1. Introduction
Let
be a Banach algebra. An element
has group inverse provided that there exists
such that
Such
x is unique if exists, denoted by
, and called the group inverse of
a (see [
14]). As is well known, a square complex matrix
A has group inverse if and only if
.
A Banach algebra is called a Banach *-algebra if there exists an involution
satisfying
. The involution * is proper if
for any
, e.g., in a Rickart *-algebra, the involution is always proper. Let
be the Banach algebra of all
complex matrices, with conjugate transpose * as the involution. Then the involution * is proper. In [
21], Zou et al. extended the notion of weak group inverse from complex matrices to elements in a ring with proper involution.
Let
be a Banach algebra with a proper involution *. An element
a in a
has weak group inverse if there exists
such that
for som
. Such
x is unique if it exists and is called the weak group inverse of
a. We denote it by
(see [
21,
22]). A square complex matrix
A has weak group inverse
X if it satisfies the system of equations:
Here,
is the core-EP inverse of
A (see [
11,
13]). Weak group inverse was extensively studied by many authors, e.g., [
8,
17,
20,
21,
22].
In [
1], the authors extended weak group inverse and introduced generalized group inverse in a Banach algebra with proper involution. An element
a in
has generalized group inverse if there exists
such that
Such
x is unique if it exists and is called the generalized group inverse of
a. We denote it by
. Many properties of generalized group inverse were presented in [
1]. Mosić and Zhang introduced and studied weighted weak group inverse for a Hilbert space operator
A in
(see [
17]). Furthermore, the weak group inverse was generalized to the
m-weak group inverse (see [
11,
18,
24]). Recently, Gao et al. further introduced and studied the
W-weighted
m-weak group inverse in [
11].
The main purpose of this paper is to extend the concept of W-weighted m-weak group inverse for complex matrices to elements in a Banach *-algebra. This extension is called weighted m-generalized group inverse.
An element
has generalized
w-Drazin inverse
x if there exists unique
such that
We denote
x by
(see [
19]). Here,
We denote
by
. Evidently,
if and only if
. We introduce a new weighted generalized inverse as follows:
Definition 1.1.
An element has w-weighted m-generalized group inverse if and there exists such that
The preceding x is called the w-weighted m-generalized group inverse of a, and denoted by .
The
w-weighted
m-generalized group inverse is a natural generalization of the
m-generalized group inverse which was introduced in [
4]. Let
be the
m-generalized group inverse of
a. Evidently,
. We list some characterizations of
m-generalized group inverse.
Theorem 1.2. (see [4] [Theorem 2.3, Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 4.1]) Let be a Banach *-algebra, and let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
There exist such that
- (3)
and there exists such that
- (4)
and there exists such that
- (5)
and there exists an idempotent such that
- (6)
and there exists such that .
In
Section 2, we investigate elementary properties of
w-weighted
m-generalized group inverse in a Banach *-algebra. Many new properties of the weak group inverse for a complex matrix and Hilbert space operator are thereby obtained.
Following [
2], an element
a in
has generalized
w-core-EP inverse if there exist
such that
The preceding
x is unique if exists, and we denote it by
. We denote
by
. Evidently,
if and only if
(see [
2] [Theorem 2.1]). In
Section 3, we investigate the representations of
m-generalized group inverse under weighted generalized core-EP invertibility.
Recall that an element
has Moore-Penrose inverse if there exist
such that
The preceding
x is unique if it exists, and we denote it by
. An element
a in
has weak core inverse provided that
(see [
16,
23]). In [
3], the authors introduced and studied the generalized core inverse. The
m-weak core inverse and weighted weak core inverse were investigated in [
10,
15]. Recently, Ferreyra and Mosić introduced the
W-weighted
m-weak core inverse for complex matrices which generalized the (weighted) core-EP inverse, the weak group inverse and
m-weak core inverse (see [
7]). A square complex matrix
A has
W-weighted
m-weak core inverse
X if
Here,
is the
W-weighted
m-weak group inverse of
A, i.e.,
has weak group inverse (see [
20]). Let
. Set
if
. We have
Definition 1.3. An element has w-weighted m-generalized core inverse if .
In
Section 4, We present various properties, presentations of such weighted generalized group inverse combined with weighted Moore-Penrose inverse. We extend the properties of generalized core inverse in Banach *-algebra to the general case(see [
3]). Many properties of the
W-weighted
m-weak core inverse are thereby extended to wider cases, e.g. Hilbert operators over an infinitely dimensional space.
Finally, in
Section 5, we give the applications of the
w-weighted
m-generalized group (core) inverse in solving the matrix equations.
Throughout the paper, all Banach algebras are complex with a proper involution *. We use and to denote the sets of all Moore-Penrose invertible, weighted generalized Drazin invertible, generalized core-EP invertible, generalized group invertible and weak group invertible elements in , respectively.
2. Weighted -Generalized Group Inverse
In this section we introduce and establish elementary properties of weighted
m-generalized group inverse which will be used in the next section. This also extend the concept of
w-weighted
m-weak group inverse from complex matrices to elements in a Banach algebra (see [
11]). We begin with
Theorem 2.1. Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
.
In this case,
Proof.
By hypothesis, we can find
such that
Obviously,
. Hence,
Let
Then
and we verify that
Therefore
the result follows. □
The preceding unique solution x is called the w-weighted generalized m-group inverse of a, and denote it by . That is, We use to denote the set of all w-weighted generalized m-group invertible elements in . By the argument above, we have
Corollary 2.2. Let . Then
- (1)
.
- (2)
and .
Corollary 2.3. Let . Then if and only if
- (1)
;
- (2)
There exists
such that
Proof. ⟹ Obviously,
. By hypothesis, there exists
such that
In this case,
Then
⟸ By hypothesis, there exists
such that
Clearly,
. Observing that
we see that
This implies that . According to Theorem 2.1, as asserted. □
Theorem 2.4. Let . Then if and only if
- (1)
;
- (2)
There exists
such that
Proof. ⟹ Clearly,
. In view of Theorem 2.1,
. According to Theorem 1.2, There exists
such that
Here,
. Set
. Then
Moreover, we have
and then
In this case, as desired.
⟸ By hypothesis, there exists
such that
Then . In view of Theorem 1.2, . According to Theorem 2.1, , as asserted. □
Corollary 2.5. Let . Then if and only if
- (1)
;
- (2)
There exists
such that
Proof. This is obvious by Theorem 2.4. □
Set . We are ready to prove:
Theorem 2.6. Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
- (3)
- (4)
Proof.
In view of Theorem 2.1,
Then
and
Obviously,
Moreover, we have
Therefore as desired.
Since
we see that
as desired.
Write
for some
. Then
This completes the proof by Theorem 2.1. □
Corollary 2.7. Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
- (3)
Proof. This is a direct consequence of Theorem 2.6. □
We are ready to prove:
Theorem 2.8. Let . Then .
Proof. In view of Theorem 2.1, we see that
In view of [
4] [Corollary 2.4], we have
This completes the proof. □
Corollary 2.9. Let . Then .
Proof. This is obvious by choosing in Theorem 2.8. □
4. Weighted -Generalized Core Inverse
The aim of this section is to investigate weighted m-generalized group inverse with weighted Moore-Penrose inverse. We introduce and study weighted m-generalized core inverse in a Banach *-algebra. Let be the projection on . The following theorem is crucial.
Theorem 4.1.
Let . Then there exists a unique such that
Proof. Taking
. Then
Suppose that
satisfies the preceding equations. Then one checks that
as required. □
We denote the preceding unique x by .
Corollary 4.2. Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
The equation system
is consistent and its unique solution
.
Proof.
In view of Theorem 4.1, we have
Suppose that the equation system
is consistent. In view of [
4] [Corollary 2.4], we have
as asserted. □
Let . In view of Theorem 4.1, . Set . We now establish necessary and sufficient conditions under which a has weighted m-generalized core inverse.
Theorem 4.3. Let . The following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
and .
- (3)
and .
Proof.
In view of Theorem 4.1, we have
By virtue of Theorem 2.1, we have
Since , we have .
Since
, we derive that
. Hence,
. In view of Theorem 2.1,
. Then
. We deduce that
Therefore , as desired.
By the argument above, we have . In view of Theorem 2.1, . By using Corollary 4.2, we have , as required.
Since , we see that . As , by virtue of Corollary 4.2, , as required. □
Let . The symbol denote the range space of X. We now derive
Corollary 4.4. Let . The following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
and .
- (3)
and .
Proof. Since , we easily see that . Therefore we complete the proof by Theorem 4.3. □
We are now ready to prove the following.
Theorem 4.5. Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
and .
Proof.
In view of Theorem 4.1,
. By virtue of Theorem 4.3,
. Moreover, we verify that
as required.
By hypothesis, we check that
According to Theorem 4.3, we complete the proof. □
Corollary 4.6. Let and . The following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
and .
Proof. It is immediate by Theorem 4.5 by choosing . □
5. Applications
The purpose of this section is to give the applications of the
w-weighted
m-generalized group (core) inverse in solving the matrix equations. We consider the following equation in
:
where
and
.
Theorem 5.1.
Let . Then Eq. (5.1) has solution
where is arbitrary.
Proof. Let
where
. Then
Since
we verify that
as asserted. □
Corollary 5.2.
Let . Then the general solution of Eq. (5.1) is
where is arbitrary.
Proof. Let
x be the solution of the Eq. (5.1). Then
In view of Theorem 3.1,
. Then
By using Theorem 5.1, we complete the proof. □
Corollary 5.3.
Let . If x is the solution of Eq. (5.1) and , then
Proof. By virtue of Theorem 5.1,
is a solution of Eq. (5.1). Let
be the solutions of Eq. (5.1) and satisfy
. Write
and
. Then
. Hence,
. By hypothesis, we have
for
. Then
; and so
By using Cline’s formula, we have
, and then
Since the involution is proper, we have ; whence, . Thus, . Therefore is the unique solution of Eq. (5.1). □
Consider the following matrix equation:
where
and
.
Corollary 5.4.
The general solution of Eq. (5.2) is
where is arbitrary.
If X is the solution of Eq. (5.2) and , then
Proof. This is obvious by Corollary 5.2 and Corollary 5.3. □
Let
. We now come to consider the following equation in
:
where
and
. The following lemma is crucial.
Lemma 5.5. Let . Then .
Proof. By hypothesis,
In light of [
4] [Theorem 2.1],
. By virtue of [
3] [Theorem 3.1],
. Then
. Evidently,
. Accordingly,
by [
2] [Theorem 2.1]. □
We are ready to prove:
Theorem 5.6.
Let . Then the general solution of Eq. (5.3) is
where is arbitrary.
Proof. Let
where
. In view of Theorem 4.1,
. Then
By virtue of Theorem 5.1, x is the solution of Eq. (5.3).
In light of Lemma 5.5,
. By using Corollary 5.2,
is the general solution of Eq. (5.3), as required. □
Corollary 5.7.
Let . If x is the solution of Eq. (5.3) and , then
Proof. By virtue of Theorem 5.6,
is a solution of Eq. (5.3). Let
be the solutions of Eq. (5.3) and satisfy
. Then they are solutions of the equation:
as desired. □
Consider the following matrix equation:
where
and
.
Corollary 5.8.
The general solution of Eq. (5.4) is
where is arbitrary.
If X is the solution of Eq. (5.4) and , then
Proof. This is obvious by Theorem 5.5 and Corollary 5.6. □