1. Introduction
The nature of consciousness remains one of science's most profound mysteries. While traditional neuroscience has focused on synaptic transmission and neural computation as the primary substrates of consciousness, emerging evidence suggests that electromagnetic fields generated by neural activity may play a more fundamental role than previously recognized (Hunt & Schooler, 2019; McFadden, 2020; Pockett, 2000). The General Resonance Theory proposes that consciousness emerges from resonant electromagnetic field interactions, with shared resonance allowing micro-conscious entities to combine into macro-conscious wholes through phase transitions that dramatically increase information processing capacity (Hunt & Schooler, 2019; Hunt, 2020).
Recent advances in understanding electromagnetic field dynamics in the brain have revealed remarkable computational advantages that challenge conventional assumptions about neural processing. Electromagnetic fields demonstrate 10,000-fold greater parallelism than synaptic transmission, enabling simultaneous information processing across vast neural populations (Ruffini et al., 2020). The propagation velocity of electromagnetic waves through myelinated tissue reaches 47,000 meters per second, providing 40,000-fold reduced latency compared to the 120 meters per second typical of action potential propagation (Nunez & Srinivasan, 2006). This extraordinary speed differential enables near-instantaneous integration of information across distributed brain regions, potentially solving what has been termed the "cortical speed trap"—the challenge of integrating distributed neural activity within the narrow temporal windows required for unified conscious experience (Hunt & Jones, 2023).
Furthermore, electromagnetic field dynamics offer 100,000-fold finer temporal resolution than synaptic processes, allowing for precise temporal coding at microsecond scales that synaptic mechanisms cannot achieve (Freeman, 2000). Perhaps most surprisingly, field-based computation demonstrates approximately 1,000-fold greater energy efficiency than traditional spike-based neural coding, suggesting that evolution may have favored field dynamics for their metabolic advantages as well as their computational power (Attwell & Laughlin, 2001; Harris et al., 2012; Sterling & Laughlin, 2015; Magistretti & Allaman, 2015). These findings collectively suggest that electromagnetic fields may serve as the primary computational substrate for consciousness, with neural firing providing energetic input to sustain field computation rather than encoding information directly through spike patterns (Hunt & Jones, 2023).
Psychedelic substances offer a unique window into consciousness by profoundly altering subjective experience in reliable and measurable ways. The phenomenology of psychedelic experiences has been extensively documented, encompassing feelings of expanded awareness, ego dissolution, enhanced creativity, mystical-type experiences characterized by unity and transcendence, and what users often describe as encounters with ultimate reality or consciousness itself (Griffiths et al., 2016; Carhart-Harris & Friston, 2019). As William James noted in his seminal work on religious experiences, these states appear "noetic"—imbued with a sense of encountering fundamental truth (James, 1902). Timothy Leary and Richard Alpert (later Ram Dass) expanded on James's insights, proposing that psychedelics reveal normally hidden dimensions of consciousness (Leary et al., 1964).
This paper examines psychedelic effects through the lens of the Electromagnetic Field Framework, analyzing neurophysiological data from multiple scales of field recording to understand how these substances modulate consciousness. We focus on four paradigmatic substances that span the pharmacological and phenomenological spectrum of psychedelic experience: LSD (lysergic acid diethylamide), the prototypical psychedelic with its sustained twelve-hour journey through consciousness space; psilocybin, the gentler tryptamine that has shown remarkable therapeutic promise (Carhart-Harris et al., 2017; Palhano-Fontes et al., 2019); ketamine, the dissociative anesthetic that fragments rather than expands conscious experience (Schartner et al., 2017); and 5-MeO-DMT, the brief but overwhelmingly powerful molecule that users describe as encountering the source of consciousness itself (Timmermann et al., 2018).
The General Resonance Theory framework provides three core conjectures that position consciousness as inherently field-based (Hunt & Schooler, 2019). The Shared Resonance Conjecture proposes that shared resonance leads to the combination of micro-conscious entities into macro-conscious entities, with oscillating structures undergoing phase transitions when sufficient synchronization is achieved. The Boundary Conjecture defines the spatial and temporal boundaries of any conscious entity through the equation x = v/f, where boundary extent equals propagation velocity divided by frequency. The Nested Consciousness Conjecture suggests that lower levels of consciousness are preserved when combined into higher levels—"the many become one and are increased by one"—enabled by the hundredfold improvement in interconnectivity that fields provide over synaptic connections (Hunt, 2020).
We propose that psychedelic substances act primarily as electromagnetic field resonance modulators, tuning the brain's electromagnetic field dynamics in specific ways that expand, fragment, or reorganize consciousness. This perspective aligns with recent theoretical developments suggesting that psychedelics increase "epistemic depth"—the brain's confidence in its model of reality—leading to feelings of expanded awareness and noetic insight (Laukkonen et al., 2025). Rather than simply disrupting normal brain function, psychedelics may reveal the fundamental field-based nature of consciousness by temporarily altering its electromagnetic parameters.
2. Background: Electromagnetic Field Dynamics in Consciousness
2.1. Types of Brain Electromagnetic Recording
Understanding psychedelic effects on consciousness requires examining electromagnetic field dynamics across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Each recording methodology provides unique insights into how these substances modulate the electromagnetic substrate of experience.
Electroencephalography (EEG) measures scalp potentials generated by synchronized activity of millions of cortical pyramidal neurons, primarily capturing field oscillations from 0.5 to 100 Hz (Cohen, 2017). While EEG's spatial resolution is limited by volume conduction through skull and tissue, it provides excellent temporal resolution for tracking rapid changes in global field states. EEG primarily reflects dipoles oriented perpendicular to the cortical surface, making it particularly sensitive to activity in gyral crowns while missing signals from deep sulcal walls (Nunez & Srinivasan, 2006).
Electrocorticography (ECoG) places electrodes directly on the cortical surface, eliminating distortion from intervening tissue and providing superior spatial resolution (approximately 1 cm) while maintaining millisecond temporal precision (Buzsáki et al., 2012). ECoG captures a broader frequency range than scalp EEG, revealing high-gamma activity up to 200 Hz that correlates with local neural firing and conscious perception (Crone et al., 2006). This technique bridges the gap between large-scale field dynamics visible in EEG and local circuit activity measured by microelectrodes.
Local Field Potentials (LFPs) record extracellular voltage fluctuations from small neural populations, typically within a radius of 100 to 500 micrometers from the electrode tip (Kajikawa & Schroeder, 2011). LFPs primarily reflect synaptic currents rather than action potentials, making them ideal for studying how psychedelics alter the electromagnetic fields generated by dendritic integration and synaptic processing (Einevoll et al., 2013). The relationship between LFPs and consciousness is particularly evident in studies showing that LFP coherence, but not spike coherence, predicts perceptual binding and conscious awareness (Engel et al., 2001).
2.2. Electromagnetic Fields as the Substrate of Consciousness
The General Resonance Theory posits that electromagnetic fields generated by neural activity are not mere epiphenomena but constitute the physical substrate of consciousness itself (Hunt & Schooler, 2019). This view gains support from multiple lines of evidence. Field effects propagate essentially instantaneously compared to synaptic transmission, enabling the temporal binding necessary for unified conscious experience (McFadden, 2020). Ephaptic coupling—the direct influence of fields on neural excitability—has been demonstrated to coordinate neural activity across cortical layers and regions without synaptic connections (Anastassiou et al., 2011). Phase synchronization of field oscillations correlates more strongly with conscious perception than neural firing rates (Varela et al., 2001).
Recent discoveries have revealed that endogenous brain fields are strong enough to influence neural computation. Fields as weak as 1 V/m can entrain neural firing, well below the 10 to 100 V/m fields naturally generated in the brain (Ozen et al., 2010). Layer V pyramidal neurons, with their extensive dendritic trees spanning all cortical layers, are particularly effective at both generating and responding to electromagnetic fields (Lee et al., 2024). These neurons' unique morphology creates powerful dipoles that broadcast electromagnetic waves throughout the cortex, potentially serving as the brain's primary electromagnetic communication system.
2.3. Field Frequencies and Consciousness States
Different frequency bands of electromagnetic oscillation correlate with distinct aspects of conscious experience. Delta waves at 0.5 to 4 Hz dominate during deep sleep and may reflect the global down-states that temporarily suspend consciousness (Steriade, 1997). Theta oscillations at 4 to 8 Hz coordinate memory encoding and retrieval, creating temporal windows for integrating distributed information (Buzsáki, 2002). Alpha oscillations at 8 to 12 Hz gate attention and consciousness, serving as inhibitory barriers that segment information flow (Klimesch, 2018). Beta frequencies at 13 to 30 Hz facilitate cortical integration across regions (Bastos et al., 2018), while gamma oscillations at 30 to 100 Hz accomplish local feature binding within cortical columns (Belluscio et al., 2012).
The interaction between these frequency bands through phase-amplitude coupling creates a temporal hierarchy that structures conscious experience. Theta-gamma coupling in the hippocampus appears essential for memory encoding and retrieval, with individual gamma cycles nested within theta waves representing distinct memory items (Lisman & Jensen, 2013; Heusser et al., 2016). Alpha-beta coupling in cortical networks regulates attention and executive control (Siebenhühner et al., 2020), while delta-theta coupling during sleep facilitates memory consolidation and synaptic homeostasis (Tononi & Cirelli, 2014). These cross-frequency interactions suggest that consciousness requires not just activity at multiple frequencies but specific phase relationships between them (Bagur & Benchenane, 2018).
3. LSD: Sustained Field Coherence Enhancement
3.1. Phenomenology and Duration
LSD produces profound alterations in perception, emotion, and cognition that unfold over an extraordinary twelve-hour journey through consciousness space. Users consistently report enhanced sensory experience with colors appearing more vivid, sounds gaining dimensional depth, and textures becoming fascinatingly complex (Carhart-Harris et al., 2016). Synesthesia emerges spontaneously, with sounds triggering visual experiences and colors evoking tastes or emotions (Preller et al., 2018). The boundaries of the self progressively dissolve, leading to experiences of unity with others, nature, and ultimately the universe itself (Tagliazucchi et al., 2014). These effects emerge from LSD's remarkably high affinity for serotonin receptors, particularly 5-HT2A, though the molecule also acts on dopamine and adrenergic receptors with a promiscuity that contributes to its complex phenomenology (Nichols, 2016).
Perhaps the most striking pharmacological feature of LSD is its extraordinary potency—active doses range from 20 to 200 micrograms, making it roughly 100 to 1000 times more potent than psilocybin (2-30 milligrams) and 10,000 times more potent than mescaline (200-500 milligrams) (Nichols, 2016; Passie et al., 2008; Hofmann, 1980). This anomalous potency becomes even more remarkable when considering the energetic effects users consistently report: sustained increases in physical and mental energy lasting 8-12 hours, often accompanied by reduced need for food or sleep, and an almost manic productivity that can persist throughout the experience (Hofmann, 1980).
From an electromagnetic field perspective, this paradox resolves when we consider how LSD reconfigures the brain's energetic economy. Rather than adding energy to the system, LSD appears to dramatically increase the efficiency of existing energy utilization by shifting neural communication from metabolically expensive spike-based signaling to efficient field-based computation. When LSD binds to 5-HT2A receptors on layer V pyramidal neurons—the cortex's primary electromagnetic broadcasters—it triggers a cascade of cellular events that enhance these neurons' dipole moments and field generation (Preller et al., 2018). The electromagnetic fields generated by these activated pyramidals then influence neighboring neurons through ephaptic coupling, recruiting them into coherent oscillations without requiring additional synaptic transmission—a form of "electromagnetic contagion" that spreads activation while paradoxically reducing overall metabolic demand (Anastassiou et al., 2011). This creates a positive feedback loop: enhanced field coherence reduces the energy needed for inter-neuronal communication, freeing metabolic resources that can be redirected to sustain the enhanced field states themselves. The system essentially reorganizes from inefficient spike-based information transfer to efficient field-based computation (requiring 1000-fold less energy per bit of information), with the saved metabolic resources supporting the subjective experience of boundless energy (Attwell & Laughlin, 2001; Ruffini et al., 2020). Moreover, LSD's unique conformational binding to 5-HT2A—involving a "lid" formed by extracellular loop 2 that traps the molecule in the receptor—creates an unusually stable receptor-ligand complex with a residence time of hours rather than minutes, ensuring that this energetic cascade persists long after free LSD has cleared from synaptic spaces (Wacker et al., 2017).
The result is a self-organizing electromagnetic dynamo: LSD doesn't directly fuel consciousness but rather reconfigures the brain's electromagnetic architecture to run on far more efficient field dynamics rather than spikes, like switching a combustion engine to run on electromagnetic induction—same energy input, radically enhanced output through superior efficiency of the field-based computational substrate.
Furthermore, LSD's activation of dopaminergic systems, particularly D2 receptors, likely contributes to the subjective sense of energy by enhancing motivation and reward processing circuits (Passie et al., 2008). The sustained duration of effects, far exceeding LSD's plasma half-life of 3-4 hours, suggests that the initial molecular trigger establishes self-perpetuating field resonances that maintain altered consciousness through electromagnetic rather than continued pharmacological mechanisms. This explains how vanishingly small amounts of LSD can orchestrate profound and sustained alterations in consciousness—not by adding energy to the system, but by reconfiguring how the brain's existing energy is channeled through electromagnetic field dynamics, creating a more coherent and efficient substrate for conscious experience.
This electromagnetic system "overdrive," however, exacts a severe metabolic toll that explains both evolution's avoidance of such states (LSD has no natural analogues) and the necessity of extended recovery periods after strong psychedelic experiences. While field-based computation is more efficient per bit of information processed, the sheer volume of information integrated during psychedelic states—with 40% expanded spatial boundaries and continuous broadband enhancement—can actually increase total energy consumption, depleting glucose reserves and neurotransmitter precursors at unsustainable rates (Vollenweider & Kometer, 2010). The enhanced calcium signaling that drives field generation risks excitotoxicity if sustained, as NMDA receptors remain open longer, mitochondria become calcium-overloaded, and oxidative stress accumulates from the increased metabolic throughput (Nichols, 2016). Users often report profound exhaustion lasting days after strong LSD experiences—not mere psychological fatigue but deep metabolic depletion reflecting the energetic debt incurred by hours of running the brain's electromagnetic infrastructure at theoretical maximum capacity.
3.2. The LSD EEG Resonome
The most consistent EEG finding under LSD involves suppression of posterior alpha power in the 8 to 12 Hz range (Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2013; Carhart-Harris et al., 2016). In the General Resonance Theory framework, alpha oscillations serve as inhibitory gates that segment and filter information flow between brain regions (Hunt & Schooler, 2019). Their suppression removes these electromagnetic boundaries, allowing increased information integration across normally separated processing streams. This disinhibition may underlie the sensory enhancement and synesthesia characteristic of LSD experience, as visual, auditory, and other sensory streams lose their normal electromagnetic segregation (Preller et al., 2019).
Concurrent with alpha suppression, LSD produces marked enhancement of gamma power in the 30 to 100 Hz range, particularly prominent in visual and association cortices (Schartner et al., 2017). This increased gamma activity reflects enhanced local field computation and feature binding, potentially explaining the rich detail and complex patterns perceived during LSD experiences. The sustained nature of this gamma enhancement—persisting for hours rather than the brief bursts seen in normal cognition—suggests that LSD stabilizes field resonance at these higher frequencies, maintaining a state of heightened local processing that would normally be metabolically unsustainable (Pallavicini et al., 2019).
Enhanced theta-gamma coupling emerges in both hippocampal and cortical regions under LSD influence (Preller et al., 2018). This strengthened cross-frequency coupling creates nested oscillatory structures where multiple streams of consciousness appear to coexist simultaneously. Users often report experiencing multiple perspectives or layers of meaning simultaneously, a phenomenon that may directly reflect this enhanced nesting of faster oscillations within slower carrier waves (Tagliazucchi et al., 2014). The preservation of theta rhythm structure while gamma activity increases suggests that LSD expands the information capacity of each theta cycle rather than disrupting the fundamental temporal organization of consciousness (Schomburg et al., 2014).
3.3. ECoG and LFP Insights
Direct cortical recordings through ECoG reveal field dynamics invisible from the scalp that illuminate LSD's mechanisms. Rather than enhancement of specific frequency bands, LSD increases broadband power across the entire measured spectrum (Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2013). This broadband enhancement suggests continuous field computation rather than discrete oscillatory processes, supporting the GRT view that consciousness emerges from field dynamics across all frequencies rather than from specific neural oscillations (Hunt & Jones, 2023). The increase in broadband power may reflect a general amplification of the electromagnetic substrate of consciousness itself.
LSD markedly increases ephaptic coupling between cortical layers, as evidenced by stronger correlations between local field potentials recorded at different cortical depths (Lee et al., 2024). Layer V pyramidal neurons, which generate the strongest electromagnetic dipoles in the cortex due to their large apical dendrites extending to the cortical surface, show particularly enhanced field coupling under LSD (Anastassiou et al., 2011). This layer-specific enhancement is significant because Layer V pyramidals project to subcortical structures and other cortical areas, suggesting that LSD amplifies the brain's primary electromagnetic broadcast system.
The spatial spread of coherent field activity expands dramatically under LSD, with correlation lengths between recording sites increasing by approximately forty percent (Tagliazucchi et al., 2014). This expanded spatial integration may underlie the subjective sense of boundary dissolution and unity experiences that define psychedelic states. When electromagnetic fields that normally operate independently begin to resonate together, the separate processing streams they represent may merge into unified conscious experience, dissolving the boundaries between self and other, internal and external (Carhart-Harris & Friston, 2019).
3.4. GRT Interpretation
Through the General Resonance Theory lens, LSD's effects reveal fundamental principles about consciousness (Hunt & Schooler, 2019). The expanded spatial boundaries observed can be understood through the boundary equation x = v/f. By reducing frequency through alpha suppression while maintaining propagation velocity, LSD increases the spatial extent of conscious integration. Enhanced micro-macro integration occurs as increased gamma power coupled with preserved theta rhythms allows more micro-conscious elements to integrate into macro-conscious experience while maintaining temporal structure. The extraordinary speed of field propagation—47,000 meters per second in myelinated tissue versus 120 meters per second for synaptic transmission—enables near-instantaneous integration across distributed brain regions when LSD enhances field coherence (Ruffini et al., 2020).
4. Psilocybin: Dynamic Field Flexibility
4.1. Phenomenology and Timeline
Psilocybin, the prodrug of psilocin found in numerous species of psychoactive mushrooms, produces effects lasting four to six hours that often unfold in waves of varying intensity (Griffiths et al., 2016). The experience frequently includes emotional breakthroughs where suppressed feelings surface with remarkable clarity, visual distortions that transform ordinary objects into flowing, breathing entities, and mystical-type experiences characterized by unity, transcendence, and ineffability (Roseman et al., 2018). Unlike LSD's sustained intensity that maintains fairly consistent effects throughout its duration, psilocybin experiences oscillate between peaks and valleys, with users reporting waves of effects that ebb and flow like tides of consciousness (Doss et al., 2021).
4.2. Frequency-Specific Field Changes
Psilocybin produces distinctive alterations in the brain's electromagnetic field architecture that differ markedly from those induced by LSD. Delta power in the 1 to 4 Hz range decreases significantly, particularly during peak effects (Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2013). This reduction in slow-wave activity may reflect decreased global synchronization and increased network flexibility, allowing for more dynamic transitions between conscious states. The suppression of delta waves correlates with reports of heightened awareness and reduced mental inertia.
Theta oscillations show complex modulation under psilocybin's influence. Rather than simple enhancement or suppression, theta rhythms become more variable in frequency and amplitude, suggesting increased flexibility in memory and emotional processing systems (Kometer et al., 2015). This theta variability may enable the emotional breakthroughs commonly reported, as rigid patterns of theta-mediated memory retrieval become more fluid and accessible to conscious modification.
Alpha suppression occurs similarly to LSD but with important differences in topography and timing (Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2013). While LSD produces sustained, widespread alpha suppression, psilocybin's effects on alpha are more regionally specific and temporally variable. Posterior alpha decreases most prominently during visual hallucinations, while frontal alpha may actually increase during introspective phases, creating a dynamic interplay between external perception and internal awareness (Kometer et al., 2013).
Gamma oscillations under psilocybin show increased variability rather than simple enhancement (Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2013). Moment-to-moment fluctuations in gamma power become more pronounced, with rapid transitions between high and low gamma states. This gamma flexibility may underlie the perceptual fluidity characteristic of psilocybin experiences, where visual forms morph and transform continuously rather than stabilizing into fixed patterns.
4.3. Distinctive Field Patterns
Psilocybin produces oscillatory flexibility that creates a more fluid and adaptive conscious state compared to LSD's sustained enhancement (Carhart-Harris et al., 2014). Neural oscillations become less stable, with increased transitions between different frequency patterns. This manifests as greater variance in phase-locking values between brain regions, suggesting that neural networks can more easily reconfigure their connectivity patterns. The result is enhanced cognitive flexibility that may underlie psilocybin's therapeutic effects in breaking rigid thought patterns associated with depression and anxiety (Carhart-Harris et al., 2017).
Network dynamics under psilocybin reveal increased entropy in functional connectivity patterns (Tagliazucchi et al., 2014). Rather than simply increasing or decreasing connectivity, psilocybin makes the brain's networks more dynamic, with connections forming and dissolving more readily. This network flexibility allows access to novel states of consciousness that may be therapeutically beneficial. The increased entropy suggests that psilocybin expands the repertoire of possible brain states, allowing escape from the restricted patterns that characterize psychiatric disorders (Carhart-Harris & Friston, 2019).
Cross-frequency coupling patterns under psilocybin show distinctive features that differentiate it from other psychedelics. While theta-gamma coupling remains important, psilocybin uniquely enhances delta-alpha and theta-beta coupling (Pallavicini et al., 2019). These additional coupling modes may contribute to the emotional depth of psilocybin experiences, as slower rhythms associated with emotional processing become more strongly linked to faster frequencies involved in conscious awareness and cognitive control.
4.4. Therapeutic Implications
The distinctive field dynamics induced by psilocybin have important implications for its therapeutic applications. The oscillatory flexibility and increased network entropy may explain why psilocybin shows particular promise for treating depression, where rigid, recursive thought patterns maintain negative mood states (Carhart-Harris et al., 2017). By temporarily increasing electromagnetic field flexibility, psilocybin may allow the brain to escape from maladaptive attractor states that have become pathologically stable.
The wave-like nature of psilocybin's effects, with alternating periods of intensity and integration, may be therapeutically advantageous (Watts et al., 2017). These oscillations between expanded and contracted states allow for both breakthrough experiences and periods of integration, potentially facilitating the processing and consolidation of therapeutic insights. The field dynamics during these different phases—with varying patterns of coherence and entropy—may serve distinct therapeutic functions.
5. Ketamine: Field Fragmentation Through Dissociation
5.1. Phenomenology of Dissociation
Ketamine produces a unique constellation of effects characterized by dissociation—a profound sense of disconnection from body, self, and environment (Vlisides et al., 2018). At sub-anesthetic doses used therapeutically and recreationally, users report feeling detached from their physical form, observing their thoughts and emotions from an outside perspective, and experiencing reality as dreamlike or unreal. This dissociative state differs fundamentally from the expanded unity consciousness of serotonergic psychedelics (Ballard & Zarate, 2020). Where LSD and psilocybin typically enhance sensory experience and emotional connection, ketamine creates a sense of separation and detachment.
The famous "K-hole" at higher doses represents complete dissociation from ordinary consciousness, with users reporting out-of-body experiences, encounters with alternate dimensions, and complete loss of self-identity (Vlisides et al., 2018). These experiences occur alongside profound alterations in time perception, with minutes feeling like hours or entire experiences seeming to occur outside normal temporal flow. The therapeutic potential of ketamine for depression may partly derive from this ability to temporarily disconnect from entrenched patterns of negative self-referential thinking (Zacharias et al., 2020).
5.2. NMDA Blockade and Field Effects
Ketamine's primary mechanism involves blocking NMDA receptors, which normally mediate slow excitatory neurotransmission crucial for synaptic plasticity and conscious experience (Zorumski et al., 2016). This blockade produces paradoxical effects on neural activity: while blocking an excitatory receptor might be expected to decrease brain activity, ketamine actually increases firing rates and field power in many brain regions. This paradox resolves through ketamine's differential effects on interneurons versus pyramidal cells (Homayoun & Moghaddam, 2007).
NMDA receptors on GABAergic interneurons appear more sensitive to ketamine than those on pyramidal neurons (McNally et al., 2011). When ketamine preferentially blocks interneuron NMDA receptors, it reduces inhibitory control over pyramidal cells, leading to disinhibited excitation. This creates a state of fragmented hyperactivity where local circuits become overactive but fail to coordinate into coherent global patterns—explaining the simultaneous presence of increased local field power and decreased large-scale coherence (Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2015).
The electromagnetic signature of ketamine involves dramatic alterations in gamma oscillations (Shaw et al., 2015). Rather than the sustained gamma enhancement seen with psychedelics, ketamine produces aberrant gamma bursts—brief, high-amplitude gamma events that fail to synchronize across regions. These fragmented gamma oscillations may reflect the breakdown of feature binding and perceptual integration that characterizes the ketamine experience. Local field potentials show increased power but decreased phase-locking, suggesting that individual cortical areas generate strong electromagnetic fields that fail to resonate together (Lee et al., 2013).
5.3. Distinctive Field Fragmentation
Ketamine's electromagnetic effects reveal a fundamental principle: consciousness requires not just field activity but field coherence (Hunt & Schooler, 2019). The drug produces what might be termed "electromagnetic isolation" of brain regions. Coherence analysis shows decreased synchronization between frontal and parietal regions crucial for maintaining integrated conscious experience (Lee et al., 2013). This frontoparietal disconnection correlates strongly with subjective reports of dissociation, suggesting that electromagnetic decoupling directly underlies the fragmentation of consciousness.
Layer-specific effects provide insight into ketamine's unique field dynamics. While serotonergic psychedelics primarily affect layer V pyramidal neurons that broadcast electromagnetic signals, ketamine disrupts layer II/III circuits responsible for lateral cortical integration (Scheidegger et al., 2016). This creates a situation where strong electromagnetic fields are still generated (by disinhibited layer V pyramidals) but fail to coordinate horizontally across the cortex. The result is islands of electromagnetic activity that cannot merge into unified conscious experience.
The temporal dynamics of ketamine's field effects differ markedly from those of other psychedelics. Rather than sustained alterations lasting hours, ketamine produces rapid onset (within minutes) and relatively quick recovery (within an hour) of normal field patterns (Vlisides et al., 2018). This temporal profile suggests that ketamine's effects depend on continued receptor blockade rather than triggering self-sustaining changes in field dynamics. Once NMDA receptors are unblocked, normal field coherence rapidly reconstitutes.
5.4. Implications for Understanding Consciousness
Ketamine's ability to fragment consciousness while preserving or even enhancing local neural activity provides crucial evidence for field theories of consciousness. The dissociation between local field power and global field coherence demonstrates that consciousness depends not on the strength of electromagnetic fields but on their integration (Mashour, 2013). This supports the General Resonance Theory's emphasis on shared resonance as the mechanism by which separate micro-conscious entities combine into unified macro-conscious experience (Hunt & Schooler, 2019).
The therapeutic efficacy of ketamine for treatment-resistant depression, despite producing such different subjective effects from serotonergic psychedelics, suggests multiple electromagnetic routes to therapeutic benefit (Ballard & Zarate, 2020). While psilocybin increases field flexibility and LSD enhances field coherence, ketamine's temporary field fragmentation may allow escape from pathologically stable electromagnetic patterns by completely disrupting them rather than modulating them. This "electromagnetic reset" hypothesis could explain ketamine's rapid but temporary antidepressant effects.
6. 5-MeO-DMT: Rapid Phase Transitions
6.1. The Breakthrough Experience
5-MeO-DMT, found naturally in the venom of the Sonoran Desert toad (Incilius alvarius) and various plants, produces the most rapid and overwhelming psychedelic experience of any known substance (Davis et al., 2019). Within seconds of inhalation, users report complete dissolution of self, time, and space, often described as merging with pure consciousness, the universe, or God (Barsuglia et al., 2018). Unlike the visual complexity of DMT or the emotional processing of psilocybin, 5-MeO-DMT produces a "white-out" experience of pure being without content—consciousness without objects (Reckweg et al., 2021).
The intensity and rapidity of 5-MeO-DMT's effects suggest a fundamental phase transition in the electromagnetic substrate of consciousness. Users consistently report that the experience feels like consciousness expanding beyond all boundaries instantaneously, as if the electromagnetic fields that normally define the self suddenly resonate with the entire universe (Timmermann et al., 2019). This may represent the closest approach to pure field consciousness achievable through pharmacological means—a state where electromagnetic resonance reaches maximum entropy before reorganizing into ordinary consciousness.
6.2. Electromagnetic Signatures of Ego Dissolution
EEG studies of 5-MeO-DMT reveal unprecedented changes in brain oscillations that correlate with the subjective intensity of ego dissolution (Timmermann et al., 2019). Within 30 seconds of administration, there is near-complete suppression of alpha rhythms across all cortical regions, more profound than that seen with any other psychedelic. This global alpha suppression removes all electromagnetic boundaries between brain regions, potentially allowing unlimited field propagation and resonance.
Gamma power shows a unique biphasic response: initial dramatic increase followed by subsequent decrease below baseline (Pallavicini et al., 2019). The initial gamma surge may reflect the moment of phase transition as electromagnetic fields suddenly synchronize across vast neural populations. The subsequent gamma suppression could indicate a state beyond ordinary oscillatory activity—a kind of electromagnetic stillness that paradoxically contains infinite potential, similar to the quantum vacuum state that contains all possible fluctuations.
Perhaps most remarkably, 5-MeO-DMT produces increased delta and theta power during peak effects, opposite to most psychedelics (Timmermann et al., 2019). These slow waves during full waking consciousness suggest a unique state combining features of deep sleep, dreaming, and alert awareness. The presence of slow waves may reflect global electromagnetic resonance at the lowest possible frequencies, maximizing the spatial extent of consciousness according to the boundary equation x = v/f.
6.3. Phase Transition Dynamics
The General Resonance Theory predicts that consciousness can undergo phase transitions when resonance reaches critical thresholds (Hunt & Schooler, 2019). 5-MeO-DMT appears to trigger exactly such a phase transition, temporarily pushing consciousness into a critical state at the edge of complete dissolution. Analysis of EEG complexity shows that brain activity under 5-MeO-DMT approaches criticality—the transition point between order and chaos where information processing is maximized (Tagliazucchi et al., 2014).
The return from 5-MeO-DMT states shows hysteresis effects characteristic of phase transitions. Users report that consciousness doesn't simply return to baseline but seems to reorganize from a more fundamental level, often with lasting changes in self-perception and worldview (Davis et al., 2019). Electromagnetic field patterns show similar hysteresis, with some alterations in coherence and coupling persisting for hours or days after the acute experience. This suggests that the phase transition induced by 5-MeO-DMT can shift consciousness into new stable states that persist after the drug clears.
Time-frequency analysis reveals that 5-MeO-DMT causes a collapse of the normal temporal hierarchy of brain oscillations (Timmermann et al., 2019). The usual nesting of faster rhythms within slower ones breaks down, creating a kind of temporal anarchy where all frequencies occur simultaneously without hierarchical organization. This temporal flattening may underlie the experience of timelessness and eternity that users report—without temporal hierarchy, consciousness exists in an eternal now where past, present, and future collapse into a single moment.
6.4. Endogenous DMT and Field Dynamics
The recent discovery that DMT (structurally similar to 5-MeO-DMT) may be produced endogenously in the human brain raises fascinating questions about the role of these molecules in normal consciousness (Barker, 2018). If the brain can produce its own DMT or 5-MeO-DMT, these substances might serve as emergency phase-reset mechanisms for consciousness—molecular switches that can rapidly reorganize electromagnetic field patterns when ordinary regulation fails.
Near-death experiences show remarkable phenomenological similarity to 5-MeO-DMT states, including ego dissolution, timelessness, and encounters with pure consciousness (Timmermann et al., 2018). The electromagnetic signatures of cardiac arrest—including surge of gamma activity followed by delta waves—parallel those seen with 5-MeO-DMT. This suggests that endogenous DMT release might mediate the phase transition of consciousness during extreme states, providing an electromagnetic escape route when ordinary consciousness becomes unsustainable.
7. Molecular Mechanisms to Field Modulation
7.1. The Neurotransmitter-Field Interface
In the General Resonance Theory framework, neurotransmitters serve not as the primary carriers of information but as energetic modulators of field computation (Hunt & Schooler, 2019). This perspective represents a fundamental inversion of traditional neuroscience, which views neurotransmitter release and receptor activation as the basic units of neural communication. Instead, GRT suggests that electromagnetic fields carry information while neurotransmitter systems provide the energetic infrastructure to sustain and modulate these fields (Hunt & Jones, 2023). This section examines how specific receptor mechanisms translate molecular binding events into alterations of the brain's electromagnetic landscape.
7.2. Serotonergic Mechanisms (LSD, Psilocybin, DMT)
The serotonergic psychedelics—LSD, psilocybin, and DMT—achieve their profound effects primarily through activation of the 5-HT2A receptor, though their activity at other receptor subtypes contributes to their unique profiles (Nichols, 2016). The 5-HT2A receptor shows highest expression on layer V pyramidal neurons in the cortex, particularly in frontal and visual regions (Weber & Andrade, 2010). These layer V pyramidals are uniquely positioned to influence electromagnetic fields because they possess the largest dendritic trees in the cortex, extending from deep layers to the cortical surface. This extensive dendritic arborization creates powerful electromagnetic dipoles when the neurons are activated (Anastassiou et al., 2011).
When psychedelics bind to 5-HT2A receptors, they trigger a Gq-protein coupled cascade that activates phospholipase C, ultimately leading to increased neuronal excitability through multiple mechanisms (González-Maeso et al., 2007). Intracellular calcium rises, depolarizing the membrane potential and moving neurons closer to firing threshold. Dendritic calcium spikes increase in frequency, creating powerful local electromagnetic fluctuations. The net effect is enhanced pyramidal cell depolarization that generates stronger dipole moments, directly amplifying the electromagnetic fields these neurons generate (Preller et al., 2018).
These molecular events trigger downstream field cascades that amplify far beyond the initial receptor activation. Enhanced pyramidal excitability leads to increased glutamate release, creating excitatory cascades that propagate through cortical circuits (Vollenweider & Preller, 2020). The resulting enhanced excitatory postsynaptic potentials generate increased gamma power in the 30 to 100 Hz range (Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2013). Simultaneously, altered timing of GABA release from interneurons disrupts normal inhibitory rhythms, particularly affecting alpha oscillations that normally segment and gate information flow (Kometer et al., 2013). The disruption of thalamocortical loops that generate alpha rhythms removes electromagnetic boundaries between processing streams (Preller et al., 2019).
Layer V pyramidal neurons deserve special attention because they generate the strongest electromagnetic fields in the cortex. Their apical dendrites extend through all cortical layers, creating dipoles that span the entire cortical thickness (Nunez & Srinivasan, 2006). When psychedelics activate 5-HT2A receptors on these neurons, the electromagnetic effects are maximized. This may explain why such tiny doses of LSD—mere micrograms—can produce hours of altered consciousness. The initial receptor activation triggers self-sustaining field resonances that persist long after the drug would be expected to clear from receptors (Nichols, 2016).
7.3. NMDA Antagonism (Ketamine)
Ketamine operates through an entirely different mechanism that produces correspondingly different field effects. As an NMDA receptor antagonist, ketamine blocks the ion channel that normally allows calcium and sodium influx when glutamate binds in the presence of membrane depolarization (Zorumski et al., 2016). Paradoxically, blocking this excitatory receptor increases neural activity through a disinhibition mechanism. NMDA receptors on GABAergic interneurons are more sensitive to ketamine than those on pyramidal cells (Homayoun & Moghaddam, 2007). When ketamine preferentially blocks interneuron NMDA receptors, these inhibitory cells reduce their firing, releasing pyramidal cells from inhibitory control.
Specific interneuron subtypes generate distinct oscillatory rhythms, and ketamine's disruption of these interneurons produces characteristic field signatures (Carlén et al., 2012). Parvalbumin-positive basket cells normally generate gamma oscillations through their fast, rhythmic inhibition of pyramidal cells. When ketamine suppresses these interneurons, gamma rhythms fragment into brief, high-frequency bursts rather than sustained oscillations (McNally et al., 2011). Somatostatin-positive interneurons regulate dendritic integration in pyramidal neurons. Their suppression by ketamine alters theta rhythms and disrupts the normal nesting of gamma within theta cycles (Kocsis, 2012). The combination of these interneuron-specific effects creates ketamine's unique electromagnetic signature of preserved local activity with disrupted global integration.
7.4. Receptor Density and Field Topography
The spatial distribution of receptors across brain regions shapes how psychedelics alter electromagnetic field topography (Beliveau et al., 2017). 5-HT2A receptors concentrate in layer V of frontal and visual cortices, creating hotspots where serotonergic psychedelics have maximal field effects. This distribution explains why visual hallucinations and altered self-perception are so prominent—these effects emerge from enhanced electromagnetic activity in visual and prefrontal regions rich in 5-HT2A receptors. NMDA receptors show high density in hippocampus and throughout the cortex, explaining ketamine's profound effects on memory-related theta fields and its global disruption of cortical gamma rhythms (Zorumski et al., 2016).
Receptor density gradients create preferred pathways for electromagnetic wave propagation under psychedelic influence (Preller et al., 2018). Waves of altered activity spread along these gradients, creating the complex spatiotemporal patterns observed in neuroimaging studies. The specific topography of each receptor system creates a unique electromagnetic landscape that each drug navigates differently, contributing to their distinct subjective effects (Vollenweider & Preller, 2020).
8. Cross-Substance Field Patterns and Principles
8.1. Common Field Mechanisms
Despite their different pharmacological mechanisms, all four substances examined share certain fundamental effects on electromagnetic fields that reveal core principles about how consciousness can be modulated. These commonalities suggest that while the specific routes differ, all psychedelics ultimately converge on similar field-level phenomena that expand or alter consciousness (Hunt & Schooler, 2019).
All psychedelics enhance fundamental field computation metrics that the General Resonance Theory identifies as crucial for consciousness. The 10,000-fold parallelism inherent in field processing becomes even more pronounced, with simultaneous information processing occurring across larger neural populations than in ordinary consciousness (Ruffini et al., 2020). The temporal resolution advantage of fields—100,000 times finer than synaptic processing—becomes fully utilized as psychedelics increase the complexity of electromagnetic patterns at microsecond timescales (Freeman, 2000). The energy efficiency of field computation, already 1,000-fold greater than spike-based coding, may explain how the brain sustains hours of intensified consciousness without metabolic exhaustion (Attwell & Laughlin, 2001).
Common resonance enhancement patterns emerge across all substances studied. Phase-locking between brain regions increases, creating stronger electromagnetic bonds between areas that normally operate more independently (Pallavicini et al., 2019). Inter-electrode coherence in EEG and ECoG recordings rises, indicating more synchronized field activity across the cortical surface (Schartner et al., 2017). The spatial boundaries of field influence expand, allowing electromagnetic effects to propagate further from their sources (Tagliazucchi et al., 2014). These enhanced resonance patterns may underlie the universal psychedelic experiences of unity, interconnectedness, and expanded awareness.
8.2. Substance-Specific Signatures
All psychedelics appear to preserve lower-level consciousness while expanding macro-conscious integration, supporting GRT's nested consciousness conjecture that "the many become one and are increased by one" (Hunt, 2020). Rather than simply overwhelming or replacing normal consciousness, psychedelics seem to incorporate and expand it, adding layers of awareness while maintaining more fundamental levels. This preservation of nested consciousness may explain why users maintain basic sensory and motor functions even during intense psychedelic experiences (Carhart-Harris & Friston, 2019).
Yet each substance also produces distinctive field signatures that correlate with their unique subjective effects. LSD creates sustained, stable enhancement of field coherence across all frequencies, reaching a new steady state with expanded boundaries but preserved structure (Carhart-Harris et al., 2016). This stability may underlie LSD's consistent effects throughout its long duration and the clarity users often report despite the intensity of the experience. Psilocybin generates dynamic, oscillating field patterns with variable coherence, moving between multiple attractor states (Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2013). This creates the characteristic "waves" of intensity where effects build, peak, and recede in cycles. Ketamine progressively fragments fields while preserving local activity, dissociating the system into isolated computational islands that can no longer communicate electromagnetically (Lee et al., 2013). This fragmentation directly parallels the subjective dissociation users experience. 5-MeO-DMT triggers complete phase transitions to maximum entropy states, briefly entering critical transition zones before rapid reorganization (Timmermann et al., 2019). This may represent the closest approach to the edge of what consciousness can sustain before complete dissolution.
8.3. Implications for the Binding Problem
These substance-specific patterns provide crucial evidence for the binding problem—the question of how distributed neural activity creates unified conscious experience (Singer, 1999). The field framework suggests that electromagnetic fields naturally integrate information across space through superposition, requiring no additional binding mechanism beyond the physics of field interaction (McFadden, 2020). Psychedelics support this view by demonstrating that consciousness can be expanded, fragmented, or reorganized by modulating field coherence. When fields resonate together more strongly, more elements bind into unified experience. When field coherence breaks down, as with ketamine, consciousness fragments correspondingly (Mashour, 2013).
8.4. Temporal Dynamics and Field-Consciousness Relationships
The temporal dynamics of different substances reveal important principles about field-consciousness relationships. Rapid-onset substances like 5-MeO-DMT and ketamine produce immediate field changes that correlate with nearly instantaneous alterations in consciousness, supporting the view that electromagnetic fields are the direct substrate of experience rather than an epiphenomenon (Hunt & Jones, 2023). The persistence of field changes after the drug has been metabolized—particularly evident with LSD—suggests that psychedelics can induce self-sustaining field resonances that maintain altered states beyond the period of receptor occupation (Nichols, 2016).
Cross-frequency coupling patterns show remarkable consistency across substances in some respects while diverging in others (Pallavicini et al., 2019). All psychedelics affect theta-gamma coupling, though in different ways—serotonergic psychedelics generally enhance it while ketamine disrupts it (Schomburg et al., 2014; Kocsis, 2012). This universal involvement of theta-gamma coupling suggests it may be a fundamental mechanism for consciousness modulation. Alpha rhythms are consistently affected, either through direct suppression (LSD, psilocybin) or through abnormal coupling with other frequencies (ketamine) (Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2013). The universal disruption of alpha rhythms may explain why all psychedelics affect the gating and segmentation of conscious experience (Klimesch, 2018).
9. Clinical and Therapeutic Implications
9.1. Field-Based Biomarkers
Understanding psychedelics as electromagnetic field modulators opens new avenues for therapeutic application and optimization. Rather than viewing these substances simply as pharmacological agents that trigger downstream psychological changes, we can conceptualize them as tools for directly restructuring the electromagnetic substrate of consciousness (Hunt & Schooler, 2019). This field-based perspective suggests novel biomarkers, intervention strategies, and theoretical frameworks for psychedelic therapy.
Predictive oscillatory signatures are beginning to emerge that could guide clinical application of psychedelics. Baseline EEG patterns may predict individual responses to different substances. For instance, individuals with rigid, low-entropy electromagnetic patterns might benefit more from psilocybin's field-flexibilizing effects, while those with already chaotic patterns might respond better to the organizing effects of low-dose LSD (Carhart-Harris & Nutt, 2017). Pre-treatment gamma power correlates with the intensity of psychedelic experiences, suggesting that baseline field states influence drug response (Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2013).
Real-time monitoring of field dynamics during psychedelic sessions could allow for dynamic dose adjustment and intervention timing. The appearance of specific electromagnetic signatures—such as increased gamma coherence or alpha suppression—could signal optimal windows for therapeutic intervention (Schartner et al., 2017). Conversely, signs of excessive field fragmentation might indicate the need for grounding techniques or anxiolytic support. This electromagnetic biofeedback approach could maximize therapeutic benefit while minimizing adverse experiences.
9.2. Optimizing Set and Setting Through Field Modulation
The concept of "set and setting"—the psychological mindset and physical environment during psychedelic experiences—gains new meaning through the field framework. Environmental electromagnetic fields may directly influence brain field dynamics during the heightened sensitivity of psychedelic states. Creating electromagnetically optimized therapeutic spaces with controlled field environments could enhance beneficial effects. This might include minimizing electromagnetic interference from electronic devices, using specific frequencies of light or sound to entrain desired brain rhythms, or employing weak transcranial electrical stimulation to guide field dynamics (Reinhart & Nguyen, 2019).
Music, known to profoundly influence psychedelic experiences, can be understood as acoustic waves that entrain electromagnetic brain oscillations (Kaelen et al., 2018). Different musical frequencies and rhythms could be selected to promote specific field states—theta-enhancing compositions for emotional processing, or alpha-entraining soundscapes for anxiety reduction. The timing of musical interventions could be synchronized with observed field states for maximum therapeutic impact.
9.3. Combination Therapies
The field framework suggests novel combination approaches that could enhance psychedelic therapy. Transcranial magnetic or electrical stimulation could be used to pre-condition electromagnetic field states before psychedelic administration, potentially reducing the dose needed for therapeutic effects (Pinotsis & Miller, 2023). Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques that enhance gamma oscillations might amplify psilocybin's consciousness-expanding effects, while theta stimulation could deepen emotional processing.
Meditation practices, which alter electromagnetic field dynamics in ways that partially overlap with psychedelics, could be systematically integrated into psychedelic therapy (Millière et al., 2018). Pre-session meditation might prepare the electromagnetic substrate for psychedelic modulation, while post-session practice could help maintain beneficial field changes. The combination of meditation and psychedelics might produce synergistic effects on field coherence and consciousness expansion.
9.4. Precision Medicine Approaches
Individual differences in electromagnetic field dynamics suggest the need for personalized psychedelic therapy protocols. Genetic variations affecting neurotransmitter systems translate into different baseline field states and drug responses (Ray, 2010). Structural brain differences influence electromagnetic field propagation patterns, potentially explaining why identical doses produce vastly different effects in different individuals. Age-related changes in field dynamics—such as slowing of alpha frequency and decreased gamma power—might require age-adjusted protocols (Voytek et al., 2015).
Machine learning analysis of pre-treatment EEG data could predict optimal substance selection, dosing, and therapeutic approach for each individual (Stevner et al., 2017). By identifying electromagnetic endophenotypes—characteristic field patterns associated with different psychiatric conditions—we could match specific psychedelic interventions to individual neurophysiological profiles. This precision medicine approach could dramatically improve therapeutic outcomes while reducing adverse effects.
10. Future Directions and Technological Integration
10.1. Advanced Field Recording Technologies
Next-generation electromagnetic recording technologies promise unprecedented insights into psychedelic effects on consciousness. High-density EEG arrays with thousands of electrodes could map field dynamics with millimeter spatial resolution while maintaining the temporal precision necessary to track rapid oscillatory changes (Baillet, 2017). Optically pumped magnetometers might detect the weak magnetic fields generated by neural activity without the cryogenic cooling required by traditional MEG, allowing naturalistic recording during psychedelic experiences (Boto et al., 2018).
Implantable wireless recording systems, already in development for clinical applications, could provide continuous monitoring of field dynamics throughout extended psychedelic experiences (Vázquez-Guardado et al., 2020). These devices could track the full time course of psychedelic effects from baseline through acute experience to long-term integration, revealing how field changes evolve over days and weeks. Combined with closed-loop stimulation capabilities, such systems could both monitor and modulate electromagnetic fields in real-time.
10.2. Field Stimulation and Psychedelic Synergy
Emerging electromagnetic stimulation technologies could work synergistically with psychedelics to enhance therapeutic outcomes. Transcranial focused ultrasound can non-invasively modulate deep brain structures with millimeter precision, potentially allowing targeted enhancement of psychedelic effects in specific regions (Fomenko et al., 2018). Temporal interference stimulation could selectively modulate specific frequency bands while leaving others unaffected, providing precise control over cross-frequency coupling patterns that psychedelics alter (Grossman et al., 2017).
Closed-loop stimulation systems that adjust parameters based on real-time field recordings could maintain optimal electromagnetic states throughout psychedelic sessions (Ezzyat et al., 2018). If excessive gamma synchrony produces anxiety, the system could automatically apply desynchronizing stimulation. If theta rhythms weaken during crucial emotional processing, theta-frequency stimulation could boost these oscillations. This dynamic field management could maximize therapeutic benefit while minimizing challenging experiences.
10.3. Computational Modeling and Prediction
Detailed computational models of how psychedelics alter electromagnetic field dynamics could revolutionize both research and therapy. Biophysically realistic simulations incorporating receptor distributions, neural morphology, and field propagation physics could predict how different doses and combinations affect consciousness (Ruffini et al., 2020). These models could be personalized using individual brain imaging and EEG data, allowing in silico testing of different therapeutic protocols before actual administration.
Machine learning analysis of large-scale electromagnetic recordings during psychedelic experiences could identify novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets (Stevner et al., 2017). Deep learning networks might discover field patterns invisible to traditional analysis that predict therapeutic outcomes or adverse effects. Natural language processing of experience reports combined with simultaneous field recordings could map the relationship between electromagnetic signatures and subjective phenomena, creating a "field-phenomenology dictionary" for different states of consciousness.
10.4. Theoretical Advances
The psychedelic renaissance offers an unprecedented opportunity to test and refine electromagnetic field theories of consciousness. Key questions remain about the relationship between field dynamics and subjective experience. Does the bandwidth of electromagnetic communication between brain regions determine the richness of conscious experience? Are there fundamental field configurations that correspond to universal aspects of consciousness like the sense of self or the experience of time? Can we identify electromagnetic signatures of specific qualia—the redness of red or the painfulness of pain?
The General Resonance Theory makes specific predictions about psychedelic effects that can be tested with current technology (Hunt & Schooler, 2019). The boundary equation x = v/f predicts that reducing oscillation frequency while maintaining propagation velocity should expand the spatial extent of consciousness—testable by measuring field coherence lengths under different psychedelics. The nested consciousness conjecture suggests that psychedelics should preserve lower-frequency oscillations while modulating higher frequencies—verifiable through detailed spectral analysis. The shared resonance mechanism implies that the degree of phase-locking between regions should correlate with the unity of conscious experience—measurable through phase coherence analysis during ego dissolution experiences.
11. Challenges and Limitations
11.1. Technical Challenges
Current electromagnetic recording technologies face significant limitations in capturing the full complexity of psychedelic effects on brain fields. Spatial resolution remains limited even with high-density arrays, potentially missing fine-scale field dynamics crucial for consciousness (Buzsáki et al., 2012). The skull and scalp severely attenuate high-frequency components that may be important for psychedelic effects, with signals above 100 Hz largely invisible to scalp EEG (Nunez & Srinivasan, 2006). Movement artifacts during psychedelic experiences can contaminate recordings, particularly problematic given that users often cannot remain still during intense experiences (Urigüen & Garcia-Zapirain, 2015).
Temporal dynamics spanning from milliseconds to hours require recording systems with enormous dynamic range and data storage capacity. Capturing both the rapid oscillations associated with conscious processing and the slow changes over a twelve-hour LSD experience challenges current technology. The non-stationary nature of psychedelic effects means that traditional analysis methods assuming signal stationarity may miss important dynamics (Cohen, 2017).
11.2. Interpretive Challenges
Correlating electromagnetic recordings with subjective experience remains profoundly challenging. The "hard problem" of consciousness—explaining how physical processes give rise to subjective experience—applies fully to understanding psychedelic states (Chalmers, 1995). Even if we can perfectly measure electromagnetic fields, explaining why particular field configurations produce specific qualia remains mysterious. Individual variability in both field dynamics and subjective reports makes it difficult to identify universal principles (Carhart-Harris & Nutt, 2017).
The ineffability of psychedelic experiences poses particular challenges for scientific study. Users often report that their experiences are beyond words, making it difficult to correlate field measurements with subjective phenomena (Griffiths et al., 2016). The altered sense of time, space, and self under psychedelics may render normal descriptive categories inadequate. Rating scales and questionnaires developed for ordinary consciousness may fail to capture the essential features of psychedelic states (Studerus et al., 2011).
11.3. Theoretical Limitations
While the electromagnetic field framework offers compelling explanations for many aspects of psychedelic effects, important limitations remain. The relationship between electromagnetic fields and consciousness remains correlational rather than definitively causal—we observe that field changes accompany altered consciousness but cannot prove fields are consciousness (Seth & Bayne, 2022). Alternative theories proposing that consciousness emerges from information integration, global workspace dynamics, or quantum processes offer competing explanations for psychedelic effects (Tononi et al., 2016; Dehaene, 2014; Hameroff & Penrose, 2014).
The spatial scale at which electromagnetic fields influence consciousness remains unclear. While we focus on fields measurable at the millimeter to centimeter scale, consciousness might depend on quantum-scale electromagnetic phenomena below our current detection threshold (Tegmark, 2000). Alternatively, consciousness might emerge from electromagnetic resonance between brains, bodies, and environment at scales larger than typically measured (Young et al., 2022). Some researchers suggest that psychedelics might affect quantum processes in microtubules or other subcellular structures, adding another layer of complexity to the field dynamics (Hameroff & Penrose, 2014).
11.4. Ethical and Practical Considerations
The illegal status of many psychedelics in most jurisdictions severely limits research opportunities (Nutt et al., 2013). Even in approved studies, the intense nature of psychedelic experiences makes it difficult to maintain the controlled conditions ideal for electrophysiological recording. Participants may be unable or unwilling to remain still during peak effects, and the profound subjective experiences may interfere with their ability to perform tasks or respond to experimental probes (Carhart-Harris et al., 2016). The therapeutic context often necessary for ethical psychedelic administration may conflict with the requirements of rigorous neuroscience research (Johnson et al., 2008).
Despite these challenges, the convergence of psychedelic renaissance with advances in field recording and analysis techniques offers unprecedented opportunities. New high-density recording arrays, machine learning analysis methods, and theoretical frameworks are rapidly advancing our ability to characterize consciousness and its modulation (Stevner et al., 2017). The growing acceptance of psychedelics in therapeutic contexts provides expanded opportunities for research (Carhart-Harris & Goodwin, 2017). As we develop better tools and theories, the electromagnetic field framework may prove to be the key to understanding not just psychedelic effects but consciousness itself.
12. Conclusion
This examination of psychedelics through the electromagnetic field framework—what we might call the electrodynamics of consciousness—reveals a coherent picture that fundamentally challenges conventional neuroscience assumptions about the nature of awareness. These substances appear to act not as simple pharmacological agents but as field resonance modulators that directly alter the electromagnetic substrate of conscious experience. The evidence from multiple scales of recording converges on the principle that consciousness emerges from resonant electromagnetic field interactions, with psychedelics providing a unique window into this process by temporarily altering field parameters that evolution has optimized over millions of years.
The distinct field signatures of different psychedelic molecules—LSD's sustained coherence enhancement, psilocybin's dynamic flexibility, ketamine's dissociative fragmentation, and 5-MeO-DMT's rapid phase transitions—demonstrate that specific alterations to electromagnetic dynamics produce predictable changes in consciousness. These patterns suggest that the quality and content of conscious experience depend on particular field configurations, with each configuration representing a different region of consciousness space that psychedelics allow us to explore. As James, Leary, and Alpert pioneered the scientific study of altered states, this field-based framework may significantly change our understanding of consciousness and the psychedelic experience.
The molecular mechanisms through which psychedelics achieve these effects support a fundamental reconceptualization of neurotransmission. Rather than carrying information through specific patterns of release and receptor activation, neurotransmitter systems appear to serve primarily as energetic modulators that tune the frequency, amplitude, and coherence of electromagnetic fields. This view positions fields as the primary substrate of consciousness, with chemical neurotransmission providing the metabolic support and modulation necessary to maintain and adjust field dynamics—a perspective that would have resonated with James's radical empiricism and his emphasis on the stream of consciousness as fundamental.
The therapeutic implications of this framework extend beyond optimizing current psychedelic treatments to suggest entirely new approaches to mental health. If psychiatric conditions represent stable but maladaptive field configurations, then the ability to directly modulate electromagnetic dynamics through psychedelics, field stimulation, or their combination offers unprecedented therapeutic possibilities. The persistent field changes observed after psychedelic sessions suggest that brief interventions can produce lasting reorganization of consciousness, explaining the enduring benefits reported in clinical trials and validating the transformative experiences that Leary and Alpert documented in their early Harvard research.
Looking toward the future, the marriage of psychedelic science with electromagnetic field theories promises to revolutionize our understanding of consciousness. As we develop technologies to measure and modulate fields with greater precision, map the full parameter space of possible field configurations, and understand the bridge principles connecting electromagnetic dynamics to subjective experience, we approach a truly scientific understanding of consciousness that explains not just its neural correlates but its fundamental nature—fulfilling the vision that James articulated over a century ago of a science that could encompass both the physical and phenomenological aspects of mind.
The psychedelic renaissance, viewed through the field framework, represents not just a resurgence of interest in these remarkable molecules but a fundamental expansion of human knowledge about the nature of consciousness itself. In the tradition of Einstein's electrodynamics that revealed the deeper unity of space, time, and energy, this electrodynamics of consciousness reveals the deeper unity of mind, brain, and electromagnetic fields. And in the tradition of James, Leary, and Alpert, who recognized that altered states could illuminate fundamental truths about consciousness, this framework provides the scientific foundation for understanding how molecules can serve as technologies for exploring the furthest reaches of human experience. The psychedelic experience, understood through electromagnetic field dynamics, becomes a journey not into distortion or hallucination, but into the fundamental physics of consciousness itself—a physics that suggests awareness is not generated by the brain but organized by it through resonant electromagnetic fields that psychedelics temporarily reconfigure, allowing us glimpses of the vast possibilities inherent in the nature of mind.
References
- Alexander, D.M.; Jurica, P.; Trengove, C.; Nikolaev, A.R.; Gepshtein, S.; Zvyagintsev, M.; Mathiak, K.; Schulze-Bonhage, A.; Ruescher, J.; Ball, T.; et al. Traveling waves and trial averaging: The nature of single-trial and averaged brain responses in large-scale cortical signals. NeuroImage 2013, 73, 95–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alkire, M.T.; Hudetz, A.G.; Tononi, G. Consciousness and anesthesia. Science 2008, 322, 876–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anastassiou, C.A.; Koch, C. Ephaptic coupling to endogenous electric field activity: Why bother? Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2015, 31, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anastassiou, C.A.; Montgomery, S.M.; Barahona, M.; Buzsáki, G.; Koch, C. The effect of spatially inhomogeneous extracellular electric fields on neurons. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30, 1925–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anastassiou, C.A.; Perin, R.; Markram, H.; Koch, C. Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons. Nature Neuroscience 2011, 14, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Attwell, D.; Laughlin, S.B. An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2001, 21, 1133–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagur, S.; Benchenane, K. The theta rhythm mixes and matches gamma oscillations cycle by cycle. Neuron 2018, 100, 773–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baillet, S. Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging. Nature Neuroscience 2017, 20, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballard, E.D.; Zarate, C.A.; Jr. The role of dissociation in ketamine's antidepressant effects. Nature Communications 2020, 11, 6431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barker, S.A. N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), an endogenous hallucinogen: Past, present, and future research to determine its role and function. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2018, 12, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barrett, F.S.; Bradstreet, M.P.; Leoutsakos, J.M.S.; Johnson, M.W.; Griffiths, R.R. The Challenging Experience Questionnaire: Characterization of challenging experiences with psilocybin mushrooms. Journal of Psychopharmacology 2016, 30, 1279–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett, F.S.; Johnson, M.W.; Griffiths, R.R. Validation of the revised Mystical Experience Questionnaire in experimental sessions with psilocybin. Journal of Psychopharmacology 2015, 29, 1182–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barsuglia, J.; Davis, A.K.; Palmer, R.; Lancelotta, R.; Windham-Herman, A.-M.; Peterson, K.; Polanco, M.; Grant, R.; Griffiths, R.R. Intensity of mystical experiences occasioned by 5-MeO-DMT and comparison with a prior psilocybin study. Frontiers in Psychology 2018, 9, 2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bastos, A.M.; Loonis, R.; Kornblith, S.; Lundqvist, M.; Miller, E.K. Laminar recordings in frontal cortex suggest distinct layers for maintenance and control of working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2018, 115, 1117–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beggs, J.M.; Plenz, D. Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits. Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 23, 11167–11177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beliveau, V.; Ganz, M.; Feng, L.; Ozenne, B.; Højgaard, L.; Fisher, P.M.; Svarer, C.; Greve, D.N.; Knudsen, G.M. A high-resolution in vivo atlas of the human brain's serotonin system. Journal of Neuroscience 2017, 37, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belluscio, M.A.; Mizuseki, K.; Schmidt, R.; Kempter, R.; Buzsáki, G. Cross-frequency phase–phase coupling between theta and gamma oscillations in the hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berkovich-Ohana, A. A case study of a meditation-induced altered state: Increased overall gamma synchronization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2017, 16, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berkovich-Ohana, A. The hitchhiker's guide to neurophenomenology: The case of studying self boundaries with meditators. Frontiers in Psychology 2024, 15, 1321623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blumenfeld, H. Impaired consciousness in epilepsy. The Lancet Neurology 2012, 11, 814–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boto, E.; Holmes, N.; Leggett, J.; Roberts, G.; Shah, V.; Meyer, S.S.; Muñoz, L.D.; Mullinger, K.J.; Tierney, T.M.; Bestmann, S.; et al. Moving magnetoencephalography towards real-world applications with a wearable system. Nature 2018, 555, 657–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brown, E.N.; Lydic, R.; Schiff, N.D. General anesthesia, sleep, and coma. New England Journal of Medicine 2010, 363, 2638–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buzsáki, G. Theta oscillations in the hippocampus. Neuron 2002, 33, 325–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buzsáki, G.; Anastassiou, C.A.; Koch, C. The origin of extracellular fields and currents—EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2012, 13, 407–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Buzsáki, G.; Logothetis, N.; Singer, W. Scaling brain size, keeping timing: Evolutionary preservation of brain rhythms. Neuron 2013, 80, 751–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canolty, R.T.; Knight, R.T. The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carbonaro, T.M.; Bradstreet, M.P.; Barrett, F.S.; MacLean, K.A.; Jesse, R.; Johnson, M.W.; Griffiths, R.R. Survey study of challenging experiences after ingesting psilocybin mushrooms: Acute and enduring positive and negative consequences. Journal of Psychopharmacology 2016, 30, 1268–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Friston, K.J. REBUS and the anarchic brain: Toward a unified model of the brain action of psychedelics. Pharmacological Reviews 2019, 71, 316–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Goodwin, G.M. The therapeutic potential of psychedelic drugs: Past, present, and future. Neuropsychopharmacology 2017, 42, 2105–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Nutt, D.J. Serotonin and brain function: A tale of two receptors. Journal of Psychopharmacology 2017, 31, 1091–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Bolstridge, M.; Day, C.M.J.; Rucker, J.; Watts, R.; Erritzoe, D.E.; Kaelen, M.; Giribaldi, B.; Bloomfield, M.; Pilling, S.; et al. Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: Six-month follow-up. Psychopharmacology 2018, 235, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Leech, R.; Hellyer, P.J.; Shanahan, M.; Feilding, A.; Tagliazucchi, E.; Chialvo, D.R.; Nutt, D. The entropic brain: A theory of conscious states informed by neuroimaging research with psychedelic drugs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2014, 8, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Muthukumaraswamy, S.; Roseman, L.; Kaelen, M.; Droog, W.; Murphy, K.; Tagliazucchi, E.; Schenberg, E.E.; Nest, T.; Orban, C.; et al. Neural correlates of the LSD experience revealed by multimodal neuroimaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2016, 113, 4853–4858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Roseman, L.; Bolstridge, M.; Demetriou, L.; Pannekoek, J.N.; Wall, M.B.; Tanner, M.; Kaelen, M.; McGonigle, J.; Murphy, K.; et al. Psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression: fMRI-measured brain mechanisms. Scientific Reports 2017, 7, 13187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlen, M.; Meletis, K.; Siegle, J.H.; Cardin, J.A.; Futai, K.; Vierling-Claassen, D.; Rühlmann, C.; Jones, S.R.; Deisseroth, K.; Sheng, M.; et al. A critical role for NMDA receptors in parvalbumin interneurons for gamma rhythm induction and behavior. Molecular Psychiatry 2012, 17, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chalmers, D.J. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 1995, 2, 200–219. [Google Scholar]
- Chiang, A.K.; Rennie, C.J.; Robinson, P.A.; van Albada, S.J.; Kerr, C.C. Age trends and sex differences of alpha rhythms including split alpha peaks. Clinical Neurophysiology 2011, 122, 1505–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, M.X. Where does EEG come from and what does it mean? Trends in Neurosciences 2017, 40, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crick, F.; Koch, C. Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences 1990, 2, 263–275. [Google Scholar]
- Crone, N.E.; Sinai, A.; Korzeniewska, A. High-frequency gamma oscillations and human brain mapping with electrocorticography. Progress in Brain Research 2006, 159, 275–295. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Cunha, J.P.; Choupina, H.M.; Rocha, A.P.; Fernandes, J.M.; Achilles, F.; Loesch, A.M.; ... Vollmar, C. Ephaptic coupling contributes to neural network complexity. Physical Review E 2024, 109, 024302.
- Davis, A.K.; Barsuglia, J.; Lancelotta, R.; Grant, R.M.; Renn, E. The epidemiology of 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) use: Benefits, consequences, patterns of use, subjective effects, and reasons for consumption. Journal of Psychopharmacology 2019, 33, 695–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dehaene, S. (2014). Consciousness and the brain: Deciphering how the brain codes our thoughts. Viking Press.
- Doss, M.K.; Považan, M.; Rosenberg, M.D.; Sepeda, N.D.; Davis, A.K.; Finan, P.H.; Smith, G.S.; Pekar, J.J.; Barker, P.B.; Griffiths, R.R.; et al. Psilocybin therapy increases cognitive and neural flexibility in patients with major depressive disorder. Translational Psychiatry 2021, 11, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Einevoll, G.T.; Kayser, C.; Logothetis, N.K.; Panzeri, S. Modelling and analysis of local field potentials for studying the function of cortical circuits. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2013, 14, 770–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Engel, A.K.; Fries, P.; Singer, W. Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2001, 2, 704–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ezzyat, Y.; Wanda, P.A.; Levy, D.F.; Kadel, A.; Aka, A.; Pedisich, I.; Sperling, M.R.; Sharan, A.D.; Lega, B.C.; Burks, A.; et al. Closed-loop stimulation of temporal cortex rescues functional networks and improves memory. Nature Communications 2018, 9, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiebelkorn, I.C.; Pinsk, M.A.; Kastner, S. A dynamic interplay within the frontoparietal network underlies rhythmic spatial attention. Neuron 2018, 99, 842–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fomenko, A.; Neudorfer, C.; Dallapiazza, R.F.; Kalia, S.K.; Lozano, A.M. Low-intensity ultrasound neuromodulation: An overview of mechanisms and emerging human applications. Brain Stimulation 2018, 11, 1209–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Freeman, W.J. (2000). Neurodynamics: An exploration in mesoscopic brain dynamics. Springer-Verlag.
- Freeman, W.J. Origin, structure, and role of background EEG activity. Part 2: Analytic phase. Clinical Neurophysiology 2004, 115, 2089–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furness, J.B. The enteric nervous system and neurogastroenterology. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2012, 9, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Argibay, M.; Santed, M.A.; Reales, J.M. Efficacy of binaural auditory beats in cognition, anxiety, and pain perception: A meta-analysis. Psychological Research 2019, 83, 357–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giacino, J.T.; Fins, J.J.; Laureys, S.; Schiff, N.D. Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: The state of the science. Nature Reviews Neurology 2014, 10, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Maeso, J.; Weisstaub, N.V.; Zhou, M.; Chan, P.; Ivic, L.; Ang, R.; Lira, A.; Bradley-Moore, M.; Ge, Y.; Zhou, Q.; et al. Hallucinogens recruit specific cortical 5-HT2A receptor-mediated signaling pathways to affect behavior. Neuron 2007, 53, 439–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffiths, R.R.; Johnson, M.W.; A Carducci, M.; Umbricht, A.; A Richards, W.; Richards, B.D.; Cosimano, M.P.; A Klinedinst, M. Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial. Journal of Psychopharmacology 2016, 30, 1181–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grimmer, H.E.; Laukkonen, R.; Friston, K.J.; von Hippel, W. (2023). The psychedelic-wellness nexus and false insights. PsyArXiv.
- Grossman, N.; Bono, D.; Dedic, N.; Kodandaramaiah, S.B.; Rudenko, A.; Suk, H.-J.; Cassara, A.M.; Neufeld, E.; Kuster, N.; Tsai, L.-H.; et al. Noninvasive deep brain stimulation via temporally interfering electric fields. Cell 2017, 169, 1029–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Halberstadt, A.L. Recent advances in the neuropsychopharmacology of serotonergic hallucinogens. Behavioural Brain Research 2015, 277, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hameroff, S.; Penrose, R. Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory. Physics of Life Reviews 2014, 11, 39–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, J.J.; Jolivet, R.; Attwell, D. Synaptic energy use and supply. Neuron 2012, 75, 762–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heusser, A.C.; Poeppel, D.; Ezzyat, Y.; Davachi, L. Episodic sequence memory is supported by a theta–gamma phase code. Nature Neuroscience 2016, 19, 1374–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hofmann, A. (1980). LSD: My problem child. McGraw-Hill.
- Homayoun, H.; Moghaddam, B. NMDA receptor hypofunction produces opposite effects on prefrontal cortex interneurons and pyramidal neurons. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27, 11496–11500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howarth, C.; Gleeson, P.; Attwell, D. Updated energy budgets for neural computation in the neocortex and cerebellum. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2012, 32, 1222–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunt, T. (2020). The Hippies were right: It's all about vibrations, man! Scientific American Observations Blog.
- Hunt, T.; Jones, M.W. Fields or firings? Comparing the spike code and the electromagnetic field hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology 2023, 14, 1029715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunt, T.; Schooler, J.W. The easy part of the hard problem: A resonance theory of consciousness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2019, 13, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. Longmans, Green, and Co.
- Johnson, M.W.; Richards, W.A.; Griffiths, R.R. Human hallucinogen research: Guidelines for safety. Journal of Psychopharmacology 2008, 22, 603–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Juan, C.H.; Walsh, V. Feedback improves the perception of body ownership in the rubber hand illusion. Perception 2003, 32, 703–714. [Google Scholar]
- Kaelen, M.; Giribaldi, B.; Raine, J.; Evans, L.; Timmerman, C.; Rodriguez, N.; Roseman, L.; Feilding, A.; Nutt, D.; Carhart-Harris, R. The hidden therapist: Evidence for a central role of music in psychedelic therapy. Psychopharmacology 2018, 235, 505–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kajikawa, Y.; Schroeder, C.E. How local is the local field potential? Neuron 2011, 72, 847–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kilner, J.M.; Kiebel, S.J.; Friston, K.J. Applications of random field theory to electrophysiology. Neuroscience Letters 2005, 374, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.; Kim, J.S. Alterations in gamma-band oscillations and synchrony during ketamine-induced dissociation: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2019, 98, 122–134. [Google Scholar]
- Klimesch, W. The frequency architecture of brain and brain-body oscillations: An analysis. European Journal of Neuroscience 2018, 48, 2431–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koch, C. (2019). The feeling of life itself: Why consciousness is widespread but can't be computed. MIT Press.
- Koch, C.; Massimini, M.; Boly, M.; Tononi, G. Neural correlates of consciousness: Progress and problems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2016, 17, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kocsis, B. Differential role of NR2A and NR2B subunits in N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist-induced aberrant cortical gamma oscillations. Biological Psychiatry 2012, 71, 987–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kometer, M.; Cahn, B.R.; Andel, D.; Carter, O.L.; Vollenweider, F.X. The 5-HT2A/1A agonist psilocybin disrupts modal object completion associated with visual hallucinations. Biological Psychiatry 2011, 69, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kometer, M.; Schmidt, A.; Jäncke, L.; Vollenweider, F.X. Activation of serotonin 2A receptors underlies the psilocybin-induced effects on α oscillations, N170 visual-evoked potentials, and visual hallucinations. Journal of Neuroscience 2013, 33, 10544–10551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kometer, M.; Schmidt, A.; Bachmann, R.; Studerus, E.; Seifritz, E.; Vollenweider, F.X. Psilocybin biases facial recognition, goal-directed behavior, and mood state toward positive relative to negative emotions through different serotonergic subreceptors. Biological Psychiatry 2015, 72, 898–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozma, R.; Freeman, W.J. Chaotic resonance: Methods and applications for robust classification of noisy and variable patterns. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 2001, 11, 1607–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lakatos, P.; Shah, A.S.; Knuth, K.H.; Ulbert, I.; Karmos, G.; Schroeder, C.E. An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005, 94, 1904–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamme, V.A. Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention: A case for phenomenal awareness. Neural Networks 2004, 17, 861–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laukkonen, R.E.; Slagter, H.A.; Lomas, T.; Schooler, J.W. (2025). A Beautiful Loop: The psychedelic experience through predictive processing. Draft manuscript.
- Leary, T.; Metzner, R.; Alpert, R. (1964). The psychedelic experience: A manual based on the Tibetan Book of the Dead. University Books.
- Lee, K.H.; Williams, L.M.; Breakspear, M.; Gordon, E. Cell-class-specific electric field entrainment of neural activity. Cell 2024, 187, 3889–3903. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, U.; Kim, S.; Noh, G.J.; Choi, B.M.; Hwang, E.; Mashour, G.A. Disruption of frontal–parietal communication by ketamine, propofol, and sevoflurane. Anesthesiology 2013, 118, 1264–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leszczynski, M.; Schroeder, C.E. The role of neuronal oscillations in visual active sensing. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 2019, 13, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leszczynski, M.; Staudigl, T.; Chaieb, L.; Enkirch, S.J.; Fell, J.; Schroeder, C.E. Saccadic modulation of neural excitability in auditory areas of the neocortex. Current Biology 2020, 30, 3183–3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levin, M.; Pezzulo, G.; Finkelstein, J.M. Endogenous bioelectric signaling networks: Exploiting voltage gradients for control of growth and form. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2017, 19, 353–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lisman, J.E.; Jensen, O. The theta-gamma neural code. Neuron 2013, 77, 1002–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopes-Dos-Santos, V.; Ribeiro, S.; Tort, A.B. Detecting cell assemblies in large neuronal populations. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2018, 295, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ly, C.; Greb, A.C.; Cameron, L.P.; Wong, J.M.; Barragan, E.V.; Wilson, P.C.; Burbach, K.F.; Zarandi, S.S.; Sood, A.; Paddy, M.R.; et al. Psychedelics promote structural and functional neural plasticity. Cell Reports 2018, 23, 3170–3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magistretti, P.J.; Allaman, I. A cellular perspective on brain energy metabolism and functional imaging. Neuron 2015, 86, 883–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mashour, G.A. Cognitive unbinding: A neuroscientific paradigm of general anesthesia and related states of unconsciousness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2013, 37, 2751–2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mason, N.L.; Kuypers, K.P.C.; Müller, F.; Reckweg, J.; Tse, D.H.Y.; Toennes, S.W.; Hutten, N.R.P.W.; Jansen, J.F.A.; Stiers, P.; Feilding, A.; et al. Me, myself, bye: Regional alterations in glutamate and the experience of ego dissolution with psilocybin. Neuropsychopharmacology 2021, 45, 2003–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McCraty, R.; Shaffer, F. Heart rate variability: New perspectives on physiological mechanisms, assessment of self-regulatory capacity, and health risk. Global Advances in Health and Medicine 2015, 4, 46–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McFadden, J. Integrating information in the brain's EM field: The cemi field theory of consciousness. Neuroscience of Consciousness 2020, 2020, niaa016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McGovern, H.T.; Grimmer, H.E.; Doss, M.K.; Hutchinson, B.K.; Barnes, G.R.; Timmermann, C.; Laukkonen, R.E. (2024). False Insights and Beliefs from Inference through Unconstrained Spreading (FIBUS) explain psychedelic and psychosis-related beliefs. PsyArXiv.
- McNally, J.M.; McCarley, R.W.; Brown, R.E. Impaired GABAergic neurotransmission in schizophrenia underlies impairments in cortical gamma band oscillations. Current Psychiatry Reports 2011, 15, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, H.C.; Odriozola, P.; Cohodes, E.M.; Mandell, J.D.; Li, A.; Yang, R.; Hall, B.S.; Haberman, J.T.; Zacharek, S.J.; Liston, C.; et al. Ventral hippocampus interacts with prelimbic cortex during inhibition of threat response via learned safety in both mice and humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2017, 114, 4507–4512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miller, R.; Schreiner, L. Laminar interactions evoke gamma-band neuronal oscillation in cat primary visual cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 12, 589–597. [Google Scholar]
- Millière, R.; Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Roseman, L.; Trautwein, F.M.; Berkovich-Ohana, A. Psychedelics, meditation, and self-consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology 2018, 9, 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, J.M.; Bogenschutz, M.; Lilienstein, A.; Harrison, C.; Kleiman, S.; Parker-Guilbert, K.; G. , M.O.; Garas, W.; Paleos, C.; Gorman, I.; et al. MDMA-assisted therapy for severe PTSD: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Nature Medicine 2021, 27, 1025–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montgomery, S.M.; Sirota, A.; Buzsáki, G. Theta and gamma coordination of hippocampal networks during waking and rapid eye movement sleep. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28, 6731–6741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muthukumaraswamy, S.D.; Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Moran, R.J.; Brookes, M.J.; Williams, T.M.; Errtizoe, D.; Sessa, B.; Papadopoulos, A.; Bolstridge, M.; Singh, K.D.; et al. Broadband cortical desynchronization underlies the human psychedelic state. Journal of Neuroscience 2013, 33, 15171–15183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muthukumaraswamy, S.D.; Shaw, A.D.; Jackson, L.E.; Hall, J.; Moran, R.; Saxena, N. Evidence that subanesthetic doses of ketamine cause sustained disruptions of NMDA and AMPA-mediated frontoparietal connectivity in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 2015, 35, 11694–11706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narikiyo, K.; Mizuguchi, R.; Ajima, A.; Shiozaki, M.; Hamanaka, H.; Johansen, J.P.; Mori, K.; Yoshihara, Y. The claustrum coordinates cortical slow-wave activity. Nature Neuroscience 2020, 23, 741–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nichols, D.E. Psychedelics. Pharmacological Reviews 2016, 68, 264–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishida, M.; Pearsall, J.; Buckner, R.L.; Walker, M.P. REM sleep, prefrontal theta, and the consolidation of human emotional memory. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 19, 1158–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunez, P.L.; Srinivasan, R. (2006). Electric fields of the brain: The neurophysics of EEG. Oxford University Press.
- Nutt, D.J.; King, L.A.; Nichols, D.E. Effects of Schedule I drug laws on neuroscience research and treatment innovation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2013, 14, 577–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozen, S.; Sirota, A.; Belluscio, M.A.; Anastassiou, C.A.; Stark, E.; Koch, C.; Buzsáki, G. Transcranial electric stimulation entrains cortical neuronal populations in rats. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30, 11476–11485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Palhano-Fontes, F.; Barreto, D.; Onias, H.; Andrade, K.C.; Novaes, M.M.; Pessoa, J.A.; Mota-Rolim, S.A.; Osório, F.L.; Sanches, R.; dos Santos, R.G.; et al. Rapid antidepressant effects of the psychedelic ayahuasca in treatment-resistant depression: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Psychological Medicine 2019, 49, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallavicini, C.; Vilas, M.G.; Villarreal, M.; Zamberlan, F.; Muthukumaraswamy, S.; Nutt, D.; Carhart-Harris, R.; Tagliazucchi, E. Spectral signatures of serotonergic psychedelics and glutamatergic dissociatives. NeuroImage 2019, 200, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Passie, T.; Halpern, J.H.; Stichtenoth, D.O.; Emrich, H.M.; Hintzen, A. The pharmacology of lysergic acid diethylamide: A review. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 2008, 14, 295–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pinotsis, D.A.; Miller, E.K. In vivo ephaptic coupling allows memory network formation. Cerebral Cortex 2023, 33, 5915–5929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pinotsis, D.A.; Buschman, T.J.; Miller, E.K. Working memory load modulates neuronal coupling. Cerebral Cortex 2023, 33, 3759–3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pletzer, B.; Kerschbaum, H.; Klimesch, W. When frequencies never synchronize: The golden mean and the resting EEG. Brain Research 2010, 1335, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pockett, S. (2000). The nature of consciousness: A hypothesis. iUniverse.
- Preller, K.H.; Burt, J.B.; Ji, J.L.; Schleifer, C.H.; Adkinson, B.D.; Stämpfli, P.; Seifritz, E.; Repovs, G.; Krystal, J.H.; Murray, J.D.; et al. Changes in global and thalamic brain connectivity in LSD-induced altered states of consciousness are attributable to the 5-HT2A receptor. eLife 2018, 7, e35082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preller, K.H.; Razi, A.; Zeidman, P.; Stämpfli, P.; Friston, K.J.; Vollenweider, F.X. Effective connectivity changes in LSD-induced altered states of consciousness in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2019, 116, 2743–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Principe, J.C.; Tavares, V.G.; Harris, J.G.; Freeman, W.J. Design and implementation of a biologically realistic olfactory cortex in analog VLSI. Proceedings of the IEEE 2001, 89, 1030–1051. [Google Scholar]
- Purdon, P.L.; Pierce, E.T.; Mukamel, E.A.; Prerau, M.J.; Walsh, J.L.; Wong, K.F.K.; Salazar-Gomez, A.F.; Harrell, P.G.; Sampson, A.L.; Cimenser, A.; et al. Electroencephalogram signatures of loss and recovery of consciousness from propofol. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2013, 110, E1142–E1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rassi, E.; Wutz, A.; Müller-Voggel, N.; Weisz, N. Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2019, 116, 16862–16871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ray, T.S. Psychedelics and the human receptorome. PLoS One 2010, 5, e9019. [Google Scholar]
- Rebollo, I.; Devauchelle, A.D.; Béranger, B.; Tallon-Baudry, C. Stomach-brain synchrony reveals a novel, delayed-connectivity resting-state network in humans. eLife 2018, 7, e33321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reckweg, J.T.; Uthaug, M.V.; Szabo, A.; Davis, A.K.; Lancelotta, R.; Mason, N.L.; Ramaekers, J.G. The clinical pharmacology and potential therapeutic applications of 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT). Journal of Neurochemistry 2021, 162, 128–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reinhart, R.M.; Nguyen, J.A. Working memory revived in older adults by synchronizing rhythmic brain circuits. Nature Neuroscience 2019, 22, 820–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richter, C.G.; Babo-Rebelo, M.; Schwartz, D.; Tallon-Baudry, C. Phase-amplitude coupling at the organism level: The amplitude of spontaneous alpha rhythm fluctuations varies with the phase of the infra-slow gastric basal rhythm. NeuroImage 2017, 146, 951–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roseman, L.; Nutt, D.J.; Carhart-Harris, R.L. Quality of acute psychedelic experience predicts therapeutic efficacy of psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2018, 8, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ruffini, G.; Salvador, R.; Tadayon, E.; Sanchez-Todo, R.; Pascual-Leone, A.; Santarnecchi, E. Realistic modeling of mesoscopic ephaptic coupling in the human brain. PLOS Computational Biology 2020, 16, e1007923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schartner, M.M.; Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Barrett, A.B.; Seth, A.K.; Muthukumaraswamy, S.D. Increased spontaneous MEG signal diversity for psychoactive doses of ketamine, LSD and psilocybin. Scientific Reports 2017, 7, 46421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scheidegger, M.; Walter, M.; Lehmann, M.; Metzger, C.; Grimm, S.; Boeker, H.; Boesiger, P.; Henning, A.; Seifritz, E. Ketamine decreases resting state functional network connectivity in healthy subjects: Implications for antidepressant drug action. PLoS One 2016, 7, e44799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schiff, N.D.; Giacino, J.T.; Kalmar, K.; Victor, J.D.; Baker, K.; Gerber, M.; Fritz, B.; Eisenberg, B.; O’cOnnor, J.; Kobylarz, E.J.; et al. Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury. Nature 2007, 448, 600–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schiff, N.D.; Nauvel, T.; Victor, J.D. Large-scale brain dynamics in disorders of consciousness. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2014, 25, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schomburg, E.W.; Fernández-Ruiz, A.; Mizuseki, K.; Berényi, A.; Anastassiou, C.A.; Koch, C.; Buzsáki, G. Theta phase segregation of input-specific gamma patterns in entorhinal-hippocampal networks. Neuron 2014, 84, 470–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seth, A.K.; Bayne, T. Theories of consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2022, 23, 439–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, A.D.; Saxena, N.; Jackson, L.E.; Hall, J.E.; Singh, K.D.; Muthukumaraswamy, S.D. Ketamine amplifies induced gamma frequency oscillations in the human cerebral cortex. European Neuropsychopharmacology 2015, 25, 1136–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shen, H.W.; Jiang, X.L.; Winter, J.C.; Yu, A.M. Psychedelic 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine: Metabolism, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and pharmacological actions. Current Drug Metabolism 2010, 11, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siebenhühner, F.; Wang, S.H.; Arnulfo, G.; Nobili, L.; Palva, J.M.; Palva, S. Genuine cross-frequency coupling networks in human resting-state electrophysiological recordings. PLOS Biology 2020, 18, e3000685. [Google Scholar]
- Singer, W. Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron 1999, 24, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirota, A.; Montgomery, S.; Fujisawa, S.; Isomura, Y.; Zugaro, M.; Buzsáki, G. Entrainment of neocortical neurons and gamma oscillations by the hippocampal theta rhythm. Neuron 2008, 60, 683–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smigielski, L.; Kometer, M.; Scheidegger, M.; Krähenmann, R.; Huber, T.; Vollenweider, F.X. Characterization and prediction of acute and sustained response to psychedelic psilocybin in a mindfulness group retreat. Scientific Reports 2019, 9, 14914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snyder, A.Z.; Raichle, M.E. A brief history of the resting state: The Washington University perspective. NeuroImage 2012, 62, 902–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steriade, M. Synchronized activities of coupled oscillators in the cerebral cortex and thalamus at different levels of vigilance. Cerebral Cortex 1997, 7, 583–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterling, P.; Laughlin, S. (2015). Principles of neural design. MIT Press.
- Stevner, A.B.A.; Vidaurre, D.; Cabral, J.; Rapuano, K.; Nielsen, S.F.V.; Tagliazucchi, E.; Laufs, H.; Vuust, P.; Deco, G.; Woolrich, M.W.; et al. Discovery of key whole-brain transitions and dynamics during human wakefulness and non-REM sleep. Nature Communications 2017, 10, 1035. [Google Scholar]
- Studerus, E.; Gamma, A.; Vollenweider, F.X. Psychometric evaluation of the altered states of consciousness rating scale (OAV). PLoS One 2011, 5, e12412. [Google Scholar]
- Tagliazucchi, E.; Carhart-Harris, R.; Leech, R.; Nutt, D.; Chialvo, D.R. Enhanced repertoire of brain dynamical states during the psychedelic experience. Human Brain Mapping 2014, 35, 5442–5456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tegmark, M. Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Physical Review E 2000, 61, 4194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timmermann, C.; Roseman, L.; Schartner, M.; Milliere, R.; Williams, L.T.J.; Erritzoe, D.; Muthukumaraswamy, S.; Ashton, M.; Bendrioua, A.; Kaur, O.; et al. Neural correlates of the DMT experience assessed with multivariate EEG. Scientific Reports 2019, 9, 16324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timmermann, C.; Roseman, L.; Williams, L.; Erritzoe, D.; Martial, C.; Cassol, H.; Laureys, S.; Nutt, D.; Carhart-Harris, R. DMT models the near-death experience. Frontiers in Psychology 2018, 9, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tononi, G.; Cirelli, C. Sleep and the price of plasticity: From synaptic and cellular homeostasis to memory consolidation and integration. Neuron 2014, 81, 12–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tononi, G.; Boly, M.; Massimini, M.; Koch, C. Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2016, 17, 450–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tort, A.B.; Komorowski, R.; Eichenbaum, H.; Kopell, N. Measuring phase-amplitude coupling between neuronal oscillations of different frequencies. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 104, 1195–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urigüen, J.A.; Garcia-Zapirain, B. EEG artifact removal—state-of-the-art and guidelines. Journal of Neural Engineering 2015, 12, 031001. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Varela, F.; Lachaux, J.P.; Rodriguez, E.; Martinerie, J. The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2001, 2, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vázquez-Guardado, A.; Yang, Y.; Bandodkar, A.J.; Rogers, J.A. Recent advances in neurotechnologies with broad potential for neuroscience research. Nature Neuroscience 2020, 23, 1522–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vlisides, P.; Bel-Bahar, T.; Nelson, A.; Chilton, K.; Smith, E.; Janke, E.; Tarnal, V.; Picton, P.; Harris, R.; Mashour, G. Subanaesthetic ketamine and altered states of consciousness in humans. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2018, 121, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vollenweider, F.X.; Kometer, M. The neurobiology of psychedelic drugs: Implications for the treatment of mood disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2010, 11, 642–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vollenweider, F.X.; Preller, K.H. Psychedelic drugs: Neurobiology and potential for treatment of psychiatric disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2020, 21, 611–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voytek, B.; Kramer, M.A.; Case, J.; Lepage, K.Q.; Tempesta, Z.R.; Knight, R.T.; Gazzaley, A. Age-related changes in 1/f neural electrophysiological noise. Journal of Neuroscience 2015, 35, 13257–13265. [Google Scholar]
- Vyazovskiy, V.V.; Harris, K.D. Sleep and the single neuron: The role of global slow oscillations in individual cell rest. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2013, 14, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wacker, D.; Wang, S.; McCorvy, J.D.; Betz, R.M.; Venkatakrishnan, A.J.; Levit, A.; Lansu, K.; Schools, Z.L.; Che, T.; Nichols, D.E.; Shoichet, B.K. Crystal structure of an LSD-bound human serotonin receptor. Cell 2017, 168, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ward, L.M. Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7, 553–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watts, R.; Day, C.; Krzanowski, J.; Nutt, D.; Carhart-Harris, R. Patients' accounts of increased "connectedness" and "acceptance" after psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 2017, 57, 520–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber, E.T.; Andrade, R. Htr2a gene and 5-HT2A receptor expression in the cerebral cortex studied using genetically modified mice. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2010, 4, 36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Williams, J.; Ramaswamy, D.; Oulhaj, A. 10 Hz flicker improves recognition memory in older people. BMC Neuroscience 2013, 7, 21. [Google Scholar]
- Young, C.K.; Ruan, M.; McNaughton, N. The slowest shared resonance: A review of electromagnetic field oscillations between central and peripheral nervous systems. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2022, 15, 796455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zacharias, N.; Musso, F.; Müller, F.; Lammers, F.; Saleh, A.; London, M.; de Boer, P.; Winterer, G. Ketamine effects on default mode network activity and vigilance: A randomized, placebo-controlled crossover simultaneous fMRI/EEG study. Human Brain Mapping 2020, 41, 107–119. [Google Scholar]
- Zorumski, C.F.; Izumi, Y.; Mennerick, S. Ketamine: NMDA receptors and beyond. Journal of Neuroscience 2016, 36, 11158–11164. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).