Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Prevalence, Motivations, Lifestyle Preferences, and Basic Health Behavior Among 1350 Vegan, Vegetarian, and Omnivorous Austrian School Teachers and Principals

Submitted:

21 July 2025

Posted:

22 July 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background/Objectives: Few European and Austrian adults live a healthy lifestyle. As critical role models, school teachers and principals are highly influential for delivering basic health education to children and adolescents. This investigation aimed to analyze the underlying motivations and lifestyle preferences for diet type adherence among school teachers and principals and the associations with basic health behavior. Methods: The present study followed a cross-sectional design. School teachers and principals in Austria fill out an online questionnaire, with questions on anthropometrics, physical activity levels, dietary behavior, and alcohol and smoking consumption. Statistical analysis was conducted with ANOVA and chi-squared tests. Results: Prevalence of vegan, vegetarian and omnivorous diet of school teachers/principals was 2.3%, 5.2%, and 92.5%, respectively. Females were more likely vegetarian (6.4% vs. 2.4%; p<0.01) or vegan/vegetarian (pooled 9.0% vs. 4.1%) dieters than males. Health (46.4%) was the most important reason for dietary choice and sports engagement, and lifestyle (pooled 81.7%) the predominant lifestyle preference across all dietary subgroups. Vegetable intake was significantly higher among vegetarians and vegans than in omnivores (92.9% vs. 93.5% vs. 70.5%, respectively; p<0.01). Conclusions: This is the first study to investigate the potential differences in basic health behavior among refined dietary subgroups (omnivorous, vegetarian, and vegan) in school teachers and principals. The findings indicate that basic diet type differentiation is the first step towards fundamentally healthy behavior, however, further action must be taken to achieve better health among school teachers and principals in Austria (more physical activity, sports & exercise, and fruit and vegetable consumption, less alcohol intake and no smoking).
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

At the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris, for the first time in history, over 60% of the food (33% in the Athletes' Village restaurant, 50% for staff, 60% of the snacks on offer to the public) was plant-predominant, including vegan options [1,2,3]. Overall, the 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games aimed to reduce the carbon footprint by 50% and cater for the many vegan-vegetarian Olympic athletes and spectators [1,2,3]. The Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) followed the example of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and hosted the European Football Championships 2024 in Germany as an event with ‘driving force for the sustainable development of German and European society’ in terms of environmental protection and sustainability by incorporating a vegan-vegetarian food offering for players and fans in every stadium as an important measure [4,5,6,7].
Considerable evidence supports the shift in populations towards healthful plant-predominant diets, which reduces or eliminates the intake of animal-originated products while maximizing advantageous impacts on human, environmental, and planetary health [8]. The production of animal-based foods takes up 83% of all arable land worldwide but provides only 18% of all calories consumed worldwide (ratio 1:4 at the expense of animal products) [9]. Avoiding meat and dairy products can therefore make the greatest contribution to resource conservation and reduce the CO2 footprint of food (75 % less greenhouse gas emissions, 75 % less land consumption, 54 % less water consumption, 73 % less water pollution, 66 % less biodiversity loss, and more) [9,10,11]. According to researchers of the Oxford University and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), dietary behavior is ‘probably the single biggest way to reduce your impact on planet Earth (i.e., not only greenhouse gas emissions but also global acidification, eutrophication, land, water use, and more [12]. Poore & Nemecek (2018) emphasize that switching to a plant-predominant diet holds the greatest potential for protecting individual and global health and promoting human sustainability at all socio-ecological levels [9], including the containment of infectious diseases, epidemics and pandemics, NCDs, and the depletion of resources, especially global resources, along with other health measures [13,14].
The determinants of health indicate that social circumstances, environmental pollutants, genetics, the healthcare system, and personal behavior are the major contributors to health outcomes [15,16]. Likewise, personal behavior is known to make the largest contribution with at least 40% influence over health [15,16]. Thus, the WHO has provided the leading modifiable, behavioral risk factors contributing to NCD development: tobacco and alcohol use, unhealthy diet, and insufficient PA [17]. Recent findings have found that few European adults (5.8%) follow a healthy lifestyle (from four modifiable behaviors: PA, fruit and vegetable consumption, not drinking alcohol to excess, and not smoking) and even fewer Austrian adults (2.8%) [18]. In contrast, however, over 92% of annual deaths in Austria (vs. 75% globally) are caused by underlying NCDs, which are also dominantly responsible for the leading causes of years lived with disability (e.g., 34.7% cardiovascular disease, 23.5% cancer) [19,20,21,22], with half of the global adult population is projected to be obese by 2035 [23].
Consistent with physical activity (PA) and exercise levels [17,24,25], food and dietary decisions can make a definitive difference by the immune system response and prevention, considering the risk of moderate-to-severe disease progression and premature death [8,26,27,28,29,30]. However, well-planned and diligently implemented vegan and vegetarian diets are considered most beneficial to human health [31]. Vegans are generally more health-conscious (regular PA, no or less alcohol and nicotine consumption) than vegetarians and mixed dieters. This results in the fact that, on average, vegans in particular are healthier (corresponding parameters are more often within the normal range, e.g. blood pressure, blood levels of lipids, glucose, cholesterol, etc.), have the lowest body weight and BMI, are also less likely to develop overweight and obesity, and are less likely to suffer from NCDs and chronic diseases than mixed dieters and vegetarians [31: pp. 97-115, 126, 279, 362-408]. The link between behavior and health is well established, also as health is linked to one´s educational and academic level [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Thus, education plays an essential role in contributing to an individual`s health, interests and knowledge, and consciousness resulting in a specific health behavior (health-promoting or health-threating). Over the life-course, those with a good education were shown to have advantages in terms of their health and greater lifespan, are more likely to achieve a higher socio-economic status, have a stronger influence on social issues, higher income later on, better protected against unemployment, and participate effectively in socio-political public agenda politics [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Thus, regardless of socio-economic background, school as a health-promoting living environment for all protagonists alike, i. e. pupils, teachers and principals, provides a particularly suitable setting for the development of healthy behavior [42,43,44].
School teachers and principals are highly influential role models for delivering health knowledge and competencies through health education to children and adolescents regardless of directly teaching health subjects [45,46,47,48,49]. The basic health behavior that teachers and principals exemplify is naturally and seamlessly impressed on school pupils, as the school environment is vastly distinguishable from the home environment, with the opportunity of respected adults of the community leading the growth of children rather than the parents [45,50,51]. Health promotion as a healthy lifestyle, especially PA, sports & exercise paired with a healthy diet, is included in the state mandate (Austrian curriculum) for primary and secondary schools as a cross-curricular educational goal [52]. Currently, limited research has been carried out on teacher [53,54] and principal health [51,55], mostly concerning mental health or stress management in the school environment. Therefore, a gap in the literature exists on the relationship between PA, sports & exercise and diet types (especially vegan and vegetarian) in schools.
Previous studies have examined the lifestyle of teacher health behavior without explicitly analyzing diet types [53,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68]. Likewise, the individual perceived level of healthy lifestyle was previously self-reported by the teachers themselves [53]. Additionally, the importance of the PA levels with diet type (Healthy Eating & Active Living: HEAL) was previously suggested although no further examination of teacher behavior was carried out [56,57,59,60,61,62,63]. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous study has investigated diet type in connection with PA levels among a sample of Austrian adults working in the school setting. Therefore, From Science 2 School is the first study to investigate schoolteachers and staff following vegan and vegetarian diets in connection with PA, sports, and exercise. The present study aimed to analyze the prevalence and motivations of teachers and principals at secondary schools levels I and II following distinct diet types in connection with basic health behavior. It was hypothesized that Austrian secondary school teachers and principals following vegan and vegetarian diets have advanced health behavior.

2. Materials and Methods

The study From Science 2 School was conducted with a cross-sectional design and included an interdisciplinary approach. The Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science, and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung) approved this nationwide study (Department 1/7—School and University Sports). The study protocol was approved by the ethical committees of the Federal Education Authorities in Austria (Burgenland, Carinthia, Lower Austria, Salzburg, Styria, Tyrol, Upper Austria, Vienna, and Vorarlberg); interested readers are kindly referred to the official website and previous publications.

2.1. Procedure and Measures

The questionnaire was standardized and available for secondary school teachers and principals (middle school and high school levels) in Austria online through an server-certificate encrypted website (SSL; LimeSurvey: 03.17.16; see: https://www.science2.school/en/#Questionnaire), and all study participation was anonymized. Before the teachers and principals volunteered to participate in the study, written informed consent was acquired with the disclosure of detailed information on the study procedure. Study participation may have been ceased at any time without repercussion. The questionnaire consisted of five sections: personal information (Part 1), PA and exercise (Part 2), dietary habits (Part 3), general health (Part 4), and other related aspects (Part 5). Throughout the survey, control questions were incorporated to identify incoherent responses and possible conflicts to benefit the reliability of the dataset.
The questionnaire was distributed across Austria (nationwide) and acquired sociodemographic data on age, sex, teaching level (middle and/or high school), living environment (urban or rural rural), employment status (full time or part time), anthropometrics (height, weight, and calculated BMI (kg/m2)) and kind of diet (vegan, vegetarian, omnivorous). In addition, data was collected on (i) lifestyle interests (alcohol, smoking, engagement in PA, sports & exercise, dietary preferences (eating meat, vegetarian-kind), lifestyle preferences (sport/exercise, vegan/vegetarian lifestyle, other), (ii) dietary motivation (animal/environmental protection, heath, sport performance, tradition, taste/preference, no and/or other reason), (iii) dietary behavior (fruit and vegetable intake, level of fluids consumed, and most common fluids), (iv) PA and exercise participation (leisure time activity, fitness club activity, days per week), (v) alcohol consumption, and (vi) smoking habits. Considering the reported dietary intake with the initial self-reported diet type, school teachers and principals were shifted to the corresponding dietary subgroups: omnivorous diet (intake of meat and other foods from animal sources, but also plant foods), vegetarian diet (no intake of red/white meats or fish/seafood; intake of eggs, dairy products, and honey), or vegan diet (no intake of foods or products from animal origin, 100% plant-predominant diet) [69,70].

2.2. Participants

The potential sample size included all teachers and principals (N = 89,243) of secondary (middle & high) schools nationwide in Austria. All secondary schools (N = 2,688) were invited to participate in the online survey by contacting the school principals by e-mail and asked to distribute and fill-in the survey (available in German) with a web-enabled device (e.g., via computer, smartphone, tablet). The final sample included responses from 1,350 teachers and principals (1.5% of the eligible sample) at data closure (July 10, 2020). Figure 1 depicts the teachers´ and principals´ study enrollment.

2.3. Data Clearance

After checking responses to various dietary control questions, the reported food consumed did not match the reported kind of diet in a total of 52 (3.9%) participants. Specifically, 2 vegan (3.8%) and 43 vegetarian (82.7%) participants were shifted to the omnivorous dietary subgroup. Further, 2 participants reporting a vegan diet (3.8%) were shifted to vegetarian while 5 participants reported eating vegetarian (9.6%) were shifted to vegan dietary subgroups. No participants reported implausible anthropometrics (such as a body weight < 20 kg, a height < 110 cm, or a BMI < 10 kg/m2 or > 50 kg/m2).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Prevalence and mean with standard deviation (SD) were used for the descriptive statistics. ANOVA and Bonferroni adjustment for post-hoc analyses were used to analyze differences in anthropometric characteristics between dietary subgroups. Associations between dietary subgroups and ordinal or nominal scaled data were examined with Kruskal-Wallis and chi square tests. Subgroup analyses were conducted for the total sample and sex, teaching level (middle school, high-school, middle & high school pooled), living environment (urban or rural) and employment status (full-time or part-time). SPSS 29.0 (SPSS Inc., IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA) was used to perform all statistical tests. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.01.

3. Results

A total of 1,350 secondary school teachers and principals were included in the present study. Most participants followed an omnivorous diet (92.5%; n = 1,249), while 70 (5.2%) and 31 (2.3%) participants followed a vegetarian and vegan diet, respectively. The majority of the omnivorous teachers and principals (91.1%; n = 1,138) reported that this has been their kind of diet for their entire life, while 5.7% (n = 4) reported that they have always consumed a vegetarian diet. Within the previous 5 years, 36.6% of vegetarian dieters and 64.5% of vegan dieters switched to their current diet from previously consuming an omnivorous diet.
Table 1 displays the distribution of participants across dietary subgroups based on the reported foods, which was used for subsequent analyses. Across the total sample, vegan participants were youngest with a mean age of 43.6 ± 10.5 years. Significantly more males reported an omnivorous diet (95.8%; n = 392), while the prevalence of vegetarian and vegan diet was higher in female participants (6.4%; n = 60; p<0.01). In addition, mean body weight was significantly higher in omnivores (71.6 kg) than in vegetarians (66.5 kg; p<0.01, while there were no significant differences across dietary subgroups for BMI.

3.1. Dietary Motives and Lifestyle Preferences

Health was the primary motive for the selection of any diet type. Almost half (48.4%; n = 15) of participants with a vegan diet reported health as the primary motive for their diet, followed by those with an omnivorous diet (46.9%; n = 586) and vegetarians (37.1%; n = 26). Animal welfare was the second most commonly mentioned motive among participants with a vegetarian (40.0%; n = 28) and vegan diet (29.0%; n = 9). Among those with an omnivorous diet, taste was the second most commonly mentioned primary motive (23.8%; n = 297) followed by tradition (10.2%; n = 127). Among vegetarians, taste was the third most commonly mentioned primary motive for their dietary choices (10.0%; n = 7), while environmental protection was the third most commonly mentioned motive (12.9%; n = 4) among those with a vegan diet. Food intolerances were reported by 14.0% (n = 189) of the participants.
Across the total sample, 70.7% (n = 954) of the participants considered engagement in exercise as a meaningful or cool lifestyle, and an additional 10.9% (n = 147) mentioned a lifestyle of a specific sports activity. A vegan diet and lifestyle were considered meaningful or cool by 7.4% (n = 100) and 2.4% (n = 32), respectively. While PA, sports & exercise remained the most commonly mentioned meaningful or cool lifestyle among those with a vegan diet (41.9%; n = 13), vegetarians reported their dietary choice most commonly as a meaningful lifestyle (51.4%; n = 36). A vegan diet was mentioned as a meaningful or cool lifestyle among 35.5% (n = 11) of participants with a vegan diet. Meat (4.5%; n = 56) and alcohol consumption (1.8%; n = 22) as a lifestyle were only mentioned among those consuming an omnivorous diet. Those with an omnivorous diet also mentioned the vegetarian diet (5%; n = 62) or vegetarian lifestyle (2.2%; n = 27) as a meaningful or cool lifestyle.
Table 2 displays an overview of dietary motives and lifestyle preferences of secondary school teachers and principals across subgroups, while full detail of dietary motives and lifestyle preferences for by diet type for sex, school level, residence and employment status are presented at Appendix Tables A1 and A2.

3.2. Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Among the total sample, 62.4% (n = 842) of the participants reported daily fruit consumption and 72.2% (n = 975) reported daily vegetable consumption. There was no difference in the prevalence of daily fruit consumption across dietary subgroups. The prevalence of daily vegetable consumption was significantly lower in omnivores (70.5%; n = 881) compared to vegetarians (92.9%; n = 65) and vegans (93.5%; n = 29; p<0.01), while daily vegetable consumption did not differ between those reporting a vegan or vegetarian diet (Figure 2).
Male participants reported significantly less daily fruit and vegetable intake than females (p<0.01). Further, part time teachers reported a higher prevalence of daily fruit and vegetable intake than their peer at fulltime employment (p<0.01). Subgroup analyses further showed a higher prevalence of daily vegetable consumption in those with a vegan and vegetarian diet among full time teachers as well as secondary level I and II school teachers/principals (but at pooled subgroup). No difference was observed in the sex-specific prevalence of daily vegetable consumption across dietary patterns. Moreover, there was no difference in the prevalence of daily fruit consumption across kinds of diet in any subgroup. Table 3 shows the prevalence of daily fruit and vegetable consumption by dietary subgroups.

3.3. Fluids, Alcohol, and Nicotine Consumption

Across the total sample 10.6% (n = 143) and 16.4% (n = 221) reported a fluid intake above 2.5 L/day and 2.0 L/day, respectively. There was no difference in level of fluid intake across dietary subgroups. Among the entire sample 76.1% (n = 1,027) of secondary school teachers/principals reported water as the most common drink, followed by tea (9.9%; n = 134), coffee (4.7%; n = 63) and fruit juices (4.4%; n = 59). Participants with a vegetarian diet only reported water (84.3%; n = 59) or tea (15.7%; n = 11) as their most preferred drink, and coffee was only the most preferred drink among participants with an omnivorous diet (5%; n = 62) (Figure 3).
Out of all secondary teachers and principals, 81.5% (n = 1,100) reported alcohol consumption and 11.0% (n = 149) smoked. Alcohol consumption and smoking prevalence did not differ significantly across dietary subgroups (Figure 4, Table 4).

3.4. PA, Sports & Exercise Participation

Participation in leisure time PA, sports & exercise was reported by 88.7% (n = 1,197) of secondary school teachers/principals and 29.2% (n = 394) of them were members in sports clubs. Compared to part-time employees full time employment was associated with higher leisure time PA (89.8% vs. 84.9%; p=0.02) and club sports participation (30.8% vs. 23.5%; p=0.01). There was no difference in leisure time PA by sex, living environment and employment status. Club sports participation, however, was significantly higher in male participants compared to female participants (39.1% vs. 24.9%, p<0.01) as well as participants living in a rural environment compared to their peers living in an urban environment (31.4% vs. 25.5%, p=0.02).
Across the entire sample there were no differences in leisure time PA and exercise or club sports participation across dietary subgroups, and – although vegans on average with 3.3 days/week were most active on a weekly basis (vs. 3.1 days/week in vegetarians and 2.9 days/week in omnivorous; Figure 5) the frequency of PA and exercise also did not differ by diet type. Similar results were observed in subgroup analyses, except for male participants regarding leisure time PA. In men, leisure time PA declined from those with an omnivorous diet to those with a vegan diet (p<0.01) while no difference in club sports participation was observed.
Figure 5. PA, sports & exercise participation (days/week) by diet type (n=1,197). Note. Values are displayed as median and interquartile ranges, including means (x).
Figure 5. PA, sports & exercise participation (days/week) by diet type (n=1,197). Note. Values are displayed as median and interquartile ranges, including means (x).
Preprints 169072 g005
Table 5. Prevalence (%) of PA, sports & exercise engagement by dietary subgroups.
Table 5. Prevalence (%) of PA, sports & exercise engagement by dietary subgroups.

TOTAL (N=1,350)
Leisure Time Sports
88.7% (n=1,197)
Club Sports
29.2% (n=394)
Vegan Vegetarian Omnivorous Vegan Vegetarian Omnivorous
83.9%
(n=26)
88.6%
(n=62)
88.9%
(n=1,110)
29.0%
(n=9)
22.9%
(n=16)
29.5%
(n=369)
Sex
Male 57.1 (n=4) 80.0 (n=8) 91.8 (n=360) 28.6 (n=2) 30.0 (n=3) 39.5 (n=155)
Female 91.7 (n=22) 90.0 (n=54) 87.5 (n=750) 29.2 (n=7) 21.7 (n=13) 25.0 (n=214)
Teaching Level
Middle School 90.0 (n=9) 86.7 (n=26) 89.7 (n=373) 40.0 (n=4) 20.0 (n=6) 31.0 (n=129)
High School 76.9 (n=10) 85.2 (n=23) 88.6 (n=523) 15.4 (n=2) 25.9 (n=7) 26.8 (n=158)
Middle & High
School Pooled
87.5 (n=7) 100 (n=13) 88.1 (n=214) 37.5 (n=3) 23.1 (n=3) 33.7 (n=82)
Residence
Urban 82.4 (n=14) 88.2 (n=30) 89.1 (n=408) 23.5 (n=4) 23.5 (n=8) 25.8 (n=118)
Rural 85.7 (n=12) 88.9 (n=32) 88.7 (n=702) 35.7 (n=5) 22.2 (n=8) 31.7 (n=251)
Employment Status
Full Time 79.2 (n=19) 95.9 (n=47) 89.8 (n=879) 33.3 (n=8) 24.5 (n=12) 31.1 (n=304)
Part Time 100 (n=7) 71.4 (n=15) 85.6 (n=231) 14.3 (n=1) 19.0 (n=4) 24.1 (n=65)
Note. Values are prevalences (%) and total numbers.

4. Discussion

The current investigation from the From Science 2 School study aimed to assess the lifestyle interests, dietary motivations, and associations of key health behaviors among Austrian secondary school teachers and principals following vegan, vegetarian and omnivorous diets. The most important findings include: (1) the prevalence of each respective diet type show the majority of secondary teachers/principal following an omnivorous diet, with a vegan/vegetarian diet adherence similar to current reports; (2) significantly more males consumed an omnivorous diet and significantly more females consumed a vegetarian diet; (3) health is the main driver for a specific diet choice and PA, sports & exercise engagement and lifestyle were reported the predominant lifestyle preferences among school teachers/principals; (4) vegetable consumption was significantly greater among vegan and vegetarian subgroups; and (5) alcohol consumption and smoking prevalences were similar across dietary subgroups; and (6) although vegan teachers/participants are most active on a weekly basis, no differences were found regarding participation in leisure time PA, sports & exercise. Interestingly, despite vegan and vegetarian diet adherence among adults is linked to better health behavior and status due to higher health consciousness and interest [31: pp. 97-115, 126, 279, 362-408], and all the more combined with the established fact that health is linked to academic/educational level, yet the present investigation rejects the hypothesis that people following vegetarian (including vegan) diets have advanced health behaviors.

4.1. Diet Type Prevalences, Motivations, and Sociodemographics

Typically, reports of vegetarian diets have been found to range around 7% of the global population [71]. Whereas in German culture, vegetarian nutrition appears to be slightly less common, with known nationwide prevalences ranging up to 6% [72]. The vegan diet, a special type of vegetarian nutrition, considering the absence of animal meat consumption as well as any product from animal origin [69,70], is even less prevalent around the world (~2-3%) [71]. However, background numbers reported 51 % of European citizens, 51% of Austrian and 59% of German populations have reduced their meat intakes [73,74], with at least 75 million (10 %) Europeans adhere to a vegan or vegetarian diet [75]. Austria currently has the highest fraction of people eating vegan (5% vegans, 5 % vegetarians, 37% flexitarians) while Germany has the highest prevalence of flexitarian dieters (4 % vegans, 6 % vegetarians, 40% flexitarians) [73], with the prevalence of vegans and vegetarians in Germany has doubled during the COVID-19 pandemic [76]. Thus, while approximately 9 in 10 teachers/principals reported eating a traditional mixed diet, the present investigation includes a similar prevalence of vegetarian dieters with vegan reports found slightly below the current average among Austrian school teachers/principals as compared to the general population. Interestingly, it was revealed that a considerable group of vegetarian dieters and most of the vegan dieters had switched to their current diet within the previous five years, indicating that many of these participants were rather novice among their dietary subgroups. However, it has been reported that (i) females are more likely to withdraw from the consumption of meat (or all animal products) and (ii) people with higher levels of education follow vegetarian nutrition to a greater extent, possibly due to underlying ethical considerations (e.g., that it is not a necessity to kill for survival or to maintain long-term sustainable health) [77]. These findings may explain why the present veggie subgroups were more interested in the lifestyle of their diet as well as the motivations of the veggie dieters, which were mostly linked to health, environmental protection, and animal welfare. A recent report on contemporary eating trends found that especially health (47% vs. 49%), animal welfare (31% vs. 39%), and environment (27% vs. 30 %) rank the top three motives in Austria, Germany, and across Europe (health: 38-57%; animal welfare: 13-40%; environment: 12-37%) [73,74]. Moreover, 8 in 10 teachers/principals of the present study reported PA, sports & exercise engagement and lifestyle as dominant lifestyle preferences with approximately 85% of omnivores reporting being active as most important.
Previous results from the WHO Health Behavior of School Aged Children (HBSC) on Austrian teachers [56,57,61], the WIENGS (Vienna’s network for health promoting schools), the Austrian Teacher and Principal Health Study (ATPHS) [53,55,59,60,61,62,63,78], and the OECD TALIS (Teaching and Learning International Survey) [64,65] reports, however, missed the importance of current nutritional trends, nicotine and alcohol consumption, and lacked the linkage of PA patterns with diet types.
In comparison, significantly more males were found to follow the omnivorous rather than a plant-predominant diet in the present investigation, which aligns with the previous literature on the topic, and is possibly due to an underlying cultural misappropriation of the link between meat and masculinity [77,79]. The Global Burden of Disease 2017 Diet Collaborators studied the health effects and overall impact of poor dietary habits on NCD mortality and found that the global consumption of processed meat, sodium, and red meat were markedly above the optimal levels (90%, 86%, and 18% greater, respectively), with men generally having higher intakes of healthy and unhealthy foods than women [80]. Therefore, the sex difference between the omnivorous diet subgroup and vegetarian diet subgroup is likely one indication for explaining the difference in body weight between these groups. This finding is consistent with an Austrian report on teachers as a part of the WHO 2010 HBSC study [56,57], including 60.6% of teachers having a normal BMI (vs. 63% in the current study), and overweight/obesity was much higher among males than females (40.6% vs. 14.7%). On the other hand, the underlying BMI difference may also be a reflection of replacing meat from the diet with a lower calorie plant food alternative [81]. However, although vegans were found having the lowest BMI there were no significant differences in BMI across dietary subgroups, which is inconsistent with previous findings where adults consuming vegan diets were found to have the only normal BMI between the three groups [82]. Additionally, the present findings on underweight in teachers are consistent with literature from the HBSC report [56,57], as women (underweight prevalent in females only) tend to present such conditions more commonly than men.

4.2. Fruit & Vegetable Consumption

While food and exercise are considered medicine each respectively, their related combination often mentioned as the HEAL (Healthy Eating & Active Living) approach to sustainable health may enfold additional cumulative health effects [83,84,85]. At the same time, overweight/obesity and insufficient PA/inactivity – coined as epidemics and/or crises by health experts – are well-accepted health issues of urgent concern, not only on a global but also on a national scale with a 34.4% overweight (vs. 17.4% obesity) prevalence and only a 23.6% incidence of minimum daily PA (vs. 19.9% fitness club members) [86,87,88,89].
While daily fruit consumption did not significantly differ across the dietary subgroups, the vegans reported markedly higher daily intake than vegetarians and omnivores. In the EPIC-Oxford study, it was revealed that people eating vegetarian and vegan diets (i.e., more plant-predominant kinds of diets) consumed significantly more fruit [90]. Therefore, an inconsistency was found with the previous research, although this tendency remains in the present findings. One explanation for the likely difference may be due to the rigorous definitions for each diet type, with the vegan dieters required in the present investigation to be eating 100% plant-predominant [69,70] along with the higher health consciousness linked to the generally higher academic/educational level in teachers/principals. Whereas the classification for the omnivorous subgroup, on the other hand, must have indicated the consumption of animal meat. Therefore, the natural differences between these diet types allow for the heightened consumption of fruit on the vegan diet due to the exclusion of specific foods (meat, dairy products, eggs) and the replacement of calories with further plant-predominant foods. Since 1978, the positive health effects from plant-predominant diets are convincing [91] and frequently confirmed from further renowned studies on vegan and vegetarian diets (e.g. Adventist Health Studies (AHS)1 and 2, EPIC-Oxford Study, Twin Nutrition Study (TwiNS)) and the connection with healthy longevity, better health outcomes, and greater health consciousness amidst healthier lifestyle patterns [28,82,90,92,93,94,95,96,97,98]. Subsequently, health outcomes revealed lower prevalences of NCDs and their risk factors among vegetarians and even more so among vegans [28].
This difference between the diet types was even more apparent considering daily vegetable consumption, as both the vegan as well as vegetarian dietary subgroup had significantly higher daily vegetables than the omnivorous subgroup. As fruit and vegetables are the primary components for a healthy diet, these foods should be consumed daily regardless of diet type, with five servings of fruit and vegetables recommended daily by the currently updated Austrian nutritional guidelines [99,100,101]. In connection, less than daily fruit and vegetable consumption is considered to be poor dietary intake, which is known to be the cause of 15% of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and 22% (>1 in 5) deaths globally among adults [80]; school teachers and principals in Austria as well as adults around the world are urged to at least consume 2 portions of fruit plus 3 vegetables every day [100,101]. Likewise, teachers are known to be major role models for imprinting the health behavior of their pupils [102,103]. The plant-predominant nature of the EAT-Lancet commission for the promotion of the planetary health diet is critically essential for all people to follow at a minimum for mitigating the imminent dangers of climate change (famine, disease, water shortages, forced migration, etc.) [104]. In addition, typical meat-centered, high-caloric omnivorous dietary patterns containing red and processed meats are associated with a variety of health issues and adverse effects (e.g., cardiovascular disease, cancer, type 2 diabetes, all-cause mortality, etc.), including overweight/obesity as major risk factor amongst others [105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112]. The negative effects of red meat on (all-cause and cardiovascular) mortality risk cannot be compensated for, even with the maximum intake from fruits and vegetables [113]. However, reports on fruit and vegetable intakes showed 6 in 10 and 7 in 10 teachers/principals with respective daily consumption of the present sample, with better intakes among part-time employees and females. Regardless of the kind of diet, daily whole plant food consumption high in fiber and low in fat (>90% of daily calories) with considerable variety (legumes, whole grains, fruit, vegetables) may be increased to vastly promote health [114,115]. While the topic of the healthfulness and safety of vegetarian and vegan nutrition is still debated, often with an unenthusiastic or even prejudicial connotation [116,117,118,119,120,121], most dietitians (75%) lack knowledge on plant foods, protein, and especially whole food vegan diets and feel they did not receive adequate education (79%) [122].
A recent survey performed on 5,000 secondary school pupils aged 14-20 years initiated by the Austrian Pupils´ Representatives revealed that 87% of Austrian school children are generally interested in how nutrition affects physical health, 71% on the impact of food on environment, and 82% reported the desire to receive more nutritional education in class during regular school time to consider healthy school meals as important [123,124]. However, as by state mandate this learning content is already coped by school health promotion as overarching teaching principle and educational goal across all grades (primary to secondary level II), with competence-oriented application relevant to teachers of all compulsory subjects enabling pupils to impart health knowledge in larger contexts [125]. However, school sports as starting point (considered as special task of school sports) and primarily the compulsory subject Physical Education has the leading role concerning holistic health concept contribution to the health promoting life organization even by dealing with such health topics [126,127,128]. Therefore, and since not only dietitians and doctors lack basic health knowledge, also teachers need to be adequately educated and trained at university/college in order to be able to empower their pupils accordingly in the future [126,127,128].

4.3. Fluid Intake, Alcohol, and Nicotine Consumption

Adults in Europe are suggested to consume 2 or 2.5 liters of water per day (as plain water, other beverages, and/or within foods) for women and men, respectively [129]. The vast majority of the present sample (73%) indicated less than adequate daily fluid consumption. However, the present participants did not consider the water contained in the foods they consumed as part of their daily fluid intake, which may have led to an adequate daily water intake, especially with foods high in water like fruits and vegetables [130]. Considering that daily vegetable intake was higher among the vegetarian and vegan subgroups, this may have contributed to a better hydration status in these subgroups without revealing a difference in absolute fluid intake. About 3 in 4 teachers/principals (76.1%) of the total sample did, however, report water as the most common fluid consumed (with an additional water-based prevalence of approx. 10 % from tea, adding up to a total of more than 8 in 10 participants reported daily water/tea intake), which is indicative of their alignment with basic health intuition [129]. The omnivorous subgroup was the only group to consider coffee as the favored beverage, which may be related to the heightened awareness previously identified among vegetarians and vegans concerning the inessential substances they consume on a regular basis [131].
Interestingly, while most participants (approx. 8 in 10) reported alcohol intake with higher prevalence in full-time teachers/principals, and only a minor incidence of about 1 out of 10 reported smoking, no difference was found among the diet types concerning alcohol intake or smoking habits, which is inconsistent with a previous large-scale, epidemiological study (Adventist Health Study II) and may be related to the present sample being schoolteachers and school staff of a European country, whereas previous findings were connected to a religious cohort in the USA [131]. However, another study on Belgian adults found an association between vegetarian diets, alcohol consumption, and smoking habits, where the vegetarian (including vegan) subgroup was the least likely to consume either [132]. The lack of difference found in the present investigation concerning alcohol consumption and smoking habits may also be related to the relatively small numbers of participants among the vegetarian (n = 70) and vegan subgroups (n = 31) with a considerable group of novice dieters (36.6% and 64.5%, respectively) compared to the total number in the omnivorous subgroup (n = 1,249). Also, it was previously found by the WHO HBSC study that teachers have a lower occurrence of smoking than the general population (12.6% vs. 23.3%) and most teachers were found to quit with older age [56,57]. The previous findings were in line with a study on German teachers indicating 20% smoking prevalence [67]. Future research is suggested to include further analyses concerning inessential substance consumption among vegetarian and vegan dietary groups, especially considering subgroup analyses with participants adhering to their diet type for long-duration (e.g., >5 years, lifelong veganism/vegetarianism).

4.4. PA, Sports & Exercise Levels, Interests, and Motivations

Nearly 9 out of 10 (or 89%) secondary school teachers/principals in the present study reported engagement in leisure time PA, sports & exercise (up to 92% in both vegan females and omnivorous males) with a big fraction of those (approx. one third) additionally being club sports members, too. A discrepancy with previous research was found regarding the similarity of PA levels of about 3 days/week across the dietary subgroups [82], with the vegans being most active of all dietary subgroups along with vegetarians on average being active at >3 days/week vs omnivores at <3 days/week. In the present sample, the majority of teachers/principals (approx. 82%) considered an active lifestyle to be the most meaningful, which may partly explain the similarity between the participants´ PA levels. This finding may be related to PA, sports & exercise being the most frequently reported lifestyle interest among the vegan subgroup (41.9%). Likewise, about a third of Austrian teachers (32.5%) were previously found to engage in PA on at least three occasions per week [56,57]. The omnivorous subgroup, on the other hand, most frequently mentioned PA, sports & exercise as the top lifestyle interest (85.1%), however, this group performed the least weekly PA, sports & exercise. Lethargy may be a common occurrence following omnivorous nutrition due to a higher incidence of energy dense foods (animal meats, dairy products, eggs) contributing to a demanding metabolism and also an apple/pear-shaped physique [81,133]. Previously it was found that 72% of teachers in Germany were engaging in regular sporting activity [67]. This result may be connected to an increased interest for an exercise-focused (e.g., healthy) lifestyle but lacking the elevated energy levels to follow through. However, health was the top motivation among all dietary subgroups (46.6% overall), which may indicate that the present sample was more health conscious than the general population [134] possibly due to being more educated and holding professional roles within the context of the school setting. Previously, the Austrian HBSC report found that male and female teachers were more active than the general population [56,57].
The overview of the present study shows healthier lifestyle behavior of Austrian secondary school teachers/principals (associated with BMI, PA pattern, alcohol intake, smoking) compared to the general population of Austria [56,87,88]. This finding might be associated with the increased education and knowledge among teachers, particularly more individual attributes (including values, competencies, skills, certifications) and social conditions (e.g., networking, peer support) that aid implementing more scientifically supported healthy behavior [38,53,54,55,56,57]. According to and independent of the socio-economic background of children and adolescents, schools as a health-promoting environment are a particularly suitable setting for the development and training of healthy behaviors in crucial phases of life [42,43,44,126]. Likewise, previous data show the health of teachers is vital for the quality of teaching, including pupil learning outcomes [135], with the role of the teacher as a multiplier, being the leading factor of successful educational systems [136]. In general, a close relationship exists between health, action competence, and personality development [51]. Moreover, positive attitudes towards healthy lifestyle behavior is known to track over time (e.g., childhood to adulthood and old age) [137,138]. With regard to the UN SDGs #3 – Good Health and Wellbeing and #4 – High Quality Education as well as the UNESCO learning objective “cross-cutting competencies” [139,140,141], teacher health is not only a prerequisite but is essential for building successful societies; healthy teachers contribute positivity for the education and growth of healthy children, with a powerful influence on pupil lifestyle decisions [121,142]. Teacher health promotion is therefore not a “private matter” concerning the individual teachers themselves but a noteworthy contribution to the education system as a whole, reaching the general public, too [51], including public health benefits for nations like Austria.
Recent investigation from the health survey of 5,082 Austrian school headmasters and teachers (ATPHS action report) included no results on PA, sports & exercise, nutrition (fruit, vegetables), smoking, or alcohol consumption but urged the strategic importance of health promotion [60]. In a recent report, teachers in an Austrian health study self-reported a high level of health [53]. Likewise, the WIENGS study also lacked critical results on PA, sports & exercise, nutrition (fruits, vegetables), smoking, and alcohol due to a closer approach on mental health but highlighted the importance of health promotion at school for teachers and pupils [53,57,59,78]. Further, results from an overview on teacher health in Austria and Germany also failed to include findings on PA, sports & exercise, nutrition (fruits, vegetables), smoking, and alcohol with rising concern for the current mental health situation for teachers [61,62,63], and also the link pointed out by earlier research [68,144]. A recent study reported on the high-demanding nature of being a teacher, which may be related to a higher level of stress and hypertension [66,145] although generally better health is found among teachers in Austria [61,62,146]. However, before an improvement of the mental health situation among teachers may be realized, physical health still has much room for improvement, although generally better than the normal population [59,145,147]. Results from the TALIS study also lacked the analysis of PA, sports & exercise, nutrition (fruit, vegetables) smoking, and/or alcohol consumption but found that teachers and headmasters are mostly satisfied with their professional roles (>93% vs >97%, respectively) [64,65]. Teachers are a valuable target group of research and important stakeholders in schools but have yet received little attention and help concerning health promotion [49,148], and at the same time, are expected to take on even more functional and roles of importance in the school setting [48,68].

4.5. Study Limitations and Strengths

Several limitations should be considered when interpreting the findings of the present investigation. The present study was developed as the first to examine differences in the motives, lifestyle preferences, and basic health behaviors of secondary school teachers/principals distinctly differentiated by vegan, vegetarian, and omnivorous diets in order to align with current trends towards more sustainable diets. While cross-sectional studies share the common limitation that no causality may be drawn from the results [149], the study design does allow for large samples to be accessed with particularly relevant themes based on previous literature to better elaborate the context of important areas for aiding future research with interventional designs or even randomized controlled trials [149]. Importantly, the questionnaire of the present study was based on health-related topics, which likely favored the occurrence of socially acceptable answers (e.g., BMI, water intake, fruit, and vegetable consumption). However, control questions were implemented throughout the questionnaire to identify inconsistencies for their removal previous to data analyses. In addition, the present sample appears to have provided highly reliable responses considering their respective professional roles (e.g., school teachers and principals, etc.) as pillars of society in connection with the finding of no study exclusions due to conflicting data sets on e. g. height and body weight, thus plausible calculated BMI. Moreover, with a population of approximately 9 million, Austria has the largest vegan and also a large vegetarian population, respectively 5% and 5% [73,74]. The subjects in this investigation were predominantly female (n = 941; approx. 70%) also among vegan (>3:1-ratio) and vegetarian (6:1-ratio) dietary subgroups, which aligns with previous reports [77] and are in line with reports of females to be more health conscious and interested in following healthy, sustainable diets [150,151]. Likewise, study participation was voluntary, which may limit the results to the highly motivated teachers and principals.
A major strength of the present investigation is the basis of the study on Austrian secondary school teachers and principals, as influential role models of favorable health behavior for society, including a large sample (1.5% of the total: 89,243 nationwide population). The present sample did, however, include a sex difference with a predominance of female vs. male participation (2:1 ratio) and more females in the vegan/vegetarian subgroups (5-6 times). While this finding may appear to increase bias, the outcome is rather trivial considering the approach of the cross-sectional design. Additionally, while the results of the omnivorous dietary subgroup were based on a large and representative sample (minimum sample required was n = 984; see study protocol at https://www.science2.school/en/#Publications), it is still difficult to enroll a sufficiently large sample of vegans and vegetarians to participate in a study. Thus, although comparable (7.7% pooled) to current reports available on sustainable diet trends among the Austrian population, the respective numbers of vegan and vegetarian dieters in the present investigation were relatively low with a high prevalence of rather novice vegans (64.5%). The present study is the first to overcome the lack of knowledge and bridge the gap in current literature related to adults populations with higher academic level within the educational setting and also to consider the connection of diet type with basic health behaviors among school teachers and principals. Thus, the findings may be especially relevant for the promotion of future health among Austrian teachers, principals, superintendents, and other school staff as well as the close relationship with school pupils, their parents/guardians, and other similar socio-cultural backgrounds.

5. Conclusions

The present investigation of secondary school teachers and principals health behavior as part of the From Science 2 School study revealed novel findings concerning the connection of diet type (vegan, vegetarian, omnivorous) to contribute to close the gap in teachers reports available. The present investigation found no broad advancement of health behavior among vegan/vegetarian dieters as compared to the general omnivorous dieters (PA behavior, fruit consumption, alcohol intake, or smoking habits), which may be due to the generally higher health interest and consciousness of teachers since health is linked to educational level. Body weight was found to be significantly higher among the omnivores, which may be related to the finding that vegans and vegetarians were significantly more likely to consume vegetables on a regular basis (i.e. the inverse relationship of vegetable consumption with body weight) and be more active on a weekly basis. Health was the most important reason for dietary choice, sports engagement, and the predominant lifestyle preference across all dietary subgroups. School teachers, principals and pedagogues are highly-valuable role models and multipliers for promoting the health situation of future generations. Thus, every effort (personal, scientific, school policy, governmental support, etc.) should be made to prioritize improving the health behavior of teachers, principals and pedagogues for benefitting the public health in Austria as well as similar nations around the world.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization was completed by KW, DT, and CD. DT and KW drafted the manuscript. CD provided statistical methodology along with KW. CD appraised the data and performed the formal analysis. GW provided technical assistance. KW provided supervision.GR, WK, and MS provided critical review. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This school study (From Science 2 School; nationwide, Austria) was funded by the TWF (Tiroler Wissenschaftsförderung; reference number: UNI-0404/2413). The TWF had no part in study design, conduction, data collection, data analysis, presentation, and/or publication of the findings.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data are not made publicly available due to data protection and security laws.

Acknowledgments

This study was made possible with the support of the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research in Austria (Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung (BMBWF): Abteilung I/7 – Schul/Universitätssport). The nine Austrian Federal Education Authorities approved this study (see: https://www.science2.school/en/#Partners). In addition, Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Katharina Wirnitzer, BEd (principal investigator) would like express gratitude for the administrative and personal support for the study, including the aid of partners, governmental, and federal authorities of education. The follow-up study, Sustainably Healthy – From Science 2 Highschool & University, seamlessly surveyed the prevalence of physical exercise connected with diet type in the tertiary educational setting in Austria, which commenced in 2021 (end of data collection: July 31st). No professional relationship exists with companies or manufacturers that benefit from the results of this study.

Appendix A

Results supplemental to the main text are provided within Appendix Tables A1 and A2.
Table A1. Prevalence (%) of motives for dietary choices by diet type for sex, school level, residence and employment status (N = 1,350).
Table A1. Prevalence (%) of motives for dietary choices by diet type for sex, school level, residence and employment status (N = 1,350).
Health Taste/
Preference
Animal Welfare Environment Protection Tradition Food Quality Family Sports
Performance
Social
Aspects
No specific reason/
Other

TOTAL SAMPLE
Overview 46.4 22.6 4.1 1.6 9.6 7.0 1.1 0.8 0.1 6.4
Omnivorous 46.9 23.8 1.4 1.1 10.2 7.4 1.1 0.9 0.3 6.8
Vegetarian 37.1 10.0 40.0 5.7 NA 2.9 1.4 NA 1.4 1.4
Vegan 48.4 3.2 29.0 12.9 3.2 NA NA NA NA 3.2
MALE Omnivorous 45.9 25.8 1.0 0.8 10.5 4.3 0.5 1.8 0.3 9.2
Vegetarian 30.0 NA 50.0 10.0 NA NA NA NA NA 10.0
Vegan 28.6 NA 57.1 14.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA
FEMALE Omnivorous 47.4 22.9 1.6 1.3 10.2 8.9 1.4 0.5 0.2 5.7
Vegetarian 38.3 11.7 38.3 5.0 NA 3.3 1.7 NA 1.7 NA
Vegan 54.2 4.2 20.8 12.5 4.2 NA NA NA NA 4.2
MIDDLE SCHOOL Omnivorous 50.0 21.9 1.4 0.5 11.3 7.0 1.4 1.0 NA 5.6
Vegetarian 30.0 13.3 43.3 6.7 NA NA NA NA 3.3 3.3
Vegan 40.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 NA NA NA NA NA 10.0
HIGH SCHOOL Omnivorous 46.3 23.2 1.0 1.0 10.9 8.5 0.3 0.8 0.2 7.8
Vegetarian 55.6 7.4 25.9 7.4 NA 3.7 NA NA NA NA
Vegan 53.8 NA 23.1 15.4 7.7 NA NA NA NA NA
MIDDLE & HIGH SCHOOL POOLED Omnivorous 43.2 28.4 2.5 NA 7.8 5.8 2.5 0.8 NA 6.5
Vegetarian 15.4 7.7 61.5 NA NA 7.7 7.7 NA NA NA
Vegan 50.0 NA 37.5 12.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA
URBAN Omnivorous 44.5 25.1 1.5 1.5 8.7 8.1 0.9 0.7 0.2 8.7
Vegetarian 38.2 5.9 38.2 5.9 NA 5.9 2.9 NA NA 2.9
Vegan 58.8 NA 29.4 5.9 NA NA NA NA NA 5.9
RURAL Omnivorous 48.3 23.0 1.4 0.9 11.4 7.1 1.3 1.0 NA 5.7
Vegetarian 36.1 13.9 41.7 5.6 NA NA NA NA 2.8 NA
Vegan 35.7 7.1 28.6 21.4 7.1 NA NA NA NA NA
FULL TIME Omnivorous 48.1 24.2 1.2 1.0 10.2 6.5 0.9 0.9 0.1 6.7
Vegetarian 36.7 10.2 38.8 6.1 NA 2.0 2.0 NA 2.0 2.0
Vegan 37.5 4.2 37.5 12.5 4.2 NA NA NA NA 4.2
PART TIME Omnivorous 42.6 22.2 2.2 1.5 11.1 10.7 1.9 0.7 NA 7.0
Vegetarian 38.1 9.5 42.9 4.8 NA 4.8 NA NA NA NA
Vegan 85.7 NA NA 14.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA
Note. NA – no answer/not applicable.
Table A2. Prevalence (%) of lifestyle preferences for dietary choices by diet type for sex, school level, residence and employment status (N = 1,350).
Table A2. Prevalence (%) of lifestyle preferences for dietary choices by diet type for sex, school level, residence and employment status (N = 1,350).
Sport
Engagement
Sport
Lifestyle
Eating Meat Vegetarian Diet Vegetarian Lifestyle Vegan Diet Vegan
Lifestyle
Alcohol Smoking

TOTAL SAMPLE
Overview 70.7 10.9 4.1 7.4 2.4 1.1 0.9 1.6 0.7
Omnivorous 73.7 11.4 4.5 5.0 2.2 0.1 0.6 1.8 0.7
Vegetarian 31.4 5.7 NA 51.4 5.7 4.3 1.4 NA NA
Vegan 41.9 3.2 NA 3.2 3.2 35.5 9.7 NA 3.2
MALE Omnivorous 79.1 10.5 3.6 3.1 1.3 NA 0.3 1.5 0.8
Vegetarian 30.0 NA NA 50.0 10.0 10.0 NA NA NA
Vegan 71.4 NA NA NA NA 14.3 14.3 NA NA
FEMALE Omnivorous 71.2 11.8 4.9 6.0 2.7 0.1 0.8 1.9 0.7
Vegetarian 31.7 6.7 NA 51.7 6.7 3.3 NA NA NA
Vegan 33.3 4.2 NA 4.2 4.2 41.7 8.3 NA 4.2
MIDDLE SCHOOL Omnivorous 73.3 13.5 4.6 4.3 2.2 NA 0.5 0.7 1.0
Vegetarian 23.3 NA NA 60.0 10.0 3.3 3.3 NA NA
Vegan 30.0 NA NA NA 10.0 40.0 20.0 NA NA
HIGH SCHOOL Omnivorous 74.7 10.0 3.7 5.8 2.2 02 0.7 2.0 0.7
Vegetarian 40.7 14.8 NA 33.3 3.7 7.4 NA NA NA
Vegan 38.5 7.7 NA 7.7 NA 30.8 7.7 NA 7.7
MIDDLE & HIGH SCHOOL POOLED Omnivorous 71.6 11.1 6.2 4.5 2.5 NA 0.8 2.9 0.4
Vegetarian 30.8 NA NA 69.2 NA NA NA NA NA
Vegan 62.5 NA NA NA 37.5 NA NA NA
URBAN Omnivorous 73.6 10.5 3.9 6.6 2.0 NA 0.4 2.0 1.1
Vegetarian 32.4 8.8 NA 55.9 NA 2.9 NA NA NA
Vegan 47.1 NA NA 5.9 5.9 29.4 11.8 NA NA
RURAL Omnivorous 73.7 11.9 4.8 4.2 2.4 0.1 0.8 1.6 0.5
Vegetarian 30.6 2.8 NA 47.2 11.1 5.6 2.8 NA NA
Vegan 35.7 7.1 NA NA NA 42.9 7.1 NA 7.1
FULL TIME Omnivorous 73.4 12.0 4.8 4.9 2.2 NA 0.5 1.3 0.8
Vegetarian 28.6 8.2 NA 51.0 8.2 2.0 2.0 NA NA
Vegan 41.7 NA NA NA 4.2 37.5 12.5 NA 4.2
PART TIME Omnivorous 74.4 9.3 3.3 5.6 2.2 0.4 1.1 3.3 0.4
Vegetarian 38.1 NA NA 52.4 9.5 NA NA NA NA
Vegan 42.9 14.3 NA 14.3 NA 28.6 NA NA NA
Note. NA – no answer/not applicable.

References

  1. Harrap C (2024). 2024 Olympics Set To Double Its Plant-Based Food Offering. The Paris 2024 Summer Olympics will be more plant-based than ever. Plant Based News, 20. 2. 2024: https://plantbasednews.org/culture/events/olympics-double-plant-based-food/ (10.10. 2024).
  2. Irish Farmers Journal (2024). Paris Olympics going 60% meat-free, online 8. 5. 2024: https://www.farmersjournal.ie/news/dealer/paris-olympics-going-60-meat-free-816267 (10.10.2024).
  3. Rowlands S (2024). Exclusive: More than 60% of food at the Olympic Games will be vegan for first time ever. Mirror online, 23. 3. 2024: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/more-60-food-olympic-games-32426179#google_vignette (10. 10. 2024).
  4. Schattauer G (2024) UEFA-Pläne für Deutschland. Vegane Kost, Unisex-Toiletten, Meldestelle – so „woke“ wird die Fußball-EM 2024. Focus online, 23.6.2024: https://www.focus.de/sport/uefa-plaene-fuer-deutschland-fussball-em-2024-welche-woken-regeln-die-uefa-geplant-hat_id_199488249.html (10.10.2024).
  5. Epp M (2024a) Unisex-Toiletten, alkoholfreie Getränke, vegane Speisen: UEFA plant Zusatz-Angebote bei der EM 2024. Frankfurter Rundschau online: 12.4.2024: https://www.fr.de/sport/fussball/em-2024-uefa-nachhaltigkeit-umwelt-lahm-strategiepapier-vegan-92411292.html (10.10.2024).
  6. Epp M (2024b) Vegane Speisen, Unisex-Toiletten: EM 2024 soll neue Maßstäbe setzen. Tz online, 12.4.2024: https://www.tz.de/sport/fussball/em-2024-uefa-nachhaltigkeit-umwelt-lahm-strategiepapier-vegan-92411293.html (10.10.2024).
  7. Knauth S (2024) Fußball-EM 2024: Fußball zwischen Bier, Bratwurst und etwas Veganem. News.de, 7.6.2024: https://www.news.de/sport/857813651/fussball-zwischen-bier-bratwurst-und-etwas-veganem-fussball-em-2024-news-der-dpa-aktuell-zu-em-kabarett-und-fussball/1/ (10.10.2024).
  8. World Health Organization (2021). Plant-based diets and their impact on health, sustainability and the environment: a review of the evidence: WHO European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2021. Document number: WHO/EURO:2021-4007-43766-61591.
  9. Poore J, Nemecek T (2018). Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360,987-992(2018). [CrossRef]
  10. Scarborough, P., Clark, M., Cobiac, L. et al. (2023). Vegans, vegetarians, fish-eaters and meat-eaters in the UK show discrepant environmental impacts. Nat Food 4, 565–574 (2023). [CrossRef]
  11. Springmann M (2024). A multicriteria analysis of meat and milk alternatives from nutritional, health, environmental, and cost perspectives, PNAS, 121 (50) e2319010121. [CrossRef]
  12. Petter O (2020) Veganism is ‘single biggest way’ to reduce our environmental impact, study finds. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/veganism-environmental-impact-planet-reduced-plant-based-diet-humans-study-a8378631.html#:~:text=Lead%20author%20Joseph%20Poore%20said,land%20use%20and%20water%20use.%22 (14.10.2024).
  13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Technical Summary, page 117/505. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. [CrossRef]
  14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2023). CLIMATE CHANGE 2023 Synthesis Report, page 29/42. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf (23.3.2024).
  15. Schroeder SA. Shattuck Lecture. We can do better--improving the health of the American people. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1221–8. [CrossRef]
  16. GoInvo. Determinants of Health, 2017-2018. https://www.goinvo.com/vision/determinants-of-health/ (Accessed May 20, 2023).
  17. World Health Organization (2/2/2025). Noncommunicable diseases: Risk factors and conditions, https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/ncd-risk-factors.
  18. Marques, A., Peralta, M., Martins, J., Loureiro, V., Almanzar, P. C., and Matos, M. G. de (2019). Few European Adults are Living a Healthy Lifestyle. American journal of health promotion : AJHP. 33(3): 391–398.
  19. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (2/5/2025). GBD Results, https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/.
  20. World Health Organization (2/2/2025). Non communicable diseases, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases.
  21. World Health Organization (2018). Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD) Country Profiles, Austria. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/country-profiles/ncds/aut_en.pdf?sfvrsn=cd1153b_40&download=true.
  22. Statistik Austria. (19/3/2025). Todesursachen. https://www.statistik.at/statistiken/bevoelkerung-und-soziales/bevoelkerung/gestorbene/todesursachen.
  23. World Obesity Federation Global Obesity Observatory (2/5/2025). World Obesity Day Atlases | Obesity Atlas 2023. https://data.worldobesity.org/publications/?cat=19.
  24. Warburton, D. E. R., Nicol, C. W., and Bredin, S. S. D. (2006). Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 174(6): 801–809.
  25. Hansford HJ, Wewege MA, Cashin AG, Hagstrom AD, Clifford BK, McAuley JH, Jones MD. If exercise is medicine, why don't we know the dose? An overview of systematic reviews assessing reporting quality of exercise interventions in health and disease. British journal of sports medicine. 2022;56:692–700. [CrossRef]
  26. Barnard, N. D., Cohen, J., Jenkins, D. J. A., Turner-McGrievy, G., Gloede, L., Green, A., and Ferdowsian, H. (2009). A low-fat vegan diet and a conventional diabetes diet in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled, 74-wk clinical trial. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 89(5): 1588S-1596S.
  27. Esselstyn, C. B., Gendy, G., Doyle, J., Golubic, M., and Roizen, M. F. (2014). A way to reverse CAD? The Journal of family practice. 63(7): 356-364b.
  28. Orlich, M. J., and Fraser, G. E. (2014). Vegetarian diets in the Adventist Health Study 2: a review of initial published findings. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 100 Suppl 1(1): 353S-8S.
  29. Landry, M. J., Ward, C. P., Cunanan, K. M., Durand, L. R., Perelman, D., Robinson, J. L., Hennings, T., Koh, L., Dant, C., Zeitlin, A., Ebel, E. R., Sonnenburg, E. D., Sonnenburg, J. L., and Gardner, C. D. (2023). Cardiometabolic Effects of Omnivorous vs Vegan Diets in Identical Twins: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA network open. 6(11): e2344457.
  30. Michael Benjamin Arndt, Yohannes Habtegiorgis Abate, Mohsen Abbasi-Kangevari, Samar Abd ElHafeez, Michael Abdelmasseh, Sherief Abd-Elsalam, et al. Global, regional, and national progress towards the 2030 global nutrition targets and forecasts to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet. 2025;404:2543–83. [CrossRef]
  31. Leitzmann, C., Keller, M. (2020). Vegetarische und vegane Ernährung. 4., völlig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. UTB.
  32. Raghupathi, V., Raghupathi, W (2020). The influence of education on health: an empirical assessment of OECD countries for the period 1995–2015. Arch Public Health 78, 20 (2020). [CrossRef]
  33. Zajacova A, Lawrence EM (2018). The Relationship Between Education and Health: Reducing Disparities Through a Contextual Approach. Annual Review of Public Health, Vol. 39: 273-289.
  34. WHO Regional Office Europe (2015). Health 2020: Education and health through the life-course. Sector brief on Education, July 2015. Copenhagen, Denmark. Document number: WHO/EURO:2015-6161-45926-66190.
  35. Suhrcke M, de Paz Nieves C; WHO Regional Office Europe (2011). The impact of health and health behaviours on educational outcomes in high-income countries: a review of the evidence. Copenhagen, Denmark.
  36. Eide E, Showalter M (2011) Estimating the relation between health and education: What do we know and what do we need to know? Economics of Education Review, Volume 30, Issue 5, 2011: 778-791.
  37. Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) (2024). Learning for life: The higher the level of education, the lower the risk of dying. https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/newsroom/news-releases/learning-life-higher-level-education-lower-risk-dying.
  38. Hurrelmann K (2016). Zehn Thesen zur Lehrer- und Schülergesundheit; p. 7. In: Forum Schulstiftung (2016). Forum Schulstiftung, 64. Schwerpunkt: Die Gesunde Lehr-Kraft. Zeitschrift für die katholischen freien Schulen der Erzdiözese Freiburg. 26. Jahrgang; pp. 82. ISSN 1611342x.
  39. Cutler DM & Lleras-Muney A (2012). Education and Health: Insights from International Comparisons. Working Paper 17738. NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH. [CrossRef]
  40. Groot W, Maassen van den Brink H (2007). The health effects of education. Economics of Education Review 26 (2007): 186-200.
  41. Ross, C. E., & Wu, C. (1995). The Links Between Education and Health. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 719–745. [CrossRef]
  42. Grundsatzerlass. Erlass des Bundensministeriums fuer Unterricht und kulturelle Angelegenheiten GZ 27.909/115-V/3/96 vom 4. Maerz 1997. Rundschreiben Nr. 7/1997 Herausgegeben vom BMUK, Abt. V/3, Freyung 1, A-1014 Wien.
  43. Health promoting schools. 4/15/2025. https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-promoting-schools#tab=tab_1. Accessed 15 Apr 2025.
  44. Schools for Health in Europe | European School Education Platform. 4/14/2025. https://school-education.ec.europa.eu/en/discover/resources/schools-health-europe. Accessed 15 Apr 2025.
  45. He, L., Zhai, Y., Engelgau, M., Li, W., Qian, H., Si, X., Gao, X., Sereny, M., Liang, J., Zhu, X., and Shi, X. (2014). Association of children's eating behaviors with parental education, and teachers' health awareness, attitudes and behaviors: a national school-based survey in China. European journal of public health. 24(6): 880–887.
  46. Rechtsinformationssystem des Bundes (01/09/2024). Lehrplan der Allgemeinbildenden Höheren Schule, https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10008568&Artikel=&Paragraf=&Anlage=1&Uebergangsrecht=.
  47. Dadaczynski, K., Jensen, B.B., Viig, N.G., Sormunen, M., von Seelen, J., Kuchma, V. and Vilaça, T. (2020), "Health, well-being and education: Building a sustainable future. The Moscow statement on Health Promoting Schools", Health Education, Vol. 120 No. 1, pp. 11-19. [CrossRef]
  48. Scheuch, K., Seibt, R., Rehm, U., Riedel, R. & Melzer, W. (2010). Lehrer. In: S. Letzel & D. Nowak (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Arbeitsmedizin. Fulda: Fuldaer Verlagsanstalt.
  49. Johannsen, U. (2007). Die gesundheitsfördernde Schule. Gesundheitsförderung durch Organisations- und Schulentwicklung. Saarbrücken. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
  50. Wilf-Miron, R., Kittany, R., Saban, M., and Kagan, I. (2022). Teachers' characteristics predict students' guidance for healthy lifestyle: a cross-sectional study in Arab-speaking schools. BMC Public Health. 22(1): 1420.
  51. Nieskens B, Rupprecht S, and Erbring S. Was hält Lehrkräfte gesund? Ergebnisse der Gesundheitsforschung für Lehrkräfte und Schulen. In Handbuch Lehrergesundheit Impulse für die Entwicklung Guter Gesunder Schulen; Eine Veröffentlichung der DAK-Gesundheit und der Unfallkasse Nordrhein-Westfalen; Carl Link (Wolters Kuiwer): Köln, Germany (2012). p. 31–96.
  52. Bundesministerium für Bildung (BMB) (2025). Unterrichtsprinzipien. https://www.bmb.gv.at/Themen/schule/schulpraxis/prinz.html and https://www.bmb.gv.at/Themen/schule/schulpraxis/prinz/gesundheitsfoerderung.html (22.4.2025).
  53. Felder-Puig, R.; Ramelow, D.; Maier, G.; Teutsch, F. Ergebnisse der WieNGS Lehrer/Innen-Befragung 2017; Institut für Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention: Wien, Austria, 2017.
  54. Steen, R. Lehrer/innen stark machen!—Nachdenken über Gesundheit in der Schule. Ein Beitrag aus Sicht der Gesundheitsförderung. Make Teachers Stronger!—Considerations on Health in Schools. A Contribution from the Viewpoint of Health Promotion. Gesundheitswesen 2011, 73, 112–116.
  55. Teutsch, F.; Hofmann, F.; Felder-Puig, R. Kontext und Praxis schulischer Gesundheitsförderung. In Ergebnisse der Österreichischen Schulleiter/Innenbefragung 2014; LBIHPR Forschungsbericht; Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (BMG): Wien, Austria, 2015.
  56. Hofmann, F.; Griebler, R.; Ramelow, D.; Unterweger, K.; Griebler, U.; Felder-Puig, R.; Dür, W. Gesundheit und Gesundheitsverhalten von Österreichs Lehrer/Innen: Ergebnisse der Lehrer/Innenbefragung 2010; LBIHPR Forschungsbericht; Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (BMG): Wien, Austria, 2012.
  57. Hofmann, F.; Felder-Puig, R. HBSC Factsheet Nr. 05/2013. In Gesundheitszustand und—Verhalten Österreichischer Lehrkräfte: Ergebnisse der Lehrer/Innen-Gesundheitsbefragung 2010; LBIHPR Forschungsbericht; Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (BMG): Wien, Austria, 2013.
  58. Gesundheitsförderung in der Schule. 2015. https://www.sozialversicherung.at/cdscontent/?contentid=10007.844051&portal=svportal. Accessed 15 Apr 2025.
  59. Bono ML, Hart P (2024). Wiener Gesundheitsförderung. Abschlussbericht der Evaluation des „Wiener Netzwerks Gesundheitsfördernde Schulen“ (WieNGS) im Jahr 2023; pp. 45. (3.4.2025).
  60. Lillich, M. und Breil, C. (2024). Gesundheitsbefragung von österreichischen Schulleitungen und Pädagog:innen: Handlungsbericht; pp. 23. Wien: Institut für Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention. (3.4.2025).
  61. Felder-Puig R, Grieber R (2021). Studienergebnisse zur Gesundheit von Lehrkräften aus Österreich und Deutschland; pp 36-46. In: NCoC (National Center of Competence) für Psychosoziale Gesundheitsförderung an der Pädagogischen Hochschule Oberösterreich (Hrsg.) (2021).
  62. Gesundsein und Gesund bleiben im Schulalltag Wissenswertes und Praktisches zur Lehrer*innengesundheit. Handreichung für gute, gesundheitsfördernde Schulen; pp. 217. https://ph-ooe.at/fileadmin/Daten_PHOOE/Zentren/Persoenlichkeitsbildung/publikationen/HEPI_Publikation_Lehrerinnnengesundheit_ONLINE_2.5.pdf (3.4.2025).
  63. Felder-Puig R, Griebler R (2021): Studienergebnisse zur Gesundheit von Lehrkräften aus Österreich und Deutschland. In: Gesundsein und Gesundbleiben im Schulalltag. Wissenswertes und Praktisches zur Lehrer*innengesundheit. Handreichung für gute, gesundheitsfördernde Schulen. NCoC (National Center of Competence) für Psychosoziale Gesundheitsförderung an der Pädagogischen Hochschule Oberösterreich, Linz, pp. 36-56.
  64. Schmich J, Itzlinger-Bruneforth U (Hrsg.) (2019). TALIS 2018 (Band 1). Rahmenbedingungen des schulischen Lehrens und Lernens aus Sicht von Lehrkräften und Schulleitungen im internationalen Vergleich; pp. 148. Graz: Leykam. . ISBN 978-3-7011-8139-1.
  65. Schmich J, Opriessnig S (Hrsg.) (2020). TALIS 2018 (Band 2). Rahmenbedingungen des schulischen Lehrens und Lernens aus Sicht von Lehrkräften und Schulleitungen im internationalen Vergleich; pp. 120. Salzburg, 2020.
  66. Scheuch K, Haufe E, Seibt R: Teachers’ health. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015; 112: 347–56. [CrossRef]
  67. Scheuch K, Pardula T, Prodehl G, Winkler C, Seibt R (2016). Betriebsärztliche Betreuung von Lehrkräften. Ausgewählte Ergebnisse aus Sachsen. Präv Gesundheitsf, 2016; 11:147–153. [CrossRef]
  68. Schaarschmidt, U. (2005). Halbtagsjobber? Psychische Gesundheit im Lehrerberuf Analyse eines veränderungsbedürftigen Zustandes. Weinheim, Basel, Berlin: Beltz. 172 S.
  69. Melina, V., Craig, W., and Levin, S. (2016). Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 116(12): 1970–1980.
  70. Raj S, Guest NS, Landry MJ, Mangels AR, Pawlak R, Rozga M. Vegetarian dietary patterns for adults: a position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Journal fo the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2025;S2212-2672(25)00042-5.
  71. FMCG Gurus (2/5/2025). FMCG Gurus - Understanding the Growing Increase of Plant Based Diets - Global 2020 - FMCG Gurus, https://fmcggurus.com/reports/fmcg-gurus-understanding-the-growing-increase-of-plant-based-diets-global-2020/.
  72. Paslakis, G., Richardson, C., Nöhre, M., Brähler, E., Holzapfel, C., Hilbert, A., and Zwaan, M. de (2020). Prevalence and psychopathology of vegetarians and vegans - Results from a representative survey in Germany. Scientific reports. 10(1): 6840.
  73. Smart Protein Report (2023). Evolving appetites: an in-depth look at European attitudes towards plant-based eating. https://smartproteinproject.eu/european-attitudes-towards-plant-based-eating/ (23.1.2025).
  74. Vegane Gesellschaft Östereich (VGÖ) (2024). Österreich als Spitzenreiter beim Anteil von vegan und fleischlos lebenden Menschen. https://www.vegan.at/zahlen (23.1.2025).
  75. Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung (2014). Fleischatlas 2014 - Daten und Fakten über Tiere als Nahrungsmittel. https://www.boell.de/de/2014/01/07/fleischatlas-2014 (23.1.2025).
  76. Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft (2021). Deutschland, wie es isst – Der BMEL-Ernährungsreport 2021. https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/_Ernaehrung/ernaehrungsreport-2021.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=7 (23.1.2025).
  77. Leitzmann, C, Keller, M. Charakteristika vegetarischer Ernährungs- und Lebensformen. In Vegetarische und Vegane Ernährung, 4th ed.; Vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage; UTB, Bd 1868; Verlag Eugen Ulmer: Stuttgart, Germany, 2020; pp. 25–31. (In German).
  78. Ramelow, D et al. (2017): Ergebnisse der WieNGS-Lehrer*innen-Befragung 2012. Ludwig Boltzmann Institut - HPR, Wien.
  79. Ruby, M. B., and Heine, S. J. (2011). Meat, morals, and masculinity. Appetite. 56(2): 447–450.
  80. Ashkan Afshin, Patrick John Sur, Kairsten A. Fay, Leslie Cornaby, Giannina Ferrara, Joseph S Salama, et al (2019). Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. 393(10184): 1958–1972.
  81. Murphy, S. P., and Allen, L. H. (2003). Nutritional importance of animal source foods. The Journal of nutrition. 133(11 Suppl 2): 3932S-3935S.
  82. Orlich, M. J., Singh, P. N., Sabaté, J., Jaceldo-Siegl, K., Fan, J., Knutsen, S., Beeson, W. L., and Fraser, G. E. (2013). Vegetarian dietary patterns and mortality in Adventist Health Study 2. JAMA internal medicine. 173(13): 1230–1238.
  83. Kelly C, Clennin MN, Barela BA, Wagner A. Practice-Based Evidence Supporting Healthy Eating and Active Living Policy and Environmental Changes. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(2):166-172. [CrossRef]
  84. Koehler K, Drenowatz C. Integrated Role of Nutrition and Physical Activity for Lifelong Health. Nutrients. 2019;11(7):1437. Published 2019 Jun 26. [CrossRef]
  85. Houghtaling B, Balis L, Pradhananga N, Cater M, Holston D. Healthy eating and active living policy, systems, and environmental changes in rural Louisiana: a contextual inquiry to inform implementation strategies. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2023;20:132. [CrossRef]
  86. World Obesity Federation Global Obesity Observatory. Austria. 4/15/2025. https://data.worldobesity.org/country/austria-11/. Accessed 15 Apr 2025.
  87. Statistik Austria. Overweight and obesity. 11/16/2023. https://www.statistik.at/en/statistics/population-and-society/health/health-determinants/overweight-and-obesity. Accessed 15 Apr 2025.
  88. Statistik Austria. Physical activity. 12/19/2024. https://www.statistik.at/en/statistics/population-and-society/health/health-determinants/physical-activity. Accessed 15 Apr 2025.
  89. Schalit J. Physical inactivity costs estimated at €80bn per year. 6/18/2015. https://www.euractiv.com/section/sports/news/physical-inactivity-costs-estimated-at-80bn-per-year/. Accessed 15 Apr 2025.
  90. Key TJ, Papier K, Tong TYN. Plant-based diets and long-term health: findings from the EPIC-Oxford study. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2022;81:190–8. [CrossRef]
  91. Phillips R, Lemon F, Beeson W, Kzuma J (1978) Coronary heart disease mortality among seventh–day adventists with differing dietary habits: A preliminary report. Am J Clin Nutr 31: 191-198.
  92. Scientific Publications About Adventists | Adventist Health Study. https://adventisthealthstudy.org/researchers/scientific-publications/scientific-publications-about-adventists (accessed Feb 28, 2025).
  93. Adventist Health Study-1 Publication Database | Adventist Health Study. https://adventisthealthstudy.org/researchers/scientific-publications/adventist-health-study-1-publication-database (accessed Feb 28, 2025).
  94. Adventist Health Study-2 Publication Database | Adventist Health Study. https://adventisthealthstudy.org/researchers/scientific-publications/adventist-health-study-2-publication-database (accessed Feb 28, 2025).
  95. Dwaraka VB et al. (2023). Unveiling the Epigenetic Impact of Vegan vs. Omnivorous Diets on Aging: Insights from the Twins Nutrition Study (TwiNS). medRxiv 2023.12.26.23300543; [CrossRef]
  96. Ravi AK et al. (2025). Suboptimal dietary patterns are associated with accelerated biological aging in young adulthood: A study with twins. Clinical Nutrition, Volume 45 (2025): 10-21. [CrossRef]
  97. Jennings A et al. (2021) Increased habitual flavonoid intake predicts attenuation of cognitive ageing in twins. BMC Med 19, 185 (2021). [CrossRef]
  98. Tong TYN, Papier K, Key TJ. Meat, vegetables and health - interpreting the evidence. Nat Med. 2022 Oct;28(10):2001-2002. [CrossRef]
  99. Lee, S. H., Moore, L. V., Park, S., Harris, D. M., and Blanck, H. M. (2022). Adults Meeting Fruit and Vegetable Intake Recommendations - United States, 2019. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 71(1): 1–9.
  100. AGES. Österreichische Ernährungsempfehlungen. (2025). https://www.ages.at/mensch/ernaehrung-lebensmittel/ernaehrungsempfehlungen/oesterreichische-ernaehrungsempfehlungen. (22.04.2025).
  101. Gesundheit.gv.at (2024). Ernährungsempfehlungen: Gemüse, Obst und Hülsenfrüchte.https://www.gesundheit.gv.at/leben/ernaehrung/info/oesterreichische-ernaehrungspyramide/ernaehrungspyramide-obst-gemuese1.html (18.4.2025).
  102. Cheung, P. (2020). Teachers as role models for physical activity: Are preschool children more active when their teachers are active? European Physical Education Review. 26(1): 101–110.
  103. Okan O, Bauer U, Levin-Zamir D, Pinheiro P, and Sorensen K. International Handbook of Health Literacy. Research, Practice and Policy Across the Lifespan. Bristol: Policy Press (2019). [CrossRef]
  104. EAT Lancet Commission (4/7/2021). The Planetary Health Diet - EAT, https://eatforum.org/eat-lancet-commission/the-planetary-health-diet-and-you/.
  105. Murray, CJL, Aravkin, AY, Zheng, P ∙ et al. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 Lancet. 2020; 396:1223-1249.
  106. Kennedy, Joe et al. Estimated effects of reductions in processed meat consumption and unprocessed red meat consumption on occurrences of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, colorectal cancer, and mortality in the USA: a microsimulation study. The Lancet Planetary Health, Volume 8, Issue 7, e441 - e451.
  107. Yan D, Liu K, Li F, Shi D, Wei L, Zhang J, Su X, Wang Z. Global burden of ischemic heart disease associated with high red and processed meat consumption: an analysis of 204 countries and territories between 1990 and 2019. BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 17;23(1):2267. [CrossRef]
  108. Bouvard V, Loomis D, Guyton KZ, Grosse Y, Ghissassi FE, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, et al. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec 1;16(16):1599–600.
  109. WHO (2015) IARC Monographs evaluate consumption of red meat and processed meat. Press release N°240. https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr240_E.pdf (28.2.2025).
  110. WHO (2015) Q&A on the carcinogenicity of the consumption of red meat and processed meat. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat (28.2.2025).
  111. Li, Chunxiao et al. (2024). Meat consumption and incident type 2 diabetes: an individual-participant federated meta-analysis of 1·97 million adults with 100 000 incident cases from 31 cohorts in 20 countries. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, Volume 12, Issue 9, 619 – 630.
  112. Zhou, Xiao-Dong et al. (2024) Burden of disease attributable to high body mass index: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. eClinicalMedicine, Volume 76, 102848.
  113. Bellavia A, Stilling F, Wolk A (2016) High red meat intake and all-cause cardiovascular and cancer mortality: Is the risk modified by fruit and vegetable intake? Am J Clin Nutr 104: 1137-1143.
  114. Goldfarb G and Sela Y. The Ideal Diet for Humans to Sustainably Feed the Growing Population – Review, Meta-Analyses, and Policies for Change. F1000Research 2023, 10:1135. [CrossRef]
  115. Greger M. Plant-Based Nutrition to Slow the Aging Process. ijdrp. 2023;6(1):4 pp. [CrossRef]
  116. Alexy U. Diet and growth of vegetarian and vegan children. BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health 2023;6:e000697. [CrossRef]
  117. Jakše, B.; Fras, Z.; Fidler Mis, N. Vegan Diets for Children: A Narrative Review of Position Papers Published by Relevant Associations. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4715. [CrossRef]
  118. Athanasian CE, Lazarevic B, Kriegel ER, Milanaik RL. Alternative diets among adolescents: facts or fads? Curr Opin Pediatr. 2021 Apr 1;33(2):252-259. [CrossRef]
  119. Kiely ME. Risks and benefits of vegan and vegetarian diets in children. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2021;80(2):159-164. [CrossRef]
  120. Rudloff S, Bührer C, Jochum F, Kauth T, Kersting M, Körner A, Koletzko B, Mihatsch W, Prell C, Reinehr T, Zimmer KP. Vegetarian diets in childhood and adolescence : Position paper of the nutrition committee, German Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ). Mol Cell Pediatr. 2019 Nov 12;6(1):4. [CrossRef]
  121. Patelakis, E., Lage-Barbosa, C., Haftenberger, M., et al. (2019) Prevalence of Vegetarian Diet among Children and Adolescents in Germany. Results from EsKiMo II. Ernaehrungs Umschau, 66, 85-91.
  122. Metoudi M, Bauer A, Haffner T, Kassam S. A cross-sectional survey exploring knowledge, beliefs and barriers to whole food plant-based diets amongst registered dietitians in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 2025;38:e13386.
  123. Land schafft Leben (2024). Umfrage: 82 % der Schüler*innen ist gesundes Schulessen wichtig. OTS, 15. Mai 2024. https://www.ots.at/presseaussendung/OTS_20240515_OTS0100/umfrage-82-der-schuelerinnen-ist-gesundes-schulessen-wichtig (18.4.2025).
  124. PULS 24 (2024). Wunsch nach mehr gesundem Essen an Österreichs Schulen. Chronik, 15. Mai 2024. https://www.puls24.at/news/chronik/wunsch-nach-mehr-gesundem-essen-an-oesterreichs-schulen/328255 (18.4.2025).
  125. Bundesministerium für Bildung (BMB) (2025). Unterrichtsprinzipien. https://www.bmb.gv.at/Themen/schule/schulpraxis/prinz.html and https://www.bmb.gv.at/Themen/schule/schulpraxis/prinz/gesundheitsfoerderung.html (22.4.2025).
  126. Troppe I, Tanous DR, Wirnitzer KC (2024) Bewegung & Sport im Lead der schulischen Gesundheitsförderung – Ein systematischer Review der Primarstufen-Curricula in der D-A-CH Region im Kontext des Pflichtfächerkanons. Bewegung & Sport – Die Fachzeitschrift für den Unterricht in Schulen, Kindergärten und Vereinen, Themenheft 02/2024 „Gesund sein, glücklich sein“, Seite 7-12.
  127. Motevalli M, Stanford FC, Apflauer G, Wirnitzer KC (2025) Integrating lifestyle behaviors in school education: A proactive approach to preventive medicine. Preventive Medicine Reports, 2025, 102999. [CrossRef]
  128. Motevalli M, Apflauer G, Wirnitzer KC (2024). Ist der Sportunterricht „fit for the future“? – Eine Perspektive zur Notwendigkeit, den Bewegungs- und Sportunterricht aufzuwerten, zu modernisieren und transformieren. In: Gross et al. (Hrsg.) Transfer Forschung <-> Schule. Heft 10. Nachhaltig gesund – bewegen, essen, kompetenzorientiert lernen: 162-172. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt: https://www.klinkhardt.de/verlagsprogramm/2683.html.
  129. Armstrong, L. E., and Johnson, E. C. (2018). Water Intake, Water Balance, and the Elusive Daily Water Requirement. Nutrients. 10(12).
  130. Montenegro-Bethancourt, G., Johner, S. A., and Remer, T. (2013). Contribution of fruit and vegetable intake to hydration status in schoolchildren. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 98(4): 1103–1112.
  131. Orlich, M. J., Jaceldo-Siegl, K., Sabaté, J., Fan, J., Singh, P. N., and Fraser, G. E. (2014). Patterns of food consumption among vegetarians and non-vegetarians. British Journal of Nutrition. 112(10): 1644–1653.
  132. Alewaeters, K., Clarys, P., Hebbelinck, M., Deriemaeker, P., and Clarys, J. P. (2005). Cross-sectional analysis of BMI and some lifestyle variables in Flemish vegetarians compared with non-vegetarians. Ergonomics. 48(11-14): 1433–1444.
  133. Fu, J., Hofker, M., and Wijmenga, C. (2015). Apple or pear: size and shape matter. Cell Metabolism. 21(4): 507–508.
  134. Buchmann, M., Jordan, S., Loer, A.-K. M., Finger, J. D., and Domanska, O. M. (2023). Motivational readiness for physical activity and health literacy: results of a cross-sectional survey of the adult population in Germany. BMC Public Health. 23(1): 331.
  135. Rothland, M.; Klusmann, U. Belastung und Beanspruchung im Lehrerberuf. In Enzyklopädie Erziehungswissenschaft Online (EEO); Rahm, S., Nerowski, C., Eds.; Fachgebiet Schulpädagogik; Juventa: Weinheim, Germany, 2012.
  136. Barber M, Mourshed M. How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Company. 9/1/2007.
  137. Agirbasli M, Tanrikulu AM, Berenson GS. Metabolic Syndrome: Bridging the Gap from Childhood to Adulthood. Cardiovasc Ther. 2016 Feb;34(1):30-6. [CrossRef]
  138. Delaney L, Smith JP. Childhood health: trends and consequences over the life course. Future Child. 2012 Spring;22(1):43-63. [CrossRef]
  139. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals. (2025). https://sdgs.un.org/goals. (22.04.2025).
  140. UNESCO. Cross-cutting competencies. (2025). https://www.unsdglearn.org/unesco-cross-cutting-and-specialized-sdg-competencies/. (22.04.2025).
  141. UNESCO (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: learning objectives, pp. 66. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444 (18.4.2025).
  142. Wong, L.S.; Gibson, A.-M.; Farooq, A.; Reilly, J.J. Interventions to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in elementary school physical education lessons: Systematic review. J. Sch. Health 2021, 91, 836–845.
  143. Hofmann, F et al. (2012): Gesundheit und Gesundheitsverhalten von Österreichs Lehrer*innen. Ergebnisse der Lehrer*innenbefragung 2010. Ludwig Boltzmann Institut - HPR, Wien.
  144. Schaarschmidt, Uwe/ Fischer, Andreas W. (2003): AVEM – Arbeitsbezogenes Verhaltens- und Erlebensmuster. Handanweisung. Swets & Zeitlinger, Frankfurt. 2. Auflage.
  145. Schuch S (2024). Gesundheit von Lehrpersonen - alle Schulstufen.; pp 60. GIVE-Servicestelle für Gesundheitsförderung an Österreichs Schulen https://www.give.or.at/material/lehrerinnen-gesundheit/ (3.4.2025).
  146. FRICK, Jürg (2015): Gesund bleiben im Lehrberuf. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber, Hogrefe AG, ISBN 978-3-456-85474-8.
  147. BANGERT, Carsten (2005): Mit aktivem Selbstmanagement zu mehr Gesundheit und Zufriedenheit im Lehrberuf. In: Tagungsband Lehrergesundheit. Praxisrelevante Modelle zur nachhaltigen Gesundheitsförderung von Lehrern auf dem Prüfstand. Dortmund, Berlin, Dresden: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (Hrsg.), S. 57–74. www.baua.de/DE/Angebote/Publikationen/Schriftenreihe/Tagungsberichte/Tb141.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 (3.4.2025).
  148. Grieben C & Froböse I (2016). Was hält Lehrkräfte gesund? – Was bewirkt Bewegung? pp. 40-45. In: Forum Schulstiftung (2016). Forum Schulstiftung, 64. Schwerpunkt: Die Gesunde Lehr-Kraft. Zeitschrift für die katholischen freien Schulen der Erzdiözese Freiburg. 26. Jahrgang; pp. 82. ISSN 1611342x.
  149. Wang, X., and Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations. Chest. 158(1S): S65-S71.
  150. Bärebring, L.; Palmqvist, M.; Winkvist, A.; Augustin, H. Gender differences in perceived food healthiness and food avoidance in a Swedish population-based survey: A cross sectional study. Nutr. J. 2020, 19, 140.
  151. Ek, S. Gender differences in health information behaviour: A Finnish population-based survey. Health Promot. Int. 2015, 30, 736–745.
Figure 1. Flow of secondary school teachers‘ and principals‘ study enrolment following vegan, vegetarian, and omnivorous, diets.
Figure 1. Flow of secondary school teachers‘ and principals‘ study enrolment following vegan, vegetarian, and omnivorous, diets.
Preprints 169072 g001
Figure 2. Prevalence (%) of daily fruit and vegetable consumption by diet type (N = 1,350).
Figure 2. Prevalence (%) of daily fruit and vegetable consumption by diet type (N = 1,350).
Preprints 169072 g002
Figure 3. Prevalence (%) of most commonly consumed fluid by kind of diet (N = 1,350).
Figure 3. Prevalence (%) of most commonly consumed fluid by kind of diet (N = 1,350).
Preprints 169072 g003
Figure 4. Prevalence of alcohol consumption and smoking by kind of diet (N = 1,350).
Figure 4. Prevalence of alcohol consumption and smoking by kind of diet (N = 1,350).
Preprints 169072 g004
Table 1. Anthropometrics and sociodemographic distribution of secondary school teachers/ principals across dietary subgroups by sex, teaching level, employment status, and residence.
Table 1. Anthropometrics and sociodemographic distribution of secondary school teachers/ principals across dietary subgroups by sex, teaching level, employment status, and residence.
TOTAL Vegan Vegetarian Omnivorous
N=1,350 2.3% (n=31) 5.2% (n=70) 92.5% (n=1,249)
Age ± SD (years) 45.8 ± 11.4 43.6 ± 10.5 46.0 ± 11.4 45.8 ± 11.4
Sex 1,2 Males
30.3% (n=409)
1.7% (n=7) 2.4% (n=10) 95.8% (n=392)
Females
69.7% (n=941)
2.6% (n=24) 6.4% (n=60) 91.1% (n=857)
Height (cm) 171.2 ± 8.3 172.1 ± 11.6 169.5 ± 7.0 171.3 ± 8.3
Body Weight (kg) 3 71.3 ± 14.6 68.2 ± 21.3 66.5 ± 10.9 71.6 ± 14.5
BMI (kg/m²) 24.2 ± 4.0 22.7 ± 4.3 23.1 ± 3.1 24.3 ± 4.0
Underweight4,5 2.6% (n=35) 12.9% (n=2) 1.4% (n=3) 2.4% (n=30)
Normal weight 63.0% (n=851) 61.3% (n=21) 72.9% (n=86) 62.4% (n=744)
Overweight 25.6% (n=345) 16.1% (n=5) 21.4% (n=20) 26.0% (n=320)
Obese 8.8% (n=119) 9.7% (n=3) 4.3% (n=6) 9.0% (n=110)
Teaching Level Middle School
33.8% (n=456)
2.2% (n=10) 6.6% (n=30)
91.2% (n=416)
High School
46.7% (n=630)
2.1% (n=13) 4.3% (n=411) 93.7% (n=590)
Middle & High School Pooled
19.6% (n=264)
3.0% (n=8) 4.9% (n=13) 92.0% (n=243)
Employment Status Full Time
77.9% (n=1,052)
2.3% (n=24) 4.7% (n=49) 93.1% (n=979)
Part Time
22.1% (n=298)
2.3% (n=7) 7.0% (n=21) 90.6% (n=270)
Residence Urban
37.7% (n=509)
3.3% (n=17) 6.7% (n=34) 90.0% (n=458)
Rural
62.3% (n=841)
1.7% (n=14) 4.3% (n=36) 94.1% (n=791)
Note. Values are prevalences (%), total numbers, and mean ± standard deviation (SD). cm – centimeters; kg – kilograms. Significant difference (p<0.01): 1for omnivorous diet; 2for vegetarian diet; 3between mixed and vegetarian diet; 4between mixed and vegan diet; 5between vegetarian and vegan diet (p<0.01).
Table 2. Dietary motives and lifestyle preferences according to diet type.
Table 2. Dietary motives and lifestyle preferences according to diet type.
TOTAL Vegan Vegetarian Omnivorous
N=1,350 2.3% (n=31) 5.2% (n=70) 92.5% (n=1,249)
Dietary Motives Health
Animal welfare
46.4% (n=627) 48.4% (n=15) 37.1% (n=26) 46.9% (n=586)
4% (n=54) 29% (n=9) 40% (n=28) 1.4% (n=17)
Taste/Preference 22.3% (n=305) 3.2% (n=1) 10% (n=7) 23.8% (n=297)
Environment protection 1.6% (n=22) 12.9% (n=4) 5.7% (n=4) 1.1% (n=14)
Other 6.4% (n=87) 3.2% (n=1) 1.4% (n=1) 6.8% (n=85)
Lifestyle Preferences PA & Exercise 70.8% (n=956) 41.9% (n=13) 31.4% (n=22) 73.7% (n=921)
Sports lifestyle 10.9% (n=147) 3.2% (n=1) 5.7% (n=4) 11.4% (n=142)
Vegetarian diet 7.3% (n=99) 3.2% (n=1) 51.4% (n=36) 5% (n=62)
Vegetarian lifestyle 2.4% (n=32) 3.2% (n=1) 5.7% (n=4) 2.2% (n=27)
Vegan diet 1.1% (n=15) 35.5% (n=11) 4.3% (n=3) 0.1% (n=1)
Vegan lifestyle 0.8% (n=11) 9.7% (n=3) 1.4% (n=1) 0.6% (n=7)
Alcohol 5.9% (n=80) 3.2% (n=1) 4.3% (n=3) 6.1% (n=76)
Smoking 1.3% (n=18) 3.2% (n=1) NA 1.4% (n=17)
Note. Values are prevalences (%) and total numbers. PA – Physical Activity. NA – no answer/not applicable.
Table 3. Prevalence (%) of daily fruit and vegetable consumption by dietary subgroups.
Table 3. Prevalence (%) of daily fruit and vegetable consumption by dietary subgroups.

TOTAL (N=1,350)
Daily Fruit Intake
62.4% (n=842)
Daily Vegetable Intake
72.2% (n=975)
Vegan Vegetarian Omnivorous Vegan Vegetarian Omnivorous
77.4
(n=24)
64.3
(n=45)
61.9
(n=773)
93.5
(n=29)
92.9
(n=65)
70.5
(n=881)
Sex
Male 71.4 50.0 55.1 100 90.0 61.0
Female 79.2 66.7 65.0 91.7 93.3 74.9
Teaching Level
Middle School 80.0 (n=8) 70.0 (n=21) 63.0 (n=262) 90.0 (n=9) 93.3 (n=28) 69.2 (n=288)
High School 76.9 (n=10) 66.7 (n=18) 61.4 (n=362) 92.3 (n=12) 96.3 (n=26) 70.3 (n=415)
Middle & High
School Pooled
75.0 (n=6) 53.8 (n=7) 61.3 (n=149) 100 (n=8) 84.6 (n=11) 73.3 (n=178)
Residence
Urban 76.5 (n=13) 58.8 (n=20) 61.1 (n=280) 100 (n=17) 91.2 (n=31) 73.6 (n=337)
Rural 78.6 (n=11) 69.4 (n=25) 62.3 (n=493) 85.7 (n=12) 94.4 (n=34) 68.8 (n=544)
Employment Status
Full Time 70.8 (n=17) 63.3 (n=31) 59.7 (n=584) 91.7 (n=22) 93.9 (n=46) 68.5 (n=671)
Part Time 100 (n=7) 66.7 (n=14) 70.0 (n=189) 100 (n=7) 90.5 (n=19) 77.8 (n=210)
Note. Values are prevalences (%) and total numbers.
Table 4. Prevalence (%) of alcohol consumption and smoking by kind of diet.
Table 4. Prevalence (%) of alcohol consumption and smoking by kind of diet.

TOTAL (N=1,350)
Alcohol
81.5% (n=1,100)
Smoking
11.0% (n=149)
Vegan Vegetarian Omnivorous Vegan Vegetarian Omnivorous
77.4
(n=25)
64.3
(n=54)
61.9
(n=1,021)
93.5
(n=2)
92.9
(n=4)
70.5
(n=142)
Sex
Male 85.7 80.0 86.7 14.3 20.0 12.5
Female 79.2 76.7 79.5 4.2 3.3 10.9
Teaching Level
Middle School 80.0 (n=8) 76.7 (n=23) 78.6 (n=327) N/A 6.7 (n=2) 13.5 (n=56)
High School 76.9 (n=10) 81.5 (n=22) 85.4 (n=504) 7.7 (n=1) 7.4 (n=2) 11.5 (n=68)
Middle & High
School Pooled
87.5 (n=7) 69.2 (n=9) 78.2 (n=190) 12.5 (n=1) N/A 7.4 (n=18)
Residence
Urban 70.6 (n=12) 85.3 (n=29) 84.3 (n=386) 11.8 (n=2) 2.9 (n=1) 12.2 (n=56)
Rural 92.9 (n=13) 69.4 (n=25) 80.3 (n=635) N/A 8.3 (n=3) 10.9 (n=86)
Employment Status
Full Time 83.3 (n=20) 77.6 (n=38) 82.7 (n=810) 8.3 (n=2) 4.1 (n=2) 11.8 (n=116)
Part Time 71.4 (n=5) 76.2 (n=16) 78.1 (n=211) N/A 9.5 (n=2) 9.6 (n=26)
Note. Values are prevalences (%) and total numbers.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated