Submitted:
22 November 2025
Posted:
26 November 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Macroscopic Manifestations of Quantum Entanglement
2.1. Superconducting Platforms
2.2. Optics and Optomechanics
2.3. Decoherence and Its Mitigation
- a)
- Cryogenic cooling: reducing thermal noise.
- b)
- Materials engineering: minimizing defects and local noise sources (Bylander et al. 2011).
- c)
- Active control: dynamical decoupling and real-time error correction (Terhal 2015).
2.4. Collective Modes and Criticality
2.5. Applications
3. Generalized Pathways and Frontier Applications
3.1. Integrated Quantum Devices
3.2. Quantum Imaging and Sensing
3.3. Quantum-Inspired Modeling Tools
3.4. Challenges and Future Directions
4. Discussion and Responses to Core Critiques
4.1. Decoherence
4.2. Metaphorical Limits
4.3. Computational Complexity
4.4. Multiscale Approaches
5. Conclusion and Outlook
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Aspelmeyer, M., T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt (2014). “Cavity optomechanics”. In: Reviews of Modern Physics 86.4, pp. 1391-1452.
- Busemeyer, J. R. and P. D. Bruza (2012). Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision. Cambridge University Press.
- Bylander, J.; et al. (2011). “Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit”. In: Nature Physics 7.7, pp. 565-570. [CrossRef]
- Cichocki, A.; et al. (2016). “Tensor networks for dimensionality reduction and large-scale optimization”. In: Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning 9.4-5, pp. 249-429.
- Clarke, J. and F. K. Wilhelm (2008). “Superconducting quantum bits”. In: Nature 453.7198, pp. 1031–1042.
- Débarre, D.; et al. (2023). “Quantum mutual information for biological networks”. In: Journal of Theoretical Biology 563, p. 111126.
- Degen, C. L., F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro (2017). “Quantum sensing”. In: Reviews of Modern Physics 89.3, p. 035002.
- Einstein, A. , B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen (1935). “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?” In: Physical Review 47.10, pp. 777–780. [CrossRef]
- Eisert, Jens, Marcus Cramer, and Martin B. Plenio (2010). “Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy”. In: Reviews of Modern Physics 82.1, pp. 277–306. [CrossRef]
- Fiedor, P. (2014). “Mutual information in stock market networks”. In: European Physical Journal B 87.1, p. 57.
- Fröwis, F. and W. Dür (2012). “Measures of macroscopicity for quantum spin systems”. In: New Journal of Physics 14, p. 093039. [CrossRef]
- Gambetta, J. M., J. M. Chow, and M. Steffen (2020). “Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system”. In: Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 11, pp. 231–252. [CrossRef]
- Hensen, B.; et al. (2015). “Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 km”. In: Nature 526, pp. 682–686. [CrossRef]
- Horodecki, R.; et al. (2009). “Quantum entanglement”. In: Reviews of Modern Physics 81.2, pp. 865–942.
- Joos, E. and H. D. Zeh (1985). “The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment”. In: Zeitschrift für Physik B 59, pp. 223–243. [CrossRef]
- Khandwala, D.; et al. (2022). “Quantum metasurfaces for multi-photon entanglement”. In: Nature 603, pp. 623–628.
- Kimble, H. J. (2008). “The quantum internet”. In: Nature 453.7198, pp. 1023–1030.
- Kjaergaard, M.; et al. (2020). “Superconducting qubits: Current state of play”. In: Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 11, pp. 369–395. [CrossRef]
- Leggett, A. J. and A. Garg (1985). “Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism”. In: Physical Review Letters 54, pp. 857–860.
- Lvovsky, A. I.; et al. (2013). “Observation of micro–macro entanglement of light”. In: Nature Physics 9.7, pp. 541–544.
- Nielsen, M. A. and I. L. Chuang (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.
- Nimmrichter, S. and K. Hornberger (2013). “Macroscopicity of mechanical superposition states”. In: Physical Review Letters 110, p. 160403.
- Ockeloen-Korppi, C. F.; et al. (2018). “Stabilized entanglement of massive mechanical oscillators”. In: Nature 556.7702, pp. 478–482. [CrossRef]
- Osterloh, A.; et al. (2002). “Scaling of entanglement close to a quantum phase transition”. In: Nature 416, pp. 608–610. [CrossRef]
- Palomaki, T. A.; et al. (2013). “Entangling mechanical motion with microwave fields”. In: Nature 495.7440, pp. 210–214. [CrossRef]
- Pothos, E. M. and J. R. Busemeyer (2009). “Quantum probability theory explains human probability judgment errors”. In: PNAS 106.33, pp. 17951–17956.
- Shalm, L. K.; et al. (2015). “Strong loophole-free test of local realism”. In: Physical Review Letters 115, p. 250402. [CrossRef]
- Tegmark, M. (2016). “Improved measures of integrated information”. In: PLoS Computational Biology 12.11, e1005123. [CrossRef]
- Terhal, Barbara M. (2015). “Quantum error correction for quantum memories”. In: Reviews of Modern Physics 87.2, pp. 307–346.
- Ulanowicz, R. E. (1997). Ecology, the Ascendent Perspective. Columbia University Press. Wang, F. et al. (2019). “Super-resolving quantum imaging with entangled photons”. In: Light: Science & Applications 8, p. 104.
- Zurek, W. H. (2003). “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical”.In: Reviews of Modern Physics 75.3, pp. 715–775. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).