Submitted:
25 June 2025
Posted:
26 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Expansive Soil
2.2. Guar Gum
2.4. Experimental Design
2.4.1. Sample Preparation
2.5. Experimental Methods
3. Result Analysis
3.1. Effect of Guar Gum Content on Disintegratio
3.2. The Effect of Palm Fiber Content and Length on UCS
3.2.1. Failure Modes of Improved Expansive Soil Samples
3.3. Triaxial Compression Strength Test
3.3.1. Stress-Strain Relationship Curve of Improved Expansive Soil
3.3.2. Shear Failure Modes of Improved Expansive Soil Samples in Triaxial Compression Test
3.3.3. The Effect of Guar Gum and Palm Fiber Content on the Shear Strength Parameters of Modified Expansive Soil
3.4. Mechanism Analysis of Guar Gum-Improved Soil
3.5. Mechanism of Guar Gum-Palm Fiber Composite Improvement of Expansive Soil
4. Discussion
- Guar gum can effectively improve the water stability of expansive soil. With the increase in guar gum content, the disintegration resistance of the samples significantly improves. When the guar gum content reaches 2%, the disintegration rate of the sample reaches the threshold of 0.85% and virtually no further disintegration occurs. Therefore, it is recommended that the guar gum content in practical applications be 2%.
- Both guar gum and guar gum-palm fiber composite materials can enhance the unconfined compressive strength of expansive soil, with the guar gum-palm fiber composite material showing the best improvement. Under the condition of a fixed palm fiber content, the compressive strength of the soil initially increases and then decreases as the palm fiber length increases. When the palm fiber content is 0.6% and the length is 6mm, the unconfined compressive strength of the composite improved soil increases the most, with a 20.9% higher compressive strength compared to expansive soil improved with 2% guar gum.
- The addition of palm fiber can improve the shear strength of guar gum-treated soil. As the palm fiber content increases, the stress-strain curve of the composite improved soil gradually rises. The two shear strength indicators, cohesion and internal friction angle, both increase as the palm fiber content rises. When the ratio is 2% guar gum and 0.6%-6mm palm fiber, the increase in the two shear strength indicators levels off, with increases of 52.1% and 12.4%, respectively, compared to pure guar gum-treated soil. However, further increasing the palm fiber content is detrimental to the improvement of the soil’s shear strength.
- Guar gum and palm fiber have a significant impact on the failure modes of the expansive soil samples. Under axial pressure, the guar gum-improved soil exhibits a “V”-shaped failure, with cracks not penetrating the sample; while the composite improved soil shows irregular vertical cracks, and as the content increases, the cracks gradually shorten. Under shear failure, both guar gum-improved soil and guar gum-palm fiber composite improved soil show bulging failure, and the deformation gradually decreases with the increase in palm fiber content.
- Scanning electron microscope analysis of the micro-improvement mechanism of guar gum-palm fiber improved soil reveals that the gel matrix generated by the hydration reaction of guar gum can enhance the bonding strength of soil particles through stretching, wrapping, and filling, thus improving the water stability and mechanical properties of expansive soil. The reinforcement effect of palm fiber further enhances the mechanical properties of the improved soil.
- This composite improvement method can not only effectively increase the bearing capacity and deformation ability of expansive soil, but also is environmentally friendly and has broad potential for promotion. However, this study is limited to expansive soil in Nanning, Guangxi,China, and the results are applicable only under conventional conditions. Therefore, the identified optimal ratio has certain limitations, and further research and verification are needed for specific situations.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tiwari, N.; Satyam, N.; Puppala, A.J. Strength and durability assessment of expansive soil stabilized with recycled ash and natural fibers. Transportation Geotechnics 2021, 29, 100556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabab’ah, S.; Al Hattamleh, O.; Aldeeky, H.; Alfoul, B.A. Effect of glass fiber on the properties of expansive soil and its utilization as subgrade reinforcement in pavement applications. Case Studies in Construction Materials 2021, 14, e00485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blayi, R.A.; Sherwani, A.F.H.; Ibrahim, H.H.; Faraj, R.H.; Daraei, A. Strength improvement of expansive soil by utilizing waste glass powder. Case Studies in Construction Materials 2020, 13, e00427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, A.K.; Jha, A.K. Geotechnical behaviour and micro-analyses of expansive soil amended with marble dust. Soils and Foundations 2020, 60, 737–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narani, S.; Abbaspour, M.; Hosseini, S.M.M.; Aflaki, E.; Nejad, F.M. Sustainable reuse of Waste Tire Textile Fibers (WTTFs) as reinforcement materials for expansive soils: With a special focus on landfill liners/covers. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 247, 119151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.; Xu, L.; Liu, W.; Shang, Y.; Su, N.; Feng, D. Field Test Study on the dynamic response of the cement-improved expansive soil subgrade of a heavy-haul railway. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2020, 128, 105878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dang, L.C.; Khabbaz, H.; Ni, B.-J. Improving engineering characteristics of expansive soils using industry waste as a sustainable application for reuse of bagasse ash. Transportation Geotechnics 2021, 31, 100637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, B.; Cai, K.; Zeng, X.; Li, Z.; Hu, Z.; Chen, Q.; He, C.; Chen, B.; Huang, X. Experimental study on physical-mechanical properties of expansive soil improved by multiple admixtures. Advances in Civil Engineering 2021, 2021, 5567753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barman, D.; Dash, S.K. Stabilization of expansive soils using chemical additives: A review. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 2022, 14, 1319–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamza, M.; Nie, Z.; Aziz, M.; Ijaz, N.; Fang, C.; Ghani, M.U.; Ijaz, Z.; Noshin, S.; Salman, M. Geotechnical properties of problematic expansive subgrade stabilized with guar gum biopolymer. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2023, 25, 1699–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keshav, N.; Prabhu, A.; Kattimani, A.; Dharwad, A.; Kallatti, C.; Mahalank, S. Enhancing the properties of expansive soil using biopolymers—xanthan gum and guar gum. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference 2019: IGC-2019 Volume IV, Springer; 2021:129-35.
- Vydehi, K.V.; Moghal, A.A.B. Effect of biopolymeric stabilization on the strength and compressibility characteristics of cohesive soil. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 2022, 34, 04021428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vydehi, K.V.; Moghal, A.A.B. Compressibility characteristics of Guar gum-treated expansive soil. In Proceedings of the Ground Improvement and Reinforced Soil Structures: Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference 2020 Volume 2, Springer; 2021:339-45.
- Xu, X.; Chu, H.; Wang, Q.; Li, J.; Yuan, X.; Niu, C.; Lei, H.; Yu, Z. Dispersion, mechanical, hydrophysical properties and mechanistic analysis of improved dispersive soil using guar gum. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2025, 84, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anandha Kumar, S.; Sujatha, E.R.; Pugazhendi, A.; Jamal, M.T. Guar gum-stabilized soil: A clean, sustainable and economic alternative liner material for landfills. Clean technologies and environmental policy 2021, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medina-Martinez, C.J.; Sandoval-Herazo, L.C.; Zamora-Castro, S.A.; Vivar-Ocampo, R.; Reyes-Gonzalez, D. Natural fibers: an alternative for the reinforcement of expansive soils. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Standard. Test Methods of Soils for Highway Engineering. JTG 3430—2020. Transportation Ministry of the People's Republic of China; 2020.
- Hu, Q.; Song, W.; Hu, J. Study of the mechanical properties and water stability of microbially cured, coir-fiber-reinforced clay soil. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Wu, Z.; Chen, H.; Shao, L.; Zhou, X.; Wang, S. Triaxial shear behavior of basalt fiber-reinforced loess based on digital image technology. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 2021, 25, 3714–3726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widianti, A.; Diana, W.; Alghifari, M. Shear strength and elastic modulus behavior of coconut fiber-reinforced expansive soil. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1144. IOP Publishing; 2021; p. 012043. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.; Mu, J.; Chen, A.; Long, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zou, J. Experimental Study on the Properties of Basalt Fiber–Cement-Stabilized Expansive Soil. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khattak, M.J.; Alrashidi, M. Durability and mechanistic characteristics of fiber reinforced soil–cement mixtures. The International Journal of Pavement Engineering 2006, 7, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acharya, R.; Pedarla, A.; Bheemasetti, T.V.; Puppala, A.J. Assessment of guar gum biopolymer treatment toward mitigation of desiccation cracking on slopes built with expansive soils. Transportation Research Record 2017, 2657, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Consoli, N.C.; Casagrande, M.D.; Prietto, P.D.; Thomé, A.n. Plate load test on fiber-reinforced soil. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 2003, 129, 951–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yixian, W.; Panpan, G.; Shengbiao, S.; Haiping, Y.; Binxiang, Y. Study on strength influence mechanism of fiber-reinforced expansive soil using jute. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 2016, 34, 1079–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]












| Liquid limit (%) |
Plastic limit (%) |
Plasticity index (%) |
Free swelling ratio(%) |
Specific gravity |
maximum dry density (g/cm3) |
optimum moisture content(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59.3 | 20.9 | 38.4 | 75 | 2.68 | 1.78 | 14.38 |
| Density (g·cm3) |
Mean diameter (mm) |
Young’s modulus (Gpa) |
Tensile strength (Mpa) |
Elongation at break (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.37 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 135.2 | 18.75 |
| Specimen number | Test type | Soil sample name | Dosage of guar gum(G/%) | Dosage of palm fiber(P/%) | Length of palm fiber(L/mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry 1 * | Disintegration test | Undisturbed soil | — | — | — |
| Guar gum improved soi | 0.5,1,1.5,2,2.5 | — | — | ||
| 7 | UCS | Undisturbed soil | — | — | — |
| 8~11 | Guar gum improved soil | 0.5,1,1.5,2 | — | — | |
| 12~15 | Composite improved soil | Optimal dosage(2%) | 0.2 | 3,6,9,12 | |
| 16~19 | 0.4 | 3,6,9,12 | |||
| 20~23 | 0.6 | 3,6,9,12 | |||
| 24 | Triaxial compression test | Undisturbed soil | — | — | — |
| 25 | Guar gum improved soil | Optimal dosage(2%) | — | — | |
| 26 | Composite improved soil | Optimal dosage(2%) | 0.2 | Optimal length(6mm) | |
| 27 | 0.4 | — | |||
| 28 | 0.6 | — |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).