Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Weighted m-Generalized Group Inverse in Banach Algebras

Submitted:

16 August 2025

Posted:

20 August 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
We introduce the w-weighted m-generalized group inverse, extending the concept of the W-weighted m-weak group inverse from complex matrices to elements in a Banach algebra. We establish its fundamental properties, representations, and investigate related (weighted) m-generalized core inverses. By employing a limit-based approach, we extend the core theory of generalized inverses to a significantly broader context, establishing a foundational tool for future research in infinite-dimensional settings.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Let A be a Banach algebra. An element a A has group inverse provided that there exists x A such that
x a 2 = a , a x 2 = x , a x = x a .
Such x is unique if exists, denoted by a # , and called the group inverse of a (see [14]). As is well known, a square complex matrix A has group inverse if and only if r a n k ( A ) = r a n k ( A 2 ) .
A Banach algebra is called a Banach *-algebra if there exists an involution : x x satisfying ( x + y ) = x + y , ( λ x ) = λ ¯ x , ( x y ) = y x , ( x ) = x . The involution * is proper if x x = 0 x = 0 for any x A , e.g., in a Rickart *-algebra, the involution is always proper. Let C n × n be the Banach algebra of all n × n complex matrices, with conjugate transpose * as the involution. Then the involution * is proper. In [21], Zou et al. extended the notion of weak group inverse from complex matrices to elements in a ring with proper involution.
Let A be a Banach algebra with a proper involution *. An element a in a A has weak group inverse if there exists x A such that
x = a x 2 , ( a a 2 x ) = a a 2 x , a n = x a n + 1
for som n N . Such x is unique if it exists and is called the weak group inverse of a. We denote it by a (see [21,22]). A square complex matrix A has weak group inverse X if it satisfies the system of equations:
A X 2 = X , A X = A A .
Here, A is the core-EP inverse of A (see [11,13]). Weak group inverse was extensively studied by many authors, e.g., [8,17,20,21,22].
In [1], the authors extended weak group inverse and introduced generalized group inverse in a Banach algebra with proper involution. An element a in A has generalized group inverse if there exists x A such that
x = a x 2 , ( a a 2 x ) = a a 2 x , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Such x is unique if it exists and is called the generalized group inverse of a. We denote it by a . Many properties of generalized group inverse were presented in [1]. Mosić and Zhang introduced and studied weighted weak group inverse for a Hilbert space operator A in B ( X ) (see [17]). Furthermore, the weak group inverse was generalized to the m-weak group inverse (see [11,18,24]). Recently, Gao et al. further introduced and studied the W-weighted m-weak group inverse in [11].
The main purpose of this paper is to extend the concept of W-weighted m-weak group inverse for complex matrices to elements in a Banach *-algebra. This extension is called weighted m-generalized group inverse.
An element a A has generalized w-Drazin inverse x if there exists unique x A such that
a w x = x w a , x w a w x = x and a a w x w a A q n i l .
We denote x by a d , w (see [19]). Here, A q n i l = { x A lim n x n 1 n = 0 } . We denote a d , 1 by a d . Evidently, a d , w = x if and only if x = a [ ( w a ) d ] 2 . We introduce a new weighted generalized inverse as follows:
Definition 1.1. 
An element a A has w-weighted m-generalized group inverse if a A d , w and there exists x A such that
x = a ( w x ) 2 , [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 w x = [ ( w a ) d ] w a , lim n | | ( a w ) n ( x w ) ( a w ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
The preceding x is called the w-weighted m-generalized group inverse of a, and denoted by a m , w .
The w-weighted m-generalized group inverse is a natural generalization of the m-generalized group inverse which was introduced in [4]. Let a m be the m-generalized group inverse of a. Evidently, a m = a m , 1 . We list some characterizations of m-generalized group inverse.
Theorem 1.2. 
(see [4] [Theorem 2.3, Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 4.1]) Let A be a Banach *-algebra, and let a A . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a A m .
(2)
There exist x , y A such that
a = x + y , x a m 1 y = y x = 0 , x A # , y A q n i l .
(3)
a A d and there exists x A such that
x = a x 2 , ( a d ) a m + 1 x = ( a d ) a m , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
(4)
a A d and there exists x A such that
x = a x 2 , ( a d ) a m + 1 x = ( a d ) a m , lim n | | a n x a n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
(5)
a A d and there exists an idempotent p A such that
a + p A 1 , [ ( a m ) a m p ] = a a p a n d p a = p a p A q n i l .
(6)
a A d and there exists x A such that ( a d ) a d x = ( a d ) a m .
In Section 2, we investigate elementary properties of w-weighted m-generalized group inverse in a Banach *-algebra. Many new properties of the weak group inverse for a complex matrix and Hilbert space operator are thereby obtained.
Following [2], an element a in A has generalized w-core-EP inverse if there exist x A such that
a ( w x ) 2 = x , ( w a w x ) = w a w x , lim n | | ( a w ) n ( x w ) ( a w ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
The preceding x is unique if exists, and we denote it by a , w . We denote a , 1 by a . Evidently, a , w = x if and only if x = a [ ( w a ) ] 2 (see [2] [Theorem 2.1]). In Section 3, we investigate the representations of m-generalized group inverse under weighted generalized core-EP invertibility.
Recall that an element a A has Moore-Penrose inverse if there exist x A such that a x a = a , x a x = x , ( a x ) = a x , ( x a ) = x a . The preceding x is unique if it exists, and we denote it by a . An element a in A has weak core inverse provided that a A A (see [16,23]). In [3], the authors introduced and studied the generalized core inverse. The m-weak core inverse and weighted weak core inverse were investigated in [10,15]. Recently, Ferreyra and Mosić introduced the W-weighted m-weak core inverse for complex matrices which generalized the (weighted) core-EP inverse, the weak group inverse and m-weak core inverse (see [7]). A square complex matrix A has W-weighted m-weak core inverse X if
X = A m , W ( W A ) m [ ( W A ) m ] .
Here, A m , W is the W-weighted m-weak group inverse of A, i.e., ( W A ) m has weak group inverse (see [20]). Let a , w A , m N . Set a A m , w if ( w a ) m A . We have
Definition 1.3. 
An element a A has w-weighted m-generalized core inverse if a A m , w A m , w .
In Section 4, We present various properties, presentations of such weighted generalized group inverse combined with weighted Moore-Penrose inverse. We extend the properties of generalized core inverse in Banach *-algebra to the general case(see [3]). Many properties of the W-weighted m-weak core inverse are thereby extended to wider cases, e.g. Hilbert operators over an infinitely dimensional space.
Finally, in Section 5, we give the applications of the w-weighted m-generalized group (core) inverse in solving the matrix equations.
Throughout the paper, all Banach algebras are complex with a proper involution *. We use A , A d , w , A , A and A to denote the sets of all Moore-Penrose invertible, weighted generalized Drazin invertible, generalized core-EP invertible, generalized group invertible and weak group invertible elements in A , respectively.

2. Weighted m -Generalized Group Inverse

In this section we introduce and establish elementary properties of weighted m-generalized group inverse which will be used in the next section. This also extend the concept of w-weighted m-weak group inverse from complex matrices to elements in a Banach algebra (see [11]). We begin with
Theorem 2.1. 
Let a , w A . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a A m , w .
(2)
w a A m .
In this case, a m , w = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 .
Proof. 
( 1 ) ( 2 ) By hypothesis, we can find x A such that
x = a ( w x ) 2 , [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 w x = [ ( w a ) d ] w a , lim n | | ( a w ) n 1 ( x w ) ( a w ) n | | 1 n 1 = 0 .
Furthermore, we have
| | ( w a ) n ( w x ) ( w a ) n + 1 | | 1 n = | | w ( a w ) n 1 a w x w ( a w ) n a | | 1 n = | | w [ ( a w ) n 1 x w ( a w ) n ] a | | 1 n | | w | | 1 n [ | | ( a w ) n 1 x w ( a w ) n | | 1 n 1 ] n 1 n | | a | | 1 n .
Therefore
lim n | | ( w a ) n ( w x ) ( w a ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Obviously, w x = ( w a ) ( w x ) 2 . Hence,
w a A m a n d ( w a ) m = w x .
Accordingly,
x = a ( w x ) 2 = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ,
as desired.
( 2 ) ( 1 ) Let x = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 . Then a A d , w and we verify that
a ( w x ) 2 = a w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 = x .
One easily checks that
[ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 w x = [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 = [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 ( w a ) m = [ ( w a ) d ] w a .
Since
( x w ) ( a w ) n + 1 = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 w ( a w ) n + 1 = ( a w ) n a [ ( w a ) n 1 ( w a ) m ( w a ) n ] w a ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) n ( w a ) m ( w a ) n + 1 ] w ,
we have
| | ( a w ) n ( x w ) ( a w ) n + 1 | | 1 n | | a | | 1 n | | ( w a ) n 1 ( w a ) m ( w a ) n | | 1 n | | w | | 1 n + | | a ( w a ) m | | 1 n | | ( w a ) n ( w a ) m ( w a ) n + 1 | | 1 n | | w | | 1 n .
Therefore
lim n | | ( a w ) n ( x w ) ( a w ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 ,
the result follows. □
The preceding unique solution x is called the w-weighted generalized m-group inverse of a, and denote it by a m , w . That is, a m , w = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 . We use A m , w to denote the set of all w-weighted generalized m-group invertible elements in A . By the argument above, we have
Corollary 2.2. 
Let a , w A . Then
(1)
a m , w = x .
(2)
w a A m and ( w a ) m = w x .
Corollary 2.3. 
Let a , w A . Then a A m , w if and only if
(1)
a A d , w ;
(2)
There exists x A such that
x = a [ w x ] 2 , [ ( w a ) ( w a ) m + 1 w x ] = ( w a ) ( w a ) m + 1 w x , lim n | | ( a w ) n ( x w ) ( a w ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Proof. 
⟹ Obviously, a A d , w . By hypothesis, there exists x A such that
x = a [ w x ] 2 , [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 w x = [ ( w a ) d ] w a , lim n | | ( a w ) n ( x w ) ( a w ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
In this case, x = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 . Then
( w a ) ( w a ) m + 1 w x = ( w a ) ( w a ) m + 1 w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 = ( w a ) ( w a ) m + 1 ( w a ) m , ( w a ) ( w a ) m + 1 w x = ( w a ) ( w a ) m + 1 w x .
⟸ By hypothesis, there exists x A such that
x = a [ w x ] 2 , [ ( w a ) ( w a ) m + 1 w x ] = ( w a ) ( w a ) m + 1 w x , lim n | | ( a w ) n ( x w ) ( a w ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Clearly, w x = ( w a ) [ w x ] 2 . Observing that
| | ( w a ) n + 1 ( w x ) ( w a ) n + 2 | | = | | w ( a w ) n ( w ( x w ) ( a w ) n + 1 a | | | | w | | | | ( a w ) n ( x w ) ( a w ) n + 1 | | | | a | | ,
we see that
lim n | | ( w a ) n ( w x ) ( w a ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
This implies that w a A m . According to Theorem 2.1, a A m , w , as asserted. □
Theorem 2.4. 
Let a , w A . Then a A m , w if and only if
(1)
a A d , w ;
(2)
There exists x A such that
x = a [ w x ] 2 , [ ( ( w a ) m ) ( w a ) m + 1 w x ] = ( ( w a ) m ) ( w a ) m + 1 w x , lim n | | ( a w ) n ( x w ) ( a w ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Proof. 
⟹ Clearly, a A d , w . In view of Theorem 2.1, w a A m . According to Theorem 1.2, There exists z A such that
z = ( w a ) z 2 , [ ( ( w a ) m ) ( w a ) m + 1 z ] = ( ( w a ) m ) ( w a ) m + 1 z , lim n | | ( w a ) n z ( w a ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Here, z = ( w a ) m = w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 . Set x = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 . Then
[ ( ( w a ) m ) ( w a ) m + 1 w z ] = ( ( w a ) m ) ( w a ) m + 1 w z , lim n | | ( a w ) n ( z w ) ( a w ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Moreover, we have
w x = w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 = ( w a ) m ,
and then
a ( w x ) 2 = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 = x .
In this case, a m , w = x , as desired.
⟸ By hypothesis, there exists x A such that
x = a ( w x ) 2 , [ ( ( w a ) m ) ( w a ) m + 1 w x ] = ( ( w a ) m ) ( w a ) m + 1 w x , lim n | | ( a w ) n ( x w ) ( a w ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Then w x = w a ( w x ) 2 . In view of Theorem 1.2, w a A m . According to Theorem 2.1, a A m , w , as asserted. □
Corollary 2.5. 
Let a , w A . Then a A , w if and only if
(1)
a A D , w ;
(2)
There exists x A such that
x = a [ w x ] 2 , [ ( w a ) ( w a ) 2 w x ] = ( w a ) ( w a ) 2 w x , lim n | | ( a w ) n ( x w ) ( a w ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
Proof. 
This is obvious by Theorem 2.4. □
Set i m ( x ) = { x r r A } . We are ready to prove:
Theorem 2.6. 
Let a , w A . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a m , w = x .
(2)
a w x = a ( w a ) m , a ( w x ) 2 = x .
(3)
w a w x = w a ( w a ) m , i m ( x ) i m ( a w ) d .
(4)
a w x = a ( w a ) m , i m ( x ) i m ( a w ) d .
Proof. 
( 1 ) ( 2 ) In view of Theorem 2.1, x = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 . Then a ( w x ) 2 = x and
a w x = ( a w ) a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 = a ( w a ) [ ( w a ) m ] 2 = a ( w a ) m .
( 2 ) ( 3 ) Obviously, w a w x = w ( a w x ) = w [ a ( w a ) m ] = w a ( w a ) m . Moreover, we have
x = a ( w x ) 2 = ( a w x ) w x = a ( w a ) m w x = a ( w a ) d ( w a ) ( w a ) m w x = a [ ( w a ) d ] 2 w ( a w a ) ( w a ) m w x = ( a w ) d ( a w a ) ( w a ) m w x .
Therefore i m ( x ) i m ( a w ) d , as desired.
( 3 ) ( 4 ) Since i m ( x ) i m ( a w ) d , we see that
a w x = a w [ ( a w ) ( a w ) d x ] = ( a w ) d a [ w a w x ] = ( a w ) d a [ w a ( w a ) m ] = a [ ( w a ) d ] 2 ( w a ) 2 ( w a ) m = a w a ) ( w a ) d ( w a ) m = a ( w a ) m ,
as desired.
( 4 ) ( 1 ) Write x = ( a w ) d z for some z R . Then
x = a w ( a w ) d x = ( a w ) d ( a w x ) = ( a w ) d [ a ( w a ) m ] = ( a w ) d ( a w ) a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 .
This completes the proof by Theorem 2.1. □
Corollary 2.7. 
Let a A . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a m = x .
(2)
a x = a a m , a x 2 = x .
(3)
a x = a a m , i m ( x ) i m ( a d ) .
Proof. 
This is a direct consequence of Theorem 2.6. □
We are ready to prove:
Theorem 2.8. 
Let a A m , w . Then w a w a m + 1 , w = w a m , w w a .
Proof. 
In view of Theorem 2.1, we see that
w a w a m + 1 , w = w a w a [ ( w a ) m + 1 ] 2 = w a ( w a ) m + 1 w a m , w w a = w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 w a = ( w a ) m w a .
In view of [4] [Corollary 2.4], we have
( w a ) m + 1 = [ ( w a ) m ] 2 w a .
Therefore
w a w a m + 1 , w = w a ( w a ) m + 1 = w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 w a = ( w a ) m w a = w a m , w w a .
This completes the proof. □
Corollary 2.9. 
Let a A m . Then a a m + 1 = a m a .
Proof. 
This is obvious by choosing w = 1 in Theorem 2.8. □

3. Representations of m -Generalized Group Inverse

In this section, we present the representations of m-generalized group inverse under weighted generalized core-EP invertibility.
Theorem 3.1. 
Let a A , w . Then a A m , w and
a m , w = [ a , w w ] m + 1 ( a w ) m 1 a .
Proof. 
In view of [2] [Theorem 2.1], a , w = a [ ( w a ) ] 2 ; hence, w a , w = ( w a ) . Then we easily check that
[ a , w w ] m + 1 ( a w ) m 1 a = a , w [ w a , w ] m w ( a w ) m 1 a = a , w [ ( w a ) ] m ( w a ) m = a [ ( w a ) ] 2 [ ( w a ) ] m ( w a ) m = a [ ( w a ) ] m + 2 ( w a ) m .
Thus,
w [ a , w w ] m + 1 ( a w ) m 1 a = w a [ ( w a ) ] m + 2 ( w a ) m = [ ( w a ) ] m + 1 ( w a ) m .
Set x = [ ( w a ) ] m + 1 ( w a ) m . Then
( w a ) x 2 = ( w a ) [ ( w a ) ] m + 1 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) ] m + 1 ( w a ) m = ( w a ) [ ( w a ) ] m + 1 ( w a ) ( w a ) m = [ ( w a ) ] m + 1 ( w a ) m = x , ( ( w a ) d ) ( w a ) m + 1 x = ( ( w a ) d ) ( w a ) m + 1 [ ( w a ) ] m + 1 ( w a ) m = ( ( w a ) d ) ( w a ) ( w a ) ( w a ) m = ( ( w a ) d ) [ ( w a ) ( w a ) ] ( w a ) m = [ ( w a ) ( ( w a ) ) 2 ] ( w a ) m = ( ( w a ) d ) ( w a ) m , lim n | | ( w a ) n x ( w a ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 .
This implies that
( w a ) m = [ ( w a ) ] m + 1 ( w a ) m .
According to Theorem 2.1, we prove that a A m , w and
a m , w = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 = a [ ( ( w a ) ) m + 1 ( w a ) m ] 2 = a [ ( ( w a ) ) m + 1 ( w a ) m ] [ ( ( w a ) ) m + 1 ( w a ) m ] = a ( ( w a ) ) m + 1 ( w a ) ( w a ) m = a [ ( w a ) ] m + 2 ( w a ) m = [ a , w w ] m + 1 ( a w ) m 1 a ,
as required. □
Corollary 3.2. 
Let a A . Then a A m and
a m = ( a ) m + 1 a m .
Proof. 
This is obvious by choosing w = 1 in Theorem 3.1. □
We call x is the ( 1 , 3 ) -inverse of a if x satisfies the equations a x a = a and ( a x ) = a x . We use A ( 1 , 3 ) to denote the set of all ( 1 , 3 ) -invertible elements in A . Let a A , w and a ( w a ) w A ( 1 , 3 ) . By using [2] [Theorem 2.5], a w , w a A . Let p = ( a w ) ( a w ) , q = ( w a ) ( w a ) . Then p , q A are projections.
Lemma 3.3. 
Let a A , w and a ( w a ) w A ( 1 , 3 ) . Then
a = a 1 a 2 0 a 3 p , q , w = w 1 w 2 0 w 3 q , p ,
where a 1 [ p A q ] 1 , w 1 [ q A p ] 1 and a 3 w 3 and w 3 a 3 are quasinilpotent.
Proof. 
We easily verify that
( 1 p ) a q = [ 1 ( a w ) ( a w ) ] a ( w a ) ( w a ) = [ 1 ( a w ) ( a w ) ] a w a ( w a ) n [ ( w a ) ] n + 1 = [ 1 ( a w ) ( a w ) ] ( a w ) n + 1 a [ ( w a ) ] n + 1 = a w [ ( a w ) n ( a w ) ( a w ) n + 1 ] a [ ( w a ) ] n + 1 .
Then
| | ( 1 p ) a q | | 1 n | | a w | | 1 n | | ( a w ) n ( a w ) ( a w ) n + 1 | | 1 n | | a [ ( w a ) ] n + 1 | | 1 n .
Since lim n | | ( a w ) n ( a w ) ( a w ) n + 1 | | 1 n = 0 , we see that lim n | | ( 1 p ) a q | | 1 n = 0 . This implies that ( 1 p ) a q = 0 . Likewise, we prove that
( 1 q ) w p = [ 1 ( w a ) ( w a ) ] w ( a w ) ( a w ) = 0 .
Moreover, we have
[ ( a w ) ( a w ) a ( w a ) ( w a ) ] [ ( w a ) ( w a ) w ( a w ) ( a w ) ( a w ) ] = ( a w ) ( a w ) ( a w ) a ( w a ) w ( a w ) = ( a w ) a ( w a ) w ( a w ) = ( a w ) ( a w ) , [ ( w a ) ( w a ) w ( a w ) ( a w ) ( a w ) ] [ ( a w ) ( a w ) a ( w a ) ( w a ) ] = ( w a ) ( w a ) w ( a w ) a ( w a ) ( w a ) = ( w a ) ( w a ) w a ( w a ) = ( w a ) ( w a ) .
Then a 1 = p a q [ p A q ] 1 . Similarly, w 1 = q w p [ q A p ] 1 .
Also we easily see that
a 3 w 3 = [ 1 ( a w ) ( a w ) ] a [ 1 w a ( w a ) ] w [ 1 ( a w ) ( a w ) ] A q n i l .
Thus, a 3 w 3 is quasinilpotent. By using Cline’s formula, w 3 a 3 is quasinilpotent. This completes the proof. □
Lemma 3.4. 
Let a A , w and a ( w a ) w A ( 1 , 3 ) . Then
a , w = ( w 1 a 1 w 1 ) 1 0 0 0 p , q .
Proof. 
In view of [2] [Theorem 2.1], a , w = a [ ( w a ) ] 2 . One easily checks that
p a , w ( 1 q ) = ( a w ) ( a w ) a [ ( w a ) ] 2 [ 1 ( w a ) ( w a ) ] = ( a w ) ( a w ) a ( w a ) [ ( w a ) ( w a ) ( w a ) ( w a ) ] = 0 , ( 1 p ) a , w q = [ 1 ( a w ) ( a w ) ] a [ ( w a ) ] 2 ( w a ) ( w a ) = [ 1 ( a w ) ( a w ) ] a w a [ ( w a ) ] 3 ( w a ) ( w a ) = a w [ 1 ( a w ) a w ] a [ ( w a ) ] 3 ( w a ) ( w a ) = 0 , ( 1 p ) a , w ( 1 q ) = [ 1 ( a w ) ( a w ) ] a [ ( w a ) ] 2 [ 1 ( w a ) ( w a ) ] = 0 .
Moreover, we see that
p a , w q = ( a w ) ( a w ) a [ ( w a ) ] 2 ( w a ) ( w a ) = ( a w ) ( a w ) a [ ( w a ) ] 2 = a [ ( w a ) ] 2 = w 1 a 1 w 1 p A q 1 ,
thus yielding the result. □
Theorem 3.5. 
Let a A , w and a ( w a ) w A ( 1 , 3 ) . Then
a m , w = α β 0 0 p , q ,
where
α = ( w 1 a 1 w 1 ) 1 , β = ( w 1 a 1 w 1 ) 1 a 2 + [ ( w 1 a 1 w 1 ) 1 w 1 ] m + 1 c m 1 a 3 + b m + 1 ( a 3 w 3 ) m 1 a 3 ; b 1 = ( w 1 a 1 w 1 ) 1 w 2 , b n + 1 = ( w 1 a 1 w 1 ) 1 w 1 b n , c 1 = a 1 w 2 + a 2 w 3 , c n + 1 = a 1 w 1 c n + ( a 1 w 2 + a 2 w 3 ) ( a 3 w 3 ) m .
Proof. 
Construct two series { b n } and { c n } by the equalities: Here,
b 1 = ( w 1 a 1 w 1 ) 1 w 2 , b n + 1 = ( w 1 a 1 w 1 ) 1 w 1 b n , c 1 = a 1 w 2 + a 2 w 3 , c n + 1 = a 1 w 1 c n + ( a 1 w 2 + a 2 w 3 ) ( a 3 w 3 ) m .
Then we compute that
( w 1 a 1 w 1 ) 1 0 0 0 w 1 w 2 0 w 3 m + 1 = [ ( w 1 a 1 w 1 ) 1 w 1 ] m + 1 b m + 1 0 0 , a 1 a 2 0 a 3 w 1 w 2 0 w 3 m 1 = ( a 1 w 1 ) m 1 c m 1 0 ( a 3 w 3 ) m 1 .
According to Theorem 3.1 and Lemma 3.4, we derive
a m , w = [ a , w w ] m + 1 ( a w ) m 1 a = [ ( w 1 a 1 w 1 ) 1 w 1 ] m + 1 b m + 1 0 0 ( a 1 w 1 ) m 1 c m 1 0 ( a 3 w 3 ) m 1 a 1 a 2 0 a 3 = α β 0 0 ,
where
α = ( w 1 a 1 w 1 ) 1 , β = ( w 1 a 1 w 1 ) 1 a 2 + [ ( w 1 a 1 w 1 ) 1 w 1 ] m + 1 c m 1 a 3 + b m + 1 ( a 3 w 3 ) m 1 a 3 .
This completes the proof. □
Corollary 3.6. 
Let a A . Then
a m = a 1 1 ( a 1 ) ( m + 1 ) b m 0 0 s , t ,
where b 1 = a 2 , b m + 1 = a 1 b m + a 2 a 3 m , s = a a and t = a a .
Proof. 
This is immediate by choosing w = 1 in Theorem 3.5. □

4. Weighted m -Generalized Core Inverse

The aim of this section is to investigate weighted m-generalized group inverse with weighted Moore-Penrose inverse. We introduce and study weighted m-generalized core inverse in a Banach *-algebra. Let p ( w a ) m = ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] be the projection on ( w a ) m . The following theorem is crucial.
Theorem 4.1. 
Let a A m , w . Then there exists a unique x A such that
x w a w x = x , a w x = a w a m , w p ( w a ) m , x ( w a ) m = a m , w ( w a ) m .
Proof. 
Taking x = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] . Then
x w a w x = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] w a w a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a m , w w a w a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = x , a w x = a w a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a w a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] , x ( w a ) m = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] ( w a ) m = a m , w ( w a ) m .
Suppose that x satisfies the preceding equations. Then one checks that
x = x w a w x = a m , w w a w x = a m , w w a w a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a m , w w a w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 w a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = x ,
as required. □
We denote the preceding unique x by a m , w .
Corollary 4.2. 
Let a A m , w ( m 2 ) . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a m , w = x .
(2)
The equation system
a w x = a ( w a ) m p ( w a ) m , a ( w x ) 2 = x
is consistent and its unique solution x = a m , w .
Proof. 
( 1 ) ( 2 ) In view of Theorem 4.1, we have
a w x = a w a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] .
Moreover, we have
a ( w x ) 2 = a w a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] w a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = x .
( 2 ) ( 1 ) Suppose that the equation system
a w x = a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] , a ( w x ) 2 = x
is consistent. In view of [4] [Corollary 2.4], we have
x = ( a w x ) w x = ( a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] ) w x = a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] ) w a ( w x ) 2 = a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] ) ( w a ) m ( w x ) m + 1 = a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m ( w x ) m + 1 = a ( w a ) m w x = a [ ( w a ) m 1 ] 2 w ( a w x ) = a [ ( w a ) m 1 ] 2 w [ a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] ] = a [ ( w a ) m 1 ] 2 ( w a ) [ ( w a ) m ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] ] = a ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ( w a ) m ( ( w a ) m ) ] = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a m , w ,
as asserted. □
Let a A m , w . In view of Theorem 4.1, a m , w = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] . Set c = a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m . We now establish necessary and sufficient conditions under which a has weighted m-generalized core inverse.
Theorem 4.3. 
Let a A m , w . The following are equivalent:
(1)
a m , w = x .
(2)
a w x = c [ ( w a ) m ] and x A a d , w A .
(3)
a w x = c [ ( w a ) m ] and a ( w x ) 2 = x .
Proof. 
( 1 ) ( 2 ) In view of Theorem 4.1, we have
a w x = a w a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = c [ ( w a ) m ] .
By virtue of Theorem 2.1, we have
x A = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] A a m , w A = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 A a ( w a ) d A a [ ( w a ) d ] 2 A a d , w A .
( 2 ) ( 1 ) Since a w x = c [ ( w a ) m ] , we have a w x = a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a w a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] .
Since x A a d , w A , we derive that a d , w w a w a d , w = a d , w . Hence, a d , w w a w x = x . In view of Theorem 2.1, a ( w a ) m a [ ( w a ) d ] 2 w A = ( a w ) d A . Then ( a w ) d a w a ( w a ) m = a ( w a ) m . We deduce that
x = a d , w w ( a w x ) = a [ ( w a ) d ] 2 w ( a w x ) = a [ ( w a ) d ] 2 w a w a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = ( a w ) d a w a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = ( a w ) d a w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] .
Therefore a m , w = x , as desired.
( 1 ) ( 3 ) By the argument above, we have a w x = c [ ( w a ) m ] . In view of Theorem 2.1, x = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] . By using Corollary 4.2, we have a ( w x ) 2 = x , as required.
( 3 ) ( 1 ) Since a w x = c [ ( w a ) m ] , we see that a w x = a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] . As a ( w x ) 2 = x , by virtue of Corollary 4.2, x = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a m , w , as required. □
Let X C n × n . The symbol R ( X ) denote the range space of X. We now derive
Corollary 4.4. 
Let A C n × n . The following are equivalent:
(1)
A , = X .
(2)
A W X = A A A A and R ( X ) R ( A D ) .
(3)
A W X = A ( W A ) W A A and A ( W X ) 2 = X .
Proof. 
Since A C n × n , we easily see that A 1 , w = A , . Therefore we complete the proof by Theorem 4.3. □
We are now ready to prove the following.
Theorem 4.5. 
Let a , w A . Then the following are equivalent:
(1)
a m , w = x .
(2)
x w c w x = x , a w x = c [ ( w a ) m ] and x w c = ( a w ) d c .
Proof. 
( 1 ) ( 2 ) In view of Theorem 4.1, x = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] . By virtue of Theorem 4.3, a w x = c [ ( w a ) m ] . Moreover, we verify that
x w c w x = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] [ w a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m w ] a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] [ w a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m w ] [ a ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 w a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] = x , x w c = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] w [ a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m ] = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] w a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 w a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m = a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m = a ( w a ) d ( w a ) [ ( w a ) m ] 2 ( w a ) m = a ( w a ) d ( w a ) m ( w a ) m = a [ ( w a ) d ] 2 w a ( w a ) m ( w a ) m = ( a w ) d c ,
as required.
( 2 ) ( 1 ) By hypothesis, we check that
x = x w c w x = ( x w c ) w x = [ ( a w ) d c ] w x = a [ ( w a ) d ] 2 ( w c w x ) a d , w A .
According to Theorem 4.3, we complete the proof. □
Corollary 4.6. 
Let A C n × n and C = A ( W A ) W A . The following are equivalent:
(1)
A , = X .
(2)
X W C W X = X , A W X = C ( W A ) and X W C = ( A W ) D C .
Proof. 
It is immediate by Theorem 4.5 by choosing m = 1 . □

5. Applications

The purpose of this section is to give the applications of the w-weighted m-generalized group (core) inverse in solving the matrix equations. We consider the following equation in A :
[ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 w x = [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m b , ( 5.1 )
where a , w , b A and m N .
Theorem 5.1. 
Let a A m , w . Then Eq. (5.1) has solution
x = a m , w b + [ 1 a m , w w a w ] y ,
where y A is arbitrary.
Proof. 
Let x = a m , w b + [ 1 a m , w w a w ] y , where y A . Then
w x = w a [ ( w a ) m ] 2 b + w [ 1 a ( ( w a ) m ) 2 w a w ] y = ( w a ) m b + [ w ( w a ) m w a w ] y .
Since [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 ( w a ) m = ( w a ) m , we verify that
[ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 w x = [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 ( w a ) m b + [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 [ w ( w a ) m w a w ] y = ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m b + [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 w ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m w a w ] y = [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m b ,
as asserted. □
Corollary 5.2. 
Let a A , w . Then the general solution of Eq. (5.1) is
x = a m , w b + [ 1 a m , w w a w ] y ,
where y A is arbitrary.
Proof. 
Let x be the solution of the Eq. (5.1). Then
[ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 w x = [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m b .
In view of Theorem 3.1, a m , w = [ a , w w ] m + 1 ( a w ) m 1 a . Then
a m , w w a w x = [ a , w w ] m + 1 ( a w ) m 1 a w a w x = [ a , w w ] m + 1 ( a w ) m + 1 x = [ a , w w ] m [ a ( ( w a ) ) 2 w ] ( a w ) m + 1 x = [ a , w w ] m [ a ( w a ) ] [ ( w a ) w a ( w a ) ] ( w a ) m + 1 w x = [ a , w w ] m [ a ( w a ) ] ( w a ) [ w a ( w a ) ] ( w a ) m + 1 w x = [ a , w w ] m [ a ( w a ) ] ( w a ) [ w a ( w a ) ] ( w a ) m + 1 w x = [ a , w w ] m [ a ( w a ) ] ( w a ) [ ( w a ) d ( w a ) 2 ( w a ) ] ( w a ) m + 1 w x = [ a , w w ] m [ a ( w a ) ] ( w a ) [ ( w a ) 2 ( w a ) ] [ ( ( w a ) d ) ( w a ) m + 1 w x ] = [ a , w w ] m [ a ( w a ) ] ( w a ) [ ( w a ) 2 ( w a ) ] [ ( ( w a ) d ) ( w a ) m b ] = [ a , w w ] m [ a ( w a ) ] ( w a ) [ ( w a ) d ( w a ) 2 ( w a ) ] ( w a ) m b = [ a , w w ] m [ a ( w a ) ] [ ( w a ) w a ( w a ) ] ( w a ) m b = [ a , w w ] m [ a ( ( w a ) ) 2 ] ( w a ) m b = [ a , w w ] m [ a ( ( w a ) ) 2 w ] ( a w ) m 1 a b = [ a , w w ] m + 1 ( a w ) m 1 a b = a m , w b .
Accordingly,
x = a m , w b + [ 1 a m , w w a w ] x .
By using Theorem 5.1, we complete the proof. □
Corollary 5.3. 
Let a A m , w . If x is the solution of Eq. (5.1) and i m ( x ) i m ( a w ) d , then
x = a m , w b .
Proof. 
By virtue of Theorem 5.1, a m , w b is a solution of Eq. (5.1). Let x 1 , x 2 A be the solutions of Eq. (5.1) and satisfy i m ( x i ) i m ( a w ) d . Write x 1 = ( a w ) d y 1 and x 2 = ( a w ) d y 2 . Then x 1 x 2 = [ ( a w ) d ] 2 a ( w a w ) ( x 1 x 2 ) . Hence, i m ( x 1 x 2 ) i m ( a w ) d . By hypothesis, we have
[ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 w x i = [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m b
for i = 1 , 2 . Then [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 w ( x 1 x 2 ) = 0 ; and so
[ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 w [ ( a w ) d ] 2 a ( w a w ) ( x 1 x 2 ) = 0 .
By using Cline’s formula, we have w [ ( a w ) d ] 2 a = ( w a ) d , and then
[ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) d ( w a ) m + 2 w ( x 1 x 2 ) = 0 .
Since the involution is proper, we have ( w a ) d ( w a ) m + 2 w ( x 1 x 2 ) = 0 ; whence, ( a w ) ( a w ) d ( x 1 x 2 ) = 0 . Thus, x 1 = a w ( a w ) d x 1 = a w ( a w ) d x 2 = x 2 . Therefore x = a m , w b is the unique solution of Eq. (5.1). □
Consider the following matrix equation:
[ ( W A ) D ] ( W A ) m + 1 W X = [ ( W A ) D ] ( W A ) m B , ( 5.2 )
where A C q × n , W C n × q , B C n × p and m N .
Corollary 5.4. 
( 1 ) The general solution of Eq. (5.2) is
X = A m , W B + [ I n A m , W W A W ] Y ,
where Y C n × p is arbitrary.
( 2 ) If X is the solution of Eq. (5.2) and R ( X ) R ( A W ) D , then
X = A m , W B .
Proof. 
This is obvious by Corollary 5.2 and Corollary 5.3. □
Let a A m , w . We now come to consider the following equation in A :
[ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 w x = [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) 2 m [ ( w a ) m ] b , ( 5.3 )
where a , w , b A and m N . The following lemma is crucial.
Lemma 5.5. 
Let a A m , w . Then a A , w .
Proof. 
By hypothesis, a A m , w A m , w . In light of [4] [Theorem 2.1], ( w a ) m A A . By virtue of [3] [Theorem 3.1], ( w a ) m A . Then w a A . Evidently, ( w a ) = ( w a ) m 1 [ ( w a ) m ] . Accordingly, a A , w by [2] [Theorem 2.1]. □
We are ready to prove:
Theorem 5.6. 
Let a A m , w . Then the general solution of Eq. (5.3) is
x = a m , w b + [ 1 a m , w w a w ] y ,
where y A is arbitrary.
Proof. 
Let x = a m , w b + [ 1 a m , w w a w ] y , where y A . In view of Theorem 4.1, a m , w = a m , w ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] . Then
x = a m , w [ ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] b ] + [ 1 a m , w w a w ] y .
By virtue of Theorem 5.1, x is the solution of Eq. (5.3).
In light of Lemma 5.5, a A , w . By using Corollary 5.2,
x = a m , w [ ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] b ] + [ 1 a m , w w a w ] y
is the general solution of Eq. (5.3), as required. □
Corollary 5.7. 
Let a A m , w . If x is the solution of Eq. (5.3) and i m ( x ) i m ( a w ) d , then
x = a m , w b .
Proof. 
By virtue of Theorem 5.6, a m , w b is a solution of Eq. (5.3). Let x 1 , x 2 A be the solutions of Eq. (5.3) and satisfy i m ( x i ) i m ( a w ) d . Then they are solutions of the equation:
[ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m + 1 w x = [ ( w a ) d ] ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m [ ( w a ) m ] b ] ,
as desired. □
Consider the following matrix equation:
[ ( W A ) D ] ( W A ) m + 1 W X = [ ( W A ) D ] ( W A ) 2 m [ ( W A ) m ] B , ( 5.4 )
where A C q × n , W C n × q , B C n × p and m N .
Corollary 5.8. 
( 1 ) The general solution of Eq. (5.4) is
X = A # m , W B + [ I n A # m , W W A W ] Y ,
where Y C n × p is arbitrary.
( 2 ) If X is the solution of Eq. (5.4) and R ( X ) R ( A W ) D , then
X = A # m , W B .
Proof. 
This is obvious by Theorem 5.5 and Corollary 5.6. □

References

  1. Chen, H.; Sheibani, M. Generalized group inverse in a Banach *-algebra. preprint 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, H.; Sheibani, M. Weighted generalized core-EP inverse in Banach *-algebras. preprint 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, H.; Sheibani, M. Generalized core inverse in Banach *-algebra. Operators and Matrices 2024, 18, 173–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, H. m-generalized group inverse in Banach *-algebras. Mediter. J. Math. 2025, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gao, J.; Kezheng, W.; Wang, Q. A m-weak group inverse for rectangular matrices. preprint 2023, arXiv:2312.10704 [math.RA]. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferreyra, D.E.; Malik, B.S. The m-weak core inverse. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 2024, 118, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ferreyra, D.E.; Mosić, D. The W-weighted m-weak core inverse. preprint 2024, arXiv:2403.14196 [math.RA]. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferreyra, D.E.; Orquera, V.; Thome, N. A weak group inverse for rectangular matrices. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 2019, 113, 3727–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ferreyra, D.E.; Orquera, V.; Thome, N. Representations of weighted WG inverse and a rank equation’s solution. Linear and Multilinear Algebra 2023, 71, 226–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ferreyra, D.E.; Thorme, N.; Torigino, C. The W-weighted BT inverse. Quaest. Math. 2023, 46, 359–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, Y.; Chen, J. Pseudo core inverses in rings with involution. Comm. Algebra 2018, 46, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, W.; Chen, J.; Zhou, Y. Characterizations and representations of weak core inverses and m-weak group inverses. Turk. J. Math. 2023, 47, 1453–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liao, Y.; Chen, J.; Cui, J. Cline’s formula for the generalized Drazin inverse. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2014, 37, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mihajlovic, N. Group inverse and core inverse in Banach and C*-algebras. Comm. Algebra 2020, 48, 1803–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mosić, D.; Marovt, J. Weighted weak core inverse of operators. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2022, 70, 4991–5013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mosić, D.; Stanimirović, P.S. Expressions and properties of weak core inverse. Appl. Math. Comput. 2022, 415, 126704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mosić, D.; Zhang, D. Weighted weak group inverse for Hilbert space operators. Front. Math. China 2020, 15, 709–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mosić, D.; Zhang, D. New representations and properties of the m-weak group inverse. Result. Math. 2023, 78, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stanimirović, P.S.; Katsikis, V.N.; Ma, H. Representations and properties of the W-weighted Drazin inverse. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2017, 65, 1080–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, H.; Chen, J. Weak group inverse. Open Math. 2018, 16, 1218–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, M.; Chen, J.; Zhou, Y. Weak group inverses in proper *-rings. J. Algebra Appl. 2020, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, M.; Chen, J.; Zhou, Y.; Thome, N. Weak group inverses and partial isometries in proper *-rings. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2021, 70, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, Y.; Chen, J. Weak core inverses and pseudo core inverses in a ring with involution. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2022, 70, 6876–6890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhou, M. m-Weak group inverses in a ring with involution. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 2021, 115, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated