Submitted:
18 March 2026
Posted:
19 March 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypothesis Development
2.1. S-O-R Model
2.2. Social Media and Adoption Intention
2.3. Social Media and Experiential Attitude, Instrumental Attitude
2.4. Social Media and Self-Efficacy
2.5. Experiential Attitude, Instrumental Attitude, and Adoption Intention
2.6. Self-Efficacy and Adoption Intention
2.7. Pro-Environmental Self-Identity
2.8. Model Specification for fsQCA
3. Research Method
3.1. Study Context
3.2. Measures and Data Collection
3.3. Method of Analysis
4. Data Analysis
4.1. Demographic Profile
4.2. Descriptive Statistics and Correlations
4.3. Common Method Variance
4.4. Reliability and Validity
4.5. Discriminant Validity Analysis
4.6. Hypothesis Testing
4.7. Fuzzy-Set Quantitative Comparative Analysis.
4.7.1. Selecting and Calibrating Variables
4.7.2. fsQCA Results
4.7.3. Robustness Check
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
6.1. Theoretical Implications
6.2. Practical Implications
6.3. Limitations and Future Research
Appendix A
| Construct | Item | Content | Source |
| Social Media (SM) |
SM1 | I have encountered information about robotaxis shared by individuals within my social media network. | (Tran & Corner, 2016) |
| SM2 | I have read posts or reports recommending robotaxis on social media platforms. | ||
| SM3 | I have come across news or discussions about robotaxis on popular social media platforms or forums. | ||
| Experiential Attitude (EA) |
In the next two weeks, using robotaxis would be: | (Kraft et al., 2005) | |
| EA1 | Bad - Good | ||
| EA2 | Stressful - Relaxed | ||
| EA3 | Unpleasant - Pleasant | ||
| EA4 | Boring - Interesting | ||
| Instrumental Attitude (IA) |
IA1 | Unwise - Wise | |
| IA2 | Harmful - Beneficial | ||
| IA3 | Useless - Useful | ||
| IA4 | Wrong - Right | ||
| Self-efficacy (SE) |
SE1 | I believe I am capable of mastering the skills required to use a robotaxi. | (Dermody et al., 2015) |
| SE2 | I believe I can effectively issue commands to a robotaxi according to system instructions. | ||
| SE3 | I believe I am able to successfully complete a trip using a robotaxi. | ||
| SE4 | Overall, I believe I am capable of using a robotaxi. | ||
| Pro-environmental Self-identity (PESI) |
PESI1 | I consider myself an environmentally friendly consumer. | (Cook et al., 2002; Sparks & Shepherd, 1992) |
| PESI2 | I regard myself as someone who is very concerned about environmental issues. | ||
| PESI3 | I would feel uncomfortable if others considered me to have an environmentally friendly lifestyle. (reverse-coded) | ||
| PESI4 | I would not want my family or friends to think of me as someone who cares about environmental issues. (reverse-coded) | ||
| Adoption Intention (AI) |
AI1 | I predict that I will try to use robotaxis in the future. | (Huang & Ge, 2019) |
| AI2 | I would like to try robotaxis now if I had the opportunity. | ||
| AI3 | I intend to use robotaxis in the future if they become available in my city. | ||
Appendix B
| Outcome: Adoption intention | ||||||
| Model: AI=f (AGE, SM, EA, IA, SE, PESI) | ||||||
| Algorithm: Quine-McCluskey | ||||||
| Frequency cutoff: 5 | ||||||
| Consistency cutoff: 0.927115 | ||||||
| Configurations | Raw Coverage | Unique Coverage | Consistency | |||
| ~AGE*SM*EA*SE | 0.363 | 0.041 | 0.923 | |||
| ~AGE*SM*EA*PESI | 0.366 | 0.044 | 0.903 | |||
| SM*EA*IA*SE*PESI | 0.379 | 0.075 | 0.912 | |||
| solution coverage | 0.482 | |||||
| solution consistency | 0.876 | |||||
| Outcome: Adoption intention | ||||||
| Model: AI=f (AGE, SM, EA, IA, SE, PESI) | ||||||
| Algorithm: Quine-McCluskey | ||||||
| Frequency cutoff: 5 | ||||||
| Consistency cutoff: 0.938422 | ||||||
| Configurations | Raw Coverage | Unique Coverage | Consistency | |||
| ~SM*~EA*~IA | 0.467 | 0.086 | 0.884 | |||
| ~EA*~IA*~SE*~PESI | 0.423 | 0.037 | 0.918 | |||
| ~SM*~EA*~SE*PESI | 0.264 | 0.012 | 0.926 | |||
| ~AGE*~EA*~SE*~PESI | 0.326 | 0.011 | 0.918 | |||
| solution coverage | 0.572 | |||||
| solution consistency | 0.868 | |||||
References
- Abang Othman, D. N., Abdul Gani, A., & Ahmad, N. F. (2017). Social media information and hotel selection: Integration of TAM and IAM models. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality & Culinary Arts (JTHCA), 9(2), 113-124. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/20653.
- Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. (1992). Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Leisure Choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24, 207-224. [CrossRef]
- Alqahtani, T. (2025). Recent Trends in the Public Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles: A Review. Vehicles, 7(2), 45. [CrossRef]
- Ani, A., Zhanwen, L., Xing, F., Oroni, C. Z., & Ndunguru, D. D. (2025). Beyond perception: examining the moderating role of barriers in autonomous vehicle adoption. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 34, 101685. [CrossRef]
- Aref, M. M. (2024). Unveiling the complexity of social commerce continuance intention: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, 3(3), 275-294. [CrossRef]
- Babbie, R. (2020). The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=lFvjDwAAQBAJ.
- Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: A Comment. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 375-381. [CrossRef]
- Balaji, M. S., Behl, A., Jain, K., Baabdullah, A. M., Giannakis, M., Shankar, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Effectiveness of B2B social media marketing: The effect of message source and message content on social media engagement. Industrial Marketing Management, 113, 243-257. [CrossRef]
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Worth Publishers. https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=eJ-PN9g_o-EC.
- Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(Volume 52, 2001), 1-26. [CrossRef]
- Barbarossa, C., Beckmann, S. C., De Pelsmacker, P., Moons, I., & Gwozdz, W. (2015). A self-identity based model of electric car adoption intention: A cross-cultural comparative study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 149-160. [CrossRef]
- Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191. https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/fulltext/2000/12150/guidelines_for_the_process_of_cross_cultural.14.aspx.
- Beynon, M. J., Jones, P., & Pickernell, D. (2016). Country-based comparison analysis using fsQCA investigating entrepreneurial attitudes and activity. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1271-1276. [CrossRef]
- Bigne, E., Chatzipanagiotou, K., & Ruiz, C. (2020). Pictorial content, sequence of conflicting online reviews and consumer decision-making: The stimulus-organism-response model revisited. Journal of Business Research, 115, 403-416. [CrossRef]
- Bitner, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees. Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 57-71. [CrossRef]
- Borowski, E., Chen, Y., & Mahmassani, H. (2020). Social media effects on sustainable mobility opinion diffusion: Model framework and implications for behavior change. Travel Behaviour and Society, 19, 170-183. [CrossRef]
- Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. Methodology, 389-444.
- Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity Theory. Oxford University Press. [CrossRef]
- Carfora, V., Buscicchio, G., & Catellani, P. (2024). Proenvironmental self identity as a moderator of psychosocial predictors in the purchase of sustainable clothing. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 23968. [CrossRef]
- Chaihanchanchai, P., & Anantachart, S. (2023). Encouraging green product purchase: Green value and environmental knowledge as moderators of attitude and behavior relationship. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 289-303. [CrossRef]
- Chang, A., Jeng, V., Delaney, M., & Keung, R. (2025). Global Technology: China’s Robotaxi market - the road to commercialization. https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/goldman-sachs-research/chinas-robotaxi-market.
- Chaudhuri, N., Gupta, G., & Lim, W. M. (2026). A stimulus-organism-response eye-tracking survey of how background-foreground images drive image appeal, product perception, and willingness to pay in e-commerce. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 88, 104508. [CrossRef]
- Chen, J., Li, M., & Xie, C. (2021). Transportation connectivity strategies and regional tourism economy - empirical analysis of 153 cities in China. Tourism Review, 77(1), 113-128. [CrossRef]
- Chen, L., Huang, J., Jing, P., Wang, B., Yu, X., Zha, Y., & Jiang, C. (2023). Changing or unchanging Chinese attitudes toward ride-hailing? A social media analytics perspective from 2018 to 2021. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 178, 103881. [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y., Mao, Z., & Qiu, J. L. (2018). Super-sticky WeChat and Chinese Society. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=jONiDwAAQBAJ.
- Cheung, C. M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461-470. [CrossRef]
- Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015). Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31(10), 692-702. [CrossRef]
- Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (2003). Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature. The MIT Press. [CrossRef]
- Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995a). Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118-143. [CrossRef]
- Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995b). Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. [CrossRef]
- Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1429-1464. [CrossRef]
- Cook, A. J., Kerr, G. N., & Moore, K. (2002). Attitudes and intentions towards purchasing GM food. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(5), 557-572. [CrossRef]
- Cui, X., Lai, V. S., & Lowry, P. B. (2016). How do bidders’ organism reactions mediate auction stimuli and bidder loyalty in online auctions? The case of Taobao in China. Information & Management, 53(5), 609-624. [CrossRef]
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. [CrossRef]
- Dermody, J., Hanmer-Lloyd, S., Koenig-Lewis, N., & Zhao, A. L. (2015). Advancing sustainable consumption in the UK and China: the mediating effect of pro-environmental self-identity. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(13-14), 1472-1502. [CrossRef]
- Dermody, J., Koenig-Lewis, N., Zhao, A. L., & Hanmer-Lloyd, S. (2018). Appraising the influence of pro-environmental self-identity on sustainable consumption buying and curtailment in emerging markets: Evidence from China and Poland. Journal of Business Research, 86, 333-343. [CrossRef]
- Diwanji, V. S. (2023). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis in consumer research: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(6), 2767-2789. [CrossRef]
- Dogra, N., Adil, M., Sadiq, M., Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2023). Unraveling customer repurchase intention in OFDL context: An investigation using a hybrid technique of SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 72, 103281. [CrossRef]
- Du, H., Zhu, G., & Zheng, J. (2021). Why travelers trust and accept self-driving cars: An empirical study. Travel Behaviour and Society, 22, 1-9. [CrossRef]
- Du, R., Du, H., & Wu, J. (2022, 12-14 Aug. 2022). Media and Trust Influence Consumers’ Acceptance of Self-driving Cars. 2022 10th International Conference on Traffic and Logistic Engineering (ICTLE),.
- Dul, J. (2015). Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA): Logic and Methodology of “Necessary but Not Sufficient” Causality. Organizational Research Methods, 19(1), 10-52. [CrossRef]
- Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168. [CrossRef]
- Eastman, B., Collins, S., Jones, R., Martin, J., Blumenthal, M. S., & Stanley, K. D. (2023). A comparative look at various countries’ legal regimes governing automated vehicles. JL & Mobility, 1.
- Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167-181. [CrossRef]
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology press. [CrossRef]
- Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180-1198. [CrossRef]
- Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393-420. [CrossRef]
- Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39-66. [CrossRef]
- Frank, D.-A., Chrysochou, P., & Mitkidis, P. (2023). The paradox of technology: Negativity bias in consumer adoption of innovative technologies. Psychology & Marketing, 40(3), 554-566. [CrossRef]
- Fu, H., Xu, M., Wu, Y., & Wang, W. (2024). What facilitates frugal innovation? – A configurational study on the antecedent conditions using fsQCA. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(3), 100522. [CrossRef]
- Gatersleben, B., Murtagh, N., & Abrahamse, W. (2014). Values, identity and pro-environmental behaviour. Contemporary Social Science, 9(4), 374-392. [CrossRef]
- Ghasri, M., & Vij, A. (2021). The potential impact of media commentary and social influence on consumer preferences for driverless cars. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 127, 103132. [CrossRef]
- Govorova, A. V. (2023). History and Paradoxes of the Chinese Car Market: Eastern Strategies and the Asian Regulator. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 34(1), 150-158. [CrossRef]
- Greenblatt, J. B., & Saxena, S. (2015). Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles. Nature Climate Change, 5(9), 860-863. [CrossRef]
- Greifenstein, M., Nordhoff, S., Wang, X., & Atluri, B. (2026). Riding into the future: What drives the use of robotaxis in San Francisco? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 203, 104763. [CrossRef]
- Hair, J., Anderson, R., Babin, B., & Black, W. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis : Pearson New International Edition. Pearson Deutschland. https://elibrary.pearson.de/book/99.150005/9781292035116.
- Hair, J., Page, M., & Brunsveld, N. (2019). Essentials of Business Research Methods. [CrossRef]
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 616-632. [CrossRef]
- Hasan, M., & Sohail, M. S. (2020). The Influence of Social Media Marketing on Consumers’ Purchase Decision: Investigating the Effects of Local and Nonlocal Brands. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 33, 350–367. [CrossRef]
- Hassenzahl, M. (2004). The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products. Human–Computer Interaction, 19(4), 319-349. [CrossRef]
- Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional Contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 96-100. [CrossRef]
- Hayes, A. F., Montoya, A. K., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: PROCESS versus structural equation modeling. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 25(1), 76-81. [CrossRef]
- He, L., Yin, T., & Zheng, K. (2022). They May Not Work! An evaluation of eleven sentiment analysis tools on seven social media datasets. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 132, 104142. [CrossRef]
- Heineke, K., Kellner, M., Smith, A.-S., & Rebmann, M. (2024). Are consumers ready for remote driving? https://www.mckinsey.com/features/mckinsey-center-for-future-mobility/mckinsey-on-urban-mobility/are-consumers-ready-for-remote-driving.
- Hiustra, M., Pangaribuan, C., & Wismiarsi, T. (2024). The Dynamic Interactions of Social Media Use, Self-Efficacy, Academic Resilience, and Learning Engagement in College Students. Digismantech (Jurnal Program Studi Bisnis Digital), 4, 1-16. [CrossRef]
- Ho, J., Plewa, C., & Lu, V. N. (2016). Examining strategic orientation complementarity using multiple regression analysis and fuzzy set QCA. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2199-2205. [CrossRef]
- Hornbæk, K., & Hertzum, M. (2017). Technology Acceptance and User Experience: A Review of the Experiential Component in HCI. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 24(5), Article 33. [CrossRef]
- Huang, T. (2023). Psychological factors affecting potential users’ intention to use autonomous vehicles. PLOS ONE, 18(3), e0282915. [CrossRef]
- Huang, X., & Ge, J. (2019). Electric vehicle development in Beijing: An analysis of consumer purchase intention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 216, 361-372. [CrossRef]
- Huertas-Valdivia, I., Llorens-Montes, F. J., & Ruiz-Moreno, A. (2018). Achieving engagement among hospitality employees: a serial mediation model. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1), 217-241. [CrossRef]
- Hussain, Z., Simonovic, B., Stupple, E. J. N., & Austin, M. (2019). Using Eye Tracking to Explore Facebook Use and Associations with Facebook Addiction, Mental Well-being, and Personality. Behavioral Sciences, 9(2), 19. [CrossRef]
- International Transport Forum. (2023). Accessibility in the Seoul Metropolitan Area: Does Transport Serve All Equally? (International Transport Forum Policy Papers, Issue. O. Publishing.
- Ismagilova, E., Slade, E., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101736. [CrossRef]
- Jacoby, J. (2002). Stimulus-Organism-Response Reconsidered: An Evolutionary Step in Modeling (Consumer) Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(1), 51-57. [CrossRef]
- Jiang, H., Zeng, J., & Cai, J. (2026). From emotional arousal to diminished cognitive control: How configurations of beauty streamer characteristics shape consumer impulse buying. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 90, 104713. [CrossRef]
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. macmillan.
- Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (2015). The social psychology of organizations. In Organizational behavior 2 (pp. 152-168). Routledge.
- Kenesei, Z., Ásványi, K., Kökény, L., Jászberényi, M., Miskolczi, M., Gyulavári, T., & Syahrivar, J. (2022). Trust and perceived risk: How different manifestations affect the adoption of autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 164, 379-393. [CrossRef]
- Kraft, P., Rise, J., Sutton, S., & Røysamb, E. (2005). Perceived difficulty in the theory of planned behaviour: perceived behavioural control or affective attitude? Br J Soc Psychol, 44(Pt 3), 479-496. [CrossRef]
- Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788-8790. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A., & Pandey, M. (2023). Social Media and Impact of Altruistic Motivation, Egoistic Motivation, Subjective Norms, and EWOM toward Green Consumption Behavior: An Empirical Investigation. Sustainability, 15(5), 4222. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, J., Huang, J., & Kumari, J. (2026). Drivers of green consumer behavior in hotels: The roles of green attitudes and environmental gardening identity (PLS-SEM and fsQCA evidence). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 88, 104476. [CrossRef]
- La Barbera, F., & Ajzen, I. (2024). Instrumental vs. experiential attitudes in the theory of planned behaviour: two studies on intention to perform a recommended amount of physical activity. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 22(3), 632-644. [CrossRef]
- Laato, S., Islam, A. K. M. N., Farooq, A., & Dhir, A. (2020). Unusual purchasing behavior during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: The stimulus-organism-response approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102224. [CrossRef]
- Lavuri, R., Roubaud, D., & Grebinevych, O. (2023). Sustainable consumption behaviour: Mediating role of pro-environment self-identity, attitude, and moderation role of environmental protection emotion. Journal of Environmental Management, 347, 119106. [CrossRef]
- Lawton, R., Conner, M., & Parker, D. (2007). Beyond cognition: predicting health risk behaviors from instrumental and affective beliefs. Health Psychol, 26(3), 259-267. [CrossRef]
- Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. Am Psychol, 46(8), 819-834. [CrossRef]
- Le, T.-M. H., & Ngoc, B. M. (2024). Consumption-related social media peer communication and online shopping intention among Gen Z consumers: A moderated-serial mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 153, 108100. [CrossRef]
- Lee, C. K. H., Tse, Y. K., Leung, E. K. H., & Wang, Y. (2024). Causal recipes of customer loyalty in a sharing economy: Integrating social media analytics and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 181, 114747. [CrossRef]
- Lee, J., Baig, F., & Li, X. (2022). Media Influence, Trust, and the Public Adoption of Automated Vehicles. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 14(6), 174-187. [CrossRef]
- Li, D., Huang, Y., & Qian, L. (2022). Potential adoption of robotaxi service: The roles of perceived benefits to multiple stakeholders and environmental awareness. Transport Policy, 126, 120-135. [CrossRef]
- Li, W. (2024). Analyzing the Impact of Information Features on User Continuance Intent in Recommendation Systems. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 20(1), 1-36. [CrossRef]
- Liu, D., Liu, T., Son, S., & Wang, M. (2026). When driving becomes enjoyable: the role of hedonic motivation and interaction quality in the adoption of autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 118, 103507. [CrossRef]
- Liu, M., Wu, J., Zhu, C., & Hu, K. (2022). Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Robo-Taxi Services in China: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model Analysis. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022(1), 8461212. [CrossRef]
- Loh, X. K., Lee, V. H., Loh, X. M., Tan, G. W., Ooi, K. B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). The Dark Side of Mobile Learning via Social Media: How Bad Can It Get? Inf Syst Front, 24(6), 1887-1904. [CrossRef]
- Luo, C., He, M., & Xing, C. (2024). Public Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles in China. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(2), 315-326. [CrossRef]
- Manosuthi, N., Meeprom, S., & Leruksa, C. (2024). Exploring multifaceted pathways: understanding behavioral formation in green tourism selection through fsQCA. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 41(4), 640-658. [CrossRef]
- Maton, K., Le Blanc, P., van de Calseyde, P., & Ulfert, A.-S. (2025). Instrumental and experiential attitudes toward (A.I.) augmented decision-making at work. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 5, 100188. [CrossRef]
- Mayer, A.-T., Ohme, J., Maslowska, E., & Segijn, C. M. (2024). Headlines, Pictures, Likes: Attention to Social Media Newsfeed Post Elements on Smartphones and in Public. Social Media + Society, 10(2), 20563051241245666. [CrossRef]
- McEachan, R., Taylor, N., Harrison, R., Lawton, R., Gardner, P., & Conner, M. (2016). Meta-Analysis of the Reasoned Action Approach (RAA) to Understanding Health Behaviors. Ann Behav Med, 50(4), 592-612. [CrossRef]
- Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). The basic emotional impact of environments. Percept Mot Skills, 38(1), 283-301. [CrossRef]
- Merlin, D. L. A. (2017). Comparing Automated Shared Taxis and Conventional Bus Transit for a Small City. Journal of Public Transportation, 20(2), 19-39. [CrossRef]
- Mirbabaie, M., Stieglitz, S., & Marx, J. (2023). Negative Word of Mouth On Social Media: A Case Study of Deutsche Bahn’s Accountability Management. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 75(1), 99-117. [CrossRef]
- Mustafa, S., Wang, Q., Jamil, K., & Acharya, S. (2026). Equifinal roads to a driverless future: A techno-institutional mixed-methods fsQCA study of demographic-specific archetypes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 226, 124569. [CrossRef]
- Narayanan, S., Chaniotakis, E., & Antoniou, C. (2020). Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 111, 255-293. [CrossRef]
- Nekmahmud, M., Naz, F., Ramkissoon, H., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2022). Transforming consumers’ intention to purchase green products: Role of social media. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, 122067. [CrossRef]
- Ng, P. M. L., Chan, J. K. Y., Lit, K. K., Cheung, C. T. Y., Lau, M. M., Wan, C., & Choy, E. T. K. (2025). The impact of social media exposure and online peer networks on green purchase behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 165, 108517. [CrossRef]
- Nordhoff, S., Louw, T., Innamaa, S., Lehtonen, E., Beuster, A., Torrao, G., Bjorvatn, A., Kessel, T., Malin, F., Happee, R., & Merat, N. (2020). Using the UTAUT2 model to explain public acceptance of conditionally automated (L3) cars: A questionnaire study among 9,118 car drivers from eight European countries. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 74, 280-297. [CrossRef]
- Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2010). Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 555-566. [CrossRef]
- Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310. [CrossRef]
- Pappas, N. (2017). The complexity of purchasing intentions in peer-to-peer accommodation. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(9), 2302-2321. [CrossRef]
- Park, J., Tsou, M.-H., Nara, A., Cassels, S., & Dodge, S. (2024). Developing a social sensing index for monitoring place-oriented mental health issues using social media (twitter) data. Urban Informatics, 3(1), 2. [CrossRef]
- Perfecto, H., & O’Donnell, M. (2025). The Use and Usefulness of Attention Checks in Behavioral Research. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org10.1093/jcr/ucaf058.
- Pham, H. C., Duong, C. D., & Nguyen, G. K. H. (2024). What drives tourists’ continuance intention to use ChatGPT for travel services? A stimulus-organism-response perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78, 103758. [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol, 88(5), 879-903. [CrossRef]
- Qasim, H., Yan, L., Guo, R., Saeed, A., & Ashraf, B. N. (2019). The Defining Role of Environmental Self-Identity among Consumption Values and Behavioral Intention to Consume Organic Food. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7), 1106. [CrossRef]
- Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Bibliovault OAI Repository, the University of Chicago Press. [CrossRef]
- Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political analysis, 14(3), 291-310. [CrossRef]
- Ragin, C. C. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques, 87-122.
- Rather, R. A., & Hollebeek, L. D. (2021). Customers’ service-related engagement, experience, and behavioral intent: Moderating role of age. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60, 102453. [CrossRef]
- Regorz, A. (2021). PROCESS Model 14 moderated mediation. In: Regorz Statistik. http://www. regorz-statistik. de/en/process_model_14 ….
- Rogers, E. M., Medina, U. E., Rivera, M. A., & Wiley, C. J. (2005). Complex adaptive systems and the diffusion of innovations. The innovation journal: the public sector innovation journal, 10(3), 1-26.
- Santos, S., & Gonçalves, H. M. (2019). Multichannel consumer behaviors in the mobile environment: Using fsQCA and discriminant analysis to understand webrooming motivations. Journal of Business Research, 101, 757-766. [CrossRef]
- Sharma, M., Joshi, S., Luthra, S., & Kumar, A. (2024). Impact of Digital Assistant Attributes on Millennials’ Purchasing Intentions: A Multi-Group Analysis using PLS-SEM, Artificial Neural Network and fsQCA. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(3), 943-966. [CrossRef]
- Skaaning, S.-E. (2011). Assessing the Robustness of Crisp-set and Fuzzy-set QCA Results. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(2), 391-408. [CrossRef]
- Slovic, P. (2004). What’s fear got to do with it-It’s affect we need to worry about. Mo. L. Rev., 69, 971.
- Sojump. (2026). Sample Service. Sojump.com. https://www.wjx.cn/sample/service.aspx.
- Spais, G., Jain, V., & Ford, J. (2024). Social media influencers and immersive technologies for dynamic consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(5), 2390-2394. [CrossRef]
- Sparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-Identity and the Theory of Planned Behavior: Assesing the Role of Identification with “Green Consumerism”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(4), 388-399. [CrossRef]
- Sperling, D. (2018). Three Revolutions: Steering Automated, Shared, and Electric Vehicles to a Better Future. Island Press. https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=f0NEDwAAQBAJ.
- Sukhov, A., Friman, M., & Olsson, L. E. (2023). Unlocking potential: An integrated approach using PLS-SEM, NCA, and fsQCA for informed decision making. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74, 103424. [CrossRef]
- Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning Initiative Cambridge, MA.
- Syahrivar, J., Gyulavári, T., Jászberényi, M., Ásványi, K., Kökény, L., & Chairy, C. (2021). Surrendering personal control to automation: Appalling or appealing? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 80, 90-103. [CrossRef]
- Thøgersen, J., & Zhang, T. (2025). Spillover from general and specific pro-environmental behavior to climate-friendly choices and policy Acceptance: The mediating role of psychological engagement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 106, 102718. [CrossRef]
- Tombs, A., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2003). Social-Servicescape Conceptual Model. Marketing Theory, 3(4), 447-475. [CrossRef]
- Tran, H. T. T., & Corner, J. (2016). The impact of communication channels on mobile banking adoption. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 34(1), 78-109. [CrossRef]
- Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Jing Yi, T., Hanifah, H., Nikbin, D., & Shojaei, S. A. (2025). Examining autonomous vehicle adoption: A media-based perception and adoption model. Travel Behaviour and Society, 40, 101041. [CrossRef]
- Valensia, V., & Nugroho, A. (2019). Information overload, fear of missing out, and privacy concern as factors influencing social networking services fatigue and discontinuous intention: Evidence from indonesian instagram users. the 34th International Business Information Management Association Conference Madrid, Spanyol,.
- van der Heijden, H. (2004). User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems1. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28(4), 695-704. [CrossRef]
- van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013). The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 55-63. [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V., & Thong, J. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the association for Information Systems.
- Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012a). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012b). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology1. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. [CrossRef]
- Vis, B. (2012). The Comparative Advantages of fsQCA and Regression Analysis for Moderately Large-N Analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(1), 168-198. [CrossRef]
- Voorveld, H. A. M., van Noort, G., Muntinga, D. G., & Bronner, F. (2018). Engagement with Social Media and Social Media Advertising: The Differentiating Role of Platform Type. Journal of Advertising, 47(1), 38-54. [CrossRef]
- Vu, D., Le, T., Nguyen, T., & Nguyen, T. (2025). The Impact Of Social Media Marketing On Cognitive And Affective Destination Image Toward Intention To Visit Cultural Destinations In Vietnam. In (pp. 300-315). [CrossRef]
- Wang, K., Li, G., Chen, J., Long, Y., Chen, T., Chen, L., & Xia, Q. (2020). The adaptability and challenges of autonomous vehicles to pedestrians in urban China. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 145, 105692. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q., & Yao, N. (2025). Understanding the impact of technology usage at work on academics’ psychological well-being: a perspective of technostress. BMC Psychol, 13(1), 130. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z., & Li, S. (2024). Competition between autonomous and traditional ride-hailing platforms: Market equilibrium and technology transfer. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 165, 104728. [CrossRef]
- Watts, H., Francis-Smythe, J., & Bell, R. (2026). A stimulus-organism-response approach to predicting membership retention in fitness clubs. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 88, 104461. [CrossRef]
- Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113-117. [CrossRef]
- Wei, W., Sun, J., Miao, W., Chen, T., Sun, H., Lin, S., & Gu, C. (2024). Using the Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to explore how to increase users’ intention to take a robotaxi. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 746. [CrossRef]
- White, E. (2025). China vies for lead in the race to self-driving vehicles. https://www.ft.com/content/41bac535-9237-444b-ba56-a9cf38c11b3f.
- Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305-314. [CrossRef]
- Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85-102. [CrossRef]
- Woodside, A. G. (2014). Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2495-2503. [CrossRef]
- Wu, J., & Kim, S.-T. (2025). An integrated SOR and SCT model approach to exploring chinese public perception of autonomous vehicles. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 21727. [CrossRef]
- Wu, J., Liao, H., Wang, J.-W., & Chen, T. (2019). The role of environmental concern in the public acceptance of autonomous electric vehicles: A survey from China. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, 37-46. [CrossRef]
- Xu, J., & Cheng, L. (2019). Research on the residents’ support for intercity railway in rural tourism destinations: multiple regression analysis and fsQCA findings.
- Yang, H.-L., & Lin, R.-X. (2017). Determinants of the intention to continue use of SoLoMo services: Consumption values and the moderating effects of overloads. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 583-595. [CrossRef]
- Yao, X., Liu, J., Wang, X., Xiao, Y., & Qi, G. (2025). Transition toward driverless robotaxi: Role of social anxiety, perceived safety, and travel habit. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 109, 1402-1418. [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.-P., Tan, G. W.-H., & Ooi, K.-B. (2025). What shapes mobile fintech consumers’ post-adoption experience? A multi-analytical PLS-ANN-fsQCA perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 217, 124162. [CrossRef]
- Yuen, K. F., Chua, G., Wang, X., Ma, F., & Li, K. X. (2020). Understanding Public Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 4419. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, K., & Cheng, X. (2025). Determinants of consumers’ intentions to use smart home devices from the perspective of perceived value: A mixed SEM, NCA, and fsQCA study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 87, 104399. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, P., Aikman, S. N., & Sun, H. (2008). Two Types of Attitudes in ICT Acceptance and Use. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(7), 628-648. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W., Wang, S., Wan, L., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, D. (2022). Information perspective for understanding consumers’ perceptions of electric vehicles and adoption intentions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 102, 103157. [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H. (2025). Social Media Statistics for China [Updated 2025]. https://www.meltwater.com/en/blog/social-media-statistics-china.
- Zhao, X., Zhu, Z., Shan, M., Cao, R., & Chen, H. (2024). “Informers” or “entertainers”: The effect of social media influencers on consumers’ green consumption. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 77, 103647. [CrossRef]
- Zheng, L., Chen, Y., Yan, J., Zhang, W., & Zheng, X. (2025). Public Attitudes and Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Robotaxis in China: A Machine Learning-Based Analysis. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-24. [CrossRef]
- Zhou, M., & Yi, H. (2025). Interdisciplinary analysis of Robo-taxi adoption: Integrating economic, sociological, and psychological perspectives within an extended UTAUT2 framework. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 60, 101352. [CrossRef]
- Zhu, G., Chen, Y., & Zheng, J. (2020). Modelling the acceptance of fully autonomous vehicles: A media-based perception and adoption model. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 73, 80-91. [CrossRef]
- Zhu, G., Chen, Y., & Zheng, J. (2024). Partially autonomous vehicles (PAVs) vs. fully autonomous vehicles (FAVs): A comparative study with adoption models. Technology in Society, 79, 102698. [CrossRef]
- Zhu, G., Zheng, J., Du, H., & Hou, J. (2025). Insights into Autonomous Vehicles Aversion: Unveiling the Ripple Effect of Negative Media on Perceived Risk, Anxiety, and Negative WOM. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(14), 8684-8701. [CrossRef]
| Demographics | Items | Frequency | Percentage% |
| Gender | Male | 428 | 52.4 |
| Female | 389 | 47.6 | |
| Age | Under25 | 125 | 15.3 |
| 26–35 | 117 | 14.3 | |
| 36–45 | 209 | 25.6 | |
| 46–55 | 269 | 32.9 | |
| Over 55 | 97 | 11.9 | |
| Education | High School or Below | 52 | 6.4 |
| Associate Degree | 258 | 31.6 | |
| Bachelor’s Degree | 468 | 57.3 | |
| Master’s Degree or Above | 39 | 4.8 | |
| Occupation | Government employee | 36 | 4.4 |
| Private employee | 287 | 35.1 | |
| Own business | 261 | 31.9 | |
| Others | 125 | 15.3 | |
| IncC status (monthly) | Below CNY ¥5000 | 144 | 17.6 |
| CNY ¥5001-CNY ¥8000 | 265 | 32.4 | |
| CNY ¥8001-CNY ¥11000 | 189 | 23.1 | |
| CNY ¥11001-CNY ¥14000 | 147 | 18 | |
| Above CNY ¥14001 | 72 | 8.8 | |
| Social media platforms (Multiple Choices) |
Douyin | 693 | 84.8 |
| Sina Weibo | 97 | 11.9 | |
| Bilibili | 205 | 25.1 | |
| Xiaohongshu | 582 | 71.2 | |
| Others | 59 | 7.2 |
| Construct | Mean | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 Gender | 1.480 | 0.500 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 2 Age | 3.120 | 1.244 | 0.016 | 1 | |||||||||
| 3 Education | 2.600 | 0.680 | 0.024 | −0.128** | 1 | ||||||||
| 4 Occupation | 2.980 | 1.100 | 0.039 | −0.347** | 0.119** | 1 | |||||||
| 5 Income status (CNY) | 2.680 | 1.209 | −0.001 | 0.048 | −0.008 | −0.015 | 1 | ||||||
| 6 SM | 3.255 | 1.014 | 0.044 | 0.006 | −0.025 | −0.034 | 0.059 | 1 | |||||
| 7 EA | 3.053 | 1.051 | 0.016 | −0.005 | −0.055 | −0.008 | −0.007 | 0.289** | 1 | ||||
| 8 IA | 3.241 | 1.035 | 0.061 | −0.006 | −0.069* | −0.052 | −0.003 | 0.280** | 0.512** | 1 | |||
| 9 SE | 3.219 | 1.048 | 0.054 | 0.003 | −0.026 | −0.043 | 0.021 | 0.050 | 0.296** | 0.362** | 1 | ||
| 10 PESI | 3.287 | 1.029 | 0.064 | −0.071* | 0.006 | 0.023 | 0.010 | 0.135** | 0.423** | 0.324** | 0.233** | 1 | |
| 11 AI | 3.096 | 1.029 | −0.001 | −0.090* | −0.036 | 0.026 | 0.040 | 0.356** | 0.472** | 0.452** | 0.322** | 0.261** | 1 |
| Model | x²/df | IFI | TLI | CFI | RMSEA | SMRM |
| CLF factor | 1.480 | 0.990 | 0.988 | 0.990 | 0.024 | 0.026 |
| 6 factor | 1.561 | 0.988 | 0.985 | 0.988 | 0.026 | 0.029 |
| 5 factor | 4.569 | 0.920 | 0.920 | 0.920 | 0.066 | 0.061 |
| 4 factor | 8.709 | 0.823 | 0.800 | 0.822 | 0.097 | 0.078 |
| 3 factor | 15.399 | 0.662 | 0.626 | 0.661 | 0.133 | 0.107 |
| 2 factor | 21.332 | 0.516 | 0.471 | 0.515 | 0.158 | 0.126 |
| 1 factor | 22.790 | 0.476 | 0.433 | 0.475 | 0.163 | 0.129 |
| Criteria | Acceptable<5 | >0.8 | >0.8 | >0.8 | <0.08 | <0.08 |
| Ideally <3 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.9 |
| Variables | Items | Loadings | CR | AVE | Cronbach’s alpha |
| SM | SM1 | 0.608 | 0.761 | 0.517 | 0.755 |
| SM2 | 0.779 | ||||
| SM3 | 0.758 | ||||
| EA | EA1 | 0.667 | 0.839 | 0.567 | 0.838 |
| EA2 | 0.787 | ||||
| EA3 | 0.746 | ||||
| EA4 | 0.804 | ||||
| IA | IA1 | 0.872 | 0.876 | 0.642 | 0.871 |
| IA2 | 0.734 | ||||
| IA3 | 0.909 | ||||
| IA4 | 0.666 | ||||
| SE | SE1 | 0.727 | 0.873 | 0.638 | 0.866 |
| SE2 | 0.931 | ||||
| SE3 | 0.858 | ||||
| SE4 | 0.647 | ||||
| PESI | PESI1 | 0.630 | 0.873 | 0.637 | 0.867 |
| PESI2 | 0.891 | ||||
| PESI3 | 0.745 | ||||
| PESI4 | 0.895 | ||||
| AI | AI1 | 0.754 | 0.786 | 0.555 | 0.771 |
| AI2 | 0.602 | ||||
| AI3 | 0.857 |
| Constructs | SM | EA | IA | SE | PESI | AI |
| SM | 0.719 | 0.358 | 0.321 | 0.053 | 0.151 | 0.439 |
| EA | 0.357 | 0.753 | 0.582 | 0.344 | 0.469 | 0.558 |
| IA | 0.319 | 0.580 | 0.801 | 0.412 | 0.335 | 0.506 |
| SE | 0.052 | 0.343 | 0.410 | 0.799 | 0.258 | 0.382 |
| PESI | 0.150 | 0.467 | 0.333 | 0.256 | 0.798 | 0.306 |
| AI | 0.436 | 0.554 | 0.502 | 0.379 | 0.303 | 0.745 |
| Hypothesis | Path | Coefficients | S.E. | t | p | 95% CILL | 95% CIUL | Supported |
| Main effects | ||||||||
| H1 | SM→AI | 0.211 | 0.031 | 6.831 | 0.000 | 0.151 | 0.272 | Yes |
| H2 | SM→EA | 0.303 | 0.035 | 8.670 | 0.000 | 0.235 | 0.372 | Yes |
| H3 | SM→IA | 0.286 | 0.034 | 8.265 | 0.000 | 0.218 | 0.354 | Yes |
| H4 | SM→SE | 0.050 | 0.036 | 1.374 | 0.170 | −0.021 | 0.122 | NO |
| H5 | EA→AI | 0.239 | 0.035 | 6.839 | 0.000 | 0.171 | 0.308 | Yes |
| H6 | IA→AI | 0.199 | 0.035 | 5.713 | 0.000 | 0.131 | 0.267 | Yes |
| H7 | SE→AI | 0.148 | 0.031 | 4.866 | 0.000 | 0.089 | 0.208 | Yes |
| Mediating effects | ||||||||
| H8 | SM→EA→AI | 0.073 | 0.014 | 0.046 | 0.103 | Yes | ||
| H9 | SM→IA→AI | 0.057 | 0.013 | 0.034 | 0.084 | Yes | ||
| H10 | SM→SE→AI | 0.007 | 0.006 | −0.003 | 0.019 | NO | ||
| Moderating effects | ||||||||
| H11a | SM*PESI→AI | 0.008 | 0.031 | 0.267 | 0.790 | −0.052 | 0.069 | NO |
| H11b | EA*PESI→AI | 0.134 | 0.036 | 3.696 | 0.000 | 0.063 | 0.204 | Yes |
| H11c | IA*PESI→AI | −0.027 | 0.034 | −0.782 | 0.435 | −0.093 | 0.040 | NO |
| H11d | SE*PESI→AI | 0.005 | 0.030 | 0.179 | 0.858 | −0.054 | 0.065 | NO |
| Mediator | Clusters | Coefficients | S.E. | 95% CILL | 95% CIUL | Index of moderated mediation | |
| Index | 95% CI | ||||||
| EA | High PESI | 0.114 | 0.022 | 0.074 | 0.160 | 0.041 | [0.018,0.067] |
| Low PESI | 0.031 | 0.016 | 0.000 | 0.064 | |||
| Construct | High AI | Non-high AI | |||
| Consistency | Coverage | Consistency | Coverage | ||
| AGE | 0.658 | 0.579 | 0.700 | 0.669 | |
| ~AGE | 0.624 | 0.657 | 0.560 | 0.640 | |
| SM | 0.730 | 0.684 | 0.553 | 0.563 | |
| ~SM | 0.534 | 0.524 | 0.690 | 0.735 | |
| EA | 0.763 | 0.711 | 0.508 | 0.514 | |
| ~EA | 0.479 | 0.472 | 0.715 | 0.766 | |
| IA | 0.777 | 0.720 | 0.537 | 0.540 | |
| ~IA | 0.503 | 0.500 | 0.721 | 0.778 | |
| SE | 0.734 | 0.686 | 0.557 | 0.565 | |
| ~SE | 0.535 | 0.527 | 0.690 | 0.738 | |
| PESI | 0.693 | 0.669 | 0.541 | 0.568 | |
| ~PESI | 0.553 | 0.526 | 0.685 | 0.708 | |
| Factor | Solutions | |||||||
| High AI | Not-high AI | |||||||
| S1a | S1b | S2 | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | ||
| AGE | ⊗ | ⊗ | ⊗ | |||||
| SM | ● | ● | ● | ⊗ | ⊗ | |||
| EA | ● | ● | ● | ⊗ | ⊗ | ⊗ | ⊗ | |
| IA | ● | ⊗ | ⊗ | |||||
| SE | ● | ● | ⊗ | ⊗ | ⊗ | |||
| PESI | ● | ● | ⊗ | ● | ⊗ | |||
| Raw coverage | 0.363 | 0.366 | 0.379 | 0.467 | 0.423 | 0.264 | 0.326 | |
| Unique coverage | 0.041 | 0.044 | 0.075 | 0.086 | 0.036 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |
| Consistency | 0.923 | 0.903 | 0.912 | 0.884 | 0.918 | 0.925 | 0.918 | |
| Solution coverage | 0.482 | 0.572 | ||||||
| Solution consistency | 0.876 | 0.868 | ||||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.