1. Introduction
Oceans cover approximately 75% of the planet’s surface and contain about 97% of the water available on Earth. [
1]. This huge marine area not only plays a vital role in regulating the climate and the water cycle but also provides multiple ecosystem services that in some cases have not been fully taken advantage of and could contribute greatly to the circular economy and economic development of marine-coastal areas. In the Colombian context, the strategic importance of the ocean is particularly relevant, since almost 50% of the national territory corresponds to maritime area, covering about 892.118 km² [
2]. This vast extension highlights the country’s great potential for the sustainable use of marine and coastal resources.
At the global scale, marine biomass valorisation has become a strategic pillar of the blue bioeconomy, promoted by international frameworks such as the European Union’s Blue Growth Strategy [
3] and the OECD’s Ocean Economy Agenda [
4]. Coastal nations of Asia and Europe such as Norway, Portugal, Japan, and China have advanced in developing marine-based bioindustries, transforming macroalgae, seagrasses, and other coastal resources into biofuels, bioplastics, and biochemicals. These initiatives demonstrate that the sustainable use of marine resources can simultaneously drive innovation, reduce carbon emissions, and enhance coastal resilience. In Latin America and the Caribbean, countries such as Costa Rica, Brazil, and Barbados have begun to explore similar strategies within their national bioeconomy frameworks [
5,
6].
Bioeconomy materials such as biomass or natural resources such as water and wind have been used as solutions to various issues related to climate change and dependence on fossil fuels over the years. Today, these resources are mainly used to produce energy and value-added products [
7]. However, these transformations require time, support from different stakeholders and a continuous effort in research, development and innovation. In coastal areas, it is possible to find these resources available, and it is interesting to characterise and identify these raw materials. In Colombia, and in coastal areas such as the Caribbean, there is a latent problem in terms of access to energy for the population and the sustainable and appropriate use of available waste or biomass [
8]. Efforts are being made to identify the potential use of biomass, water and wind in this area to establish the best strategies for improving the quality of life of the population and ensuring economic, environmental and technological sustainability.
In literature, there are multiple studies available that address the characterisation and potential uses or transformations of these resources into value-added products and energy. In the case of marine biomass, studies focused on seagrasses and macroalgae predominate, and in the case of renewable energies, studies on the use of seawater and coastal winds predominate. For example, macroalgae in general have proven to be a rich source of bioactive compounds that can be used in pharmaceutical, cosmetic, or nutraceutical industries. There is also growing interest in the use of this raw material in the production of biofuels and biomaterials, which demonstrates the versatility of seagrasses and their high potential for sustainable use [
9]. Similarly, the importance of seagrasses in the aquatic ecosystem has been studied due to their capacity for efficient carbon capture [
10]. However, when these pastures become waste, studies have been reported that demonstrate the potential of this raw material in wastewater treatment and also as a source of biomaterials and bioenergy [
11]. On the other hand, both water and sea winds have been proposed as unconventional renewable energy sources, and as an encouraging and very favourable solution for coastal areas. Offshore wind energy has recently gained popularity because it is more powerful at sea than on land (Barooni et al., 2022). According to statistical data from the International Energy Agency (IEA), wind energy accounts for 36% of the total market growth of renewable energies (Kim et al., 2022). In the case of seawater, the main reported use has been the production of drinking water through desalination processes (using various clean technologies, such as solar energy) [
12]. Furthermore, in the case of sea salt, its potential use in the production of sodium-ion batteries has been studied [
1]. This huge marine area not only plays a vital role in regulating the climate omising alternative to lithium for energy storage, including hydrogen storage [
13].
The purpose of this document is to focus on the study and characterisation of potential coastal biomass in La Guajira, Colombia and its potential for obtaining several bio-products. A conceptual review was conducted of the resources available globally and in La Guajira, highlighting current uses and potential for sustainable use. Finally, a comparison of these potentials was made through the impact on all dimensions of sustainability: technical, economic, environmental, and social. This document aims to focus attention on biomass and resources in coastal areas such as La Guajira and to open up the perspective to the various possibilities for obtaining value-added products, especially energy carriers.
2. Methodology
This review adopts a structured and comprehensive approach to synthesise the current knowledge on the valorisation potential of marine–coastal biomass to produce high-value bioproducts and its energetic use, considering both global and local advancements, with a specific focus on the context of La Guajira, Colombia.
A combination of bibliometric and thematic content analysis methods was employed to identify, analyse, and interpret relevant peer-reviewed scientific literature. Articles, theses, and book chapters were considered, primarily in English, although a few were included in Spanish, prioritising studies published within the last decade. The bibliographic search followed the general guidelines of the PRISMA 2020 methodology, adapted to a narrative review approach. Search was conducted in the Scopus and Google Scholar databases, using different combinations of keywords and Boolean operators (AND, OR) for each section of the present study.
The records obtained were organised in a Microsoft Excel matrix to perform the initial screening, reviewing titles, abstracts, biomass type, study objective, study design, bioproducts produced, results, and conclusions. Subsequently, specific sections or, in some cases, the full text of the selected articles were examined to confirm their relevance. In total, 74 documents were included in the final synthesis. The initial search identified 74 records across all topics, of which 22 were related to seagrass biomass (9 included), 20 to Sargassum (10 included), 15 to cactus species (13 included), 13 to seawater energy potential (11 included), and 4 to coastal wind and solar radiation energy potential. The overall process of literature identification, screening, and inclusion is summarised in
Figure 1.
The most relevant information was extracted and analysed qualitatively, focusing on the type of marine–coastal biomass and its potential for bioproduct and bioenergy generation. Additionally, the energy potential of seawater salinity and coastal wind was broadly examined. A comparative analysis was also conducted among the three types of biomasses studied (cactus, sargassum, and seagrass), considering their potential within the framework of coastal and offshore renewable energy systems.
To support this comparative assessment, a Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) was implemented using the software DEFINITE 3.1. The MCA served as a complementary decision-support tool to integrate the quantitative and qualitative findings and to evaluate the sustainability of each biomass alternative under environmental, technical, economic, and social dimensions.
The input data for the MCA were derived from the quantitative energy potential estimations and the qualitative evaluation of sustainability parameters described throughout the study. Seven criteria were established to represent key aspects of biomass valorisation: energy potential, Technological Readiness Level (TRL), economic feasibility, environmental sustainability, social benefit and local integration, availability and logistic viability, and circular bioeconomy potential.
Quantitative variables were introduced as ratio data (e.g., GWh·year⁻¹), while qualitative criteria were normalised on ordinal scales (1–5) to ensure comparability. The normalisation was performed using the maximum method, and aggregation followed the Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) technique, which allows assigning relative importance values to each criterion based on literature support and expert judgement. This approach ensures transparency and consistency with the sustainability framework adopted for evaluating marine–coastal biomass in La Guajira
3. Global Overview
3.1. Raw Materials
3.1.1. Seagrases
Seagrass beds are distributed along the narrow coastal strips of almost every continent except Antarctica. These ecosystems play a key role in mitigating climate change due to their high capacity for CO
2 sequestration and storage [
14], Although they represent only 2% of global vegetation cover, their carbon sequestration efficiency is superior, as they are capable of capturing up to ten times more carbon than terrestrial biological ecosystems, making them one of the most important carbon sinks in the world’s coastal areas. It is estimated that they contribute between 10 and 18% of the total carbon captured globally. This efficiency in carbon capture stems from their ability to produce large amounts of plant biomass, which stores anoxic sediments. Therefore, the larger the area and the longer the seagrass beds, the greater the carbon sequestration [
10].
Coastal biomass is carried by ocean currents to the shores, where it accumulates in large quantities. It usually serves as food for various species, while another portion tends to decompose or even be burned [
15]. For this reason, several coastal regions around the world have found ways to utilise marine biomass, specifically seagrass, in various sectors such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, food, bioenergy, construction materials and water treatment [
11]. For example, in the Mediterranean Sea area, it is common to find building materials made from seagrass biomass used for thermal insulation, as well as plant substrate substitutes to promote rooting and growth of flora. In Norway, Scotland and the Baltic Sea region, sargassum biomass has been found to be valuable for: essential macro and microelements used in biofertilisers or soil amendments and for biosorbents applied to biosorption used for the removal of various aquatic, organic and inorganic pollutants. In the Baltic Sea area of the Netherlands and Sweden, seagrass biomass is valued to produce bio-based compost applied to fertilisers for crop substrates and energy production. In Limassol, Cyprus, seagrass biomass is transformed into adsorbent materials for use in phosphate removal in wastewater treatment [
11]. In India, Arya et al. evaluated seagrasses of the species
Halodule uninervis,
Thalassia hemprichii,
Enhalus acoroides,
Cymodocea serrulata, and
Syringodium isoetifolium [
16] for the extraction of proteins and peptides, where the filtrate is used to manufacture various products, such as peptide-based products for the pharmaceutical industry. In Spain, seagrass leaves were used to make bricks, replacing sawdust with fibres from the leaves of the Mediterranean Sea endemic species Posidonia Oceanica [
17].
3.1.2. Algae and Sargassum
Among the biomass belonging to third-generation sources are algae, which reproduce rapidly and have a simple structure compared to second- and first-generation biomass [
18]. The use of this type of biomass provides a viable opportunity for obtaining high value-added products, especially biofuels. To access useful platforms for the transformation of this type of biomass, there are currently multiple technologies for different transformation routes, and much research is aimed at proposing various processes such as biorefineries [
19,
20,
21]. These systems are useful and applicable at different scales, and fractions of this biomass such as cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, proteins, among other compounds, can be valorised [
22].
Table 1 shows the cases in which proposals for transformation processes by third-generation biorefineries have been designed, and the trending products to be obtained.
However, one of the most important and studied seaweeds around the world is
Sargassum, which is present in all ocean basins, with more than 350 species. Specifically, in the Atlantic Ocean, there are several species, among which
Sargassum fluitans and
Sargassum natans stand out, forming what is called the Great Atlantic Sargassum Belt (GASB) [
26]. Sargassum is mainly found in tropical and subtropical marine environments and grows on reefs. Sargassum is one of the main types of ‘brown’ algae and is characterised by being an excellent biosorbent of multiple metal ions [
27].
Most species of sargassum, after their reproductive life cycle, detach from the seabed and form floating algae mats. Some other species directly reproduce as floating biomass in the sea [
28]. In the long term, these phenomena cause problems on the coast, as the current accumulates them on the shores of beaches. This generates multiple environmental, social and even economic problems [
29]. In social and economic terms, the accumulation of sargassum on the coast affects tourism and the work of fishing boats, which are the economic livelihood of the inhabitants of the area. Furthermore, in environmental terms, the negative impact lies in the accumulation of this seaweed on the coast and its limited use as a raw material for obtaining new bioproducts. In 2019, more than 1 million metric tonnes of sargassum accumulated on Caribbean beaches (especially in tourist areas), which clearly demonstrates the problems this can cause on the coast [
30].
As a result, research has demonstrated the high potential of using sargassum to obtain various bioproducts (see
Figure 2). These range from biomaterials such as biosorbents, plastics, construction materials and cellulose fibres for paper, energy products such as synthesis gas, biochar and biofuels such as ethanol, to compounds such as sugars, phenols, flavonoids, polysaccharides, animal feed and fertilisers.
This biomass tends to accumulate, and this phenomenon can be beneficial at moderate densities, as it provides food and shelter for various marine species and strengthens beaches by preventing erosion, as well as providing nutrients to coastal habitats [
31]. However, when this accumulation is very high, it can have negative effects on two levels: accumulation on the surface and accumulation on beaches. In the case of surface accumulation, the accumulation of sargassum can prevent light penetration, affecting corals and marine life in general. In the case of accumulation on beaches, sargassum can become a problem for animal life such as turtles that reach the shores, and a problem as waste, being a source of bad odours and the spread of disease, among other effects [
31].
Figure 3 illustrates the dynamics of the ecosystem where algae live and interact, which can be disrupted in the event of excessive accumulation.
3.1.3. Cacti
Cacti are xerophytic plants belonging to the
Cactaceae family, widely distributed in arid and dry ecosystems worldwide. They are distinguished by their ability to store water in their leaves, stems and roots for long periods, allowing them to survive under extreme climatic conditions [
33]. Among them, the
Agave and
Opuntia species stand out for their high water use efficiency and remarkable resistance to water scarcity, thanks to their photosynthetic system of Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM). This mechanism allows them to open their stomata at night to fix CO
2, taking advantage of hours of lower water loss through evaporation. In contrast, during the day they keep their stomata closed, thus reducing transpiration and limiting the net entry of CO
2 [
34]. In addition, cacti are part of second-generation biomass, as they are non-food lignocellulosic plants, making them a sustainable alternative for obtaining bioenergy and other bioproducts.
A wide variety of cactus species are distributed around the world, which has favoured their availability for use in the production of various bioproducts (see
Table 2). In different regions of Italy, the biomass of species such as
Opuntia ficus-indica, particularly the
Sanguigna and
Surfarina varieties, has been used to obtain various high-value products. These include seed oils, rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids such as linoleic and oleic acids, as well as γ-tocopherol and carotenoids, with great nutritional potential [
35]. Processes have also been developed to obtain pectins for the food and cosmetics industries, bioactive extracts (antioxidants and pigments), biogas through anaerobic digestion, and functional juices enriched with betalains [
36]. On the other hand, the mucilage extracted from
Opuntia ficus-indica has been used as a consolidating agent in paper manufacturing, as well as in restoration treatments for ancient documents and works on paper. This material is considered a reversible, economical, non-toxic and biodegradable alternative, highly effective for fixing and preserving colour in historical media [
37]. In Africa, more specifically in Tunisia, the biomass of fibrous layers of the
Opuntia ficus-indica species, which has very good mechanical resistance and thermal stability, has been used to produce biocomposites, packaging materials, paper and other applications of natural fibres [
38]. Meanwhile, in Mexico, it has been demonstrated that the cultivation of species such as Opuntia and Agave helps to mitigate soil erosion and combat desertification. These species are also highly valued in the production of food, fodder and spirits such as tequila and mezcal in crops. According to Honorato-Salazar et al., it is possible to valorise the biomass of these species as mucilage, cladodes, fibres and bagasse in the production of biogas, bio-SNG, biodiesel and fructans such as insulin, which represents a great alternative for reducing dependence on fossil fuels in Mexico [
34]. It should be noted that throughout Mexico, there is a high rate of semi-arid and arid areas, which favours the organic and sustainable cultivation of cacti of these species, without compromising local biodiversity and promoting soil health. In fact, some Mexican biorefineries use biomass from the
Opuntia Ficus species grown in experimental gardens at the National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Research to produce 99.7% anhydrous bioethanol through enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation [
39]. In Ecuador, bioplastics have been produced from the extraction and gelation of the mucilage of
Opuntia ficus-indica, and it has been discovered that the greater the drought to which the cacti are subjected, the greater the amount of mucilage they can contain, and therefore the greater the amount of bioplastics that can be produced [
40].
On the other hand, cacti of the genus
Stenocereus (Berger) Riccob are distributed throughout the American continent, from the arid areas of southern Arizona to northern Colombia and Venezuela. Among its most common species are plants known as pitayas, whose fruits are used for human consumption. In countries such as Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela, they are used in food products such as jams, jellies, and pickles [
41].
3.1.4. Saltwater Energy Potential
Marine water resources are key to regulating the global climate, the carbon cycle and cloud formation, and constitute one of the largest sources of renewable energy globally. There is great energy potential in the use of marine water resources. There are currently five types of water-to-energy conversion: tidal energy derived from the periodic movement of the tides, wave energy that harnesses the kinetic and potential energy of surface waves, ocean current energy, ocean thermal energy based on the temperature gradient between surface and deep waters, and salinity gradient energy, also known as osmotic energy [
42]. These mechanisms have been the subject of growing interest due to their high energy potential, particularly in coastal regions and archipelagos where the availability of other renewable sources is limited. Research has shown that osmotic energy is released when solutions of different salinity, such as seawater and freshwater, are mixed. In areas where there are hypersaline basins on the ocean floor, the controlled mixing of these waters can release energy continuously, representing a renewable and stable source, albeit with moderate energy density. The magnitude of this potential depends on the size of the basins and the difference in salinity, but it is estimated that it could be comparable to or even greater than other marine technologies such as ocean thermal energy conversion [
43]. On the ocean thermal energy side, the temperature difference between surface and deep waters can be exploited to generate electricity thanks to the oceans’ ability to store most of the heat from the Earth’s climate system [
44].
Saltwater is also a strategic resource in terms of access to drinking water for coastal communities. In this context, desalination has established itself as a key alternative for ensuring water supply in areas with water stress and easy access to the coast. Technologies such as reverse osmosis, multi-stage distillation and electrodialysis have evolved towards more sustainable schemes, integrating renewable sources such as solar, wind and, more recently, tidal and wave energy, to reduce the high energy consumption of these processes.
3.2. Technologies Applied for Each Raw Material
The use of the identified raw material (seagrass, sargassum algae, cactus, and saline resources from seawater) involves the adoption of different technological routes, each with varying degrees of development and maturity. To assess their viability for bioeconomy and sustainable energy initiatives, the TRL was established for each one, based on a review of documentation and updated technical references.
Table 3 summarises the main findings prior to the detailed discussion.
Seagrasses, such as
Posidonia oceanica, represent an abundant biomass in temperate and tropical coastal areas, with potential for recovery in circular economy schemes. The main technological routes identified focus on four areas: composting, pollutant adsorption, construction materials and extraction of bioactive compounds. Composting and biofertiliser formulation are among the most mature applications, with evidence from community and pilot projects in the Baltic and Mediterranean basins demonstrating their agronomic effectiveness and odour control, reaching a TRL of 6–7. In contrast, the use of this biomass as a natural adsorbent for the removal of metals or phosphates in wastewater has shown excellent results in the laboratory and some pilot field tests, reaching intermediate levels (TRL 5–7). The incorporation of
Posidonia fibres into lightweight panels and bricks for sustainable construction is at an advanced experimental stage (TRL 5–6), while the extraction of proteins and peptides for cosmetic or pharmaceutical purposes remains at the laboratory scale (TRL 4–5). In general, the routes associated with composting and adsorption are the most mature and have the lowest technological risk, although industrial applications of composite materials could offer greater added value in the medium term. The main limitations to scaling up include collection logistics, compositional variability of the material, the presence of salts, and the lack of specific regulations for its industrial recovery [
17,
43,
45].
On the other hand, HTL is currently the most advanced technology for energy recovery from algae, with TRL levels between 7 and 8, thanks to recent industrial developments in continuous reactors and demonstration plants (e.g., PNNL and VITO EnergyVille). Anaerobic digestion, applied to both fresh sargassum and mixtures with agricultural waste, is also highly mature (TRL 6–7) and constitutes a well-established route for biogas production. Pyrolysis aimed at obtaining biochar or bio-oil is in the pilot stages (TRL 5–7), while fractionation for high-value bioproducts—such as pigments, antioxidants, or cosmetic compounds—remains in the research phase (TRL 4–6). Overall, thermochemical routes exhibit a higher degree of maturity, although there are technical challenges associated with high salt content, biomass variability, and drying and transport costs. Recent initiatives for integrated biorefineries for sargassum in the Caribbean demonstrate the growing interest in its sustainable use, combining the removal of coastal waste with the generation of economic value [
20,
21,
22].
In the case of cactus, enzymatic fermentation for bioethanol is in a consolidated pilot phase (TRL 6–7), with reports of experimental plants in Mexico achieving yields and purities comparable to first-generation biofuels. Similarly, the anaerobic digestion of cactus and its agro-industrial residues have been validated at the pilot scale (TRL 6–7), standing out for its high efficiency in regions with water constraints. Mucilage extraction and bioplastic or biodegradable film formulation lines are still experimental (TRL 4–6), although they are evolving rapidly, driven by demand for alternatives to petroleum-based plastics. Finally, the recovery of oils, pectins and pigments represents an additional opportunity for product diversification within small-scale biorefineries. The main technological challenge lies in standardising the raw material, optimising enzymatic pretreatments and defining viable business models for rural or semi-arid regions [
38,
39,
40].
Among ocean resources, such as sea salt, reverse osmosis is the only fully commercial technology, with a TRL of 9 and widespread implementation worldwide. Tidal energy, based on current turbines and wave converters, has devices in commercial operation or advanced demonstration (TRL 7–9), especially in countries with high tidal resources. Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC), which exploits the thermal gradient between surface and deep waters, is in the technical demonstration phase (TRL 5–7), with pilot projects in the Caribbean and the Pacific. Finally, osmotic energy combines the difference in salinity between fresh and salt water to generate electricity; although its technical viability has been proven in a pilot plant, the high costs of membranes and their durability limit its scaling up (TRL 5–6). The integration of these technologies into hybrid systems—for example, OTEC+desalination or osmotic energy+reverse osmosis desalination—represents an interesting opportunity for coastal regions [
43,
44].
4. Case of Study: La Guajira, Colombia
4.1. Seagrasses Locally
In Colombia, more than 80% of seagrass beds are found in the continental Caribbean, mainly in the department of La Guajira, and in the western island region, on the island of San Andrés, which has been part of the Seaflower Biosphere Reserve since 2000 and the Marine Protected Area (MPA) since 2005 [
10]. Both regions are home to ecosystems that are fundamental to the conservation of marine biodiversity and its ecological functions. In the insular zone, there is a basin with a high presence of corals, sea urchins, calcareous macroalgae and seagrasses covering an area of approximately 399 ha, as shown in
Figure 4. The coral area is larger than the territorial area of the islands.
La Guajira has approximately 56.386 hectares of seagrass composed of species such as
Thalassia testudinum and
Syringofium filiforme, also known as “manatee grass”, distributed between 0 and 15 metres deep [
10,
46]. Based on a georeferencing analysis performed using
QGIS software, it was determined that the total seagrass coverage in the country is approximately 64.736 hectares.
Table 4 shows the distribution by department.
Of these departments, the area of interest for study is the department of La Guajira. To understand its geographical location, the map in
Figure 5 was developed, which explicitly indicates the location of seagrass beds (represented in brown on the map) and potential areas where seagrass beds are likely to exist but have not yet been characterised. In addition, some seagrasses are found in coral areas, which should be conserved and protected due to their importance in marine and ecosystem biodiversity conservation. The seagrasses are located on the coasts of the municipalities of Riohacha, Manaure, and Uribia.
Potential areas with seagrass presence have also been identified, which are shown in light red on the map in
Figure 5. The area corresponding to these zones in Colombia is detailed in
Table 5, which shows the total extent of each one.
La Guajira has the largest amount of seagrass and potential seagrass meadows in Colombia, most of which are located near the central west coast of the department. This offers great potential for traditional communities to take advantage of seagrass biomass to produce bioproducts, thereby boosting their economy and trade.
The seagrasses of the Colombian Caribbean are key ecosystems in terms of biodiversity, not only because of their carbon capture capacity, which in areas such as the Seaflower Biosphere Reserve and the Marine Protected Area makes them carbon sinks [
10], but also because of their other ecosystem services such as coastal protection, support for marine and terrestrial food webs, shelter and food for different marine species, and are perfect areas for the reproduction of different species of molluscs, fish and crustaceans. They have high potential for connecting breeding habitats and coral reefs; in short, they are the lifeblood of marine biodiversity [
18,
47,
48]. In addition, they are bioindicators of marine quality, as species such as
Thalassia testudinum, which is identified as the most abundant in the region, are capable of absorbing and accumulating essential, heavy and highly toxic metals and trace elements in their tissues rich in functional groups such as hydroxyls, sulfates, and carboxyl in the cell walls of polysaccharides, which favour the retention of these compounds. The efficiency of elimination and accumulation of elements by
Thalassia testudinum is presented in
Table 6, which details the wide variety of chemical elements that this species can absorb, expressed in micrograms of the element per kilogram of dry tissue; these concentrations were determined by the study of Palacio-Herrera et al. using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis [
18].
Table 6.
Range of trace element concentrations that may be present in 1 kg of dried seaweed.
Table 6.
Range of trace element concentrations that may be present in 1 kg of dried seaweed.
| Type of trace element |
Element |
Concentration rate (µg/kg) |
| Toxic |
Thallium |
TI |
25,9 – 323 |
| Bismuth |
Bi |
30,3 – 671 |
| Antimony |
Sb |
57,1 – 671 |
| Cadmium |
Cd |
74,4 – 972 |
| Arsenic |
As |
159 – 5.655 |
| Lead |
Pb |
1.982 – 20.396 |
| Excessively toxic |
Selenium |
Se |
3,4 – 1.319 |
| Beryllium |
Be |
10 – 718 |
| Cobalt |
Co |
10,0 – 5.652 |
| Lithium |
Li |
66,3 – 15.381 |
| Nickel |
Ni |
1.119 – 16.562 |
| Vanadium |
V |
1.379 – 60.711 |
| Cooper |
Cu |
1.870 – 198.492 |
| Chromium |
Cr |
2.897 – 32.732 |
| Lanthanides |
Thulium |
Tm |
1,9 – 162 |
| Terbium |
Tb |
2,1 – 356 |
| Lutetium |
Lu |
2,3 – 154 |
| Europium |
Eu |
3,9 – 600 |
| Holmium |
Ho |
3,2 – 383 |
| Samarium |
Sm |
7,9 – 2.316 |
| Dysprosium |
Dy |
11,9 – 1.946 |
| Erbium |
Er |
12,1 – 1.127 |
| Gadolinium |
Gd |
12,5 – 2.919 |
| Ytterbium |
Yb |
10,2 – 1.049 |
| Praseodymium |
Pr |
10,9 – 2.995 |
| Neodymium |
Nd |
50,3 – 11.866 |
| Cerium |
Ce |
51,5 – 25.565 |
| Lanthanum |
La |
43,3 – 12.881 |
| Actinides |
Thorium |
Th |
7,4 – 5.465 |
| |
Uranium |
U |
419 – 10.825 |
| Micronutrients |
Molybdenum |
Mo |
10 – 27.726 |
| |
Boron |
B |
1.051 – 48.4596 |
| |
Zinc |
Zn |
29.686 – 18.2425 |
| Other elements |
Tantalum |
Ta |
4 – 1.705 |
| Tungsten |
W |
3,3 – 753 |
| Cesium |
Cs |
3,8 – 1.199 |
| Hafnium |
Hf |
6,4 – 909 |
| Niobium |
Nb |
5,1 – 6.792 |
| Tin |
Sn |
28,8 – 3.319 |
| Gallium |
Ga |
22,1 – 6.790 |
| Barium |
Ba |
18,8 – 6.512 |
| Germanium |
Ge |
71,7 – 2.480 |
| Scandium |
Sc |
71,2 – 6.901 |
| Yttrium |
Y |
152 – 10.185 |
| Zirconium |
Zr |
380 – 29.373 |
| Rubidium |
Rb |
719 – 26.020 |
| Strontium |
Sr |
220.401 – 3.380.869 |
Quantitatively, the mapped seagrass area in La Guajira covers approximately 56.386,41 hectares. The dry biomass density of these meadows ranges from 200 to 1.000 g/m² (0,2–1 kg/m²), although values may vary depending on species composition, seasonality, and local environmental conditions [
49]. Regarding energy potential, the Lower Heating Value (LHV) of aquatic biomass typically ranges between 15 and 20 MJ/kg of dry weight. Pyrolysis studies of marine macroalgae have reported higher heating values for solid products (19–25 MJ/kg), whereas the original biomass exhibits lower energy yields due to its high ash and moisture content [
50].
The total standing biomass (M) was calculated by multiplying the total area (A) by the dry biomass density (ρ), while the theoretical energy potential (E) was estimated as:
The results for minimum, average and maximum scenarios are presented in
Table 7.
Results indicate that the total dry biomass in La Guajira ranges between approximately 112.773 and 563.864 tonnes, corresponding to a theoretical energy potential of 470–3.132 GWh.
These figures represent the order of magnitude of energy stored in seagrass biomass; however, their direct exploitation would have significant ecological implications. Therefore, these values should be interpreted solely as theoretical reference estimates within the broader context of blue bioeconomy potential. However, the seagrasses under consideration are in seagrass beds, ecosystems that are strategic for absorbing carbon and thus mitigate the accelerated acidification of the oceans.
4.2. Sargassum Locally
In the Colombian Caribbean, minor sargassum strandings have been reported on islands such as San Andrés and Providencia, and in areas of La Boquilla (Cartagena) and Tayrona Park (Magdalena). Studies by the Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras - INVEMAR have recorded sporadic occurrences in the Colombian Caribbean Sea, especially between July and October, when Caribbean currents transport sargassum aggregates from the east [
51,
52]. In the coastal area of La Guajira, particularly Cabo de la Vela, Manaure and Puerto Bolívar, sargassum is not abundant, mainly due to:
Caribbean ocean currents flowing westward, but the main flow of the sargassum belt passes further north, skirting the Greater Antilles.
High wave energy and trade winds that hinder the accumulation of floating biomass.
Slightly higher temperature and salinity and arid areas with little nutrient runoff (unlike areas further south in the Caribbean).
However, fishermen and coastal communities have reported small seasonal accumulations of floating macroalgae (not always
Sargassum natans or
Sargassum fluitans, but also
Dictyota,
Gracilaria, or even detached seagrass debris). These local macroalgae could have a similar biochemical composition for energy uses (high polysaccharide content, low lignin). In La Guajira, macroalgae ecosystems have been observed where sargassum growth can be found.
Figure 6 shows the areas of La Guajira where these ecosystems are located.
The Caribbean Sea can receive millions of tonnes of floating Sargassum each year, although its spatial and temporal distribution is highly variable, depending on ocean currents, wind patterns, and regional climatic conditions. To date, there are no continuous and up-to-date quantitative records of the exact amount of Sargassum reaching the coasts of La Guajira (Colombia). However, it is estimated that the total biomass of macroalgae reaching the coasts of La Guajira —including Sargassum spp. and other macroalgae— is approximately 1.1 t/km², covering the coastal stretch from Riohacha to Punta Gallinas across an estimated 4.220 km², corresponding to about 4.640 tonnes of fresh biomass per year [
51,
52].
Complementarily, the Sargassum Watch System (SaWS) from the University of South Florida has reported, through monthly satellite observations, a significant increase in floating Sargassum biomass in the tropical Atlantic and the western Caribbean, particularly during the past decade. In 2025, critical accumulations were recorded, with a total of 37–38 million tonnes of floating Sargassum detected across the tropical Atlantic, of which around 10% was concentrated in the western Caribbean. Considering the proportion of coastline corresponding to Colombia (approximately 6%) and the fraction that effectively beaches (10–30%), it is estimated that between 23.000 and 68.000 tonnes of fresh Sargassum may reach the Colombian Caribbean annually, with recurrent and significant landings reported in San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina islands, and to a lesser extent along La Guajira, particularly during the months of April, May, and July.
For the quantitative analysis, the SaWS (2025) satellite-based projection was considered. It was assumed that Sargassum biomass contains 80% moisture (20% dry matter) and has a LHV ranging from 10 to 12 MJ/kg [
50].
Thus, the theoretical energy potential was calculated as:
where represents the estimated dry biomass.
Usable energy was obtained by applying an average efficiency of 30% to account for losses in the conversion process of useful energy. The results are presented in
Table 8.
The results indicate that the theoretical energy potential of sargassum biomass reaching the Colombian Caribbean and particularly La Guajira ranges from approximately 12,8 to 45,3 GWh per year, depending on the annual biomass influx.
4.3. Cacti Locally
In Colombia, the greatest diversity of
cactaceae is mainly concentrated in the dry inter-Andean valleys and in arid and semi-arid regions, with notable records in the departments of La Guajira, Magdalena, Huila (in the Tatacoa Desert), among others (see
Figure 7). By 2013, 42 species had been found in the country [
53], and in the Caribbean region, there are 12 genera and 26 species and subspecies [
54].
Table 9 presents some of the most common cactus species found in the Colombian Caribbean, along with their scientific names, subspecies, and common names.
The diversity of cacti in the country is closely related to the environmental conditions of tropical dry forests, which favour the presence of species adapted to aridity and nutrient-poor soils [
55], as well as being ecosystems with endemic importance and floristic turnover. In Wayúu culture, Yosú, also known by its scientific name
Stenocereus griseus, is valued as an important plant. This species of cactus is distributed in Colombia in departments such as La Guajira, Cesar and Magdalena, as well as in areas such as the Tatacoa Desert, the Chicamocha Canyon, the upper Magdalena River valley and Cúcuta. The Wayúu use the forest biomass of these cacti, derived from the plant’s xylem or ‘Yotojoro,’ as raw material for building homes. They also use this plant as food for both their ranches and their animals [
41].
In Colombia, one of the ancestral uses of cacti has been to purify water. This has attracted the attention of researchers, who have found that cacti can serve as coagulants in the water purification process [
56]. It has also been shown that the mucilage of different cactus species is rich in polysaccharides and minerals such as Ca (calcium), Mg (magnesium), Na (sodium), C (carbon), H (hydrogen), O (oxygen), N (nitrogen), and S (sulphur), as well as sugars such as arabinose, galactose, rhamnose, and xylose, which increases their potential for use in the manufacture of bioproducts [
56].
In Colombia, various studies have shown that it is possible to produce biogas for electricity generation from the
Opuntia ficus-indica cactus, using its biomass in anaerobic digestion processes. The use of this species is particularly attractive, as its costs are lower than other types of biomasses due to its high resistance to extreme temperatures, its tolerance to drought and its rapid growth [
57].
In the Colombian department of La Guajira, arid and semi-arid ecosystems predominate, where cacti are among the most dominant species, especially in the northern (Alta Guajira) region. According to Corpoguajira (2021), xerophytic species occupy approximately 7–10% of the departmental territory, corresponding to 160.000–230.000 ha, of which cacti represent on average 15–30% of the total above-ground biomass. The biomass density of cacti varies widely across the department, ranging between 2 and 10 t/ha, depending on soil type, rainfall, and altitude [
57]; the LHV of cactus biomass ranges from 14 to 18 MJ/kg.
Considering environmental sustainability, only 10–15% of the total standing biomass can be feasibly harvested each year without compromising the regeneration of vegetation and soil stability.
The theoretical energy potential was calculated as:
where
represents the estimated harvestable (sustainable) biomass. Usable energy was obtained by applying an average conversion efficiency of 30%, accounting for transformation losses. The results are summarised in
Table 10.
The results indicate that the standing biomass of cacti in La Guajira may range from 0,32 to 1,6 million tonnes of dry matter, depending on local density and coverage. Assuming a 10% sustainable extraction rate, the usable biomass varies between 32.000 and 160.000 tonnes per year, which corresponds to a theoretical energy potential between 124 and 800 GWh per year. Although cacti represent a reliable renewable biomass source, their exploitation must be limited by ecological constraints, given their essential role in soil protection, erosion control, and biodiversity conservation in arid zones. Therefore, only a small fraction of the total stock should be considered for energy or bioproduct applications, prioritising circular and low-impact uses such as biogas, biocarbon, and sustainable materials.
4.4. Saltwater: Energy Potential and Access to Water Resources for Communities
Colombia has a vast marine territory that represents approximately 50% of its total area, with nearly 2,070,408 km² of territorial waters distributed between the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean [
58]; Ten Colombian departments have direct access to the sea: in the Caribbean, Atlántico, Bolívar, Sucre, Córdoba, Magdalena, La Guajira, and San Andrés y Providencia; in the Pacific, Chocó, Valle del Cauca, Cauca, and Nariño. The Caribbean coast is characterised by warmer waters, lower rainfall and higher population density and tourism development, while the Pacific is known for its high biodiversity, higher rainfall and a predominantly Afro-descendant and indigenous population, with lower economic development and greater isolation. Access to these marine resources provides key benefits such as food, oxygen, medicine, protection against coastal erosion and recreational opportunities, as well as being fundamental to biodiversity conservation and the country’s sustainable development [
58].
In terms of energy potential, Colombia’s resources are concentrated in La Guajira, where high solar radiation favours the integration of photovoltaic systems with desalination plants. Research has shown that hybrid energy schemes can significantly reduce energy consumption and improve sustainability, guaranteeing access to drinking water in isolated communities [
12]. The optimal sizing of desalination plants powered by renewable energy depends on high-resolution climate information. In this regard, the use of models such as ERA5-Land has made it possible to configure systems with more than 98% renewable energy input, strengthening the territory’s water and energy security [
59]. This can symbolise technical and economic opportunities for indigenous communities, where cosmology is integrated and energy and water access models in the region are intensified, which is essential for promoting quality of life and the fulfilment of sustainable development goals such as 6 access to clean water and sanitation and 7 affordable and non-polluting energy in the coastal and rural communities of La Guajira, Colombia, which currently face great pressures regarding access to drinking water and energy [
12].
It is important to note that, in addition to access to drinking water and energy generation through reverse osmosis processes, it is possible to further enhance the value of marine resources (see
Figure 8). When reverse osmosis is integrated with renewable energies such as offshore wind or solar panels, not only is the production of desalinated water facilitated, but the opportunity to obtain green hydrogen from the electrolysis of treated water is also opened up, contributing to the sustainable energy transition [
60]. The process also generates concentrated brine, which can be used to produce compounds such as sodium hydroxide and to recover valuable salts and minerals [
61]. In addition, reverse osmosis and associated hybrid technologies enable the recovery and concentration of essential nutrients present in seawater, such as nitrates, phosphates, silicates and iron, which are fundamental to agriculture, aquaculture and the chemical industry [
62].
4.5. Coastal Winds and Solar Radiation
Air and sunlight are resources available across the entire surface of the Earth. However, there are specific areas of the planet where these resources are much more abundant and have specific properties or behaviours that have shown it is possible to harness them to obtain energy. Solar energy basically refers to harnessing the sun’s radiation to generate electricity (photovoltaic) or heat (solar thermal). In a photovoltaic system, panels convert photons into electrical current using semiconductor materials (e.g. silicon). Efficiency depends on irradiation, angle, temperature, and losses (shading, dirt). On the other hand, wind energy is based on capturing the kinetic energy of the wind with turbines that convert that energy into electricity.
The geographical and climatic conditions in La Guajira have contributed to the region being identified as one of the areas with the highest solar radiation potential in the country. Research based on IDEAM meteorological records and atmospheric transmissibility models has reported average total radiation values of around 6.3 kWh/m²-day, which makes the implementation of photovoltaic and thermal technologies viable [
63]. Other analyses of historical series between 1993 and 2013 confirm the high availability of direct, diffuse and global radiation in the region, highlighting La Guajira’s climatic advantage over other departments in the Colombian Caribbean [
64]. Similarly, recent geospatial assessments reinforce that La Guajira has one of the highest values of global solar radiation in the entire Caribbean region, making it a strategic location for renewable energy projects [
65,
66].
5. Comparative Discussion of the Impact on Energy Carrier Products in La Guajira
To compare the energy potential and sustainability of the coastal marine biomass analysed (seagrass, sargassum and cactus), a multi-criteria analysis was applied using DEFINITE 3.1 software (demo). Seven criteria were defined, integrating technical, environmental, economic and social dimensions, selected based on the bibliographic analysis and the quantitative results presented in this section. The criteria are detailed in
Table 11, where you can see the values assigned to each criterion by type of biomass. In addition, two options were added, one with the minimum ranges considered and the other with the maximum ranges considered.
The criterion of “energy potential” was included with the aim of quantitatively comparing the capacity of each biomass to contribute to renewable energy production. It should be noted that for sea ducks, the energy potential was initially calculated considering the area of seagrass beds, as there is no quantified data on how much seagrass biomass arrived on the Guajira coast in a year. The TRL criterion reflects the state of development and applicability of the technologies associated with each biomass, representing the feasibility of implementing future utilisation processes in the region. Economic feasibility was considered based on how easy it is for the region’s inhabitants to collect in terms of cost. This criterion was evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = lowest feasibility, 2 = medium-low feasibility, 3 = medium feasibility, 4 = medium-high feasibility, and 5 = high feasibility. For seagrass, the value of medium feasibility was taken, since fishermen could easily obtain seagrass biomass not only from the amount that reaches the coast, but also in a controlled manner and, to a lesser extent, from some of the seagrass beds. For sargassum, the highest value was taken, since during periods when sargassum arrives, the population could not only collect sargassum from the coast, but fishermen or boatmen could also collect the resource from our Colombian maritime territory in the Caribbean Sea, where it has been shown that immense quantities of sargassum arrive. For cactus, the value of medium-high feasibility was taken, since the population not only has to collect it, but also reforest with more cactus or grow cactus crops. In addition, as they are distributed throughout the territory, they are easy to access, but it is necessary to take care of the species. Environmental sustainability assessed the degree of ecological impact and the need for conservation of the resource and was evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5, in the same way as economic feasibility. Seagrasses are the most vulnerable species and were given a medium-high value of 4, given their high ecological sensitivity and the need for protective measures. Sargassum was given a score of 3, as it is a highly available but seasonal resource; and cacti were given a value of 3, as they require extraction control to prevent deterioration of the arid ecosystem. The criterion of “social benefit and local integration” was also evaluated from 1 to 5. Seagrass was given a value of 3 due to the ecological restrictions associated with its use; sargassum and cacti achieved the maximum value of 5, as they offer sustainable production opportunities and are linked to local knowledge, coastal tourism and traditional practices. The criterion of “availability and logistical feasibility” was evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5, as in the previous cases. Seagrass was given a value of 2, as it is not widely available or accessible. Sargassum and cacti were given a value of 5, as they are highly feasible and accessible. The criterion of “circular bioeconomy potential” reflected the possibility of diversifying biomass-derived products beyond energy. Seagrass and sargassum were given a value of 5 for their proven ability to produce bioplastics, biofertilisers and cosmetics, and cacti were given a value of 4 for their proven potential in obtaining biogas, filters and biopolymers, although with less reported technological diversity.
The Energy potential variable was introduced as a ratio (GWh·year⁻¹) and calculated from the available dry biomass and its LHV, applying a 30% conversion efficiency to represent typical energy recovery losses. The TRL criterion (C2) was coded on the standard 1–9 scale, while the remaining qualitative criteria were established on an ordinal 1–5 scale (1 = very low, 5 = very high). The input values were derived directly from the quantitative results and sustainability assumptions previously described.
All benefit-type criteria were normalised using the maximum method, ensuring that the best-performing option for each criterion received a standardised value of 1. The aggregation of criteria was performed through the WLC approach, which allows the integration of heterogeneous quantitative and qualitative indicators under a unified decision-making framework.
The assignment of weights was carried out through a combination of expert judgement, literature review, and the sustainability priorities identified for the region of La Guajira. In line with the integrated bioeconomy framework adopted in this study, environmental and social dimensions were prioritised to reflect the ecological sensitivity of coastal ecosystems and the dependence of local livelihoods on sustainable resource management. Consequently, the following weighting scheme was applied:
Energy potential: 20% - representing the quantitative contribution of each biomass to renewable energy generation.
Technological readiness level (TRL): 10% - reflecting the current stage of technological maturity for biomass conversion processes.
Environmental sustainability: 20% - emphasising the ecological integrity and long-term resilience of each biomass resource.
Economic feasibility: 15% - accounting for cost-efficiency and ease of implementation for local communities.
Social benefit and local integration: 15% - highlighting the relevance of social inclusion, employment potential, and community well-being.
Availability and logistic viability: 10% - capturing accessibility, transport feasibility, and resource stability throughout the year.
Circular bioeconomy potential: 10% - integrating the capacity of each biomass to generate multiple value-added products beyond energy.
This weighting configuration aligns with sustainability-oriented decision-making approaches used in recent MCA studies on bioresource management [
67], ensuring a balanced representation of environmental, economic, and social perspectives.
The MCA results are presented in
Figure 9, which show the normalised performance radar by criterion and the contribution of each criterion to the final score. The multi-criteria analysis shows that, in terms of potential energy, seagrass has greater energy potential than cactus and sargassum (due to its high capacity to act as a carbon sink), although cactus ranks second in terms of potential. Technological maturity is almost the same for all three options, with seagrass slightly lower. In terms of economic feasibility, sargassum has the greatest potential as it is very easy to access, along with cactus. However, this would require the population to collect sargassum during the arrival season and not only limit themselves to the Guajira coast but also venture out to sea to collect surface sargassum from the Caribbean Sea. In terms of environmental sustainability, seagrass is the most vulnerable species and therefore the one that needs the most care, as it does not always wash up on the coast in large quantities and seagrass meadows are fundamental ecosystems for climate change mitigation. For this reason, it is the least sustainable in terms of environmental sustainability. Cacti and sargassum can be more easily controlled in terms of their ecosystem renewal and collection, which is why they are higher. In terms of social benefits and local integration, all three alternatives could be well accepted if the worldview of the cultures inhabiting the region is respected and integrated. In terms of logistics and access to resources, cactus and sargassum biomass are the most accessible and controllable. In terms of circular economic potential, all three alternatives fulfil this purpose. However, given the large quantities of sargassum that reach the coast and the Caribbean Sea, this has the greatest potential for circular economic use, together with the sargassum that arrives on the Guajira coast. The multi-criteria analysis shows that all three alternatives are good, but the most fragile and vulnerable is seagrass, which, although it is the biomass with the greatest energy potential if the entire area of the meadows is considered, is not as viable for total use. This is followed by cacti, which, as they are distributed throughout the territory and must be cultivated, may be somewhat vulnerable as a species. However, in terms of energy, they could be the best option, followed finally by sargassum, which, although it does not have great energy potential, is the most accessible and least vulnerable.
Throughout this review, it has been indirectly demonstrated that coastal resources represent enormous energy potential. Coastal areas such as La Guajira can be considered ‘natural energy laboratories,’ representing wealth in biomass and constant energy flow resources (wind, waves, and sun). In terms of biomass, sargassum, microalgae and fishing waste are raw materials that can be used to obtain energy carriers. In the case of seaweed, it has the advantage of not competing with agricultural land or fresh water, but the disadvantage of being costly to cultivate, harvest and dry, which is required to obtain value-added products. On the other hand, sargassum and other macroalgae represent an environmental problem due to their accumulation on beaches, which makes their use interesting. In the case of fishing and aquaculture waste, products such as oils and proteins available there can be key platforms for obtaining biodiesel, biogas, and other bioproducts. Coastal areas such as La Guajira are considered hotspots for photovoltaic and wind energy. Offshore wind power is booming in Europe, and in Colombia, the Caribbean has one of the greatest potentials in Latin America. This indicates the enormous potential of these resources to guarantee the permanent availability of clean energy. Finally, in terms of the saltwater available in the area, several interesting potentials can be identified: (i) the salt gradient, which integrates saltwater and freshwater to release energy, although this technology is still under development; (ii) the movement of the sea generates quite useful and available energy, despite its economic limitations; and (iii) coastal green hydrogen obtained from solar and wind electricity to electrolyse seawater, either desalinated or directly. The latter potential is currently one of the most recent.
The impact of the potential for each of the resources mentioned can be discussed in
Table 12. In economic terms, the most mature technologies are solar, wind, the use of organic waste through anaerobic digestion, and waste oil conversions. In turn, the routes and innovations with the most R&D are those involving the use of macroalgae for biofuels, the saline gradient, and direct seawater electrolysis. The latter require full-scale pilots to sustainably assess their impact and applicability. In economic terms, technologies such as offshore wind and large-scale green hydrogen require high initial investments. Although Colombia, and especially the La Guajira region, has favourable resources for the implementation of these technologies, there are still regulatory barriers that somewhat delay progress in the development of these innovations. However, technologies involving the use of sargassum as waste and fishing waste have lower CAPEX and cross-cutting benefits in other areas. In environmental and social terms, integrating solutions to the problem of sargassum accumulation can be environmentally beneficial if dumping is prevented and pollution is controlled. But to truly identify whether these solutions are truly positive, it is necessary to incorporate environmental impact assessments alongside prior consultation processes with coastal communities (which in the case of La Guajira are indigenous).
6. Policy and Research Implications
On the global stage, regulations on the use of coastal and marine resources have gradually advanced. There are international guidelines promoted by organisations such as the FAO and the European Union, which establish sustainability criteria for biofuel production and marine biomass management [
3]. These standards not only seek to prevent impacts on biodiversity, but also to promote the responsible and traceable use of ecosystems. However, their application varies according to local contexts, and they often leave gaps when it comes to new technological approaches, such as integrated biorefineries or the use of sargassum and macroalgae for energy. In the case of Colombia, we do not yet have a specific policy regulating the use of marine biomass for energy or biotechnological purposes. However, there are regulatory frameworks that overlap and are applicable at different stages of the process [
80]. For example, regulations on biofuels, aquaculture and environmental licences define conditions that all research must consider. This includes everything from scientific collection permits, established by the Ministry of the Environment, to procedures for accessing genetic resources or occupying maritime areas under DIMAR jurisdiction [
2]. In other words, although there is no law ‘for algae,’ the regulatory ecosystem already imposes a framework for action for those who research or innovate in this field.
These regulations should not be interpreted as an obstacle, but rather as a compass. They remind us that all research involving natural resources, and especially coastal resources, has an unavoidable ethical and environmental dimension. In the case of marine biomass research, this means planning environmental monitoring protocols, traceability and, where necessary, consultation processes with local communities from the outset. Scientific research in highly ecologically and socially sensitive contexts such as La Guajira cannot be separated from environmental management and territorial dialogue. However, the implications are administrative or ethical.
Policies also guide the direction of science. They determine funding priorities, strategic areas for public funds and sustainability requirements [81]. In fact, Minciencias’ current emphasis on bioeconomy, blue economy, and energy transition shows a clear tendency to articulate research, technology, and regulation. Therefore, understanding the regulatory framework becomes a strategic act, because those who know the policy can anticipate its changes and take advantage of its opportunities.
7. Conclusions
The multicriteria analysis confirms that coastal resources in regions like La Guajira possess remarkable potential for renewable energy integration. Technically, hybrid solar–wind systems and biomass valorisation from marine residues can ensure a constant and diversified energy supply. Economically, although biomass-based processes still face scalability limitations due to pre-treatment and handling costs, hybrid renewable configurations present growing competitiveness. From an environmental standpoint, harnessing marine biomass such as sargassum mitigates coastal pollution and promotes ecosystem resilience. Socially, the implementation of these technologies encourages local participation, knowledge exchange, and the creation of green jobs. In conclusion, the synergy among coastal renewable sources constitutes a strategic pathway towards the establishment of a resilient, circular, and regionally anchored bioeconomy that aligns with Colombia’s broader sustainable energy transition goals.
Author Contributions
R.F.C.-Q. participated in the review of the resources used, supervised the methodology and participated in the review of the manuscript. L.S.C.-M and S.P.-R participated in the construction of the original draft, and all the authors contributed to the overall supervision of the draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This project was supported by the program: 948 – 2024 ORQUÍDEAS MUJERES EN LA CIENCIA, 502 within the research Project: “Estudio de las posibilidades del uso de biomasa endógena colombiana 503 en la producción de bio-productos a través de métodos termo- y electro-catalíticos” Code: 109361. Besides, this research was supported by CANTABRIA COOPERA project “Ciencia, Tecnología, Educación y Cultura hacia una Colombia sostenible e incluyente: biocombustibles a partir de residuos en una zona vulnerable” with UCC ID: INV4019-C.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study.
Acknowledgments
The authors express their gratitude for the financial support given by the program: 948 – 2024 ORQUÍDEAS MUJERES EN LA CIENCIA, within the research Project: “Estudio de las posibilidades del uso de biomasa endógena colombiana en la producción de bio-productos a través de métodos termo- y electro-catalíticos” Code: 109361, and the CANTABRIA COOPERA project “Ciencia, Tecnología, Educación y Cultura hacia una Colombia sostenible e incluyente: biocombustibles a partir de residuos en una zona vulnerable”, with UCC ID: INV4019-C.
Conflicts of Interest
Author R.F.C.-Q. was employed by the company Fundacion BERSTIC. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| Bio-SNG |
Bio-Synthetic Natural Gas |
| CAM |
Crassulacean Acid Metabolism |
| CAPEX |
Capital Expenditures |
| CO2 |
Carbon Dioxide |
| DIMAR |
Dirección de Marina Mercante Colombiana |
| DSWEL |
Direct Seawater Electrolysis |
| FAO |
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations |
| GASB |
Great Atlantic Sargassum Belt |
| H₂ |
Hydrogen |
| HTL |
Hydrothermal Liquefaction |
| ICP-MS |
Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry |
| IDEAM |
Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales |
| INVEMAR |
Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras |
| LHV |
Lower Heating Value |
| MCA |
Multi-Criteria Analysis |
| MPA |
Marine Protected Area |
| OECD |
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development |
| OPEX |
Operating Expenses |
| OTEC |
Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion |
| R&D |
Research and Development |
| SaWS |
Sargassum Watch System |
| TEA |
Techno-Economic Assessment |
| TRL |
Technological Readiness Level |
| WLC |
Weighted Linear Combination |
References
- Naciones Unidas. (2022). Objetivo 14: Conservar y utilizar sosteniblemente los océanos, los mares y los recursos marinos. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/oceans/.
- Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras – INVEMAR. (2022). Lineamientos técnicos para el aprovechamiento sostenible de macroalgas marinas en Colombia. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. https://www.invemar.org.co/.
- European Commission. (2018). Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (RED II). Official Journal of the European Union, L 328, 82–209. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/? 11 December 3201.
- OECD. (2020). Ocean economy. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/ocean/ocean-economy.
- FAO. (2022). Marco estratégico de la FAO. https://www.fao.
- OECD. (2020). Ocean economy. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/ocean/ocean-economy.
- Gonçalves, M. A. A., Salvador, R., de Francisco, A. C., & Piekarski, C. M. (2024). Value recovery from waste in the processing of buckwheat: Opportunities for a circular bioeconomy. Engineering Reports, 6(7). [CrossRef]
- de Jesus Raposo, M. F., de Morais, R. M. S. C., & de Morais, A. M. M. B. (2013). Health applications of bioactive compounds from marine microalgae. Life Sciences, 93(15), 479–486. [CrossRef]
- Han, J.-M., Park, J.-S., & Chun, B.-S. (2025). Eco-friendly biorefinery process optimization from Sargassum thunbergii: A sustainable approach toward zero waste. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 142, 651–663. [CrossRef]
- Acosta-Chaparro, A., Sanchez-Valencia, L., Gomez-Lopez, D. I., Gonzalez-Corredor, J. D., & Navas-Camacho, R. (2022). Seagrass biomass and their role as carbon reservoirs in the localities of San Andres Island and La Guajira, Colombian Caribbean. Boletin de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, 51(1), 137–150. [CrossRef]
- Salvador, R., Eriksen, M. L., Kjaersgaard, N. C., Hedegaard, M., Knudby, T., Lund, V., & Larsen, S. B. (2025a). From ocean to meadow: A circular bioeconomy by transforming seaweed, seagrass, grass, and straw waste into high-value products. Waste Management, 200, 114753. [CrossRef]
- Colmenares-Quintero, R. , Rojas, N., Colmenares-Quintero, J., Stansfield, K., Villar-Villar, S., & Albericci-Avendaño, S. (2025). Design of an Integral Simulation Model for Solar-Powered Seawater Desalination in Coastal Communities: A Case Study in Manaure, La Guajira, Colombia. Sustainability, 17(4), 1505. [CrossRef]
- Nurohmah, A. R., Nisa, S. S., Stulasti, K. N. R., Yudha, C. S., Suci, W. G., Aliwarga, K., Widiyandari, H., & Purwanto, A. (2022). Sodium-ion battery from sea salt: a review. Materials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 11(1), 71–89. [CrossRef]
- Criollo, R., Vilarrasa, V., Orfila, A., Marbà, N., & Fernández-Mora, A. (2025). Borehole heat exchangers in coastal areas may reduce heatwave seagrass loss. Geoscience Letters, 12(1). [CrossRef]
- İlay, R. (2024). Biochar production from various low-cost marine wastes using different production methods: Characterization of biochar and marine feedstock for agricultural purposes. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 205. [CrossRef]
- Arya, R., Abinaya, K., Meenakumari, S., Thirumavalavan, M., Velmurugan, D., Anbu, P., & Pachaiappan, R. (2025). Exploring the separation, characterization and antioxidant activity of proteins and peptides from selected seagrasses in Palk Bay region of Tamil Nadu in India. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 295. [CrossRef]
- Olacia, E., Pisello, A. L., Chiodo, V., Maisano, S., Frazzica, A., & Cabeza, L. F. (2020). Sustainable adobe bricks with seagrass fibres. Mechanical and thermal properties characterization. Construction and Building Materials, 239. [CrossRef]
- Palacio-Herrera, F. M., De la Rosa, J., Sierra-Marquez, L., & Olivero-Verbel, J. (2025). Ecological risks of trace elements in sediments and Thalassia testudinum from Cartagena Bay. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 219. [CrossRef]
- Lee, R. A., & Lavoie, J.-M. (2013). From first- to third-generation biofuels: Challenges of producing a commodity from a biomass of increasing complexity. Animal Frontiers, 3(2), 6–11. [CrossRef]
- Moncada, J., Tamayo, J. A., & Cardona, C. A. (2014). Integrating first, second, and third generation biorefineries: Incorporating microalgae into the sugarcane biorefinery. Chemical Engineering Science, 118, 126–140. [CrossRef]
- Saravanan, A., Senthil Kumar, P., Badawi, M., Mohanakrishna, G., & Aminabhavi, T. M. (2023). Valorisation of micro-algae biomass for the development of green biorefinery: Perspectives on techno-economic analysis and the way towards sustainability. Chemical Engineering Journal, 453, 139754. [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y., Remón, J., Ding, W., Jiang, Z., Pinilla, J. L., Hu, C., & Suelves, I. (2024). An innovative ‘sea-thermal’ synergetic biorefinery for biofuel production: Co-valorization of lignocellulosic and algal biomasses using seawater under hydrothermal conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 462, 142719. [CrossRef]
- Geng, Y., Shaukat, A., Azhar, W., Raza, Q.-U.-A., Tahir, A., Abideen, M. Z. ul, Zia, M. A. B., Bashir, M. A., & Rehim, A. (2025). Microalgal biorefineries: a systematic review of technological trade-offs and innovation pathways. Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, 18(1), 93. [CrossRef]
- Twigg, G., Fedenko, J., Hurst, G., Stanley, M. S., & Hughes, A. D. (2024). A review of the current potential of European brown seaweed for the production of biofuels. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 14(1), 21. [CrossRef]
- Farobie, O., Amrullah, A., Syaftika, N., Bayu, A., Hartulistiyoso, E., Fatriasari, W., & Dani Nandiyanto, A. B. (2024). Valorization of Rejected Macroalgae Kappaphycopsis cottonii for Bio-Oil and Bio-Char Production via Slow Pyrolysis. ACS Omega, 9(14), 16665–16675. [CrossRef]
- Wang, M., Hu, C., Barnes, B. B., Mitchum, G., Lapointe, B., & Montoya, J. P. (2019). Understanding the Sargassum phenomenon in the Tropical Atlantic Ocean: From satellite monitoring to stranding forecast. Science, 365(6448), 83–87. [CrossRef]
- Ordóñez, J. I., Cortés, S., Maluenda, P., & Soto, I. (2023). Biosorption of Heavy Metals with Algae: Critical Review of Its Application in Real Effluents. Sustainability, 15(6), 5521. [CrossRef]
- van Hees, D. H., Olsen, Y. S., Mattio, L., Ruiz--Montoya, L., Wernberg, T., & Kendrick, G. A. (2019). Cast adrift: Physiology and dispersal of benthic Sargassum spinuligerum in surface rafts. Limnology and Oceanography, 64(2), 526–540. [CrossRef]
- Hu, C., Murch, B., Barnes, B., Wang, M., Maréchal, J.-P., Franks, J., Johnson, D., Lapointe, B., Goodwin, D., Schell, J., & Siuda, A. (2016). Sargassum Watch Warns of Incoming Seaweed. Eos, 97. [CrossRef]
- Fraga, J., & Robledo, D. (2022). Covid-19 and Sargassum blooms: impacts and social issues in a mass tourism destination (Mexican Caribbean). Maritime Studies, 21(2), 159–171. [CrossRef]
- Gavio, B., & Santos-Martinez, A. (2018). Floating Sargassum; in Serranilla Bank, Caribbean Colombia, may jeopardize the race to the ocean of baby sea turtles. Acta Biológica Colombiana, 23(3), 311–313. [CrossRef]
- Coronado-Franco, K. V., Selvaraj, J. J., & Mancera Pineda, J. E. (2018). Algal blooms detection in Colombian Caribbean Sea using MODIS imagery. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 133, 791–798. [CrossRef]
- Medina, Ernesto., Huber, Otto., Nassar, J. M.., & Navarro, Pamela. (2013). Recorriendo el paisaje vegetal de Venezuela. IVIC.
- Honorato-Salazar, J. A., Aburto, J., & Amezcua-Allieri, M. A. (2021). Agave and opuntia species as sustainable feedstocks for bioenergy and byproducts. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 13, Issue 21). [CrossRef]
- Loizzo, M. R., Bruno, M., Balzano, M., Giardinieri, A., Pacetti, D., Frega, N. G., Sicari, V., Leporini, M., & Tundis, R. (2019). Comparative Chemical Composition and Bioactivity of Opuntia ficus-indica Sanguigna and Surfarina Seed Oils Obtained by Traditional and Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Procedures. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 121(1). [CrossRef]
- Timpanaro, G., & Foti, V. T. (2025). Sustainable extraction of bioproducts from cactus pear waste: Economic viability and market opportunities in a green economy. Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 10. [CrossRef]
- Emanuele, L., Dujaković, T., Roselli, G., Campanelli, S., & Bellesi, G. (2023). The Use of a Natural Polysaccharide as a Solidifying Agent and Color-Fixing Agent on Modern Paper and Historical Materials. Organics, 4(2), 265–276. [CrossRef]
- Mannai, F., Elhleli, H., Ammar, M., Passas, R., Elaloui, E., & Moussaoui, Y. (2018). Green process for fibrous networks extraction from Opuntia (Cactaceae): Morphological design, thermal and mechanical studies. Industrial Crops and Products, 126, 347–356. [CrossRef]
- Hernandez, E., Espinosa-Solares, T., Pérez-Cadena, R., Téllez-Jurado, A., & Ramírez-Arpide, F. R. (2024). Sustainable agrobiorefinery system for advanced ethanol production from Opuntia prickly pear cactus nopales. Energy Conversion and Management, 321. [CrossRef]
- Pazmiño Abad, K. G. (2021). OBTENCIÓN DE BIOPLÁSTICO A PARTIR DEL MUCÍLAGO DE CACTUS (Opuntia ficus-indica) PARA USO COMO ENVOLTURAS ALIMENTICIAS [Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo]. https://dspace.espoch.edu.ec:8080/server/api/core/bitstreams/eeb4c72c-9b3f-4a82-9c1b-4f00136282f8/content.
- Villalobos, S., Orlando Vargas, B. ;, & Melo, S. (2007). USO, MANEJO Y CONSERVACIÓN DE “yosú”, Stenocereus griseus (CACTACEAE), EN LA ALTA GUAJIRA COLOMBIANA Usage, Managment and Conservation of “yosú”, Stenocereus griseus (Cactaceae), in the Upper Guajira, Colombia. Acta Biológica Colombiana, 12(1), 99–112. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-548X2007000100008.
- Wang, Z. L., Jiang, T., & Xu, L. (2017). Toward the blue energy dream by triboelectric nanogenerator networks. In Nano Energy (Vol. 39, pp. 9–23). Elsevier Ltd. [CrossRef]
- Arias, F. J., & Heras, S. D. Las. (2020). Ocean salt basins energy harvesting. Applied Ocean Research, 98. [CrossRef]
- Cheng, L., Abraham, J., Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J., Boyer, T., Mann, M. E., Zhu, J., Wang, F., Locarnini, R., Li, Y., Zhang, B., Yu, F., Wan, L., Chen, X., Feng, L., Song, X., Liu, Y., Reseghetti, F., Simoncelli, S., … Li, G. (2023). Another Year of Record Heat for the Oceans. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 40(6), 963–974. [CrossRef]
- Benito-González, I.; López-Rubio, A.; Martínez-Abad, A.; Ballester, A.-R.; Falcó, I.; González-Candelas, L.; Sánchez, G.; Lozano-Sánchez, J.; Borrás-Linares, I.; Segura-Carretero, A.; et al. In-Depth Characterization of Bioactive Extracts from Posidonia oceanica Waste Biomass. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 409. [CrossRef]
- Millán, S., Rivas, N., & Chasqui, L. (2024). First report on the distribution and extension of seagrass meadows in Quitasueño Coral Bank, Southwestern Caribbean. Acta Biológica Colombiana, 29(1), 136–139. [CrossRef]
- García-Bonilla, E., González, P., Pirateque, L., Guerrero-Kommritz, J., Puyana, M., & Acosta, A. (2020). SEA GRASSES, A NEW UNREPORTED HABITAT FOR THE HETEROBRANCH MOLLUSK Umbraculum umbraculum IN THE CARIBBEAN REGION. Marine and Fishery Sciences, 33(1), 129–133. [CrossRef]
- Sierra-Rozo, O., Santos-Martínez, A., & Acero, A. (2012). Prospección ecológica del manglar y praderas marinas como hábitats de cría para peces arrecifales en San Andres Isla, Caribe Insular colombiano. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, 41(Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras). http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/mar/v41n2/v41n2a07.pdf.
- Gustafsson, C., Hovey, R. K., Olsen, Y. S., Statton, J., & Kendrick, G. A. (2025). Functional traits are moderate predictors of above- and below-ground biomass in multispecies seagrass habitats. Functional Ecology, 39(6), 1522–1536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.70058. [CrossRef]
- Cao, L., Yu, I. K. M., Cho, D. W., Wang, D., Tsang, D. C. W., Zhang, S., Ding, S., Wang, L., & Ok, Y. S. (2019). Microwave-assisted low-temperature hydrothermal treatment of red seaweed (Gracilaria lemaneiformis) for production of levulinic acid and algae hydrochar. Bioresource Technology, 273, 251–258. [CrossRef]
- Piedra Castro, L. M., & Ramírez-Vargas, M. A. (2023). Arribo masivo de sargazo (Sargassum natans) a la costa del Caribe Sur de Costa Rica durante el 2022. Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, 52(2), 167–172. [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, C. (2023). Escape from Sargasso Sea: Tremendous Sargassum Blooms Challenge Caribbean and Atlantic Communities. Environmental Health Perspectives, 131(9). [CrossRef]
- Gori, B., Ulian, T., Bernal, H. Y., & Diazgranados, M. (2022). Understanding the diversity and biogeography of Colombian edible plants. Scientific Reports, 12(1). [CrossRef]
- Carbonó Delahoz, E., Barros Barraza, A., & Jiménez Vergara, J. (2013). CACTACEAE DE SANTA MARTA, MAGDALENA, COLOMBIA. Revista Académica Colombiana de Ciencias, 37, 11. http://www.theplantlist.org.
- Amaral, D. T., Bonatelli, I. A. S., Romeiro-Brito, M., Moraes, E. M., & Franco, F. F. (2022). Spatial patterns of evolutionary diversity in Cactaceae show low ecological representation within protected areas. [CrossRef]
- Caceres Duran, L. G., & Castiblanco Molina, L. X. (2020). Evaluación de la Opuntia Ficus Indica (Cactus) como coagulante natural para el tratamiento de agua potable de la empresa Emservilla en el municipio de Ubaté. Universidad de América. https://repository.uamerica.edu.co/server/api/core/bitstreams/1adf534f-5338-4079-a068-b610edfc45b8/content.
- Delgado Marín, J. P. (2020). Estudio de viabilidad tecno-económica de una planta de generación eléctrica a partir de la digestión anaeróbica del cactus nopal en Colombia. Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena. https://repositorio.upct.es/server/api/core/bitstreams/41a718cb-44b3-4a8b-8535-0d7c96e9b33c/content.
- Salazar Sánchez, L. C., Acosta, A., Romero-Tibabuzo, C. C., Guerrero-Kommritz, J., Duerñas, P. R., Borrero-Pérez, G. H., Bocanegra, V., Acero, A., Campos, N. H., Puyana Hegedus, M., Zea, S., & Ruiz-Pino, D. (2021). Fauna Marina: Bahía de Taganga, Caribe Colombiano. 2021. [CrossRef]
- Vargas-Brochero, J., Hurtado-Castillo, S., Altamiranda, J., de Menezes Filho, F. C. M., Beluco, A., & Canales, F. A. (2024). Optimizing Renewable Energy Systems for Water Security: A Comparative Study of Reanalysis Models. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(11). [CrossRef]
- Ishaq, H., & Crawford, C. (2024). Addressing Freshwater Scarcity and Hydrogen Production: Offshore Wind and Reverse Osmosis Synergies. Advanced Sustainable Systems, 8(12). [CrossRef]
- Feria--Díaz, J. J., Correa--Mahecha, F., López--Méndez, M. C., Rodríguez--Miranda, J. P., & Barrera--Rojas, J. (2021). Recent desalination technologies by hybridization and integration with reverse osmosis: A review. In Water (Switzerland) (Vol. 13, Issue 10). MDPI. [CrossRef]
- Cath, T. Y., Hancock, N. T., Lundin, C. D., Hoppe-Jones, C., & Drewes, J. E. (2010). A multi-barrier osmotic dilution process for simultaneous desalination and purification of impaired water. Journal of Membrane Science, 362(1–2), 417–426. [CrossRef]
- Vanegas Chamorro, M. J., Rodríguez, P., & Cárdenas, L. (2017). Estudio del potencial de la radiación solar en La Guajira a partir de registros meteorológicos y modelos atmosféricos. Revista Espacios, 38(45), 21.
- Chamorro, H., Blanco, J., & Rojas, L. (2020). Evaluación de series históricas de radiación solar en la región Caribe colombiana: potencial energético y aplicaciones. Revista Colombiana de Energía, 7(1), 45-59. [CrossRef]
- Romero-Garcia, A., Pérez, D., & González, J. (2021). Caracterización geoespacial de la radiación solar global en el Caribe colombiano: implicaciones para proyectos de energía renovable. Energía y Sociedad, 6(2), 85-98. [CrossRef]
- Carvajal Romo, J. E., Sánchez, A. F., & Cárdenas, J. J. (2019). Evaluación del recurso solar en el Caribe colombiano para aplicaciones fotovoltaicas. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, 28(52), 63-74. [CrossRef]
- Luengo, C.A.G.; Amâncio-Vieira, S.F.; Fidelis, R.; Contani, E.A.d.R. Application of a Multicriteria Decision Model for the Selection of Conversion Pathways for Biofuel Production and Management in a Medium-Sized Municipality in the State of Paraná. Energies 2025, 18, 2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hemavathy, R. V. , Ragini, Y. P., Shruthi, S., Ranjani, S., Subhashini, S., & Thamarai, P. (2025). Biofuel production from marine macroalgae: Pathways, technologies, and sustainable energy solutions. Industrial Crops and Products, 224, 120282. [CrossRef]
- Soleymani, M. , & Rosentrater, K. (2017). Techno-Economic Analysis of Biofuel Production from Macroalgae (Seaweed). Bioengineering, 4(4), 92. [CrossRef]
- Amador-Castro, F. , García-Cayuela, T., Alper, H. S., Rodriguez-Martinez, V., & Carrillo-Nieves, D. (2021). Valorization of pelagic sargassum biomass into sustainable applications: Current trends and challenges. Journal of Environmental Management, 283, 112013. [CrossRef]
- Orozco-González, J. G. , Amador-Castro, F., Gordillo-Sierra, A. R., García-Cayuela, T., Alper, H. S., & Carrillo-Nieves, D. (2022). Opportunities Surrounding the Use of Sargassum Biomass as Precursor of Biogas, Bioethanol, and Biodiesel Production. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8. [CrossRef]
- Salgado-Hernández, E. , Ortiz-Ceballos, Á. I., Alvarado-Lassman, A., Martínez-Hernández, S., Rosas-Mendoza, E. S., Velázquez-Fernández, J. B., & Dorantes-Acosta, A. E. (2023). Energy-saving pretreatments affect pelagic Sargassum composition and DNA metabarcoding reveals the microbial community involved in methane yield. PLOS ONE, 18(8), e0289972. [CrossRef]
- Kositkanawuth, K. , Bhatt, A., Sattler, M., & Dennis, B. (2017). Renewable Energy from Waste: Investigation of Co-pyrolysis between Sargassum Macroalgae and Polystyrene. Energy & Fuels, 31(5), 5088–5096. [CrossRef]
- PROCOLOMBIA. (2025). An Ocean of Opportunities: Colombia Embraces Offshore Wind Energy. https://investincolombia.com.co/en/resources/offshore-wind-energy-colombia.
- Grattan, S. (2025). Big firms abandon wind energy plans in Colombia amid regulatory shifts, social issues and grid gaps | AP News. https://apnews.com/article/colombia-wind-energy-companies-climate-56dd34be39a393a4041e9431bdd45e0b.
- Chae, S., Kim, H., Gi Hong, J., Jang, J., Higa, M., Pishnamazi, M., Choi, J.-Y., Chandula Walgama, R., Bae, C., Kim, I. S., & Park, J.-S. (2023). Clean power generation from salinity gradient using reverse electrodialysis technologies: Recent advances, bottlenecks, and future direction. Chemical Engineering Journal, 452, 139482. [CrossRef]
- Gül, T. F., Akalın, M., Dönmezler, E. N., Bolat, A., Cihanoğlu, A., Güler, E., & Kabay, N. (2024). Review on reverse electrodialysis process-a pioneering technology for energy generation by salinity gradient. Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology, 3. [CrossRef]
- Shetty, B. , Puranam-Rajashekar, S., Aralikatti, G. H., Nagaraj, P., Kumar, L. H., Tengli, P. N., Thakur, M. S., Sridhar, & Krishnappa, M. (2025). Seawater electrolysis: A critical review on fundamentals, recent progress, and future perspectives on sustainable hydrogen generation. Next Energy, 9, 100407. [CrossRef]
- Aminuddin, M. F., Ullah, R., Masdar, M. S., Yunus, R. M., Majlan, E. H., Baharudin, N. A., Daud, N. M. R. N. M., & Husaini, T. (2025). A direct seawater electrolysis (DSWEL) for hydrogen production: A review of system design components and advancements. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 144, 336–358. [CrossRef]
- Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2014). Ley 1715 de 2014, por medio de la cual se regula la integración de las energías renovables no convencionales al sistema energético nacional. Diario Oficial No. 49.150. https://www.upme.gov.co/normatividad/ley1715_2014.pdf.
Figure 1.
Literature screening and inclusion process, adapted from PRISMA 2020.
Figure 1.
Literature screening and inclusion process, adapted from PRISMA 2020.
Figure 2.
Group of bioproducts that have been studied for production from Sargassum. (1) biomaterials; (2) energy carriers; (3) biocomposites; and (4) other products. Source: Authors.
Figure 2.
Group of bioproducts that have been studied for production from Sargassum. (1) biomaterials; (2) energy carriers; (3) biocomposites; and (4) other products. Source: Authors.
Figure 3.
Dynamics of the ecosystem where algae live and interact. Source: Adapted from [
32].
Figure 3.
Dynamics of the ecosystem where algae live and interact. Source: Adapted from [
32].
Figure 4.
Seagrass beds in the Colombian insular zone. The distribution of seagrasses in the island zone extends from the islands of A. San Andrés, B. Providencia to C. Coral reefs and protected areas to the north. Source: Authors.
Figure 4.
Seagrass beds in the Colombian insular zone. The distribution of seagrasses in the island zone extends from the islands of A. San Andrés, B. Providencia to C. Coral reefs and protected areas to the north. Source: Authors.
Figure 5.
Seagrass beds distributed throughout La Guajira, Colombia. Source: Authors.
Figure 5.
Seagrass beds distributed throughout La Guajira, Colombia. Source: Authors.
Figure 6.
Macroalgae ecosystems where sargassum species can be present in La Guajira. Source: Authors.
Figure 6.
Macroalgae ecosystems where sargassum species can be present in La Guajira. Source: Authors.
Figure 7.
Regions where a variety of cacti are distributed in Colombia. Source: Authors.
Figure 7.
Regions where a variety of cacti are distributed in Colombia. Source: Authors.
Figure 8.
Products obtained from salt water (1) Through reverse osmosis, (2) Through electrolysis of treated water, temperature gradient, salinity gradient, ocean currents, (3) Through hybrid technologies, (4) Brine processing. Source: Authors.
Figure 8.
Products obtained from salt water (1) Through reverse osmosis, (2) Through electrolysis of treated water, temperature gradient, salinity gradient, ocean currents, (3) Through hybrid technologies, (4) Brine processing. Source: Authors.
Figure 9.
Products obtained from salt water (1) Through reverse osmosis, (2) Through electrolysis of treated water, temperature gradient, salinity gradient, ocean currents, (3) Through hybrid technologies, (4) Brine processing. Source: Authors.
Figure 9.
Products obtained from salt water (1) Through reverse osmosis, (2) Through electrolysis of treated water, temperature gradient, salinity gradient, ocean currents, (3) Through hybrid technologies, (4) Brine processing. Source: Authors.
Table 1.
Examples of trending products obtained from the use of third-generation biomass in biorefinery systems.
Table 1.
Examples of trending products obtained from the use of third-generation biomass in biorefinery systems.
| Algae species |
Main products |
Main challenges |
References |
| Several species |
Biofuels (biodiesel, bioethanol, biogas), bioproducts (pigments, antioxidants, food, cosmetics), nutrient recovery, co-products |
It assesses the technological and economic bottlenecks involved in moving from pilot to commercial scale, and how this affects the efficiency of the various subsystems. |
[23] |
| Laminaria, Saccharina, Fucus spiralis, Laminaria hyperborea |
Bioethanol, biogas, anaerobic digestion, use as feedstock for biomass fuels, including HTL (hydrothermal liquefaction) in some cases. |
Discussed that choosing species with high productivity, rapid growth, and environmental tolerance is key; drying, transport, and logistics costs continue to be significant. |
[24] |
| Kappaphycopsis cottonii |
Biochar and bio-oil |
Demonstrates an approach to waste utilisation (industrial processing waste) to obtain value-added products but the challenges are yield, pyrolysis cost, bio-oil stability. |
[25] |
Table 2.
Applications of cactus biomass in different countries.
Table 2.
Applications of cactus biomass in different countries.
| Country/region |
Specie |
Main application |
References |
| Italy |
Opuntia ficus-indica (Sanguigna, Surfarina) |
Oils (seed), pectins, antioxidants, functional juices |
[35,36] |
| Tunisia |
Opuntia ficus-indica |
Biocomposites, packaging, paper |
[38] |
| Mexico |
Opuntia, Agave |
Biogas, bio-SNG, bioethanol, biodiesel, tequila and mezcal |
[34,39] |
| Ecuador |
Opuntia ficus-indica |
Bioplastics (mucilage) |
[40] |
Table 3.
TRL for the main technologies applied for each coastal raw material.
Table 3.
TRL for the main technologies applied for each coastal raw material.
| Raw material |
Main technological routes |
TRL |
| Seagrass |
Composting, adsorbents for water treatment, building materials (panels, bricks), extraction of bioactive proteins and peptides. |
TRL 4–7. |
| Sargassum |
Anaerobic digestion, HTL, pyrolysis, fractionation for bioproducts (pigments, antioxidants), and biocomposites. |
TRL 5–8. |
| Cactus |
Enzymatic fermentation for bioethanol, anaerobic digestion, mucilage extraction for bioplastics, pectin, oil and fibre extraction for biocomposites. |
TRL 5–8. |
| Seawater and saline resources |
Ocean thermal energy conversion, tidal and wave energy, osmotic energy, and reverse osmosis desalination integrated with renewables. |
TRL 5–9. |
Table 4.
Area of Colombian seagrass beds by department.
Table 4.
Area of Colombian seagrass beds by department.
| Zone |
Seagrass area (ha) |
| La Guajira |
56.386,41 |
| Archipelago of Saint Andrew and Providence |
2.002,35 |
| Bolívar |
2.712,72 |
| Caribbean Chocó |
350,26 |
| Córdoba |
18,95 |
| Magdalena |
89,54 |
| Sucre |
3.176,18 |
| Total area |
64.736,41 |
Table 5.
Areas of potential seagrass meadows.
Table 5.
Areas of potential seagrass meadows.
| Zone |
Potential seagrass areas (ha) |
| Caribbean Chocó |
46,43 |
| Sucre |
236,92 |
| La Guajira |
81.702,72 |
| Total area |
81.986,06 |
Table 7.
Calculations of the energy potential of seagrasses in La Guajira.
Table 7.
Calculations of the energy potential of seagrasses in La Guajira.
| Scenario |
Dry density ρ (kg/m2) |
Mass (tonne) |
LHV (MJ/kg) |
Total energy (GWh) |
| Minimum |
0,20 |
112.773,82 |
15,00 |
469,89 |
| Average |
0,60 |
338.318,46 |
17,50 |
1.644,60 |
| Maximum |
1,00 |
563.864,10 |
20,00 |
3.132,58 |
Table 8.
Calculations of the energy potential of sargassum in La Guajira.
Table 8.
Calculations of the energy potential of sargassum in La Guajira.
| Estimate |
Fresh biomass (tonne/year) |
Dry matter (20%) (tonne) |
LHV (MJ/kg) |
Theoretical energy (GWh) |
| Minimum |
23.000 |
4.600 |
10 |
12,8 |
| Maximum |
68.000 |
13.600 |
12 |
45,3 |
| Average |
45.500 |
9.100 |
11 |
29,05 |
Table 9.
Cactus species found in the Colombian Caribbean.
Table 9.
Cactus species found in the Colombian Caribbean.
| Cactus species |
Subspecies |
| Acanthocereus |
Acanthocereus tetragonus |
| Cereus |
Cereus hildmannianus |
| Hylocereus |
Hylocereus costaricensis |
| Melocactus |
Melocactus curvispinus |
| Nopalea |
Nopalea cochenillifera |
| Opuntia |
Opuntia caracassana |
| Pereskia |
Pereskia bleo |
| Pereskia guamacho |
| Pilosocereus |
Pilosocereus lanuginosus |
| Pseudorhipsalis |
Pseudorhipsalis amazonica |
| Rhipsalis |
Rhipsalis baccifera |
Table 10.
Calculations of the energy potential of cacti in La Guajira.
Table 10.
Calculations of the energy potential of cacti in La Guajira.
| Estimate |
Dry density ρ (tonne/ha) |
Total mass (tonne) |
Usable 10% (kg) |
LHV (MJ/kg) |
Theoretical energy (GWh) |
| Minimum |
2 |
320.000 |
32.000.000 |
14 |
124,40 |
| Average |
6 |
960.000 |
96.000.000 |
16 |
426,70 |
| Maximum |
10 |
1.600.000 |
160.000.000 |
18 |
800,00 |
Table 11.
Evaluation criteria data, biomass alternatives and ranges to be evaluated in Definite. The different types of criteria used in the multi-criteria analysis were defined based on the information previously researched and analysed in this article, as well as on complementary references, including [
67].
Table 11.
Evaluation criteria data, biomass alternatives and ranges to be evaluated in Definite. The different types of criteria used in the multi-criteria analysis were defined based on the information previously researched and analysed in this article, as well as on complementary references, including [
67].
| |
Unit |
Seagrases |
Sargassum |
Cacti |
Min/Max |
| Energy Potential |
GWh/year |
1.645 |
29 |
427 |
0,00/1.645 |
| TRL |
Ordinal |
6 |
7 |
7 |
1/9 |
| Economic feasibility |
Ordinal |
3 |
5 |
4 |
1/5 |
| Environmental sustainability |
Ordinal |
4 |
3 |
3 |
1/5 |
| Social benefit and local integration |
Ordinal |
3 |
5 |
5 |
1/5 |
| Availability and logistic viability |
Ordinal |
2 |
5 |
5 |
1/5 |
| Circular bioeconomy potential |
Ordinal |
5 |
5 |
4 |
1/5 |
Table 12.
Main technical, economic, and socio-environmental impacts of coastal resource exploitation.
Table 12.
Main technical, economic, and socio-environmental impacts of coastal resource exploitation.
| Resource |
Technical aspects |
Economic aspects |
Socio-environmental aspects |
References |
| Macroalgae (growing) |
Technologies: open sea or tank cultivation; conversion: fermentation (bioethanol), anaerobic digestion (biogas), pyrolysis/gasification, lipid extraction. Maturity: demo-scale pilots, various R&D routes. Challenges: harvesting, drying, composition variability. |
High cultivation/harvesting and processing costs; economics depend on co-products (food, cosmetics) and scale. According to TEAs, viability improves with integration (biorefineries). |
Positive: does not compete with agricultural land; risk: local impacts on ecosystems if crops are poorly managed; nutrient management and eutrophication. |
[68,69] |
| Sargassum (waste) |
Conversions: anaerobic digestion (biogas), bioethanol, compost, pyrolysis/gasification. Maturity: applied studies and pilot projects; pretreatment improves performance. |
Economically attractive as low-cost feedstock (waste problem), but coastal logistics and sanitation increase OPEX. Variable-value feedstock model necessary; can be profitable if supply chain is stable. Good candidate for regional plants. |
Greater benefit (cleans beaches) but beware of contaminants (metals, pathogens), emissions from decomposition on beaches if not collected. |
[70,71,72] |
| Fisheries/aquaculture waste |
Classic routes: oil extraction → biodiesel; digestion → biogas; more technically mature. |
Feedstock with variable value; can be profitable if supply chain is stable. Good candidate for regional plants. |
Risks of contamination if not managed; positive nutrient recovery. |
[73] |
| Sun + Wind (coastal and offshore) |
Mature technologies: solar photovoltaic, onshore/offshore wind. Offshore: high energy density and high capacity factors. Requirements: grid connection, storage, civil works. |
High CAPEX (especially offshore) but levelised energy costs have fallen. Challenges: permits, grid, social acceptance. Projects in Colombia moving forward (energy transition). |
Low emissions; local impacts (landscape, marine fauna/birds); social: consultation with indigenous communities crucial. |
[74,75] |
| Salinity gradient |
Conceptual Reverse electrodialysis and Osmotic energy; ionic membranes and critical coatings; still at pilot/demo scale. |
Current costs high due to membranes; good potential in estuaries with continuous flow. Viable if membrane costs are reduced and economies of scale are achieved. |
Low emissions; requires brine management and design to avoid impact on estuaries. |
[76] |
| Seawater electrolysis/green hydrogen |
Rapidly advancing technology: direct seawater electrolysis (DSWEL) and chloride-tolerant electrolysers. Requirements: integration with renewables and/or desalination. Maturity: R&D/pilot; challenges: corrosion, by-products, efficiency. |
H₂ costs still high; but costs fall if cheap renewable electricity is available and costly desalination is avoided. Potential for export (H₂ or ammonia) from advantageous coastal areas. |
H₂ clean at the end of the chain; risks: management of chlorinated products, brine; positive impacts on decarbonisation if done well. |
[77,78,79] |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).