Submitted:
25 August 2025
Posted:
26 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- (i)
- irrigation using brackish or saline water, often characterized by moderate to high solute concentration;
- (ii)
- irrigation of soils containing naturally occurring fossil salts, especially in arid and semi-arid regions;
- (iii)
- deposition of salt-particles from marine aerosols;
- (iv)
- rising saline water tables, often associated with deforestation and poor drainage infrastructure.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Sites
2.2. Soil Chemical-Physical Analyses
- Sedimentation method was used to determine soil texture;
- Walkley-Black method was used for soil organic carbon (SOC) measurement.
- kjeldhal digestion method was used for determining Total Nitrogen levels;
- BaCl₂-MgSO₄ complexometric titration method using EDTA (Ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid) as titrant was used for measuring Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC);
- Soil pH was measured in a 1:2.5 soil-to-water suspension.
2.3. Data Elaboration
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ECe | Electrical conductivity by saturated Paste |
| EC1:5 | Electrical conductivity 1:5 water soil ratio |
| PTFs | Pedotransfer-function |
References
- Rhoades, J.D.; Kandiah, A.; Mashali, A.M. The Use of Saline Waters for Crop Production; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1992.
- Hoffman, G.J.; Shalhevet, J. Managing Irrigation Water Quality for Sustainable Agriculture. Springer Science & Business Media 2007. [CrossRef]
- Nawar, S.; Corstanje, R.; Halcro, G.; Mulla, D.; Waine, T. Delineation of Soil Management Zones for Variable Rate Irrigation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2014, 104, 27–38. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; Wang, N.; Wang, E.; Liu, S.; Yu, Q. Modelling the Impact of Climate Change on Rice Phenology and Grain Yield in China. Field Crops Research 2015, 175, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahid, S.A.; Zaman, M.; Heng, L. Soil Salinity: Historical Perspectives and a World Overview of the Problem. In Guideline for Salinity Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Using Nuclear and Related Techniques; Springer: Cham, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eswar, D.; Karuppusamy, R.; Chellamuthu, S. Drivers of Soil Salinity and Their Correlation with Climate Change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2021, 50, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okur, B.; Örçen, N. Soil Salinization and Climate Change. In Climate Change and Soil Interactions; Elsevier: 2020; pp. 331–350. ISBN 9780128180327.
- Poffenbarger, H.J.; Barker, D.W.; Helmers, M.J.; Miguez, F.E.; Olk, D.C.; Sawyer, J.E.; Six, J.; Castellano, M.J. Maximum Soil Organic Carbon Storage in Midwest U.S. Cropping Systems When Crops Are Optimally Nitrogen-Fertilized. PLoS ONE 2017, 12(3), e0172293. [CrossRef]
- Shahariar, S.; Farrell, R.; Soolanayakanahally, R.; Bedard-Haughn, A. Elevated Salinity and Water Table Drawdown Significantly Affect Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Soils from Contrasting Land-Use Practices in the Prairie Pothole Region. Biogeochemistry 2021, 155, 127–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivuskin, K.; Bartholomeus, H.; Bregt, A.K.; Pulatov, A.; Kempen, B.; de Sousa, L. Global Mapping of Soil Salinity Change. Remote Sensing of Environment 2019, 231, 111260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrivastava, P.; Kumar, R. Soil Salinity: A Serious Environmental Issue and Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria as One of the Tools for Its Alleviation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 22, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Momirović, N.; Kadović, R.; Perović, V.; Marjanović, M.; Baumgertel, A. Spatial Assessment of the Areas Sensitive to Degradation in the Rural Area of the Municipality Čukarica. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 2019, 7(1), 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohanavelu, A.; Naganna, S.R.; Al-Ansari, N. Irrigation Induced Salinity and Sodicity Hazards on Soil and Groundwater: An Overview of Its Causes, Impacts and Mitigation Strategies. Agriculture 2021, 11, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassani, A.; Azapagic, A.; Shokri, N. Global Predictions of Primary Soil Salinization Under Changing Climate in the 21st Century. Nature Communications 2021, 12, 6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tedeschi, A.; Schillaci, M.; Balestrini, R. Mitigating the Impact of Soil Salinity: Recent Developments and Future Strategies. Ital. J. Agron. 2023, 18, 2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A. Soil Salinity: A Global Threat to Sustainable Development. Soil Use and Management 2022, 38(1), 39–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Metternicht, G.; Zinck, J.A. Remote Sensing of Soil Salinity: Potentials and Constraints. Remote Sensing of Environment 2003.
- Yensen, N.P. Halophyte Uses for the Twenty-First Century. In Ecophysiology of High Salinity Tolerant Plants; 2006; pp. 367–396.
- Mandal, S.; Singh, R.D.; Patra, A.K.; Dwivedi, B.S. Changes in Soil Quality in Response to Short-Term Application of Municipal Sewage Sludge in a Typic Haplustept Under Cowpea-Wheat Cropping System. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management 2015, 4, 37–41. [Google Scholar]
- Haj-Amor, Z.; Ibrahimi, M.K.; Feki, N.; Lhomme, J.P.; Bouri, S. Soil Salinisation and Irrigation Management of Date Palms in a Saharan Environment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2016, 188, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saleh, A.M.; Abd-Elwahed, M.; Metwally, Y.; Arafat, S. Capabilities of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data to Detect Soil Salinity. Arab Univ. J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hopmans, J.W.; Qureshi, A.S.; Kisekka, I.; Munns, R.; Grattan, S.R.; Rengasamy, P.; Ben-Gal, A.; Assouline, S.; Javaux, M.; Minhas, P.S.; Raats, P.A.C.; Skaggs, T.H.; Wang, G.; De Jong van Lier, Q.; Jiao, H.; Lavado, R.S.; Lazarovitch, N.; Li, B.; Taleisnik, E. Chapter One—Critical Knowledge Gaps and Research Priorities in Global Soil Salinity. In Advances in Agronomy; Sparks, D.L., Ed.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; Volume 169. [Google Scholar]
- Qadir, M.; Quillérou, E.; Nangia, V.; Murtaza, G.; Singh, M.; Thomas, R.J.; Drechsel, P.; Noble, A.D. Economics of Salt-Induced Land Degradation and Restoration. Natural Resources Forum 2014, 38(4), 282–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomaz, A.; Palma, P.; Alvarenga, P.; Gonçalves, M.C. Soil Salinity Risk in a Climate Change Scenario and Its Effect on Crop Yield. In Climate Change and Soil Interactions; Prasad, M.N.V., Pietrzykowski, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 351–396. ISBN 9780128180327. [Google Scholar]
- Glick, B.R.; Todorovic, B.; Czarny, J.; Cheng, Z.; Duan, J.; McConkey, B. Promotion of Plant Growth by Bacterial ACC Deaminase. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 2007, 26(5–6), 227–242. [CrossRef]
- Rhoades, J.D. (1982). Soluble salts. In: Page, A.L. et al. (eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agronomy Monograph No. 9 (2nd ed.), ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 167–179.
- Liu-Khorsandi, F.; Yazdi, F.A. Estimation of Saturated Paste Extracts’ Electrical Conductivity from 1:5 Soil/Water Suspension and Gypsum. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2011, 42(3), 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. Rapport de synthèse par pays. Tunisie, 30 Mai 2024. https://www.fao.org/giews/countrybrief/country.jsp?code=TUN.
- Brahim, N.; Ibrahim, H.; Jaouadi, J.; Bol, R. Impact of Secondary Salinization in Alluvial Soils on Organic Carbon Stock: A Case of the Lower Medjerda Valley in Northern Tunisia. In Recent Research on Environmental Earth Sciences, Geomorphology, Soil Science, Paleoclimate, and Karst, MedGU 2021. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation, Springer: Cham, 2023. [CrossRef]
- Shrivastava, P.; Kumar, R. Soil Salinity: A Serious Environmental Issue and Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria as One of the Tools for Its Alleviation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 2014, 22, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brahim, N.; Bernoux, M.; Gallali, T. Pedotransfer Functions to Estimate Soil Bulk Density for Northern Africa: Tunisia Case. Journal of Arid Environments 2012, 81, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smaali, H. Une alternative cartographique pour l’évaluation des performances de la gestion collective de l’irrigation : le cas des GDA du gouvernorat de la Manouba (Nord-Est de la Tunisie). Geo-Eco-Trop. 2021, 4(45), 681–698. https://www.geoecotrop.be/uploads/publications/pub_454_13.pdf.
- Commissariat Régional au Développement Agricole (CRDA) de la Manouba. Rapport annuel de l’activité du CRDA pour l’année 2019. 2020, 114 p.
- Calzolari, C.; Ungaro, F. Analisi e valutazione dei dati di salinità in relazione al metodo di misura di laboratorio e di campagna e alla definizione di funzioni di trasferimento per la stima della densità apparente dei suoli a tessitura grossolana. Rapporto 1.3, CNR IRPI, Unità Operativa di Sesto Fiorentino - Pedologia Applicata, 2011.
- Kargas, G.; Chatzigiakoumis, I.; Kollias, A.; Spiliotis, D.; Massas, I.; Kerkides, P. Title: Soil Salinity Assessment Using Saturated Paste and Mass Soil:Water 1:1 and 1:5 Ratios Extracts Journal: Water 2018, 10(11), 1589.
- Ahmed, A.; Yamamoto, T.; Bakheit, C.; Cookson, P. Soil Salinity Assessment by Some Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods in Calcareous Soils. Journal of the Japanese Society of Soil Physics 2006, 104, 27–40. [Google Scholar]
- Contreras, C.P.; Bonilla, C.A. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Pedotransfer Functions for Predicting Soil Water Content in Environmental Modeling and Ecosystem Management. Science of the Total Environment 2018, 644, 1580–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srimani, P.K.; Koti, M.S. Application of Data Mining Techniques for Outlier Mining in Medical Databases. Int. J. Curr. Res. 2011, 3(6), 402–407. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, M.; Yonghua, L.; Xiaoyong, L. Digital Mapping and Scenario Prediction of Soil Salinity in Coastal Lands Based on Multi-Source Data Combined with Machine Learning Algorithms. Remote Sensing 2024. [CrossRef]
- Zounemat-Kermani, M.; Scholz, M. Modeling of Dissolved Oxygen Applying Stepwise Regression and a Template-Based Fuzzy Logic System. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2014, 140, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zounemat-Kermani, M.; Ramezani-Charmahineh, A.; Razavi, R.; et al. Machine Learning and Water Economy: A New Approach to Predicting Dams Water Sales Revenue. Water Resources Management 2020, 34, 1893–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boudibi, S.; Sakaa, B.; Benguega, Z.; et al. Spatial Prediction and Modeling of Soil Salinity Using Simple Cokriging, Artificial Neural Networks, and Support Vector Machines in El Outaya Plain, Biskra, Southeastern Algeria. Acta Geochimica 2021, 40, 390–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beniaich, A.; Otten, W.; Shin, H.-C.; Cooper, H.V.; Rickson, J.; Soulaimani, A.; El Gharous, M. Evaluation of Pedotransfer Functions to Estimate Some Soil Hydraulic Characteristics in North Africa: A Case Study from Morocco. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2023, 11, 1090688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Chen, S.; Hu, B.; Ji, W.; Li, S.; Hong, Y.; Xu, H.; Wang, N.; Xue, J.; Zhang, X.; et al. Global Soil Salinity Prediction by Open Soil Vis-NIR Spectral Library. Remote Sens. 2022, 14(21), 5627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Ye, T.; Jägermeyr, J.; Müller, C.; Chen, S.; Liu, X.; Shi, P. Future Climate Change Significantly Alters Interannual Wheat Yield Variability Over Half of Harvested Areas. Environmental Research Letters 2021, 16(9), 094045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelfattah, M.A.; Shahid, S.A. A Comparative Characterization and Classification of Soils in Abu Dhabi Coastal Area in Relation to Arid and Semi-Arid Conditions Using USDA and FAO Soil Classification Systems. Arid Land Research and Management 2007, 21(3), 245–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, W.; Songchao, C.; Lu, R.; Xianglin, Z.; Yuxin, M.; Zhou, S. Non-Linear Memory-Based Learning for Predicting Soil Properties Using a Regional Vis-NIR Spectral Library. Geoderma 2024. [CrossRef]
- Qadir, M.; Oster, J.D.; Schubert, S.; Noble, A.D.; Sahrawat, K.L. Phytoremediation of Sodic and Saline-Sodic Soils. Advances in Agronomy 2007, 96, 197–247. [Google Scholar]



| Soil Parameters | Unit | Mean | SD* | Min | Max | Range | Skewness | Kurtosis | CV%* |
| EC 1:5 * | dS m−1 | 1.38 | 2.97 | 0.13 | 16.31 | 16.18 | 16.17 | 3.88 | 215.94 |
| ECe* | dS m-1 | 2.59 | 2.87 | 0.35 | 16.31 | 15.96 | 12.25 | 3.18 | 110.46 |
| pH* | --- | 7.39 | 0.33 | 6.44 | 8.04 | 1.60 | 0.78 | -0.32 | 4.46 |
| CaCO3* | % | 25.57 | 14.26 | 0.85 | 47.86 | 47.01 | -1.39 | -0.18 | 8.23 |
| SOC* | % | 33.53 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 2.86 | 2.86 | -0.46 | 0.21 | 2.18 |
| Nt* | % | 1.17 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.19 | -0.10 | 0.73 | 4.25 |
| CEC* | Cmol (+) Kg-1 | 0.11 | 9.43 | 1.88 | 50.00 | 48.12 | 0.85 | -0.10 | 38.58 |
| Clay* | % | 38.91 | 14.21 | 7.25 | 65.00 | 57.75 | -0.14 | -0.64 | 5.41 |
| Silt* | % | 27.07 | 9.20 | 8.35 | 45.00 | 36.65 | -0.59 | -0.04 | 5.02 |
| Sand* | % | 33.53 | 18.88 | 6.55 | 75.50 | 68.95 | -0.28 | 0.62 | 5.63 |
| Models/PTFs | Soil covariates | Equations | R2 value |
| [35] model | EC 1:5 | ECe = 6.53 × EC 1:5-0.108 |
0.87 |
| [36] model | EC 1:5 | ECe= 9.70× EC 1:5 | 0.87 |
| PTFs (1) Multiple linear regression |
EC 1:5 – pH CEC – Clay CaCO3 – SOC TN |
ECe=8.58+ (0.90) × EC1:5 +(0.0047) × CEC + (-0.916) × pH+ (-0.002) ×Clay +(0.020) ×CaCO3+ (0.14) ×SOC +(-1.10) ×TN |
0.85 |
| PTFs (2) Stepwise linear regression |
EC 1:5 – pH | ECe= 7.63+ (0.83) × EC1:5 + (-0.85) ×pH | 0.71 |
| PTFs (3) Multiple linear regression |
EC 1:5 – pH CEC – Clay-Silt-Sand CaCO3 – SOC TN |
ECe= -0.34+(0.86) × EC1:5 +(0.003) ×CEC + (-0.96) ×pH +(-0.019) ×CaCO3 +(0.089) ×Clay + (0.098) × Silt + (0.091) × Sand + (0.07) ×SOC + (-0.70) ×TN |
0.84 |
| PTFs (4) Lasso & Ridge regression |
EC 1:5 – pH CEC – Clay CaCO3 – SOC TN |
ECe= 15.39+(0.76) × EC1:5 +(0.002) × CEC +(-1.58) ×pH +(-0.04) × CaCO3 + (-0.04) × Clay + (-0.23) × SOC +(2.62) × TN |
0.89 |
| PTFs (5) Multiple linear regression |
EC 1:5 - pH CEC-SOC TN |
ECe= 1.226+(0.905) × EC1 :5 +(-0.005) × CEC + (0.220) × SOC + (-0.105) × TN |
0.83 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).