Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

A One Health Perspective: Occurrence Study of Carbapenem-Resistant Bacteria and Other Emerging Pathogens from Recycled Wastewater Used in Agriculture

Submitted:

30 September 2025

Posted:

08 October 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

A Recycled wastewater is vital for circular economy, especially on water-scarce islands. This study explored the presence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales and other emerging pathogens in irrigation water on four Canarian Islands, applying a One Health perspective. Using membrane filtration and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, 69 bacterial isolates were identified. The finding reveals that 50% were gram-negative bacilli like Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., while 30% were Enterobacteriaceae, including Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. The main mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter were oxacillinases, followed by metallo-β-lactamases (MBL). In Enterobacteriaceae, characterization of carbapenemase types was less frequent, with OXA-48 being the most prevalent. The detection of multidrug-resistant organisms in recycled wastewater highlights an urgent need for routine microbiological monitoring in water management protecting public health and agricultural sustainability.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Water stress constitutes a critical challenge for many countries, with implications for present and future generations [1,2]. Currently, over 2.4 billion individuals reside in regions experiencing water scarcity. The confluence of high population density, recurrent droughts, and anthropogenic pressures exacerbates environmental vulnerability, particularly in isolated regions such as oceanic islands [3,4,5].
Waterborne pathogens in aquatic ecosystems are already responsible for hundreds of millions of human illness cases annually [6]. Emerging evidence indicates that climate change is exacerbating this burden by promoting the proliferation and impact of numerous pathogenic microorganisms [7,8,9]. Monitoring the health effects associated with these hazards remains challenging, as many waterborne diseases are either undetected or underreported [8]. Furthermore, risks are expected to escalate in response to global warming, intensified precipitation events, and the increasing frequency of floods [9].
One of the primary solutions to the global water crisis lies in improving irrigation systems for agriculture, which accounts for nearly 72% of global freshwater withdrawals [10,11,12,13]. One effective approach to mitigating water scarcity is wastewater reuse. Recycled wastewater undergoes physicochemical and biological treatments to comply with regulatory standards for different end-uses [14,15,16,17]. Despite undergoing treatment, recycled wastewater may still harbor pathogenic microorganisms, including multidrug-resistant bacteria. The overuse of antibiotics, coupled with insufficient wastewater treatment, has led to the dissemination of antibiotic residues into the environment [18,19,20,21]. This disruption of the One Health paradigm poses significant risks to human, animal, and ecosystem health [22,23]. Recycled wastewater, often reused for agricultural purposes, can contain a complex mixture of contaminants, including pathogenic microorganisms, heavy metals, and contaminants of emerging concern (CECs). These substances may pose direct threats to human and animal health and, in the case of CECs, potential long-term risks to ecosystems [24]. Agricultural reuse of recycled wastewater inherently connects multiple environmental compartments—such as wastewater treatment plants, surface water, groundwater, soil, and crops—facilitating the transfer and persistence of these contaminants. Consequently, the consumption of crops irrigated with contaminated water represents a tangible, non-negligible risk to human health [25].
The World Health Organization (WHO) considers bacterial resistance as a major global health threat due to the alarming rise in infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria, both in healthcare settings and in the community [26]. Multidrug-resistant bacteria are defined as those exhibiting resistance to one or more antibiotics from at least three distinct classes [27]. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are continuously released into aquatic environments, with hospital effluents recognized as important contributors to the spread of antimicrobial resistance beyond clinical settings [28]. Among the most concerning forms of antimicrobial resistance is carbapenem resistance, mediated by carbapenemase production and transmitted via plasmids among bacteria of various species [26]. These plasmids often carry genes conferring resistance to other antibiotics belonging to different antibiotic families [29,30,31]. The widespread use of carbapenems has driven the emergence of resistance to this critical group of antimicrobial drugs [32].
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and their associated disinfection process’s function are critical barriers to limit the environmental dissemination of ARB [33,34]. Following discharge from the treatment plant into recycled water and storage facilities for reuse, recycled water is generally not subjected to systematic sanitary monitoring. Previous studies have demonstrated that the quality of recycled water exhibits variability throughout the distribution network, and it has been observed that its characteristics may change prior to use at different locations, such as within pipelines, storage tanks, and other points along the system. [35] It has been widely documented that one of the main factors contributing to variability in recycled water quality is the formation of biofilms within distribution systems. Biofilm development is generated by multiple interacting factors and environmental conditions. Furthermore, several studies have highlighted the role of biofilms as potential sinks for ARGs in aquatic ecosystems [36,37,38,39].
The variability observed in recycled water quality can be attributed to the multifactorial interactions between treatment performance and post-treatment management practices. Key determinants include storage conditions, which exert a strong influence on microbial persistence, regrowth, and community shifts, as well as geographic and hydrological drivers—such as the high agricultural demand characteristic of certain regions—that impose additional stress on water reuse systems [7,8]. Furthermore, the structural and operational attributes of distribution infrastructures, particularly the reliance on open reservoirs, extended retention times, and long conveyance networks, have been consistently associated with conditions favorable to biofilm development [35]. The subsequent establishment of biofilms not only facilitates the diversification and stabilization of microbial communities but also poses potential risks for water quality deterioration and the persistence and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) within aquatic environments [40].
In response to these challenges, the Methodological Spanish Guide for the Development of Recycled Water Risk Management Plans for Agricultural Use was developed in 2024 [41]. This framework seeks to provide robust technical criteria that enable more reliable, safe, and sustainable management of recycled water resources, while also integrating considerations of microbial ecology, infrastructure resilience, and agricultural water demand. However, although progress has been made with the development of these guidelines, the absence of binding regulatory frameworks mandating their adoption represents a major limitation for their practical implementation and constitutes a significant barrier to their systematic application.
The absence of post-treatment surveillance in recycled water may constitute a potential public health risk, particularly in contexts where recycled water is likely to come into direct contact with human populations [25]. It is important to underscore that climate change is profoundly altering the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of aquatic systems, including storage tanks, which are subjected to extreme temperature fluctuations. These alterations may adversely affect human health and socioeconomic stability by disrupting aquatic microbial communities [7,8,9].
Although wastewater and WWTPs have been extensively investigated to assess the prevalence of ARB the contribution of recycled water storage practices to the dissemination of ARB remains comparatively underexplored. This study aims to determine the prevalence of emerging and carbapenemase-producing bacteria in recycled wastewater samples collected from irrigation points for agriculture in water-stressed oceanic islands.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study area and fieldwork

This study was carried out in the Canary Islands Archipelago (Spain), located in the Atlantic Ocean near the African coast. The Canary Islands have different water necessities between islands, with some experiencing water stress. Desertification, high population density (278.77 inhabitants/km2), tourism (17.77 millions of tourists in 2024), insufficient rainfall, water losses in network or inadequate management are among the stressors contributing to a water demand that exceeds supply [42,43,44].
The easternmost islands from the Canary Islands demonstrate the greatest water stress, demanding the use of recycled wastewater and desalinisation, also in agriculture [42,45]. Currently, agricultural production on these territories relies heavily on non-conventional water resources [46].
In each water stress island, 5 different sampling points were taken from agricultural water storage for irrigation. Samples were assigned numbers according to the following order: Fuerteventura (B1, B2, B3, B4 and B5), Lanzarote (B6, B7, B8, B9 and B10), Gran Canaria (B11, B12, B13, B14 and B15) and Tenerife (B16, B17, B18, B19 and B20) (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. The sampled islands and sampled number that employ recycled wastewater for irrigation due the water stress.
Figure 1. The sampled islands and sampled number that employ recycled wastewater for irrigation due the water stress.
Preprints 178912 g001
Samples were collected between 13th October and 29th of November 2023 from the irrigation outlet of each water storage tank. Samples were collected in sterilized 500 mL bottles, ensuring the exclusion of air contact, and transported to the laboratory of Preventive Medicine and Public Health of University of La Laguna, Tenerife, for analysis within 24 hours in accordance with the guidelines outlined in Regulation (EU) 2020/741 for bacteriological analysis.

2.2. Microbial Culturing

From the initial sample volume, only 10 mL were used to prepare four serial tenfold dilutions for each sampling point, yielding a final dilution of 10⁻⁴. Owing to the anticipated high bacterial growth and to prevent filter biofouling a 10 mL aliquot from each dilution was passed through a 0.45 µm membrane filter, using the membrane filtration method. The filters were then incubated on selective and differential media: Tergitol® 7 Agar OXOID at 44°C and Slanetz-Bartley Agar Base (Scharlau, Sentmenat, Spain), thiosulfate-citrate-bile-sucrose (TCBS) Agar OXOID®, and MacConkey M3 OXOID® at 37°C for 24 hours.
These media were used to isolate E. coli, Enterococcus spp., Vibrio spp., and Gram-negative bacilli, respectively. Filters yielding 20-80 colony-forming-units (CFU) were selected for repeat the process in triplicate further incubation over 24 hours. The most probable number (MPN) per 100 mL was determined for each microorganism.

2.3. Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Once pure isolates were obtained, they were subsequently were performed to the species or genus level using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry MALDI-TOF MSMALDI-TOF MS. (VITEK-MS, bioMerieux, France) automated system as previous described by Ashfaq et al. (2022) and Puljko et al. (2024) [47,48]. Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) were screened for carbapenemase production using CHROMID CARBA SMART agar as previous other studied was carried [49,50]. Colonies exhibiting typical growth were then confirmed and characterized using the ROSCO Diagnostica KPC, MBL and Oxacillinase detection kits [51]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. were also tested for these carbapenemase types (Sun et al., 2017) [52]. Vancomycin susceptibility of Enterococcus was determined using the disk diffusion method using vancomycin disc and Muller-Hinton agar, according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines [53]. Diameters of inhibition halos surrounding the disc were measured and expressed in millimeters. Results were interpreted as sensitive, intermediate or resistant, following the EUCAST criteria [53].

3. Results and Discussion

Focusing on the analysis of bacterial isolates obtained from the irrigation outlets sampled on each island, the results of the microbial diversity observed in each recycled wastewater irrigation outlet are represented in Fig. 2. The figure displays the microbial counts (CFU/mL) for each irrigation outlet grouped by island. Each bar represents a different outlet, allowing for a visual comparison of microbial load across sampling sites. The colors represented in the bars of the bar chart correspond to the different species isolated, with the bar height indicating the number of CFU per 100 ml. The graph also includes a line that indicates the number of isolations. Also, information on each bacterial isolation and the microbiological counts (CFU/100 ml) are extensively presented in Supplementary Materials (tables 1, 2, 3, and 4) .
Figure 2. Bacterial isolates from island irrigation outlets. Y-axis: Number of isolates. X-axis: Irrigation outlet sampling points. Colors indicate different bacterial species (see legend). Blue line: Total bacterial isolates per sampling point.
Figure 2. Bacterial isolates from island irrigation outlets. Y-axis: Number of isolates. X-axis: Irrigation outlet sampling points. Colors indicate different bacterial species (see legend). Blue line: Total bacterial isolates per sampling point.
Preprints 178912 g002
Notably, outlet 11 from Gran Canaria Island exhibited the highest density and diversity of microorganisms, with a total of eight distinct species identified (Acinetobacter pitii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia hermanii, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, and Aeromonas salmonicida). The high prevalence of microorganisms and the elevated microbiological load observed on the island may be associated with multiple factors, the influence of which has not yet been fully elucidated. One potential explanation is the inadequate management of storage tanks, which could facilitate the proliferation of microbial agents. In addition, climatic conditions constitute a critical factor that is difficult to control; semi-tropical temperatures, favorable for microbial growth, combined with environmental variability, may enhance biofilm formation, microbial dispersal, and the emergence of these organisms.
In addition, the intensive livestock activity characteristic of Gran Canaria is a relevant factor to consider. According to data from the Canary Islands Institute of Statistics (ISTAC, 2024), this island, with a surface area of 156,151.87 hectares, reported 87,523 heads of livestock. This figure is particularly noteworthy when compared with Tenerife, the largest island in the archipelago (203,352 hectares), where 75,367 livestock animals were reported in the same year [54]. The high livestock density in Gran Canaria, relative to its available area, may be associated with an increased propagation and persistence of microorganisms in the environment.
To enhance the visualization of microbial isolates in the irrigation outlets, Fig. 3 depicts the outlets where microorganisms were detected, with each outlet represented by a distinct color.
Figure 3. Details the recurring microbial species isolated from various irrigation outlets.
Figure 3. Details the recurring microbial species isolated from various irrigation outlets.
Preprints 178912 g003
Dominant among these were E. faecalis, followed by K. pneumoniae. These species are frequently encountered in treated wastewater due to their common origin in the human gut microbiome. While recycled wastewater regulations often prioritize E. coli as an indicator organism, this does not preclude the presence of other potential pathogens [55,56,57]. The presence of Enterococcus spp. especially E. faecalis, and Enterobacteriaceae, which are commonly found in the intestinal microbiota of mammals, indicated fecal contamination in the water bodies [56,57,58,59]. In many countries, the detection of E. coli serves as a specific marker for fecal contamination from human, animal, or untreated wastewater sources. According to Regulation EU 2020/741 on minimum requirements for water reuse, recycled wastewater for agricultural use is restricted to a maximum of 100 CFU/100 ml of E. coli, while the WHO has established guidelines primarily focused on E. coli within the Enterobacteriaceae family [60,61].
Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium represent a significant clinical challenge in hospital settings, as they are capable of rapidly spreading within healthcare environments and causing infections that are notoriously difficult to treat. Data from the 2023 European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) indicate that 19.8% of E. faecium isolates and 24.3% of E. faecalis isolates were resistant to vancomycin [62]. These findings underscore the importance of implementing environmental surveillance strategies to detect potential reservoirs of resistance, thereby contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of its dissemination pathways.
From a total of 69 isolates, 32 corresponded to different microorganisms. The predominant groups identified were Gram-negative bacilli (34 isolates, 50%) Enterobacteriaceae (20 isolates, 30%), and Gram-positive bacteria (15 isolates, 22%). Within the Gram-negative bacilli group, non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli accounted for 25 isolates (75%), the most relevant being Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6 isolates, 18%), Acinetobacter pittii (3 isolates, 9%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (3 isolates, 9%). The counts of the isolates mentioned are presented in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.
Among the Enterobacteriaceae, table 2 shows that Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most prevalent species, representing 35% of the isolates (7/20). This was followed by Escherichia hermannii (25%, 5 isolates), Escherichia coli (15%, 3 isolates), and Enterobacter cloacae (10%, 2 isolates), highlighting a predominance of clinically relevant opportunistic pathogens in the irrigation outlets.
Among the Gram-positive bacteria, table 3 shows that Enterococcus spp. represented the most relevant genus, with 10 isolates (66%). Notably, Enterococcus faecalis accounted for the majority of these (9 isolates, 90%), positioning it as the most frequently recovered species in this study and underscoring its clinical relevance as a well-recognized opportunistic pathogen.
The ESKAPE group—an acronym proposed by Rice in 2008 to designate Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp.—encompasses pathogens of critical clinical relevance. These microorganisms account for a significant global burden of morbidity and mortality, particularly within healthcare settings, where they are leading causes of severe and frequently fatal nosocomial infections. Beyond their clinical impact, the ability of ESKAPE pathogens to persist in environmental reservoirs and disseminate across human, animal, and ecological domains highlights their importance within the One Health framework and emphasizes the urgent need for integrated strategies aimed at surveillance, prevention, and control. [63].
Analysis of bacterial isolation from recycled wastewater intended for agricultural use revealed significant heterogeneity in bacterial composition among different islands, and even within individual islands, depending on the specific water outlet. Pathogens variability may be attributed to water storage and exposure to open storage tanks accessible to wild animals, domestic animals, or farm animals that may inhabit the vicinity of the storage area. Given the predominantly open-air water storage conditions, it is imperative to establish regulatory limits not only at the treatment plant discharge point but also to implement comprehensive hygiene and sanitation guidelines for water storage practices by farmers.
To elucidate the carbapenem-resistance mechanisms identified in this study, Table 4 presents the distribution of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli isolates and their associated resistance mechanisms (KPC, MBL, OXA-48, ESBL with porin loss, and AmpC with porin loss) by island and irrigation point. A total of 34 microorganisms has been found in 14 of the 20 irrigation outlets sampling points.
Regarding antibiotic resistance, all enterococcal and staphylococcal isolated were susceptible to vancomycin, which aligns with the low prevalence of this resistance reported in Canary Islands hospitals [64]. Among Gram-negative bacilli (n=53), 64% demonstrated non-intrinsic carbapenem resistance. Enterobacteriaceae accounted for 24% of these resistant isolates and were most prevalent in Gran Canaria. According to the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS), Escherichia coli represents one of the principal pathogens associated with antibiotic resistance. Data from 76 countries in 2022 indicated that 42% of Escherichia coli isolates exhibited resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, while 35% demonstrated resistance to methicillin. Klebsiella pneumoniae ranked second in prevalence, with both species belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae. These bacteria, along with other members of the same family, are major contributors to a broad spectrum of intestinal infections [65]. Carbapenems are frequently employed as the last line of therapy against multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. However, over the past decade, numerous studies have reported the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, mediated by diverse resistance mechanisms [48].
The role of the environment as a reservoir and vehicle for the dissemination of resistance genes has been increasingly investigated in recent years. Hospital wastewater has been identified as a major hotspot, facilitating the horizontal transfer of resistance genes. For instance, a study conducted in India reported the isolation of an Escherichia coli strain producing NDM-4, harboring the bleomycin resistance gene (bleMBL) on a plasmid associated with the complete IS Aba125 sequence, suggesting that hospital effluents represent an important reservoir of resistance determinants. Similarly, the release of antibiotics into municipal wastewater, together with human excretions, contributes to the selection of such bacteria in surface and/or groundwater. Supporting evidence includes the detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains producing VIM-1 in rivers in Spain [66].
There is also evidence of the transmission of resistance genes among Enterobacteriaceae strains in agriculture–aquaculture interface systems, as reflected in a recent study in Egypt on the presence of β-lactamases and CRE, where several resistant Enterobacteriaceae strains were isolated, predominantly carrying the carbapenem-resistance gene blaKPC, either alone or in combination with β-lactamase genes (blaCTX-M-15, blaSHV, blaTEM, and blaPER-1) [67].
In this study P.aeruginosa, A. baumannii, and Enterobacteriaceae, pathogens classified as critical priority by the WHO, were detected. Additionally, it is important to highlight the presence of primary pathogens such as Vibrio cholerae (Gran Canaria), diverse Aeromonas spp., and Burkholderia cepacia complex (Lanzarote and Fuerteventura). This bacterium is widely distributed across diverse environmental settings and is characterized by remarkable metabolic flexibility, together with a high mutation rate that facilitates adaptation. These traits enable it to persist under nutrient-limited conditions and even to exploit certain antimicrobials as a carbon source. From an epidemiological perspective, it is mainly associated with opportunistic infections in immunocompromised individuals, particularly in patients with cystic fibrosis [68].
Expanding the scope of investigation to a broader spectrum of pathogens reveals the significant public health threat posed by multidrug-resistant microorganisms, particularly those exhibiting carbapenem resistance. The facile transfer of resistance genes [22] among these pathogens underscores the importance of adopting a One Health perspective to mitigate the escalating global crisis of antibiotic resistance [22]. Indeed, authors such as Peter et al.2017 have reported the transmission of blaVIM resistance genes from Pseudomonas putida isolates to Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the former being primarily associated with environmental niches and the latter representing a pathogen of major clinical importance [69].
The carbapenem resistance profile is quite alarming since we have detected that over 64% of the isolates presented resistance, with 24% of them being Enterobacteriaceae and 38% of these being produced by the presence of OXA-48 and KPC carbapenemases, which coincides.
Most of isolates microorganisms were identified as NFGNB consistent with their prevalence in environmental niches. However, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii, which are more commonly associated with clinical settings, were also detected. Highlight that P. aeruginosa is one of the main pathogens that cause nosocomial infections, primarily affecting immunocompromised patients, those with invasive devices, severe burns, and post-surgical patients [70,71]. The main resistance mechanisms identified in Pseudomonas aeruginosa in our study were two isolates producing metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) and two isolates producing KPC-type carbapenemases. These findings are of particular clinical relevance due to their significant impact on therapeutic options. In recent years, Spain has reported an increasing number of MBL-producing strains, particularly of the VIM and IMP types [72]. This trend has been associated with the growing detection of resistance to novel agents used in the management of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa, such as ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam(CZA) [73,74].
Similarly, the use of CZA has led to the emergence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains resistant to this antibiotic, a phenomenon in which several resistance mechanisms have been described that directly compromise its efficacy. Among these, the emergence of KPC-type carbapenemase variants is particularly noteworthy [75]. In 2017, Shields et al. reported for the first time the development of resistance to CZA in patients infected with Klebsiella pneumoniae, attributed to mutations in the blaKPC-3 gene [76]In the case of P. aeruginosa, reports are relatively scarce; however, several KPC variants capable of conferring resistance to this antibiotic have been identified, such as blaKPC-31 [77].
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains possess multiple intrinsic resistance mechanisms against carbapenems, the most frequent being the alteration of outer membrane permeability through modifications or loss of the OprD porin. Additional mechanisms include the overexpression of efflux systems, the synthesis of carbapenemase enzymes capable of inactivating these compounds, and the hyperproduction of chromosomal AmpC β-lactamases [78,79,80]. Moreover, this species exhibits a remarkable ability to acquire additional resistance via horizontal transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes, which are often located within integrons and mobile genetic elements such as plasmids and transposons [80]. On the other hand A. baumannii is also associated with nosocomial infections, including bacteremia, pneumonia, and infections of the skin and urinary tract [81], mainly in critical care units as an opportunistic pathogen [82,83]. Acinetobacter baumannii can be able to withstand desiccation, exhibit tolerance to biocides, and remain viable even under conditions of limited nutrient availability [84,85]. Acinetobacter strains were isolated in Gran Canaria from four out of five irrigation outlets and in one outlet in Tenerife. Among these isolates, the primary resistance mechanism identified is the production of oxacilinases, enzymes that belong to the class D β-lactamases. In A. baumannii, six oxacilinase groups have been described to date: OXA-51, OXA-23, OXA-40/24, OXA-58, OXA-143, and OXA-48 [51,86,87]. Recent reports indicate that these strains have disseminated globally [87], causing hospital outbreaks in countries such as United States, Canada, Spain, among others [88]. Moreover, multidrug resistance is a common feature of this microorganism due to its extraordinary adaptive capacity. Acinetobacter baumannii isolates can acquire resistance through several mechanisms, including horizontal gene transfer, natural transformation, the emergence of mutations, and the mobilization of genetic elements that modulate the expression of intrinsic genes, such as blaOXA-51-like gene conferring carbapenem resistance, as well as through the acquisition of additional resistance genes [82,84,85,88].
Carbapenemase dissemination, predominantly nosocomial, has prompted a One Health investigation into broader transmission pathways, including hospital wastewater or undercooked food. Consequently, European regulatory frameworks are undergoing revision to encompass agricultural and food sectors in carbapenem resistance surveillance [83] . The detection of carbapenem-resistant environmental Pseudomonas species, such as P. putida and P. stutzeri, underscores their potential role as reservoirs for the horizontal transfer of carbapenemase genes to clinically significant pathogens like P. aeruginosa.
A One Health approach highlights the significance of P. aeruginosa, A.baumannii, and Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae as primary pathogens in human health. These microorganisms, classified as critical priority pathogens by the WHO [89], along with Vibrio cholerae non-O1/O139 strain, have been detected in recycled wastewater used for irrigation in Gran Canaria. This bacterium, has also been found predominantly in Mediterranean coastal lagoons [90]. Vibrio cholerae is a halophilic, Gram-negative, facultative anaerobic bacterium widely distributed in aquatic and estuarine environments. [91] Non-O1/non-O139 strains are not responsible for cholera, as they lack the cholera toxin; however, they are capable of colonizing the gastrointestinal tract, causing self-limiting acute gastroenteritis, and have also been linked to extraintestinal infections such as those of the biliary and urinary tracts, soft tissues, and skin, as well as bacteremia, pneumonia, meningitis, and otitis externa [91,92]. Although bacteremia due to these serogroups is relatively rare, studies indicate that it is associated with higher mortality compared to other V. cholerae infections, particularly in immunocompromised patients [93]. From a One Health perspective, the persistence of V. cholerae in aquatic environments, including irrigation water, raises important concerns regarding its potential role as an environmental reservoir and transmission pathway across human, animal, and ecosystem interfaces.
The detection of Aeromonas spp. in Fuerteventura and Tenerife, this genus is among the predominant bacterial groups in treated wastewater [94]. Specifically, the species Aeromonas hydrophila, A. caviae, and A. veronii are considered clinically relevant due to their pathogenic potential in humans. The infections they cause range from self-limiting gastroenteritis to more severe conditions affecting the heart, skin, eyes, and other organs, which can ultimately progress to fatal septicemia [95]. Moreover, multidrug resistance has been reported in Aeromonas spp. isolates obtained from fish as well as from various aquatic sources, including rivers and wastewater treatment plant effluents. These bacteria also exhibit intrinsic resistance mechanisms, supported by mutations in specific genes, efflux pump overexpression, and the acquisition of resistance determinants through horizontal gene transfer, all of which enhance their antimicrobial resistance capacity [96]. Aquatic habitats provide favorable conditions for the development of these processes. In addition, biofilm formation on aquatic environments has been documented, offering protection to the bacteria and facilitating the exchange of resistance genes [40]. Due to their characteristics, high prevalence in aquatic environments, and diverse antibiotic resistance mechanisms, this genus can serve as a valuable indicator of contamination and the dissemination of antibiotic resistance within aquatic ecosystems, including effluents from wastewater treatment plants. [97].
Underscores the importance of establishing rigorous standards for the hygienic quality of recycled wastewater used for irrigation, also under storage conditions, particularly when food contamination is at risk.
Limitations of this study
In cases where carbapenem resistance mechanisms could not be identified due to limitations of phenotypic techniques, sequencing methods were required. However, the study detected resistance mechanisms to β-lactam antibiotics, including MBL, KPC, and OXA-48, which significantly reduce therapeutic options for infections caused by these microorganisms. Our findings demonstrates that recycled wastewater used in agriculture can serve as a reservoir for these microorganisms and promote their dissemination, highlighting the importance of One Health policies and continued environmental surveillance to mitigate and control this public health threat.

4. Conclusions

In this study, E. coli levels in irrigation outlets were within the permitted values established by regulations for recycled water reuse in irrigation. However, elevated counts of other Enterobacteriaceae suggest the need to consider additional microbiological indicators to ensure public health. The isolation of Vibrio cholerae, Aeromonas veronii, and Aeromonas hydrophila underscores the importance of post-treatment for food irrigated with recycled wastewater stored in systems without hygienic control, especially when the edible part of the fruit or vegetable comes into direct contact with the irrigation water.
The results indicate that recycled wastewater stored for agricultural use can serve as a reservoir of carbapenem-resistant bacteria, potentially facilitating their dissemination from the environment to living organisms. To mitigate the spread of antimicrobial resistance, effective management and improved hygienic-sanitary conditions for recycled wastewater storage designated for agriculture irrigation are essential. Achieving this goal requires collaboration among various stakeholder’s whit a One Health framework.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at Preprints.org, Table S1: Bacterial isolations and their corresponding microbiological counts from each irrigation sampling point on the island of Fuerteventura; Table S2: Bacterial isolations and their corresponding microbiological counts from each irrigation sampling point on the island of Lanzarote; Table S3: Bacterial isolations and their corresponding microbiological counts from each irrigation sampling point on the island of Gran Canaria; Table S4. : Bacterial isolations and their corresponding microbiological counts from each irrigation sampling point on the island of Tenerife.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization M.M-R, M.H-P, C.H-S and A.A.; methodolgy M.M-R, M.H-P, C.H-S and A.A, A.P-G, R.P-R and FJ. D-P.; software, M.M-R; validation, M.H-P and JC.G; formal analysis, M.M-R, M.H-P, C.H-S, A.A.; investigation M.M-R, M.H-P, C.H-S, A.A. and JC. G.; resources M.H.P, C.H-S and FJ.D-P.; data curation M.M-R, M.H-P, C.H-S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M-R, M.H-P, C.H-S.; M.M-R , M.H-P, C.H-S, A.A, JC. G, A. P-G, R. P-R, FJ. D-P.; visualization, M.M-R, M.H-P, and A.A.; supervision, M.H-P, and A.A..; project administration, M.H-P, and A.A..; funding acquisition, C.H-S and FJ.D-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript

Funding

This study was funded BY CAJACANARIAS FOUNDATION AND “LA CAIXA” Foundation through the project “Recycled wastewater as a potential source of microplastics and other emerging contaminants in agricultural soils” (2022CLISA22).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their gratitude to the owners of the agricultural fields where the sampling was conducted for their collaboration and support in this research. María Martínez Ruiz, Cintia Hernández Sánchez, Miriam Hernández Sánchez and Ángeles Arias acknowledge the funding from Cátedra de Sostenibilidad y Medio Ambiente Cabildo de Tenerife.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
WHO World Health Organization
CFU colony-forming-units
MALDI-TOF MS Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry.
NFGNB non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli
KPC Carbapenemasa Klebsiella pneumoniae
MBL Metalo-β-lactamasa
OXA Oxacilinasas
WWTP Waste Water Treatment Plant

References

  1. Atay I, Saladié >Òscar. Water Scarcity and Climate Change in Mykonos (Greece): The Perceptions of the Hospitality Stakeholders. Tourism and Hospitality 2022, Vol 3, Pages 765-787 [Internet]. 2022 Sep 6 [cited 2025 Jun 29];3(3):765–87. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/3/3/47/htm.
  2. Bernabé-Crespo MB, Loáiciga H. Managing Potable Water in Southeastern Spain, Los Angeles, and Sydney: Transcontinental Approaches to Overcome Water Scarcity. Water Resources Management [Internet]. 2024 Mar 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];38(4):1299–313. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11269-023-03721-8.
  3. Schallenberg-Rodríguez J, Veza JM, Blanco-Marigorta A. Energy efficiency and desalination in the Canary Islands. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014 Dec 1;40:741–8.
  4. Cruz-Pérez N, Santamarta JC, Álvarez-Acosta C. Water footprint of representative agricultural crops on volcanic islands: the case of the Canary Islands. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems [Internet]. 2023 Aug 4 [cited 2025 Jan 17];38:e36. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems/article/water-footprint-of-representative-agricultural-crops-on-volcanic-islands-the-case-of-the-canary-islands/B80B6B6C58E185B66062D3E772B45722.
  5. Aguilera-Klink F, Pérez-Moriana E, Sánchez-García J. The social construction of scarcity. The case of water in Tenerife (Canary Islands). Ecological Economics. 2000 Aug;34(2):233–45.
  6. Dwight RH, Fernandez LM, Baker DB, Semenza JC, Olson BH. Estimating the economic burden from illnesses associated with recreational coastal water pollution - A case study in Orange County, California. J Environ Manage. 2005;76(2):95–103.
  7. Jacob J, Moilleron R, Thiebault T, Jung YJ, Aung Khant N, Kim H, et al. Impact of Climate Change on Waterborne Diseases: Directions towards Sustainability. Water 2023, Vol 15, Page 1298 [Internet]. 2023 Mar 25 [cited 2025 Sep 4];15(7):1298. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/15/7/1298/htm.
  8. Mora C, McKenzie T, Gaw IM, Dean JM, von Hammerstein H, Knudson TA, et al. Over half of known human pathogenic diseases can be aggravated by climate change. Nature Climate Change 2022 12:9 [Internet]. 2022 Aug 8 [cited 2025 Sep 4];12(9):869–75. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-022-01426-1.
  9. Seymour JR, McLellan SL. Climate change will amplify the impacts of harmful microorganisms in aquatic ecosystems. Nature Microbiology 2025 10:3 [Internet]. 2025 Feb 28 [cited 2025 Sep 4];10(3):615–26. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-025-01948-2.
  10. Ingrao C, Strippoli R, Lagioia G, Huisingh D. Water scarcity in agriculture: An overview of causes, impacts and approaches for reducing the risks. Heliyon [Internet]. 2023 Aug 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];9(8):e18507. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023057158.
  11. Levintal E, Kniffin ML, Ganot Y, Marwaha N, Murphy NP, Dahlke HE. Agricultural managed aquifer recharge (Ag-MAR)—a method for sustainable groundwater management: A review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Jun 29];53(3):291–314. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10643389.2022.2050160.
  12. Mainardis M, Cecconet D, Moretti A, Callegari A, Goi D, Freguia S, et al. Wastewater fertigation in agriculture: Issues and opportunities for improved water management and circular economy. Environmental Pollution [Internet]. 2022 Mar 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];296:118755. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S026974912102337X.
  13. Radcliffe JC. Current status of recycled water for agricultural irrigation in Australia, potential opportunities and areas of emerging concern. Science of The Total Environment [Internet]. 2022 Feb 10 [cited 2025 Jun 29];807:151676. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721067528.
  14. Cosenza A, Carnesi M, Calantoni D, Ferrante M, Mannina G. Transition to Circular Economy in the Water Sector by Legislative Perspectives for the Sicilian Region (Italy). Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Jun 29];524 LNCE:457–63. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-63353-9_77.
  15. Maffettone R, Manoli K, Drei P, Cacciatori C, Bellini R, Gawlik BM, et al. Water Reuse in the European Union: Risk Management Approach According to the Regulation (EU) 2020/741. 2024 [cited 2025 Jun 29];413–42. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-67739-7_17.
  16. Ricciardo Calderaro M, Fusco A, Caterina Amitrano C, Ricciardo Calderaro M, Fusco A, Amitrano CC. The European Union Regulation 2020/741: From the Management of Water Resources to the EU Legislation for Its Reuse. 2024 [cited 2025 Jun 29];395–412. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-67739-7_16.
  17. Shemer H, Wald S, Semiat R. Challenges and Solutions for Global Water Scarcity. Membranes 2023, Vol 13, Page 612 [Internet]. 2023 Jun 20 [cited 2025 Jun 29];13(6):612. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/13/6/612/htm.
  18. Maffettone R, Manoli K, Drei P, Cacciatori C, Bellini R, Gawlik BM, et al. Water Reuse in the European Union: Risk Management Approach According to the Regulation (EU) 2020/741. 2024 [cited 2025 Jan 17];413–42. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-67739-7_17.
  19. Hristov J, Barreiro-Hurle J, Salputra G, Blanco M, Witzke P. Reuse of treated water in European agriculture: Potential to address water scarcity under climate change. Agric Water Manag. 2021 May 31;251:106872.
  20. Mainardis M, Cecconet D, Moretti A, Callegari A, Goi D, Freguia S, et al. Wastewater fertigation in agriculture: Issues and opportunities for improved water management and circular economy. Environmental Pollution. 2022 Mar 1;296:118755.
  21. Liu X, Liu W, Tang Q, Liu B, Wada Y, Yang H. Global Agricultural Water Scarcity Assessment Incorporating Blue and Green Water Availability Under Future Climate Change. Earths Future [Internet]. 2022 Apr 1 [cited 2025 Jan 17];10(4):e2021EF002567. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021EF002567.
  22. McEwen SA, Collignon PJ. Antimicrobial Resistance: a One Health Perspective. Microbiol Spectr [Internet]. 2018 Apr 6 [cited 2025 Jun 29];6(2). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29600770/.
  23. Salam MA, Al-Amin MY, Salam MT, Pawar JS, Akhter N, Rabaan AA, et al. Antimicrobial Resistance: A Growing Serious Threat for Global Public Health. Healthcare 2023, Vol 11, Page 1946 [Internet]. 2023 Jul 5 [cited 2025 Jun 29];11(13):1946. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/13/1946/htm.
  24. Penserini L, Cantoni B, Gabrielli M, Sezenna E, Saponaro S, Antonelli M. An integrated human health risk assessment framework for alkylphenols due to drinking water and crops’ food consumption. Chemosphere [Internet]. 2023 Jun 1 [cited 2025 Aug 13];325:138259. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004565352300526X?via%3Dihub.
  25. Penserini L, Cantoni B, Antonelli M. Modelling the impacts generated by reclaimed wastewater reuse in agriculture: From literature gaps to an integrated risk assessment in a One Health perspective. J Environ Manage [Internet]. 2024 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Aug 13];371:122715. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479724027014?via%3Dihub.
  26. Wise MG, Karlowsky JA, Mohamed N, Hermsen ED, Kamat S, Townsend A, et al. Global trends in carbapenem- and difficult-to-treat-resistance among World Health Organization priority bacterial pathogens: ATLAS surveillance program 2018–2022. J Glob Antimicrob Resist [Internet]. 2024 Jun 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];37:168–75. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38608936/.
  27. Dandachi I, Chaddad A, Hanna J, Matta J, Daoud Z. Understanding the epidemiology of multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacilli in the middle east using a one health approach. Front Microbiol [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 Jun 29];10(AUG). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31507558/.
  28. Hassoun-Kheir N, Stabholz Y, Kreft JU, de la Cruz R, Romalde JL, Nesme J, et al. Comparison of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes abundance in hospital and community wastewater: A systematic review. Science of The Total Environment [Internet]. 2020 Nov 15 [cited 2025 Aug 13];743:140804. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S004896972034328X?via%3Dihub.
  29. Carattoli A. Resistance plasmid families in Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother [Internet]. 2009 Jun [cited 2025 Jun 29];53(6):2227–38. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19307361/.
  30. Carattoli A. Plasmids in Gram negatives: Molecular typing of resistance plasmids. International Journal of Medical Microbiology [Internet]. 2011 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];301(8):654–8. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1438422111000890.
  31. Carattoli A. Plasmids and the spread of resistance. International Journal of Medical Microbiology [Internet]. 2013 Aug [cited 2025 Jun 29];303(6–7):298–304. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23499304/.
  32. Lamba M, Graham DW, Ahammad SZ. Hospital Wastewater Releases of Carbapenem-Resistance Pathogens and Genes in Urban India. Environ Sci Technol [Internet]. 2017 Dec 5 [cited 2025 Jun 29];51(23):13906–12. Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.7b03380.
  33. Guo J, Li J, Chen H, Bond PL, Yuan Z. Metagenomic analysis reveals wastewater treatment plants as hotspots of antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements. Water Res [Internet]. 2017 Oct 15 [cited 2025 Sep 4];123:468–78. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135417305651.
  34. Drigo B, Brunetti G, Aleer SC, Bell JM, Short MD, Vasileiadis S, et al. Inactivation, removal, and regrowth potential of opportunistic pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes in recycled water systems. Water Res [Internet]. 2021 Aug 1 [cited 2025 Sep 4];201:117324. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135421005224.
  35. Jjemba P, Johnson W, Bukhari Z, LeChevallier M. Review of the leading challenges in maintaining reclaimed water quality during storage and distribution. Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination [Internet]. 2014 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Sep 23];4(4):209–37. Available from: http://iwaponline.com/jwrd/article-pdf/4/4/209/378145/209.pdf.
  36. Reichert G, Hilgert S, Alexander J, Rodrigues de Azevedo JC, Morck T, Fuchs S, et al. Determination of antibiotic resistance genes in a WWTP-impacted river in surface water, sediment, and biofilm: Influence of seasonality and water quality. Science of The Total Environment [Internet]. 2021 May 10 [cited 2025 Sep 23];768:144526. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969720380578?via%3Dihub.
  37. Song P, Xiao Y, Muhammad T, Li Y. Impact of key water quality factors on microbial community and biofilm formation in reclaimed water distribution systems. J Environ Chem Eng [Internet]. 2025 Oct 1 [cited 2025 Sep 23];13(5):117554. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S221334372502250X?via%3Dihub.
  38. Brienza M, Sauvêtre A, Ait-Mouheb N, Bru-Adan V, Coviello D, Lequette K, et al. Reclaimed wastewater reuse in irrigation: Role of biofilms in the fate of antibiotics and spread of antimicrobial resistance. Water Res [Internet]. 2022 Aug 1 [cited 2025 Sep 24];221:118830. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135422007795.
  39. Attrah M, Schärer MR, Esposito M, Gionchetta G, Bürgmann H, Lens PNL, et al. Disentangling abiotic and biotic effects of treated wastewater on stream biofilm resistomes enables the discovery of a new planctomycete beta-lactamase. Microbiome [Internet]. 2024 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Sep 24];12(1):1–15. Available from: https://microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40168-024-01879-w.
  40. Bhattacharyya A, Haldar A, Bhattacharyya M, Ghosh A. Anthropogenic influence shapes the distribution of antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) in the sediment of Sundarban estuary in India. Science of the Total Environment [Internet]. 2019 Jan 10 [cited 2025 Sep 10];647:1626–39. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30180366/.
  41. Plan de gestión del riesgo del agua regenerada [Internet]. [cited 2025 Sep 24]. Available from: https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/agua/temas/concesiones-y-autorizaciones/reutilizacion-aguas-depuradas/plan-de-gestion-del-riesgo-del-agua-regenerada.html.
  42. Aguilera-Klink F, Pérez-Moriana E, Sánchez-García J. The social construction of scarcity. The case of water in Tenerife (Canary Islands). Ecological Economics [Internet]. 2000 Aug 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];34(2):233–45. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921800900001609.
  43. Inicio ISTAC - Gobierno de Canarias [Internet]. [cited 2025 May 30]. Available from: https://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/istac/.
  44. Quesada-Ruiz LC, García-Romero L, Ferrer-Valero N. Mapping environmental crime to characterize human impacts on islands: an applied and methodological research in Canary Islands. J Environ Manage [Internet]. 2023 Nov 15 [cited 2025 Jun 29];346:118959. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479723017474.
  45. Cruz-Pérez N, Santamarta JC, Álvarez-Acosta C. Water footprint of representative agricultural crops on volcanic islands: the case of the Canary Islands. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems [Internet]. 2023 Aug 4 [cited 2025 Jun 29];38:e36. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems/article/water-footprint-of-representative-agricultural-crops-on-volcanic-islands-the-case-of-the-canary-islands/B80B6B6C58E185B66062D3E772B45722.
  46. Pérez-Reverón R, Grattan SR, Perdomo-González A, Pérez-Pérez JA, Díaz-Peña FJ. Marginal quality waters: Adequate resources for sustainable forage production in saline soils? Agric Water Manag [Internet]. 2024 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];305:109142. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424004785.
  47. Ashfaq MY, Da’na DA, Al-Ghouti MA. Application of MALDI-TOF MS for identification of environmental bacteria: A review. J Environ Manage [Internet]. 2022 Mar 1 [cited 2025 Aug 13];305:114359. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030147972102421X?via%3Dihub.
  48. Puljko A, Barišić I, Dekić Rozman S, Križanović S, Babić I, Jelić M, et al. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of carbapenem and colistin resistance in Klebsiella and other Enterobacterales from treated wastewater in Croatia. Environ Int [Internet]. 2024 Mar 1 [cited 2025 Aug 13];185:108554. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412024001405.
  49. Dikoumba AC, Onanga R, Jean-Pierre H, Didelot MN, Dumont Y, Ouedraogo AS, et al. Prevalence and Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria in Gabon. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene [Internet]. 2023 Feb 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];108(2):268–74. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36535247/.
  50. Lee SY, Octavia S, Chew KL. Detection of OXA-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae with chromID CARBA SMART screening plate. Pathology [Internet]. 2019 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];51(1):108–10. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30454880/.
  51. Hopkins KL, Meunier D, Mustafa N, Pike R, Woodford N. Evaluation of temocillin and meropenem MICs as diagnostic markers for OXA-48-like carbapenemases. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy [Internet]. 2019 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];74(12):3641–3. Available from. [CrossRef]
  52. Sun K, Xu X, Yan J, Zhang L. Evaluation of six phenotypic methods for the detection of carbapenemases in gram-negative bacteria with characterized resistance mechanisms. Ann Lab Med [Internet]. 2017 Jul 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];37(4):305–12. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28445009/.
  53. Hegstad K, Giske CG, Haldorsen B, Matuschek E, Schønning K, Leegaard TM, et al. Performance of the EUCAST disk diffusion method, the CLSI agar screen method, and the Vitek 2 automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing system for detection of clinical isolates of enterococci with low- and medium-level VanB-type vancomycin resistance: A multicenter study. J Clin Microbiol [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2025 Jun 29];52(5):1582–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24599985/.
  54. ISTAC. ISTAC | Efectivos de ganado según especies, categorías de animales y razas. Islas de Canarias por años | Banco de datos [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Sep 29]. Available from: https://www3.gobiernodecanarias.org/istac/statistical-visualizer/visualizer/data.html?agencyId=ISTAC&resourceId=E01008B_000019&version=1.5&resourceType=dataset&multidatasetId=ISTAC:E01008B_000001#visualization/table.
  55. Denissen J, Havenga B, Reyneke B, Khan S, Khan W. Comparing antibiotic resistance and virulence profiles of Enterococcus faecium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from environmental and clinical settings. Heliyon [Internet]. 2024 May 15 [cited 2025 Jun 29];10(9):e30215. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024062467.
  56. Liu Y, Yang K, Wang Y, Hao C, Li Y, Zhu H, et al. Intestinal bacteria aerosols from hospital and municipal wastewater treatment: Seasonal variations, dispersal characteristics and toxic effects. Environ Res [Internet]. 2025 Apr 15 [cited 2025 Jun 29];271:121058. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935125003093.
  57. Tsvetanova Z, Boshnakov R. Antimicrobial Resistance of Waste Water Microbiome in an Urban Waste Water Treatment Plant. Water (Switzerland) [Internet]. 2025 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];17(1):39. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/17/1/39/htm.
  58. Deblais L, Ahmedo BU, Ojeda A, Mummed B, Wang Y, Mekonnen YT, et al. Assessing fecal contamination from human and environmental sources using Escherichia coli as an indicator in rural eastern Ethiopian households—a cross-sectional study from the EXCAM project. Front Public Health [Internet]. 2025 Jan 6 [cited 2025 Jun 29];12:1484808. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11743629/.
  59. Stec J, Kosikowska U, Mendrycka M, Stępień-Pyśniak D, Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej P, Bębnowska D, et al. Opportunistic Pathogens of Recreational Waters with Emphasis on Antimicrobial Resistance—A Possible Subject of Human Health Concern. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2022 Jun 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];19(12). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35742550/.
  60. Regulation - 2020/741 - EN - EUR-Lex [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 13]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/741/oj/eng.
  61. Water Sanitation and Health [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/environment-climate-change-and-health/water-sanitation-and-health/sanitation-safety/guidelines-for-safe-use-of-wastewater-greywater-and-excreta.
  62. European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/about-us/networks/disease-networks-and-laboratory-networks/ears-net-data.
  63. Rice LB. Federal Funding for the Study of Antimicrobial Resistance in Nosocomial Pathogens: No ESKAPE. [cited 2025 Sep 10];1094–102. Available from: http://malaria.wellcome.ac.uk/.
  64. Montesinos I, Campos S, Ramos MJ, Ruiz-Garbajosa P, Riverol D, Batista N, et al. Estudio del primer brote por Enterococcus faecium vanA en Canarias. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin [Internet]. 2010 Aug [cited 2025 Jun 29];28(7):430–4. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20378209/.
  65. Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) [Internet]. [cited 2025 Sep 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/initiatives/glass.
  66. Beg AZ, Khan AU. Genome analyses of blaNDM-4 carrying ST 315 Escherichia coli isolate from sewage water of one of the Indian hospitals. Gut Pathog [Internet]. 2018 May 24 [cited 2025 Sep 10];10(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29849769/.
  67. Hamza D, Dorgham S, Ismael E, El-Moez SIA, Elhariri M, Elhelw R, et al. Emergence of β-lactamase- A nd carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae at integrated fish farms. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control [Internet]. 2020 May 19 [cited 2025 Sep 10];9(1):1–12. Available from: https://aricjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13756-020-00736-3.
  68. Tavares M, Kozak M, Balola A, Sá-Correia I. Burkholderia cepacia Complex Bacteria: a Feared Contamination Risk in Water-Based Pharmaceutical Products. Clin Microbiol Rev [Internet]. 2020 Jul 1 [cited 2025 Sep 10];33(3). Available from: /doi/pdf/10.1128/cmr.00139-19?download=true.
  69. Peter S, Oberhettinger P, Schuele L, Dinkelacker A, Vogel W, Dörfel D, et al. Genomic characterisation of clinical and environmental Pseudomonas putida group strains and determination of their role in the transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Genomics [Internet]. 2017 Nov 10 [cited 2025 Aug 13];18(1):859. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5681832/.
  70. Corona-Nakamura AL, Miranda-Novales MG, Leaños-Miranda B, Portillo-Gómez L, Hernández-Chávez A, Anthor-Rendón J, et al. Epidemiologic Study of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Critical Patients and Reservoirs. Arch Med Res [Internet]. 2001 May 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];32(3):238–42. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0188440901002673.
  71. Fazeli H, Akbari R, Moghim S, Esfahani B. Phenotypic characterization and PCR-Ribotypic profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cystic fibrosis patients in Iran. Adv Biomed Res. 2013;2(1):18. [CrossRef]
  72. Riera E, Cabot G, Mulet X, García-Castillo M, del Campo R, Juan C, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa carbapenem resistance mechanisms in Spain: impact on the activity of imipenem, meropenem and doripenem. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy [Internet]. 2011 Sep 1 [cited 2025 Sep 29];66(9):2022–7. Available from. [CrossRef]
  73. Ruedas-López A, Alonso-García I, Lasarte-Monterrubio C, Guijarro-Sánchez P, Gato E, Vázquez-Ucha JC, et al. Selection of AmpC β-Lactamase Variants and Metallo-β-Lactamases Leading to Ceftolozane/Tazobactam and Ceftazidime/Avibactam Resistance during Treatment of MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother [Internet]. 2022 Feb 1 [cited 2025 Sep 29];66(2). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34930034/.
  74. PÉREZ-VÁZQUEZ M, SOLA-CAMPOY PJ, ZURITA ÁM, ÁVILA A, GÓMEZ-BERTOMEU F, SOLÍS S, et al. Carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Spain: interregional dissemination of the high-risk clones ST175 and ST244 carrying blaVIM-2, blaVIM-1, blaIMP-8, blaVIM-20 and blaKPC-2. Int J Antimicrob Agents [Internet]. 2020 Jul 1 [cited 2025 Sep 29];56(1):106026. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924857920301898?via%3Dihub.
  75. Hu Y, Shen W, Lin D, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Zhou H, et al. KPC variants conferring resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Microbiol Res [Internet]. 2024 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Sep 29];289:127893. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0944501324002945?via%3Dihub.
  76. Shields RK, Chen L, Cheng S, Chavda KD, Press EG, Snyder A, et al. Emergence of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Due to Plasmid-Borne blaKPC-3 Mutations during Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother [Internet]. 2017 Mar 1 [cited 2025 Sep 29];61(3). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28031201/.
  77. Faccone D, de Mendieta JM, Albornoz E, Chavez M, Genero F, Echegorry M, et al. Emergence of KPC-31, a KPC-3 Variant Associated with Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance, in an Extensively Drug-Resistant ST235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother [Internet]. 2022 Oct 26 [cited 2025 Sep 29];66(11). Available from: /doi/pdf/10.1128/aac.00648-22?download=true.
  78. Monroy-Pérez E, Herrera-Gabriel JP, Olvera-Navarro E, Ugalde-Tecillo L, García-Cortés LR, Moreno-Noguez M, et al. Molecular Properties of Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Causing Clinically Critical Infections. Pathogens [Internet]. 2024 Oct 1 [cited 2025 Sep 10];13(10):868. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/13/10/868/htm.
  79. Pang Z, Raudonis R, Glick BR, Lin TJ, Cheng Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol Adv [Internet]. 2019 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Sep 10];37(1):177–92. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734975018301976?via%3Dihub.
  80. Estepa V, Rojo-Bezares B, Azcona-Gutiérrez JM, Olarte I, Torres C, Sáenz Y. Caracterización de mecanismos de resistencia a carbapenémicos en aislados clínicos de Pseudomonas aeruginosa en un hospital español. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin [Internet]. 2017 Mar 1 [cited 2025 Sep 10];35(3):141–7. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0213005X16000318.
  81. Castanheira M, Mendes RE, Gales AC. Global Epidemiology and Mechanisms of Resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex Clinical Infectious Diseases ® 2023;76(S2):S166-78.
  82. Lee CR, Lee JH, Park M, Park KS, Bae IK, Kim YB, et al. Biology of Acinetobacter baumannii: Pathogenesis, antibiotic resistance mechanisms, and prospective treatment options. Front Cell Infect Microbiol [Internet]. 2017 Mar 13 [cited 2025 Jun 29];7(MAR). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28348979/.
  83. Woodford N, Wareham DW, Guerra B, Teale C. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and non-Enterobacteriaceae from animals and the environment: an emerging public health risk of our own making? Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy [Internet]. 2014 Feb 1 [cited 2025 Jun 29];69(2):287–91. Available from. [CrossRef]
  84. Nguyen M, Joshi SG. Carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii, and their importance in hospital-acquired infections: a scientific review. J Appl Microbiol [Internet]. 2021 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Sep 10];131(6):2715–38. Available from. [CrossRef]
  85. Pfeifer Y, Wilharm G, Zander E, Wichelhaus TA, Göttig SG, Hunfeld KP, et al. Molecular characterization of blaNDM-1 in an Acinetobacter baumannii strain isolated in Germany in 2007. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy [Internet]. 2011 Sep 1 [cited 2025 Sep 10];66(9):1998–2001. Available from. [CrossRef]
  86. Rodríguez CH, Nastro M, Famiglietti A. Carbapenemases in Acinetobacter baumannii. Review of their dissemination in Latin America. Rev Argent Microbiol [Internet]. 2018 Jul 1 [cited 2025 Sep 29];50(3):327–33. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29548732/.
  87. Li J, Li Y, Cao X, Zheng J, Zhang Y, Xie H, et al. Genome-wide identification and oxacillinase OXA distribution characteristics of Acinetobacter spp. based on a global database. Front Microbiol [Internet]. 2023 Jun 1 [cited 2025 Sep 29];14:1174200. Available from: https://www.
  88. Kurihara MNL, Sales RO de, Silva KE da, Maciel WG, Simionatto S. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii outbreaks: a global problem in healthcare settings. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Sep 29];53:e20200248. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33174956/.
  89. WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed.
  90. Cantet F, Hervio-Heath D, Caro A, Le Mennec C, Monteil C, Quéméré C, et al. Quantification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio cholerae in French Mediterranean coastal lagoons. Res Microbiol [Internet]. 2013 Oct [cited 2025 Jun 29];164(8):867–74. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23770313/.
  91. IGERE BE, ONOHUEAN H, Adomi PO, Bashiru A. Phenicol antibiotic resistance status amongst environmental non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae and Clinical O1/O139 Vibrio cholerae strains: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. The Microbe [Internet]. 2025 Sep 1 [cited 2025 Sep 24];8:100474. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950194625002420?via%3Dihub.
  92. Maraki S, Christidou A, Anastasaki M, Scoulica E. Non-O1, non-O139 Vibrio cholerae bacteremic skin and soft tissue infections. Infect Dis (Lond) [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2025 Sep 24];48(3):171–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26503346/.
  93. Rodríguez JY, Duarte C, Rodríguez GJ, Montaño LA, Benítez-Peñuela MA, Díaz P, et al. Bacteremia by non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae: Case description and literature review. Biomedica [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Sep 24];43(3):323–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37871571/.
  94. Al-Jassim N, Ansari MI, Harb M, Hong PY. Removal of bacterial contaminants and antibiotic resistance genes by conventional wastewater treatment processes in Saudi Arabia: Is the treated wastewater safe to reuse for agricultural irrigation? Water Res [Internet]. 2015 Apr 15 [cited 2025 Sep 10];73:277–90. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135415000640?via%3Dihub.
  95. Pessoa RBG, Oliveira WF de, Correia MT dos S, Fontes A, Coelho LCBB. Aeromonas and Human Health Disorders: Clinical Approaches. Front Microbiol [Internet]. 2022 May 31 [cited 2025 Sep 10];13:868890. Available from: www.frontiersin.org.
  96. Fernández-Bravo A, Figueras MJ. An Update on the Genus Aeromonas: Taxonomy, Epidemiology, and Pathogenicity. Microorganisms 2020, Vol 8, Page 129 [Internet]. 2020 Jan 17 [cited 2025 Sep 10];8(1):129. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/1/129/htm.
  97. Dias C, Borges A, Saavedra MJ, Simões M. Biofilm formation and multidrug-resistant Aeromonas spp. from wild animals. J Glob Antimicrob Resist [Internet]. 2018 Mar 1 [cited 2025 Sep 10];12:227–34. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2213716517301765?via%3Dihub.
Table 1. Counts of the most relevant non-fermenting Gram-negative (NFGN) species isolated at each sampling point.
Table 1. Counts of the most relevant non-fermenting Gram-negative (NFGN) species isolated at each sampling point.
Irrigation sampling point Microorganism CFU/100mL
B5 Pseudomona aeruginosa 4,1 x104
B7 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1,5x104
B8 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 2,9x102
B8 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 6,7x100
B18 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1,6x105
B20 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1,6x102
B11 Acinetobacter baumannii 1,2x106
B15 Acinetobacter baumannii 6,0x104
B19 Acinetobacter baumannii 7,3x104
B11 Acinetobacter pittii 1,9x105
B12 Acinetobacter pittii 4,6x107
B13 Acinetobacter pittii 6,5x106
Table 2. Counts of the most relevant Enterobacteriaceae species isolated at each sampling point.
Table 2. Counts of the most relevant Enterobacteriaceae species isolated at each sampling point.
Irrigation sampling point Microorganism CFU/100mL
B8 Klebsiella pneumoniae 6,7x100
B10 Klebsiella pneumoniae 3x101
B11 Klebsiella pneumoniae 1,5x105
B12 Klebsiella pneumoniae 4,1x107
B17 Klebsiella pneumoniae 5x100
B18 Klebsiella pneumoniae 6x102
B19 Klebsiella pneumoniae 1,8x105
B7 Escherichia coli 1,3x100
B9 Escherichia coli 3,3x100
B10 Escherichia coli 5x101
B11 Escherichia hermannii 5,7x106
B12 Escherichia hermanii 8,8x106
B13 Escherichia hermanii 1,3x106
B14 Escherichia hermanii 6,0x107
B15 Escherichia hermannii 8,3x105
B13 Enterobacter cloacae 3,0x106
B14 Enterobacter cloacae 6,0x107
Table 3. Counts of the most relevant gram-positive bacteria species isolated at each sampling point.
Table 3. Counts of the most relevant gram-positive bacteria species isolated at each sampling point.
Irrigation sampling point Microorganism CFU/100mL
B11 Enterococcus faecium 9,3x100
B1 Enterococcus faecalis 5,2x101
B2 Enterococcus faecalis 3x103
B3 Enterococcus faecalis 3x103
B5 Enterococcus faecalis 7,7x102
B11 Enterococcus faecalis 1,3x102
B14 Enterococcus faecalis 2,8x103
B18 Enterococcus faecalis 7,3x101
B19 Enterococcus faecalis 2,4x104
B20 Enterococcus faecalis 2,3x102
Table 4. Multidrug-resistant microorganisms and the resistance mechanisms detected in samples from each sampling point.
Table 4. Multidrug-resistant microorganisms and the resistance mechanisms detected in samples from each sampling point.
Island Irrigation sampling point Microorganism Resistant mechanism Number of isolates
Fuerteventura B1 Aeromonas punctata Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 2
Fuerteventura B1 Pseudomonas mendocina Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Fuerteventura B2 Burkholderia multivorans Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Lanzarote B6 Aeromonas sobria Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Lanzarote B8 Pseudomonas aeruginosa MBL 1
Lanzarote B8 Pseudomonas aeruginosa KPC 1
Lanzarote B8 Klebsiella pneumoniae ESBL + Loss of porin 1
Lanzarote B8 Burkholderia cepacia Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Lanzarote B9 Pseudomonas putida Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Lanzarote B9 Aeromonas salmonicida Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Lanzarote B10 Pseudomonas stutzeri Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Lanzarote B10 Pseudomonas fluorescens Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Gran Canaria B11 Acinetobacter pittii Oxacilinasa 2
Gran Canaria B11 Klebsiella pneumoniae OXA-48 1
Gran Canaria B11 Acinetobacter baumanii Oxacilinasa 1
Gran Canaria B11 Acinetobacter calcoacetius MBL 1
Gran Canaria B11 Aeromonas salmonicida Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Gran Canaria B12 Acinetobacter pittii Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Gran Canaria B12 Klebsiella pneumoniae Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Gran Canaria B12 Acinetobacter lwoffii Oxacilinasa 1
Gran Canaria B14 Escherichia hermanii OXA48 + ESBL 2
Gran Canaria B14 Enterobacter cloacae AmpC+ loss of porin 1
Gran Canaria B14 Sphingomonas paucimobilis Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Gran Canaria B14 Enterobacter cloacae KPC 2
Gran Canaria B15 Escherichia hermannii ESBL+loss of porin 2
Gran Canaria B15 Acinetobacter baumanii Oxacilinasa 1
Gran Canaria B15 Acinetobacter calcoacetius MBL 1
Tenerife B16 Pseudomonas putida Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Tenerife B18 Pseudomonas aeruginosa KPC 1
Tenerife B18 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Tenerife B19 Klebsiella pneumoniae Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Tenerife B19 Acinetobacter baumanii Oxacilinasa 1
Tenerife B19 Aeromonas hydrophila Intrinsic/other resistance mechanism 1
Tenerife B20 Pseudomonas aeruginosa MBL 1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated