to the head of the columns is 4820 mm, fitting to 184 small cuns, exactly 46 times 4 small cuns. The inner columns are higher than the eave columns, which is set by the structural needs of the building.
4.2. Height of Wu Ju (Ridged Purlin) and Puzuo (Bracket Set)
Puzuo height and Wu Ju (ridged purlin) height literature 1 does not have direct data, indirect data projected as
Table 8. due to later maintenance repair Ling gong moved inward, can only be based on the structural relationship of the projections. As in (
Figure 3 and
Figure 4), the layers above the eave column are clearly delineated, with one layer of Ludou, five layers of Zucai, one layer of Timu (cantilevered timbers), and one Tuan (purlin), totalling 58 small cun. As in
Figure 4, the height positions of the three Tuan are fixed with a height difference of 16 small cuns, and the height of the liao-yan-fang (eaves purlin) can be deduced from the principle of triangle similarity. So Puzuo is 44 small cun high and Wu Ju is 96 small cun. Both are whole multiples of 4 small cun.
4.3. Computational Modeling of Curved Roof Polylines
As shown in
Figure 7 and
Figure 8, the roof slope consists of four Jia dao (between adjacent purlins), namely Yan bu, xia-jin bu, shang-jin bu, Ji bu, and the data are shown in
Table 9. Some features can be found.
Firstly, the horizontal spacing and Vertical spacing of each Jia dao are all whole small cuns, and most of the slopes are simple whole-number ratios, with some features of the Qing-style ju-jia (roof pitch system in Qing official architecture).
Secondly, Wu Ju 96 small cun, is 8 chi, a whole number. This value is associated with the column height, Puzuo, and the total height of 324 small cun, Tong MianKuo, Tong Jinshen is set uniformly. Apparently the Wu Ju96 small cun was determined first, then the roof slope curve was calculated, not the Qing-style ju-jia.
Thirdly, the slopes of each Jia dao are increasing, but not in equal proportions, nor in equal differences. yan bu and xia-jin bu have similar slopes, and can be seen as a whole. shang-jin bu and Ji bu are not very different, and can be seen as a whole. There are clearly two segments of house slopes, Yan bu and xia-jin bu as one segment, and shang-jin bu and Ji bu as the other. Obviously this is not the method of Yingzao Fashi.
This calculation method starts by dividing the roof slope into two sections, outlining the general shape first, and slightly adjusting each Jia dao within the integer range. notice that the correlation between Yan bu and Puzuo is very strong, and the slope of Yan bu is fixed at 4 to 9. The designer compares Yan bu with Wu Ju, and the overall harmonisation is sufficient. This method has programmed characteristics. Most of the folk halls are three rooms, a few are five rooms, and the scale of the building is usually small, so the designer can meet the different needs of the folk construction by having a fixed set of several styles.
5. Rafters and Profile Parameters
5.1. Rafters
There are no flying rafters in the current state of the hall, only rafters. Document 1 recorded before the overhaul survey, the hall rafters there are offspring change, good and bad phenomenon, rafters have square and round two kinds. The four gable positions retain more than 40 round cedar rafters about 100 mm in diameter, longer than two Jia da, the style of tenon is old and the shape is the same as that of Tianning Temple in Jinhua. Repair presumed to be early Yuan Dynasty rafters. And accordingly the repair design.
The rafter data is shown in
Table 10, as in
Figure 3 and
Figure 4. The rafter data is shown in
Table 10, as in
Figure 3 and
Figure 4. With the head of the post as the fulcrum, the rafter has an outside pick of 78 small cun and an inside out of 36 small cun. If the liao-yan-fang is the fulcrum, the rafter is 46 small cun outside and 68 small cun inside. Therefore no flying rafter should be set in this hall. so that the east-west rafter head distance is 39 chi and the north-south rafter head distance is 39. 5 chi.
5.2. Principal Ridge (Zhengji) and Profile Parameters
As in
Table 10, and as in
Figure 6,
Figure 7, and
Figure 9. chu ji (Overhanging eaves) 62 small cun, the length of the Principal Ridge is 292 small cun. As in
Figure 5, Corner Beam (Jiao Liang) is 2319. 31 mm flat out from the front side of the stigma, fitting to 90 small cun. As in
Figure 9, the distance between the tops of the East and West Corner Beam (Jiao Liang) is 41 chi, and the distance between the tops of the North and South Corner Beam is 41. 5 chi. This is the four boundaries of the building. With the addition of the set of beasts, the actual footprint of this hall should be slightly larger than this.
The ratio of the ridge to the total width of the hall is 292 to 492, or about 0. 593 to 1, which is close to 3 to 5. With the addition of tile, Taoshou (Roof-end Beast), and other elements, the ratio does not change significantly.
As in
Table 10, the building parameters are not scale-first to each other. For example, Tong MianKuo, Tong Jinshen, and the height parameter are a series of difference half-feet, close to a square, but not a pure square of exact proportions. The ratio of Principal ridge to total face width is close to 3 to 5, but not the classic ratio of the golden section. The construction of this hall is the architectural modulus first and integer values first, proportionality second.
6. Summary
This great hall has a Yingzao chi of 315. 48 mm, using the ancient Chinese system of large and small chi, each chi being 10 cun, or 12 small cun.
The architectural modulus is used. basic-module is 1 chi, i. e. , 12 small cun, which is the basic design unit. Half a chi, i. e. 6 small cun, is a sub-module, and 4 small cun is also a sub-module, which is used for openings, jia dao channels, various subsections in the height direction, Puzuo, etc. 0. 4 small cun is a sub-module, which is used for Cai, Dou, Gong, etc.
Architectural modulus is a distinctive feature of ancient Chinese architecture, not one that was introduced from the West after 1949, not one that has been developed after Corbusier since modern times. In conclusion, modern people have not surpassed the ancients in the use of architectural modulus.
The Puzuo has an outside jump of 32 small cun and an inside jump of 36 small cun. the total width of the nidao gong assembly is 28 small cun,Puzuo is 28 small cun wide. Puzuo is 44 small cun high. These parameters are the parameters under the coordination of architectural modulus. Yingzao Fashi takes the Cai-Fen System as its starting point,emphasis is placed on the standardisation and universality of Dou and Gong as parts, without focusing on the parameters of Puzuo. The two design ideas are different.
Taking the footprint of the Great Hall at the top of the four Corner Beams, it is 41. 5 chi deep from north to south and 41 chi wide from east to west. The main ridge is 292 small cuns long, a ratio of nearly 3 to 5 to the east-west breadth.
Ju zhe (Roof pitch grading) differs from Yingzao Fashi in that the approximate curve of the roof pitch is determined in two segments, and then adjustments are made to the individual jia dao. This method utilises an inner and outer post structure, with two segments spliced together.
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Data Availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this research as no data were generated or analysed.
References
- Huang Zi, editor. Yuan Dynasty Timber Architecture: Yanfu Temple. Compiled by Zhejiang Ancient Architecture Design and Research Institute. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press, 2013.
- Zhang Yaxuan. "An Analysis of the Architectural Framework of the Main Hall of Yanfu Temple in Wuyi. " Traditional Chinese Architecture and Gardens Technology, no. 2 (2020): 14–21.
- Lu Jiaxi, general editor. A History of Science and Technology in China: Volume on Measures and Weights. By Qiu Guangming et al. Beijing: Science Press, 2001.
- Wang Guixiang. Ten Books by Contemporary Chinese Architectural Historians: Wang Guixiang's Selected Essays on Chinese Architectural History. Shenyang: Liaoning Fine Arts Publishing House, 2013.
- Zhang Shiqing. Survey Analysis and Fundamental Research on the Main Hall of Baoguo Temple in Ningbo. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2012.
- Xu Yitao, et al. Architectural Archaeology Research of the Ji King Temple in Wanrong, Shanxi. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2016.
- Shanxi Zhongde Ancient Architecture Planning and Design Institute Co. , Ltd. Completion Report on the Restoration Project of Erxian Temple in Jincheng. Taiyuan: Beiyue Literature and Art Publishing House, 2019.
- Li Huizhi, Zhao Shuguang, and Zheng Linyou. "The Zhenze Erxian Temple in Xixi, Lingchuan, Shanxi. " Cultural Relics Quarterly, no. 2 (1998): 4-13, 15-30.
- Liu Chang, Zhang Rong, and Liu Yu. "Analysis of Architectural Historical Traces of the Rear Hall of Xixi Erxian Temple. " In Architectural History, vol. 11, edited by Wang Guixiang, 119-34. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2008.
- Liang Sicheng and Liu Dunzhen. "Survey Report on Ancient Architecture in Datong. " Bulletin of the Society for Research in Chinese Architecture 3-4 (1934): 1-70.
- Shanxi Zhongde Ancient Architecture Planning and Design Institute Co. , Ltd. Completion Report on the Restoration Project of Tangdi Temple in Dayang. Taiyuan: Beiyue Literature and Art Publishing House, 2019.
- Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China (MOHURD). *GB/T 50002-2013: Standard for Modular Coordination of Buildings*. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2013.
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).