Submitted:
10 July 2025
Posted:
11 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Background
2.1. Stunting in Ethiopia
2.2. Role of Maize in Ethiopian Diets
2.3. Types of Specialty Maize
- Quality Protein Maize (QPM): Engineered to contain higher levels of lysine and tryptophan two essential amino acids deficient in regular maize QPM significantly improves protein quality and biological value, especially for growing children (Gunaratna et al., 2010; Vivek et al., 2008).
- Provitamin A Maize: This variety is biofortified with β-carotene, a precursor of vitamin A, to help combat vitamin A deficiency, which is widespread among Ethiopian children and contributes to growth retardation, vision problems, and weakened immunity (Saltzman et al., 2013; Tanumihardjo et al., 2020).
- Zinc-Enriched Maize: Zinc plays a critical role in cell division, immune response, and growth. Zinc-biofortified maize has been developed to reduce the prevalence of zinc deficiency-related stunting, especially in regions where soil and dietary zinc availability is low (Andersson et al., 2017; Koç et al., 2022).
3. Objectives
- ➢
- To review evidence on the effectiveness of specialty maize in improving child nutrition.
- ➢
- To examine the role of specialty maize in reducing under-five stunting in Ethiopian maize-growing areas.
- ➢
- To identify implementation challenges and potential policy solutions.
- ➢
- To provide recommendations for scaling dietary interventions using specialty maize.
4. Methodology
5. Results and Discussion
5.1. Nutritional Impact

- ➢
- QPM (Quality Protein Maize) shows the highest improvement in linear growth (12%) and a notable 7% impact on nitrogen retention and immunity, due to its enriched lysine and tryptophan content.
- ➢
- Provitamin A Maize significantly boosts immunity (10%) by increasing serum retinol levels and reducing infection rates, with an estimated 8% contribution to growth.
- ➢
- Zinc-Enriched Maize has moderate effects on both growth (6%) and immunity (6%), especially when consumed with phytate-reducing preparation methods (e.g., fermentation or soaking) to enhance zinc bioavailability.
| No | Nutrient | Conventional Maize | Quality Protein Maize (QPM) | Provitamin A Maize | Zinc-Enriched Maize |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Protein (g) | 8.5 | 10.0–11.0 | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| 2 | Lysine (g) | 0.26 | 0.40–0.45 | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| 3 | Tryptophan (g) | 0.06 | 0.08–0.09 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| 4 | Provitamin A (µg RE) | < 20 | < 20 | 600–1500 | < 20 |
| 5 | Zinc (mg) | 1.5–2.5 | 1.5–2.5 | 1.5–2.5 | 3.5–4.5 |
| 6 | Iron (mg) | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 |
| 7 | Energy (kcal) | 365 | 370 | 370 | 370 |
| 8 | Fat (g) | 4.7 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 9 | Carbohydrates (g) | 74 | 72 | 72 | 72 |
| 10 | Fiber (g) | 7.3 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 |
5.2. Ethiopian Context
| No | Region | Type of Specialty Maize | Delivery Approach | Observed Outcomes | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oromia | Quality Protein Maize (QPM) | School feeding, demos, caregiver training | Improved child HAZ and weight gain | Abate et al. (2021) |
| 2 | Amhara | Provitamin A Maize | Agricultural demos, household use | Increased vitamin A intake and reduced illness episodes | HarvestPlus (2022) |
| 3 | SNNPR | Zinc-Enriched Maize | Household trials, nutrition education | Moderate improvements in growth and reduced morbidity | EIAR Reports (2022) |
5.3. Synergy with Other Interventions
6. Challenges and Limitations
- ∗
-
Low adoption rates among smallholder farmers due to seed cost and awareness:Many smallholder farmers face financial constraints that make purchasing biofortified maize seeds, which tend to be more expensive than conventional seeds, difficult. Additionally, limited awareness about the nutritional benefits and availability of these seeds means farmers may not prioritize or trust adopting them. Without proper knowledge and affordable access, adoption remains low.
- ∗
-
Cultural preferences for white maize hinder acceptance of orange (PVA) maize:In many maize-consuming communities, especially in parts of Africa, white maize is traditionally preferred for its taste, texture, and cultural significance. Orange maize varieties, biofortified with provitamin A (PVA), differ in color and sometimes flavor, leading to resistance or reluctance among consumers to switch from their customary white maize, even when orange maize has superior nutritional benefits.
- ∗
-
Limited processing knowledge to reduce phytates and enhance mineral bioavailability:Phytates are natural compounds in maize that bind minerals like iron and zinc, reducing their absorption in the human body. Proper traditional or improved processing methods—such as soaking, fermentation, or germination—can reduce phytate levels and increase mineral bioavailability. However, limited knowledge or adoption of these processing techniques means that the nutritional potential of biofortified maize is not fully realized.
- ∗
-
Insufficient monitoring of nutritional outcomes post-introduction of biofortified maize:After introducing biofortified maize varieties, it is crucial to track and evaluate their actual impact on nutritional status among target populations. However, there often is a lack of systematic monitoring and evaluation to measure improvements in vitamin A status or reductions in micronutrient deficiencies. This gap hinders understanding of the effectiveness of biofortification programs and limits evidence-based scaling
7. Policy Implications
- [1]
-
Integrate specialty maize into Ethiopia’s Food and Nutrition Strategy:Incorporating specialty maize such as quality protein maize (QPM) or provitamin A (PVA) maize into the national food and nutrition policies ensures it receives priority attention and funding. This integration aligns biofortified crops with broader goals to reduce malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies, creating a coordinated framework for promotion, adoption, and impact measurement across regions.
- [2]
-
Promote public–private partnerships to produce and distribute affordable certified seeds:Collaborations between government agencies, private seed companies, and non-governmental organizations can improve the production and supply chains of biofortified maize seeds. These partnerships help scale seed availability, reduce prices through competition and subsidies, and enhance quality control, making seeds accessible and affordable for smallholder farmers.
- [3]
-
Train extension workers and caregivers on preparation techniques and nutrition education:Capacity building for agricultural extension agents and community caregivers is critical to ensure proper agronomic practices, seed handling, and post-harvest processing. Nutrition education empowers caregivers to understand the benefits of specialty maize and prepare it in ways that maximize nutrient retention and bioavailability, thus increasing consumer acceptance and health outcomes.
- [4]
-
Link specialty maize to school feeding programs and Productive Safety Net Programs (PSNP):Integrating specialty maize into institutional programs like school meals and PSNP provides a reliable market for farmers and ensures vulnerable populations benefit directly from improved nutrition. This linkage not only boosts demand and production but also supports social protection objectives by delivering nutrient-rich food to children and food-insecure households.
8. Future Recommendations
- ✓
- Investing in multi-nutrient maize varieties (e.g., QPM + PVA + zinc) is essential to comprehensively tackle multiple micronutrient deficiencies prevalent in Ethiopia. Breeding programs should prioritize developing maize lines that combine enhanced protein quality, provitamin A content, and essential minerals like zinc, thereby providing a broader spectrum of nutritional benefits in a single crop. This approach can maximize impact on child growth, immune function, and overall health (Bouis & Saltzman, 2017).
- ✓
- Conducting region-specific trials on feeding behavior, acceptability, and impact ensures that biofortified maize varieties meet local preferences and dietary habits. Since cultural tastes, cooking methods, and environmental conditions vary widely between highland and lowland areas, these trials provide critical data to optimize variety selection and deployment strategies, increasing adoption and effectiveness (Kassie et al., 2020).
- ✓
- Strengthening community seed banks plays a pivotal role in improving access to quality seeds among smallholder farmers, especially in remote or resource-poor areas. Seed banks facilitate local seed saving, exchange, and rapid distribution, which enhances seed security and farmer autonomy, contributing to sustained adoption of specialty maize (McGuire & Sperling, 2016).
- ✓
- Developing agronomic packages tailored for maize-growing highlands and lowlands addresses the diverse agroecological conditions in Ethiopia. Customized recommendations on planting time, fertilizer use, pest and disease management, and soil fertility interventions help optimize crop performance, yield stability, and nutrient content across varying environments (Tadesse et al., 2021).
- ✓
- Encouraging processing technologies that reduce antinutrients and preserve bioavailability such as fermentation, soaking, and germination can significantly improve the nutritional value of maize-based foods by lowering phytate levels and enhancing mineral absorption. Training farmers and processors on these methods ensures that the full benefits of biofortification translate into improved health outcomes (Gibson et al., 2010).
9. Summary and Conclusion
Acknowledgment
Conflict of Interest
References
- Abate, T., Shiferaw, B., Menkir, A., Wegary, D., Kebede, Y., Tesfaye, K., ... & Worku, M. (2015). Factors that transformed maize productivity in Ethiopia. Food Security, 7(5), 965–981. [CrossRef]
- Abate, T., Kebede, Y., & Tadesse, A. (2021). Effects of quality protein maize on child growth outcomes in Ethiopia: Evidence from community-based trials. African Journal of Food and Nutrition Development, 21(2), 17653–17671. [CrossRef]
- Andersson, M. S., Saltzman, A., Virk, P. S., & Pfeiffer, W. H. (2017). Progress update: Crop development of biofortified staple food crops under HarvestPlus. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 17(2), 11905–11935.
- Arimond, M., & Ruel, M. T. (2004). Dietary diversity is associated with child nutritional status: Evidence from 11 demographic and health surveys. The Journal of Nutrition, 134(10), 2579–2585. [CrossRef]
- Awasthi, S., Peto, R., Read, S., Clark, S., Pande, V., Bundy, D., & DEVTA Team. (2013). Population deworming every 6 months with albendazole in 1 million pre-school children in north India: DEVTA, a cluster-randomised trial. The Lancet, 381(9876), 1478–1486. [CrossRef]
- Bouis, H. E., & Saltzman, A. (2017). Improving nutrition through biofortification: A review of evidence from HarvestPlus, 2003 through 2016. Global Food Security, 12, 49–58. [CrossRef]
- Black, R. E., Victora, C. G., Walker, S. P., Bhutta, Z. A., Christian, P., de Onis, M., ... & Uauy, R. (2013). Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet, 382(9890), 427–451. [CrossRef]
- CSA [Central Statistical Agency] & ICF. (2021). Ethiopia Mini Demographic and Health Survey 2019. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: CSA and ICF.
- Dangour, A. D., Watson, L., Cumming, O., Boisson, S., Che, Y., Velleman, Y., ... & Uauy, R. (2013). Interventions to improve water quality and supply, sanitation and hygiene practices, and their effects on the nutritional status of children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (8), CD009382. [CrossRef]
- EIAR [Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research]. (2022). Annual Report on Specialty Maize Interventions in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: EIAR.
- FAOSTAT. (2022). FAO Statistics Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/.
- Gannon, B., Kaliwile, C., Arscott, S. A., Schmaelzle, S., Chileshe, J., Kalungwana, N., ... & Tanumihardjo, S. A. (2014). Biofortified orange maize is as efficacious as a vitamin A supplement in Zambian children even in the presence of high liver reserves of vitamin A: A community-based, randomized placebo-controlled trial. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 100(6), 1541–1550. [CrossRef]
- Gibson, R. S., Bailey, K. B., Gibbs, M., & Ferguson, E. L. (2010). A review of phytate, iron, zinc, and calcium concentrations in plant-based complementary foods used in low-income countries and implications for bioavailability. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 31(2_suppl2), S134–S146. [CrossRef]
- Gunaratna, N. S., de Groote, H., Nestel, P., Pixley, K. V., & McCabe, G. P. (2010). A meta-analysis of community-based studies on quality protein maize. Food Policy, 35(3), 202–210. [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S., Sen, D., & Rao, P. (2021). Nutritional and functional attributes of biofortified maize: A review. Journal of Cereal Science, 99, 103186. [CrossRef]
- HarvestPlus. (2020). Biofortification Priority Index (BPI) – 2020 Global Update. Washington, DC: HarvestPlus.
- HarvestPlus. (2022). Annual Performance Report – Ethiopia. Washington, DC: HarvestPlus.
- HarvestPlus. (2023). Unlocking the Power of Biofortified Maize in Ethiopia: Strategic Pathways. Washington, DC: HarvestPlus.
- Hotz, C., & Gibson, R. S. (2007). Traditional food-processing and preparation practices to enhance the bioavailability of micronutrients in plant-based diets. The Journal of Nutrition, 137(4), 1097–1100. [CrossRef]
- Humphrey, J. H. (2009). Child undernutrition, tropical enteropathy, toilets, and handwashing. The Lancet, 374(9694), 1032–1035. [CrossRef]
- Kassie, M., Jaleta, M., Mutenje, M., & Erenstein, O. (2020). Agricultural technology adoption and rural poverty: Application of an endogenous switching regression using panel data from Ethiopia. World Development, 129, 104923. [CrossRef]
- Koç, R., Şimşek, M., & Demirbas, A. (2022). Zinc biofortification in maize and its potential to improve public health: A review. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 77, 34–44.
- Leroy, J. L., Olney, D., & Ruel, M. (2015). PROCOMIDA, a food-assisted integrated health and nutrition program, contributes to improved child growth in Guatemala: A cluster-randomized controlled intervention trial. The Journal of Nutrition, 145(5), 1023–1030.
- Martorell, R., & Young, M. F. (2012). Patterns of stunting and wasting: Potential explanatory factors. Advances in Nutrition, 3(2), 227–233. [CrossRef]
- Mbuya, M. N. N., & Humphrey, J. H. (2016). Preventing environmental enteric dysfunction through improved water, sanitation and hygiene: An opportunity for stunting reduction in developing countries. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 12(S1), 106–120. [CrossRef]
- McGuire, S., & Sperling, L. (2016). Seed systems smallholder farmers use. Food Security, 8, 179–195. [CrossRef]
- Muthayya, S., Rah, J. H., Sugimoto, J. D., Roos, F. F., Kraemer, K., & Black, R. E. (2013). The global hidden hunger indices and maps: An advocacy tool for action. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e67860. [CrossRef]
- Ngure, F. M., Reid, B. M., Humphrey, J. H., Mbuya, M. N., Pelto, G., & Stoltzfus, R. J. (2014). Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), environmental enteropathy, nutrition, and early child development: Making the links. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1308(1), 118–128. [CrossRef]
- Pixley, K., Rojas, N. P., Babu, R., Mutale, R., Surles, R., & Simpungwe, E. (2013). Biofortification of maize with provitamin A carotenoids. In C. T. John & R. O. Nathan (Eds.), Carotenoids and Human Health (pp. 271–292). Springer. [CrossRef]
- Prasanna, B. M., Cairns, J. E., & Zaidi, P. H. (2022). Maize for food security in Sub-Saharan Africa: Changing landscapes and priorities. Global Food Security, 33, 100635.
- Saltzman, A., Birol, E., Bouis, H. E., Boy, E., De Moura, F. F., Islam, Y., & Pfeiffer, W. H. (2013). Biofortification: Progress toward a more nourishing future. Global Food Security, 2(1), 9–17. [CrossRef]
- Tadesse, T., Alemu, T., & Admassie, Y. (2021). Optimizing maize productivity under different agro-ecological conditions in Ethiopia: Agronomic practices and climate-smart strategies. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31(2), 112–125.
- Tanumihardjo, S. A., Bouis, H. E., Hotz, C., Meenakshi, J. V., & McClafferty, B. (2020). Biofortified crops for improved nutrition and health: A review of recent evidence. Global Food Security, 25, 100331.
- UNICEF. (2023). The State of the World’s Children 2023: For Every Child, Nutrition. New York: UNICEF.
- Victora, C. G., de Onis, M., Hallal, P. C., Blössner, M., & Shrimpton, R. (2008). Worldwide timing of growth faltering: Revisiting implications for interventions. Pediatrics, 125(3), e473–e480. [CrossRef]
- Victora, C. G., Christian, P., Vidaletti, L. P., Gatica-Domínguez, G., Menon, P., & Black, R. E. (2021). Revisiting maternal and child undernutrition in low-income and middle-income countries: Progress, setbacks, and emerging priorities. The Lancet, 397(10282), 1388–1399. [CrossRef]
- Vivek, B., Krivanek, A. F., Palacios-Rojas, N., Twumasi-Afriyie, S., & Diallo, A. O. (2008). Breeding Quality Protein Maize (QPM): Protocols and methods. CIMMYT. https://repository.cimmyt.org.
- WHO. (2020). Soil-transmitted helminth infections. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/soil-transmitted-helminth-infections.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
