1. Introduction
Poultry farming is seeking alternatives to antibiotics during production, as well as to enhance safety and product quality. Chicken meat is low in fat and high in protein [
1]. The age of chickens is an important factor for nutrient absorption, and each production phase is characterized by physiological development of the animal (i.e., organ formation, tissue development and deposition of muscle and fat) to meet the marketing requirements of the carcass [
2]. Furthermore, the FAO and WHO established decreased use of antibiotics by up to 50% over the next 10 years [
3]. Alternatives for replacing antibiotics are probiotics, enzymes, organic acids and essential oils (EO) from aromatic plants (EOAP). The EO of EOAP thyme, rosemary and oregano have been the most evaluated in broiler production [
4]. Oregano essential oil (OEO) has shown good effect for reducing pathogenic bacteria in the intestine, improving antioxidant status and reducing blood cholesterol [
5], and improving productive parameters and reducing mortality rates [
6]. Mexican oregano essential oil (MOEO) has high concentrations of active compounds such as carvacrol and thymol, and
Lippia berlandieri Schauer and
Poliomintha longiflora Gray are the MOEO species more sustainably exploited [
7]. Lee
et al. [
8] found that EO supplementation can stimulate carbohydrate digestion, fat absorption and protein transformation. Recently, Meligy
et al. [
9] showed that supplementation of 400 mg/kg of OEO in feed improved antioxidant activity and intestinal health of broiler chickens. Furthermore, productivity parameters were improved with 300 and 600 mg/kg of OEO in diets [
10]. However, studies have used EO supplementation throughout all production phases of grow-out (six weeks or 42 days). It is possible that EOAP, such as OEO, supplementation in diets may be effective when applied at certain phases or time periods of production, because the physiology and metabolism of broiler chickens are changing during their growth. In this study, the effect of MOEO supplementation during each of three production phases of broiler chicken grow-out and continuously overall production phases was evaluated for feed intake, water intake, weight gain and feed conversion rate. The results from this study demonstrated that MOEO supplemented per phase influenced production without continuous prevision over all phases of chicken fattening. This option can improve the profitability of production systems using oregano essential oil.
2. Materials and Methods
The study was carried out over 41 days of grow-out at the Marín campus of the Facultad de Agronomía of the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (UANL), Marín, Nuevo León, México. Marín is located between parallels 25° 45’ and 26° 02’ north latitude, meridians - 100° 06’ west longitude, and average altitude of 850 m, with temperature between 18° to 24° C, and annual precipitation of 600-800 mm. The Marin campus borders to the north with the municipalities of Higueras and Cerralvo, to the south with Pesquería, to the east with Doctor González and to the west with General Zuazua [
11].
2.1. Experimental Design Through Diets
The experiment was carried out with 300 1-d-old Ross-308 broiler chicks (49.40 ± 1.30 g), which were randomly assigned to five experimental groups considering production phases [starter, weeks 1 (7 d) and 2 (14 d); grower, weeks 3 (21 d) and 4 (28 d); finisher, weeks 5 (35 d) and 6 (41 d)]. Treatments consisted of MOEO
0, control diet without MOEO (0 mg/kg of feed); MOEO
12, diet with MOEO at 100 mg/kg in weeks 1 and 2; MOEO
34, diet with MOEO at 100 mg/kg in weeks 3 and 4; MOEO
56, diet with MOEO at 100 mg/kg in weeks 5 and 6; and MOEO
16, diet with MOEO at 100 mg/kg from weeks 1 to 6. Each treatment group consisted of 6 replicate pens with 10 broilers per pen. The diets were formulated based on the nutritional requirements of broiler chickens (Nutritional specifications for
Ross-308 broiler chickens) (
Table 1). The experiment was approved (ID 0426/2023) by the biosecurity, bioethics and animal welfare committee of the Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, UANL. In addition, the NOM-026-ZOO [
12] on production, care and use of laboratory animals was considered in the study.
2.2. Productivity Variables
The initial weight (IW) of chickens was recorded at the beginning of the study. Live chicken weights (CW) were determined per week [1 (7 d), 2 (14 d), 3 (21 d), 4 (28 d), 5 (35 d) and 6 (41 d)]. Likewise, feed intake (FI = feed intake per week/number of chickens in the pen), water intake (WI = water intake per week/number of chickens), weight gain (WG = (final weight – previous weight – IW)), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) based on FI (FCRFI = WG/FI) and WI (FCRWI = WG/WI) were determined at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Overall FI, WI, FCRFI and FCRWI were estimated per phase (two weeks each). Finally, total productivity was estimated considering all phases.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
The general linear model (GLM) was used to analyze the production data considering the statistical model: y
ijk = µ + T
i + λ + Ԑ
ij; where: y
ijk= productive variables measured during the experiment; µ= general mean; T
i= effect of the ith-treatment (MOEO
0, MOEO
12, MOEO
34, MOEO
56 and MOEO
16); λ = effect of the IW covariate and Ԑ
ijk = experimental error. A significance level of P < 0.05 was used to establish difference between treatments in ANOVA. When H
0 was rejected, the means were compared using the Tukey’s test at P < 0.05 level of significance. A significant trend per variable was considered when the P-value was less than 0.10 (P < 0.10), and the comparison of means was performed with the Fischer test (P < 0.10). The statistical package Minitab® 17.1.0 [
13] was used for data analyses.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Chickens Weight
The results of live chicken weight (CW) of broilers supplemented with MOEO are presented in
Table 2. The CW showed no difference (P > 0.05) between treatments over 41 days. The MOEO
12 group presented a relatively high weight at 7, 14 and 28 d, while MOEO
16 at 21 d. The broilers of the MOEO
34 treatment had a relatively high CW at 35 and 41 d. Similar results in CW were found when feeding Colombian OEO at 100 mg/kg of feed over 35 days [
14]. However, Cázares-Gallegos
et al. [
15] obtained differences in CW with MOEO at 400 mg/kg, but with CW being lower than that in the present study where MOEO at 100 mg/kg was used throughout production. In the current study, although CW did not present changes over the study time. MOEO
34 did show improved CW at 41 d. This finding may indicate that OEO at 100 mg/kg supplemented in weeks 3 and 4 could improve CW. However, Zhang
et al. [
16] showed that high levels of OEO provided in these weeks could improve CW since they found effect on CW with 200 mg/kg over 42 days. The results of the current study indicated that MOEO at 100 mg/kg can improve the CW in weeks 3 and 4, but it is possible that some effect could improve with concentrations greater than 200 mg/kg or higher levels.
3.2. Feed Intake
Feed intake (FI) was different (P < 0.05) at 14 and 28 d (
Table 3). At both periods, the chickens of the MOEO
12 group consumed the most feed, while MOEO
16 and MOEO
34 had the lowest FI. These results indicated that in the starter and grower phases, FI was affected by MOEO. At 28 d, Méndez-Zamora
et al. [
17] obtained a similar performance for FI with MOEO at 250 and 400 mg/kg. FI was affected by MOEO at 100 mg/kg, which may be due to the better uptake of nutrients when using levels greater than 50 mg/kg [
18]. According to results obtained in that study, FI effects can be seen with MOEO at 100, 250 and 400 mg/kg on day 28 of broiler production, but broilers may exhibit differences at longer periods of supplementation.
3.3. Water Intake
The water intake (WI) of chickens supplemented with MOEO is shown in
Table 4. The treatments did not show differences (P > 0.05) in WI. The MOEO
12 group had relatively high WI at 7 and 21 d, while MOEO
34 had high WI at 14 and 35 d but low WI on 41 d. The MOEO
16 group had relatively higher WI at 28 and 41 d. Hernández-Coronado
et al. [
19] found differences in WI when those authors evaluated MOEO at 400 mg/kg at 41 d. This effect on WI can be attributed to the environmental, genetics (breed) and FI factors [
20]. The finding showed that WI was not affected by MOEO at 100 mg/kg.
3.4. Feed Conversion Ratio Based on FI
Table 5 presents the feed conversion ratio based on feed intake (FCR
FI). The experimental groups showed a trend (P < 0.10) on day 14 of the study. The FCR
FI of MOEO
16 chickens was the highest (least efficient) and MOEO
12 the lowest (most efficient). The FCR
FI at 21 and 35 d remained low for MOEO
12, while MOEO
0 at 28 and 41 d was lower. Results obtained by Chowdhury
et al. [
5] showed differences in FCR
FI at 21 d with 400 mg/kg of feed of different essential oils (ajaí, clove and cinnamon). Moharreri
et al. [
21] presented differences in FCR
FI with 500 mg/kg of mixture of microencapsulated essential oils (thymol, carvacrol, p-cymene, γ-terpinene and menthol). The results obtained for FCR
FI in the current study with 100 mg/kg could be related to the active compounds of MOEO (carvacrol and thymol) for improving feed conversion. Therefore, the essential oils of aromatic plants that contain carvacrol and thymol can promote FCR at doses of 100 to 500 mg/kg of feed.
3.5. Feed Conversion Ratio Based on WI
The feed conversion based on water intake (FCR
WI) showed no differences (P > 0.05) among treatments (
Table 6). The FCR
WI was numerically lower in MOEO
56 at 7 d, MOEO
34 lower at 14 d, MOEO
12 lower at 21 and 41 d, while MOEO
16 was lower at 28 d and MOEO
0 lower at 35 d. The current study did not show a change in FCR
WI, which may be due to the relationship between feed intake. Due to the lack of information of FCR based on WI, no study has reported FCR
WI; hence, this result did not show changes on experimental times but may be related to other variables.
3.6. Global Effects on Feed and Water Intake by Phase
The global effects of feed and water intake by production phase of chickens supplemented with MOEO are shown in
Table 7. The FI showed differences (P < 0.05) for starter and grower phases. In both phases, MOEO
12 showed the highest FI and WI, while MOEO
16 the lowest. Numerically (P > 0.05), WI in the grower and finisher phases was high for MOEO
12 and low for MOEO
16. Few studies have reported the use of essential oils during the production phases; however, Mousapour
et al. [
22] found differences in FCR
FI in the grower phase with savory plant essential oil at 150 mg/kg of feed. These differences may be due to age, animal management, dose supplied, diet composition and environmental factors [
23].
3.7. Overall Effect on Feed Conversion Ratio by Phase
The global effects on FCR
FI and FCR
WI of chickens supplemented with MOEO were not different (P > 0.05) between experimental groups (
Table 8). FCR
FI for three production phases was high for MOEO
16. MOEO
0 was low in the grower and finisher phases. In relation to FCR
WI, MOEO
16 was high in the starter and finisher phases, while the MOEO
56 group was low in the starter and grower phases. Silva-Vázquez
et al. [
20] obtained similar results for FCR
FI at 14 d with MOEO at 400 mg/kg. Similarly, Hernández-Coronado
et al. [
19] did not present differences with MOEOE at 200 mg/kg in the diet and water. This result may be due to the compounds found in MOEO that directly affect microorganism metabolism in the animalʼs digestive tract [
24]. Furthermore, intestinal physiology and metabolic pathways such as glycolysis could be affected by MOEO.
3.8. Overall Productivity
The overall productive efficiency (1 - 41 d) of broilers supplemented with MOEO showed that FCR
FI was affected (P < 0.05) by the treatments (
Table 9). MOEO
16 had the highest (lowest efficiency) overall FCR
FI, while MOEO
0 and MOEO
12 the lowest (best efficiency). The overall FCR
WI was not affected (P > 0.05) by the experimental groups. Hernandez-Coronado
et al. [
19] did not find differences between experimental groups in broilers supplemented with OEO at 200 mg/kg in the diet or water. The FCR
FI in the current study was similar to results of Betancourt
et al. [
14] using Colombian oregano at 100 mg/kg. These results confirm that the MOEO added in the different phases can improve productivity without being used continuously over 6 weeks of grow-out and can be used only over the first 2 weeks of grow-out.
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, MOEO at 100 mg/kg in the starter and grower phases (MOEO12 and MOEO34) improved the productive parameters of broiler chickens. The MOEO12 group had the best fed conversion ratio. The MOEO34 group had moderate water and feed intake, as well as improved the chicken final weight. The supplementation of MOEO in broiler diets can be recommended in the starter or grower phase to improve profitability and broiler productivity.
Author Contributions
investigation, data curation, writing-original draft preparation, Judith Alejandra S. Cuevas; validation, resources, funding acquisition, Jorge R. Kawas; methodology, investigation, Jimena Martínez-Rojas and Ana C. Hernández-Coronado; validation, data curation, visualization, Daniela S. Rico-Costilla and Victor E. Aguirre-Arzola; resources, visualization, supervision, Adolfo Soto-Domínguez; software, validation, formal analysis, writing-original draft preparation, writing-review and editing, Gerardo Mendez-Zamora.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The experiment was approved (ID 0426/2023) by the biosecurity, bioethics and animal welfare committee of the Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, UANL.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data were not deposited in a repository.
Acknowledgments
Authors acknowledge Michael E. Hume Ph.D. for reviewing and editing the manuscript. Additionally, we acknowledge Facultad de Agronomía, UANL, for supporting this study with experimental areas.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- Ruan, D.; Fan, Q.; Fouad, AM.; Sun, Y.; Huang, S.; Wu, A.; Lin, C.; Kuang; Zhang, C.; Jiang, S. Effects of dietary oregano essential oil supplementation on growth performance, intestinal antioxidative capacity, immunity, and intestinal microbiota in yellow-feathered chickens. J Anim Sci. 2021, 99, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Babatunde, O.O.; Bello, A.; Dersjant-Li, Y.; Adeola, O. Evaluation of the responses of broiler chickens to varying concentrations of phytate phosphorus and phytase. Grower phase (day 12-23 post hatching). Poultry Sci. 2022, 101, 101616. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. Helping minimize the misuse of antibiotics in farmed poultry in Ukraine. Available online: https://www.fao.org/support-to-investment/news/detail/en/c/1677564/ (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Ghazanfari, S.; Mohammad, Z.; Adib, M. Effects of coriander essential oil on the performance, blood characteristics, intestinal microbiota and histological of broilers. Braz J Poult Sci. 2015, 17, 419–426. [Google Scholar]
- Chowdhury, S.; Prasad, G.; Kumar, A. Different essential oils in diets of chickens: 1. Growth performance, nutrient utilization, nitrogen excretion, carcass traits and chemical composition of meat. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2018, 236, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Zamora, N.; Silva-Vázquez, R.; Rangel-Nava, Z.E.; Hernández-Martínez, C.A.; Kawas-Garza, J.R.; Hume, M.E.; Herrera-Balandrano, D.D.; Méndez-Zamora, G. Inulina de agave y aceite de orégano mejoran la productividad de pollos de engorda. Ecosis Recursos Agropecuarios. 2019, 6, 523–534. [Google Scholar]
- Meligy, A.M.; El-Hamid, M.; Yonis, A.E.; Elhaddad, G.Y.; Abdel-Raheem, S.M.; El-Ghareeb, W.R.; Mohamed, M.H.A.; Ismail, H.; Ibrahim, D. Liposomal encapsulated oregano, cinnamon, and clove oils enhanced the performance, bacterial metabolites antioxidant potential, and intestinal microbiota of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2023, 102, 102683. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Lee, K.W.; Everts, H.; Beynen, A.C. Essential oils in broiler nutrition. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2004, 3, 738–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mora, J.; Tamayo, J.A.; Cardona, C.A. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of essential oil extraction from Oregano (Origanum vulgare) and Rosemary (Rosmarínus officinalis) in Colombia. J Clean Prod. 2016, 112, 172–181. [Google Scholar]
- Bahakaim, H.A.; Elsayed, O.A.; Fadl, A.A.; AbdEltoab, F. Effect of dietary oregano supplementation on productive, physiological and immunological performance of broiler chicks. Egypt Poult Sci. 2020, 40, 507–524. [Google Scholar]
- INEGI. Compendio de Información Geográfica Municipal. Available online: https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/areasgeograficas/?ag=07000019#collapse-Resumen (accessed on 30 September 2025).
- NOM-062-ZOO-1999. Norma Oficial Mexicana. Especificaciones técnicas para la producción, cuidado y uso de animales de laboratorio. Available online: https://platiica.economia.gob.mx/normalizacion/nom-062-zoo-1999/ (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Minitab 17 Statistical Software. 2013. Minitab, LLC. State College, PA, USA.
- Betancourt, L.; Hume, M.; Rodríguez, F.; Nisbet, D.; Sohail, M.U.; Afanador, G. Effects of Colombian oregano essential oil (Lippia origanoides Kunth) and Eimeria species on broiler production and cecal microbiota. Poult Sci. 2019, 98, 4777–4786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cázares-Gallegos, R.; Silva-Vázquez, R.; Hernández-Martínez, C.A.; Gutiérrez-Soto, J.G.; Kawas-Garza, J.R.; Hume, M.E.; Méndez-Zamora, G.M. Performance, carcass variables, and meat quality of broilers supplemented with dietary Mexican oregano oil. Braz J Poult Sci. 2019, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.Y.; Peng, Q.Y.; Liu, Y.R.; Ma, Q.G.; Zhang, J.Y.; Guo, Y.P.; Xue, Z.; Zhao, L.H. Effects of oregano essential oil as an antibiotic growth promoter alternative on growth performance, antioxidant status, and intestinal health of broilers. J Poult Sci. 2021, 100, 101163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Méndez-Zamora, G.; Durán-Meléndez, L.A.; Hume, M.E.; Silva-Vázquez, R. Performance, blood parameters, and carcass yield of broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil. R Bras Zootec. 2017, 46, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adewole, D.I.; Oladokun, S.; Santin, Effect of organic acids -essential oils blend and oat fiber combination on broiler chicken growth performance, blood parameters, and intestinal health. Anim Nutr. 2021, 7, 1039–1051. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hernández-Coronado, A.C.; Silva-Vázquez, R.; Rangel-Nava, Z.E.; Hernández-Martínez, C.A.; Kawas-Garza, J.R.; Hume, M.E.; Méndez-Zamora, G. Mexican oregano essential oils given in drinking water on performance, carcass traits, and meat quality of broilers. Poult Sci. 2019, 98, 3050–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Silva Vázquez, R.; Duran Meléndez, L.A.; Santellano Estrada, E.; Rodríguez Muela, C.; Villalobos Villalobos, G.; Méndez Zamora, G.; Hume, M.E. Effects of two sources of Mexican oregano oil on performance, blood profile, carcass variables, and meat of broilers. R Bras Zootec. 2015, 44, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moharreri, M.; Vakili, R.; Oskoueian, E.; Rajabzadeh, G. Effects of microencapsulated essential oils on growth performance and biomarkers of inflammation in broiler chickens challenged with salmonella enteritidis. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2022, 21, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mousapour, A.; Salarmoini, M.; Afsharmanesh, M.; Ebrahimnejad, H.; Meimandipour, A. Efficacy of savory essential oil utilization in conventional and encapsulated forms on performance of broiler chickens. Braz J Poult Sci. 2020, 22, 001–012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Z.; Zhang, S.; Wang, H.; Piao, X. Essential oil and aromatic plants as feed additives in non-ruminant nutrition: a review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2015, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cui, H.; Zhang, C.; Li, C.; Lin, L. Antibacterial mechanism of oregano essential oil. Ind Crop Prod. 2019, 139, 111498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1.
Composition of diets supplemented with Mexican oregano essential oil in the production phases during grow-out.
Table 1.
Composition of diets supplemented with Mexican oregano essential oil in the production phases during grow-out.
| Ingredients (kg/ton) |
Production Phase Diets |
| Starter |
Grower |
Finisher |
| Corn, ground |
523.06 |
572.92 |
623.42 |
| Soybean meal |
406.00 |
354.00 |
302.00 |
| Soybean oil |
26.00 |
32.00 |
35.00 |
| Calcium carbonate |
14.00 |
12.00 |
12.00 |
| Monocalcium phosphate |
9.75 |
8.50 |
7.25 |
| NaCl |
4.10 |
4.40 |
4.40 |
| L-lysine |
1.18 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
| DL-methionine |
2.98 |
2.63 |
2.38 |
| L-Threonine |
0.43 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
| Starter premix1
|
12.50 |
0 |
0 |
| Grower premix2
|
0 |
12.50 |
0 |
| Finisher premix3
|
0 |
0 |
12.50 |
| Nutrient composition |
| Moisture, % |
10.34 |
11.82 |
11.79 |
| Metabolizable energy, Kcal/kg4
|
3,004 |
3,081 |
3,146 |
| Crude protein, % |
23.00 |
21.40 |
19.00 |
| Crude fiber, % |
2.48 |
2.84 |
2.64 |
| Ash, % |
5.86 |
5.59 |
5.30 |
| Crude fat, % |
3.91 |
4.46 |
5.60 |
| Non-digestible fiber, % |
8.55 |
8.87 |
9.18 |
| Calcium, % |
1.07 |
0.97 |
0.88 |
| Phosphorus, % |
0.72 |
0.6 |
0.56 |
| Magnesium, % |
0.27 |
0.26 |
0.23 |
| Lysine, % |
1.43 |
1.28 |
1.17 |
| Digestible lysine, %4
|
1.30 |
1.16 |
1.06 |
| Methionine + cysteine, %4
|
1.05 |
0.98 |
0.9 |
| Digestible methionine + cysteine, %4
|
0.98 |
0.91 |
0.84 |
| Methionine, %4
|
0.68 |
0.63 |
0.58 |
| Digestible methionine, %4
|
0.67 |
0.61 |
0.56 |
| Threonine, %4
|
0.97 |
0.87 |
0.79 |
| Digestible threonine, %4
|
0.86 |
0.77 |
0.69 |
Table 2.
Weight performance of broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
Table 2.
Weight performance of broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
| Treatment1
|
Starter |
Grower |
Finisher |
| 7 |
14 |
21 |
28 |
35 |
41 |
| MOEO0
|
0.175 |
0.473 |
0.949 |
1.459 |
1.943 |
2.442 |
| MOEO12
|
0.177 |
0.473 |
0.964 |
1.500 |
1.978 |
2.462 |
| MOEO34
|
0.174 |
0.469 |
0.971 |
1.484 |
2.005 |
2.495 |
| MOEO56
|
0.174 |
0.472 |
0.964 |
1.461 |
1.969 |
2.486 |
| MOEO16
|
0.172 |
0.469 |
0.972 |
1.467 |
1.946 |
2.468 |
| SEM |
0.003 |
0.008 |
0.012 |
0.024 |
0.04 |
0.066 |
| P-value |
0.718 |
0.917 |
0.701 |
0.381 |
0.896 |
0.918 |
Table 3.
Feed intake of broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
Table 3.
Feed intake of broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
| Treatment1
|
Starter |
Grower |
Finisher |
| 7 |
14 |
21 |
28 |
35 |
41 |
| MOEO0
|
0.152 |
0.441ab
|
0.733 |
0.961ab
|
0.931 |
0.973 |
| MOEO12
|
0.162 |
0.470a
|
0.757 |
0.980a
|
0.941 |
0.924 |
| MOEO34
|
0.151 |
0.453ab
|
0.771 |
0.888b
|
0.962 |
0.905 |
| MOEO56
|
0.151 |
0.447ab
|
0.726 |
0.897b
|
0.931 |
0.937 |
| MOEO16
|
0.147 |
0.413b
|
0.725 |
0.886b
|
0.902 |
0.921 |
| SEM |
0.004 |
0.011 |
0.020 |
0.021 |
0.028 |
0.039 |
| P-value |
0.118 |
0.051 |
0.444 |
0.006 |
0.869 |
0.653 |
Table 4.
Water intake of broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
Table 4.
Water intake of broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
| Traeatment1
|
Starter |
Grower |
Finisher |
| 7 |
14 |
21 |
28 |
35 |
41 |
| MOEO0
|
0.444 |
0.921 |
1.341 |
1.926 |
1.993 |
1.925 |
| MOEO12
|
0.471 |
0.920 |
1.528 |
1.952 |
1.943 |
2.063 |
| MOEO34
|
0.448 |
0.951 |
1.443 |
1.910 |
2.121 |
1.810 |
| MOEO56
|
0.457 |
0.939 |
1.445 |
1.948 |
2.018 |
1.982 |
| MOEO16
|
0.409 |
0.882 |
1.430 |
1.970 |
1.792 |
2.069 |
| SEM |
0.016 |
0.040 |
0.054 |
0.052 |
0.138 |
0.108 |
| P-value |
0.209 |
0.888 |
0.413 |
0.903 |
0.746 |
0.478 |
Table 5.
Feed conversion based on feed intake of broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
Table 5.
Feed conversion based on feed intake of broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
| Treatment1
|
Starter |
Grower |
Finisher |
| 7 |
14 |
21 |
28 |
35 |
41 |
| MOEO0
|
0.827 |
0.679xy
|
0.653 |
0.532 |
0.513 |
0.594 |
| MOEO12
|
0.797 |
0.630y
|
0.651 |
0.547 |
0.509 |
0.612 |
| MOEO34
|
0.825 |
0.657xy
|
0.656 |
0.579 |
0.542 |
0.631 |
| MOEO56
|
0.817 |
0.668xy
|
0.679 |
0.553 |
0.543 |
0.642 |
| MOEO16
|
0.844 |
0.721x
|
0.694 |
0.56 |
0.528 |
0.660 |
| SEM |
0.021 |
0.020 |
0.021 |
0.020 |
0.025 |
0.031 |
| P-value |
0.677 |
0.073 |
0.577 |
0.585 |
0.824 |
0.697 |
Table 6.
Feed conversion ratio based on water intake in broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
Table 6.
Feed conversion ratio based on water intake in broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
| Treatment1
|
Starter |
Grower |
Finisher |
| 7 |
14 |
21 |
28 |
35 |
41 |
| MOEO0
|
0.283 |
0.327 |
0.360 |
0.265 |
0.242 |
0.257 |
| MOEO12
|
0.274 |
0.324 |
0.329 |
0.274 |
0.250 |
0.243 |
| MOEO34
|
0.278 |
0.313 |
0.349 |
0.269 |
0.250 |
0.270 |
| MOEO56
|
0.272 |
0.320 |
0.341 |
0.255 |
0.253 |
0.262 |
| MOEO16
|
0.304 |
0.339 |
0.351 |
0.253 |
0.276 |
0.257 |
| SEM |
0.009 |
0.013 |
0.013 |
0.009 |
0.018 |
0.020 |
| P-value |
0.190 |
0.683 |
0.595 |
0.436 |
0.786 |
0.952 |
Table 7.
Overall productivity of feed and water intake in broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
Table 7.
Overall productivity of feed and water intake in broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
| Variables/Treatments1
|
Starter |
Grower |
Finisher |
| FI (kg) |
|
|
|
| MOEO0
|
0.593ab
|
1.69xy
|
1.90 |
| MOEO12
|
0.632a
|
1.74x
|
1.86 |
| MOEO34
|
0.604ab
|
1.66xy
|
1.87 |
| MOEO56
|
0.599ab
|
1.62xy
|
1.87 |
| MOEO16
|
0.560b
|
1.61y
|
1.82 |
| EEM |
0.013 |
0.032 |
0.060 |
| P- value |
0.029 |
0.068 |
0.911 |
| WI (L) |
|
|
|
| MOEO0
|
1.37 |
3.27 |
3.92 |
| MOEO12
|
1.39 |
3.48 |
4.01 |
| MOEO34
|
1.40 |
3.35 |
3.93 |
| MOEO56
|
1.40 |
3.39 |
4.00 |
| MOEO16
|
1.29 |
3.40 |
3.86 |
| SEM |
0.046 |
0.089 |
0.198 |
| P- value |
0.677 |
0.581 |
0.992 |
Table 8.
Global feed conversion rates of feed and water intake in broilers supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
Table 8.
Global feed conversion rates of feed and water intake in broilers supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
| Variables/Treatments1
|
Starter |
Grower |
Finisher |
| FCRFI
|
|
|
|
| MOEO0
|
0.753 |
0.592 |
0.511 |
| MOEO12
|
0.713 |
0.599 |
0.517 |
| MOEO34
|
0.741 |
0.617 |
0.541 |
| MOEO56
|
0.743 |
0.616 |
0.546 |
| MOEO16
|
0.782 |
0.627 |
0.547 |
| SEM |
0.017 |
0.012 |
0.021 |
| P- value |
0.183 |
0.273 |
0.702 |
| FCRWI
|
|
|
|
| MOEO0
|
0.305 |
0.313 |
0.249 |
| MOEO12
|
0.299 |
0.302 |
0.246 |
| MOEO34
|
0.296 |
0.309 |
0.260 |
| MOEO56
|
0.296 |
0.298 |
0.257 |
| MOEO16
|
0.321 |
0.302 |
0.266 |
| SEM |
0.008 |
0.009 |
0.014 |
| P- value |
0.244 |
0.798 |
0.791 |
Table 9.
Feed conversion ratio based on feed intake for broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
Table 9.
Feed conversion ratio based on feed intake for broiler chickens supplemented with Mexican oregano oil during the different production phases.
| Treatments1
|
Variables2
|
| FI (kg) |
WI (L) |
FCRFI
|
FCRWI
|
| MOEO0
|
4.191 |
8.55 |
0.582b
|
0.285 |
| MOEO12
|
4.234 |
8.88 |
0.581b
|
0.279 |
| MOEO34
|
4.129 |
8.68 |
0.604ab
|
0.288 |
| MOEO56
|
4.090 |
8.79 |
0.607ab
|
0.282 |
| AEO16
|
3.990 |
8.55 |
0.618a
|
0.289 |
| SEM |
0.084 |
0.268 |
0.008 |
0.007 |
| P-value |
0.333 |
0.915 |
0.017 |
0.731 |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).