Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Generalized Weighted Group Inverses of Banach Elements

Submitted:

22 October 2025

Posted:

24 October 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
We introduce the generalized weighted group inverse in Banach algebras, a novel concept that unifies the classical group inverse with quasinilpotent elements. We establish its fundamental characterization through an equivalence to a specific polar-like property and elucidate its structural relationship with the generalized weighted core inverse. Employing a novel limit-based approach, we extend the theory of the weak group inverse from matrices and Hilbert space operators to the general setting of Banach algebras, thereby significantly generalizing key existing results.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

A Banach algebra is called a Banach *-algebra if there exists an involution : x x satisfying ( x + y ) = x + y , ( λ x ) = λ ¯ x , ( x y ) = y x , ( x ) = x . Let A be a Banach *-algebra. An element a A has group inverse provided that there exists x A such that
x a 2 = a , a x 2 = x , a x = x a .
Such x is unique if exists, denoted by a # , and called the group inverse of a. As is well known, a square complex matrix A has group inverse if and only if r a n k ( A ) = r a n k ( A 2 ) . An element a A has core inverse if there exists some x A such that
x a 2 = a , a x 2 = x , ( a x ) = a x .
If such x exists, it is unique, and denote it by a # . Let R ( X ) represent the range space of a complex matrix X. A square complex matrix A has core inverse A # if and only if A A # is a projection and R ( A # ) R ( A ) (see [20]). Recently, Gao and Chen [8] introduced the core-EP inverse as a generalization of core inverse. An element a A has core-EP inverse if there exist x A and k N such that
x a k + 1 = a k , a x 2 = x , ( a x ) = a x .
If such x exists, it is unique, and denote it by a D . A square complex matrix X is the core-EP inverse of A if X A X = X , R ( X ) = R ( X ) = R ( A m ) where m is the Drazin index of A.
Recently, Wang and Chen (see [17]) introduced and studied weak group inverse for a square complex matrix. A square complex matrix A has weak group inverse X if it satisfies the system of equations: A X 2 = X , A X = A D A . The preceding X is unique and denoted by A W . The involution * is proper if x x = 0 x = 0 for any x A , e.g., in a Rickart *-algebra, the involution is always proper. Let C n × n be the Banach algebra of all n × n complex matrices, with conjugate transpose * as the involution. Then the involution * is proper. In [22], Zou et al. extend the notion of weak group inverse from complex matrices to elements in a ring with proper involution. We refer the reader for weak group inverse in [7,14,18,24,25].
Recall that a A has g-Drazin inverse (i.e., generalized Drazin inverse) if there exists x A such that
a x 2 = x , a x = x a , a a 2 x A q n i l .
Such x is unique, if exists, and denote it by a d . Here, A q n i l = { x A lim n x n 1 n = 0 } . As is well known, x A q n i l if and only if 1 + λ x A is invertible. The generalized Drazin inverse plays an important role in matrix and operator theory (see [4]). Recently, Mosić and Zhang introduced and studied weak group inverse for a Hilbert space operator A in B ( X ) d (see [15]).
The objective of this paper is to introduce and examine a novel class of generalized inverse, which acts as a seamless continuation of the weak group inverse applicable to complex matrices and operators in Hilbert spaces. In Section 2, we unveil the generalized weighted group inverse by means of an innovative generalized weighted group decomposition. This method reveals a plethora of fresh properties pertaining to the weak group inverse for complex matrices and operators within Hilbert spaces. Let e A be an invertible Hermitian element (i.e., e = e A is invertible).
Definition 1.1. 
An element a A has generalized e-group decomposition if there exist x , y A such that
a = x + y , x e y = y x = 0 , x A # , y A q n i l .
We prove that a A has generalized e-group decomposition if and only if there exists a x A such that
x = a x 2 , ( a e a 2 x ) = a e a 2 x , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
The element x is called the generalized e-group inverse of a, and we denote it by a g .
In Section 3, we characterize generalized weighted group inverse by using the generalized Drazin invertibility. We prove that a A has generalized e-group inverse if and only if a A d and the equation ( a d ) e a d x = ( a d ) a is solvable in A .
Evidently, a A has g-Drazin inverse if and only if it has quasi-polar property, i.e., there exists an idempotent p A such that
a + p A is invertible , p a = p a A q n i l
(see [4], [Theorem 6.4.8]). An element a A has generalized e-core inverse if there exists x A such that
x = a x 2 , ( e a x ) = e a x , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Such x is unique, if it exists, and we denote it by a e , d (see [5]). Evidently, the generalized e-core inverse and core-EP inverse in [11,13] for a Hilbert space operator coincide with each other. In the final section, we present polar-like and generalized e-core properties for the generalized weighted group inverse. These also provided new properties of weak group inverse for Hilbert space operators (see [15]).
Throughout the paper, all Banach algebras are complex with a proper involution *. We use A 1 , A # , A d , A e , d , A D and A W to denote the sets of all invertible, group invertible, g-Drazin invertible, generalized e-core invertible, core-EP invertible and weak group invertible in A , respectively.

2. Generalized e-Group Inverse

The purpose of this section is to introduce a new generalized inverse that serves as a natural extension of the weak group inverse in a Banach *-algebra. We begin with the following lemma.
Lemma 2.1. 
Let a A d . Then lim n | | ( a n a d a n + 1 ) | | 1 n = 0 .
Proof. 
Let x = a a d a 2 . Then x A q n i l . For any λ C , we have 1 λ ¯ x A 1 , and so 1 λ x A 1 . This implies that x A q n i l . We easily check that
| | ( a n a d a n + 1 ) | | 1 n = | | ( 1 a d a ) ( a n ) | | = | | [ ( 1 a d a ) n ] ( a n ) | | = | | [ ( a a d a 2 ) n ] | | = | | ( x ) n | | .
Since lim n | | ( x ) n | | 1 n = 0 , we have lim n | | ( a n a d a n + 1 ) | | 1 n = 0 .
Theorem 2.2. 
Let a A . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a A has generalized e-group decomposition.
(2)
There exists x A such that
x = a x 2 , ( a e a 2 x ) = a e a 2 x , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
(3)
a A d and there exists x A such that
x = a x 2 , ( a d ) e a 2 x = ( a d ) e a , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Proof. 
( 1 ) ( 3 ) By hypothesis, a has the generalized e-group decomposition a = a 1 + a 2 . Let x = a 1 # . Then a x 2 = ( a 1 + a 2 ) ( a 1 # ) 2 = a 1 ( a 1 # ) 2 = a 1 # = x .
Since a 2 a 1 = 0 , we have a x a 2 = ( a 1 + a 2 ) ( a 1 # a 1 + a 1 # a 2 ) ( a 1 + a 2 ) = ( 1 a 1 # a 1 a 1 # a 2 ) a 2 , and then
| | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = | | ( a x a 2 ) a n 1 | | 1 n = | | ( 1 a 1 # a 1 a 1 # a 2 ) a 2 ( a 1 + a 2 ) n 1 | | 1 n | | 1 a 1 # a 1 a 1 # a 2 | | 1 n | | a 2 n | | 1 n .
Since a 2 A q n i l , we have lim n | | a 2 n | | 1 n = 0 . Hence lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 . Since a 2 a 1 = 0 , a 1 a 1 π = 0 and a 2 d = 0 , it follows by [2, Corollary 3.4] that a A d and a d = a 1 # + n = 1 ( a 1 # ) n + 1 a 2 n . Then
( a d ) e a 2 = ( a 1 # ) e a 2 + n = 1 [ ( a 1 # ) n + 1 a 2 n ] e a 2 = [ ( a 1 # ) 2 ] ( a 1 e a 2 ) + n = 1 [ ( a 1 # ) n + 2 a 2 n ] ( a 1 e a 2 ) = 0 ;
hence, ( a d ) e a 1 = ( a d ) e a . Accordingly, ( a d ) e a 2 x = ( a d ) e ( a 1 + a 2 ) ( a 1 + a 2 ) a 1 # = ( a d ) e a 1 2 a 1 # = ( a d ) e a 1 = ( a d ) e a .
( 3 ) ( 2 ) By hypothesis, there exists x A such that
x = a x 2 , ( a d ) e a 2 x = ( a d ) e a , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Let a 1 = a 2 x and a 2 = a a 2 x . Then we check that
| | a 2 a 1 | | = | | ( a a 2 x ) a 2 x | | = | | a 3 x a 2 x a 2 x | | = | | a 3 x a 2 x a k + 1 x k | | = | | a 3 x a k + 2 x k + a 2 ( a k x a k + 1 ) x k a k + 2 x k | | | | a 3 x a k + 2 x k | | + | | a 2 | | | | a k x a k + 1 | | | | x k a k + 2 x k | | .
Then
| | a 2 a 1 | | 1 k | | a 2 | | 1 k | | a k x a k + 1 | | 1 k | | x k a k + 2 x k | | 1 k | | a 2 | | 1 k | | a k x a k + 1 | | 1 k ( 1 + | | a 2 | | 1 k | | a | | ) | | x | | .
Therefore lim k | | a 2 a 1 | | 1 k = 0 , and then a 2 a 1 = 0 .
Moreover, we have
| | a 1 e a 2 | | = | | ( a 2 x ) e ( a a 2 x ) | | = | | ( a 2 x ) e a ( a 2 x ) e a 2 x | | = | | ( a 2 x ) e a ( a k x k 1 ) e a 2 x | | = | | ( a 2 x ) e a [ ( a k a d a k + 1 ) x k 1 + a d a k + 1 x k 1 ] e a 2 x | | | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) | | ( x k 1 ) | | | | e a 2 x | | + | | ( a 2 x ) e a [ a d a k + 1 x k 1 ] e a 2 x | | | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) | | ( x k 1 ) | | | | e a 2 x | | + | | ( a 2 x ) e a [ a k + 1 x k 1 ] ( a d ) e a 2 x | | | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) | | ( x k 1 ) | | | | e a 2 x | | + | | ( a 2 x ) e a [ a k + 1 x k 1 ] ( a d ) e a | | | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) | | ( x k 1 ) | | | | e a 2 x | | + | | ( a 2 x ) e a [ a d a k + 1 x k 1 ] e a | | | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) | | ( x k 1 ) | | | | e a 2 x | | + | | ( a k x k 1 ) e a [ a d a k + 1 x k 1 ] e a | | | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) | | ( x k 1 ) | | | | e a 2 x | | + | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) x k 1 ] | | | | e a | | | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) | | | | ( x k 1 ) | | | | e a 2 x | | + | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) | | | | ( x k 1 ) | | | | e a | | .
Then
| | a 1 e a 2 | | 1 k | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) | | 1 k | | ( x k 1 ) | | 1 k | | e a 2 x | | 1 k + | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) | | 1 k | | ( x k 1 ) | | 1 k | | e a | | 1 k .
By using Lemma 2.1, we have lim k | | a 1 e a 2 | | 1 k = 0 ; whence, a 1 e a 2 = 0 .
We check that
a 1 x = a 2 x 2 = a ( a x 2 ) = a x = ( x a 2 ) x = x ( a 2 x ) = x a 1 , a 1 x a 1 = a x ( a 2 x ) = a 2 x = a 1 , x a 1 x = a 1 x 2 = ( a 2 x ) x 2 = a ( a x 2 ) x = a x 2 = x .
Hence a 1 # = x . Clearly, a = a 2 x + ( a a 2 x ) = a 1 + a 2 . Then we have a e a 2 x = ( a 1 + a 2 ) e ( a 1 + a 2 ) 2 a 1 # = ( a 1 + a 2 ) e a 1 = a 1 e a 1 + ( a 1 e a 2 ) = a 1 e a 1 . Accordingly, ( a e a 2 x ) = ( a 1 e a 1 ) = a 1 e a 1 = a e a 2 x , as required.
( 2 ) ( 1 ) By hypotheses, we have z A such that
z = a z 2 , ( a e a 2 z ) = a e a 2 z , lim n | | a n z a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
For any n N , we have a z = a ( a z 2 ) = a 2 z 2 = a 2 ( a z 2 ) z = a 3 z 3 = = a n z n = = a n + 1 z n + 1 . Thus, we prove that
| | z z a z | | = | | ( a z ) z z a z | | = | | ( a n z n ) z z ( a n + 1 z n + 1 ) | | = | | ( a n z a n + 1 ) z n + 1 | | .
Hence,
| | z z a z | | 1 n | | ( a n z a n + 1 ) | | 1 n | | z | | n + 1 n .
This implies that lim n | | z z a z | | 1 n = 0 , whence, z = z a z .
Set x = a 2 z and y = a a 2 z . Then a = x + y . We check that
( a z a 2 ) z = ( a z a 2 ) a z 2 = ( a z a 2 ) a 2 z 3 = ( a z a 2 ) a n 1 z n = ( a n z a n 1 ) z n .
Therefore
| | ( a z a 2 ) z | | 1 n | | a n z a n 1 | 1 n | | | z n | | 1 n .
Since lim n | | a n z a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 , we derive that lim n | | ( a z a 2 ) z | | 1 n = 0 . This implies that ( a z a 2 ) z = 0 .
We claim that x has group inverse. Evidently, we verify that
z x 2 = z a 2 z a 2 z = a ( z a 2 z ) = a 2 z = x , x z 2 = ( a 2 z ) z 2 = ( a 2 z 2 ) z = a z 2 = z , x z = a 2 z 2 = a z = z a 2 z = z x .
Hence, x A # .
We check that
| | ( a z a 2 ) n + 1 | | 1 n + 1 = | | ( a z a 2 ) n ( a z a 2 ) | | 1 n + 1 = | | ( a z a 2 ) n 1 ( a z a 2 ) a | | 1 n + 1 = | | ( a z a 2 ) n 1 a 2 | | 1 n + 1 = | | ( a z a 2 ) a n | | 1 n + 1 | | a n z a n + 1 | | 1 n n n + 1 | | a n | | 1 n + 1 .
Accordingly, lim n | | ( a z a 2 ) n + 1 | | 1 n + 1 = 0 . This implies that a z a 2 A q n i l . By using Cline’s formula (see [10], Theorem 2.1), y = a a 2 z A q n i l . Moreover, we see that
x e y = ( a 2 z ) e ( a a 2 z ) = [ z ( a 2 ) e a ] ( 1 a z ) = [ a e a 2 z ] ( 1 a z ) = ( a e a 2 z ) ( 1 a z ) = 0 , y x = ( a a 2 z ) ( a 2 z ) = a 3 z a 2 ( z a 2 z ) = a 3 z a 2 ( a z ) = 0 ,
as desired. □
We denote the preceding an element x in Theorem 2.3 by a e , g , and call it the generalized e-group inverse of a. Let A e , g denote the sets of all generalized e-group invertible elements in A .
Corollary 2.3. 
Let a A g . Then the following hold.
(1)
a e , g = a g a a e , g .
(2)
a a e , g = a m ( a e , g ) m for any m N .
Proof. 
These are obvious by the proof of Theorem 2.2. □
An element e A is positive if there exists an invertible b A such that e = b b . Evidently, an n × n complex matrix A is positive definite, i.e., every eigenvalue λ of A satisfies λ > 0 , if and only if it is a positive element in C n × n . We now derive
Theorem 2.4. 
Let a A and e A be positive. Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a A e , g .
(2)
There exists a unique element x A such that
x = a x 2 , ( a e a 2 x ) = a e a 2 x , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Proof. 
( 1 ) ( 2 ) In view of Theorem 2.2, there exists x A such that
x = a x 2 , ( a e a 2 x ) = a e a 2 x , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Now we assume that there exists y A such that
y = a y 2 , ( a e a 2 y ) = a e a 2 y , lim n | | a n y a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
As in the proof of Theorem 2.2, we see that ( a 2 x ) # = x and ( a 2 y ) # = y . Moreover, we have
x = a x 2 , ( a d ) e a 2 x = ( a d ) e a , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 ; y = a y 2 , ( a d ) e a 2 y = ( a d ) e a , lim n | | a n y a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Then
| | [ ( a 2 x ) e a 2 x ( a 2 x ) e a ] | | = | | [ ( a k x k 1 ) e a 2 x ( a k x k 1 ) e a ] | | = | | [ ( x k 1 ) ( a k ) e a 2 x ( a k x k 1 ) e a ] | | = | | [ ( x k 1 ) ( a d a k + 1 ) e a 2 x ( a k x k 1 ) e a + ( x k 1 ) ( a k a d a k + 1 ) e a 2 x ] | | = | | [ ( x k 1 ) ( a k + 1 ) ( a d ) e a 2 x ( a k x k 1 ) e a + ( x k 1 ) ( a k a d a k + 1 ) e a 2 x ] | | = | | [ ( x k 1 ) ( a k + 1 ) ( a d ) e a ( a k x k 1 ) e a + ( x k 1 ) ( a k a d a k + 1 ) e a 2 x ] | | = | | [ ( x k 1 ) ( a d a k + 1 a k ) e a + ( x k 1 ) ( a k a d a k + 1 ) e a 2 x ] | | | | ( e a ) | | | | x k 1 | | + | | x k 1 | | | | ( e a 2 x ) | | | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) | | .
In view of Lemma 2.1, we have
lim n | | [ ( a 2 x ) e a 2 x ( a 2 x ) e a ] | | 1 n = 0 .
Hence [ ( a 2 x ) e a 2 x ] = [ ( a 2 x ) e a ] , and then ( a 2 x ) e a 2 x = ( a 2 x ) e a . Likewise, we verify that
( a 2 x ) e a 2 y = ( a 2 x ) e a , ( a 2 y ) e a 2 x = ( a 2 y ) e a , ( a 2 y ) e a 2 y = ( a 2 y ) e a .
Let z = a 2 x a 2 y . Then we check that
z e z = ( a 2 x a 2 y ) e ( a 2 x a 2 y ) = ( a 2 x ) e a 2 x ( a 2 x ) e a 2 y ( a 2 y ) e a 2 x + ( a 2 y ) e a 2 y = ( a 2 x ) e a ( a 2 x ) e a ( a 2 y ) e a + ( a 2 y ) e a = 0 .
Write e = b b for an invertible b A . Then ( b z ) ( b z ) = z ( b b ) z = e e z = 0 . Since A is a proper Banach *-algebra, we deduce that b z = 0 ; hence, z = b 1 ( b z ) = 0 . This implies that a 2 x = a 2 y .
As in the proof in Theorem 2.2, we have x = x a x and y = y a y . Therefore
| | x y | | = | | x a x y a y | | = | | x a k + 1 x k + 1 y a k y k | | = | | ( x a k + 1 a k ) x k + 1 + a k x k + 1 y 2 a k + 1 y k + y ( y a k + 1 a k ) y k | | | | ( x a k + 1 a k ) x k + 1 | | + | | y ( y a k + 1 a k ) y k | | + | | a k x k + 1 y 2 a 2 y | | = | | ( x a k + 1 a k ) x k + 1 | | + | | y ( y a k + 1 a k ) y k | | + | | a k x k + 1 y 2 a 2 x | | = | | ( x a k + 1 a k ) x k + 1 | | + | | y ( y a k + 1 a k ) y k | | + | | a k 1 x k y 2 a k + 1 x k | | | | ( x a k + 1 a k ) x k + 1 | | + | | y ( y a k + 1 a k ) y k | | + | | ( a k 1 y a k ) x k + | | y ( a k y a k + 1 ) x k | | .
Hence,
| | x y | | 1 k | | x | | 1 + 1 k | | a k x a k + 1 | | 1 k + [ ( 1 + | | y | | ) | | x k | | + | | y | | k + 1 ] 1 k | | a k y a k + 1 | | 1 k .
This implies that lim n | | x y | | 1 k = 0 , and so x = y . That is, the preceding x is unique, as desired.
( 2 ) ( 1 ) This is obvious by Theorem 2.2. □
We say that a A has generalized group inverse if a A e , g for e = 1 , and use a g to stand for the unique element a 1 , g . Let C n × n be the Banach algebra of all n × n complex matrices, with conjugate transpose * as the involution. Evidently, C n × n has proper involution *. As is well known, ( C n × n ) q n i l = ( C n × n ) n i l . For any A C n × n , it follows by [22, Theorem 4.2] that the weak group inverse and generalized group inverse coincide with each other, i.e., A g = A W .
The Drazin inverse of a square complex matrix A is the unique matrix A D defined by A k = A k + 1 A D , A D = A D A A D and A A D = A D A , where k is the smallest non-negative integer such that r a n k ( A k ) = r a n k ( A k + 1 ) . We come now to provide a new characterization for the weak group inverse of a complex matrix.
Corollary 2.5. 
Let A , X C n × n . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
A has weak group inverse X.
(2)
There exist k N such that A k = X A k + 1 , X = A X 2 , ( A D ) A 2 X = ( A D ) A .
Proof. 
( 1 ) ( 2 ) Since A has weak group inverse X, there exist k N such that A k = X A k + 1 , X = A X 2 , ( A k ) A 2 X = ( A k ) A . Hence,
( A D ) A 2 X = [ A k ( A D ) k + 1 ] A 2 X = [ ( A D ) k + 1 ] ( A k ) A 2 X = [ ( A D ) k + 1 ] ( A k ) A = [ A k ( A D ) k + 1 ] A = ( A D ) A .
( 2 ) ( 1 ) By hypothesis, there exist k N such that A k = X A k + 1 , X = A X 2 , ( A D ) A 2 X = ( A D ) A . Hence, lim n | | A n X A n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 . In view of Theorem 2.2, A C n × n has generalized group inverse. Therefore A has weak group inverse X. □
Corollary 2.6. 
Let A C n × n . Then the matrix equation
( A D ) A 2 x = ( A D ) A b , b C n × 1
has solutions
x = A W b + ( I n A W A ) y
for any y C n × 1 .
Proof. 
Choose x = A W b + ( I n A W A ) y with a y C n × 1 . In light of Corollary 2.5, one directly checks that
( A D ) A 2 x = ( A D ) A 2 [ A W b + ( I n A W A ) y ] = [ ( A D ) A 2 A W ] b + [ ( A D ) A 2 [ ( A D ) A 2 A W A ] y = [ ( A D ) A ] b + [ ( A D ) A 2 ( ( A D ) A 2 A W ) A ] y = ( A D ) A b ,
as required. □

3. Characterizing the Generalized e-Group Inverse via g-Drazin Invertibility

This section is about characterizing the property of generalized e-group inverses through the g-Drazin invertibility. We now derive:
Theorem 3.1. 
Let a A . Then a A e , g if and only if
(1)
a A d ;
(2)
There exists x A such that
a x 2 = x , ( a e a 2 x ) = a e a 2 x , lim n | | a n a x a n | | 1 n = 0 .
In this case,
a d = n = 0 ( a e , g ) n + 1 ( a a a e , g a ) n [ 1 ( a a a e , g a ) ( a a a e , g a ) d ] , a e , g = a a d z , where a z 2 = z , ( a e a 2 z ) = a e a 2 z .
Proof. 
⟹ By hypothesis, there exists x A such that
x = a x 2 , ( a e a 2 x ) = a e a 2 x , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Step 1. We claim that
lim n | | a n a x a n | | 1 n + 1 = 0 .
| | a n a n x n a n | | 1 n = | | a n x a n + 1 + ( a x 2 ) a n + 1 a n x n a n | | 1 n = | | a n x a n + 1 + ( a n x n ) x a n + 1 a n x n a n | | 1 n | | a n x a n + 1 + ( a n x n ) x a n + 1 a n x n a n | | 1 n | | a n x a n + 1 ( a n x n ) ( a n x a n + 1 ) | | 1 n | | 1 a n x n | | 1 n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n ( 1 + | | a | | | | x | | ) | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n .
Since
lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0
and a x = a n x n , we prove that
lim n | | a n a x a n | | 1 n + 1 = 0 .
Set x = a z a and y = a a z a . By the proof of Theorem 2.2, we have a = x + y , x A # , y A q n i l , x e y = y x = 0 .
Clearly, y , x A d and y x = 0 . Since y d = 0 and x d = x # = z , it follows by [2, Corollary 3.4] that a = y + x has g-Drazin inverse and
a d = n = 0 z n + 1 y n y π = n = 0 ( a g ) n + 1 ( a a a e , g a ) n [ 1 ( a a a e , g a ) ( a a a e , g a ) d ] .
Since a d = n = 0 z n + 1 y n y π , we have a a d z = a z 2 = z . Moreover, ( a e a 2 z ) = a e a 2 z , as desired.
⟸ By hypothesis, there exists some z A such that
a z 2 = z , ( a e a 2 z ) = a e a 2 z , lim n | | a n a z a n | | 1 n = 0 .
Let x = a a d z . We claim that a e , g = x . One directly verifies that
| | a z a x | | = | | ( a a 2 a d ) z | | = | | ( a a 2 a d ) a z 2 | | = = | | ( a a 2 a d ) n z n | | | | ( a a 2 a d ) n | | | | z n | | ,
Then
lim n | | a z a x | | 1 n = 0 ;
hence, a x = a z , and so ( a e a 2 x ) = ( a e a 2 z ) = a e a 2 z = a e a 2 x .
x a x 2 = a a d z ( a x ) z = a a d z a z a a d z = ( a a d z a z 2 ) + a z ( 1 a a d ) z = ( a 2 a d z 2 a z 2 ) + a z ( 1 a a d ) z = ( a a d 1 ) a z 2 + a z ( 1 a a d ) z = ( a z 1 ) ( 1 a a d ) z .
Since z = a z 2 , by induction, we have x a x 2 = ( a z 1 ) ( 1 a a d ) a n z n + 1 , and so | | x a x 2 | | | | a z 1 | | | | ( a a 2 a d ) n | | | | z | | n + 1 . Since
lim n | | ( a a 2 a d ) n | | 1 n = 0 ,
we deduce that lim n | | x a x 2 | | 1 n = 0 . This implies that a x 2 = x .
Observing that
| | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = | | ( a n a n + 1 a d ) + ( a d a n a a d a n z n a n a ) | | 1 n | | a n a n + 1 a d | | 1 n + | | a d | | 1 n | | a n a n z n a n | | 1 n | | a | | 1 n ,
we have
lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
This completes the proof. □
Corollary 3.2. 
Let A C n × n . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
A has weak group inverse.
(2)
There exists X C n × n such that
A X 2 = X , ( A A 2 X ) = A A 2 X , lim n | | A n A X A n | | 1 n + 1 = 0 .
Proof. 
Since weak and generalized group inverses coincide with each other for a complex matrix, we obtain the result by Theorem 3.1. □
We are ready to prove:
Theorem 3.3. 
Let a A . Then a A e , g if and only if
(1)
a A d ;
(2)
There exists x A such that
( a e a 2 x ) = a e a 2 x , x A = a d A , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
In this case, a e , g = x .
Proof. 
⟹ Since a A e , g , it follows by Theorem 2.2 that a A d . Moreover, There exists x A such that
( a e a 2 x ) = a e a 2 x , a x 2 = x , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
In view of Theorem 2.2, a has the decomposition a = a 1 + a 2 , where a 1 e a 2 = a 2 a 1 = 0 , a 1 A # , a 2 A q n i l . Let x = a 1 # . Moreover, we have
x = a x 2 , ( a e a 2 x ) = a e a 2 x , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Since a 2 a 1 = 0 , a 1 a 1 π = 0 and a 2 d = 0 , it follows by [2, Corollary 3.4] that a A d and
a d = a 1 # + n = 1 ( a 1 # ) n + 1 a 2 n .
We verify that
a a d x = a d ( a 1 + a 2 ) a 1 # = a d a 1 a 1 # = [ a 1 # + n = 1 ( a 1 # ) n + 1 a 2 n ] a 1 a 1 # = a 1 # ( a 1 a 1 # ) = x .
Furthermore, we see that
x a a d = a 1 # ( a 1 + a 2 ) [ a 1 # + n = 1 ( a 1 # ) n + 1 a 2 n ] = a 1 # a 1 [ a 1 # + n = 1 ( a 1 # ) n + 1 a 2 n ] = a 1 # + n = 1 ( a 1 # ) n + 1 a 2 n = a d .
Therefore x A = a d A , as required.
⟸ We observe that
| | a x a d a d | | 1 n = | | a x a n + 1 ( a d ) n + 2 a a n ( a d ) n + 2 | | 1 n | | a | 1 n | | | a n x a n + 1 | 1 n | | | ( a d ) n + 2 | | 1 n .
Accordingly,
lim n | | a x a d a d | | 1 n = 0 .
Therefore we have a x a d = a d . By hypothesis, x A = a d A , and then 1 a x ( a d ) ( x ) . Hence ( 1 a x ) x = 0 , i.e., a x 2 = x . In light of Theorem 2.2, a A e , g . In this case, a e , g = x , as asserted. □
Corollary 3.4. 
Let A C n × n . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
A has weak group inverse.
(2)
There exist k N . X C n × n such that
A k = X A k + 1 , R ( X ) = R ( A D ) , ( A A 2 X ) = A A 2 X .
Proof. 
This is obvious by Theorem 3.3. □
Theorem 3.5. 
Let a A . Then a A e , g if and only if
(1)
a A d ;
(2)
There exists an idempotent q A such that
a d A = q A a n d a e a q = q a e a .
In this case, a e , g = a d q .
Proof. 
⟹ In view of Theorem 2.2, a A d . Let q = a a e , g . By virtue of Corollary 2.4, a e , g = a e , g a a e , g . Then q 2 = q , i.e., q A is an idempotent. We check that
a e a q = a e a 2 a e , g = ( a e a 2 a e , g ) = ( a e a q ) = q a e a .
In view of Theorem 3.1, a e , g = a a d z , where a z 2 = z and ( a e a 2 z ) = a e a 2 z . Then q = a a e , g = a ( a a d z ) = ( a a d ) ( a z ) . Hence, q A a a d A . By using Theorem 3.1 again,
a d = n = 0 ( a e , g ) n + 1 ( a a a e , g a ) n [ 1 ( a a a e , g a ) ( a a a e , g a ) d ] .
Hence, a a d = a a e , g y = q y for some y A . Then
a a d A q A .
Therefore q A = a d a A = a d A , as required.
⟸ By hypothesis, there exists an idempotent q A such that a d A = q A and a e a q = q a e a . Hence, q A = a a d A . Set x = a d q . Then a x = a a d q = q , and then ( a e a 2 x ) = ( a e a q ) = q a e a = a e a q = ( a e a ) ( a x ) = a e a 2 x . Moreover, we have a x 2 = ( a a d ) q a d q = q a d q = q ( a a d ) a d q = ( a a d ) a d q = a d q = x . We verify that
| | a n x a n + 1 | | = | | ( a n ( a d q ) a d a n + 2 ) [ x ( a n + 1 a d a n + 2 ) ] | | | | a n a d a n + 1 | | + | | x | | | | a n + 1 a d a n + 2 | | 1 + | | x | | | | a | | | | a n a d a n + 1 | | = 1 + | | x | | | | a | | | | a n ( 1 a d a ) n | | = 1 + | | x | | | | a | | | | ( a a d a 2 ) n | | .
Since a a d a 2 A q n i l , we have lim n | | ( a a d a 2 ) n | | 1 n = 0 . Therefore lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 . In view of Corollary 2.3, a A g . In this case, a g = a d q .
Corollary 3.6. 
Let a A . Then a A e , g if and only if
(1)
a A d ;
(2)
There exists an idempotent q A such that ( a d ) = ( q ) and a e a q = q a e a .
In this case, a d = a d q .
Proof. 
⟹ In view of Theorem 3.5, a A d and there exists an idempotent q A such that a d A = q A a n d a e a q = q a e a . We infer that ( a d ) = ( q ) , as desired.
⟸ By hypothesis, there exists an idempotent q A such that ( a d ) = ( q ) and a e a q = q a e a . Clearly, 1 a a d ( a d ) ( q ) ; hence, q = a a d q . This implies that q A a d A . Also we have 1 q ( q ) ( a d ) , and then a d = q a d . We infer that a d A q A . Therefore a d A = q A . In light of Theorem 3.5, a A d . In this case, a d = a d q .
Theorem 3.7. 
Let a A and e A be positive. Then a A g if and only if
(1)
a A d ;
(2)
There exists some element x A such that ( a d ) e a d x = ( a d ) e a .
In this case, a e , g = ( a d ) 3 x .
Proof. 
⟹ By virtue of Theorem 2.2, a A d and there exists z A such that
z = a z 2 , ( a d ) e a 2 z = ( a d ) e a , lim n | | a n z a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Choose x = a 3 z . Then we verify that
| | ( a d ) e a ( a d ) e a d x | | = | | ( a d ) e a ( a d ) e a d a 3 z | | = | | ( a d ) e a ( a d ) e a d a k + 1 z k 1 | | | | ( a d ) e a ( a d ) e a k z k 1 | | + | | ( a d ) e ( a k a d a k + 1 ) z k 1 | | | | ( a d ) e a ( a d ) e a 2 z | | + | | ( a d ) e | | | | a k a d a k + 1 | | | | z k 1 | | = | | ( a d ) e | | | | a k a d a k + 1 | | | | z k 1 | | .
Since lim k | | a k a d a k + 1 | | 1 k = 0 , we derive that lim k | | ( a d ) e a ( a d ) e a d x | | 1 k = 0 . Hence ( a d ) e a d x = ( a d ) e a , as required.
⟸ By hypothesis, ( a d ) e a d x = ( a d ) e a for some x A . Then ( a a d ) e a a d = a [ ( a d ) e a ] a d = a [ ( a d ) e a d x ] a d = ( a a d ) e a a d ( a d x a d ) . As e is positive, e = b b for an invertible b A . Then ( b a a d ) ( b a a d ) = ( a a d ) e a a d = ( b a a d ) ( b a a d ) ( a d x a d ) . Since the involution * is proper, we get b a a d = ( b a a d ) ( a d x a d ) ; hence, a a d = a ( a d ) 2 x a d = a d x a d . Choose y = ( a d ) 3 x . Then we verify that
a y 2 = a ( a d ) 3 x ( a d ) 3 x = ( a d ) 2 x ( a d ) 3 x = a d ( a d x a d ) ( a d ) 2 x = a d ( a a d ) ( a d ) 2 x = ( a d ) 3 x = y , ( a d ) e a 2 y = ( a d ) e a 2 ( a d ) 3 x = ( a d ) e a d x = ( a d ) e a .
Moreover, we see that
| | a k y a k + 1 | | = | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) + ( a d ) 2 a a d a k + 2 ( a d ) 3 x a k + 1 | | | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) | | + | | ( a d ) 2 a a d a k + 2 ( a d ) 3 x a k + 1 | | | | ( a k a d a k + 1 ) | | + | | ( a d ) 2 a d x a d a k + 2 ( a d ) 3 x a k + 1 | | | | a k a d a k + 1 | | + | | ( a d ) 3 x | | | | a k a d a k + 1 | | | | a | | = | | a k a d a k + 1 | | ( 1 + | | ( a d ) 3 x | | | | a | | ) .
Since lim k | | a k a d a k + 1 | | 1 k = 0 , we deduce that lim k | | a k y a k + 1 | | 1 k = 0 . In view of Theorem 2.2, a A e , g . In this case, a e , g = ( a d ) 3 x . This completes the proof. □
Corollary 3.8. 
Let a A and e A be positive. Then a A g if and only if
(1)
a A d ;
(2)
There exists an idempotent q A such that
a d A = q A a n d ( a d ) e a q = ( a d ) e a .
Proof. 
⟹ By using Theorem 3.5, a A d and there exists an idempotent q A such that a d A = q A a n d a e a q = q a e a . Explicit, q = a a e , g . We directly check that
q a a d = a a g a a d = a a d , a a d q = a a d a a g = q .
Furthermore, we obtain
( a d ) e a q = [ a ( a d ) 2 ] e a q = [ ( a d ) 2 ] ( a e a q ) = [ ( a d ) 2 ] ( q a e a ) = [ a q ( a d ) 2 ] e a = [ a ( q a a d ) ( a d ) 2 ] e a = [ a ( a a d ) ( a d ) 2 ] e a = ( a d ) e a .
We conclude that a d A = q A and ( a d ) a q = ( a d ) a , as required.
⟸ By hypothesis, there exists an idempotent q A such that a d A = q A a n d ( a d ) e a q = ( a d ) e a . Write q = a d z for an element z A . Choose x = a z . Then ( a d ) e a d x = ( a d ) e a d a z = ( a d ) e a q = ( a d ) e a , the result follows by Theorem 3.8. □

4. Polar-like and Generalized Weighted Core Inverse Properties

The objective of this section is to delve into the generalized weighted group inverse, incorporating its associated properties. We now proceed to elucidate the generalized e-group inverse through its characterization by the polar-like property.
Theorem 4.1. 
Let a A . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a A e , g .
(2)
a A d and there exists an idempotent p A such that
a + p A 1 , ( a e a p ) = a e a p a n d p a = p a p A q n i l .
(3)
a A d and there exists an idempotent p A such that
a + p A 1 , ( a d ) e a p = 0 a n d p a = p a p A q n i l .
Proof. 
( 1 ) ( 2 ) In view of Theorem 2.2, a A d . Since a R e , g , there exist z , y A such that
a = z + y , z e y = y z = 0 , z A # , y A q n i l .
Set x = z # . The we check that
a x = ( z + y ) z # = z z # , a x 2 = ( a x ) x = z ( z # ) 2 = z # = x , ( a e a 2 x ) = ( z e z ) = z e z = a e a 2 x .
Let p = 1 z z # . Then p = 1 a x = p 2 A . Furthermore, a a z z # = a ( 1 z z # ) = ( z + y ) ( 1 z z # ) = y A q n i l , and so p a = ( 1 z z # ) a = a z z # a A q n i l by Cline’s formula (see [10, Theorem 2.1]). Therefore we have
( a e a p ) = ( a e a a e a 2 x ) = a e a a a 2 x = a e a p .
Since p a ( 1 p ) = ( 1 z z # ) ( z + y ) z z # = 0 , we get p a = p a p . Obviously, z + 1 z z # = ( z # + 1 z z # ) 1 A 1 . Since y ( z # + 1 z z # ) = y A q n i l , it follows by Cline’s formula that ( z # + 1 z z # ) y A q n i l . Hence 1 + ( z # + 1 z z # ) y A 1 . This implies that a + p = z + y + 1 z z # = ( z + 1 z z # ) [ 1 + ( z # + 1 z z # ) 1 y ] A 1 , as desired.
( 2 ) ( 1 ) By hypothesis, there exists an idempotent p A such that
u : = a + p A 1 , ( a e a p ) = a e a p , p a = p a p A q n i l .
Set x = a ( 1 p ) and y = a p . Then a = x + y . Since p a = p a p A q n i l , we have y = a p A q n i l by Cline’s formula. We also see that p a ( 1 p ) = 0 , and then y x = a p a ( 1 p ) = 0 . Moreover, we have x e y = [ a ( 1 p ) ] e a p = ( 1 p ) ( a e a p ) = ( 1 p ) ( a e a p ) = [ a e a p ( 1 p ) ] = 0 . It will suffice to prove x A # .
Clearly, x = a ( 1 p ) = u ( 1 p ) . Let z = ( 1 p ) u 1 . Then we check that z x = 1 p ; hence, z x 2 = ( 1 p ) x = ( 1 p ) a ( 1 p ) = a ( 1 p ) = x . Since a A d , a p A d and p a ( 1 p ) = 0 , it follows by [21, Lemma 2.2] that x = a ( 1 p ) A d . Therefore x = z x 2 = z n x n + 1 = z n ( x n x d x n + 1 ) x + z n x d x n + 2 and x 2 x d = ( z x 2 ) x x d = z n x n + 2 x d . Then
| | x x 2 x d | | 1 n = | | z n ( x n x d x n + 1 ) x | | 1 n | | z n | | 1 n | | x n x d x n + 1 | | 1 n | | x | | 1 n .
Accordingly,
lim n | | x x 2 x d | | 1 n = 0 .
Therefore we have x = x 2 x d , and so x A # . Then a = x + y is a generalized e-group decomposition of a. In light of Theorem 2.2, a A e , g .
( 1 ) ( 3 ) Clearly, a A d . By hypothesis, a has the generalized e-group decomposition a = z + y . Let x = z # and p = 1 a x . As in the preceding discussion, we prove that a + p A 1 a n d p a = p a p A q n i l . Similarly to Theorem 2.2, we show that a A d and ( a d ) e a 2 x = ( a d ) e a . Therefore ( a d ) e a p = ( a d ) e a ( a d ) e a 2 x = 0 , as desired.
( 3 ) ( 1 ) By hypothesis, we have an idempotent p A such that
a + p A 1 , ( a d ) e a p = 0 a n d p a = p a p A q n i l .
Set x = a ( 1 p ) and y = a p . Then a = x + y . Analogously to the preceding discussion, we have y x = 0 , x A # and y A q n i l . By using Cline’s formula, a p A q n i l . Since p a ( 1 p ) = 0 , it follows by [21, Lemma 2.2] that a ( 1 p ) A d and [ a ( 1 p ) ] d = a d ( 1 p ) . Thus we verify that
x e y = ( x d x 2 ) e a p = ( x 2 ) ( x d ) e a p = ( x 2 ) ( 1 p ) [ ( a d ) e a p ] = 0 .
Hence a = x + y is a generalized e-group decomposition of a. According to Theorem 2.2, a A e , g . □
Corollary 4.2. 
Let A C n × n , with conjugate transpose * as the involution. Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
A has weak group inverse.
(2)
There exists an idempotent F C n × n such that A + F is invertible, ( A A F ) = A A F , A F = F A F is nilpotent.
(3)
There exists an idempotent F C n × n such that A + F is invertible, ( A D ) A F = 0 , A F = F A F is nilpotent.
Proof. 
As is well known, every complex has Drazin inverse. This completes the proof by Theorem 4.1. □
Example 4.3. 
Let C 2 × 2 be the Banach algebra of all 2 × 2 complex matrices, with transpose * as the involution. Let A = 1 0 i 0 C 2 × 2 . Then the equations A X 2 = X , ( A A 2 X ) = A A 2 X , lim n | | A n X A n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 has two solutions
X 1 = 1 0 i 0 , X 2 = 0 i 0 1 .
Then the solution of the preceding equations is not unique. Choose an idempotent F = 0 0 i 1 . Then A + F is invertible, ( A A F ) = A A F , A F = F A F is nilpotent. In this case, the involution ∗ is not proper.
Next, we turn our attention to the relationships between generalized group inverses and generalized weighted core inverses.
Theorem 4.4. 
Let a A e , d . Then a A e , g and a e , g = ( a a e , d a ) # = ( a e , d ) 2 a .
Proof. 
By hypothesis, we have
a e , d = a ( a e , d ) 2 , ( e a a e , d ) = e a a e , d and lim n | | a n a d a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Set x = ( a e , d ) 2 a . Then we check that
a x 2 = [ a ( a e , d ) 2 ] [ a ( a e , d ) 2 ] a = ( a e , d ) 2 a = x , ( a e a 2 x ) = ( a e a 2 ( a e , d ) 2 a ) = ( a e a a e , d a ) = a ( e a a d ) a = a ( e a a d ) a = a e a 2 x , | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = | | a n ( a e , d ) 2 a n + 2 | | 1 n = | | a n a e , d a n + 1 + ( a e , d ( a n a e , d a n + 1 ) a | | 1 n = | | a n a e , d a n + 1 | | 1 n + | | a e , d | | 1 n | | a n a e , d a n + 1 ) | | 1 n | | a | | 1 n = [ 1 + | | a e , d | | 1 n | | a | | 1 n ] | | a n a e , d a n + 1 | | 1 n .
Hence lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 . Therefore a e , g = ( a e , d ) 2 a .
Obviously, we have ( a e , d ) 2 a a a e , d a ( a e , d ) 2 a = ( a e , d ) 2 a a e , d a = ( a e , d ) 2 a . Moreover, we check that
| | a e , d a ( a e , d ) 2 a a a e , d a | | = | | a e , d a ( a e , d ) 2 a 2 a e , d a | | = | | a e , d a a e , d [ a e , d a n + 1 ] ( a e , d ) n a | | = | | [ a e , d a a e , d a n ( a e , d ) n a ] + a e , d [ a n a e , d a n + 1 ] ( a e , d ) n a | | = | | a e , d [ a n a e , d a n + 1 ] ( a e , d ) n a | | | | a e , d | | | | a n a e , d a n + 1 | | | | ( a e , d ) n | | | | a | | .
By hypothesis, a A e , d , and so lim n | | a n a e , d a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 . Therefore
lim n | | a e , d a ( a e , d ) 2 a a a e , d a | | 1 n = 0 .
Hence a e , d a = ( a e , d ) 2 a a a e , d a . Accordingly, a a e , d a ( a e , d ) 2 a = a e , d a = ( a e , d ) 2 a a a e , d a . On the other hand, we verify that
| | a e , d a 2 a e , d a a a e , d a | | = | | a e , d a n + 1 ( a e , d ) n a a a e , d a | | = | | ( a e , d a n + 1 a n ) ( a e , d ) n a + a n ( a e , d ) n a a a e , d a | | = | | ( a e , d a n + 1 a n ) ( a e , d ) n a | | | | a e , d a n + 1 a n | | | | a e , d | | n | | a | | .
Then
lim n | | a e , d a 2 a e , d a a a e , d a | | 1 n = 0 .
Hence a a e , d a ( a e , d ) 2 a a a e , d a = a e , d a a a e , d a = a a e , d a , and therefore ( a a e , d a ) # = ( a e , d ) 2 a . □
Theorem 4.4 implies the uniqueness of the generalized e-group inverse for any generalized e-core invertible Banach element. Let B ( X ) be the Banach algebra of bounded linear operators over a Hilbert space X. Then the algebra B ( X ) is a Banach algebra with the adjoint operation as its proper involution. Let A in B ( X ) d . In [15], Mosić and D. Zheng introduced and studied weak group inverse for a Hilbert space operator. The weak group inverse of A is defined by A = ( A d ) 2 A . By virtue of Theorem 4.4, the generalized group inverse and weak group inverse for a Hilbert space operator coincide with each other (see [15]).
Corollary 4.5. 
Let a A e , g . Then ( a e , g ) e , g = a 2 a e , g and [ ( a e , g ) e , g ] e , g = a e , g .
Proof. 
In view of Theorem 4.4, a e , g = ( a a e , d a ) # , and so a e , g has group inverse. Hence, we have ( a e , g ) e , g = ( a e , g ) # = [ ( a a e , d a ) # ] # = a a e , d a . Moreover, a a e , d a has group inverse, and then ( a e , g ) e , g e , g = [ a a e , d a ] e , g = [ a a e , d a ] # = a e , g . This completes the proof. □
Corollary 4.6. 
Let a A e , d . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a e , g = a e , d ;
(2)
a a e , d = a e , d a .
(3)
a a e , g = a a e , d .
Proof. 
( 1 ) ( 2 ) In view of Theorem 4.4, a e , g = ( a e , d ) 2 a . Hence, a a e , d = a a e , g = a ( a e , d ) 2 a = a e , d a .
( 2 ) ( 1 ) Since a a e , d = a e , d a , it follows by Theorem 4.4 that a e , g = ( a e , d ) 2 a = a e , d ( a e , d a ) = a e , d a a e , d = a e , d , as desired.
( 1 ) ( 3 ) This is trivial.
( 3 ) ( 1 ) By virtue of Theorem 4.4, we have a e , g = ( a e , d ) 2 a . Accordingly, we check that a e , g = ( a e , d ) 2 a = a a d ( a e , d ) 2 a = a d ( a a e , g ) = a d ( a a e , d ) = a e , d , as asserted. □
Corollary 4.7. 
Let a A e , d . Then a e , g = x i f   a n d   o n l y   i f a x 2 = x , a x = a e , d a .
Proof. 
⟹ In view of Theorem 4.4, a A e , g and x = a e , g = ( a e , d ) 2 a . Therefore a x 2 = x and a x = a ( a e , d ) 2 a = a e , d a , as required.
⟸ By hypotheses, a x 2 = x , a x = a e , d a . Then we have x = a x 2 = ( a x ) x = a e , d ( a x ) = ( a e , d ) 2 a . In light of Theorem 4.4, x = a e , g , as desired. □

References

  1. O.M. Baksalary and G. Trenkler, Core inverse of matrices, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 58(2010), 681–697.
  2. Castro-Gonzalez; J.J. Koliha, New additive results for the g-Drazin inverse, Proc. R. Soc. Edinb.Secr. A, 134(2004), 1085–1097.
  3. Chen, On m-generalized group inverse in Banach *-algebras, Mediterr. J. Math., 22(2025), . [CrossRef]
  4. Chen and M. Sheibani, Theory of Clean Rings and Matrices, World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ, 2023. [CrossRef]
  5. Chen and M. Sheibani, Properties of generalized weighted core inverses in Banach *-algebras, J. Algebra Appl., (2025) 2550358 (20 pages). [CrossRef]
  6. D.E. Fereyra; F.E. Levis; P. Moas; D. Mosic and V. Orquera, The E-relative m-weak group inverse, Revista de la Union Matematica Argentina, accepted. [CrossRef]
  7. D.E. Ferreyra; V. Orquera and N. Thome, A weak group inverse for rectangular matrices, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat., Ser. A Mat., 2019. [CrossRef]
  8. Y. Gao and J. Chen, Pseudo core inverses in rings with involution, Comm. Algebra, 46(2018), 38–50.
  9. T. Li and J. Chen, Characterizations of core and dual core inverses in rings with involution, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 66(2018), 717–730.
  10. Y. Liao; J. Chen and J. Cui, Cline’s formula for the generalized Drazin inverse, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 37(2014), 37–42.
  11. D. Mosić, Core-EP inverse in ring with involution, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 96(2020), 427–443.
  12. D. Mosić, Core-EP inverses in Banach algebras, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 69(2021), 2976–2989.
  13. D. Mosić; G. Dolinar and J. Marovt, EP-quasinilpotent decomposition and its generalions, RACSAM, 2021. [CrossRef]
  14. D. Mosić; P.S. Stanimirovic, Representations for the weak group inverse, Appl. Math. Comput., 397(2021), Article ID 125957, 19 p.
  15. D. Mosić and D. Zhang, Weighted weak group inverse for Hilbert space operators, Front. Math. China, 15(2020), 709–726.
  16. H. Wang, Core-EP decomposition and its applications, Linear Algebra Appl., 508(2016), 289–300.
  17. H. Wang; J. Chen, Weak group inverse, Open Math., 16(2018), 1218–1232.
  18. H. Wang and X. Liu, The weak group matrix, Aequationes Math., 93(2019), 1261–1273.
  19. Q. Xu; L. Wang and J. Wei, New characterizations of partial isometries in rings, Filomat, 37(2023), 883–889.
  20. S. Xu; J. Chen and X. Zhang, New characterizations for core inverses in rings with involution, Front. Math. China, 2017. [CrossRef]
  21. D. Zhang and D. Mosic, Explicit formulae for the generalized Drazin inverse of block matrices over a Banach algebra, Filomat, 32(2018), 5907–5917.
  22. M. Zhou; J. Chen and Y. Zhou, Weak group inverses in proper *-rings, J. Algebra Appl., 19(2020). [CrossRef]
  23. M. Zhou; J. Chen; Y. Zhou and N. Thome, Weak group inverses and partial isometries in proper *-rings, Linear Multilinear Algebra, 70(2021), 1–16.
  24. M. Zhou; J. Chen and N. Thome, New characterizations of weak group matrices, Filomat, 37(2023), 457–466.
  25. Y. Zhou; J. Chen and M. Zhou, m-Weak group inverses in a ring with involution, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat., Ser. A Mat., 115(2021), Paper No. 2, 12 p.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated