Submitted:
17 November 2025
Posted:
18 November 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Mixing
2.3. Rheology
2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy
2.5. Design of Experiments
2.6. PLA Substrate Preparation
2.7. Test Coatings & Basic Testing
2.8. Device Fabrication
2.9. Silver and Gold Recovery
2.10. ICP-MS
2.11. Enzyme Functionalisation
2.12. Electrochemical Testing
2.13. Life-Cycle Assessment
3. Results
3.1. Ink Binder Selection
3.2. Silver Ink Development
| Ink parameter | JMP17 predicted formulation | Experimental data |
|---|---|---|
| Ink viscosity @ 1.5 s−1 (Pa.s) | 44.5 | 41.5 |
| Viscosity recovery (%) | 83.1 | 87.6 |
| Resistivity (Ω·cm) | 5.66 × 10−5 | 5.30 × 10−5 |
3.3. Gold Ink Development
3.4. Silver and Gold Recovery
3.5. Sensor Fabrication
3.6. Functionalisation & Electrochemical Testing
3.7. Environmental Impact Assessment
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| MDPI | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
| PLA | Polylactic acid |
| WE | Working Electrode |
| CE | Counter Electrode |
| RE | Reference Electrode |
| PE | Printed Electronics |
| EU | European Union |
| PET | Polyethylene terephthalate |
| Mw | Weight average molecular weight |
| Mn | Number average molecular weight |
| DAC | Dual-Axis Centrifuge |
| QC | Quality Control |
| ISO | International Standards organisation |
| LCA | Life Cycle Assessment |
| GOx | Glucose Oxidase |
| SPE | Screen Printed Electrodes |
| EF | Environmental Footprint |
| CC | Climate Change |
| OD | Ozone Depletion |
| IR | Ionising Radiation |
| POF | Photochemical Ozone Formation |
| PM | Particulate Matter |
| HTNc | Non-carcinogenic human toxicity |
| HTc | Carcinogenic human toxicity |
| A | Acidification |
| Ef | Eutrophication freshwater |
| Em | Eutrophication marine |
| Et | Eutrophication terrestrial |
| E | Ecotoxicity freshwater |
| LU | Land use |
| WU | Water use |
| RUF | Fossil resource use |
| RUMM | Mineral and metal resource use |
| CA | Cellulose Acetate |
| PCL | Polycaprolactone |
| RSq | R squared |
| DoE | Design of Experiments |
| EIS | Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy |
| PGMEA | Propylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate |
| VOC | Volatile Organic Compound |
| EoL | End-of-Life |
| ICP-MS | Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry |
| RCT | Charge transfer resistance |
| CDL | Double layer capacitance |
| RH | Relative Humidity |
References
- A. Singh et al., ‘Recent Advances in Electrochemical Biosensors: Applications, Challenges, and Future Scope’, Biosensors, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 336, Sept. 2021. [CrossRef]
- S. Munir, B. Ali, and S. Gul, ‘The advancements of 3D-printed electrodes in electrochemistry’, Discov. Electrochem., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 14, Dec. 2024. [CrossRef]
- I. Maksimov, T. Asakai, and M. Ohata, ‘On the optimal use of silver–silver chloride reference electrodes’, Accreditation Qual. Assur., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 65–68, Apr. 2023. [CrossRef]
- M. Zamani, V. Yang, L. Maziashvili, G. Fan, C. M. Klapperich, and A. L. Furst, ‘Surface Requirements for Optimal Biosensing with Disposable Gold Electrodes’, ACS Meas. Sci. Au, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 91–95, Apr. 2022. [CrossRef]
- M. Pimpilova, ‘A brief review on methods and materials for electrode modification: electroanalytical applications towards biologically relevant compounds’, Discov. Electrochem., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 12, Dec. 2024. [CrossRef]
- S. Kursunoglu, ‘A Review on the Recovery of Critical Metals from Mine and Mineral Processing Tailings: Recent Advances’, J. Sustain. Metall., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2023–2050, 2025. [CrossRef]
- N. Tsepina, S. Kolesnikov, T. Minnikova, A. Timoshenko, and K. Kazeev, ‘Soil Contamination by Silver and Assessment of Its Ecotoxicity’, Rev. Agric. Sci., vol. 10, no. 0, pp. 186–205, 2022. [CrossRef]
- K. Vogel et al., ‘Defining and Achieving Next-Generation Green Electronics: A Perspective on Best Practices Through the Lens of Hybrid Printed Electronics’, IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 117135–117161, 2025. [CrossRef]
- P. J. Obeid et al., ‘Designs and Materials of Electrodes for Electrochemical Sensors’, ChemElectroChem, vol. 12, no. 19, p. e202500230, Oct. 2025. [CrossRef]
- ‘Why A Weakening Dollar Has Investors Eyeing Gold And Silver’. Accessed: Nov. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesfinancecouncil/2025/10/30/why-a-weakening-dollar-has-investors-eyeing-gold-and-silver/.
- ‘Silver Soars: Industrial Demand Drives Structural Shift—Mining Technology Insights’. Accessed: Nov. 03, 2025. Available: https://miningtechnologyinsights.com/2025/10/04/silver-soars-industrial-demand-drives-structural-shift/.
- ‘Silver Price History’. Accessed: Nov. 03, 2025. Available: https://silverprice.org/silver-price-history.html.
- ‘Gold Price History’. Accessed: Nov. 03, 2025. Available: https://goldprice.org/gold-price-chart.html.
- L. E. N. Gamage et al., ‘Recycling of Gold and Silver from Electronic Waste—A Review’, Mater. Circ. Econ., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 8, Dec. 2023. [CrossRef]
- P. Phogat, S. Kumar, and M. Wan, ‘A scientometrics study of advancing sustainable metal recovery from e-waste: processes, challenges, and future directions’, RSC Sustain., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 2434–2454, 2025. [CrossRef]
- ‘Waste statistics—electrical and electronic equipment—Statistics Explained—Eurostat’. Accessed: Nov. 06, 2025. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Waste_statistics_-_electrical_and_electronic_equipment.
- ‘Silver prices surge amid shortage’. Accessed: Nov. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.marketplace.org/story/2025/10/21/silver-prices-surge-amid-shortage.
- ‘Document 32021H2279—Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 of 15 December 2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations’. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2279/oj/eng.
- I. D. Williams and O. S. Shittu, ‘Development of sustainable electronic products, business models and designs using circular economy thinking’, Detritus, no. 21, pp. 45–54, Dec. 2022. [CrossRef]
- M. E. Keal et al., ‘Design for recycle of devices to ensure efficient recovery of technology critical metals’, RSC Sustain., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 2455–2471, 2025. [CrossRef]
- Y. Wang et al., ‘Flexible printed circuit board based on graphene/polyimide composites with excellent thermal conductivity and sandwich structure’, Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 138, p. 106075, Nov. 2020. [CrossRef]
- I. A. De Araujo Andreotti et al., ‘Disposable and flexible electrochemical sensor made by recyclable material and low cost conductive ink’, J. Electroanal. Chem., vol. 840, pp. 109–116, May 2019. [CrossRef]
- Z. Terzopoulou, A. Zamboulis, N. D. Bikiaris, E. Xanthopoulou, R. O. Ioannidis, and D. N. Bikiaris, ‘A decade of innovation: Synthesis, properties and applications of PLA copolymers’, Prog. Polym. Sci., vol. 167, p. 101991, Aug. 2025. [CrossRef]
- L. Shen, E. Worrell, and M. K. Patel, ‘Comparing life cycle energy and GHG emissions of bio-based PET, recycled PET, PLA, and man-made cellulosics’, Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 625–639, Nov. 2012. [CrossRef]
- J. Mettakoonpitak et al., ‘Simple biodegradable plastic screen-printing for microfluidic paper-based analytical devices’, Sens. Actuators B Chem., vol. 331, p. 129463, Mar. 2021. [CrossRef]
- E. Palmieri, R. Cancelliere, F. Maita, L. Micheli, and L. Maiolo, ‘An ethyl cellulose novel biodegradable flexible substrate material for sustainable screen-printing’, RSC Adv., vol. 14, no. 25, pp. 18103–18108, 2024. [CrossRef]
- P.-L. Kang et al., ‘A Facile Fabrication of Biodegradable and Biocompatible Cross-Linked Gelatin as Screen Printing Substrates’, Polymers, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 1186, May 2020. [CrossRef]
- ‘Ail Arian—Reusable Silver Conductive Inks’. Accessed: Nov. 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.ailarian.co.uk/.
- R. S. Shergill, P. Bhatia, L. Johnstone, and B. A. Patel, ‘Eco-Friendly Approach to Making 3D-Printed Electrochemical Sensors’, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 416–422, Jan. 2024. [CrossRef]
- M. Räikkönen, L. Sokka, L. Hepo--oja, S. Nordman, and T. M. Kraft, ‘Sustainable Production Insight Through LCA and LCC Analysis of Injection Overmolded Structural Electronics Manufactured through Roll--to--Roll Processes’, Glob. Chall., vol. 7, no. 11, p. 2300015, Nov. 2023. [CrossRef]
- J. Zikulnig, S. Carrara, and J. Kosel, ‘A life cycle assessment approach to minimize environmental impact for sustainable printed sensors’, Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 10866, 2025. [CrossRef]
- T. M. Prenzel, F. Gehring, F. Fuhs, and S. Albrecht, ‘Influence of design properties of printed electronics on their environmental profile’, Matér. Tech., vol. 109, no. 5–6, p. 506, 2021. [CrossRef]
- R. O. Ioannidis, Z. Terzopoulou, A. Zamboulis, N. D. Bikiaris, M. J. Noordam, and N. Nikolaidis, ‘Novel biobased, flexible blocky copolyesters based on poly(lactic acid) and poly(ethylene azelate)’, Mater. Adv., vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 2975–2989, 2025. [CrossRef]
- R. O. Ioannidis, P. A. Klonos, Z. Terzopoulou, N. Nikolaidis, A. Kyritsis, and D. D. Bikiaris, ‘Thermodynamic investigation of renewable block copolymers based on poly(lactic acid) and poly(ethylene azelate)’, Soft Matter, vol. 21, no. 33, pp. 6613–6626, 2025. [CrossRef]
- Y. Ma et al., ‘How Biaxial Flow Modulates Crystal Nucleation Behavior in Poly(lactic acid)’, Macromolecules, vol. 58, no. 14, pp. 7219–7229, July 2025. [CrossRef]
- E. Luoma et al., ‘Oriented and annealed poly(lactic acid) films and their performance in flexible printed and hybrid electronics’, J. Plast. Film Sheeting, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 429–462, Oct. 2021. [CrossRef]
- A.-M. Gorman, A. Clayton, T. O’Connell, and D. Johnson, ‘A recyclable screen ink with state-of-the-art performance developed using a bottom-up, safety and sustainability-driven approach’, MRS Adv., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 311–316, Feb. 2023. [CrossRef]
- ISO 14040:2006—Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework, ISO, July 2006. Accessed: Nov. 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html.
- ISO 14044:2006—Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines, ISO, July 2006. Accessed: Nov. 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html.
- G. Wernet, C. Bauer, B. Steubing, J. Reinhard, E. Moreno-Ruiz, and B. Weidema, ‘The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology’, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1218–1230, Sept. 2016. [CrossRef]
- T. Langhorst, B. Winter, D. Roskosch, and A. Bardow, ‘Stoichiometry-Based Estimation of Climate Impacts of Emerging Chemical Processes: Method Benchmarking and Recommendations’, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., vol. 11, no. 17, pp. 6600–6609, May 2023. [CrossRef]
- N. Yadav and M. Hakkarainen, ‘Degradable or not? Cellulose acetate as a model for complicated interplay between structure, environment and degradation’, Chemosphere, vol. 265, p. 128731, Feb. 2021. [CrossRef]
- Y. Wang, M. Dai, G. Luo, J. Fan, J. H. Clark, and S. Zhang, ‘Preparation and Application of Green Sustainable Solvent Cyrene’, Chemistry, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2322–2346, Oct. 2023. [CrossRef]
- M. A. Ntrivala et al., ‘Polycaprolactone (PCL): the biodegradable polyester shaping the future of materials—a review on synthesis, properties, biodegradation, applications and future perspectives’, Eur. Polym. J., vol. 234, p. 114033, June 2025. [CrossRef]
- K. R. Choi, Z. W. Luo, G. B. Kim, H. Xu, and S. Y. Lee, ‘A microbial process for the production of benzyl acetate’, Nat. Chem. Eng., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 216–228, Feb. 2024. [CrossRef]
- ‘Merck | United Kingdom | Life Science Products & Service Solutions’. Accessed: Nov. 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/GB/en.
- S. Schlisske et al., ‘Ink Formulation for Printed Organic Electronics: Investigating Effects of Aggregation on Structure and Rheology of Functional Inks Based on Conjugated Polymers in Mixed Solvents’, Adv. Mater. Technol., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 2000335, Feb. 2021. [CrossRef]
- R. F. Voss, R. B. Laibowitz, and E. I. Alessandrini, ‘Percolation and fractal properties of thin gold films’, in The Mathematics and Physics of Disordered Media: Percolation, Random Walk, Modeling, and Simulation, vol. 1035, B. D. Hughes and B. W. Ninham, Eds, in Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1035. , Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1983, pp. 153–168. [CrossRef]
- P. S. Stephanou, ‘Variable entanglement density constitutive rheological model for polymeric fluids’, Rheol. Acta, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 379–395, May 2024. [CrossRef]
- ‘LOCTITE-ECI-1010-EC-en_GL’. Accessed: Nov. 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://datasheets.tdx.henkel.com/LOCTITE-ECI-1010-EC-en_GL.pdf.
- P. K. Summers, R. Wuhrer, and A. M. McDonagh, ‘Electrically conductive gold films formed by sintering of gold nanoparticles at room temperature initiated by ozone’, J. Nanoparticle Res., vol. 26, no. 5, p. 97, May 2024. [CrossRef]
- ‘Dycotec-DM-AUP-14040-Datasheet-1.04-1’. Accessed: Nov. 06, 2025. Available: https://www.dycotecmaterials.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Dycotec-DM-AUP-14040-Datasheet-1.04-1.pdf.
- ‘Print Settings | V-One | Voltera Docs’. Accessed: Nov. 06, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://docs.voltera.io/docs/v-one/learn-v-one/software-overview/print-settings.
- ‘Allen J. Bard and Larry R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, New York: Wiley, 2001, 2nd ed.’, Russ. J. Electrochem., vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 1364–1365, Dec. 2002. [CrossRef]


















| Inputs | Outputs |
|---|---|
| Silver loading, 60–80 wt% | Low-shear viscosity (1.5 s−1) |
| Cellulose acetate 30 kDa (CA30K), 0–6 wt% | Viscosity recovery (%) |
| Cellulose acetate 50 kDa (CA50K), 0–1.33 wt% | Resistivity (Ω·cm) |
| Test | 10 g scale, virgin silver |
10 g scale, recycled silver |
2 g scale, virgin gold | 2 g scale, recycled gold |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ink viscosity @ 1.5 s−1 (Pa.s) | 41.5 | 45.2 | - | - |
| Viscosity recovery (%) | 87.6 | 10.7 | - | - |
| Resistivity (Ω·cm) | 5.30 × 10−5 | 2.72 × 10−5 | 4.92 × 10−2 | 5.64 × 10−3 |
| Property | Loctite ECI 1010 silver screen ink | Virgin silver screen ink | Recycled silver screen ink |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resistivity ( Ω·cm) | 1.43 × 10−5 | 5.30 × 10−5 | 2.72 × 10−5 |
| Silver content (wt%) | 62 | 62 | 62 |
| Drying temperature (°C) | 120 | 120 | 120 |
| Property | DM-AUP-14040S gold screen ink | Virgin gold Voltera ink | Recycled gold Voltera ink |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resistivity (Ω·cm ) | 5.6 × 10−6 | 4.92 × 10−2 | 5.64 × 10−3 |
| Gold content (wt%) | 81–83 | 90.5 | 90.5 |
| Drying temperature (°C) | 150 | Ambient | Ambient |
| Sintering temperature (°C) | 850 | Not required | Not required |
| Electrode | Geometrical area (mm2) | Electroactive area (mm2) | Variability, n=3 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base0—Baseline device | 1 | 0.45 | 6.08 |
| Sensor1—PET virgin Ag virgin Au | 1 | 2.51 | 53.36 |
| Sensor2—PET recycled Ag recycled Au | 1 | 4.55 | 91.68 |
| Sensor3—PLA virgin Ag virgin Au | 1 | 1.68 | 15.99 |
| Sensor4—PLA recycled gen Ag recycled Au (novel device) | 1 | 4.50 | 15.24 |
| Input/Output | Baseline device | Novel device | Unit | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Alumina substrate | 0.69 | - | g |
| PLA substrate | - | 0.57 | g | |
| Gold ink | 2.09 × 10−2 | 1.65 × 10−3 | g | |
| Silver ink | 5.10 × 10−2 | 2.00 × 10−2 | g | |
| Dielectric ink | 0.10 | 9.88 × 10−2 | g | |
| Cyclohexanone | 0.14 | - | g | |
| PGMEA | 0.29 | - | g | |
| Terpineol | 0.28 | - | g | |
| Energy | Electricity for circuit printing | 1.56 × 10−2 | 1.56 × 10−2 | kWh |
| Electricity for gold ink curing | 1.40 × 10−2 | 1.50 × 10−3 | kWh | |
| Electricity for curing other inks | 9.60 × 10−3 | kWh | ||
| Electricity for ventilation | 8.00 × 10−4 | 8.00 × 10−4 | kWh | |
| Electricity for laser cutting | N/A | 4.50 × 10−4 | kWh | |
| Output | VOC emissions from inks | 3.16 × 10−2 | 6.41 × 10−2 | g |
| Substrate scraps | 3.43 × 10−2 | 2.86 × 10−2 | g | |
| Biosensor EoL, incineration | 0.79 | 0.36 | g | |
| Biosensor EoL, recycling | - | 0.24 | g | |
| Full biosensor | 1 (7.94 × 10−1 g) | 1 (6.00 × 10−1 g) | unit | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).