Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Photoactive Hydrogels as Materials for Biological Applications Such as Antimicrobial Patches: Preparation of Thermally Stable Photoactive Films

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

16 July 2025

Posted:

18 July 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Hydrogel materials have emerged as an efficient, bioactive, and multifunctional alternative with significant potential for biomedical applications. This work aims to provide a valuable contribution to the design and implementation of stimulus-response films for optical processing and subsequently evaluate the usefulness of the photoactivity of the hydrogel films in photodynamic therapy (PDT) as antimicrobial patches. The design of stimulus-response polymeric hydrogel films is based on a hydrophilic polymer using vinyl monomers, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and acrylamide (AAm) in molar ratios of 1:1 and the photochromic agent 3,3-dimethylindolin-6’-nitrobenzoespiropirano (BSP) for biological applications. The hydrogel films were prepared using the photoinitiator 2-hydroxy-4’-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-2-methylpropiophenone in the presence of a crosslinking agent, N, N’-methylene bisacryl amide (MBA) and BSP as a photoactive agent at different concentrations (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mol.%) to generate photoactive hydrogel films, which were subsequently used in biological photodynamic therapy (PDT). The PDT for Staphylococcus aureus using Ru(bpy) requires concentrations between 4 and 8 µg/mL to fully eliminate methicillin-sensitive strains (MSSA), while only partial inactivation is achieved for methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA). However, the incorporation of Ru(bpy) into a photoactive polymeric film containing the BSP significantly enhances its antimicrobial efficacy, reducing the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to just 2 µg/mL for the complete inactivation of both strains. The new synergistic effect of BSP and Ru(bpy) confirm that these materials hold promise as next-generation antimicrobial coatings and innovative, light-sensitive materials.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Hydrogel materials have become one of the most popular materials depending on their application, such as contact lenses, oil recovery, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, textiles, and adherent materials [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. They have emerged as an efficient bioactive multifunctional alternative [8,9,10,11,12]. These hydrogels can be cross-linked via thermal polymerization [13,14], photopolymerization [15,16], enzymatic crosslinking [17], and several other methods [18].
The crosslinking process can be ionic or covalent and can change a macromolecule into solid or gel material by restricting its mobility [19]. Chemically cross-linked hydrogels are not reversible and have higher mechanical properties [19]. The strength of hydrogels can be attributed to different types of interactions, such as hydrogen bonds [20], ionic bonds [21], hydrophobic bonds [22,23], and hydrophilic bons [24,25].
The physicochemical properties of hydrogels can be easily modified, allowing them to be tailored for various biomedical applications. Hydrogel adhesive patches are widely used for transdermal drug delivery and have also found commercial applications. Beyond transdermal delivery, these hydrogel patches also have applications in cardiac therapy, cancer research, biosensing, and more [26,27,28,29].
Spiropyran is compatible with most polymerization conditions; therefore, it has been used with monomers, such as grafting onto preformed polymer chains. On the other hand, various approaches have been developed for spiropyran-linked polymers. The grafting approach has been employed to functionalize a variety of polymers, including polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) [30], polyaniline [31], polyacrylates [32], polysulfones [33], and polyphosphazenes [34,35].
Spiropyran (SP) is one of the most renowned hydrophobic photochromic compounds, photoisomerized to zwitterionic merocyanine (MC) by UV light irradiation. Merocyanine is then converted back to SP by visible light irradiation or heating. An essential property of MC is its ability to form metal ion complexes. The preparation of honeycomb films containing a photochromic SP moiety and the photopatterning of these films have been previously reported [36,37,38,39].
Therefore, some factors affect hydrogels’ swelling ratio, such as chemical structure and composition of monomers [40,41], network structure [42], crosslinking ratio, and the specific stimuli or the surrounding medium [43,44]. Swelling and absorption properties of these materials are attributed to the presence of hydrophilic groups in the network [40]. For example, PHEMA has been employed in pharmaceutics and biomaterial applications [45,46]. Moreover, injuries caused by adhesive patches pose a significant threat to full-thickness skin trauma, as their strong adhesion can lead to severe pain and exacerbate the injury upon removal.
A work inspired by the mussel has been reported, in which an antibacterial hydrogel adhesive dressing has been designed and fabricated to care for wounds effectively. Unlike most difficult-to-remove dressings, this antibacterial adhesive hydrogel exhibited a substantial adhesion property, enabling painless and noninvasive on-demand removal within 2 seconds. The hydrogel also had excellent protein adsorption and mechanical, antibacterial, and biocompatibility properties [47,48].
In this sense, it is essential to highlight the potential application of these materials in biomedicine, particularly in the context of the rise of infections with bacteria resistant to conventional antimicrobial therapies.
The rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria is one of the most pressing global health threats of the 21st century, significantly reducing the efficacy of current antimicrobial treatments. In the U.S., nearly 23,000 people die each year from antibiotic-resistant infections [49]. As resistance mechanisms continue to accumulate in bacteria, the number of effective therapeutic options steadily declines, underscoring the urgent need for alternative strategies. In this context, novel biomedical materials are being explored to complement conventional antibiotics and reduce MDR-related morbidity and mortality [50]. Among these alternatives, photodynamic therapy (PDT) offers the advantage of localized activation through light-based devices [51]. PDT combines a photosensitizer, oxygen, and light to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), inducing non-specific photo-oxidative stress that inactivates bacteria. One particularly concerning MDR pathogen is Staphylococcus aureus, a Gram-positive bacterium responsible for approximately 30% of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) [52,53,54,55]. MDR S. aureus strains are major contributors to HAIs such as surgical wound infections, urinary tract infections (UTIs), skin infections, and pneumonia [56,57,58,59]. This work aims to contribute to the design and preparation of thermally stable, solvent-resistant, photoactive honeycomb films as an antimicrobial patch for optical processing in biological applications, based on molecular and macromolecular components, and subsequently to evaluate the utility of photoactive polymers in photodynamic therapy (PDT). This work describes the design, synthesis, characterization, and application of a photoactive copolymer hydrogels derived from 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) with acrylamide (AAm) monomers and the organic photosensitive compound 3,3-dimethylindoline-6’-nitrobenzospiropyran (BSP). The active polymeric hydrogel, poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate-co-acrylamide), functionalized with BSP through physical interactions via a polymerization reaction. The optically active photoisomerizable spiropyran chromophore polymer is incorporated into the hydrogel, which is linked through physical interactions via the functional groups of the polymer chain.
Finally, we focused on determining its ability to inhibit the growth of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) as well as an MDR strain, the methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), both of which are the primary cause of superficial infections. This leads to the formation of a solid matrix that, when combined with a photosensitizer, facilitates its use in sanitary pads, hydrogels, or dressings that aid in treating or preventing superficial infections where light can easily activate the photosensitizer. The light-emitting properties of the polymers were characterized by the emission of blue and violet colors when exposed to UV light. They were subsequently used in an assay to verify their antimicrobial properties in photodynamic therapy (PDT). These macromolecular components exhibited an evident photon transfer process; based on this behavior, they were investigated with a photosensitizer molecule for PDT.
The photoactive hydrogel films were initially created using 2-hydroxy-4′-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-2-methylpropiofenone as a photoinitiator and N’N-methylene bisacrylamide (MBA) at different molar percentages as a cross-linking agent, along with 3,3-dimethylindoline-6’-nitrobenzospiropyran (BSP), via free radical polymerization in an aqueous solution. The polymer structure was designed based on a main chain with hydrophilic functional groups, which were functionalized through the incorporation of BSP, allowing these materials to adapt to potential patch applications. This work introduces three significant contributions: (1) the functional groups of the hydrophilic hydrogel were used for functionalization with the photoactive, photochromic agent BSP. The polymer’s functional groups may enable the incorporation of BSP molecules through physical interactions such as hydrogen bonding and van der Waals forces; (2) the photoactive hydrogel films were prepared using a photoinitiator, with an equimolar ratio of monomers, cross-linking agent, and BSP in aqueous solution; and (3) The results indicate that during PDT, concentrations of 4 to 8 µg/mL of the photosensitizer Ru(bpy) are required to achieve complete inactivation of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). In contrast, only a partial reduction in viability is observed for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains. Notably, when the photoactive polymeric film containing the BSP matrix is used, the minimum effective concentration of Ru(bpy) is reduced by half to a quarter, achieving complete bacterial inactivation for both strains at just 2 µg/mL. This demonstrates that the hydrogel film enhances the photodynamic efficacy of the photosensitizer, effectively lowering its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). This improvement is likely due to the synergistic effect of the matrix, which may enhance local retention and stability of the photosensitizer, promote closer contact with bacterial cells, or facilitate more efficient local generation of reactive oxygen species.
Additionally, the material has good mechanical strength, thermal stability, and soft adhesive properties. The structural characterization was performed using FT-IR spectroscopy. Furthermore, the thermal and mechanical properties were measured, and the elastic properties of the hydrogels were quantified through mechanical tests (compressive and shear tests). Thermal analysis using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is carried out.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization

The synthesis conditions of the poly(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP hydrogels and results are shown in Table 1.
Accordingly, poly(HEMA-co-AAm) and copolymer-BSP hydrogels always yielded higher than 90%.

2.2. Structural Characterization by FT-IR Studies of the Hydrogels

Figure 1a,b shows the FTIR spectra of the poly(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP hydrogels at a 1:1 monomer feed ratio with MBA/BSP (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mol.%, respectively). The FTIR spectra for the copolymer and poly(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP reveal changes in signal intensity for the HEMA groups after functionalization with BSP, as seen in Table 2. This can be explained by alterations in the individual peaks of –OH, –NH2, –CONH2, and –NO2 groups. FTIR spectroscopy displayed bands in the range of 3200–3600 cm−1, attributed to the stretching of the hydroxyl (–OH) and –NH deformation of the amide group; at 2847–2948 cm−1, related to –CH stretching of methyl (–CH3) and methylene (–CH2–) groups; the band at 1713 cm-1 corresponds to the –C=O vibration of the ester group from HEMA; at 1665 and 1610 cm-1 attributed to ester groups of BSP; and at 1640–1680 cm-1 (C=O stretching, amide). The band at 1454 and 1422 cm−1 is assigned to the nitro symmetric –NO2 from the BSP moiety, 1335 cm-1 (symmetric stretch Ar-NO2);.1510 cm-1 (asymmetric stretching Ar-NO2); and 1930-1836 cm-1 (Ar-H aromatic overtones). See Figure 1.
Table 2 summarizes the leading vibration bands in the FT-IR spectra for the copolymers with and without BSP functionalization. Absorption bands in the IR spectra of the carbonyl tension bands from HEMA and ester groups have different intensities, which can generally be referred to as strong (s), medium (m), weak (w), broad, and sharp.
This variation in relative intensity of signals can be attributed mainly due to hydrogen bonding interaction between the two polymeric chains with functional BSP groups. The formation of physical attraction forces between hydrophilic functional groups (amide and hydroxyl groups) can significantly impact the intensity variations in an infrared (IR) signal [60], see Figure 2.

2.3. Characterization by TGA and DSC

The TGA analysis of hydrogels at 1:1 feed ratio monomer with 0.1 and 0.5 mol.% MBA and 0.1 and 0.5 mol.% MBA/BSP exhibited similar thermal decomposition, in general presented two-step degradations, see Figure 3a. The hydrogel at 0.5 mol.-% MBA exhibited the highest thermal stability with a residual loss mass percentage of 18% for the hydrogel, with extrapolated thermal decomposition temperatures, such as TDT1 at 261.6 °C and TDT2 at 349.5 °C. The hydrogels presented similar thermal behavior, but exhibited a greater thermal stability for the 0.5 mol.-% MBA in study.
Furthermore, the results obtained from the DSC curve after the 2nd heating showed the formation of amorphous polymers with pronounced glass transition temperatures (Tg) at 0.1 and 0.5 mol.-% MBA and at 0.1 and 0.5 mol.-% MBA/BSP. At the same time, the curve DSC of the hydrogels exhibited a second event during heating, an endothermic peak, indicating the presence of a decomposition reaction (Td) of the material, which confirms the information provided by the TGA analysis. see Figure 3b. On the other hand, the Tg value at 0.1 mol.-% MBA is slightly lower but more pronounced, indicating a greater free volume in the hydrogel cells and greater movements of the functional groups and chains. The Tg value increases at a concentration of 0.5 mol.% MBA and less pronounced, indicating more restricted movements of the chains and functional groups due to the higher percentage of cross-linking. Tg values were found at 119.2 and 121.4 ± 0.1 °C, respectively. The results indicated that the hydrogels exhibit higher Tg value at higher mol.% MBA than for polymer chain [61], influenced by the reticulation reaction [62,63]. On the other hand, in the hydrogels functionalized with BSP, the Tg is not evident, indicating a less flexible system, that is, a more rigid one. The presence of BSP, inserted between the polymer’s backbones, decrease the interaction between these later, and hence decreases the thermal stability of the entirely hydrogel matrix. Additionally, support the result obtained by FTIR and confirms that BSP is in the hydrogel matrix interacting with the polymers, mainly through hydrogen bond interaction.

2.4. Swelling Behavior

Figure 4 shows the swelling behavior of the hydrogels at 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mol.-% MBA/BSP The hydration capacity of poly(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP hydrogels was performed as a function of pH (pH = 3, 7, and 10). The swelling of the hydrogels increased with pH, where the maximum swelling is observed at pH 10. This is attributed to the reinforcement of H-bonding interaction of the carboxylate (-COO-) functional groups with water. In addition, the swelling behavior increased over time; however, it eventually stabilized, achieving equilibrium. On the other hand, the percentage of hydration decreases as the percentage of crosslinking agent increases at 0.5 mol.% of MBA/BSP, as shown in Figure 4, probably due to the higher stiffness of the polymer matrix. It is important to stress that the presence of BSP don’t affects as much as of the crosslinking degree, the swelling behavior of gels.

2.5. Mechanical Properties

The mechanical behavior of the poly(HEMA-co-AAm) hydrogels immersed in water at different feed monomer ratios and percentages of cross-linker MBA (mol.- %) has been studied. The mechanical properties of the hydrogels can be modulated based on the different kinds of technological applications [64,65,66,67]. The stress–strain curves of hydrogels are shown in Figure 4, whereas the Young modulus (E) (kPa) of the hydrogels are summarized in Table 3. The stress curves are plotted until the load applied reached 5 N. The reason is that some of the samples did not show a clear failure point.

Lap Shear Test of Polymeric Hydrogel

Lap shear strength testing measures the ability of a material to withstand stresses set in a plane, where the exerted shear force is moving the two substrates in opposite directions. The test consists of loading a specimen comprising of a 3-ply laminate: substrate/polymer/ substrate.
The hydrogel with feed monomer ratios of 1:1 at 0.1 mol.-% MBA displayed less stiffness but with a lower resistance to failure, see Table 3. Moreover, the hydrogel with 1:1 feed monomer ratios at 0.5 mol.-% MBA sustained higher tension of failure shear, that is, a more excellent shear resistance against the applied force in wet conditions, the failure shear stress increases.
These results indicate that the 1:1 feed monomer ratio at 0.5 mol.% MBA/BSP have higher failure shear stress and exhibit better adhesive properties. It can be suggested that in this study, we designed and synthesized an adhesive hydrogel that relies on dynamic interactions between functional groups and the hydrophilic substrate. Unlike most hydrogels, which can be challenging to remove, this adhesive hydrogel exhibits soft adhesion properties, allowing for the gentle and non-invasive removal of potential patch applications. Table 4 presents some results obtained for biological applications, which are compared with the findings from this work.

2.6. Antimicrobial Properties Based on Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)

Uncontrolled bleeding and infection can lead to significant increases in mortality. Hydrogel sealants have garnered considerable attention for their ability to control bleeding. However, because interfacial water poses a formidable barrier to solid surface bonding, the challenge remains to identify a product that provides robust tissue adhesion while simultaneously offering anti-infective properties.
Inspired by the adhesion mechanism of the biofilm P(HEMA-co-AAm) [71] in the present work, we introduce a novel adhesive hydrogel based on a synthetic P(HEMA-co-AAm) and the photochromic agent, 3,3-dimethylindolin-6’-nitrobenzoespiropirano (BSP), in conjunction with the cross-linker agent MBA through a straightforward radical photopolymerization process. BSP was included in the adhesive polymer to incorporate the properties of both, essential adhesive hydrogel and optical component (BSP), with light UV-Vis stimulus-response properties, respectively. P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BPS displayed adequate adhesion, between 4.34 ± 0.91 and 6.18 ± 1.02 kPa, and excellent antibacterial properties. Therefore, P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP represents a promising class of biomaterials for hemostasis and wound healing with sufficient efficiency. Table 4 presents bioadhesive patches designed for use in wet environments (hemostatic) that have shown limited adhesion to moist tissue surfaces, with an adhesive strength of less than 40 kPa [23,47,68,69,70,71,72]. An ideal bioadhesive for wet conditions should be both rigid and elastic, allowing minimal resistance to the natural deformation of dynamic soft tissues such as skin, which ranges from 0.1 to 100 kPa [73,74].
We first evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the Ru(bpy) photosensitizer (PS) to decrease the viability of S. aureus bacteria. A liquid culture containing 1x107 CFU/mL of S. aureus (both MRSA and MSSA) was exposed to 0 – 8 µg/mL of Ru(bpy) and activated with 17 µW/cm2 of blue light at 450–460 nm for 10 minutes. Figure 5a shows that Ru(bpy) significantly reduces the bacterial viability of MSSA by 6 log10 at 2 µg/mL (p < 0.01). For MRSA at 2 µg/mL, bacterial viability was reduced by 3 log10 (p < 0.05). Higher concentrations of Ru(bpy) significantly reduce the bacterial viability of the MSSA strain, achieving complete inactivation at concentrations ranging from 4 to 8 µg/mL, but not for the MRSA strain.
To preserve the photodynamic properties of the Ru(bpy) photosensitizer when embedded in the photoactive P(HEMA-coAAm)-BSP hydrogel, the matrix was polymerized at the bottom of 24-well plates. The photosensitizer in aqueous solution was then applied as a thin layer over the photoactive hydrogel matrix at concentrations ranging from 0 to 8 µg/mL. The layer was left for 30 minutes to allow the Ru(bpy) photosensitizer to embed into the photoactive hydrogel matrix. S. aureus strains MRSA and MSSA were inoculated onto the matrix at 1 × 107 CFU/mL, incubated in the dark for 10 minutes, and samples were collected. Next, the plate was illuminated with blue light at 17 µW/cm2 at 450–460 nm for 10 minutes to activate the PS, and samples were again collected. As shown in Figure 5b, the photoactive P(HEMA-coAAm)-BSP hydrogel with Ru(bpy), which was not exposed to light, showed no antimicrobial activity compared to the control. Conversely, the irradiated plate showed increased antimicrobial activity, as seen in Figure 5c, achieving complete inactivation of MSSA and MRSA with 2 µg/mL of Ru(bpy), reducing the bacterial viability by 7 log10. This rise in photodynamic activity may be due to the hydrogel matrix’s optical properties. When a photosensitizer in its ground state (S) absorbs light, it transitions to the excited singlet state (1S*). This short-lived state quickly undergoes intersystem crossing with the photoactive hydrogel to form a more stable, longer-lived triplet excited state (3S*). In this state, the photosensitizer can initiate two types of photosensitized oxidation pathways, called type I and type II reactions. In type I pathways, 3S* may participate in electron transfer or, less often, generate radicals or radical ions [75]. These radicals can undergo subsequent electron transfer reactions. In type II pathways, 3S* transfers energy to ground-state molecular oxygen, producing 1O2. Since energy transfer from the triplet sensitizer to triplet oxygen is spin-allowed, it is highly favored in the presence of oxygen, facilitating efficient production of 1O2· [76,77]. Both the radicals from type I reactions and 1O2 generated in type II reactions can oxidize biomolecules. The oxidation of membrane lipids by photosensitization is a key event that can lead to photodynamic cell death.

3. Conclusions

A new series of photoactive polymer hydrogels, designed as materials for biological applications, such as antimicrobial patches in wet environments, has been developed and characterized. Changes in the intensity of the carbonyl peak of functional groups were observed with a with a variation in signal intensities at 1713 cm−1 and 1610 cm−1. This variation in the intensities is attributed mainly to the formation of physical forces attraction between the functional groups and the photoactive active agent generating forces of van der Waals and hydrogen bonds with the amine and the hydroxyl groups.
On the other hand, the hydrogels exhibited high thermal stability, as observed in TGA and DSC analysis. Concerning mechanical properties, these results indicate that the 1:1 feed monomer ratio at 0.5 mol.% MBA/BSP have higher failure shear stress and exhibit better adhesive properties. It can be suggested that in this study, we designed and synthesized an adhesive hydrogel that relies on dynamic interactions between functional groups and the hydrophilic substrate. This result can also be attributed to a certain degree of physical interaction, mainly due to the formation of hydrogen bonds between the –OH functional group.
The ability of this matrix to preserve photodynamic activity was evaluated using the well-known photosensitizer Ru(bpy). Although Ru(bpy) exhibited photodynamic antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, it was significantly effective against the MSSA strain on its own, showing a dose-dependent reduction in bacterial load, which increased in the presence of the photoactive P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP hydrogel. In contrast, the Ru(bpy) efficacy against the MRSA strain was limited, as even higher concentrations of the photosensitizer failed to reduce bacterial viability by more than 4 log10. Notably, when embedded in the photoactive matrix, Ru(bpy) not only retained its photodynamic antimicrobial activity but also demonstrated a marked improvement in efficacy against MRSA. Where the activity of 2 μg/mL significantly increases, reducing bacterial viability by 7 log10, this is comparable to that observed with MSSA. The photoactive P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP hydrogel with Ru(bpy), which was not exposed to light, showed no antimicrobial activity compared to the control. Conversely, the illuminated Ru(bpy) -polymeric matrix complex exhibited increased antimicrobial activity, reducing the viability of MSSA and MRSA.
This approach expands the potential applications of hydrogels as adhesive materials in wet conditions, particularly as biomaterials, with swelling properties suitable for bioinspired applications. This kind of material can be applied in biological areas where low water absorption is needed.

4. Experimental

4.1. Reagents

Chemicals were used without further purification and were of analytical grade. Acrylamide (AAm, Aldrich CHEMIE, Germany) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA, 99% Merck, Germany) were used as the monomers. Benzoyl peroxide (BPO, 99.98 %, Sigma-Aldrich); 1,3,3-Trimethyl-2-methylen-indoline (97%, Sigma-Aldrich); 2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzaldehyde (98 % Sigma-Aldrich), 2,3,3-trimethylindoline, 2-bromoethanol, 2-butanone, trimethylamine, 2-bromoethanol (C2H5BrO, Sigma-Aldrich), 2-butanone (C2H5COCH3, 99.0%, Sigma-Aldrich), all were commercially obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). 2-hydroxy-4′-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-2-methylpropiofenone. (IRGACURE 2959, 99,5%, Merck, Germany) was used as a photoinitiator, and all analytical grades were pure grade. The NN-methylene bisacrylamide (MBA, 99.5% Merck, Germany) was used as a crosslinking agent. All chemicals were used as received without further purification.

4.2. Measurement

The hydrogel samples’ IR spectra were recorded at room temperature through PerkinElmer (USA) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) Spectra 2000 using the attenuated total reflection ATR–FTIR method.
The TGA measurements were carried out at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere with a flow rate: 150 cm3 min-1) by a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA/DSC1 1100 SF, Mettler Toledo, Barcelona, Spain). The hydrogel sample size (between 3-4 ± 0.1 mg) were used in each experiment. The thermal analysis by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was carried out in a nitrogen atmosphere with a DSC Mettler Toledo 822e analyzer. The measurements were carried out at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere with a flow rate: 50 cm3 min-1. All experiments were measure from 25 °C to 550 °C in an inert atmosphere (N2 gas).

4.3. Synthesis of the 3,3-Dimethylindoline-6’-Nitrobenzospiropyran (BSP)

The synthesis was conducted in a 250 mL three-neck flask placed in an oil bath equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a condenser. To the flask, 4 mL (23 mmol) of 1,3,3-trimethyl-2-methylene-indoline and 4 g (23 mmol) of 2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzaldehyde were added in 80 mL of ethanol. The mixture was heated to boiling at 78°C for 5 hours. Upon completion of the reaction, a dark green solid product was obtained, which was filtered and dried on filter paper in an oven for 72 h. The product obtained from the synthesis was purified by crystallization. Solubility tests were conducted using various solvents, including chloroform, ethanol, methanol, and acetone, which indicated that a 1:1 mixture of methanol and acetone showed improved solubility at elevated temperatures. In an Erlenmeyer flask equipped with a heating mantle, 50 mL of the 1:1 methanol and acetone solvent mixture was heated to boiling. The resulting product (solute) was then added, and the solvent mixture was gradually introduced in small amounts until the solid was completely dissolved. The Erlenmeyer flask was wrapped in absorbent paper to allow for slow cooling of the solution. It was covered with a watch glass to facilitate crystallization, which took place over a period of 96 hours. After this time, vacuum filtration was performed, followed by cold methanol washes. The final product obtained was a dark yellow or faintly brown crystalline solid, see Figure 6.

4.4. Hydrogel Films Preparation

The hydrogel films were prepared by free radical polymerization using an equimolar monomer feed ratio 1:1 (HEMA/AAm), in the presence of 2-hydroxy-4′-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-2-methylpropiophenone. (IRGACURE 2959) as photoinitiator, the cross-linker percentage (MBA), as cross-linker agent, and 1,3,3-trimethyl-2-methylene-indoline (BSP) as photochromic agent, based on a procedure previously reported by our group [23]. The polymerization reaction was carried out in aqueous solution using irradiation. A general method is described for 1:1 feed ratio monomer HEMA/AAm, 15 mmol of each monomer (50:50 mol-%), 0.5 mmol-% of IRGACURE 2959, MBA and BSP (at 0.1 and 0.5 mmol-%) were dissolved in 8 mL distilled water and 250 µL aliquot was added into sterile 24-wells cell culture plates. Subsequently, the mixture was exposed to UV radiation for three hours. The Poly(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP hydrogels were maintained sealed to maintain their hydration state. Finally, the dried hydrogels were characterized by Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, thermal properties, swelling behavior, and mechanical properties.

4.5. Swelling Studies

Swelling properties were investigated to develop absorbent polymers with suitable swelling properties for bio-applications.
The initial weight of the hydrogel samples was accurately measured after being freeze-dried. Then, the samples were immersed in a citrate buffer (pH<7) or phosphate buffer (pH >7) at 25°C and were swollen until the equilibrium state was reached. In this way, the dried samples of the copolymers were placed in a solution with a defined pH (3, 7, and 10). After specified time intervals, the swollen hydrogels were weighed after gently removing excess water using filter paper. The swelling ratio is defined using the following equation (Eq.1):
D S ( % ) = W S W d W d × 100
where Ws is the weight of the swollen hydrogel at an equilibrium state, and Wd is the weight of the dried hydrogel (Xerogel).

4.6. Lap Shear Test Studies

The objective of the shear test is to subject samples of the material to a state of shear stress. For this purpose, two portions of hydrogel are positioned between two cavities formed by three sandwiched plates of the assembly accessory. In an idealized way, each sample adopts a parallelepiped geometry with dimensions h=1mm, a=5mm and b= 5mm. Then, the assembly is rested in ambient conditions for 24 and later tested in a Cellscale 5000 biaxial tensile testing machine, equipped with a 10 N load cell, through movement relative between the plates in the longitudinal direction of the assembly. The shear stress in the reference configuration is calculated as τ = V A , where V is the shear force in one of the samples, which, given the double shear configuration, can be calculated as V = F 2 , while A corresponds to the initial cut area A = a b = 25 m m 2 . Furthermore, the tangential deformation is calculated as γ = Δ h , where Δ corresponds to the relative displacement between jaws during the test. The adhesive strength was determined from the maximal loading over the area of the adhesive overlap. For the repeated adhesion tests, a waiting time of 10 min was needed before the next lap-shear cycle [64].

4.7. Determination of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Properties

The methicillin-sensitive MSSA and the methicillin-resistant MRSA Staphylococcus aureus strains were used for the assays. Bacteria were cultured in either solid or liquid Trypticase soy medium, as required. In a liquid medium, bacteria were grown to an optical density of OD600 nm = 0.2–0.4. For photodynamic therapy (PDT), the bacteria were adjusted to 1 × 107 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL in a Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) aqueous solution. The 1 x 107 UFC/mL bacteria were deposited in the wells of the 24-well plate over the P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP hydrogels, with the photosensitizer Ru(bpy) [78] in various concentrations. Excitation was performed in a light box with 17 mW/cm² for 10 min using a blue LED lamp (450–460 nm), equivalent to 61.2 J/cm². After excitation, bacterial viability was determined by broth microdilution and colony counting on plates after 16–20 hours of incubation in Mueller–Hinton medium, as previously described [79]. Bacterial viability was expressed as the mean ± SD in CFU/mL. The MIC of the photosensitizer was determined by mixing 1 × 107 CFU/mL of bacteria with increasing concentrations of the photosensitizer Ru(bpy), between 0 and 8 μg/mL.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.M.; L.A., C.E.P and G.D.P.; methodology, L.A., C.E.P., H.D.C, and G.D.P.; software, L.A. H.D.C.; G.D.P.; resources, J.S. O.G.M and G.D.P.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M.T.; C.E.P. and G.D.P.; writing—review and editing, J.S. O.G.M.; C.E.P. and G.D.P.; visualization, O.G.M., R.M.T. C.E.P and G.D.P.; supervision, O.M., C.E.P and G.D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by FONDECYT grant numbers 1240357, 1231498, and 1241555. They also thank the Project funded by the Research Continuity Project Fund, year 2023, code PY LCLI23-02, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vedadghavami, A.; Minooei, F.; Mohammadi, M. H.; Khetani, S.; Rezaei Kolahchi, A.; Mashayekhan, S.; Sanati-Nezhad, A. Manufacturing of Hydrogel Biomaterials with Controlled Mechanical Properties for Tissue Engineering Applications. Acta Biomater 2017, 62, 42–63. [CrossRef]
  2. Serra, L.; Doménech, J.; Peppas, N. A. Engineering Design and Molecular Dynamics of Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery Systems as Targeting Agents. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. March 2009, pp 519–528. [CrossRef]
  3. Mizrahi, B.; Weldon, C.; Kohane, D. S. Tissue Adhesives as Active Implants; 2010; pp 39–56. [CrossRef]
  4. Mandell, S. P.; Gibran, N. S. Fibrin Sealants: Surgical Hemostat, Sealant and Adhesive. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2014, 14 (6), 821–830. [CrossRef]
  5. Sangeetha, N. M.; Maitra, U. Supramolecular Gels: Functions and Uses. Chem Soc Rev 2005, 34 (10), 821–836. [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, J.; Wang, A. Study on Superabsorbent Composites. IX: Synthesis, Characterization and Swelling Behaviors of Polyacrylamide/Clay Composites Based on Various Clays. React Funct Polym 2007, 67 (8), 737–745. [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, L.; Liu, M.; Rui Liang. Preparation and Properties of a Double-Coated Slow-Release NPK Compound Fertilizer with Superabsorbent and Water-Retention. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99 (3), 547–554. [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.; Chen, G.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, C.; Sun, L.; Zhao, Y. Emerging Functional Biomaterials as Medical Patches. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (4), 5977–6007. [CrossRef]
  9. Hwang, I.; Kim, H. N.; Seong, M.; Lee, S.; Kang, M.; Yi, H.; Bae, W. G.; Kwak, M. K.; Jeong, H. E. Multifunctional Smart Skin Adhesive Patches for Advanced Health Care. Adv Healthc Mater 2018, 7 (15). [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Wang, M.; Yan, L.; Wang, K.; Han, L.; Lu, X. Infant Skin Friendly Adhesive Hydrogel Patch Activated at Body Temperature for Bioelectronics Securing and Diabetic Wound Healing. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (6), 8662–8676. [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, S.; An, S.; Ryu, Y. C.; Seo, S. H.; Park, S.; Lee, M. J.; Cho, S.; Choi, K. Adhesive Hydrogel Patch-Mediated Combination Drug Therapy Induces Regenerative Wound Healing through Reconstruction of Regenerative Microenvironment. Adv Healthc Mater 2023, 12 (18). [CrossRef]
  12. Xie, G.; Zhou, N.; Du, S.; Gao, Y.; Suo, H.; Yang, J.; Tao, J.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, L. Transparent Photothermal Hydrogels for Wound Visualization and Accelerated Healing. Fundamental Research 2022, 2 (2), 268–275. [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, H.; Zhu, D.; Paul, A.; Cai, L.; Enejder, A.; Yang, F.; Heilshorn, S. C. Covalently Adaptable Elastin-Like Protein–Hyaluronic Acid (ELP–HA) Hybrid Hydrogels with Secondary Thermoresponsive Crosslinking for Injectable Stem Cell Delivery. Adv Funct Mater 2017, 27 (28), 1–11. [CrossRef]
  14. Shin, J. Y.; Yeo, Y. H.; Jeong, J. E.; Park, S. A.; Park, W. H. Dual-Crosslinked Methylcellulose Hydrogels for 3D Bioprinting Applications. Carbohydr Polym 2020, 238 (January), 116192. [CrossRef]
  15. Brown, T. E.; Carberry, B. J.; Worrell, B. T.; Dudaryeva, O. Y.; McBride, M. K.; Bowman, C. N.; Anseth, K. S. Photopolymerized Dynamic Hydrogels with Tunable Viscoelastic Properties through Thioester Exchange. Biomaterials 2018, 178, 496–503. [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, Y.; Liang, K.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, C.; Li, J.; Yang, H.; Liu, X.; Yin, X.; Chen, D.; Xu, W.; Xiao, P. Photopolymerized Maleilated Chitosan/Methacrylated Silk Fibroin Micro/Nanocomposite Hydrogels as Potential Scaffolds for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 2018, 108, 383–390. [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, S. H.; Kim, K.; Kim, B. S.; An, Y. H.; Lee, U. J.; Lee, S. H.; Kim, S. L.; Kim, B. G.; Hwang, N. S. Fabrication of Polyphenol-Incorporated Anti-Inflammatory Hydrogel via High-Affinity Enzymatic Crosslinking for Wet Tissue Adhesion. Biomaterials 2020, 242 (January), 119905. [CrossRef]
  18. Wei, Q.; Duan, J.; Ma, G.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Q.; Hu, Z. Enzymatic Crosslinking to Fabricate Antioxidant Peptide-Based Supramolecular Hydrogel for Improving Cutaneous Wound Healing. J Mater Chem B 2019, 7 (13), 2220–2225. [CrossRef]
  19. Mredha, M. T. I.; Pathak, S. K.; Tran, V. T.; Cui, J.; Jeon, I. Hydrogels with Superior Mechanical Properties from the Synergistic Effect in Hydrophobic–Hydrophilic Copolymers. Chemical Engineering Journal 2019, 362, 325–338. [CrossRef]
  20. Oveissi, F.; Naficy, S.; Le, T. Y. L.; Fletcher, D. F.; Dehghani, F. Tough and Processable Hydrogels Based on Lignin and Hydrophilic Polyurethane. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2018, 1 (6), 2073–2081. [CrossRef]
  21. Chang, B.; Ahuja, N.; Ma, C.; Liu, X. Injectable Scaffolds: Preparation and Application in Dental and Craniofacial Regeneration. Materials Science and Engineering R: Reports 2017, 111, 1–26. [CrossRef]
  22. Stojkov, G.; Niyazov, Z.; Picchioni, F.; Bose, R. K. Relationship between Structure and Rheology of Hydrogels for Various Applications. Gels 2021, 7 (4). [CrossRef]
  23. Romero-Gilbert, S.; Castro-García, M.; Díaz-Chamorro, H.; Marambio, O. G.; Sánchez, J.; Martin-Trasancos, R.; Inostroza, M.; García-Herrera, C.; Pizarro, G. del C. Synthesis, Characterization and Catechol-Based Bioinspired Adhesive Properties in Wet Medium of Poly(2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate-Co-Acrylamide) Hydrogels. Polymers (Basel) 2024, 16 (2). [CrossRef]
  24. Ahearne, M.; Yang, Y.; Liu, K. Mechanical Characterisation of Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications. Tissue Eng 2008, 4 (January 2008), 1–16.
  25. Oyen, M. L. Mechanical Characterisation of Hydrogel Materials. International Materials Reviews 2014, 59 (1), 44–59. [CrossRef]
  26. George, B.; Bhatia, N.; Kumar, A.; A., G.; R., T.; S. K., S.; Vadakkadath Meethal, K.; T. M., S.; T. V., S. Bioinspired Gelatin Based Sticky Hydrogel for Diverse Surfaces in Burn Wound Care. Sci Rep 2022, 12 (1), 13735. [CrossRef]
  27. Swain, S.; Pratap Singh, A.; Yadav, R. K. A Review on Polymer Hydrogel and Polymer Microneedle Based Transdermal Drug Delivery System. Mater Today Proc 2022, 61, 1061–1066. [CrossRef]
  28. Carter, P.; Narasimhan, B.; Wang, Q. Biocompatible Nanoparticles and Vesicular Systems in Transdermal Drug Delivery for Various Skin Diseases. Int J Pharm 2019, 555, 49–62. [CrossRef]
  29. Kamei, M.; Matsuo, K.; Imanishi, H.; Hara, Y.; Quen, Y.-S.; Kamiyama, F.; Oiso, N.; Kawada, A.; Okada, N.; Nakayama, T. Transcutaneous Immunization with a Highly Active Form of XCL1 as a Vaccine Adjuvant Using a Hydrophilic Gel Patch Elicits Long-Term CD8+ T Cell Responses. J Pharmacol Sci 2020, 143 (3), 182–187. [CrossRef]
  30. Chung, D.; Ito, Y.; Imanishi, Y. Preparation of Porous Membranes Grafted with Poly(Spiropyran-containing Methacrylate) and Photocontrol of Permeability. J Appl Polym Sci 1994, 51 (12), 2027–2033. [CrossRef]
  31. Bardavid, Y.; Goykhman, I.; Nozaki, D.; Cuniberti, G.; Yitzchaik, S. Dipole Assisted Photogated Switch in Spiropyran Grafted Polyaniline Nanowires. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2011, 115 (7), 3123–3128. [CrossRef]
  32. Moniruzzaman, M.; Sabey, C. J.; Fernando, G. F. Photoresponsive Polymers: An Investigation of Their Photoinduced Temperature Changes during Photoviscosity Measurements. Polymer (Guildf) 2007, 48 (1), 255–263. [CrossRef]
  33. Warshawsky, A.; Kahana, N.; Buchholtz, F.; Zelichonok, A.; Ratner, J.; Krongauz, V. Photochromic Polysulfones. 1. Synthesis of Polymeric Polysulfone Carrying Pendant Spiropyran and Spirooxazine Groups; 1995; Vol. 34. https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines.
  34. Allcock, H. R.; Kim, C. Photochromic Polyphosphazenes with Spiropyran Units. Macromolecules 1991, 24 (10), 2846–2851. [CrossRef]
  35. Raymo, F. M.; Tomasulo, M. Optical Processing with Photochromic Switches. Chemistry – A European Journal 2006, 12 (12), 3186–3193. [CrossRef]
  36. Lewis, S. M.; Harbron, E. J. Photomodulated PPV Emission in a Photochromic Polymer Film. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2007, 111 (11), 4425–4430. [CrossRef]
  37. WANG, S.; YU, C.; CHOI, M.; KIM, S. A Switching Fluorescent Photochromic Carbazole–Spironaphthoxazine Copolymer. Dyes and Pigments 2008, 77 (1), 245–248. [CrossRef]
  38. Tomasulo, M.; Yildiz, I.; Raymo, F. M. Nanoparticle-Induced Transition from Positive to Negative Photochromism. Inorganica Chim Acta 2007, 360 (3), 938–944. [CrossRef]
  39. Zhu, M.-Q.; Zhu, L.; Han, J. J.; Wu, W.; Hurst, J. K.; Li, A. D. Q. Spiropyran-Based Photochromic Polymer Nanoparticles with Optically Switchable Luminescence. J Am Chem Soc 2006, 128 (13), 4303–4309. [CrossRef]
  40. Hamidi, M.; Azadi, A.; Rafiei, P. Hydrogel Nanoparticles in Drug Delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008, 60 (15), 1638–1649. [CrossRef]
  41. Guilherme, M. R.; Reis, A. V.; Takahashi, S. H.; Rubira, A. F.; Feitosa, J. P. A.; Muniz, E. C. Synthesis of a Novel Superabsorbent Hydrogel by Copolymerization of Acrylamide and Cashew Gum Modified with Glycidyl Methacrylate. Carbohydr Polym 2005, 61 (4), 464–471. [CrossRef]
  42. Patachia, S.; Valente, A. J. M.; Baciu, C. Effect of Non-Associated Electrolyte Solutions on the Behaviour of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)-Based Hydrogels. Eur Polym J 2007, 43 (2), 460–467. [CrossRef]
  43. Peppas, N. A.; Bures, P.; Leobandung, W.; Ichikawa, H. Hydrogels in Pharmaceutical Formulations. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2000, 50 (1), 27–46. [CrossRef]
  44. Xiong, Z.C.; He, Ch.C.;Huang, X.; Xu, L.; Zhang, L.F.; Xiong, Ch. Preparation and Properties of Thermo-Sensitive Hydrogels of Konjac Glucomannan Grafted n-Isopropylacrylamide for Controlled Drug Delivery. Iranian Journal of Polymer Science and Technology 2007.
  45. Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Concheiro, A. Reversible Adsorption by a PH- and Temperature-Sensitive Acrylic Hydrogel. Journal of Controlled Release 2002, 80 (1–3), 247–257. [CrossRef]
  46. Elisseeff, L. L. and J. Injectable Hydrogels for Cartilage Tissue Engineering; 2003.
  47. Yang, M.; Tian, J.; Zhang, K.; Fei, X.; Yin, F.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y. Bioinspired Adhesive Antibacterial Hydrogel with Self-Healing and On-Demand Removability for Enhanced Full-Thickness Skin Wound Repair. Biomacromolecules 2023, 24 (11), 4843–4853. [CrossRef]
  48. Khutoryanskiy, V. V. Advances in Mucoadhesion and Mucoadhesive Polymers. Macromol Biosci 2011, 11 (6), 748–764. [CrossRef]
  49. Lahsoune, M.; Boutayeb, H.; Zerouali, K.; Belabbes, H.; El Mdaghri, N. Prévalence et État de Sensibilité Aux Antibiotiques d’Acinetobacter Baumannii Dans Un CHU Marocain. Med Mal Infect 2007, 37 (12), 828–831. [CrossRef]
  50. Magiorakos, A.-P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R. B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M. E.; Giske, C. G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J. F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; Paterson, D. L.; Rice, L. B.; Stelling, J.; Struelens, M. J.; Vatopoulos, A.; Weber, J. T.; Monnet, D. L. Multidrug-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant and Pandrug-Resistant Bacteria: An International Expert Proposal for Interim Standard Definitions for Acquired Resistance. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2012, 18 (3), 268–281. [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Y.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Walsh, T. R.; Yi, L.-X.; Zhang, R.; Spencer, J.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.; Dong, B.; Huang, X.; Yu, L.-F.; Gu, D.; Ren, H.; Chen, X.; Lv, L.; He, D.; Zhou, H.; Liang, Z.; Liu, J.-H.; Shen, J. Emergence of Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance Mechanism MCR-1 in Animals and Human Beings in China: A Microbiological and Molecular Biological Study. Lancet Infect Dis 2016, 16 (2), 161–168. [CrossRef]
  52. Paczosa, M. K.; Mecsas, J. Klebsiella Pneumoniae: Going on the Offense with a Strong Defense. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 2016, 80 (3), 629–661. [CrossRef]
  53. Ko, W.-C. Community-Acquired Klebsiella Pneumoniae Bacteremia: Global Differences in Clinical Patterns. Emerg Infect Dis 2002, 8 (2), 160–166. [CrossRef]
  54. Lakhundi, S.; Zhang, K. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus: Molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 2018, 31 (4). [CrossRef]
  55. Diekema, D. J.; Pfaller, M. A.; Schmitz, F. J.; Smayevsky, J.; Bell, J.; Jones, R. N.; Beach, M. Survey of Infections Due to Staphylococcus Species: Frequency of Occurrence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Isolates Collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific Region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997–1999. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2001, 32 (s2), S114–S132. [CrossRef]
  56. Podschun, R.; Ullmann, U. Klebsiella Spp. as Nosocomial Pathogens: Epidemiology, Taxonomy, Typing Methods, and Pathogenicity Factors. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998, 11 (4), 589–603. [CrossRef]
  57. Nadasy, K. A.; Domiati-Saad, R.; Tribble, M. A. Invasive Klebsiella Pneumoniae Syndrome in North America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007, 45 (3), e25–e28. [CrossRef]
  58. Giulieri, S. G.; Tong, S. Y. C.; Williamson, D. A. Using Genomics to Understand Meticillin- and Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infections. Microb Genom 2020, 6 (1). [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, R.; Wang, F.; Kang, J.; Wang, X.; Yin, D.; Dang, W.; Duan, J. Prevalence of Multidrug Resistant Gram-Positive Cocci in a Chinese Hospital over an 8-Year Period; 2015; Vol. 8. www.ijcem.com/.
  60. Morita, S.; Kitagawa, K.; Ozaki, Y. Hydrogen-Bond Structures in Poly(2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate): Infrared Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Calculations with Model Compounds. Vib Spectrosc 2009, 51 (1), 28–33. [CrossRef]
  61. Morita, S.; Ye, S.; Li, G.; Osawa, M. Effect of Glass Transition Temperature (Tg) on the Absorption of Bisphenol A in Poly(Acrylate)s Thin Films. Vib Spectrosc 2004, 35 (1–2), 15–19. [CrossRef]
  62. Huang, C. W.; Sun, Y. M.; Huang, W. F. Curing Kinetics of the Synthesis of Poly(2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate) (PHEMA) with Ethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate (EGDMA) as a Crosslinking Agent. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem 1997, 35 (10), 1873–1889. [CrossRef]
  63. Singh, N. K.; Lesser, A. J. A Physical and Mechanical Study of Prestressed Competitive Double Network Thermoplastic Elastomers. Macromolecules 2011, 44 (6), 1480–1490. [CrossRef]
  64. Normand, V.; Lootens, D. L.; Amici, E.; Plucknett, K. P.; Aymard, P. New Insight into Agarose Gel Mechanical Properties. Biomacromolecules 2000, 1 (4), 730–738. [CrossRef]
  65. Buckley, C. T.; Thorpe, S. D.; O’Brien, F. J.; Robinson, A. J.; Kelly, D. J. The Effect of Concentration, Thermal History and Cell Seeding Density on the Initial Mechanical Properties of Agarose Hydrogels. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2009, 2 (5), 512–521. [CrossRef]
  66. Chan, E. S.; Lim, T. K.; Voo, W. P.; Pogaku, R.; Tey, B. T.; Zhang, Z. Effect of Formulation of Alginate Beads on Their Mechanical Behavior and Stiffness. Particuology 2011, 9 (3), 228–234. [CrossRef]
  67. Choi, S. S.; Hong, J. P.; Seo, Y. S.; Chung, S. M.; Nah, C. Fabrication and Characterization of Electrospun Polybutadiene Fibers Crosslinked by UV Irradiation. J Appl Polym Sci 2006, 101 (4), 2333–2337. [CrossRef]
  68. Han, W.; Zhou, B.; Yang, K.; Xiong, X.; Luan, S.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Lei, P.; Luo, Z.; Gao, J.; Zhan, Y.; Chen, G.; Liang, L.; Wang, R.; Li, S.; Xu, H. Biofilm-Inspired Adhesive and Antibacterial Hydrogel with Tough Tissue Integration Performance for Sealing Hemostasis and Wound Healing. Bioact Mater 2020, 5 (4), 768–778. [CrossRef]
  69. Kłosiński, K. K.; Wach, R. A.; Girek-Bąk, M. K.; Rokita, B.; Kołat, D.; Kałuzińska-Kołat, Ż.; Kłosińska, B.; Duda, Ł.; Pasieka, Z. W. Biocompatibility and Mechanical Properties of Carboxymethyl Chitosan Hydrogels. Polymers (Basel) 2022, 15 (1), 144. [CrossRef]
  70. Lu, S.; Zhang, X.; Tang, Z.; Xiao, H.; Zhang, M.; Liu, K.; Chen, L.; Huang, L.; Ni, Y.; Wu, H. Mussel-Inspired Blue-Light-Activated Cellulose-Based Adhesive Hydrogel with Fast Gelation, Rapid Haemostasis and Antibacterial Property for Wound Healing. Chemical Engineering Journal 2021, 417, 129329. [CrossRef]
  71. Romero-Gilbert, S.; Díaz-Chamorro, H.; Marambio, O. G.; Sánchez, J.; Martin-Trasancos, R.; Inostroza, M.; García-Herrera, C.; Pizarro, G. del C. Influence of Different Experimental Conditions on Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Synthetic Polymer System Hydrogels for Biological Applications. React Funct Polym 2025, 213, 106264. [CrossRef]
  72. Engler, A. J.; Sen, S.; Sweeney, H. L.; Discher, D. E. Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification. Cell 2006, 126 (4), 677–689. [CrossRef]
  73. Zheng, Y.; Shariati, K.; Ghovvati, M.; Vo, S.; Origer, N.; Imahori, T.; Kaneko, N.; Annabi, N. Hemostatic Patch with Ultra-Strengthened Mechanical Properties for Efficient Adhesion to Wet Surfaces. Biomaterials 2023, 301, 122240. [CrossRef]
  74. Nam, S.; Mooney, D. Polymeric Tissue Adhesives. Chem Rev 2021, 121 (18), 11336–11384. [CrossRef]
  75. Martinez, G. R.; Ravanat, J.-L.; Cadet, J.; Miyamoto, S.; Medeiros, M. H. G.; Di Mascio, P. Energy Transfer between Singlet ( 1 Δ g ) and Triplet ( 3 Σ g - ) Molecular Oxygen in Aqueous Solution. J Am Chem Soc 2004, 126 (10), 3056–3057. [CrossRef]
  76. Greer, A. Christopher Foote’s Discovery of the Role of Singlet Oxygen [ 1 O 2 ( 1 Δ g )] in Photosensitized Oxidation Reactions. Acc Chem Res 2006, 39 (11), 797–804. [CrossRef]
  77. Schmidt, R. Photosensitized Generation of Singlet Oxygen. Photochem Photobiol 2007, 82 (5), 1161–1177. [CrossRef]
  78. Li, F.; Collins, J. G.; Keene, F. R. Ruthenium Complexes as Antimicrobial Agents. Chem Soc Rev 2015, 44 (8), 2529–2542. [CrossRef]
  79. Hormazábal, D. B.; Reyes, Á. B.; Cuevas, M. F.; Bravo, A. R.; Costa, D. M.; González, I. A.; Navas, D.; Brito, I.; Dreyse, P.; Cabrera, A. R.; Palavecino, C. E. Photodynamic Effectiveness of Copper-Iminopyridine Photosensitizers Coupled to Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Against Klebsiella Pneumoniae and the Bacterial Response to Oxidative Stress. Int J Mol Sci 2025, 26 (9), 4178. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. a) FT-IR spectrum of copolymer and P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP, b) Wavenumber ranges 2000-1000 cm-1.
Figure 1. a) FT-IR spectrum of copolymer and P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP, b) Wavenumber ranges 2000-1000 cm-1.
Preprints 168415 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the polymerization reaction of P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP hydrogels.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the polymerization reaction of P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP hydrogels.
Preprints 168415 g002
Figure 3. a) Thermograms and b) DSC curves of P(HEMA-co-AAm) and P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP at 1:1 feed ratio monomer compositions and 0.1 and 0.5 mol.-% MBA and BSP.
Figure 3. a) Thermograms and b) DSC curves of P(HEMA-co-AAm) and P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP at 1:1 feed ratio monomer compositions and 0.1 and 0.5 mol.-% MBA and BSP.
Preprints 168415 g003
Figure 4. Hydration tests of the copolymer P(HEMA-co-AAm) 1:1 ratio with a) 0.1 mol.-% MBA, b) with 0.3 mol.-% MBA/BSP, c) 0.5 mol.-% MBA/BSP.
Figure 4. Hydration tests of the copolymer P(HEMA-co-AAm) 1:1 ratio with a) 0.1 mol.-% MBA, b) with 0.3 mol.-% MBA/BSP, c) 0.5 mol.-% MBA/BSP.
Preprints 168415 g004
Figure 5. The photodynamic antimicrobial activity of the P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP copolymer in combination with the Ru(bpy) photosensitizer. The photodynamic antimicrobial activity against methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant (MRSA) Staphylococcus aureus was assessed: the MIC of the photosensitizer Ru(bpy) was determined between 0 and 8 µg/mL (a), the intrinsic antibacterial activity of P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP was evaluated in the dark (b), and the reduction in MIC for P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP and PS activated by light was assessed by embedding 0 - 8 µg/mL Ru(bpy) in the P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP matrix (c). Bacterial viability is expressed as the log10 of the mean ±SD, with * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 from a two-tailed t-test with comparison to control bacteria in the dark.
Figure 5. The photodynamic antimicrobial activity of the P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP copolymer in combination with the Ru(bpy) photosensitizer. The photodynamic antimicrobial activity against methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant (MRSA) Staphylococcus aureus was assessed: the MIC of the photosensitizer Ru(bpy) was determined between 0 and 8 µg/mL (a), the intrinsic antibacterial activity of P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP was evaluated in the dark (b), and the reduction in MIC for P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP and PS activated by light was assessed by embedding 0 - 8 µg/mL Ru(bpy) in the P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP matrix (c). Bacterial viability is expressed as the log10 of the mean ±SD, with * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 from a two-tailed t-test with comparison to control bacteria in the dark.
Preprints 168415 g005
Figure 6. Reaction scheme for the synthesis of trimethylindoline-6-nitro-spirobenzopyran (BSP).
Figure 6. Reaction scheme for the synthesis of trimethylindoline-6-nitro-spirobenzopyran (BSP).
Preprints 168415 g006
Table 1. Experimental conditions of the synthesis of poly(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP at 1:1 monomer ratios and different molar ratios of MBA and BSP (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mol.%).
Table 1. Experimental conditions of the synthesis of poly(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP at 1:1 monomer ratios and different molar ratios of MBA and BSP (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mol.%).
Feed monomer ratio [AAm]
(mol/g)
[HEMA]
(mol/g)
[MBA]
(mol.-%)
[BSP]
(mol.-%)
Yield (%)
P(HEMA-co-AAm) 1:1 0.015/1.065 0.015/1.950 0.0 0.0 95
P(HEMA-co-AAm) 1:1 0.015/1.065 0.015/1.950 0.1 0.0 90
P(HEMA-co-AAm) 1:1 0.015/1.065 0.015/1.950 0.3 0.0 90
P(HEMA-co-AAm) 1:1 0.015/1.065 0.015/1.950 0.5 0.0 92
P(HEMA-co-AAm) 1:1 0.015/1.065 0.015/1.950 0.1 0.1 90
P(HEMA-co-AAm) 1:1 0.015/1.065 0.015/1.950 0.3 0.3 90
P(HEMA-co-AAm) 1:1 0.015/1.065 0.015/1.950 0.5 0.5 90
Irgacure 2959: 0.019 M; NN-methylene bis-acrylamide cross-linker (MBA).
Table 2. Main vibration bands of the BSP-functionalized copolymers.
Table 2. Main vibration bands of the BSP-functionalized copolymers.
AAm HEMA Ester -NO2
Copolymer (C=O) (C=O) (C=O) -N-O
P(HEMA-co-AAm) 0.1 mol.% MBA 1658 1713 (s) (w) ---
P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP with 0.1 mol.% MBA 1659 (w) 1613 (s) 1454 (s)
P(HEMA-co-AAm) 0.5 mol.% MBA 1656 1713 (s) (w) ---
P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP with 0.5 mol.% MBA 1657 (w) 1610 (s) 1454 (s)
Table 3. Effect of MBA and BSP at 0.1 and 0.5 mol.-% on the mechanical properties of the poly(HEMA-co-AAm) and poly(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP hydrogels at 1:1 feed ratio monomers.
Table 3. Effect of MBA and BSP at 0.1 and 0.5 mol.-% on the mechanical properties of the poly(HEMA-co-AAm) and poly(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP hydrogels at 1:1 feed ratio monomers.
Feed monomer ratio MBA
(mol.-%)
BSP
(mol.-%)
Shear stress
(kPa)
Shear modulus
(kPa)
P(HEMA-co-AAm) 1:1 0.1
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.67 ± 033
1.97 ± 0.25
1.69 ± 0.46
3.33 ± 1.27
P(HEMA-co-AAm)-BSP 1:1 0.1
0.5
0.1
0.5
1.81±0.37
3.41±0.17
4.34 ±0.91
6.18 ±1.02
Table 4. Adhesive hydrogel biofilms and antibacterial abilities.
Table 4. Adhesive hydrogel biofilms and antibacterial abilities.
Polymeric materials Biomedical application Young modulus (E)* References
Hydroxyethyl methacrylate –co-acrylamide with Dopamine Catechol-based bioinspired adhesive properties in a wet medium 33.37±2.74-58.86±2.04 kPa
[23]
Maleic anhydride-modified β-cyclodextrin (CD), amantadine as a competitive guest Adhesive antibacterial hydrogel 37.4-85.8
37.6 kPa
[47]
Chitosan grafted with methacrylate, dopamine, and N-hydroxymethyl acrylamide Biofilm-inspired adhesive antibacterial hydrogel 34.0 kPa [68]
Carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogel Biodegradable carbohydrate polymers 2.3 kPa to 13.3 kPa,
12.5 kPa
[69]
Allyl cellulose with Dopamine Mussel-inspired cellulose-based adhesive hydrogel 38.8 to 40.2 kPa [70]
Hydroxyethyl methacrylate –co-acrylamide with cross-linker (MBA) Biomimetic adhesive hidrogel 1.39 ± 0.06 kPa, 3.85 ± 1.87 kPa [71]
Hydroxyethyl methacrylate with acrylamide, NN-methylene bis-acrylamide (MBA) and photochromic agent (BSP) Photoactive hydrogels as materials for biological applications, such as antimicrobial patches
4.34 ±0.91
6.18 ±1.02 kPa
This work
Tensile and compressive testing.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated