Submitted:
25 August 2025
Posted:
27 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between website traffic and financial performance among 50 leading e-commerce companies, with emphasis on differences between developed and developing economies. Using data from Semrush and CompaniesMarketCap.com, website visits (June 2025) and financial indicators (market capitalization, revenue, earnings, net margin, revenue per visit, and earnings per visit) were analyzed through Spearman’s rank-order correlations. Results indicate that in developed countries (n = 38), website traffic shows strong positive correlations with market capitalization, revenue, and earnings, suggesting a broad and consistent impact of digital engagement on financial outcomes. In contrast, in developing countries (n = 12), traffic correlates more strongly with earnings and net margin but not with revenue, implying selective conversion of digital engagement into profitability. These findings highlight that while traffic is universally important, its financial translation differs by market maturity. The study underscores the need for tailored digital strategies and improved infrastructure to optimize e-commerce performance across contexts.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Rationale
1.2. Problem Statement
1.3. Hypothesis
- H0 (Null): There is no significant correlation between website traffic and financial performance indicators (market cap, revenue, earnings, net margin, revenue per visit, and earnings per visit), controlling for country development.
- H1 (Alternative): There is a significant positive correlation between website traffic and financial performance indicators, controlling for country development.
- H0 (Null): The correlation between website traffic and financial performance does not differ between developed and developing countries.
- H1 (Alternative): The correlation between website traffic and financial performance differs significantly between developed and developing countries.
1.4. Conceptual Framework
2. Methodology
2.1. Data Collection
2.2. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Descriptive Statistics
3.2. Relationship Between Website Traffic and Financial Performance Indicators (Market Cap, Revenue, Earnings, Net Margin, Revenue Per Visit, and Earnings Per Visit), Controlling for Country Development
3.3. Correlation Differences Between Website Traffic and Financial Performance Among Developed and Developing Countries
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alawneh, A. (2018). Dividends, net income after taxes and earnings per share and their impact on the market capitalization of listed companies Amman Stock Exchange during the period 1978-2016. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 10(10), 69. [CrossRef]
- Ali, N. , & Shabn, O. S. (2024). Customer lifetime value (CLV) insights for strategic marketing success and its impact on organizational financial performance. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). [CrossRef]
- Amosh, H. A. , & Khatib, S. F. A. (2022). Websites visits and financial performance for GCC Banks: The moderating role of environmental, social and governance performance. Global Business Review. [CrossRef]
- Berger, P. D. , & Nasr, N. I. (2021). Customer lifetime value: Marketing models and applications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 12(1), 17–30. [CrossRef]
- Chen, C. P. T. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, S. L. (2020, June 25). Traffic analysis of e-commerce websites: Exploring the mediating effect of consumer behavior. International Journal of Organizational Innovation. Available online: https://www.ijoi-online.org/index.php/current-issue/522-traffic-analysis-of-e-commerce-websites-exploring-the-mediating-effect-of-consumer-behavior.
- Fernando, J. , Silberstein, S., & Rathburn, P. (2025). Market capitalization: What it means for investors. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketcapitalization.
- Filippou, G. , Georgiadis, A. G., & Jha, A. K. (2023). Establishing the link: Does web traffic from various marketing channels influence direct traffic source purchases? Marketing Letters, 35(1), 59–71. [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y. (2023). Study of the relationship between traffic and sales on e-commerce platforms based on QCA approach. Frontiers in Economics and Management, 4(3), 45–59. [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, A. , Gu, Z., & Jain, P. C. (2004). Sustained earnings and revenue growth, earnings quality, and earnings response coefficients. SSRN Electronic Journal. [CrossRef]
- Gunanto, A. , & Preda, L. (2023). Financial harmony in diversity: Exploring the dynamics of SMEs' finance through the lens of business size, debt-to-equity ratio, and revenue growth toward the perfection of net profit margin. SAR Journal - Science and Research. [CrossRef]
- Hendricks, S. , & Mwapwele, S. D. (2023). A systematic literature review on the factors influencing e-commerce adoption in developing countries. Data and Information Management, 8(1), 100045. [CrossRef]
- Howart, J. (2025). 79+ brand new e-commerce statistics for 2025. Exploding Topics. https://explodingtopics.
- Kanellos, N. , Karountzos, P., Giannakopoulos, N. T., Terzi, M. C., & Sakas, D. P. (2024). Digital marketing strategies and profitability in the agri-food industry: Resource efficiency and value chains. Sustainability, 16(14), 5889. [CrossRef]
- Kiel, D. , Müller, J. M., Arnold, C., & Voigt, K. (2017). Sustainable industrial value creation: Benefits and challenges of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(08), 1740015. [CrossRef]
- Kinda, T. (2019). E-commerce as a potential new engine for growth in Asia. IMF Working Paper, 19(135), 1. [CrossRef]
- Noor, L. S. , Deriawan, D., & Oktrivina, A. (2023). E-commerce and financial performance: Identification on trends, benefits and challenges. ATESTASI Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 6(1), 528–543. [CrossRef]
- Pomykalski, P. (2019). Revenue and valuation of companies with digital platform business models. Management Sciences, 24(1), 11–18. [CrossRef]
- Ramadhan, A. , & Nuraliati, A. (2020). The effect of net profit margin and earning per share on share prices. Almana: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 4(3), 420–430. [CrossRef]
- Rincón, J. S. R. R. , Tarazona, A. R. R. R., Martínez, A. M. M. M., & Acosta-Prado, J. C. (2022). Positioning and web traffic of Colombian banking establishments. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 17(4), 1473–1492. [CrossRef]
- Zhan, Y. (2024). E-commerce: The evolution of retail in the digital age [Opinion article]. Business Studies Journal, 16(2), 1–2. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/ecommerce-the-evolution-of-retail-in-the-digital-age-17343.

| Variables | Mean (Std.Dev.) | |
|---|---|---|
| Developed | Developing | |
| Website visits (Million) | 181.0 (440.0) | 26.6 (34.5) |
| Market cap. (Billion) | $125.0 ($406.0) | $53.9 ($91.6) |
| Revenue (Billion) | $55.9 ($155.0) | $34.5 (57.5) |
| Earnings | $4.11 ($13.9) | $12.1 ($25.5) |
| Net margin | –1.93% (30.60%) | 4,675.0% (16,191.0%) |
| Revenue per visit | $20,657 ($115,623) | $3,043 ($6,031) |
| Earnings per visit | $1,915 ($11,150) | $892 ($559) |
| Note: Std. Dev.=Standard Deviation, (Developed=38, Developing=12) | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Website visits | ρ | - | ||||||
| p-value | - | |||||||
| 2. Market Cap. | ρ | 0.634*** | - | |||||
| p-value | < .001 | - | ||||||
| 3. Revenue | ρ | 0.590*** | 0.850*** | - | ||||
| p-value | < .001 | < .001 | - | |||||
| 4. Earnings | ρ | 0.602*** | 0.731*** | 0.694*** | - | |||
| p-value | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | - | ||||
| 5. Net Margin | ρ | 0.574*** | 0.585*** | 0.480*** | 0.834*** | - | ||
| p-value | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | - | |||
| 6. Revenue/visit | ρ | -0.118 | 0.456*** | 0.662*** | 0.269 | 0.016 | - | |
| p-value | 0.420 | < .001 | < .001 | 0.062 | 0.912 | - | ||
| 7. Earnings/visit | ρ | 0.337*** | 0.631*** | 0.693*** | 0.878*** | 0.767*** | 0.472*** | - |
| p-value | 0.018 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | - | |
|
Note: Values are Spearman’s rho (ρ) partial correlations, controlling for country category. * p < .05 (Significant), ** p < .01 (High significance), *** p < .001 (Highly Significant). | ||||||||
| Variables | Developed Countries (n=38) | Developing Countries (n=12) | Observed Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website Visits ↔ Market Cap | ρ = 0.644, p < .001 | ρ = 0.622, p = .035 | Both significant positive; stronger significance in developed. |
| Website Visits ↔ Revenue | ρ = 0.622, p < .001 | ρ = 0.566, p = .059 (ns) | Strong & significant only in developed. |
| Website Visits ↔ Earnings | ρ = 0.573, p < .001 | ρ = 0.776, p = .005 | Stronger in developing; both are significant. |
| Website Visits ↔ Net Margin | ρ = 0.564, p < .001 | ρ = 0.657, p = .024 | Both positive & significant, slightly stronger in developing. |
| Website Visits ↔ Rev. per Visit | ρ = −0.164, p = .323 (ns) | ρ = 0.021, p = .956 (ns) | Both non-significant. |
| Website Visits ↔ Earn. per Visit | ρ = 0.313, p = .056 (ns) | ρ = 0.371, p = .237 (ns) | Both weak & non-significant. |
| Market Cap ↔ Revenue | ρ = 0.836, p < .001 | ρ = 0.874, p < .001 | Very strong in both, slightly higher in developing. |
| Market Cap ↔ Earnings | ρ = 0.762, p < .001 | ρ = 0.636, p = .030 | Strong in both, but weaker in developing. |
| Market Cap ↔ Net Margin | ρ = 0.612, p < .001 | ρ = 0.413, p = .184 (ns) | Significant only in developed. |
| Revenue ↔ Earnings | ρ = 0.690, p < .001 | ρ = 0.608, p = .040 | Both significant, slightly stronger in developed. |
| Revenue ↔ Net Margin | ρ = 0.432, p = .007 | ρ = 0.420, p = .177 (ns) | Significant only in developed. |
| Revenue ↔ Rev. per Visit | ρ = 0.596, p < .001 | ρ = 0.797, p = .003 | Both are significa nt, stronger in developing. |
| Earnings ↔ Net Margin | ρ = 0.812, p < .001 | ρ = 0.846, p < .001 | Very strong in both, slightly higher in developing. |
| Earnings ↔ Earn. per Visit | ρ = 0.888, p < .001 | ρ = 0.804, p = .003 | Very strong in both. |
| Net Margin ↔ Earn. per Visit | ρ = 0.715, p < .001 | ρ = 0.839, p = .001 | Strong in both, slightly higher in developing. |
| Note: Weak relationship: ρ = .10 – .29, Moderate relationship:ρ = .30 – .49, Strong relationship: ρ = .50 – .69, Very strong relationship: ρ ≥ .70. p < .05 (Significant), p < .01 (High significance), and p < .001 (Highly significant). (ns) not significant | |||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).