1. Introduction
A Banach algebra
is called a Banach *-algebra if there exists an involution
satisfying
. An element
a in a Banach *-algebra
has group inverse if and only if there exist
such that
If such x exists, it is unique, and denote it by .
An element
a in a Banach *-algebra
has core inverse if and only if there exist
such that
If such
x exists, it is unique, and denote it by
. Group and core inverses are extensively studied by many authors from different views, e.g. [
1,
7,
10,
16,
19].
An element
has
w-group inverse if there exist
such that
We denote the preceding x by . The set of all w-group invertible elements in is denoted by .
In [
24], Zhu et al. introduced and studied a weighted generalized inverse as a generalization of core inverse. Let
. An element
is
w-core invertible if there exists some
such that
Such an x is called a w-core inverse of a.
Many properties of
w-core inverse are presented by many authors, e.g. [
8,
20,
22,
24]. However, a
w-core invertible element in a Banach algebra is not necessarily
w-group invertible. This observation motivates the introduction and study of a new weighted generalized inverse that combines core and
w-group inverses.
Definition 1.
An element is weighted w-core invertible if there exist such that
Such x is called the weighted w-core inverse of a and denoted by . Let denote the set of all weighted w-core invertible elements in .
In
Section 2, we characterize the weighted core inverse by the solution of equation systems. We establish the polar-like property of this new generalized inverse. We prove that
if and only if there exists a projection
such that
In
Section 3, we examine the connections between the weighted
w-core inverse and related generalized inverses. If
and
w satisfy the equations
and
, then
x is called weighted
w-
-inverse of
a and is denoted by
. We use
to stand for sets of all weighted
w-
-invertible elements in
. We prove that
if and only if
. Consequently, many equivalent properties of the weighted
w-core inverse are presented.
Finally, in
Section 4, we focus on the decomposition associated with the weighted
w-core inverse.
Definition 2.
An element has generalized weighted w-core decomposition if there exist such that
Let
be the set of all elements having generalized weighted
w-core decomposition in
. We prove that
if and only if there exists
such that
The preceding
x is called the generalized weighted
w-core inverse of
a, and denoted by
. We then characterize this generalized inverse of the preceding decomposition from multiple perspectives. An element
has generalized
w-Drazin inverse
x if there exists unique
such that
We denote
x by
(see [
11]). We finally establish the identity
2. Weighted w-Core Inverse
The aim of this section is to first introduce the weighted w-core inverse and present several of its fundamental properties.
Theorem 1.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
There exists
such that
Proof. By hypothesis, there exists
such that
One directly verify that
as required.
This is trivial. □
Corollary 1.
Let . Then and .
Proof. Let
. By virtue of Theorem 2.1,
Let
. Then we verify that
This implies that , as desired. □
If and w satisfy the equations and , then x is called weighted w--inverse of a and is denoted by . We use to stand for sets of all weighted w--invertible elements in .
Theorem 2.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
.
In this case, .
Proof. By virtue of Corollary 2.2, . Let . In view of Theorem 2.1, there exists such that Hence, , as desired.
Let
. Then we check that
Therefore , as asserted. □
Corollary 2.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
and there exists such that
- (3)
and there exists such that
Proof. This is obvious by Theorem 2.1.
By hypothesis, there exists such that Hence, as required.
By assumption, and there exists such that Then , and so . Therefore we complete the proof by Theorem 2.3. □
Lemma 1.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
.
- (3)
and .
- (4)
and .
Proof. This direction is obvious.
Write
for some
. Then we have
This implies that and so . Thus , as required.
Write for some . We directly verify that , as required.
This is obvious by the symmetry. □
Lemma 2.
Let . Then if and only if and . In this case,
Proof.
Hence, , and so . Likewise, . This implies that . Moreover, we have as desired.
⟸ Set
. Then we verify that
Therefore , as asserted. □
Lemma 3.
Let . If , then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
There exists
such that
Proof. This is clear by Theorem 2.1.
Since , we have . Obviously, . Write for a . Then . This implies that . Hence, . By hypothesis, we have . Obviously, . As , we deuce that ; hence, . Thus ; hence, by Lemma 2.5. Since , we have . Then . In light of Lemma 2.6, and .
Since , we have ; and so . This implies that . Thus, we derive that . Thus, . Therefore by Theorem 2.3. □
Lemma 4.
Let . If , then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
There exists
such that
Proof. This is obvious by Theorem 2.1.
By hypothesis,
. Clearly,
. On the other hand,
; hence,
. This implies that
. Hence,
by Lemma 2.5. Set
. Since
, we have
. Then we verify that
Therefore , as asserted. □
We are ready to prove:
Theorem 3.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
There exists
such that
- (3)
There exists
such that
Proof. Since , we see that . Therefore we complete the proof by Lemma 2.7 and Lemma 2.8. □
We come now to present a polar-like property for weighted w-core inverse in a Banach *-algebra.
Theorem 4.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
There exists a projection such that
- (3)
There exists a projection such that
Proof. Since
, there exists
such that
Let
. Then
and
. Obviously,
. Moreover, we check that
Then
By hypothesis, there exists a projection such that and Let . Then . Hence, . By using Jacobson’s Lemma, . Therefore , as desired.
By hypothesis, there exists a projection
such that
and
. Then
. By Jacobson’s Lemma, we prove that
Then
As
. Write
for some
. Then
Since
and
, we have
. Then
. Moreover, we check that
Therefore , as required. □
Corollary 3.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
There exists a unique projection such that
Proof. As in the proof of Theorem 2.10,
. Obviously,
. Obviously,
is unique (see [
16]). Thus
p is unique, as desired.
This is proved by Theorem 2.8. □
3. Connections to Related Generalized Inverses
In [
9], Mary presented the existence criterion for the inverse along an element by the intersection of ideals, i.e,
a is invertible along
w if and only if
.
Lemma 5.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
and .
Proof. Let
. In view of Theorem 2.1, we have
Then
On the other hand, we have
Thus,
. By virtue of [
9],
. In light of Theorem 2.3,
, as required.
Since , we can find such that and .
As
, it follows by [
9] that
. Then
and
.
Since . Hence, . In view of Lemma 2.5, . Then . By using Cline’s formula, . By using Lemma 2.5 again, .
Set
By using Cline’s formula, we check that
Therefore . According to Theorem 2.3, , as asserted. □
Theorem 5.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
.
Proof. In view of Lemma 3.1,
and
. Then we can find
such that
and
. This implies that
. By virtue of [
24],
.
In view of [
24],
. This completes the proof by Theorem 2.3. □
Corollary 4.
Let and . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
.
Proof. Since , we prove that if and only if Therefore we obtain the result by Theorem 3.2. □
Corollary 5.
Let and . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
and .
Proof. In view of Theorem 3.2,
. By virtue of [
8],
.
In light of [
8],
. This completes the proof by Theorem 3.2. □
Corollary 6.
Let and . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
.
Proof. By virtue of Theorem 3.2,
. It follows by [
8] that
. Set
. Then
and
. Hence,
where
Moreover, we have
and so
. This implies that
. According to Theorem 3.2,
.
In view of Theorem 3.2,
. By using [
8],
Set
. Then
. Let
. then
and
. This implies that
. By using Theorem 3.2 again,
, as asserted. □
Lemma 6.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
.
Proof. Since , we can find some such that and . Hence , as desired.
Write for some . Then , and so . This implies that . Therefore , as required. □
Lemma 7.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
.
Proof. In view of Lemma 3.1,
and
. By virtue of [
9],
. According to Lemma 3.6, we have
. Write
for some
. Then
, as desired.
Since , we have hence, . In view of Lemma 3.6,
Write
for some
. Then
; hence,
. Accordingly,
In light of [
9],
. According to Lemma 3.1,
. □
We are ready to prove:
Theorem 6.
Let and . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
.
Proof. In view of Theorem 3.2,
. By using [
8],
. It follows by Lemma 3.7 that
. Hence,
. Therefore
.
By hypothesis, we have
. In light of [
8],
. Moreover, we have
. According to Lemma 3.6,
. Therefore
by Theorem 3.2. □
Corollary 7.
Let and . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
There exists a projection such that
Proof. Let
. Then
and
. Set
. Then we verify that
Therefore , as desired.
Case 1. . This is proved by Theorem 2.10.
Case 2.
. By hypothesis, there exists a projection
such that
Then , and then . Moreover, we have ; hence, . This implies that . Since , we deduce that . Thus, . Therefore we complete the proof by Theorem 3.8. □
4. The Associated Decomposition
In this section, we focus on the decomposition associated with the weighted w-core inverse. We now characterize generalized weighted w-core invertibility through a system of equations.
Theorem 7.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
- (2)
There exists
such that
Proof. By hypothesis, there exist
such that
It is easy to verify that
Since , we see that . Therefore as required.
By hypotheses, there exists
such that
Set
and
. We verify that
We claim that and .
Claim 1. . We verify that
Claim 2. . Clearly, we have , and then .
Claim 3. . One checks that
Therefore
. Moreover, we see that
Therefore
and then
. This completes the proof. □
We denote x in Theorem 4.1 by , and call it a generalized weighted w-core inverse of a.
Corollary 8.
Let . Then and .
Proof. In view of Theorem 4.1, there exists
such that
Then
. By hypothesis, there exist
such that
Hence
and
. In view of [
4],
. Therefore
by [
5]. In this case,
. □
Corollary 9.
Let . Then if and only if .
Proof. This is obvious by Theorem 4.1 and Corollary 2.4. □
We come now to present the polar-like property of elements associated the weighted w-core inverse.
Theorem 8.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
There exists a projection such that
Proof. Since
, there exists
such that
In view of Corollary 4.2,
and
. In light of [
6], there exists a projection
such that
Exactly, we have . Then , as desired.
By hypothesis, there exists a projection
such that
Set
and
. Then
Claim 1. . Write and . Set . Then we verify that
Since , we have . Then . Then .
Since
and
, it follows by [
21] that
, and so
. By virtue of Cline’s formula,
. Then
. By Cline’s formula again,
. Since
, it follows by [
21] that
. Thus,
, and then
. Therefore we verify that
Therefore and .
Claim 2.
. We verify that
Since , we have Then Therefore , as asserted. □
Corollary 10.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
There exists a projection such that
Proof. This is obvious by choosing in Theorem 4.4. □
Lemma 8.
Let . Then if and only if
- (1)
;
- (2)
There exists
such that
In this case, .
Proof. ⟹ Set
. By virtue of Corollary 4.2,
and
. In view of [
5],
and
Since , we easily check that and then On the other hand, we have and Thus, Therefore .
⟸ By hypothesis, There exists
such that
As the argument above, we have
By virtue of [
5],
and
. Therefore we have
Since
and
, we have
. This implies that
for any
. Hence
. This implies that
whence
Thus
. Therefore
, as required. □
We are now prepared to prove:
Theorem 9.
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (1)
.
- (2)
and .
In this case,
Proof. As in the proof of Corollary 4.2,
. By using Cline’s formula,
. Hence,
. Let
. Then we have
Obviously,
for any
. Then
Since
, we get
Hence
. Furthermore, we have
Since
, we deduce that
Hence
. Let
. Then
Accordingly, and as required.
Set
. Then we have
Let
. Then we verify that
Clearly,
. Also we see that
whence,
Then
.
We easily verify that
and then,
. On the other hand, we have
and so
. Hence
. Therefore
by Lemma 4.6. In this case,
□