Submitted:
12 July 2025
Posted:
16 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methods
-
a. Requests:In this work, we used the request: ("quantum entanglement" AND "black holes").
-
b. Scientific databases:We utilize databases such as Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science to find 250 articles with textual requests. We found 91 papers with an analysis of Zotero.
-
c. PRISMA:Applying the PRISMA protocol (Preferential Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes) to filter and select articles for analysis. This process led to the selection of 91 articles from an initial set of 250.InterpreterThe provided PRISMA illustrates a systematic and transparent process for selecting studies for review. This is a simple conclusion drawn from the diagram: The systematic review identified 250 articles from various databases. After removing 53 duplicates, 114 articles were screened and 132 were excluded. Of the 95 papers sought for retrieval, 44 were not retrieved. Ultimately, 91 articles were evaluated for eligibility, with 4 excluded for being out of topic. The review included 91 studies. This process ensures that the selection of studies is thorough and unbiased, providing a solid foundation for the systematic review.
-
d. Pre-processing:The centers we offered were centered on quantum mechanics and theoretical physics. The word "entanglement," which is the largest, makes sense in this context. The terms "quantum," "theory," "state," and "physics" are also commonly used, indicating a concentration on ideas associated with quantum states and black holes. Other smaller terms allude to discussions about black holes, spacetime, and particles, such as "hole," "time," "space," and "particle." This word cloud graphically shows the frequency and significance of these SLRs. Is there a specific component of quantum mechanics and black hole physics?
3. Results
3.1. Presentation Corpus
3.2. Analyses by Co-Occurrence:



3.3. Analyses by Co-Authorships



3.4. Statistic Description:
-
a. by years:Interpreter This graph illustrates the development of growing papers over time, indicating a steady increase. Understanding the evolution of data over time, measuring performance, and studying the latest developments could all benefit from this.
-
b. by Sciences databases:InterpreterThis graph illustrates that three distinct database’s papers distribution is visually shown by NVivo. Most of the papers are on "Scopus" much more than on "Webofscience" and "Science Direct". This could indicate that “Scopus” is a more frequently and more extensive database in this regard.
-
c. by References type:InterpreterThe graph shows the distribution of reference types in a database. The pie chart shows that of the references in the databases are of the type "journal Article". indicating the absence of any other types of reference.
-
d. by journal:InterpreterThe graph shows that the most common secondary titles are "Physics Letters B" and "Nuclear Physics B", followed by "Reports on Mathematical Physics". Other titles, such as "International Journal of Modern Physics Letters", "Physical Review B", and "Physical Review Letters", also have a significant number of references. Also shows that there are several titles with a deficient number of references, such as "Journal of Physics A", "New Journal of Physics", and "Quantum Information".




4. Classification Thematic:
| Authors | Problematic | Method | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1: Acquaviva, Giovanni; Iorio, Alfredo; Scholtz, Martin (2017)[1] | General arguments regarding the connection between low-energy theories (gravity and quantum field theory) and a hypothetical fundamental theory of quantum gravity. | Provide a simplistic toy model in which an average loss of information is obtained due to the geometry-field entanglement. | Construct a toy model of black hole evaporation that exhibits partial loss of information and leads to a modification of the Page curve.[1] |
| 2: Adhikari, K.; Choudhury, S.; Chowdhury, S.; Shirish, K.; Swain, A. (2021) | Investigate the quantum circuit complexity and entanglement entropy in the recently studied black hole gas. | Use the two-mode squeezed states formalism written in arbitrary dimensional spatially flat cosmological Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker background space-time[2]. | Conclude that circuit complexity can be used as a useful tool to discover the underlying features of a model that are otherwise difficult to analyze. |
| 3: Afrasiar, M.; Basak, J.K.; Chandra, A.; Sengupta, G. (2024) | Computed the reflected entropy for various bipartite mixed states described by adjacent and disjoint subsystems at a finite temperature for the communicating black hole configurations in a Planck brane world geometry[3]. | Utilize the method discussed in configuration-13 of the adjacent subsystems to compute the EWCS in this configuration described in Fig.9a for the disjoint subsystems A and B. | Field theory replica technique results were substantiated by explicit bulk holographic computation of the EWCS in the dual brane world geometry. |
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
- Acquaviva, Giovanni, Alfredo Iorio, et Martin Scholtz. 2017. « On the implications of the Bekenstein bound for black hole evaporation ». Annals of Physics 387 (décembre):317-33. [CrossRef]
- Adhikari, K., S. Choudhury, S. Chowdhury, K. Shirish, et A. Swain. 2021. « Circuit Complexity as a Novel Probe of Quantum Entanglement: A Study with Black Hole Gas in Arbitrary Dimensions ». Physical Review D 104 (6). [CrossRef]
- Afrasiar, M., J.K. Basak, A. Chandra, et G. Sengupta. 2024. « Reflected Entropy for Communicating Black Holes II: Planck Braneworlds ». European Physical Journal C 84 (3). [CrossRef]
- Kupczynski, M. 2016. « EPR Paradox, Quantum Nonlocality and Physical Reality ». Journal of Physics: Conference Series 701 (mars):012021. [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim Akal, Taishi Kawamoto, Shan-Ming Ruan, Tadashi Takayanagi, and Zixia Wei. Page curve under final state projection. Physical Review D, 105(12):126026, 2022.
- brahim Akal, Yuya Kusuki, Noburo Shiba, Tadashi Takayanagi, and Zixia Wei. Entanglement entropy in a holographic moving mirror and the Page curve. Physical Review Letters, 126(6):061604, 2021.
- Ali Akil, Oscar Dahlsten, and Leonardo Modesto. Conditional entanglement transfer via black holes: restoring predictability. New Journal of Physics, 23(11):113011, 2021.
- Jeffrey A. Steidle, Michael L. Fanto, Christopher C. Tison, Zihao Wang, Stefan F. Preble, and Paul M. Alsing. High spectral purity silicon ring resonator photon-pair source. In Quantum Information and Computation XIII, volume 9500, pages 252–256, 2015. SPIE.
- R. Aoude and M.Z. Chung. Y.-t. Huang, C.S. Machado and M.-K. Tam. Silence of Binary Kerr Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett, 125:181602, 2020.
- Erik Aurell, Lucas Hackl, Paweł Horodecki, Robert H. Jonsson, and Mario Kieburg. Random pure Gaussian states and Hawking radiation. Physical Review Letters, 133(6):060202, 2024.
- Vijay Balasubramanian, Micha Berkooz, Simon F. Ross, and Joan Simón. Black holes, entanglement and random matrices. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 31(18):185009, 2014.
- Vijay Balasubramanian, Patrick Hayden, Alexander Maloney, Donald Marolf, and Simon F. Ross. Multiboundary wormholes and holographic entanglement. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 31(18):185015, 2014.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).