Submitted:
25 August 2025
Posted:
27 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Introduction
The Nutritional Paradox of Wheat: Global Importance vs. Nutritional Limitations
Sprouting as a Natural Bioprocessing Solution
The Technological Bottleneck in Sprouted Grain Production
Beyond Conventional Drying: The Need for Gentle Dehydration
Objective and Novelty of the Study
- Integrated Closed System: The entire process from hydration to dry, stable product occurs within a single, sealed vessel, minimizing contamination risks and handling.
- In-situ Vacuum-Drying: The application of conductive contact drying under vacuum conditions allows for rapid and efficient moisture removal at significantly lower temperatures (<50°C) than hot-air drying, thereby preserving heat-sensitive nutrients.
- Mechanical Agitation: A novel intermittent agitation mechanism is introduced during the drying phase to prevent bed compaction, ensure uniform heat and mass transfer, and guarantee a consistent final moisture content throughout the batch.
Materials and Methods
Raw Material Preparation
Experimental Design
- Group 1 (Traditional Control): Grains were sprouted using a traditional Georgian method. Soaked grains were spread on trays, covered with moist cloths, and germinated at ambient temperature (≈20°C) for 48 hours with manual rinsing every 12 hours. The sprouted wheat was then sun-dried for 72 hours.
- Group 2 (Standard Lab Control): Grains were sprouted in a controlled climate chamber (Binder GmbH, Germany) at 20°C and 95% relative humidity for 48 hours. This group represents modern best-practice lab-scale sprouting (Keppler et al., 2018). The germinated wheat was dried in a convective hot-air oven (Memmert, Germany) at 60°C for 12 hours.
- Group 3 (Novel MFB Protocol): Grains were processed using the novel Multi-Function Bioreactor (MFB) system, integrating the entire protocol from disinfection to drying in-situ, as described in detail in Sections 2.3 and 2.4.
The Multi-Function Bioreactor (MFB) System
Vessel Design:
Agitation System:
Thermal Control System:
Vacuum System:
Automation & Control:
The Novel Protocol Cycle
- Loading: 25 kg of raw wheat was loaded into the vessel.
- Washing & Disinfection: The H₂O₂ disinfection protocol described in 2.1 was performed in-situ.
- Soaking: Grains were soaked in a 3:1 (w/v) water-to-grain ratio at 25°C for 12 hours. The helical agitator operated for 2 minutes every hour to ensure uniform hydration and prevent clumping.
- Water Drain: Soaking water was completely drained via a bottom outlet valve.
- Germination: The germination phase lasted 36 hours at 20°C. The jacket provided cooling to offset metabolic heat. The agitator ran for 1 minute every 4 hours to aerate the bed and prevent root matting, simulating the turning process used in malting (Briggs et al., 2004).
- In-Situ Vacuum-Contact Drying: Immediately after germination, drying was initiated without unloading the product. The jacket temperature was set to 50°C, and vacuum was applied to maintain a pressure of 70 mbar. The agitator ran continuously at 15 RPM to ensure uniform heat transfer and prevent compaction of the bed, which is crucial for efficient drying kinetics (Motevali et al., 2014). Drying continued until the moisture content reached below 10% (w.b.).
- Cooling & Unloading: The product was cooled to 25°C within the vessel under continuous agitation and vacuum before being discharged.
Analytical Methods
Nutritional Analysis:
Bioactivity Assessment:
Physico-Chemical Analysis:
Microbiological Safety:
Shelf-Life Study:
Statistical Analysis
Results
Process Efficiency and Parameters
Nutritional Enhancement
Antinutrient Reduction
Vitamin Synthesis
Mineral Bioavailability
Bioactivity Profile
Microbiological and Shelf-Stability Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
- Balkrishna, A., Sharma, V. K., Das, S. K., & Mishra, S. (2022). Role of sprouting in ameliorating the nutritional and antioxidant properties of wheat: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 59(3), 855–864. [CrossRef]
- Benítez, V., Cantera, S., Aguilera, Y., Mollá, E., Esteban, R. M., & Díaz, M. F. (2021). Impact of germination on starch, dietary fiber and physicochemical properties in non-conventional legumes. Food Research International, 143, 110275. [CrossRef]
- Briggs, D. E., Boulton, C. A., Brookes, P. A., & Stevens, R. (2004). Brewing: Science and Practice. Woodhead Publishing.
- Dutta, H., Mahanta, C. L., & Singh, A. (2022). Impact of drying on the nutritional and functional properties of food proteins. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 119, 57–71. [CrossRef]
- Gan, R. Y., Lui, W. Y., Wu, K., Chan, C. L., Dai, S. H., Sui, Z. Q., & Corke, H. (2017). Bioactive compounds and bioactivities of germinated edible seeds and sprouts: An updated review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 59, 1–14. [CrossRef]
- Gibson, R. S., Bailey, K. B., Gibbs, M., & Ferguson, E. L. (2010). A review of phytate, iron, zinc, and calcium concentrations in plant-based complementary foods used in low-income countries and implications for bioavailability. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 31(2_suppl2), S134-S146. [CrossRef]
- Gupta, R. K., Gangoliya, S. S., & Singh, N. K. (2015). Reduction of phytic acid and enhancement of bioavailable micronutrients in food grains. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52(2), 676–684. [CrossRef]
- Jaba, T. (2022). Dasatinib and quercetin: short-term simultaneous administration yields senolytic effect in humans. Issues and Developments in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 2, 22-31.
- Keppler, S., O’Meara, S., Bakalis, S., & Leadley, C. E. (2018). Evaluation of drying technologies for the retention of physical and chemical properties of sprouted wheat. Journal of Food Engineering, 234, 31–39. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S. S., & Chakkaravarthi, A. (2021). Efficacy of various chemical disinfectants on the microbial load and germination of wheat grains. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 58(5), 1947–1955. [CrossRef]
- Laca, A., Mousia, Z., Díaz, M., Webb, C., & Pandiella, S. S. (2006). Distribution of microbial contamination within cereal grains. Journal of Food Engineering, 72(4), 332–338. [CrossRef]
- Lemmens, E., Moroni, A. V., Pagand, J., Heirbaut, P., Ritala, A., Karlen, Y., ... & Delcour, J. A. (2019). Impact of cereal seed sprouting on its nutritional and technological properties: A critical review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 18(1), 305-328. [CrossRef]
- Li, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, X., Zhang, M., & Wang, J. (2021). Effect of germination on the nutritional and functional properties of wheat: A review. Grain & Oil Science and Technology, 4(3), 126-135. [CrossRef]
- Motevali, A., Koloor, R. T., & Khoshtaghaza, M. H. (2014). Comparison of energy parameters and specific energy in different drying methods of chamomile. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 16(4), 913-926.
- Méndez-Lagunas, L., Rodríguez-Ramírez, J., Cruz-Gracida, M., Sandoval-Torres, S., & Barriada-Bernal, G. (2017). Convective drying of wheat: Effect of temperature on nutritional and functional properties. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 54(5), 1221–1227. [CrossRef]
- Ndaw, S., Bergaentzle, M., Aoude-Werner, D., & Hasselmann, C. (2000). Extraction procedures for the liquid chromatographic determination of thiamin, riboflavin and vitamin B6 in foodstuffs. Food Chemistry, 71(1), 129–138. [CrossRef]
- Pal, R. S., Bhartiya, A., Yadav, P., Kant, L., Mishra, K. K., Aditya, J. P., & Pattanayak, A. (2016). Effect of dehulling, germination and cooking on nutrients, anti-nutrients, fatty acid composition and antioxidant properties in lentil (Lens culinaris). Journal of Food Science and Technology, 54(4), 909–920. [CrossRef]
- Prior, R. L., Wu, X., & Schaich, K. (2005). Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53(10), 4290–4302. [CrossRef]
- Shewry, P. R., & Hey, S. J. (2015). The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food and Energy Security, 4(3), 178-202. [CrossRef]
- Singh, A., Sharma, S., Singh, B., & Kaur, G. (2020). Engineering and technological aspects of cereal grain drying. In Engineering Practices for Agricultural Production and Water Conservation (pp. 255-278). CRC Press.
- Singh, A. K., Rehal, J., Kaur, A., & Jyot, G. (2015). Enhancement of attributes of cereals by germination and fermentation: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 55(11), 1575-1589. [CrossRef]
- Singleton, V. L., Orthofer, R., & Lamuela-Raventós, R. M. (1999). Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods in Enzymology, 299, 152–178. [CrossRef]
- Tapia, M. S., Alzamora, S. M., & Chirife, J. (2020). Effects of water activity (a_w) on microbial stability: As a hurdle in food preservation. In Water Activity in Foods: Fundamentals and Applications (pp. 323-355). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Taze, B. H., Unluturk, S., Buzrul, S., & Alpas, H. (2015). The impact of different disinfection methods on the microbial load of broccoli. Food Control, 50, 314–320. [CrossRef]
- Tkemaladze, J. (2023). Reduction, proliferation, and differentiation defects of stem cells over time: a consequence of selective accumulation of old centrioles in the stem cells?. Molecular Biology Reports, 50(3), 2751-2761.
- Tkemaladze, J. (2024). Editorial: Molecular mechanism of ageing and therapeutic advances through targeting glycative and oxidative stress. Front Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 6;14:1324446. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1324446. PMID: 38510429; PMCID: PMC10953819.
- Vashisth, D., Singh, R. K., & Pegg, R. B. (2011). Effects of drying on the phenolics content and antioxidant activity of muscadine pomace. *LWT - Food Science and Technology, 44*(7), 1649-1657. [CrossRef]



| Parameter | Group 1 (Traditional) | Group 2 (Lab Control) | Group 3 (Novel MFB) |
| Germination Rate (%) | 92.5 ± 3.2a | 98.8 ± 0.8b | 99.2 ± 0.5b |
| Total Process Time (h) | 150 | 90 | 60 |
| Drying Temperature (°C) | Ambient (20-30) | 60 | 50 |
| Final Moisture Content (% w.b.) | 11.5 ± 1.0a | 8.5 ± 0.5b | 7.8 ± 0.3b |
| Parameter | Raw Wheat | Group 1 (Traditional) | Group 2 (Lab Control) | Group 3 (Novel MFB) |
| TPC (mg GAE/100g) | 45.2 ± 2.1a | 68.5 ± 3.5b | 95.8 ± 4.1c | 120.3 ± 5.0d |
| DPPH (μmol TE/g) | 1.8 ± 0.1a | 3.0 ± 0.2b | 4.5 ± 0.3c | 6.2 ± 0.4d |
| ORAC (μmol TE/g) | 15.5 ± 1.0a | 25.8 ± 1.5b | 42.3 ± 2.0c | 58.9 ± 2.8d |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).