1. Introduction
A Banach algebra is called a Banach *-algebra if there exists an involution
satisfying
. Let
be a Banach *-algebra. An element
has group inverse provided that there exists
such that
Such
x is unique if exists, denoted by
, and called the group inverse of
a. As is well known, a square complex matrix
A has group inverse if and only if
. An element
has core inverse if there exists some
such that
If such
x exists, it is unique, and denote it by
. Let
represent the range space of a complex matrix
X. A square complex matrix
A has core inverse
if and only if
is a projection and
(see [
20]). Recently, Gao and Chen [
8] introduced the core-EP inverse as a generalization of core inverse. An element
has core-EP inverse if there exist
and
such that
If such
x exists, it is unique, and denote it by
. A square complex matrix
X is the core-EP inverse of
A if
where
m is the Drazin index of
A.
Recently, Wang and Chen (see [
17]) introduced and studied weak group inverse for a square complex matrix. A square complex matrix
A has weak group inverse
X if it satisfies the system of equations:
The preceding
X is unique and denoted by
. The involution * is proper if
for any
, e.g., in a Rickart *-algebra, the involution is always proper. Let
be the Banach algebra of all
complex matrices, with conjugate transpose * as the involution. Then the involution * is proper. In [
22], Zou et al. extend the notion of weak group inverse from complex matrices to elements in a ring with proper involution. We refer the reader for weak group inverse in [
7,
14,
18,
24,
25].
Recall that
has g-Drazin inverse (i.e., generalized Drazin inverse) if there exists
such that
Such
x is unique, if exists, and denote it by
. Here,
As is well known,
if and only if
is invertible. The generalized Drazin inverse plays an important role in matrix and operator theory (see [
4]). Recently, Mosić and Zhang introduced and studied weak group inverse for a Hilbert space operator
A in
(see [
15]).
The objective of this paper is to introduce and examine a novel class of generalized inverse, which acts as a seamless continuation of the weak group inverse applicable to complex matrices and operators in Hilbert spaces. In
Section 2, we unveil the generalized weighted group inverse by means of an innovative generalized weighted group decomposition. This method reveals a plethora of fresh properties pertaining to the weak group inverse for complex matrices and operators within Hilbert spaces. Let
be an invertible Hermitian element (i.e.,
is invertible).
Definition 1.1.
An element has generalized e-group decomposition if there exist such that
We prove that
has generalized
e-group decomposition if and only if there exists a
such that
The element
x is called the generalized
e-group inverse of
a, and we denote it by
.
In
Section 3, we characterize generalized weighted group inverse by using the generalized Drazin invertibility. We prove that
has generalized
e-group inverse if and only if
and the equation
is solvable in
Evidently,
has g-Drazin inverse if and only if it has quasi-polar property, i.e., there exists an idempotent
such that
(see [
4], [Theorem 6.4.8]). An element
has generalized
e-core inverse if there exists
such that
Such
x is unique, if it exists, and we denote it by
(see [
5]). Evidently, the generalized
e-core inverse and core-EP inverse in [
11,
13] for a Hilbert space operator coincide with each other. In the final section, we present polar-like and generalized
e-core properties for the generalized weighted group inverse. These also provided new properties of weak group inverse for Hilbert space operators (see [
15]).
Throughout the paper, all Banach algebras are complex with a proper involution *. We use and to denote the sets of all invertible, group invertible, g-Drazin invertible, generalized e-core invertible, core-EP invertible and weak group invertible in , respectively.
2. Generalized e-Group Inverse
The purpose of this section is to introduce a new generalized inverse that serves as a natural extension of the weak group inverse in a Banach *-algebra. We begin with the following lemma.
Lemma 2.1. Let . Then
Proof. Let
. Then
. For any
, we have
, and so
. This implies that
. We easily check that
Since
we have
□
Theorem 2.2. Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
has generalized e-group decomposition.
- (2)
There exists
such that
- (3)
and there exists
such that
Proof.
By hypothesis, a has the generalized e-group decomposition . Let . Then .
Since
, we have
, and then
Since
, we have
. Hence
Since
and
, it follows by [
2, Corollary 3.4] that
and
Then
hence,
. Accordingly,
By hypothesis, there exists
such that
Let
and
. Then we check that
Then
Therefore
, and then
.
Moreover, we have
Then
By using Lemma 2.1, we have
; whence,
.
We check that
Hence
. Clearly,
. Then we have
. Accordingly,
, as required.
By hypotheses, we have
such that
For any
, we have
. Thus, we prove that
Hence,
This implies that
whence,
.
Set
and
Then
. We check that
Therefore
Since
we derive that
This implies that
.
We claim that
x has group inverse. Evidently, we verify that
Hence,
We check that
Accordingly,
This implies that
. By using Cline’s formula (see [
10], Theorem 2.1),
. Moreover, we see that
as desired. □
We denote the preceding an element x in Theorem 2.3 by , and call it the generalized e-group inverse of a. Let denote the sets of all generalized e-group invertible elements in .
Corollary 2.3. Let . Then the following hold.
- (1)
.
- (2)
for any .
Proof. These are obvious by the proof of Theorem 2.2. □
An element is positive if there exists an invertible such that . Evidently, an complex matrix A is positive definite, i.e., every eigenvalue of A satisfies , if and only if it is a positive element in . We now derive
Theorem 2.4. Let and be positive. Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
There exists a unique element
such that
Proof.
In view of Theorem 2.2, there exists
such that
Now we assume that there exists
such that
As in the proof of Theorem 2.2, we see that
and
. Moreover, we have
Then
In view of Lemma 2.1, we have
Hence
, and then
. Likewise, we verify that
Let
. Then we check that
Write
for an invertible
. Then
. Since
is a proper Banach *-algebra, we deduce that
; hence,
. This implies that
.
As in the proof in Theorem 2.2, we have
and
. Therefore
Hence,
This implies that
and so
. That is, the preceding
x is unique, as desired.
This is obvious by Theorem 2.2. □
We say that
has generalized group inverse if
for
, and use
to stand for the unique element
. Let
be the Banach algebra of all
complex matrices, with conjugate transpose * as the involution. Evidently,
has proper involution *. As is well known,
. For any
, it follows by [
22, Theorem 4.2] that the weak group inverse and generalized group inverse coincide with each other, i.e.,
.
The Drazin inverse of a square complex matrix A is the unique matrix defined by and , where k is the smallest non-negative integer such that . We come now to provide a new characterization for the weak group inverse of a complex matrix.
Corollary 2.5. Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
A has weak group inverse X.
- (2)
There exist such that
Proof.
Since
A has weak group inverse
X, there exist
such that
Hence,
By hypothesis, there exist such that Hence, In view of Theorem 2.2, has generalized group inverse. Therefore A has weak group inverse X. □
Corollary 2.6.
Let . Then the matrix equation
has solutions
for any .
Proof. Choose
with a
. In light of Corollary 2.5, one directly checks that
as required. □
3. Characterizing the Generalized e-Group Inverse via g-Drazin Invertibility
This section is about characterizing the property of generalized e-group inverses through the g-Drazin invertibility. We now derive:
Theorem 3.1. Let . Then if and only if
- (1)
;
- (2)
There exists
such that
Proof. ⟹ By hypothesis, there exists
such that
Step 1. We claim that
Since
and
, we prove that
Set and . By the proof of Theorem 2.2, we have .
Clearly,
and
. Since
and
, it follows by [
2, Corollary 3.4] that
has g-Drazin inverse and
Since
, we have
. Moreover,
, as desired.
⟸ By hypothesis, there exists some
such that
Let
. We claim that
. One directly verifies that
Then
hence,
, and so
.
Since
, by induction, we have
, and so
. Since
we deduce that
This implies that
.
Observing that
we have
This completes the proof. □
Corollary 3.2. Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
A has weak group inverse.
- (2)
There exists
such that
Proof. Since weak and generalized group inverses coincide with each other for a complex matrix, we obtain the result by Theorem 3.1. □
We are ready to prove:
Theorem 3.3. Let . Then if and only if
- (1)
;
- (2)
-
There exists
such that
In this case, .
Proof. ⟹ Since
, it follows by Theorem 2.2 that
. Moreover, There exists
such that
In view of Theorem 2.2,
a has the decomposition
, where
Let
. Moreover, we have
Since
and
, it follows by [
2, Corollary 3.4] that
and
We verify that
Furthermore, we see that
Therefore
, as required.
⟸ We observe that
Accordingly,
Therefore we have
. By hypothesis,
, and then
. Hence
, i.e.,
. In light of Theorem 2.2,
. In this case,
, as asserted. □
Corollary 3.4. Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
A has weak group inverse.
- (2)
There exist
such that
Proof. This is obvious by Theorem 3.3. □
Theorem 3.5. Let . Then if and only if
- (1)
;
- (2)
There exists an idempotent
such that
In this case,
Proof. ⟹ In view of Theorem 2.2,
. Let
. By virtue of Corollary 2.4,
Then
, i.e.,
is an idempotent. We check that
In view of Theorem 3.1,
, where
and
Then
Hence,
. By using Theorem 3.1 again,
Hence,
for some
. Then
Therefore
, as required.
⟸ By hypothesis, there exists an idempotent
such that
and
Hence,
. Set
. Then
, and then
. Moreover, we have
We verify that
Since , we have Therefore In view of Corollary 2.3, . In this case, □
Corollary 3.6. Let . Then if and only if
- (1)
;
- (2)
There exists an idempotent such that and
In this case,
Proof. ⟹ In view of Theorem 3.5, and there exists an idempotent such that We infer that , as desired.
⟸ By hypothesis, there exists an idempotent such that and Clearly, ; hence, . This implies that Also we have , and then . We infer that . Therefore . In light of Theorem 3.5, . In this case, □
Theorem 3.7. Let and be positive. Then if and only if
- (1)
;
- (2)
There exists some element such that
In this case,
Proof. ⟹ By virtue of Theorem 2.2,
and there exists
such that
Choose
. Then we verify that
Since
, we derive that
Hence
as required.
⟸ By hypothesis,
for some
. Then
. As
e is positive,
for an invertible
. Then
. Since the involution * is proper, we get
; hence,
. Choose
. Then we verify that
Moreover, we see that
Since
, we deduce that
In view of Theorem 2.2,
. In this case,
This completes the proof. □
Corollary 3.8. Let and be positive. Then if and only if
- (1)
;
- (2)
There exists an idempotent
such that
Proof. ⟹ By using Theorem 3.5,
and there exists an idempotent
such that
Explicit,
. We directly check that
Furthermore, we obtain
We conclude that
and
as required.
⟸ By hypothesis, there exists an idempotent such that Write for an element . Choose . Then , the result follows by Theorem 3.8. □
4. Polar-like and Generalized Weighted Core Inverse Properties
The objective of this section is to delve into the generalized weighted group inverse, incorporating its associated properties. We now proceed to elucidate the generalized e-group inverse through its characterization by the polar-like property.
Theorem 4.1. Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
and there exists an idempotent such that
- (3)
and there exists an idempotent such that
Proof.
In view of Theorem 2.2,
. Since
, there exist
such that
Set
. The we check that
Let
. Then
. Furthermore,
, and so
by Cline’s formula (see [
10, Theorem 2.1]). Therefore we have
Since
, we get
. Obviously,
. Since
, it follows by Cline’s formula that
. Hence
. This implies that
as desired.
By hypothesis, there exists an idempotent
such that
Set
and
. Then
. Since
, we have
by Cline’s formula. We also see that
, and then
. Moreover, we have
. It will suffice to prove
.
Clearly,
. Let
. Then we check that
; hence,
. Since
and
, it follows by [
21, Lemma 2.2] that
. Therefore
and
. Then
Accordingly,
Therefore we have
, and so
. Then
is a generalized
e-group decomposition of
a. In light of Theorem 2.2,
.
Clearly, . By hypothesis, a has the generalized e-group decomposition . Let and . As in the preceding discussion, we prove that Similarly to Theorem 2.2, we show that and Therefore , as desired.
By hypothesis, we have an idempotent
such that
Set
and
. Then
. Analogously to the preceding discussion, we have
and
. By using Cline’s formula,
. Since
, it follows by [
21, Lemma 2.2] that
and
. Thus we verify that
Hence
is a generalized
e-group decomposition of
a. According to Theorem 2.2,
. □
Corollary 4.2. Let , with conjugate transpose * as the involution. Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
A has weak group inverse.
- (2)
There exists an idempotent such that is invertible, is nilpotent.
- (3)
There exists an idempotent such that is invertible, is nilpotent.
Proof. As is well known, every complex has Drazin inverse. This completes the proof by Theorem 4.1. □
Example 4.3.
Let be the Banach algebra of all complex matrices, with transpose * as the involution. Let . Then the equations has two solutions
Then the solution of the preceding equations is not unique. Choose an idempotent . Then is invertible, is nilpotent. In this case, the involution ∗ is not proper.
Next, we turn our attention to the relationships between generalized group inverses and generalized weighted core inverses.
Theorem 4.4. Let . Then and
Proof. By hypothesis, we have
Set
. Then we check that
Hence
Therefore
Obviously, we have
Moreover, we check that
By hypothesis,
, and so
Therefore
Hence
Accordingly,
On the other hand, we verify that
Then
Hence
and therefore
. □
Theorem 4.4 implies the uniqueness of the generalized
e-group inverse for any generalized
e-core invertible Banach element. Let
be the Banach algebra of bounded linear operators over a Hilbert space
X. Then the algebra
is a Banach algebra with the adjoint operation as its proper involution. Let
A in
. In [
15], Mosić and D. Zheng introduced and studied weak group inverse for a Hilbert space operator. The weak group inverse of
A is defined by
. By virtue of Theorem 4.4, the generalized group inverse and weak group inverse for a Hilbert space operator coincide with each other (see [
15]).
Corollary 4.5. Let . Then and
Proof. In view of Theorem 4.4, , and so has group inverse. Hence, we have Moreover, has group inverse, and then This completes the proof. □
Corollary 4.6. Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
;
- (2)
.
- (3)
.
Proof.
In view of Theorem 4.4, Hence, .
Since , it follows by Theorem 4.4 that as desired.
This is trivial.
By virtue of Theorem 4.4, we have Accordingly, we check that as asserted. □
Corollary 4.7. Let . Then
Proof. ⟹ In view of Theorem 4.4, and . Therefore and , as required.
⟸ By hypotheses, . Then we have . In light of Theorem 4.4, , as desired. □