Submitted:
07 July 2025
Posted:
09 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Key Challenges
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Data Collection and Experimental Setup
3.2. Condition Monitoring Techniques
- Oil Debris Analysis – Metal particle concentration in lubricating oil was monitored to assess gearbox health. An increase in metallic contaminants indicated excessive wear or lubrication breakdown, which could lead to catastrophic failures if left unaddressed. Advanced spectroscopic techniques, such as inductive particle counting and ferrography, were employed to quantify wear debris and distinguish between different failure sources.
- Temperature Monitoring – Heat levels within the gearbox were continuously tracked to detect signs of misalignment, excessive loading, or lubrication inefficiencies. A sudden rise in temperature was correlated with increased friction and mechanical stress, which could accelerate wear and lead to component failure. Infrared thermography and embedded thermal sensors provided real-time monitoring, enabling early intervention to prevent severe damage.

4. Results and Analysis
4.1. Stress and Temperature Trends During Operation

4.1.1. Trends Observed
- Cyclic Stress Variations
- b.
- Relationship between different stresses
- c.
- Temperature influence
4.2. Finite Element Analysis of Gearbox Stress Distribution
4.2.1. Stress Distribution Trends
4.3. Machine Learning-Based Fault Prediction
4.4. Machine Learning Model Performance
| Algorithm | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) |
| SVM | 92 | 91 | 93 |
| Random Forest | 89 | 87 | 90 |
| ANN | 94 | 92 | 95 |
| KNN | 85 | 82 | 86 |
4.4.1. Key Insights and Practical Applications
- Critical stress points: Peaks in stress cycles indicate periods of maximum mechanical load, which could correspond to higher operational speeds or torque.
- Stress and temperature correlation: While stress cycles are independent, their amplitudes might be affected by temperature changes.
- Long-term analysis: Identifying consistent peaks and troughs helps engineers assess fatigue life, predict failures, and optimize gearbox performance.
- Gearbox health monitoring: Identifying excessive stress fluctuations can signal early wear, misalignment, or impending failures.
- Predictive maintenance: Using stress and temperature trends, operators can schedule maintenance before failures occur.
- Efficiency improvements: Understanding stress distributions allows engineers to optimize gearbox design, lubrication, and load management.
- The highest stress points (sun gear & planetary gears) indicate potential failure zones.
- Engineers can reinforce or modify high-stress regions to extend gearbox lifespan.
- Understanding stress trends helps schedule preventive maintenance to avoid costly failures.
5. Conclusions
- AI models predict failures with up to 94% accuracy.
- FEA confirms planetary gears as high-risk components.
- Predictive maintenance reduces gearbox failures by 40% and improves efficiency by 20%.
Funding
Author contributions
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflict of interest
Competing interests
References
- Abbas Mardani, Ahmad Jusoh, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas. “Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Techniques and Applications – Two Decades Review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Systems with Applications 2015, 42, 4126–4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ackermann, T. 2005. Wind Power in Power SystemsNo Title.
- Alemayehu, F. M. , & Ekwaro-Osire, S. n.d. “Loading and Design Parameter Uncertainty in the Dynamics and Performance of High-Speed-Parallel-Helical-Stage of a Wind Turbine Gearbox.” Journal of Mechanical Design 136(091002). [CrossRef]
- Dao, Cuong, Behzad Kazemtabrizi, and Christopher Crabtree. “Wind Turbine Reliability Data Review and Impacts on Levelised Cost of Energy.” Wind Energy 2019, 22, 1848–1871. [CrossRef]
- Faulin, J. , Juan, A. A., Martorell, S., & Ramirez-Marquez, J. E. 2010. Simulation Methods for Reliability and Availability of Complex Systems.
- Govindan Kannan, Shaligram Pokharel, P. Sasi Kumar. 2009. “A Hybrid Approach Using ISM and Fuzzy TOPSIS for the Selection of Reverse Logistics Provider.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54(1). [CrossRef]
- Henrioud, Ke Chen and J... M. 1994. “Systematic Generation of Assembly Precedence Graphs.” Pp. 1476–82 in Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. San Diego.
- Hongfei Zhai, Caichao Zhu, Chaosheng Song, Huaiju Liu, Houyi Bai. 2016. Influences of Carrier Assembly Errors on the Dynamic Characteristics for Wind Turbine Gearbox, Mechanism and Machine Theory.
- Huh, EN. , Welch, L. R. n.d. “Adaptive Resource Management for Dynamic Distributed Real-Time Applications.” J Supercomput 38. [CrossRef]
- Lee G, Kim H, Lee SB, Kim D, Lee E, Lee SK, Lee SG. Tailored Uniaxial Alignment of Nanowires Based on Off-Center Spin-Coating for Flexible and Transparent Field-Effect Transistors. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Mingfei, Bin Zhou, Jie Li, Xinyu Li, and Jinsong Bao. 2023. “A Knowledge Graph-Based Approach for Assembly Sequence Recommendations for Wind Turbines.” Machines 11(10). [CrossRef]
- Mandol, S. , Bhattacharjee, D., Dan, P. K. (2017). 2017. “Structural Optimisation of Wind Turbine Gearbox Deployed in Non-Conventional Energy Generation.” Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies 65. [CrossRef]
- Mardani, A. , Jusoh, A. , & Zavadskas, E. K. “Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Techniques and Applications – Two Decades Review from 1994 to 2014.” Expert Systems with Applications 2015, 42, 4126–4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Min, Zhang, Zhang Zhijing, Shi Lingling, and Zhang Weimin. 2019. “Assembly Error Modeling and Calculating Method of Precision Mechanical System.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1345(2). [CrossRef]
- Mu, S.Q. , Yuan, B. , Wang, Y., Sun, W., & Liu, C. “Error Optimization Design of Assembly Parts Using Small Displacement Torsor Tolerance Mapping.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 2022, 236, 955–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mu X, Yuan B, Wang Y, Sun W, Liu C, Sun Q. “Novel Application of Mapping Method from Small Displacement Torsor to Tolerance: Error Optimization Design of Assembly Parts.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 2022, 236, 955–967. [CrossRef]
- Mukred, J. , Muslim, M. , & Selamat, H. “Optimizing Assembly Sequence Time Using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO).” Applied Mechanics and Materials 2013, 315, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mutale, S. , and X. Wang. “Levels of Automation in Quality Sampling and Analysis of Copper.” Industrial Engineering Letters 2014, 4, 89–102. [Google Scholar]
- Ni J, Tang WC, Xing Y. “Performance of Reducing the Dimensional Error of an Assembly by the Rivet Upsetting Direction Optimization.” Roceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 2017, 231, 2133–2144. [CrossRef]
- Nourmohammadi, Amir, Amos H. C. Ng, Masood Fathi, Janneke Vollebregt, and Lars Hanson. “Multi-Objective Optimization of Mixed-Model Assembly Lines Incorporating Musculoskeletal Risks Assessment Using Digital Human Modeling.” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 2023, 47, 71–85. [CrossRef]
- Guiza, C. Mayr-Dorn, M. Mayrhofer, A. Egyed and H. R. Brandt. 2022. “Assembly Precedence Graph Mining Based on Similar Products.” Pp. 1–7 in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT).
- Pan, H. , Hou, W., & Li, T. 2010. “Genetic Algorithm for Assembly Sequences Planning Based on Heuristic Assembly Knowledge.” Applied Mechanics and Materials (44–47):3657–61. [CrossRef]
- Panda, S. , Mohanty, B. , & Hota, P. K. “Hybrid BFOA-PSO Algorithm for Automatic Generation Control of Linear and Nonlinear Interconnected Power Systems.” Applied Soft Computing 2013, 13, 4718–4730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Passino, K. M. 2002. “Biomimicry of Bacterial Foraging for Distributed Optimization and Control.” Pp. 52–67 in IEEE Control Systems Magazine.
- Sankar, S. , & Nataraj, M. “Prevention of Helical Gear Tooth Damage in Wind Turbine Generator: A Case Study.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy 2010, 224, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, Y. , & Eberhart, R. C. 1998. “A Modified Particle Swarm Optimizer.” Pp. 69–73 in 1998 IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation proceedings. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence.
- Sutton, R. S. , & Barto, A. G. 2018. Reinforcement Learning: An IntroductionNo Title.
- Sydney Mutale, Yong Wang, Jan Yasir and Traore Aboubacar. 2024. “Advanced Optimization Techniques for PASP: A Comparative Study of Improved PSO and BFO.” Easy Chair. https://easychair.org/publications/preprint_download/xxlF.
- Teeparthi, K. , & Kumar, D. “Multi-Objective Hybrid PSO-APO Algorithm Based Security Constrained Optimal Power Flow with Wind and Thermal Generators.” Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 2017, 20, 411–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tseng, Hwai En, Chien Cheng Chang, and Ting Wei Chung. “Applying Improved Particle Swarm Optimization to Asynchronous Parallel Disassembly Planning.” IEEE Access 2022, 10, 80555–80564. [CrossRef]
- Whittle, M. , Trevelyan, J. , Shin, W., & Tavner, P. “Improving Wind Turbine Drivetrain Bearing Reliability through Pre-misalignment.” Wind Energy 2014, 17, 1217–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- William Ho, Xiaowei Xu, Prasanta K. Dey. “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approaches for Supplier Evaluation and Selection: A Literature Review.” European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 201, 16–24. [CrossRef]
- Wang, L. , Tian, D., Gou, X. et al. Hybrid particle swarm optimization with adaptive learning strategy. Soft Comput 2024, 28, 9759–9784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu-Hsien Hsu, Ju-An Jao, Yen-Liang Chen. “Discovering Conjecturable Rules through Tree-Based Clustering Analysis.” Expert Systems with Applications 2005, 29, 493–505. [CrossRef]
- Wu, Bo, Peihang Lu, Jie Lu, Jinli Xu, and Xiaogang Liu. “A Hierarchical Parallel Multi-Station Assembly Sequence Planning Method Based on GA-DFLA.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 2022, 236, 2029–2045. [CrossRef]
- Xiangyu, Z. , Liu, L., Wan, X., Wang, K., & Huang, Q. 2019. “Assembly Sequence Optimization Based on Improved PSO Algorithm.” 457–65. [CrossRef]
- Xu, X. , Hu, W. , Cao, D., Huang, Q., Chen, C., & Chen, Z. “Optimized Sizing of a Standalone PV-Wind-Hydropower Station with Pumped-Storage Installation Hybrid Energy System.” Renewable Energy 2020, 147, 1418–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Xiao, Weihao Hu, Di Cao, Qi Huang, Cong Chen, and Zhe Chen. “Optimized Sizing of a Standalone PV-Wind-Hydropower Station with Pumped-Storage Installation Hybrid Energy System.” Renewable Energy 2020, 147, 1418–1431. [CrossRef]
- Yang, Yanfang, Miao Yang, Liang Shu, Shasha Li, and Zhiping Liu. 2020. “A Novel Parallel Assembly Sequence Planning Method for Complex Products Based on PSOBC.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2020. [CrossRef]
- Ye, Fu-Lan, Chou-Yuan Lee, Zne-Jung Lee, Jian-Qiong Huang, and Jih-Fu Tu. “Incorporating Particle Swarm Optimization into Improved Bacterial Foraging Optimization Algorithm Applied to Classify Imbalanced Data.” Symmetry 2020, 12, 229. [CrossRef]
- Zhai, H. , Zhu, C. , Song, C., Liu, H., & Bai, H. “Influences of Carrier Assembly Errors on the Dynamic Characteristics for Wind Turbine Gearbox.” Mechanism and Machine Theory 2016, 103, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhan, Zh. , Zhang, J. 2008. “Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5217. [CrossRef]
- Zhu, D. , Li, R., Zheng, Y. et al. Cumulative Major Advances in Particle Swarm Optimization from 2018 to the Present: Variants, Analysis and Applications. Arch Computat Methods Eng (2025). [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).