Submitted:
27 October 2025
Posted:
29 October 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- The further characterization of the optimized BC@CMC suspension in aqueous environments under varying pH and ionic strength conditions to elucidate the influence of external parameters.
- The investigation of the delivery of the BC@CMC suspension as adsorbent within a simulated aquifer in a glass-beads packed column, followed by an evaluation of its adsorption capabilities through the continuous injection of synthetically contaminated water.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Production of Pinewood Biochar
2.2. Preparation of the BC@CMC Colloidal Suspensions
2.3. Stability Tests: Effects of Ionic Strength and pH
2.4. Distribution Tests: Injection Simulation of BC@CMC in an IPRB
- The BC@CMC composite suspension was continuously fed from a magnetically stirred beaker using a Gilson Miniplus Evolution (Milan, Italy) peristaltic pump and injected into the column in an up-flow configuration to prevent air entrapment.
- The effluent from the column outlet was automatically collected into glass tubes by a fraction collector (Gilson 201-202) to facilitate monitoring.
- Distribution: Injection of the BC suspension to evaluate its transport through the porous medium.
- Elution: Subsequent flushing with ultra-pure water to elute weakly retained BC particles and quantify the fraction permanently retained by the column, thereby enabling a mass balance calculation.
- Qᵢ (L∙h-1) is the flow rate at the i-th time interval;
- ti (h) is the i-th time interval;
- C0 (g∙L-1) is the inlet BC concentration;
- Cᵢ (g∙L-1) is the effluent BC concentration at the i-th time interval.
2.5. Sedimentation Experiments on BC@CMC Suspensions
- The BC@CMC suspension was prepared as described in paragraph 2.2, maintaining a CMC concentration of 10 g L⁻¹ and varying the BC concentration between 1 and 5 g L⁻¹.
- 10 mL of the prepared suspension was placed into test tubes, and its stability was monitored through periodic sampling and photometric analysis.
- af is the absorbance (BC concentration) at the investigated time;
- ai is the absorbance (BC concentration) at the start of the experiment.
2.6. Contaminant Adsorption Isotherms
- S (mgCONT·gBC⁻¹) is the concentration of adsorbed contaminant on the BC;
- KF (Ln·gBC-1·mgCONT1-n) is Freundlich’s constant;
- C (mgCONT·L-1) is the equilibrium liquid-phase contaminant;
- n (dimensionless) is Freundlich’s exponent.
- The Freundlich constants KF and n were determined using SigmaPlot 12.0 software.
2.7. Continuous Flow Contaminant Adsorption on Distributed BC – IPRB Process Simulation
- Qᵢ (L∙h-1) is the flow rate at the i-th time interval;
- ti (h) is the i-th time interval;
- C0,i (g∙L-1) is the inlet contaminant concentration at the i-th time interval;
- Cᵢ (g∙L-1) is the effluent contminant concentration at the i-th time interval.
- C₀ (mg∙L-1) is the average contaminant concentration in the column feed
- C (mg∙L-1) is the average contaminant concentration in the column discharge
- PV (dimensionless) is the number of pore volumes fed to the column
- a and b (dimensionless) model parameters
- ρ (g∙L-1) is the adsorbent bed density
- ε (dimensionless) is the bed porosity
- KF (Ln∙gn) is Freundlich’s constant
- C0 (g∙L-1) is the average column feed contaminant concentration
- n (dimensionless) is Freundlich’s exponent
- C₀ (mg∙L-1) is the average contaminant concentration in the column feed
- C (mg∙L-1) is the average contaminant concentration in the column discharge
- PV (dimensionless) is the number of pore volumes fed to the column
2.8. Characterization Techniques and Analytical Methods
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Stability Tests on BC@CMC Suspension
3.1.1. Effect of Ionic Strength
3.1.2. Effect of pH
3.2. Distribution Tests: Injection Simulation of BC@CMC in an IPRB
- Distribution of unfiltered BC@CMC (1-10 g·L⁻¹)
- Distribution of BC@CMC (1-10 g·L⁻¹) filtered at 50 μm
- Distribution of BC@CMC (1-10 g·L⁻¹) filtered at 64 μm
- Distribution of BC@CMC (3-10 g·L⁻¹) filtered at 64 μm
3.2.1. Distribution of Unfiltered BC@CMC (1-10 g·L⁻¹)
3.2.2. Distribution of BC@CMC (1-10 g·L⁻¹) Filtered at 50 and 64 μm
3.2.3. Distribution of BC@CMC (3-10 g/L) Filtered at 64 μm
3.3. Sedimentation Tests to Verify High Concentration BC@CMC Stability
3.4. Contaminant Adsorption Isotherms on BC and AC
3.5. Continuous Flow Contaminant Adsorption on Distributed BC – IPRB Process Simulation
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AC | Activated Carbon |
| BC | Biochar |
| BC1 | Biochar 1 g∙L-1 |
| BC3 | Biochar 3 g∙L-1 |
| CAC | Colloidal Activated Carbon |
| CMC | Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose |
| DLS | Dynamic Light Scattering |
| GC-FID | Gas Chromatography – Flame Ionization Detector |
| IS | Ionic Strength |
| IPRB | Injectable Permeable Reactive Barrier |
| DNAPL | Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids |
| LNAPL | Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids |
| NAPL | Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids |
| PCE | Perchloroethylene |
| PRB | Permeable Reactive Barrier |
| PMMA | Polymethylmethacrylate |
| PV | Pore Volume |
| TOL | Toluene |
| UV-Vis-NIR | Ultraviolet – Visible – Near InfraRed |
References
- Ravindiran, G.; Rajamanickam, S.; Sivarethinamohan, S.; Karupaiya Sathaiah, B.; Ravindran, G.; Muniasamy, S.K.; Hayder, G. A Review of the Status, Effects, Prevention, and Remediation of Groundwater Contamination for Sustainable Environment. Water 2023, 15, 3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, Z.; Rashid, A.; Ghani, J.; Nawab, J.; Zeng, X.-C.; Shah, M.; Alrefaei, A.F.; Kamel, M.; Aleya, L.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; et al. Groundwater Contamination through Potentially Harmful Metals and Its Implications in Groundwater Management. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 1021596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karunanidhi, D.; Subramani, T.; Srinivasamoorthy, K.; Yang, Q. Environmental Chemistry, Toxicity and Health Risk Assessment of Groundwater: Environmental Persistence and Management Strategies. Environmental Research 2022, 214, 113884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, P.; Karunanidhi, D.; Subramani, T.; Srinivasamoorthy, K. Sources and Consequences of Groundwater Contamination. Arch Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2021, 80, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandnani, G.; Gandhi, P.; Kanpariya, D.; Parikh, D.; Shah, M. A Comprehensive Analysis of Contaminated Groundwater: Special Emphasis on Nature-Ecosystem and Socio-Economic Impacts. Groundwater for Sustainable Development 2022, 19, 100813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abanyie, S.K.; Apea, O.B.; Abagale, S.A.; Amuah, E.E.Y.; Sunkari, E.D. Sources and Factors Influencing Groundwater Quality and Associated Health Implications: A Review. Emerging Contaminants 2023, 9, 100207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurwadkar, S. Occurrence and Distribution of Organic and Inorganic Pollutants in Groundwater. Water Environment Research 2019, 91, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Du, J.; Jia, C.; Yang, T.; Shao, S. Groundwater Pollution Risk, Health Effects and Sustainable Management of Halocarbons in Typical Industrial Parks. Environmental Research 2024, 250, 118422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, J.; Sun, Z. Evaluation of Shallow Groundwater Contamination and Associated Human Health Risk in an Alluvial Plain Impacted by Agricultural and Industrial Activities, Mid-West China. Expo Health 2016, 8, 311–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sethi, R.; Di Molfetta, A. Transport of Immiscible Fluids. In Groundwater Engineering; Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2019; ISBN 978-3-030-20514-0. [Google Scholar]
- Ju, M.; Li, X.; Wu, R.; Xu, Z.; Yin, H. Research Hotspots and Trend Analysis in Modeling Groundwater Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination Based on Bibliometrics. Water 2024, 16, 2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suo, K.; Zhao, M.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Jia, M. A Study on the Monitoring of LNAPL Migration Using ERT. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0315624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almaliki, D.F.; Ramli, H.; Zaiter, A. Experimental Investigation of Single and Intermittent Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid Spills Under Dynamic Groundwater. Civ Eng J 2025, 11, 290–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waqar, A. Evaluation of Factors Causing Lateral Migration of Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids (LNAPLs) in Onshore Oil Spill Accidents. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2024, 31, 10853–10873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cavelan, A.; Golfier, F.; Colombano, S.; Davarzani, H.; Deparis, J.; Faure, P. A Critical Review of the Influence of Groundwater Level Fluctuations and Temperature on LNAPL Contaminations in the Context of Climate Change. Science of The Total Environment 2022, 806, 150412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cavelan, A.; Faure, P.; Lorgeoux, C.; Colombano, S.; Deparis, J.; Davarzani, D.; Enjelvin, N.; Oltean, C.; Tinet, A.-J.; Domptail, F.; et al. An Experimental Multi-Method Approach to Better Characterize the LNAPL Fate in Soil under Fluctuating Groundwater Levels. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2024, 262, 104319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, J.; Chen, X.; Ye, B.; Wang, Z.; Sun, Y.; Wu, J.; Guo, H. A Comparative Study of DNAPL Migration and Transformation in Confined and Unconfined Groundwater Systems. Water Research 2023, 245, 120649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Budania, R.; Dangayach, S. A Comprehensive Review on Permeable Reactive Barrier for the Remediation of Groundwater Contamination. Journal of Environmental Management 2023, 332, 117343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawrinenko, M.; Kurwadkar, S.; Wilkin, R.T. Long-Term Performance Evaluation of Zero-Valent Iron Amended Permeable Reactive Barriers for Groundwater Remediation – A Mechanistic Approach. Geoscience Frontiers 2023, 14, 101494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Obiri-Nyarko, F.; Grajales-Mesa, S.J.; Malina, G. An Overview of Permeable Reactive Barriers for in Situ Sustainable Groundwater Remediation. Chemosphere 2014, 111, 243–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faisal, A.A.H.; Sulaymon, A.H.; Khaliefa, Q.M. A Review of Permeable Reactive Barrier as Passive Sustainable Technology for Groundwater Remediation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 15, 1123–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciampi, P.; Cassiani, G.; Deidda, G.P.; Esposito, C.; Rizzetto, P.; Pizzi, A.; Papini, M.P. Understanding the Dynamics of Enhanced Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids (LNAPL) Remediation at a Polluted Site: Insights from Hydrogeophysical Findings and Chemical Evidence. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 932, 172934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.-W.; Wei, K.-H.; Xu, S.-W.; Cui, J.; Ma, J.; Xiao, X.-L.; Xi, B.-D.; He, X.-S. Surfactant-Enhanced Remediation of Oil-Contaminated Soil and Groundwater: A Review. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 756, 144142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Z.; Ou, Z.; Wan, Y.; Su, Z.; Xia, Z.; Sun, X.; Cheng, F.; Liu, L.; Chen, Z.; Xue, Q. Modeling and Simulation of Steam-Enhanced Extraction: Parameter Effect of Injected Steam-Air Mixture on NAPL Remediation at Contaminated Sites. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2025, 495, 138953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sakr, M.; El Agamawi, H.; Klammler, H.; Mohamed, M.M. A Review on the Use of Permeable Reactive Barriers as an Effective Technique for Groundwater Remediation. Groundwater for Sustainable Development 2023, 21, 100914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Cao, B.; Yin, H.; Meng, L.; Jin, W.; Wang, F.; Xu, J.; Al-Tabbaa, A. Application of Zeolites in Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRBs) for in-Situ Groundwater Remediation: A Critical Review. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, C.; Chen, X.; Mack, E.E.; Wang, S.; Du, W.; Yin, Y.; Banwart, S.A.; Guo, H. Evaluating a Novel Permeable Reactive Bio-Barrier to Remediate PAH-Contaminated Groundwater. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2019, 368, 444–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, J.; Huang, G.; Han, D.; Hou, Q.; Gan, L.; Zhang, M. A Review of Reactive Media within Permeable Reactive Barriers for the Removal of Heavy Metal(Loid)s in Groundwater: Current Status and Future Prospects. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021, 319, 128644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.; Chakma, S.; Birke, V. Performance of Field-Scale Permeable Reactive Barriers: An Overview on Potentials and Possible Implications for in-Situ Groundwater Remediation Applications. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 858, 158838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Earnden, L.; Marangoni, A.G.; Gregori, S.; Paschos, A.; Pensini, E. Zein-Bonded Graphene and Biosurfactants Enable the Electrokinetic Clean-Up of Hydrocarbons. Langmuir 2021, 37, 11153–11169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, M.-S.; Annable, M.D.; Kim, H. Temporary Hydraulic Barriers Using Organic Gel for Enhanced Aquifer Remediation during Groundwater Flushing: Bench-Scale Experiments. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2023, 255, 104143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gholami, F.; Mosmeri, H.; Shavandi, M.; Dastgheib, S.M.M.; Amoozegar, M.A. Application of Encapsulated Magnesium Peroxide (MgO2) Nanoparticles in Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB) for Naphthalene and Toluene Bioremediation from Groundwater. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 655, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammadian, S.; Tabani, H.; Boosalik, Z.; Asadi Rad, A.; Krok, B.; Fritzsche, A.; Khodaei, K.; Meckenstock, R.U. In Situ Remediation of Arsenic-Contaminated Groundwater by Injecting an Iron Oxide Nanoparticle-Based Adsorption Barrier. Water 2022, 14, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pak, T.; Luz, L.F.D.L.; Tosco, T.; Costa, G.S.R.; Rosa, P.R.R.; Archilha, N.L. Pore-Scale Investigation of the Use of Reactive Nanoparticles for in Situ Remediation of Contaminated Groundwater Source. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2020, 117, 13366–13373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Chen, X.; Wang, S.; Luo, Y.; Du, W.; Yin, Y.; Guo, H. A Field Study of a Novel Permeable-Reactive-Biobarrier to Remediate Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Contaminated Groundwater. Environmental Pollution 2024, 351, 124042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Li, W.; Chen, H.; Liu, F.; Jin, S.; Yin, X.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, B. Effects of Calcium Ion and pH on the Adsorption/Regeneration Process by Activated Carbon Permeable Reactive Barriers. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 16834–16841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Basaleh, A.; Hassan, A.; Tawabini, B.; Mahmoud, M.; Alghamdi, F.; Althubiti, A.; Alrayaan, M.; Al-Nasser, R. Removal of MTBE and BTEX Pollutants from Contaminated Water Using Colloidal Activated Carbon (CAC). ACS Omega 2025, 10, 509–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McGregor, R. In Situ Treatment of PFAS-impacted Groundwater Using Colloidal Activated Carbon. Remediation Journal 2018, 28, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molé, R.A.; Velosa, A.C.; Carey, G.R.; Liu, X.; Li, G.; Fan, D.; Danko, A.; Lowry, G.V. Groundwater Solutes Influence the Adsorption of Short-Chain Perfluoroalkyl Acids (PFAA) to Colloidal Activated Carbon and Impact Performance for in Situ Groundwater Remediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024, 474, 134746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunarathne, V.; Melo, T.M.; Schauerte, M.; Groth, F.; Slaný, M.; Rinklebe, J. Immobilization of Per- and Polyfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) from Field Contaminated Groundwater by a Novel Organo-Clay vs. Colloidal Activated Carbon under Flow Conditions. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2025, 488, 137273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ndubueze, E.U.; Boparai, H.K.; Xu, L.; Sleep, B.E. Colloidal Properties and Stability of Colloidal Activated Carbon: Effects of Aqueous Chemistry on Sedimentation Kinetics. Environ. Sci.: Nano 2024, 11, 4391–4408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, X.; Kong, L.; Liu, C.; Fan, D.; Anger, B.; Johnson, W.P.; Lowry, G.V.; Li, G.; Danko, A.; Liu, X. Polymer Coatings Affect Transport and Remobilization of Colloidal Activated Carbon in Saturated Sand Columns: Implications for In Situ Groundwater Remediation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 8531–8541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Z.; Luo, S.; Liang, M.; Ning, Z.; Sun, W.; Zhu, Y.; Mo, J.; Li, Y.; Huang, W.; Chen, C. Colloidal Stability of Nanosized Activated Carbon in Aquatic Systems: Effects of pH, Electrolytes, and Macromolecules. Water Research 2021, 203, 117561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, M.; Liu, L.; Ling, Q.; Cai, Y.; Yu, S.; Wang, S.; Fu, D.; Hu, B.; Wang, X. Biochar for the Removal of Contaminants from Soil and Water: A Review. Biochar 2022, 4, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, T.; Li, Y.; Cheng, H. Biochars and Engineered Biochars for Water and Soil Remediation: A Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, T.; Reddy, K.R.; Wang, C.; Yargicoglu, E.; Spokas, K. Characteristics and Applications of Biochar for Environmental Remediation: A Review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 2015, 45, 939–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddiq, O.M.; Tawabini, B.S.; Soupios, P.; Ntarlagiannis, D. Removal of Arsenic from Contaminated Groundwater Using Biochar: A Technical Review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 19, 651–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajapaksha, A.U.; Chen, S.S.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Zhang, M.; Vithanage, M.; Mandal, S.; Gao, B.; Bolan, N.S.; Ok, Y.S. Engineered/Designer Biochar for Contaminant Removal/Immobilization from Soil and Water: Potential and Implication of Biochar Modification. Chemosphere 2016, 148, 276–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Y.; Han, Y.; Wang, T.; Chen, J.; Tsang, D.C.W. Biochar-Supported Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron as an Efficient Catalyst for Organic Degradation in Groundwater. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2020, 383, 121240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qian, L.; Chen, Y.; Ouyang, D.; Zhang, W.; Han, L.; Yan, J.; Kvapil, P.; Chen, M. Field Demonstration of Enhanced Removal of Chlorinated Solvents in Groundwater Using Biochar-Supported Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 698, 134215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lyu, H.; Tang, J.; Cui, M.; Gao, B.; Shen, B. Biochar/Iron (BC/Fe) Composites for Soil and Groundwater Remediation: Synthesis, Applications, and Mechanisms. Chemosphere 2020, 246, 125609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- . Petrangeli Papini, M.; Cerra, S.; Feriaud, D.; Pettiti, I.; Lorini, L.; Fratoddi, I. Biochar/Biopolymer Composites for Potential In Situ Groundwater Remediation. Materials 2024, 17, 3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C. Statistical Mechanical Study on the Freundlich Isotherm Equation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 1998, 208, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, K.H. Fitting the Gompertz Equation to Asymmetric Breakthrough Curves. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2020, 8, 103713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buragohain, P.; Garg, A.; Feng, S.; Lin, P.; Sreedeep, S. Understanding the Retention and Fate Prediction of Copper Ions in Single and Competitive System in Two Soils: An Experimental and Numerical Investigation. Science of The Total Environment 2018, 634, 951–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- .Rodrigues, A.E. Residence Time Distribution (RTD) Revisited. Chemical Engineering Science 2021, 230, 116188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lopez, C.G.; Richtering, W. Oscillatory Rheology of Carboxymethyl Cellulose Gels: Influence of Concentration and pH. Carbohyd. Polym. 2021, 267, 118117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Si, H.; Chen, X.; Mao, M.; Shang, J. Influence of Natural Organic Matter on the Aggregation Dynamics of Biochar Colloids Derived from Various Feedstocks. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 946, 174097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoogendam, C.W.; De Keizer, A.; Cohen Stuart, M.A.; Bijsterbosch, B.H.; Smit, J.A.M.; Van Dijk, J.A.P.P.; Van Der Horst, P.M.; Batelaan, J.G. Persistence Length of Carboxymethyl Cellulose As Evaluated from Size Exclusion Chromatography and Potentiometric Titrations. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 6297–6309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dogsa, I.; Tomšič, M.; Orehek, J.; Benigar, E.; Jamnik, A.; Stopar, D. Amorphous Supramolecular Structure of Carboxymethyl Cellulose in Aqueous Solution at Different pH Values as Determined by Rheology, Small Angle X-Ray and Light Scattering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 111, 492–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Auset, M.; Keller, A.A. Pore-scale Visualization of Colloid Straining and Filtration in Saturated Porous Media Using Micromodels. Water Resources Research 2006, 42, 2005WR004639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- .Wakeman, R. The Influence of Particle Properties on Filtration. Separation and Purification Technology 2007, 58, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carman, P.C. Fluid Flow through Granular Beds. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 1997, 75, S32–S48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tien, C. Principles of Filtration; Elsevier: Amsterdam Boston Paris, 2012; ISBN 978-0-444-56366-8. [Google Scholar]
- Heller, W.; Pugh, T.L. “Steric” Stabilization of Colloidal Solutions by Adsorption of Flexible Macromolecules. J. Polym. Sci. 1960, 47, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newell, C.J.; Smith, W.B.; Kearney, K.; Clay, S.; Javed, H.; Carey, G.R.; Richardson, S.D.; Werth, C.J. Tool and Database for Estimating Potential Longevity of Colloidal Activated Carbon Barriers for PFAS in Groundwater. Remediation Journal 2025, 35, e70017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carey, G.R.; Anderson, R.H.; Van Geel, P.; McGregor, R.; Soderberg, K.; Danko, A.; Hakimabadi, S.G.; Pham, A.L.; Rebeiro-Tunstall, M. Analysis of Colloidal Activated Carbon Alternatives for in Situ Remediation of a Large PFAS Plume and Source Area. Remediation Journal 2024, 34, e21772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carey, G.R.; Hakimabadi, S.G.; Singh, M.; McGregor, R.; Woodfield, C.; Van Geel, P.J.; Pham, A.L. Longevity of Colloidal Activated Carbon for in Situ PFAS Remediation at AFFF-contaminated Airport Sites. Remediation Journal 2022, 33, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bradford, S.A.; Simunek, J.; Bettahar, M.; Van Genuchten, M.Th.; Yates, S.R. Modeling Colloid Attachment, Straining, and Exclusion in Saturated Porous Media. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 2242–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bradford, S.A.; Bettahar, M. Concentration Dependent Transport of Colloids in Saturated Porous Media. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2006, 82, 99–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Drwenski, T.; Hooijer, P.; Van Roij, R. Sedimentation Stacking Diagrams of Binary Mixtures of Thick and Thin Hard Rods. Soft Matter 2016, 12, 5684–5692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eckert, T.; Schmidt, M.; De Las Heras, D. Gravity-Induced Phase Phenomena in Plate-Rod Colloidal Mixtures. Commun Phys 2021, 4, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eckert, T.; Schmidt, M.; De Las Heras, D. Sedimentation Path Theory for Mass-Polydisperse Colloidal Systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2022, 157, 234901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bradford, S.A.; Simunek, J.; Bettahar, M.; Van Genuchten, M.T.; Yates, S.R. Significance of Straining in Colloid Deposition: Evidence and Implications. Water Resources Research 2006, 42, 2005WR004791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]












| Parameters → Test runs ↓ |
mBC (mg) | mPV (mg) | fBC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-50 | 10 ± 7 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.010 ± 0.007 |
| F-64-1 | 300 ± 10 | 9.9 ± 0.7 | 0.29 ± 0.05 |
| F-64-2 | 320 ± 10 | 9.9 ± 0.7 | 0.31 ± 0.05 |
| Suspension composition | Superficial sedimentation (s) at 96 h |
|---|---|
| BC@CMC 1 – 10 g∙L-1 | 37 ± 4 % |
| BC@CMC 2 – 10 g∙L-1 | 37 ± 1 % |
| BC@CMC 3 – 10 g∙L-1 | 39 ± 1 % |
| BC@CMC 4 – 10 g∙L-1 | 48 ± 5 % |
| BC@CMC 5 – 10 g∙L-1 | 52 ± 3 % |
| Adsorbents → | BC | AC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Parameters → Test runs ↓ |
KF (Ln·gADS-1·mgCONT1-n) |
n (adim.) |
KF (Ln·gADS-1·mgCONT1-n) |
n (adim.) |
| TOL | 30 ± 2 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 49 ± 2 | 0.38 ± 0.02 |
| PCE | 57 ± 4 | 0.59 ± 0.05 | 57 ± 5 | 0.48 ± 0.05 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).