1. Introduction
Supernumerary teeth (ST), defined as a developmental anomaly representing an excess of the normal dental arch count—32 in the permanent and 20 in the primary dentition—constitute a complex clinical condition that can significantly affect both the aesthetic and functional integrity of the dento-maxillary system [
1]. These additional teeth, which display considerable variation in shape, size, position, and eruption pattern, are a subject of ongoing research focusing on their classification, epidemiological distribution, and multifactorial etiopathogenesis [
2,
3].
The presence of supernumerary teeth (
Figure 1) is not a mere morphological curiosity but a potential source of diverse pathological complications [
1,
2,
3,
4].
The most frequently encountered issues include delayed eruption or impaction, displacement, and malformation of adjacent permanent teeth [
4,
5]. In more severe cases, ST may induce root resorption, cystic formations, or ectopic migrations into the nasal cavity or maxillary sinus [
6,
7,
8,
9,
10]. Furthermore, these anomalies can interfere with alveolar bone grafting, orthodontic alignment, or implant placement, and in rare instances, have been associated with neurological disturbances such as neuralgia or paresthesia [
11,
12,
13]. Therefore, early detection and accurate diagnosis are crucial to prevent or mitigate secondary complications [
14,
15,
16,
17].
Etiopathogeny, Epidemiology, and Clinical Relevance
The etiopathogenesis of supernumerary teeth remains incomplete, although most authors agree that their occurrence reflects a developmental disturbance during organogenesis and dental morphogenesis [
2,
18,
19,
20]. Several hypotheses have been proposed to elucidate this complex process. One of the earliest is the tooth bud division theory, which suggests that a single tooth germ divides partially or completely, resulting in two distinct dental structures [
2,
18,
19]. Another explanation, known as the third dentition theory, proposes that supernumerary teeth arise from dental lamina remnants reactivation during a hypothetical third cycle of tooth development, following the primary and permanent dentitions [
2,
20,
21].
A further perspective considers the proliferation of epithelial remnants, wherein residual elements of the dental lamina or Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath, persisting in the jaws after the normal tooth development process, may undergo abnormal proliferation and differentiation under the influence of local or systemic stimuli, giving rise to additional tooth structures [
2,
19].
The dental lamina hyperactivity theory has gained the widest acceptance in contemporary literature. This hypothesis attributes the formation of supernumerary teeth to localized and independent hyperactivity of the dental lamina, which leads to the development of supplementary epithelial buds during embryogenesis [
19,
20,
22,
23]. Such hyperactivity may be triggered by vascular, histochemical, or developing craniofacial region structural environment, affecting the delicate regulatory mechanisms that control tooth initiation and morphogenesis [
21,
22].
Overall, these theories indicate that the genesis of supernumerary teeth is multifactorial, arising from an interplay between genetic susceptibility, local developmental disturbances, and environmental influences that alter the normal morphogenetic potential of the dental lamina [
3,
24].
The increased frequency of ST in the maxillary incisor region (
Figure 2) may be linked to intricate tissue rearrangements and morphogenetic activity in this area [
2,
17,
20,
25]. Nevertheless, no single theory fully accounts for the wide diversity of clinical presentations, suggesting that the etiology of ST is multifactorial, shaped by a complex interplay between genetic predisposition and environmental influences [
3,
24].
Genetic studies have revealed familial clustering of cases and associations with syndromic conditions such as Gardner’s syndrome and cleidocranial dysplasia [
25,
26]. Brook’s unified etiological model [
2,
26] postulates that supernumerary teeth result from genetically determined susceptibility, modulated by environmental and epigenetic factors. This framework reflects the modern understanding of dental developmental anomalies as polygenic and multifactorial disorders rather than isolated occurrences.
Epidemiological Overview
Epidemiological studies estimate the prevalence of supernumerary teeth at 0.1% to 3.8% in the general population, with a distinct male predominance (approximately 2:1) and a greater incidence in the permanent dentition [
17,
27]. The anterior maxilla represents the most common site of occurrence, particularly the mesiodens type. Approximately 75% of supernumerary teeth are impacted and asymptomatic, often discovered incidentally during routine radiographic assessments [
2]. To provide a clearer understanding of the occurrence and clinical behavior of supernumerary teeth,
Table 1 compiles essential epidemiological and clinical data reported in the literature.
The clinical impact of ST varies with location, morphology, and eruption status
[29]. While some remain clinically silent, others contribute to malocclusion, delayed eruption of permanent successors, or diastemas, and may cause aesthetic and functional disturbances that require multidisciplinary management [
31,
32].
Diagnostic Essentials
Accurate diagnosis and precise localization are indispensable for successful treatment planning and prevention of secondary complications [
2,
18]. Traditional two-dimensional radiographic methods [
33], such as panoramic (orthopantomogram) and periapical radiographs (
Figure 3), remain valuable as initial diagnostic tools that often fail to provide sufficient information regarding the three-dimensional relationship between ST and adjacent anatomical structures [
33,
34].
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) addresses these limitations and has become a cornerstone in contemporary diagnostic protocols [
35]. CBCT allows high-resolution, three-dimensional imaging from a single scan, offering detailed visualization of supernumerary tooth morphology, spatial orientation, and proximity to vital structures such as the nasal floor, maxillary sinus, and mandibular canal [
35,
36]. Moreover, CBCT has been shown to enhance the detection of associated pathologies, such as root resorption and cyst formation, with greater precision than conventional radiography [
35,
36]. Nevertheless, given the higher radiation exposure, its use should be carefully justified based on a risk-benefit assessment for each case [
37,
38].
AI systems that use CBCT scans can interpret the images precisely and suggest the most suitable surgical strategy for managing supernumerary teeth. This technology makes the operation easier and faster to perform [
15].
Management Strategies and Current Controversies
The therapeutic management of supernumerary teeth generally follows two principal approaches, extraction or non-extraction (clinical monitoring), with the choice largely determined by the tooth’s position, its relationship to adjacent anatomical structures, and the presence or risk of associated pathology [
39]. In cases where supernumerary teeth interfere with eruption, alignment, or occlusion, surgical removal is typically indicated. Asymptomatic and non-disruptive teeth may be observed periodically through clinical and radiographic follow-up [
39,
40].
A persistent point of debate within the literature concerns the optimal timing of surgical intervention [
41,
42,
43]. The late approach advocates postponing extraction until after the apical closure of the permanent incisors, generally around the age of ten years. This strategy minimizes the risk of damaging developing roots and surrounding periodontal structures, thereby preserving long-term dental integrity. In contrast, the early approach supports immediate removal upon diagnosis, particularly when the supernumerary tooth exhibits an oblique orientation, distorted morphology, or a position that makes spontaneous eruption improbable [
18,
41,
42,
43].
Ultimately, the decision regarding timing must balance the risks of surgical trauma against the potential for eruption disturbances, the individual’s age, tooth development stage, and overall orthodontic and aesthetic prognosis [
42,
43].
Some clinicians advocate for non-intervention in asymptomatic cases, emphasizing the importance of long-term monitoring to avoid surgical complications [
44,
45]. This ongoing debate highlights the need for evidence-based, individualized management strategies grounded in comprehensive diagnostic assessment and interdisciplinary collaboration.
The primary objective of this multicentric study was to analyze the epidemiological, morphological, and radiographic characteristics of supernumerary teeth (ST) in a Romanian population, identify clinical and occlusal correlations, and determine predictors of impaction using multivariate analysis. Secondary objectives included assessing the diagnostic performance of conventional radiography versus CBCT and evaluating the relationship between supernumerary morphology, location, and associated pathologies.
2. Materials and Methods
This multicentric, observational, analytical study was conducted between January 2020 and March 2025 in two Romanian academic centers: the University Dental Clinics of Târgu Mureș and Sibiu. A retrospective review of clinical and radiographic records was performed to identify all eligible patients. One hundred fifty-three consecutive patients with clinically and radiographically confirmed supernumerary teeth (ST) who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled from the three academic centers. The use of consecutive sampling across the study period minimizes selection bias. The study adhered to the STROBE reporting guidelines for observational research. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants or legal guardians.
2.1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria comprised patients presenting one or more supernumerary teeth in mixed or permanent dentition, with complete diagnostic records including orthopantomogram (OPG) and/or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
Exclusion criteria included syndromic disorders (e.g., cleidocranial dysplasia, Gardner’s syndrome), craniofacial trauma, prior orthodontic or surgical interventions, or incomplete imaging documentation.
2.2. Clinical and Radiographic Examination
Clinical examination included assessment of eruption status, dental crowding, malposition, and associated cystic or resorptive changes. Radiological evaluation followed a standardized diagnostic protocol:
OPG (Digital panoramic radiography) for screening and global assessment.
Periapical and occlusal radiographs to refine localization.
CBCT for complex or ambiguous cases, performed at 0.2–0.3 mm voxel resolution, 8 × 8 cm field of view, and 90 kVp/10 mA exposure parameters.
Two calibrated examiners (oral radiologists) independently analyzed the images, and inter-observer agreement was excellent (Cohen’s κ = 0.91). Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.
2.3. Classification Criteria
Supernumerary teeth were categorized according to:
- -
Morphology: conical, tuberculate, supplemental, or odontomatous.
- -
Topography: mesiodens, paramolar, distomolar, or supernumerary premolar.
- -
Eruption status: erupted, impacted, or included.
Malocclusion was classified using Angle’s classification (Class I, II/1, II/2, III) to assess potential occlusal associations.
2.4. Bias Mitigation
To mitigate potential sources of bias inherent in this observational study design, several steps were taken:
- -
Selection Bias: Sampling for all eligible patients seen between January 2020 and March 2025 aimed to minimize selection bias by preventing the deliberate exclusion or inclusion of patients based on their complication severity.
- -
Information Bias (Measurement Bias): To ensure high reliability of radiological data, two calibrated examiners (oral radiologists) independently analyzed all images. The subsequent calculation and verification of excellent inter-observer agreement (kappa = 0.91) standardized the radiographic interpretation, limiting measurement bias.
- -
Confounding Bias: The study controlled for several known potential confounders of impaction, including age, gender, and malocclusion, by including these variables in the Binary Logistic Regression model (as detailed in Section 2.5).
Given this study's retrospective, multicentric nature, a formal a priori power analysis was not performed. Instead, the final sample size of 153 consecutive patients represented the maximum available population meeting all inclusion criteria within the five-year study period (2020–2025). Based on the final logistic regression model, which identified four significant independent predictors of impaction using 153 cases, the sample size was deemed sufficient to achieve appropriate power to detect the reported effects (OR = 1.78 to 3.12) with a p < 0.05 and a confidence level of 95%.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
All data were entered into IBM SPSS v29.0 and RStudio v2024.3. Descriptive statistics summarized demographic, morphological, and radiographic findings. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical comparisons, and independent t-tests for continuous variables. Spearman’s correlation assessed relationships between continuous variables. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of impaction. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.
4. Discussion
This multicentric investigation provides a detailed evaluation of the epidemiological, clinical, and radiological profiles of supernumerary teeth in a Romanian population, offering new insights into the interplay between morphology, occlusion, and impaction risk. The study’s findings reinforce and expand current understanding of ST behavior and support the importance of individualized, imaging-guided management strategies.
The male predominance (59.5%) observed aligns with the widely reported gender disparity, confirming previous data from European and Asian populations, where male-to-female ratios range from 1.4:1 to 3.2:1 [
18,
35,
46,
47,
48]. This trend may reflect the influence of sex-linked genetic factors or differential expression of odontogenic regulatory genes such as
WNT10A or
RUNX2, known to participate in dental lamina signaling pathways [
49]. The predominance of detection between
6 and 12 years further emphasizes the role of panoramic screening during early mixed dentition, when most supernumerary formations become radiographically visible and can be intercepted before causing eruption disturbances [
50].
Morphologically, the conical form was the most prevalent (48.6%), consistent with earlier studies by Davidson et al. (2025) and Rajab and Hamdan (2002), which reported similar frequencies of 45–55% [
2,
51]. The second most common type, tuberculate teeth (27%), demonstrated a distinct pathological profile, showing stronger associations with delayed eruption and cystic transformation [
2,
15]. This is biologically plausible, as tuberculate teeth possess irregular morphology and multicuspid crowns that impede the normal eruption pathway, predisposing to impaction and pericoronal cyst development [
52].
Supplemental and odontomatous forms in a smaller proportion support the theory that hyperactivity of the dental lamina leads to variable degrees of morphological differentiation [
20,
21,
22,
23].
Topographically, mesiodens accounted for 56.2% of all supernumerary teeth, confirming that the anterior maxilla is the predominant site of occurrence [
1,
2,
28]. This localization correlates with the area of greatest embryonic epithelial complexity and supports the dental lamina hyperactivity theory as the prevailing etiopathogenic model [
1,
2,
21,
22,
23,
28]. The clustering of supernumerary teeth in this region may also be influenced by mechanical and spatial constraints during incisor eruption, explaining the higher frequency of impactions in anterior sectors [
1,
52,
53,
54].
From an orthodontic standpoint, the distribution of Angle classes provides a novel dimension to understanding the skeletal context of supernumerary teeth. The significant association between Class III malocclusion and anterior impactions (p = 0.008) represents an original finding. Similar tendencies have been noted in Korean and Turkish cohorts, where concave facial growth patterns and anterior cross-bites were correlated with restricted eruption spaces [
55,
56,
57]. This relationship may be mediated by anteroposterior maxillary deficiency, altering the eruption trajectory of incisors and promoting mesiodens impaction.
The logistic regression model strengthened these associations, identifying younger age (<13 years), male gender, tuberculate morphology, and Class III malocclusion as independent predictors of impaction. Younger patients showed a 3.1-fold higher risk, reflecting developmental timing, since many permanent successors are still unerupted, and increased detectability in early radiographic surveys. Male gender nearly doubled the odds of impaction (OR = 1.78), paralleling reports from Ferrés-Padró et al. (2013) and Patil et al. (2020) [
58,
59], which attributed this tendency to sexual dimorphism in craniofacial growth and tooth bud spacing. The finding that tuberculate morphology increases cystic potential nearly three-fold (OR = 2.93) supports the notion that crown form directly influences pathological sequelae.
The positive correlation between age and the number of supernumerary teeth (ρ = 0.33, p < 0.001) can be interpreted as a detection bias but also indicates that multiple ST, especially distomolars and premolars, mineralize later and thus appear progressively in older patients. Comparable age-related trends were reported by Anthonappa et al. (2015), reinforcing the need for long-term radiographic follow-up in patients with known mesiodens, as additional teeth may develop subsequently [
15].
Radiographically, this study confirmed the diagnostic superiority of CBCT over orthopantomography. While OPG detected 92.4% of ST, CBCT achieved full detection and revealed additional findings—11 unrecognized root resorptions and 9 vestibulo-palatal displacements. The high inter-modality concordance (κ = 0.89) supports the reliability of panoramic screening for preliminary assessment, validating CBCT as the gold standard for surgical planning, particularly for teeth adjacent to vital structures or in complex morphologies [
60,
61]. These observations echo the results of Primosch (1981) and recent analyses by Gündüz et al. (2022), emphasizing CBCT’s critical role in minimizing iatrogenic risks during extraction [
62,
63]. However, consistent with ALARA principles, CBCT should be reserved for cases where conventional imaging is inconclusive or where three-dimensional spatial orientation dictates treatment choice [
64,
65].
Clinically, 40.5% of patients presented complications, with delayed eruption (19.6%) as the most frequent, followed by malposition (12.4%), cyst formation (4.6%), and root resorption (3.9%). These frequencies are comparable to the 30–40% complication rates described by Fardi et al. (2011) and Kara et al. (2012) [
66,
67]. The link between tuberculate morphology and cystic change observed in our series mirrors the findings of He et al. (2023), who reported cystic transformation in 9–11% of cases, increasing with age [
35]. Thus, early diagnosis prevents impaction and mitigates the risk of secondary pathologies that complicate orthodontic management.
Overall, the findings support early radiographic screening, ideally between 6 and 8 years, when eruption disturbances can be anticipated and minimally invasive extraction can be performed before root maturation of permanent successors. However, the debate regarding early versus delayed surgical removal remains relevant. Our data suggest early intervention for obliquely positioned or tuberculate forms, and delayed extraction after apical closure may be justified for conical mesiodens without associated complications. Therefore, a balanced, patient-specific approach remains fundamental.
Despite employing rigorous consecutive sampling and high inter-rater reliability, the study acknowledges several limitations inherent to its multicentric, observational design. First, the university clinic-based patient recruitment introduces referral bias, as our cohort may disproportionately represent symptomatic cases or those with complex impactions referred for specialized care, potentially overestimating the true prevalence of complications (40.5%) in the general population. Second, while CBCT protocols were standardized, slight variations in imaging equipment and voxel resolution across the participating centers may contribute to minimal information heterogeneity. Finally, the study’s cross-sectional nature precludes definitive causal inference; thus, the identified predictors (e.g., tuberculate morphology) define a strong risk association but not a direct cause-and-effect relationship.
Future research should aim for longitudinal follow-up to assess eruption outcomes after early versus delayed intervention and to evaluate
recurrence or subsequent development of additional supernumerary teeth. Integrating genomic and epigenetic analyses, including candidate gene mapping for
WNT10A,
RUNX2, and
AXIN2 polymorphisms, may clarify the molecular basis of dental lamina hyperactivity [
49]. Expanding sample diversity across ethnic and age groups would enhance generalizability. Furthermore, AI-assisted radiographic evaluation could standardize detection and improve diagnostic reproducibility in large cohorts.
Supernumerary teeth represent a multifactorial developmental anomaly with diverse clinical presentations and potential complications. Their management demands a careful balance between timely intervention and conservative monitoring, guided by accurate imaging and individualized clinical judgment. Spanning genetic, environmental, and developmental factors, the complexity of their etiology underscores the importance of continued research to refine diagnostic methods and establish standardized treatment protocols. Ultimately, successful management of ST relies on an integrated approach that unites the expertise of orthodontists, oral surgeons, and radiologists to ensure optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes.
This study successfully characterizes the morphological and epidemiological patterns of supernumerary teeth, identifies risk factors for impaction, and evaluates diagnostic tools.