Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

An Effect of a Matrix Made of Cell Wall Polysaccharides from Apple on the Rheological Properties of Various Food Products

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

09 July 2025

Posted:

10 July 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
A texture-modifying food matrix (MPS) was obtained by micronizing apple cell polysac-charides and adding spray-dried low-methoxy pectins. This study aimed to demonstrate the effect of MPS addition on a versatile group of products, including instant soup, salad dressing, buttermilk, tomato juice, apple juice, and instant kissel. The rheological proper-ties of suspensions with two MPS concentrations added to these products were compared with those of the control. Additionally, the water holding and retention capacity, swelling capacity, and wetting angles of the MPS and its components were characterized to deter-mine the technological properties of these products. Results show that the MPS propor-tionally increases viscosity and the thixotropic effect of all studied products, except but-termilk, in relation to concentration. In particular, very pronounced effects were obtained for apple, tomato juice, and salad dressing. All studied suspensions were classified as pseudoplastic fluids; the addition of MPS resulted in varying changes in pseudoplasticity, depending on the product. In summary, this study showed that MPS, as a natural and rich source of dietary fibre matrix, effectively alters rheological properties and may there-fore be considered a substitute for other food additives currently used in the food industry.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Nowadays, food additives are commonly used as ingredients, improving many properties of food products. On the one hand, food additives are used to modify foodstuffs and provide convenience in preparation; on the other hand, they are expected to preserve the natural taste, color, and texture of food. Food texture modifiers are widely studied and described in terms of technological, chemical, and sensory properties, as well as from a rheological perspective [1].
Food additives, according to Codex Alimentarius terminology, are defined as all substances that are generally not consumed separately and are not typically used as ingredients in food products [2]. Consumers usually prefer food products that are free from additives or contain additives of natural origin [3]. Since dietary fibre is of natural origin and has proven health benefits, its chemical and physical properties, such as the ability to swell with water, increase the viscosity of the medium, and form gels, have been intensively studied to improve the quality of food products. Therefore, dietary fibre, also made of by-products or waste material from fruit and vegetable processing, can be used as a food texture modifier [4].
Dietary fibre is composed of plant cell wall polysaccharides, i.e., pectin, cellulose, and hemicelluloses. According to the definition, dietary fibre also consists of lignin, phenolic compounds, waxes, saponins, phytates, cutin, phytosterols, if they are closely related to cell wall polysaccharides and extracted with them as a fraction of dietary fiber [5]. However, even though these compounds (except lignin) are highly associated with the cell wall, if they are isolated from cell wall polysaccharides, they lose their importance as components of dietary fibre [6]. The technological and physiological properties of dietary fibre depend primarily on its ability to bind water and mechanisms of water holding and retention [7]. The chemical composition, particularly the proportions between soluble and insoluble fractions [8], and microstructural characteristics [7,9] influence the functionality of fibre-based food additives. Dietary fibre-rich products often require rehydration in technological processes; their reconstitution ability is a crucial functional property for agile manufacturing [9]. Soluble dietary fibre fractions facilitate the gelling properties of food products while also enabling optimal gut microbiome balance, possessing prebiotic potential [10]. Insoluble dietary fiber, with its strong hydration properties, has been recognized as beneficial for intestinal health [11]; however, numerous processing methods have been applied to reduce the particle size of this fraction and increase the availability of its components [7,12]. Since dietary fibre has been proven to have health benefits, the challenge and goal are to utilize dietary fibre polysaccharides as a functional food additive [8,13]. Recently, a new food additive made of cell wall polysaccharide matrix from apple pomace (MPS) was developed [14]. A brief description of this technology is presented in the Materials and Methods section. A function of MPS was demonstrated in water solutions with the presence of metal ions. It was shown that MPS has a gelling capability, which is attributed to the micronization of cell wall material and the presence of spray-dried low-methoxyl pectins. Considering that MPS is rich in dietary fibre and would replace currently used texture modifiers, there is a need to test the performance of MPS for changing the rheological properties of real food systems.
This study aimed to demonstrate the extent of changes in the rheological properties of versatile food products, including instant soup, salad dressing, buttermilk, tomato juice, apple juice, and instant kissel, after the addition of MPS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Modified Cell Wall Polysaccharide Matrix (MPS) from Apples

Modified cell wall polysaccharide matrix (MPS) was prepared from apple pomace [14,15]. Pomace from apples purchased from local market was prepared using de-pulping machine with a double screw shredder (Twin Gear Juice Extractor, Green Star Elite GSE-5000). After drying pomace in a fluidized spray dryer [16] and micronizing it to a particle size of 50–100 µm, the material, designated as S2, was obtained. The prepared S2 material was then stirred with isopropyl alcohol and homogenized using an ultrasonic processor (Sonics, USA) for 2 × 30 minutes, at a frequency of 20 kHz and an amplitude of 57 µm. Suspended S2 was filtered, stirred with 70% ethanol, and mixed with a magnetic stirrer. The sample was stirred with ethanol three times to remove sugars from the S2 material. Desugared S2 was then used for pectin extraction in citric acid. Pectin extraction was conducted in a citric acid solution (pH 2.5) for 30 minutes at 97°C, with a ratio of S2 to solution of 1:50. The residues separated during filtration were freeze-dried and labeled as S2L, while the filtrate was concentrated using an evaporator and adjusted to pH 4.5 with aqueous ammonia. After pectin precipitation with isopropyl alcohol, the obtained polysaccharides were de-esterified with potassium carbonate (DM = 37%). Low-esterified pectins were precipitated with ethanol, and after drying at 40°C, an aqueous solution of apple pectin (AP) was spray dried in a laboratory fluidized spray dryer [16]. The obtained apple pectin spray dried was marked as APS. Prepared two components – S2L and APS were mixed in the experimentally optimized ratio of 2:3 to get the final product, polysaccharide matrix MPS.

2.2. Water Retention Capacity

Water retention capacity (WRC) was defined as the amount of water bound to the hydrated fiber when an external force was applied [17]. To 1 g of sample, 30 ml of water was added, gently mixed, and hydrated for 20 hours, followed by centrifugation (6000 x g; 20 min). The supernatant was removed by filtering through a nylon membrane (0.20 μm). The weight of the hydrated residue was recorded, and the sample was then dried at 105°C for 6 hours to a dry mass. WRC was calculated according to the following equation:
WRC[g/g] = hydrated sample weight after centrifugation – sample dry weight/sample dry weight

2.3. Water Holding Capacity

Water holding capacity (WHC) was defined as the amount of water bound to the fibers without the application of an external force [18]. To 1 g of the sample, 30 mL of water was added, gently mixed, and allowed to hydrate for 20 hours. The supernatant was then removed by filtration through a nylon membrane (0.20 μm). The weight of the hydrated sample was recorded, and then the sample was dried at 105°C for 6 hours to obtain a dry mass. WHC was calculated according to the following equation:
WHC [g/g] = hydrated sample weight – sample dry weight/sample dry weight

2.4. Swelling Capacity

The swelling capacity (SC) was defined as the ratio of the volume occupied by a sample immersed in excess water after equilibration to its actual weight [18]. To the 0.4 g of sample in the tube, 10 ml of water was added, mixed, and allowed to hydrate for 20 h. Then, the final volume of the sample was measured. SC was calculated according to the following equation:
SC [mL/g] = hydrated sample volume/ original sample weight

2.5. Measurements of Wetting Angles

The wetting angles were measured using an optical goniometer. Due to the dynamic nature of the wetting process, an image sequence was recorded for each sample at a frequency of 3.75 frames per second. Images of drops of wetting liquid were recorded using the DFK 51BU02.H CCD camera (Imaging Source Europe GmbH). Deionized water was used as a wetting liquid. The measurements took place at room temperature. Water drops were deposited on the flat surface of the cylindrical samples using a laboratory pipette with a 100 µl capacity. All the droplets were released from a height of 1 cm above the surface.
Measurements of the wetting angle required manual determination of the baseline for each sample. The baseline was determined by selecting the two points at the edge of the drop, where the drop was in contact with the sample surface. Then, using the least squares algorithm, an ellipse was fitted to the edge points of the deposited drop [19]. The wetting angle was calculated as the angle between the baseline and the tangent to the ellipse at the intersection points of the baseline with the ellipse. Left- and right-hand contact angle values were measured separately and then averaged for further analysis.
Wetting angles calculated from the image sequence were labelled with timestamps according to frame number. This allowed the expression of the wetting angle as a function of time. The following exponential function describes the change of the wetting angle in time θ(t):
θ ( t ) = θ k + α e β t
where:
θ k - theoretical, limit value of the wetting angle,
α - value by which the wetting angle changes from the initial value to achieve the limit value,
β - constant describing the change of the contact angle per unit time,
t - wetting time.
Figure 1. View of a droplet resting on the surface of a polysaccharide matrix as seen in the window of a digital image analysis software.
Figure 1. View of a droplet resting on the surface of a polysaccharide matrix as seen in the window of a digital image analysis software.
Preprints 167285 g001
The equation was fitted to the values of wetting angles using the least squares algorithm. The term e β describes the relative change of the angle α per unit time. The average time of the decline of angle α can be calculated as τ = 1 β . Finally, the average velocity of decrease of the wetting angle, expressed in degrees per second, was defined as:
ϑ = 1 τ
In addition, the value of wetting angle ( e) after one second from deposition of the water drop was determined from experimental data, as well as the theoretical initial value of the wetting angle defined as:
θ t = θ k + α
A theoretical curve describing the change in wetting angle over time is shown in Figure 2.

2.6. Preparation of a Suspension of MPS in Food Products

A modified cell wall polysaccharide matrix was used to prepare 2% and 5% suspensions of MPS in food products, including instant soup, salad dressing, buttermilk, tomato juice, apple juice, and instant kissel. To analyze the properties of MPS in salad dressing, buttermilk, tomato juice, and apple juice, an adequate sample weight was mixed with a sufficient amount of food fluid to obtain 2% and 5% MPS suspensions in a weight ratio. To achieve proper suspensions of MPS in instant soup and instant kissel, the required weight of MPS was mixed with the weight of the instant product, and then the instant food was prepared according to the package instructions. Samples prepared in this way were stored at a temperature of about 2°C. Before the measurement, the samples were kept at a room temperature of approximately 20 °C ± 0.5 °C for 1 hour.

2.7. Determination of Rheological Properties of MPS in Food Product Suspensions

The rheological properties of MPS suspension in food products were measured using an R/S Plus rheometer (Brookfield, Middleboro, MA) with a cone-plate sensor. Measurements were taken at 20ºC ± 0.5ºC using a constant shear rate (1200 1/s) and a variable shear rate.
The Power law model, also called Ostwald de Waele’s model, was applied to describe the rheological behavior of flow curves determined experimentally. The model is given as:
σ = K γ n  
where σ – shear stress (Pa), K – consistency index (Pasn), γ – shear rate (s-1), n – flow behaviour index. Based on the two-parameter rheological model, fluids can be classified as pseudoplastic (shear-thinning) when n<1 or dilatant (shear-thickening) when n>1. When the flow behavior index n = 1, then the consistency index K responds to a constant viscosity.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc tests, and significant differences were determined at p < 0.05 using the statistical software STATISTICA (Statistica Version 10, StatSoft Inc., USA).

3. Results

Water holding properties of MPS and its components are presented in Figure 1. Spray-dried apple pectin (APS) was characterized in the highest values of WHC, WRC, and SC. Micronized dried apple pomace with a particle size range of 50-100 μm (S2) had the lowest ability to absorb water, which was evidenced by limited values of WHC and WRC and the lowest SC. WHC and WRC of S2 at the level of approximately 3 g/g (3.37 and 3.06 g/g, respectively) were almost two times higher than reported by Figuerola et al. [20] for dried apple pomace obtained as the by-product in the juice production process, but SC was at the same level. Lyophilization of S2 resulted in the production of the S2L sample, which exhibited significantly increased water holding and retention properties, as well as enhanced swelling capacity. The polysaccharide matrix MPS, a mixture of APS and S2L in a specific proportion, exhibited a swelling capacity equal to that of S2L and comparable to APS. The water holding and water-retention capacities were slightly lower than those in APS, but an apparent synergistic effect of the two components included in the MPS was observed. The water holding capacity reported for pectin varies considerably, ranging from 0.57 g/g [21] to 21.9 g/g [22], depending on the extraction method and source. Developed MPS had comparable water holding and swelling properties to those of apple by-product, obtained through the application of high hydrostatic pressure and a commercial cellulase preparation [23] (De la Peña-Armada et al., 2021). High pressure applied to apple pomace, which enabled the accessibility of major soluble polysaccharides, may have had a similar effect to ultrasound applied to the S2 sample, which also caused an increase in water holding properties.
Due to the dynamic process of wetting, the velocity of change of the wetting angle in time and the theoretical initial value of the wetting angle were determined. The spray-dried pectin sample (APS) was identified as the most hydrophilic material studied, with a wetting angle of approximately 58.4 ± 1.8 ° (Figure 4). A relatively stable wetting angle value was found for APS compared to S2, which was characterized by the high lability of the wetting angle. Spray-drying of micronized apple pomace, resulting in S2L formation, caused stabilization in the wetting process but simultaneously led to an increase in hydrophobicity. The wetting angles of S2L and MPS reached values of approximately 87° (87.7 ± 2.0° and 87.2 ± 4.8°, respectively), which allows them to be classified as good-wettable materials [24]. S2L and MPS samples exhibited the lowest fluctuation of their contact angles, approaching the final value in the shortest time among the studied samples. Contact angle depends significantly on the particle size of the materials. Calton et al. [9] reported that for fine maltodextrin powder (d50 61.0 ±5.5 µm), it reached the value of 55.9 ±4.0°, whereas for maltodextrin coarse (d50 208.0±16.3 µm), the average contact angle was 44.7±3.1°. However, in the case of carrot pomace, the opposite dependence was observed [7]. Carrot pomace particles of a mean size of 279.4 ± 0.8 µm indicated a contact angle of 75.9 °, and carrot pomace nanoparticles of a mean size of 203.6 ± 5.1 nm displayed a contact angle of 51.7°. Modifications to the composition of apple pomace-based biocomposites enabled the obtaining of a wide range of contact angle values, from 85.3° to 137.9°, for a superhydrophobic material containing calcium carbonate and beeswax, which can be used as an effective packaging material [25]. The results of our study and literature reports indicate that cell wall polysaccharides have unique potential for tailoring water-binding properties for various applications.
Viscosity and thixotropic effect of food products with the addition of MPS are shown in Table 1. The addition of MPS in concentrations of 5% and 2% affected the viscosity of food products in most studied systems, except for the 2% MPS mixture with instant kissel. In most cases, the addition of MPS increased the viscosity of food products. The only exception was the addition of 2% MPS to the buttermilk, where the viscosity decreased compared to the control, but the higher concentration of MPS (5%) added to this product caused a significant increase in its viscosity. The most pronounced effect of MPS addition was obtained in the case of apple juice, which increased from 0.001 Pa·s to 0.020 and 0.214 Pa·s for 2% and 5% MPS, respectively. A similar effect was observed for juice made from tomatoes. The increase in the viscosity of juice products meets consumers’ expectations. Thickening and gelling juices in these cases is a result of a higher concentration of dietary fibre, which is present in food products, and is compatible with consumers’ requests [26]. Clear fruit juices, as shown for apple juice, may have very low viscosity (for clear apple juice, it is close to that of water). Such juices are entirely deprived of dietary fibre, which decreases their nutritional value. Apart from increasing viscosity, the addition of MPS can enrich food products in both soluble and insoluble fractions of dietary fibre, as previously determined for MPS using the Van Soest method [14,27]. MPS contains 32.8% of NDF, which includes 24.2 % of ADF (cellulose and lignin) and 8.6% of hemicellulose, and 67.2% of NDS, which is the soluble fibre fraction [14]. The expected increase in viscosity was also observed for the 2% and 5% suspensions of instant soup and salad dressing, as well as the 5% suspensions of buttermilk and instant kissel. Therefore, it can be stated that MPS can be considered a replacement for other thickening agents, such as starch, which is often undesired as a food component due to its unfavourable properties associated with a high post-prandial glycemic response [28].
A hysteresis loop formed between the upward and downward flow curves was used to estimate the thixotropic effect. The values of thixotropic effects for tomato juice, apple juice, salad dressing, and instant kissel suspensions increased with the increase of MPS concentration, which was higher than in the control. For instant soup, 2% MPS caused a decrease in the effect, followed by a pronounced increase over the control sample for 5% MPS added. Only in the case of buttermilk, the addition of MPS caused a slight decrease in the thixotropic effect for both MPS concentrations used. Thixotropy is associated with the complex molecular structure of the analysed material, based on the electric intermolecular interactions. The addition of MPS in these cases results in the formation of self-organizing systems of particles, caused by the action of weak bonds, such as hydrogen bonds and van der Waals forces [29]. Knowledge of the influence of MPS addition on the thixotropic effect may be helpful in designing food processing systems. Familiarity with thixotropic effect values can help determine the behavior of food ingredients during stirring, mixing, flow through pipes, and relaxation [30].
Figure 5 presents flow curves for the analysed food products. The flow curves were collected using a variable shear rate within the range 60-1800 1/s. Both upward and downward curves were fitted with the Power law (Ostwald de Waele’s) model. Parameters of this model are presented in Table 2. Flow curves for instant soup, salad dressing, and instant kissel obtained higher values of shear stress than for tomato juice, apple juice, and buttermilk. The model accurately describes the upward and downward flow curves, as evidenced by an R-squared value of greater than 0.95. Based on the model, all of the samples were classified as pseudoplastic fluids due to n values lower than 1 in each case [31]. The addition of MPS to food products caused different effects on the pseudoplasticity of suspensions. For tomato juice, the addition of MPS caused a decrease in pseudoplastic properties. In the case of apple juice, a decrease of pseudoplasticity was noted for 5% MPS suspensions in apple juice, both for upward and downward flow curves, while it was not observed after the addition of 2% MPS. Buttermilk suspensions with MPS obtained lower pseudoplasticity than in the control for upward curves, and for downward curves with the addition of 5% MPS. Instant soup exhibited higher pseudoplasticity for the 2% MPS suspension and lower pseudoplasticity for the 5% MPS suspension compared to the control, for both upward and downward curves. The opposite properties are presented in the case of upward flow curves of salad dressing – a decrease of pseudoplasticity occurred for 2% suspensions, while an increase was noticed for 5% MPS suspensions. For downward curves, an increase in pseudoplastic behaviour was noticeable in comparison to the control, which presented lower pseudoplasticity than the control upward curve. An increase in pseudoplasticity was observed in the case of instant kissel, accompanied by a decrease in n values for both upward and downward flow curves.
The consistency index K is connected with the viscosity of samples; higher values of the consistency index can be equivalent to an increase in viscosity. Generally, the addition of MPS resulted in an increase in K index values for most products. This tendency was not only present in the case of upward curves of MPS suspensions in buttermilk.

5. Conclusions

The presented study demonstrated that the polysaccharide matrix MPS, composed of natural dietary fibre from apples, may serve as an effective food texture modifier. Applied processing of apple dietary fiber polysaccharides resulted in enhancing water binding properties and stability of the wetting angle. All the components of the MPS matrix exhibited a hydrophilic character, which enabled the structurization of food products. The addition of MPS polysaccharide matrix to analyzed products, including instant soup, salad dressing, tomato juice, apple juice, and instant kissel, caused changes in the rheological properties of the food fluids; however, the extent of these changes varied. An exception was the different behaviour after the addition of MPS to buttermilk. Generally, the addition of MPS in concentrations of 2% and 5% resulted in an increase in both the thixotropic effect and viscosity. Ostwald de Waele’s model, fitted to flow curves, shows that the addition of MPS affects the pseudoplasticity of the samples. This experiment has demonstrated that the polysaccharide matrix MPS, based on natural dietary fibre from apples, can be used as a food texture modifier of natural origin with the capability to replace commonly used commercial food additives.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.; methodology, J.C. and P.P.; software, P.P.; validation, J.C., J.M. and P.P.; formal analysis, J.C.; investigation, J.M. and P.P.; resources, J.C; data curation, J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.M. and J.C.; writing—review and editing, J.C.; visualization, J.C. and P.P.; supervision, J.C.; project administration, J.C.; funding acquisition, J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The publication co-financed from the state budget under the program of the Minister of Science and Higher Education called “Science for Society II” project number NdS-II/SP/0258/2023/01, amount of funding PLN 1,000,000.00, total value of the project PLN 1,000,000.00.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rastegarpour, M.; Hakimi, H.; Chamaani, N.; Marand, M. J.; Zendeboodi, F.; Sohrabvandi, S.; Khanniri, E. Application of various hydrocolloids in fruit-based beverages to improve their properties: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 145251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, World Health Organization. Codex Alimentarius General Standard for Food Additives 2017, 2–448. [CrossRef]
  3. Carocho, M.; Morales, P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Natural food additives: Quo vadis? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 45, 284–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ayala-Zavala, J.F.; Vega-Vega, V.; Rosas-Domínguez, C.; Palafox-Carlos, H.; Villa-Rodriguez, J.A.; Siddiqui, M.W.; Dávila-Aviña,J. E.; González-Aguilar, G.A. Agro-industrial potential of exotic fruit byproducts as a source of food additives. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1866–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Poutanen, K.; Sozer, N.; Della Valle, G. How can technology help to deliver more of grain in cereal foods for a healthy diet? J. Cereal Sci. 2014, 59, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Idrovo Encalada, A.M.; Pérez, C.D.; Rossetti, L.; Rojas, A.M.; Fissore, E.N. Carrot pectin enriched fraction as a functional additive: Antioxidant and gelling effects in a model spreadable chia oil-in-water emulsion, Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 108, 106037. [CrossRef]
  7. Rezvani, Z.; Goli, S.A.H. Fabrication, physicochemical properties and structural characteristics of nanoparticles from carrot pomace and its insoluble dietary fiber. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 145, 109131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pattarapanawan, M.; Phuengjayaem, S.; Akrimajirachoote, N.; Kotatha, D. Partial enhancement of soluble fiber through pyrodextrinization of the residual starch in cassava pulp: Developing a novel dietary fiber with modified functional and improved prebiotic properties. Food Res. Int. 2025, 217, 116747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Calton, A.; Ma, H.; Nordlund, E.; Poutanen, K.; Sozer, N. Instant properties of ingredients used for point of consumption production of high-moisture food structures selectively fortified with protein and dietary fibre. J. Food Eng. 2019, 263, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Swackhamer, C.; Jang, S.; Park, B.-R.; Hamaker, B.R.; Keun Jung, S. Structure-based standardization of prebiotic soluble dietary fibers based on monosaccharide composition, degree of polymerization, and linkage composition. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 123949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, T.; Zhen, X.; Zheng, N.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, J. Functional properties and application potential of black soybean meal insoluble dietary fiber remodeled by ultrasound combined with ultrahigh pressure. LWT 2025, 221, 117594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cantu-Jungles, T.M.; Zhang, X.; Kazem, A.E.; Iacomini, M.; Hamaker, B.R.; Cordeiro, L.M.C. Microwave treatment enhances human gut microbiota fermentability of isolated insoluble dietary fibers. Food Res. Int., 2021, 143, 110293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Desai, K.; Dobruchowska, J.; Elbers, K.; Cybulska, J.; Zdunek, A.; Porbahaie, M.; Van Neerven, J.; Albers, R.; Wennekes, T.; Mercenier, A.; Schols, H.A. Structural characteristics and immunomodulating properties of carrot rhamnogalacturonan-I. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 347, 122730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mierczyńska, J.; Cybulska, J.; Sołowiej, B.; Zdunek, A. Effect of Ca2+, Fe2+ and Mg2+ on rheological properties of new food matrix made of modified cell wall polysaccharides from apple. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 133, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cybulska, J. Method of production of universal food additive for texture stabilization or thickening, especially made of apple pomace, and an additive made according to this method. Patent No. 22 6317, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cybulska, J.; Góźdź, J. Laboratory dryer for drying of agricultural and food materials. Patent No. 22 8048, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  17. Robertson, J.A.; Monredon, F.D.; Dysseler, P.; Guillon, F.; Amado, R.; Thibault, J.-F. Hydration Properties of Dietary Fibre and Resistant Starch: a European Collaborative Study. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2000, 33, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, H.; Liu, G.; Yu, B.; Zhao, H.; Tao, H; Cui, B. Water-insoluble citrus fiber enhances the textural properties and water-holding capacity of thermally generated kappa-carrageenan gels via skeletal reinforcement. Food Hydrocoll. 2025, 166, 11263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fitzgibbon, A.W.; Fisher, R.B. A Buyer’s Guide to Conic Fitting. Proc. 5th British Machine Vision Conference, Birmingham 1995, 513-522.
  20. Figuerola, F.; Hurtado, M.L.; Estévez, A. M.; Chiffelle, I.; Asenjo, F. Fibre concentrates from apple pomace and citrus peel as potential fibre sources for food enrichment. Food Chem. 2005, 91(3), 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Demir, A.E.; Armağan, H.S. Valorization of black carrot pomace by using microwave-assisted hydrothermal extraction method: An optimization and comparison research on pectin extraction. Food Hum. 2025, 4, 100637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vaz, A.A.; Bellí, G.; Oms-Oliu, G.; Martín-Belloso, O.; Odriozola-Serrano, I. Exploring the prebiotic potential of unpurified apple dietary fibre concentrate. LWT 2025, 222, 117608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De la Peña-Armada, R.; Villanueva-Suárez, M.J.; Molina-García, A.D.; Rupérez, P.; Mateos-Aparicio, I. Novel rich-in-soluble dietary fiber apple ingredient obtained from the synergistic effect of high hydrostatic pressure aided by Celluclast®. LWT 2021, 146, 111421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, M.; Chu, L.; Chen, J.; Qi, F.; Li, X.; Chen, X.; Yu, D.-G. Asymmetric wettability fibrous membranes: Preparation and biologic applications. Compos. B: Eng. 2024, 269, 111095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lang, C.V.; Jung, J.; Wang, T.; Zhao, Y. Investigation of mechanisms and approaches for improving hydrophobicity of molded pulp biocomposites produced from apple pomace. Food Bioprod. Process. 2022, 133, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yi, J.; Kebede, B.; Kristiani, K. , Grauwet, T.; Van Loey, A.; Hendrickx, M. Minimizing quality changes of cloudy apple juice: The use of kiwifruit puree and high pressure homogenization. Food Chem. 2018, 249, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jenkins, D.J.A.; Wolever, T.M.S.; Jenkins, A.L. Starchy foods and glycemic index. Diabetes Care 1988, 11, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sikora, M.; Adamczyk, G.; Krystyjan, M. Thixotropy as a measure of liquid food products. Zywn.- Nauk. Technol. Ja. 2011, 1, 5–14. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tabilo-Munizaga, G.; Barbosa-Cánovas, G.V. Rheology for the food industry. J. Food Eng. 2005, 67, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Penna, A.L.B.; Sivieri, K.; Oliveira, M.N. Relation between quality and rheological properties of lactic beverages. J. Food Eng. 2001, 49, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Example plot of the theoretical curve, describing the change in wetting angle over time, with the physical interpretation of the parameters of the equation [1] plotted.
Figure 2. Example plot of the theoretical curve, describing the change in wetting angle over time, with the physical interpretation of the parameters of the equation [1] plotted.
Preprints 167285 g002
Figure 3. Water holding capacity (WHC), water retention capacity (WRC), and swelling capacity (SC) of spray-dried applepectin (APS), micronized apple pomace (S2), freeze-dried apple pomace (S2L), and polysaccharide matrix (MPS).
Figure 3. Water holding capacity (WHC), water retention capacity (WRC), and swelling capacity (SC) of spray-dried applepectin (APS), micronized apple pomace (S2), freeze-dried apple pomace (S2L), and polysaccharide matrix (MPS).
Preprints 167285 g003
Figure 4. Experimental ( θ e ) and theoretical ( θ t ) wetting angle and the velocity of change of the wetting angle in time ( ϑ ).
Figure 4. Experimental ( θ e ) and theoretical ( θ t ) wetting angle and the velocity of change of the wetting angle in time ( ϑ ).
Preprints 167285 g004
Figure 5. Flow curves (shear stress vs. shear rate) for MPS suspensions in tomato juice, apple juice, buttermilk, instant soup, salad dressing, and instant kissel.
Figure 5. Flow curves (shear stress vs. shear rate) for MPS suspensions in tomato juice, apple juice, buttermilk, instant soup, salad dressing, and instant kissel.
Preprints 167285 g005
Table 1. Viscosity (Pa·s) and thixotropic effect (kPa*s-1) for suspensions of MPS in food products. Mean values with standard deviations. Values with different letters show statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Table 1. Viscosity (Pa·s) and thixotropic effect (kPa*s-1) for suspensions of MPS in food products. Mean values with standard deviations. Values with different letters show statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Tomato Juice Apple Juice Buttermilk Instant
Soup
Salad Dressing Instant Kissel
Viscosity (Pa·s) Control 0.011a
± 0.001
0.001a
± 0.001
0.020a
± 0.001
0.035a
± 0.009
0.089a
± 0.013
0.530a
± 0.091
2%MPS 0.025b
± 0.004
0.020b
± 0.001
0.014b
± 0.001
0.014b
± 0.001
0.327b
± 0.052
0.530a
± 0.086
5%MPS 0.128c
± 0.020
0.214c
± 0.016
0.038c
± 0.012
0.519 c
± 0.137
0.671c
± 0.041
0.718b
± 0.096
Thixotropic effect (kPa*s-1) Control 0.300a
± 0.137
nd 8.640a
± 2.973
7.726a
± 1.554
43.228a
± 6.861
69.532a
± 4.526
2%MPS 5.742b
± 0.991
3.254b
± 0.951
5.197b
± 1.322
3.542b
± 0.344
92.837b
± 32.594
134.215b
± 10.333
5%MPS 21.221c
± 6.666
28.055c
± 5.758
7.574c
± 3.142
76.235c
± 5.211
570.483c
±192.995
115.458c
± 19.591
nd – not determined.
Table 2. Parameters for the Power Law model describing rheological properties of MPS suspensions in food products. K – consistency index (Pasn); n – flow behaviour index; R2 – determination coefficient.
Table 2. Parameters for the Power Law model describing rheological properties of MPS suspensions in food products. K – consistency index (Pasn); n – flow behaviour index; R2 – determination coefficient.
Food Product Sample Upward Curve Downward Curve
K (Pasn) n R2 K (Pasn) n R2
Tomato juice Control 1.00 ± 0.002 0.30 ± 0.01 0.99 2.76 ± 1.52 0.20 ± 0.01 0.99
2%MPS 1.06 ± 0.01 0.47 ± 0.04 0.99 1.004 ± 0.005 0.47 ± 0.03 0.99
5%MPS 2.11 ± 0.61 0.57 ± 0.06 0.99 2.077 ± 0.74 0.57 ± 0.01 0.99
Apple juice Control nd nd nd nd nd nd
2%MPS 1.08 ± 0.06 0.45 ± 0.03 0.98 1.001 ± 0.002 0.43 ± 0.01 0.98
5%MPS 14.82 ± 5.61 0.38 ± 0.02 0.96 14.86 ± 6.21 0.38 ± 0.03 0.95
Buttermilk Control 2.64 ± 1.42 0.29 ± 0.11 0.99 1.003 ± 0.005 0.37 ± 0.015 0.99
2%MPS 1.002 ± 0.002 0.40 ± 0.02 0.99 1.005 ± 0.004 0.37 ± 0.02 0.99
5%MPS 1.02 ± 0.03 0.52 ± 0.06 0.99 1.007 ± 0.002 0.51 ± 0.052 0.99
Instant soup Control 1.29 ± 0.05 0.46 ± 0.049 0.99 1.002 ± 0.015 0.47 ± 0.0058 0.99
2%MPS 1.74 ± 1.25 0.39 ± 0.015 0.99 1.91 ± 1.58 0.44 ± 0.09 0.99
5%MPS 16.05 ± 2.72 0.48 ± 0.017 0.99 15.73 ± 2.49 0.49 ± 0.02 0.99
Salad dressing Control 16.41 ± 6.23 0.32 ± 0.06 0.99 3.32 ± 0.85 0.53 ± 0.01 0.99
2%MPS 22.54 ± 10.88 0.41 ± 0.07 0.99 10.21 ± 1.54 0.51 ± 0.006 0.99
5%MPS 186.97 ± 82.02 0.28 ± 0.05 0.99 83.20 ± 29.87 0.36 ± 0.03 0.99
Instant kissel Control 6.53 ± 1.12 0.58 ± 0.026 0.99 8.21 ± 0.029 0.55 ± 0.01 0.99
2%MPS 67.16 ± 7.69 0.29 ± 0.00 0.99 47.47 ± 6.21 0.34 ± 0.00 0.99
5%MPS 107.58 ± 8.05 0.27 ± 0.01 0.99 110.21 ± 9.30 0.27 ± 0.01 0.99
nd – not determined.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated