Submitted:
10 November 2025
Posted:
12 November 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Soil Analysis
2.3. Arboreal and Bats Diversity
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Soil Characterization
3.2. Bats and Arboreal Diversity
3.3. Correlations Between Non-Herbaceous Plant and Bats Diversity and Soil Nutrients
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| MDPI | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
| DOAJ | Directory of open access journals |
| TLA | Three letter acronym |
| LD | Linear dichroism |
Appendix A
| Crop type | Variable | n | Mean | S.D. | S.E. | V.C. | Mín. | Máx. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cocoa plantations | ph | 6 | 5,73 | 0,02 | 0,01 | 0,35 | 5,71 | 5,75 |
| OM(%) | 6 | 8,34 | 0,03 | 0,02 | 0,36 | 8,31 | 8,37 | |
| N(%) | 6 | 0,42 | 0,02 | 0,01 | 4,76 | 0,4 | 0,44 | |
| P(ppm) | 6 | 3,9 | 0,3 | 0,17 | 7,69 | 3,6 | 4,2 | |
| K(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 0,32 | 0,03 | 0,02 | 9,38 | 0,29 | 0,35 | |
| Ca(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 5,07 | 0,03 | 0,02 | 0,59 | 5,04 | 5,1 | |
| Mg(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 0,65 | 0,01 | 0,01 | 1,54 | 0,64 | 0,66 | |
| Fe(ppm) | 6 | 272,8 | 0,1 | 0,06 | 0,04 | 272,7 | 272,9 | |
| Mn(ppm) | 6 | 9,89 | 0,01 | 0,01 | 0,1 | 9,88 | 9,9 | |
| Cu(ppm) | 6 | 7,36 | 0,03 | 0,02 | 0,41 | 7,33 | 7,39 | |
| Zn(ppm) | 6 | 5,3 | 0,3 | 0,17 | 5,66 | 5 | 5,6 | |
| CiC | 6 | 21,68 | 0,02 | 0,01 | 0,09 | 21,66 | 21,7 | |
| Humidity % | 6 | 33,12 | 0,02 | 0,01 | 0,06 | 33,1 | 33,14 | |
| Sand | 6 | 47 | 1 | 0,58 | 2,13 | 46 | 48 | |
| Silt | 6 | 43 | 1 | 0,58 | 2,33 | 42 | 44 | |
| Clay | 6 | 10 | 2 | 1,15 | 20 | 8 | 12 | |
| Live fence of Erythrina spp. | ph | 6 | 6,09 | 0,05 | 0,03 | 0,81 | 6,03 | 6,12 |
| OM(%) | 6 | 4,54 | 0,84 | 0,49 | 18,57 | 3,87 | 5,49 | |
| N(%) | 6 | 0,22 | 0,04 | 0,02 | 18,64 | 0,19 | 0,27 | |
| P(ppm) | 6 | 4,23 | 1,1 | 0,63 | 25,91 | 3,6 | 5,5 | |
| K(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 0,32 | 0,15 | 0,09 | 48,24 | 0,15 | 0,45 | |
| Ca(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 6,66 | 2,58 | 1,49 | 38,76 | 4,68 | 9,58 | |
| Mg(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 1,07 | 0,36 | 0,21 | 34,18 | 0,74 | 1,46 | |
| Fe(ppm) | 6 | 425,2 | 16,48 | 9,51 | 3,88 | 406,5 | 437,6 | |
| Mn(ppm) | 6 | 11,61 | 0,93 | 0,54 | 8 | 10,55 | 12,29 | |
| Cu(ppm) | 6 | 5,63 | 0,24 | 0,14 | 4,32 | 5,37 | 5,85 | |
| Zn(ppm) | 6 | 10,14 | 0,29 | 0,17 | 2,85 | 9,83 | 10,4 | |
| CiC | 6 | 17,98 | 5,86 | 3,38 | 32,57 | 11,22 | 21,48 | |
| Humidity % | 6 | 33,31 | 1,87 | 1,08 | 5,6 | 31,44 | 35,17 | |
| Sand | 6 | 40 | 7,21 | 4,16 | 18,03 | 34 | 48 | |
| Silt | 6 | 45,33 | 2,52 | 1,45 | 5,55 | 43 | 48 | |
| Clay | 6 | 16 | 4,36 | 2,52 | 27,24 | 11 | 19 | |
| Polyspecific live fence | ph | 6 | 6,07 | 0,08 | 0,04 | 1,25 | 5,98 | 6,12 |
| OM(%) | 6 | 12,5 | 2,93 | 1,69 | 23,42 | 9,43 | 15,26 | |
| N(%) | 6 | 0,62 | 0,15 | 0,08 | 23,38 | 0,47 | 0,76 | |
| P(ppm) | 6 | 4,17 | 0,25 | 0,15 | 6,04 | 3,9 | 4,4 | |
| K(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 0,6 | 0,27 | 0,15 | 44,54 | 0,32 | 0,85 | |
| Ca(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 12,74 | 3,24 | 1,87 | 25,39 | 9,53 | 16 | |
| Mg(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 2,22 | 0,49 | 0,28 | 22,02 | 1,92 | 2,78 | |
| Fe(ppm) | 6 | 160,2 | 31,03 | 17,92 | 19,37 | 133 | 194 | |
| Mn(ppm) | 6 | 10,91 | 2,12 | 1,23 | 19,48 | 9,57 | 13,36 | |
| Cu(ppm) | 6 | 6,57 | 0,35 | 0,2 | 5,32 | 6,28 | 6,96 | |
| Zn(ppm) | 6 | 11,72 | 2,73 | 1,58 | 23,28 | 9,17 | 14,6 | |
| CiC | 6 | 25,95 | 7,15 | 4,13 | 27,57 | 17,69 | 30,14 | |
| Humidity % | 6 | 45,8 | 2,57 | 1,48 | 5,61 | 43,23 | 48,37 | |
| Sand | 6 | 46 | 2 | 1,15 | 4,35 | 44 | 48 | |
| Silt | 6 | 43,33 | 1,53 | 0,88 | 3,53 | 42 | 45 | |
| Clay | 6 | 10,67 | 2,89 | 1,67 | 27,06 | 9 | 14 | |
| Mixed plantations | ph | 6 | 5,88 | 0,02 | 0,01 | 0,34 | 5,86 | 5,9 |
| OM(%) | 6 | 9,49 | 0,01 | 0,01 | 0,11 | 9,48 | 9,5 | |
| N(%) | 6 | 0,47 | 0,03 | 0,02 | 6,38 | 0,44 | 0,5 | |
| P(ppm) | 6 | 6,2 | 0,2 | 0,12 | 3,23 | 6 | 6,4 | |
| K(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 1,01 | 0,01 | 0,01 | 0,99 | 1 | 1,02 | |
| Ca(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 12,7 | 0,7 | 0,4 | 5,51 | 12 | 13,4 | |
| Mg(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 1,55 | 0,05 | 0,03 | 3,23 | 1,5 | 1,6 | |
| Fe(ppm) | 6 | 286 | 4 | 2,31 | 1,4 | 282 | 290 | |
| Mn(ppm) | 6 | 15,43 | 0,03 | 0,02 | 0,19 | 15,4 | 15,46 | |
| Cu(ppm) | 6 | 7,05 | 0,15 | 0,09 | 2,13 | 6,9 | 7,2 | |
| Zn(ppm) | 6 | 19,83 | 0,04 | 0,02 | 0,2 | 19,79 | 19,87 | |
| CiC | 6 | 22,98 | 0,02 | 0,01 | 0,09 | 22,96 | 23 | |
| Humidity % | 6 | 43,74 | 0,1 | 0,06 | 0,23 | 43,64 | 43,84 | |
| Sand | 6 | 33 | 1 | 0,58 | 3,03 | 32 | 34 | |
| Silt | 6 | 57,67 | 1,53 | 0,88 | 2,65 | 56 | 59 | |
| Clay | 6 | 9,33 | 1,15 | 0,67 | 12,37 | 8 | 10 | |
| Scattered trees in pastures | ph | 6 | 6,1 | 0,08 | 0,05 | 1,34 | 6,03 | 6,19 |
| OM(%) | 6 | 5,84 | 2,75 | 1,59 | 47,12 | 3,28 | 8,75 | |
| N(%) | 6 | 0,3 | 0,13 | 0,08 | 44,51 | 0,18 | 0,44 | |
| P(ppm) | 6 | 7,6 | 6,93 | 4 | 91,16 | 3,6 | 15,6 | |
| K(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 0,6 | 0,45 | 0,26 | 74,81 | 0,3 | 1,11 | |
| Ca(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 6,49 | 0,96 | 0,55 | 14,72 | 5,53 | 7,44 | |
| Mg(cOMl/Kg) | 6 | 0,85 | 0,13 | 0,07 | 14,74 | 0,73 | 0,98 | |
| Fe(ppm) | 6 | 335,73 | 98,09 | 56,63 | 29,22 | 275 | 448,9 | |
| Mn(ppm) | 6 | 11,18 | 1,78 | 1,03 | 15,96 | 9,2 | 12,66 | |
| Cu(ppm) | 6 | 5,99 | 1,15 | 0,66 | 19,11 | 4,79 | 7,07 | |
| Zn(ppm) | 6 | 12,05 | 3,21 | 1,85 | 26,65 | 8,36 | 14,2 | |
| CiC | 6 | 21,74 | 1,26 | 0,73 | 5,79 | 20,48 | 23 | |
| Humidity % | 6 | 31,42 | 9,63 | 5,56 | 30,66 | 20,33 | 37,74 | |
| Sand | 6 | 32 | 5,29 | 3,06 | 16,54 | 28 | 38 | |
| Silt | 6 | 48,67 | 3,51 | 2,03 | 7,22 | 45 | 52 | |
| Clay | 6 | 22,67 | 3,79 | 2,19 | 16,7 | 20 | 27 |
Appendix B
| Bat species | Cocoa Plantations | Mixed Plantations | Scattered trees in pastures | Polyspecific live fences | Live fences of Erythrina | Abundance relative |
| Glossophaga soricina | 8 | 9 | 4 | 16 | 2 | 20,2 |
| Carollia brevicauda | 2 | 21 | 10 | 17,1 | ||
| Uroderma convexum | 6 | 6 | 12 | 3 | 14,0 | |
| Carollia perspicillata | 3 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 13,0 |
| Sturnira bakeri | 1 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 10,9 |
| Myotis nigricans | 12 | 6,2 | ||||
| Artibeus aequatorialis | 2 | 5 | 1 | 4,1 | ||
| Chiroderma villosum | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3,6 | ||
| Vampyriscus nymphaea | 4 | 3 | 3,6 | |||
| Artibeus ravus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2,6 | |
| Chiroderma sp. | 1 | 1 | 1,0 | |||
| Chiroderma trinitatum | 1 | 1 | 1,0 | |||
| Gardnerycteris keenani | 1 | 1 | 1,0 | |||
| Micronicterys hirsuta | 1 | 0,5 | ||||
| Sturnira ludovici | 1 | 0,5 | ||||
| Trachops cirrhosus | 1 | 0,5 | ||||
| Richness | 6 | 13 | 5 | 12 | 8 | |
| Adundance | 21 | 58 | 24 | 74 | 16 | |
| Dominance_D | 0,2238 | 0,1779 | 0,3007 | 0,1237 | 0,09167 | |
| Simpson_1-D | 0,7762 | 0,8221 | 0,6993 | 0,8763 | 0,9083 | |
| Simpson 1/D | 4,468275246 | 5,621135469 | 3,325573661 | 8,084074373 | 10,90869423 | |
| Shannon_H | 1,637 | 2,114 | 1,395 | 2,228 | 2,2 |
Appendix C
| Plant species | Cocoa plantations | Mixed plantations | Scattered trees in pastures | Polyspecific live fences | Life fences of Erythrina | Relative abundance |
| Erythrina smithiana | 0 | 0 | 16 | 128 | 317 | 29,251269 |
| Theobroma cacao | 198 | 78 | 4 | 33 | 0 | 19,860406 |
| Cordia alliodora | 0 | 0 | 47 | 157 | 0 | 12,944162 |
| Erithryna poeppigiana | 0 | 0 | 14 | 66 | 0 | 5,0761421 |
| Spondias mombin | 0 | 0 | 22 | 53 | 0 | 4,7588832 |
| Musa paradisiaca | 0 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,8705584 |
| Citrus sinensis | 0 | 0 | 10 | 25 | 0 | 2,2208122 |
| Citrus aurantium | 0 | 27 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1,9670051 |
| Citrus reticulata | 0 | 0 | 4 | 23 | 0 | 1,713198 |
| Jathropa curcas | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 1,6497462 |
| Manihot sculenta | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,5228426 |
| Gliricidia sepium | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 1,2690355 |
| Annona muricata | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 1,2690355 |
| Erythrina poeppigiana | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 1,2055838 |
| Guadua sp. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 1,0152284 |
| Coffea canephora | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 1,0152284 |
| Phyllantus juglandifolius | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0,8883249 |
| Carica papaya | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0,8883249 |
| Iriartea deltoidea | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 0,8248731 |
| Helicostylis tovarensis | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 0,8248731 |
| Persea americana | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0,7614213 |
| Annona cherimola | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0,7614213 |
| Tabebuia sp. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0,6345178 |
| Ficus sp. | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0,6345178 |
| Baccharis sp. | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0,6345178 |
| Attalea colenda | 0 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0,6345178 |
| Cecropia sp. | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0,3807107 |
| Aegiphilia alba | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0,3807107 |
| Coffea arabiga caturra | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0,3172589 |
| Psidium guajaba | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0,2538071 |
| Citrus limonia | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0,1903553 |
| Artocarpus altilis | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0,1903553 |
| Undeterminated | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0,1269036 |
| Inga sp. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0,0634518 |
| Richness | 1 | 5 | 19 | 28 | 1 | |
| Abndance | 198 | 199 | 173 | 689 | 317 | |
| Dominance_D | 1 | 0,28 | 0,12 | 0,11 | 1 | |
| Simpson_1-D | 0 | 0,72 | 0,88 | 0,89 | 0 | |
| Simpson 1/D | 1 | 3,58 | 8,45 | 8,98 | 1 | |
| Shannon_H | 0 | 1,41 | 2,51 | 2,65 | 0 |
References
- Sierra, R.; Tirado, M.; Palacios, W. Forest-cover changes from labor- and capital-intensive commercial logging in the southern Chocó rainforests. Prof. Geogr. 2003, 55, 477–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pozo-Rivera, W.E. Relaciones de la diversidad arbórea y la estructura del paisaje agrícola tropical ecuatoriano con la biodiversidad de murciélagos filostómidos. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de La Habana, 2017.
- Pozo-Rivera, W.E.; Cárdenas-Tello, C.D.; Echeverría, A.; Berovides-Álvarez, V.; Ricardo-Nápoles, N. Efecto de la estructura del paisaje agrícola en la diversidad arbórea. Bol. Téc. Ser. Zool. 2017, 13, 14–20. [Google Scholar]
- Pozo-Rivera, W.E.; Martin-Solano, S.; Carrillo-Bilbao, G. Response of phyllostomid bat diversity to tree cover types in north-western Ecuador. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 22987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medina, A.; Harvey, C.A.; Sanchez-Melo, D.; Vilchez, S.; Hernández, B. Bat diversity and movements in an agricultural landscape in Matiguás, Nicaragua. Biotropica 2007, 39, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-García, J.L.; Santos-Moreno, A. Efectos de la estructura del paisaje y de la vegetación en la diversidad de murciélagos filostómidos (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) de Oaxaca, México. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2014, 62, 217–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holdridge, L. Ecología basada en zonas de vida; IICA: San José, Costa Rica, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Pech-Canche, J.M.; MacSwiney, C.; Estrella, E. Importancia de los detectores ultrasónicos para mejorar los inventarios de murciélagos Neotropicales. Therya 2010, 1, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bracamonte, J.C. Protocolo de muestreo para la estimación de la diversidad de murciélagos con redes de niebla en estudios de ecología. Ecol. Austral. 2018, 28, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henry, M.; Kalko, E.K.V. Foraging strategy and breeding constraints of Rhinophylla pumilio (Phyllostomidae) in the Amazon lowlands. J. Mammal. 2007, 88, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelm, D.H.; Wiesner, K.R.; von Helversen, O. Effects of artificial roosts for frugivorous bats on seed dispersal in a Neotropical forest–pasture mosaic. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22, 733–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cortés-Delgado, N.; Sosa, V.J. Do bats roost and forage in shade coffee plantations? A perspective from the frugivorous bat Sturnira hondurensis. Biotropica 2014, 46, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Rienzo, J.A.; Casanoves, F.; Balzarini, M.G.; González, L.; Tablada, M.; Robledo, C.W. InfoStat versión 2016 [Software]; Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina, 2016. http://www.infostat.com.ar.
- Tirira, D.G. Guía de campo de los mamíferos del Ecuador, 1st ed.; Murciélago Blanco: Quito, Ecuador, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Villacís, J.; Chiriboga, C. Relaciones entre las variables socioeconómicas y la cobertura arbórea de fincas ganaderas del trópico húmedo. Rev. Cubana Cienc. For. 2016, 4, 149–163. [Google Scholar]
- Peñuelas, J.; Fernández-Martínez, M.; Ciais, P.; Jou, D.; Piao, S.; Obersteiner, M.; Vicca, S.; Janssens, I.A.; Sardans, J. The bioelements, the elementome, and the biogeochemical niche. Ecology 2019, 100, e02652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schade, J.D.; Kyle, M.; Hobbie, S.E.; Fagan, W.F.; Elser, J.J. Stoichiometric tracking of soil nutrients by a desert insect herbivore. Ecol. Lett. 2003, 6, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parachnowitsch, A.L.; Manson, J.S. The chemical ecology of plant-pollinator interactions: Recent advances and future directions. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2015, 8, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Filipiak, M.; Weiner, J. Plant-insect interactions: The role of ecological stoichiometry. Acta Agrobot. 2017, 70, 6–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nanda, V.; Sarkar, B.C.; Sharma, H.K.; Bawa, A.S. Physico-chemical properties and estimation of mineral content in honey produced from different plants in Northern India. Food Chem. 2003, 82, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wdowiak, A.; Podgórska, A.; Szal, B. Calcium in plants: An important element of cell physiology and structure, signaling, and stress responses. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2024, 46, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, T.; Li, J.; He, Y.; Shankar, A.; Saxena, A.; Tiwari, A.; Maturi, K.C.; Solanki, M.K.; Singh, V.; Eissa, M.A.; Ding, Z.; Xie, J.; Awasthi, M.K. Role of calcium nutrition in plant physiology: Advances in research and insights into acidic soil conditions – A comprehensive review. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 210, 108602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, X.Y.; He, D.D.; Bai, S.; Zeng, W.Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, M.; Wu, L.Q.; Chen, Z.C. Physiological and molecular advances in magnesium nutrition of plants. Plant Soil 2021, 468, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silvestro, R.; Deslauriers, A.; Prislan, P.; Rademacher, T.; Rezaie, N. From roots to leaves: Tree growth phenology in forest ecosystems. Curr. For. Rep. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Landuyt, D.; Verheyen, K.; De Frenne, P. Tree species mixing can amplify microclimate offsets in young forest plantations. J. Appl. Ecol. 2022, 59, 1428–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsonev, T.; Cebola Lidon, F.J. Zinc in plants—An overview. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2012, 24, 322–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wessels, I.; Fischer, H.J.; Rink, L. Dietary and physiological effects of zinc on the immune system. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2021, 41, 133–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- du Sert, N.P.; et al. Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2. 0. PLoS Biol. 2020, 18. [Google Scholar]

| Crop Type | Plot Dimension (m) | No. of Plots Per Farm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FFG+ | FSA++ | ||
| Cocoa plantations | 10 * 10 | 3 | 3 |
| Live fence of Erythrina spp. | 100 * 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Mixed plantations | 10 * 10 | 3 | 3 |
| Polyspecific live fence | 100 * 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Scattered trees in pastures | 10 * 10 | 3 | 3 |
| Index | Nutrient | PCC | p-value | Fixed variable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sbats | K | 0.67 | 0.0359 | Sn-hp |
| Ca | 0.94 | 0.0001 | ||
| Mg | 0.78 | 0.0079 | ||
| Zn | 0.76 | 0.0112 | ||
| H'bats | K | 0.45 | 0.1896 | H'n-hp |
| Ca | 0.80 | 0.0056 | ||
| Mg | 0.76 | 0.0100 | ||
| Zn | 0.54 | 0.1092 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
