Submitted:
04 November 2025
Posted:
05 November 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Global Overview
3.1. Raw Materials
3.1.1. Seagrases
3.1.2. Algae and Sargassum
3.1.3. Cacti
3.1.4. Saltwater Energy Potential
3.2. Technologies Applied for Each Raw Material
4. Case of Study: La Guajira, Colombia
4.1. Seagrasses Locally
| Type of trace element | Element | Concentration rate (µg/kg) | |
| Toxic | Thallium | TI | 25,9 – 323 |
| Bismuth | Bi | 30,3 – 671 | |
| Antimony | Sb | 57,1 – 671 | |
| Cadmium | Cd | 74,4 – 972 | |
| Arsenic | As | 159 – 5.655 | |
| Lead | Pb | 1.982 – 20.396 | |
| Excessively toxic | Selenium | Se | 3,4 – 1.319 |
| Beryllium | Be | 10 – 718 | |
| Cobalt | Co | 10,0 – 5.652 | |
| Lithium | Li | 66,3 – 15.381 | |
| Nickel | Ni | 1.119 – 16.562 | |
| Vanadium | V | 1.379 – 60.711 | |
| Cooper | Cu | 1.870 – 198.492 | |
| Chromium | Cr | 2.897 – 32.732 | |
| Lanthanides | Thulium | Tm | 1,9 – 162 |
| Terbium | Tb | 2,1 – 356 | |
| Lutetium | Lu | 2,3 – 154 | |
| Europium | Eu | 3,9 – 600 | |
| Holmium | Ho | 3,2 – 383 | |
| Samarium | Sm | 7,9 – 2.316 | |
| Dysprosium | Dy | 11,9 – 1.946 | |
| Erbium | Er | 12,1 – 1.127 | |
| Gadolinium | Gd | 12,5 – 2.919 | |
| Ytterbium | Yb | 10,2 – 1.049 | |
| Praseodymium | Pr | 10,9 – 2.995 | |
| Neodymium | Nd | 50,3 – 11.866 | |
| Cerium | Ce | 51,5 – 25.565 | |
| Lanthanum | La | 43,3 – 12.881 | |
| Actinides | Thorium | Th | 7,4 – 5.465 |
| Uranium | U | 419 – 10.825 | |
| Micronutrients | Molybdenum | Mo | 10 – 27.726 |
| Boron | B | 1.051 – 48.4596 | |
| Zinc | Zn | 29.686 – 18.2425 | |
| Other elements | Tantalum | Ta | 4 – 1.705 |
| Tungsten | W | 3,3 – 753 | |
| Cesium | Cs | 3,8 – 1.199 | |
| Hafnium | Hf | 6,4 – 909 | |
| Niobium | Nb | 5,1 – 6.792 | |
| Tin | Sn | 28,8 – 3.319 | |
| Gallium | Ga | 22,1 – 6.790 | |
| Barium | Ba | 18,8 – 6.512 | |
| Germanium | Ge | 71,7 – 2.480 | |
| Scandium | Sc | 71,2 – 6.901 | |
| Yttrium | Y | 152 – 10.185 | |
| Zirconium | Zr | 380 – 29.373 | |
| Rubidium | Rb | 719 – 26.020 | |
| Strontium | Sr | 220.401 – 3.380.869 | |
4.2. Sargassum Locally
- Caribbean ocean currents flowing westward, but the main flow of the sargassum belt passes further north, skirting the Greater Antilles.
- High wave energy and trade winds that hinder the accumulation of floating biomass.
- Slightly higher temperature and salinity and arid areas with little nutrient runoff (unlike areas further south in the Caribbean).
4.3. Cacti Locally
4.4. Saltwater: Energy Potential and Access to Water Resources for Communities
4.5. Coastal Winds and Solar Radiation
5. Comparative Discussion of the Impact on Energy Carrier Products in La Guajira
- Energy potential: 20% - representing the quantitative contribution of each biomass to renewable energy generation.
- Technological readiness level (TRL): 10% - reflecting the current stage of technological maturity for biomass conversion processes.
- Environmental sustainability: 20% - emphasising the ecological integrity and long-term resilience of each biomass resource.
- Economic feasibility: 15% - accounting for cost-efficiency and ease of implementation for local communities.
- Social benefit and local integration: 15% - highlighting the relevance of social inclusion, employment potential, and community well-being.
- Availability and logistic viability: 10% - capturing accessibility, transport feasibility, and resource stability throughout the year.
- Circular bioeconomy potential: 10% - integrating the capacity of each biomass to generate multiple value-added products beyond energy.
6. Policy and Research Implications
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| Bio-SNG | Bio-Synthetic Natural Gas |
| CAM | Crassulacean Acid Metabolism |
| CAPEX | Capital Expenditures |
| CO2 | Carbon Dioxide |
| DIMAR | Dirección de Marina Mercante Colombiana |
| DSWEL | Direct Seawater Electrolysis |
| FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations |
| GASB | Great Atlantic Sargassum Belt |
| H₂ | Hydrogen |
| HTL | Hydrothermal Liquefaction |
| ICP-MS | Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry |
| IDEAM | Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales |
| INVEMAR | Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras |
| LHV | Lower Heating Value |
| MCA | Multi-Criteria Analysis |
| MPA | Marine Protected Area |
| OECD | Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development |
| OPEX | Operating Expenses |
| OTEC | Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion |
| R&D | Research and Development |
| SaWS | Sargassum Watch System |
| TEA | Techno-Economic Assessment |
| TRL | Technological Readiness Level |
| WLC | Weighted Linear Combination |
References
- Naciones Unidas. (2022). Objetivo 14: Conservar y utilizar sosteniblemente los océanos, los mares y los recursos marinos. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/oceans/.
- Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras – INVEMAR. (2022). Lineamientos técnicos para el aprovechamiento sostenible de macroalgas marinas en Colombia. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. https://www.invemar.org.co/.
- European Commission. (2018). Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (RED II). Official Journal of the European Union, L 328, 82–209. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/? 11 December 3201.
- OECD. (2020). Ocean economy. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/ocean/ocean-economy.
- FAO. (2022). Marco estratégico de la FAO. https://www.fao.
- OECD. (2020). Ocean economy. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/ocean/ocean-economy.
- Gonçalves, M. A. A., Salvador, R., de Francisco, A. C., & Piekarski, C. M. (2024). Value recovery from waste in the processing of buckwheat: Opportunities for a circular bioeconomy. Engineering Reports, 6(7). [CrossRef]
- de Jesus Raposo, M. F., de Morais, R. M. S. C., & de Morais, A. M. M. B. (2013). Health applications of bioactive compounds from marine microalgae. Life Sciences, 93(15), 479–486. [CrossRef]
- Han, J.-M., Park, J.-S., & Chun, B.-S. (2025). Eco-friendly biorefinery process optimization from Sargassum thunbergii: A sustainable approach toward zero waste. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 142, 651–663. [CrossRef]
- Acosta-Chaparro, A., Sanchez-Valencia, L., Gomez-Lopez, D. I., Gonzalez-Corredor, J. D., & Navas-Camacho, R. (2022). Seagrass biomass and their role as carbon reservoirs in the localities of San Andres Island and La Guajira, Colombian Caribbean. Boletin de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, 51(1), 137–150. [CrossRef]
- Salvador, R., Eriksen, M. L., Kjaersgaard, N. C., Hedegaard, M., Knudby, T., Lund, V., & Larsen, S. B. (2025a). From ocean to meadow: A circular bioeconomy by transforming seaweed, seagrass, grass, and straw waste into high-value products. Waste Management, 200, 114753. [CrossRef]
- Colmenares-Quintero, R. , Rojas, N., Colmenares-Quintero, J., Stansfield, K., Villar-Villar, S., & Albericci-Avendaño, S. (2025). Design of an Integral Simulation Model for Solar-Powered Seawater Desalination in Coastal Communities: A Case Study in Manaure, La Guajira, Colombia. Sustainability, 17(4), 1505. [CrossRef]
- Nurohmah, A. R., Nisa, S. S., Stulasti, K. N. R., Yudha, C. S., Suci, W. G., Aliwarga, K., Widiyandari, H., & Purwanto, A. (2022). Sodium-ion battery from sea salt: a review. Materials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 11(1), 71–89. [CrossRef]
- Criollo, R., Vilarrasa, V., Orfila, A., Marbà, N., & Fernández-Mora, A. (2025). Borehole heat exchangers in coastal areas may reduce heatwave seagrass loss. Geoscience Letters, 12(1). [CrossRef]
- İlay, R. (2024). Biochar production from various low-cost marine wastes using different production methods: Characterization of biochar and marine feedstock for agricultural purposes. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 205. [CrossRef]
- Arya, R., Abinaya, K., Meenakumari, S., Thirumavalavan, M., Velmurugan, D., Anbu, P., & Pachaiappan, R. (2025). Exploring the separation, characterization and antioxidant activity of proteins and peptides from selected seagrasses in Palk Bay region of Tamil Nadu in India. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 295. [CrossRef]
- Olacia, E., Pisello, A. L., Chiodo, V., Maisano, S., Frazzica, A., & Cabeza, L. F. (2020). Sustainable adobe bricks with seagrass fibres. Mechanical and thermal properties characterization. Construction and Building Materials, 239. [CrossRef]
- Palacio-Herrera, F. M., De la Rosa, J., Sierra-Marquez, L., & Olivero-Verbel, J. (2025). Ecological risks of trace elements in sediments and Thalassia testudinum from Cartagena Bay. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 219. [CrossRef]
- Lee, R. A., & Lavoie, J.-M. (2013). From first- to third-generation biofuels: Challenges of producing a commodity from a biomass of increasing complexity. Animal Frontiers, 3(2), 6–11. [CrossRef]
- Moncada, J., Tamayo, J. A., & Cardona, C. A. (2014). Integrating first, second, and third generation biorefineries: Incorporating microalgae into the sugarcane biorefinery. Chemical Engineering Science, 118, 126–140. [CrossRef]
- Saravanan, A., Senthil Kumar, P., Badawi, M., Mohanakrishna, G., & Aminabhavi, T. M. (2023). Valorisation of micro-algae biomass for the development of green biorefinery: Perspectives on techno-economic analysis and the way towards sustainability. Chemical Engineering Journal, 453, 139754. [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y., Remón, J., Ding, W., Jiang, Z., Pinilla, J. L., Hu, C., & Suelves, I. (2024). An innovative ‘sea-thermal’ synergetic biorefinery for biofuel production: Co-valorization of lignocellulosic and algal biomasses using seawater under hydrothermal conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 462, 142719. [CrossRef]
- Geng, Y., Shaukat, A., Azhar, W., Raza, Q.-U.-A., Tahir, A., Abideen, M. Z. ul, Zia, M. A. B., Bashir, M. A., & Rehim, A. (2025). Microalgal biorefineries: a systematic review of technological trade-offs and innovation pathways. Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, 18(1), 93. [CrossRef]
- Twigg, G., Fedenko, J., Hurst, G., Stanley, M. S., & Hughes, A. D. (2024). A review of the current potential of European brown seaweed for the production of biofuels. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 14(1), 21. [CrossRef]
- Farobie, O., Amrullah, A., Syaftika, N., Bayu, A., Hartulistiyoso, E., Fatriasari, W., & Dani Nandiyanto, A. B. (2024). Valorization of Rejected Macroalgae Kappaphycopsis cottonii for Bio-Oil and Bio-Char Production via Slow Pyrolysis. ACS Omega, 9(14), 16665–16675. [CrossRef]
- Wang, M., Hu, C., Barnes, B. B., Mitchum, G., Lapointe, B., & Montoya, J. P. (2019). Understanding the Sargassum phenomenon in the Tropical Atlantic Ocean: From satellite monitoring to stranding forecast. Science, 365(6448), 83–87. [CrossRef]
- Ordóñez, J. I., Cortés, S., Maluenda, P., & Soto, I. (2023). Biosorption of Heavy Metals with Algae: Critical Review of Its Application in Real Effluents. Sustainability, 15(6), 5521. [CrossRef]
- van Hees, D. H., Olsen, Y. S., Mattio, L., Ruiz--Montoya, L., Wernberg, T., & Kendrick, G. A. (2019). Cast adrift: Physiology and dispersal of benthic Sargassum spinuligerum in surface rafts. Limnology and Oceanography, 64(2), 526–540. [CrossRef]
- Hu, C., Murch, B., Barnes, B., Wang, M., Maréchal, J.-P., Franks, J., Johnson, D., Lapointe, B., Goodwin, D., Schell, J., & Siuda, A. (2016). Sargassum Watch Warns of Incoming Seaweed. Eos, 97. [CrossRef]
- Fraga, J., & Robledo, D. (2022). Covid-19 and Sargassum blooms: impacts and social issues in a mass tourism destination (Mexican Caribbean). Maritime Studies, 21(2), 159–171. [CrossRef]
- Gavio, B., & Santos-Martinez, A. (2018). Floating Sargassum; in Serranilla Bank, Caribbean Colombia, may jeopardize the race to the ocean of baby sea turtles. Acta Biológica Colombiana, 23(3), 311–313. [CrossRef]
- Coronado-Franco, K. V., Selvaraj, J. J., & Mancera Pineda, J. E. (2018). Algal blooms detection in Colombian Caribbean Sea using MODIS imagery. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 133, 791–798. [CrossRef]
- Medina, Ernesto., Huber, Otto., Nassar, J. M.., & Navarro, Pamela. (2013). Recorriendo el paisaje vegetal de Venezuela. IVIC.
- Honorato-Salazar, J. A., Aburto, J., & Amezcua-Allieri, M. A. (2021). Agave and opuntia species as sustainable feedstocks for bioenergy and byproducts. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 13, Issue 21). [CrossRef]
- Loizzo, M. R., Bruno, M., Balzano, M., Giardinieri, A., Pacetti, D., Frega, N. G., Sicari, V., Leporini, M., & Tundis, R. (2019). Comparative Chemical Composition and Bioactivity of Opuntia ficus-indica Sanguigna and Surfarina Seed Oils Obtained by Traditional and Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Procedures. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 121(1). [CrossRef]
- Timpanaro, G., & Foti, V. T. (2025). Sustainable extraction of bioproducts from cactus pear waste: Economic viability and market opportunities in a green economy. Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 10. [CrossRef]
- Emanuele, L., Dujaković, T., Roselli, G., Campanelli, S., & Bellesi, G. (2023). The Use of a Natural Polysaccharide as a Solidifying Agent and Color-Fixing Agent on Modern Paper and Historical Materials. Organics, 4(2), 265–276. [CrossRef]
- Mannai, F., Elhleli, H., Ammar, M., Passas, R., Elaloui, E., & Moussaoui, Y. (2018). Green process for fibrous networks extraction from Opuntia (Cactaceae): Morphological design, thermal and mechanical studies. Industrial Crops and Products, 126, 347–356. [CrossRef]
- Hernandez, E., Espinosa-Solares, T., Pérez-Cadena, R., Téllez-Jurado, A., & Ramírez-Arpide, F. R. (2024). Sustainable agrobiorefinery system for advanced ethanol production from Opuntia prickly pear cactus nopales. Energy Conversion and Management, 321. [CrossRef]
- Pazmiño Abad, K. G. (2021). OBTENCIÓN DE BIOPLÁSTICO A PARTIR DEL MUCÍLAGO DE CACTUS (Opuntia ficus-indica) PARA USO COMO ENVOLTURAS ALIMENTICIAS [Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo]. https://dspace.espoch.edu.ec:8080/server/api/core/bitstreams/eeb4c72c-9b3f-4a82-9c1b-4f00136282f8/content.
- Villalobos, S., Orlando Vargas, B. ;, & Melo, S. (2007). USO, MANEJO Y CONSERVACIÓN DE “yosú”, Stenocereus griseus (CACTACEAE), EN LA ALTA GUAJIRA COLOMBIANA Usage, Managment and Conservation of “yosú”, Stenocereus griseus (Cactaceae), in the Upper Guajira, Colombia. Acta Biológica Colombiana, 12(1), 99–112. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-548X2007000100008.
- Wang, Z. L., Jiang, T., & Xu, L. (2017). Toward the blue energy dream by triboelectric nanogenerator networks. In Nano Energy (Vol. 39, pp. 9–23). Elsevier Ltd. [CrossRef]
- Arias, F. J., & Heras, S. D. Las. (2020). Ocean salt basins energy harvesting. Applied Ocean Research, 98. [CrossRef]
- Cheng, L., Abraham, J., Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J., Boyer, T., Mann, M. E., Zhu, J., Wang, F., Locarnini, R., Li, Y., Zhang, B., Yu, F., Wan, L., Chen, X., Feng, L., Song, X., Liu, Y., Reseghetti, F., Simoncelli, S., … Li, G. (2023). Another Year of Record Heat for the Oceans. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 40(6), 963–974. [CrossRef]
- Benito-González, I.; López-Rubio, A.; Martínez-Abad, A.; Ballester, A.-R.; Falcó, I.; González-Candelas, L.; Sánchez, G.; Lozano-Sánchez, J.; Borrás-Linares, I.; Segura-Carretero, A.; et al. In-Depth Characterization of Bioactive Extracts from Posidonia oceanica Waste Biomass. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 409. [CrossRef]
- Millán, S., Rivas, N., & Chasqui, L. (2024). First report on the distribution and extension of seagrass meadows in Quitasueño Coral Bank, Southwestern Caribbean. Acta Biológica Colombiana, 29(1), 136–139. [CrossRef]
- García-Bonilla, E., González, P., Pirateque, L., Guerrero-Kommritz, J., Puyana, M., & Acosta, A. (2020). SEA GRASSES, A NEW UNREPORTED HABITAT FOR THE HETEROBRANCH MOLLUSK Umbraculum umbraculum IN THE CARIBBEAN REGION. Marine and Fishery Sciences, 33(1), 129–133. [CrossRef]
- Sierra-Rozo, O., Santos-Martínez, A., & Acero, A. (2012). Prospección ecológica del manglar y praderas marinas como hábitats de cría para peces arrecifales en San Andres Isla, Caribe Insular colombiano. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, 41(Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras). http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/mar/v41n2/v41n2a07.pdf.
- Gustafsson, C., Hovey, R. K., Olsen, Y. S., Statton, J., & Kendrick, G. A. (2025). Functional traits are moderate predictors of above- and below-ground biomass in multispecies seagrass habitats. Functional Ecology, 39(6), 1522–1536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.70058. [CrossRef]
- Cao, L., Yu, I. K. M., Cho, D. W., Wang, D., Tsang, D. C. W., Zhang, S., Ding, S., Wang, L., & Ok, Y. S. (2019). Microwave-assisted low-temperature hydrothermal treatment of red seaweed (Gracilaria lemaneiformis) for production of levulinic acid and algae hydrochar. Bioresource Technology, 273, 251–258. [CrossRef]
- Piedra Castro, L. M., & Ramírez-Vargas, M. A. (2023). Arribo masivo de sargazo (Sargassum natans) a la costa del Caribe Sur de Costa Rica durante el 2022. Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, 52(2), 167–172. [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, C. (2023). Escape from Sargasso Sea: Tremendous Sargassum Blooms Challenge Caribbean and Atlantic Communities. Environmental Health Perspectives, 131(9). [CrossRef]
- Gori, B., Ulian, T., Bernal, H. Y., & Diazgranados, M. (2022). Understanding the diversity and biogeography of Colombian edible plants. Scientific Reports, 12(1). [CrossRef]
- Carbonó Delahoz, E., Barros Barraza, A., & Jiménez Vergara, J. (2013). CACTACEAE DE SANTA MARTA, MAGDALENA, COLOMBIA. Revista Académica Colombiana de Ciencias, 37, 11. http://www.theplantlist.org.
- Amaral, D. T., Bonatelli, I. A. S., Romeiro-Brito, M., Moraes, E. M., & Franco, F. F. (2022). Spatial patterns of evolutionary diversity in Cactaceae show low ecological representation within protected areas. [CrossRef]
- Caceres Duran, L. G., & Castiblanco Molina, L. X. (2020). Evaluación de la Opuntia Ficus Indica (Cactus) como coagulante natural para el tratamiento de agua potable de la empresa Emservilla en el municipio de Ubaté. Universidad de América. https://repository.uamerica.edu.co/server/api/core/bitstreams/1adf534f-5338-4079-a068-b610edfc45b8/content.
- Delgado Marín, J. P. (2020). Estudio de viabilidad tecno-económica de una planta de generación eléctrica a partir de la digestión anaeróbica del cactus nopal en Colombia. Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena. https://repositorio.upct.es/server/api/core/bitstreams/41a718cb-44b3-4a8b-8535-0d7c96e9b33c/content.
- Salazar Sánchez, L. C., Acosta, A., Romero-Tibabuzo, C. C., Guerrero-Kommritz, J., Duerñas, P. R., Borrero-Pérez, G. H., Bocanegra, V., Acero, A., Campos, N. H., Puyana Hegedus, M., Zea, S., & Ruiz-Pino, D. (2021). Fauna Marina: Bahía de Taganga, Caribe Colombiano. 2021. [CrossRef]
- Vargas-Brochero, J., Hurtado-Castillo, S., Altamiranda, J., de Menezes Filho, F. C. M., Beluco, A., & Canales, F. A. (2024). Optimizing Renewable Energy Systems for Water Security: A Comparative Study of Reanalysis Models. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(11). [CrossRef]
- Ishaq, H., & Crawford, C. (2024). Addressing Freshwater Scarcity and Hydrogen Production: Offshore Wind and Reverse Osmosis Synergies. Advanced Sustainable Systems, 8(12). [CrossRef]
- Feria--Díaz, J. J., Correa--Mahecha, F., López--Méndez, M. C., Rodríguez--Miranda, J. P., & Barrera--Rojas, J. (2021). Recent desalination technologies by hybridization and integration with reverse osmosis: A review. In Water (Switzerland) (Vol. 13, Issue 10). MDPI. [CrossRef]
- Cath, T. Y., Hancock, N. T., Lundin, C. D., Hoppe-Jones, C., & Drewes, J. E. (2010). A multi-barrier osmotic dilution process for simultaneous desalination and purification of impaired water. Journal of Membrane Science, 362(1–2), 417–426. [CrossRef]
- Vanegas Chamorro, M. J., Rodríguez, P., & Cárdenas, L. (2017). Estudio del potencial de la radiación solar en La Guajira a partir de registros meteorológicos y modelos atmosféricos. Revista Espacios, 38(45), 21.
- Chamorro, H., Blanco, J., & Rojas, L. (2020). Evaluación de series históricas de radiación solar en la región Caribe colombiana: potencial energético y aplicaciones. Revista Colombiana de Energía, 7(1), 45-59. [CrossRef]
- Romero-Garcia, A., Pérez, D., & González, J. (2021). Caracterización geoespacial de la radiación solar global en el Caribe colombiano: implicaciones para proyectos de energía renovable. Energía y Sociedad, 6(2), 85-98. [CrossRef]
- Carvajal Romo, J. E., Sánchez, A. F., & Cárdenas, J. J. (2019). Evaluación del recurso solar en el Caribe colombiano para aplicaciones fotovoltaicas. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, 28(52), 63-74. [CrossRef]
- Luengo, C.A.G.; Amâncio-Vieira, S.F.; Fidelis, R.; Contani, E.A.d.R. Application of a Multicriteria Decision Model for the Selection of Conversion Pathways for Biofuel Production and Management in a Medium-Sized Municipality in the State of Paraná. Energies 2025, 18, 2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hemavathy, R. V. , Ragini, Y. P., Shruthi, S., Ranjani, S., Subhashini, S., & Thamarai, P. (2025). Biofuel production from marine macroalgae: Pathways, technologies, and sustainable energy solutions. Industrial Crops and Products, 224, 120282. [CrossRef]
- Soleymani, M. , & Rosentrater, K. (2017). Techno-Economic Analysis of Biofuel Production from Macroalgae (Seaweed). Bioengineering, 4(4), 92. [CrossRef]
- Amador-Castro, F. , García-Cayuela, T., Alper, H. S., Rodriguez-Martinez, V., & Carrillo-Nieves, D. (2021). Valorization of pelagic sargassum biomass into sustainable applications: Current trends and challenges. Journal of Environmental Management, 283, 112013. [CrossRef]
- Orozco-González, J. G. , Amador-Castro, F., Gordillo-Sierra, A. R., García-Cayuela, T., Alper, H. S., & Carrillo-Nieves, D. (2022). Opportunities Surrounding the Use of Sargassum Biomass as Precursor of Biogas, Bioethanol, and Biodiesel Production. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8. [CrossRef]
- Salgado-Hernández, E. , Ortiz-Ceballos, Á. I., Alvarado-Lassman, A., Martínez-Hernández, S., Rosas-Mendoza, E. S., Velázquez-Fernández, J. B., & Dorantes-Acosta, A. E. (2023). Energy-saving pretreatments affect pelagic Sargassum composition and DNA metabarcoding reveals the microbial community involved in methane yield. PLOS ONE, 18(8), e0289972. [CrossRef]
- Kositkanawuth, K. , Bhatt, A., Sattler, M., & Dennis, B. (2017). Renewable Energy from Waste: Investigation of Co-pyrolysis between Sargassum Macroalgae and Polystyrene. Energy & Fuels, 31(5), 5088–5096. [CrossRef]
- PROCOLOMBIA. (2025). An Ocean of Opportunities: Colombia Embraces Offshore Wind Energy. https://investincolombia.com.co/en/resources/offshore-wind-energy-colombia.
- Grattan, S. (2025). Big firms abandon wind energy plans in Colombia amid regulatory shifts, social issues and grid gaps | AP News. https://apnews.com/article/colombia-wind-energy-companies-climate-56dd34be39a393a4041e9431bdd45e0b.
- Chae, S., Kim, H., Gi Hong, J., Jang, J., Higa, M., Pishnamazi, M., Choi, J.-Y., Chandula Walgama, R., Bae, C., Kim, I. S., & Park, J.-S. (2023). Clean power generation from salinity gradient using reverse electrodialysis technologies: Recent advances, bottlenecks, and future direction. Chemical Engineering Journal, 452, 139482. [CrossRef]
- Gül, T. F., Akalın, M., Dönmezler, E. N., Bolat, A., Cihanoğlu, A., Güler, E., & Kabay, N. (2024). Review on reverse electrodialysis process-a pioneering technology for energy generation by salinity gradient. Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology, 3. [CrossRef]
- Shetty, B. , Puranam-Rajashekar, S., Aralikatti, G. H., Nagaraj, P., Kumar, L. H., Tengli, P. N., Thakur, M. S., Sridhar, & Krishnappa, M. (2025). Seawater electrolysis: A critical review on fundamentals, recent progress, and future perspectives on sustainable hydrogen generation. Next Energy, 9, 100407. [CrossRef]
- Aminuddin, M. F., Ullah, R., Masdar, M. S., Yunus, R. M., Majlan, E. H., Baharudin, N. A., Daud, N. M. R. N. M., & Husaini, T. (2025). A direct seawater electrolysis (DSWEL) for hydrogen production: A review of system design components and advancements. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 144, 336–358. [CrossRef]
- Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2014). Ley 1715 de 2014, por medio de la cual se regula la integración de las energías renovables no convencionales al sistema energético nacional. Diario Oficial No. 49.150. https://www.upme.gov.co/normatividad/ley1715_2014.pdf.









| Algae species | Main products | Main challenges | References |
| Several species | Biofuels (biodiesel, bioethanol, biogas), bioproducts (pigments, antioxidants, food, cosmetics), nutrient recovery, co-products | It assesses the technological and economic bottlenecks involved in moving from pilot to commercial scale, and how this affects the efficiency of the various subsystems. | [23] |
| Laminaria, Saccharina, Fucus spiralis, Laminaria hyperborea | Bioethanol, biogas, anaerobic digestion, use as feedstock for biomass fuels, including HTL (hydrothermal liquefaction) in some cases. | Discussed that choosing species with high productivity, rapid growth, and environmental tolerance is key; drying, transport, and logistics costs continue to be significant. | [24] |
| Kappaphycopsis cottonii | Biochar and bio-oil | Demonstrates an approach to waste utilisation (industrial processing waste) to obtain value-added products but the challenges are yield, pyrolysis cost, bio-oil stability. | [25] |
| Country/region | Specie | Main application | References |
| Italy | Opuntia ficus-indica (Sanguigna, Surfarina) | Oils (seed), pectins, antioxidants, functional juices | [35,36] |
| Tunisia | Opuntia ficus-indica | Biocomposites, packaging, paper | [38] |
| Mexico | Opuntia, Agave | Biogas, bio-SNG, bioethanol, biodiesel, tequila and mezcal | [34,39] |
| Ecuador | Opuntia ficus-indica | Bioplastics (mucilage) | [40] |
| Raw material | Main technological routes | TRL |
| Seagrass | Composting, adsorbents for water treatment, building materials (panels, bricks), extraction of bioactive proteins and peptides. | TRL 4–7. |
| Sargassum | Anaerobic digestion, HTL, pyrolysis, fractionation for bioproducts (pigments, antioxidants), and biocomposites. | TRL 5–8. |
| Cactus | Enzymatic fermentation for bioethanol, anaerobic digestion, mucilage extraction for bioplastics, pectin, oil and fibre extraction for biocomposites. | TRL 5–8. |
| Seawater and saline resources | Ocean thermal energy conversion, tidal and wave energy, osmotic energy, and reverse osmosis desalination integrated with renewables. | TRL 5–9. |
| Zone | Seagrass area (ha) |
| La Guajira | 56.386,41 |
| Archipelago of Saint Andrew and Providence | 2.002,35 |
| Bolívar | 2.712,72 |
| Caribbean Chocó | 350,26 |
| Córdoba | 18,95 |
| Magdalena | 89,54 |
| Sucre | 3.176,18 |
| Total area | 64.736,41 |
| Zone | Potential seagrass areas (ha) |
| Caribbean Chocó | 46,43 |
| Sucre | 236,92 |
| La Guajira | 81.702,72 |
| Total area | 81.986,06 |
| Scenario | Dry density ρ (kg/m2) | Mass (tonne) | LHV (MJ/kg) | Total energy (GWh) |
| Minimum | 0,20 | 112.773,82 | 15,00 | 469,89 |
| Average | 0,60 | 338.318,46 | 17,50 | 1.644,60 |
| Maximum | 1,00 | 563.864,10 | 20,00 | 3.132,58 |
| Estimate | Fresh biomass (tonne/year) | Dry matter (20%) (tonne) | LHV (MJ/kg) | Theoretical energy (GWh) |
| Minimum | 23.000 | 4.600 | 10 | 12,8 |
| Maximum | 68.000 | 13.600 | 12 | 45,3 |
| Average | 45.500 | 9.100 | 11 | 29,05 |
| Cactus species | Subspecies |
| Acanthocereus | Acanthocereus tetragonus |
| Cereus | Cereus hildmannianus |
| Hylocereus | Hylocereus costaricensis |
| Melocactus | Melocactus curvispinus |
| Nopalea | Nopalea cochenillifera |
| Opuntia | Opuntia caracassana |
| Pereskia | Pereskia bleo |
| Pereskia guamacho | |
| Pilosocereus | Pilosocereus lanuginosus |
| Pseudorhipsalis | Pseudorhipsalis amazonica |
| Rhipsalis | Rhipsalis baccifera |
| Estimate | Dry density ρ (tonne/ha) | Total mass (tonne) | Usable 10% (kg) | LHV (MJ/kg) | Theoretical energy (GWh) |
| Minimum | 2 | 320.000 | 32.000.000 | 14 | 124,40 |
| Average | 6 | 960.000 | 96.000.000 | 16 | 426,70 |
| Maximum | 10 | 1.600.000 | 160.000.000 | 18 | 800,00 |
| Unit | Seagrases | Sargassum | Cacti | Min/Max | |
| Energy Potential | GWh/year | 1.645 | 29 | 427 | 0,00/1.645 |
| TRL | Ordinal | 6 | 7 | 7 | 1/9 |
| Economic feasibility | Ordinal | 3 | 5 | 4 | 1/5 |
| Environmental sustainability | Ordinal | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1/5 |
| Social benefit and local integration | Ordinal | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1/5 |
| Availability and logistic viability | Ordinal | 2 | 5 | 5 | 1/5 |
| Circular bioeconomy potential | Ordinal | 5 | 5 | 4 | 1/5 |
| Resource | Technical aspects | Economic aspects | Socio-environmental aspects | References |
| Macroalgae (growing) | Technologies: open sea or tank cultivation; conversion: fermentation (bioethanol), anaerobic digestion (biogas), pyrolysis/gasification, lipid extraction. Maturity: demo-scale pilots, various R&D routes. Challenges: harvesting, drying, composition variability. | High cultivation/harvesting and processing costs; economics depend on co-products (food, cosmetics) and scale. According to TEAs, viability improves with integration (biorefineries). | Positive: does not compete with agricultural land; risk: local impacts on ecosystems if crops are poorly managed; nutrient management and eutrophication. | [68,69] |
| Sargassum (waste) | Conversions: anaerobic digestion (biogas), bioethanol, compost, pyrolysis/gasification. Maturity: applied studies and pilot projects; pretreatment improves performance. | Economically attractive as low-cost feedstock (waste problem), but coastal logistics and sanitation increase OPEX. Variable-value feedstock model necessary; can be profitable if supply chain is stable. Good candidate for regional plants. | Greater benefit (cleans beaches) but beware of contaminants (metals, pathogens), emissions from decomposition on beaches if not collected. | [70,71,72] |
| Fisheries/aquaculture waste | Classic routes: oil extraction → biodiesel; digestion → biogas; more technically mature. | Feedstock with variable value; can be profitable if supply chain is stable. Good candidate for regional plants. | Risks of contamination if not managed; positive nutrient recovery. | [73] |
| Sun + Wind (coastal and offshore) | Mature technologies: solar photovoltaic, onshore/offshore wind. Offshore: high energy density and high capacity factors. Requirements: grid connection, storage, civil works. | High CAPEX (especially offshore) but levelised energy costs have fallen. Challenges: permits, grid, social acceptance. Projects in Colombia moving forward (energy transition). | Low emissions; local impacts (landscape, marine fauna/birds); social: consultation with indigenous communities crucial. | [74,75] |
| Salinity gradient | Conceptual Reverse electrodialysis and Osmotic energy; ionic membranes and critical coatings; still at pilot/demo scale. | Current costs high due to membranes; good potential in estuaries with continuous flow. Viable if membrane costs are reduced and economies of scale are achieved. | Low emissions; requires brine management and design to avoid impact on estuaries. | [76] |
| Seawater electrolysis/green hydrogen | Rapidly advancing technology: direct seawater electrolysis (DSWEL) and chloride-tolerant electrolysers. Requirements: integration with renewables and/or desalination. Maturity: R&D/pilot; challenges: corrosion, by-products, efficiency. | H₂ costs still high; but costs fall if cheap renewable electricity is available and costly desalination is avoided. Potential for export (H₂ or ammonia) from advantageous coastal areas. | H₂ clean at the end of the chain; risks: management of chlorinated products, brine; positive impacts on decarbonisation if done well. | [77,78,79] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).