Submitted:
17 June 2025
Posted:
19 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Pollution Status and Its Impact on the Ganga River
1.1.1. Water Quality in Haridwar and Rishikesh
1.1.2. Heavy Metal Contamination
1.1.3. Impact of Religious and Touristic Activities
1.2. Impact on Religious Beliefs and Practices
1.2.1. Changing Perceptions of the Sacred River
1.2.2. Renegotiation of Ritualistic Practices
1.3. Environmental Laws and Governance
1.3.1. Existing Legal Frameworks
1.3.2. Legal Innovations: Granting Personhood to the Ganga
1.3.3. Community-Based Solutions
| Location | Key Parameters | Observations | Citation |
| Haridwar | DO: 10.32–13.24 mg/L | Indicates good water quality, but seasonal variations exist (Ruhela et al., 2018) (Matta, 2015). | (Ruhela et al., 2018) (Matta, 2015) |
| Rishikesh | BOD: 1.08–3.66 mg/L | Suggests moderate pollution levels, with some parameters exceeding safe limits (Haritash et al., 2016) (Matta, 2015). | (Haritash et al., 2016) (Matta, 2015) |
| Haridwar | Heavy Metals (As, Cr) | Cancer risk values exceed the target risk of 1 × 10⁻⁴, posing health risks (Subuddhi et al., 2022) (Kumar et al., 2020). | (Subuddhi et al., 2022) (Kumar et al., 2020) |
1.4. The Ganga as a Sacred and Ecological Lifeline
1.5. Sacred Significance of the Ganga
1.6. Ecological Importance of the Ganga
1.7. Challenges Facing the Ganga
1.7.1. Pollution and Environmental Degradation
1.7.2. Over-Exploitation of Resources
1.7.3. Climate Change and Glacier Retreat
1.8. Efforts to Rejuvenate the Ganga
1.8.1. Government Initiatives
1.8.2. Community-Based Approaches
1.8.3. Ecohydrological Approaches
1.9. The Interplay of Sacredness and Ecology
- Community Participation: Empowering local communities to take ownership of river conservation through education and involvement in decision-making processes (Nandi et al., 2016) (Das & Tamminga, 2012).
- Sustainable Water Management: Implementing policies to reduce water abstraction, control pollution, and restore natural flow regimes (Sinha & Prasad, 2020) (Kumar & Kumar, 2017).
- Ecohydrological Restoration: Adopting nature-based solutions to enhance biodiversity, improve water quality, and maintain ecosystem services (Singh & Singh, 2020) (Munawar et al., 2022).
- Cultural and Religious Mobilization: Leveraging the river's sacredness to inspire environmental action and promote a sense of responsibility among devotees (Chapple, 2002) (Kedzior, 2015).
| Aspect | Description | Citation |
| Cultural Significance | Revered as a goddess with purificatory powers; central to Hindu rituals | (The River of Life, Death, Livelihood and Pilgrimage: An Assessment of Ganges in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 2022) (Chapple, 2002) |
| Ecological Importance | Supports 500 million people; rich biodiversity; self-purifying capacity | (Singh & Singh, 2020) (Sinha & Prasad, 2020) |
| Management Challenges | Pollution, over-exploitation, climate change, and inadequate governance | (Vyas et al., 2023) (Kumar & Kumar, 2017) |
1.10. Sources of Pollution
- Untreated Sewage and Industrial Waste: A significant portion of the pollution in the Ganga River is attributed to untreated sewage and industrial effluents. Daily, millions of liters of untreated waste are discharged into the river, contributing to its degradation (Stone, 2011) (Sharma, 2021).
- Agricultural Runoff: The use of fertilizers and pesticides in agriculture leads to runoff that carries these chemicals into the river, further polluting the water and affecting its quality (Sharma, 2021).
- Sand Mining and Construction: Activities such as sand mining and bridge construction along the riverbanks contribute to the pollution by disturbing the riverbed and increasing sedimentation (Zafar & Kumari, 2024).
1.11. Environmental and Health Impacts
- Water Quality Degradation: The presence of heavy metals and other pollutants has led to a decline in water quality, as indicated by various water quality indices such as Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) (Shukla et al., 2021) (Chaudhary et al., 2017).
- Health Risks: The polluted water poses significant health risks, including waterborne diseases such as diarrhea, which is particularly prevalent among children under five (Trivedi, 2014).
- Ecological Damage: The pollution has led to a reduction in biodiversity and has endangered various aquatic species. The reduced flow of the river due to upstream water diversions further exacerbates these ecological issues (Das, 2014) (Adel, 2012).
1.12. Mitigation Efforts
- Government Initiatives: The Indian government has launched several initiatives to address the pollution in the Ganga, including the installation of sewage treatment plants (STPs) and the implementation of stricter norms for wastewater treatment (Singh et al., 2023).
- Community and Grassroots Movements: Local communities and grassroots organizations have been actively involved in campaigns to clean the river and raise awareness about the importance of maintaining its health (Stone, 2011).
1.13. Environmental Impacts
- Water Quality Degradation: The Ganga River's water quality is severely compromised due to industrial discharges and untreated sewage. Studies have shown that the water quality index (WQI) at Haridwar is poor, with high levels of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD), indicating significant organic pollution (Ruhela et al., 2018) (Kumar et al., 2020).
- Heavy Metal Contamination: The presence of heavy metals such as lead, chromium, and cadmium in the river water and sediments poses a serious threat to aquatic life and human health. These metals exceed permissible limits, leading to chronic health issues and ecological damage (Sankhla et al., 2018) (Patil & Arya, 2024).
- Ecosystem Disruption: Pollution has led to the degradation of aquatic habitats and loss of biodiversity. The reduced flow of the river due to water diversions further exacerbates the concentration of pollutants, affecting the river's self-purifying capacity (Das, 2014).
1.14. Cultural Impacts
- Religious Practices: The Ganga is central to Hindu religious practices, with millions of pilgrims visiting Haridwar and Rishikesh for ritual bathing. However, the pollution has made the water unsafe for such activities, challenging the cultural and spiritual significance of the river (Jhariya & Tiwari, 2020) (Das & Tamminga, 2012).
- Community Livelihoods: Many communities depend on the Ganga for their livelihoods, including those involved in religious tourism and fishing. Pollution threatens these livelihoods by making the river less attractive to tourists and reducing fish populations (Das & Tamminga, 2012).
1.15. Proposed Solutions
- Improved Waste Management: Enhancing sewage treatment infrastructure and ensuring the treatment of industrial effluents before discharge into the river are critical steps. This requires investment in modern treatment technologies and strict enforcement of environmental regulations (Baba, 2024) (Shah et al., 2018).
- Public Participation and Awareness: Engaging local communities in pollution control efforts and raising awareness about the importance of maintaining river health can foster a sense of ownership and responsibility. Programs like the Namami Gange emphasize community involvement for effective river rejuvenation (Das & Tamminga, 2012) (Vyas et al., 2023).
- Restoration of River Flow: Increasing the natural flow of the river by managing water diversions and promoting groundwater-based irrigation can help dilute pollutants and restore the river's ecological balance (Shah et al., 2018).
- Policy and Governance: Strengthening governance frameworks, reducing corruption, and enhancing accountability in pollution control agencies are essential for effective implementation of pollution control measures (Baba, 2024).
1.16. Environmental Impacts
- Water Quality Degradation: The Ganga River's water quality is severely compromised due to industrial discharges and untreated sewage. Studies have shown that the water quality index (WQI) at Haridwar is poor, with high levels of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD), indicating significant organic pollution (Ruhela et al., 2018) (Kumar et al., 2020).
- Heavy Metal Contamination: The presence of heavy metals such as lead, chromium, and cadmium in the river water and sediments poses a serious threat to aquatic life and human health. These metals exceed permissible limits, leading to chronic health issues and ecological damage (Sankhla et al., 2018) (Patil & Arya, 2024).
- Ecosystem Disruption: Pollution has led to the degradation of aquatic habitats and loss of biodiversity. The reduced flow of the river due to water diversions further exacerbates the concentration of pollutants, affecting the river's self-purifying capacity (Das, 2014).
1.17. Cultural Impacts
- Religious Practices: The Ganga is central to Hindu religious practices, with millions of pilgrims visiting Haridwar and Rishikesh for ritual bathing. However, the pollution has made the water unsafe for such activities, challenging the cultural and spiritual significance of the river (Jhariya & Tiwari, 2020) (Das & Tamminga, 2012).
- Community Livelihoods: Many communities depend on the Ganga for their livelihoods, including those involved in religious tourism and fishing. Pollution threatens these livelihoods by making the river less attractive to tourists and reducing fish populations (Das & Tamminga, 2012).
1.18. Proposed Solutions
- Improved Waste Management: Enhancing sewage treatment infrastructure and ensuring the treatment of industrial effluents before discharge into the river are critical steps. This requires investment in modern treatment technologies and strict enforcement of environmental regulations (Baba, 2024) (Shah et al., 2018).
- Public Participation and Awareness: Engaging local communities in pollution control efforts and raising awareness about the importance of maintaining river health can foster a sense of ownership and responsibility. Programs like the Namami Gange emphasize community involvement for effective river rejuvenation (Das & Tamminga, 2012) (Vyas et al., 2023).
- Restoration of River Flow: Increasing the natural flow of the river by managing water diversions and promoting groundwater-based irrigation can help dilute pollutants and restore the river's ecological balance (Shah et al., 2018).
- Policy and Governance: Strengthening governance frameworks, reducing corruption, and enhancing accountability in pollution control agencies are essential for effective implementation of pollution control measures (Baba, 2024).
1.19. Religious Importance in Hinduism
1.20. Role in Rituals and Pilgrimages
1.21. Overview of Indian Water Pollution Laws
1.22. Regulatory Failures in Monitoring and Enforcement
1.23. Discharge of Untreated and Poorly Treated Waste as Legal Non-Compliance
1.24. Human Waste: Sewage and Domestic Effluent
1.25. Industrial Waste: Effluent from Factories and Small Industries
1.26. Degradation of Water Quality: Non-Potable Ganga Water
1.27. Impact on Aquatic Ecosystems
1.28. Public Health Risks from Contaminated Water
1.29. Loss of Biodiversity in the Ganga
1.30. Inefficiencies in Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs)
- Technological Limitations: Many STPs, particularly in developing regions, suffer from outdated or inappropriate technologies that are not suited to the local sewage characteristics. For instance, in India, the Narela STP operates at only 17.5% of its capacity due to technological and maintenance challenges (Yadav et al., 2021). Similarly, in South Africa, poor maintenance of wastewater infrastructure contributes significantly to water pollution (Mema, 2010).
- Operational Challenges: The lack of skilled manpower and inadequate training are critical issues affecting the efficiency of STPs. In India, unskilled operations have been identified as a major factor in the low efficiency of sewage treatment plants (Chatterjee et al., 2016). This is compounded by financial constraints that limit the ability to invest in training and advanced technologies (-, 2024).
1.31. Misrepresentation of “Treated” Water
- Quality Standards: There is often a discrepancy between the reported and actual quality of treated water. In Morocco, while some STPs meet WHO and FAO standards, a significant portion of wastewater is discharged without adequate treatment (Zarri et al., 2024). This misrepresentation can lead to the reuse of inadequately treated water, posing health risks.
- Regulatory Compliance: In South Africa, the lack of compliance with effluent discharge standards results in the release of poor-quality effluents, increasing health risks (Karsten, 2015). This highlights the need for stringent regulatory oversight to ensure that treated water meets safety standards.
1.32. Lack of Accountability and Oversight
- Regulatory Gaps: The absence of robust regulatory frameworks and enforcement mechanisms allows for negligence in wastewater management. In South Africa, there is no precedent for criminal liability in cases of negligence in wastewater treatment, which undermines accountability (Karsten, 2015).
- Monitoring and Evaluation: Effective monitoring systems are often lacking, which hinders the ability to assess and improve the performance of STPs. In China, despite significant infrastructure investments, challenges persist due to inadequate monitoring and evaluation practices (Ghernaout & Elboughdiri, 2020).
1.33. Socioeconomic Factors Driving Negligence
- Financial Constraints: Limited budgets and high costs of advanced technologies are significant barriers to improving wastewater management. This is particularly evident in developing countries where financial resources are scarce (-, 2024).
- Public Awareness and Involvement: Socioeconomic factors, such as public awareness and involvement, play a crucial role in driving improvements in wastewater management. In Africa, enhancing public participation and government support is essential for addressing wastewater management challenges (Omohwovo, 2024).
1.34. Redirecting Treated Wastewater for Forest Irrigation
1.35. Upgrading and Monitoring Sewage Treatment Infrastructure
1.36. Enforcing Stricter Industrial Effluent Standards
1.37. Community Awareness and Religious Leader Involvement
1.38. Policy Reforms for Better Enforcement of Environmental Laws
1.39. Successful River Restoration Models
- Thames River: The restoration of the Thames River in the UK has been successful due to high levels of sewage treatment and strict regulation of industrial effluents, which have significantly improved water quality. The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and dissolved oxygen (DO) levels in the Thames are maintained at healthy levels, demonstrating the effectiveness of these measures (Sharma et al., 2021).
- Rhine River: The Rhine River restoration involved international cooperation and comprehensive pollution control measures, including the reduction of industrial discharges and the restoration of natural habitats. This has led to improved water quality and increased biodiversity (Friberg et al., 2016).
1.40. Applicability of Global Practices to the Ganga
- Integrated Management: The Namami Gange Program (NGP) is an integrated conservation mission that aims to rejuvenate the Ganga by implementing sustainable water management practices. This approach aligns with global practices that emphasize the need for coordinated efforts and technology preparedness (Balkrishna et al., 2024).
- Community Involvement: Successful global models highlight the importance of community engagement. The Ganga Action Plan and subsequent initiatives have struggled due to limited public participation. Enhancing community involvement could improve the effectiveness of these programs (Das & Tamminga, 2012).
- Pollution Control: Like the Thames, the Ganga requires stringent regulation of industrial and municipal waste. The establishment of sewage treatment plants (STPs) under the Namami Gange Program has shown improvements in water quality, indicating the potential for further success with continued investment and regulation (Chaurasia et al., 2024).
1.41. Lessons from Other Indian River Cleaning Initiatives
- Gomti River: The Gomti River restoration emphasizes the need for holistic wastewater management and sustainable urban planning. These strategies are crucial for mitigating pollution and enhancing river health, providing a model for the Ganga (Pandey & Rastogi, 2024).
- Hindon River: The Hindon River's challenges highlight the importance of treating sewage and industrial effluents. Lessons from the Thames River suggest that focusing on these areas can lead to significant improvements in water quality (Sharma et al., 2021).
1.42. Balancing Religious Sentiments and Environmental Protection
- The Ganges is deeply intertwined with Hindu religious practices, which complicates efforts to implement strict environmental regulations. Rituals such as bathing and cremation contribute to pollution but are integral to the cultural and spiritual life of millions (Das & Tamminga, 2012) (Saini et al., 2015).
- Religious teachings can be leveraged to promote environmental stewardship. Integrating spiritual values with environmental ethics can foster a sense of ecological responsibility among the faithful (Imran, 2024) (Andira et al., 2024).
- Successful examples of religious teachings influencing environmental behavior suggest that a religious framework could support conservation efforts, potentially bridging the gap between religious practices and environmental needs (Imran, 2024) (Palmer & Finaly, 2003).
1.43. Challenges in Implementing Sustainable Solutions
1.44. Role of Government, NGOs, and Local Communities
1.45. Long-Term Vision for a Clean Ganga
1.46. Pollution as a Cultural and Environmental Crime
1.47. Clarion Call for Action: Restoring the Ganga’s Sanctity
1.48. Recommendations for Policy, Community, and Technological Interventions
- Policy Interventions: Implement zero discharge policies for industrial and municipal waste, and promote the reuse and recycling of wastewater (Saini et al., 2015).
- Community Engagement: Encourage community-based solutions and integrate religious sentiments to foster a collective responsibility towards the river (Chopra et al., n.d.).
- Technological Innovations: Develop cost-effective sewage treatment technologies and enhance river flow management to dilute pollutants (Mishra, 2005) (Shah et al., 2018).
- Infrastructure Development: Rapidly build and upgrade sewerage infrastructure in cities along the Ganga to prevent untreated sewage discharge (Shah et al., 2018).
1.49. A Collective Responsibility to Protect the Holy River
2. Suggestions for Restoration
3. Conclusion
References
- Achieving Sustainable Development Goal Related to Water and Sanitation through Proper Sewage Management. (2023). [CrossRef]
- Adel, M. M. (2012). Downstream ecocide from upstream water piracy.American Journal of Environmental Sciences. [CrossRef]
- Agoramoorthy, G. (2012). India’s pollution nightmare: can it be tackled?Environmental Science & Technology. [CrossRef]
- Alley, K. D. (2002).On the Banks of the Ganga: When Wastewater Meets a Sacred River.
- Andira, M. A., Pallu, D., Sari, I., Maria, H., Agam, I., Toraja, K. N., Makale-Makassar, Jl. P., Tana, K., & Toraja, T. (2024).Merajut Spiritualitas Dan Lingkungan: Tinjauan Teologis Terhadap Keselamatan Alam. [CrossRef]
- Baba, F. (2024).Water Pollution: Causes, Impacts, and Solutions: a critical review. [CrossRef]
- Balkrishna, A., Singh, S. K., Ghosh, S., Banerjee, S., Verma, S., & Arya, V. (2024). An analytical review on the integrated management of river resources through Namami Gange.Water Policy. [CrossRef]
- Baruah, M. C. (2017). Reducing waste by restoring rivers with special reference to river ganga.Abhinav-National Monthly Refereed Journal Of Research In Commerce & Management.
- Bhadula, S., & Joshi, B. D. (2014). Impact of religio-touristic activities on the water quality of ganga river and solid waste generation within haridwar city, india.The International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences.
- Bhargawi, M., J, G. G., & V.N, M. (n.d.). Biological health of River Ganga, in the Light of Metal Pollution: A Review.International Journal of Zoological Investigations. [CrossRef]
- Bhatt, A., Srivastava, P., & Yadav, P. kumar. (2023). Ganga: A subtle overview of names and glory in Sanskrit literature and the current scenario.Dev Sanskriti : Interdisciplinary International Journal. [CrossRef]
- Bilgrami, K. S., & Kumar, S. (1998). Bacterial contamination in water of the river ganga and its risk to human health.International Journal of Environmental Health Research. [CrossRef]
- Bowes, M. J., Read, D. S., Joshi, H., Sinha, R., Ansari, A., Hazra, M., Simon, M., Vishwakarma, R. K., Armstrong, L. K., Nicholls, D. J. E., Wickham, H., Ward, J., Carvalho, L., & Rees, H. G. (2020). Nutrient and microbial water quality of the upper Ganga River, India: identification of pollution sources.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. [CrossRef]
- Chapple, C. K. (2002). Hinduism and ecology: the intersection of earth, sky, and water.Journal of the American Oriental Society. [CrossRef]
- Chatterjee, P., Ghangrekar, M. M., & Rao, S. (2016). Low efficiency of sewage treatment plants due to unskilled operations in India.Environmental Chemistry Letters. [CrossRef]
- Chaudhary, M., Mishra, S., & Kumar, A. (2017). Estimation of water pollution and probability of health risk due to imbalanced nutrients in River Ganga, India.International Journal of River Basin Management. [CrossRef]
- Chaurasia, D. K., Rana, N. K., & Sharma, V. N. (2024).From Pollution to Preservation: Impacts of the Namami Gange Project on the Ganga River Ecosystem in the Varanasi Urban Area. [CrossRef]
- Chopra, A. K., Prasad, G., & Khanna, D. R. (n.d.).Ganges Water Pollution and Its Management Through Religion. [CrossRef]
- Choudhary, M., & Ray, S. (2024). Sustainable wastewater management: exploring nature-based treatment.International Journal on Environmental Sciences. [CrossRef]
- Das, P., & Tamminga, K. (2012). The ganges and the GAP: An assessment of efforts to clean a sacred river.Sustainability. [CrossRef]
- Das, S. (2014).Ganga – Our Endangered Heritage. [CrossRef]
- Dobriyal, K. (n.d.).Cultural Significance of Ganga, the Indian National River. [CrossRef]
- Doron, A., Barz, R., & Nelson, B. (2017).An Anthology of Writings on the Ganga: Goddess and River in History, Culture, and Society.
- Drew, G. (2012). A retreating goddess? Conflicting perceptions of ecological change near the Gangotri-Gaumukh Glacier.Journal for The Study of Religion, Nature and Culture. [CrossRef]
- Dwivedi, S., Chauhan, P. S., Mishra, S., Mishra, S., Kumar, A., Singh, P. K., Kamthan, M., Chauhan, R., Awasthi, S., Yadav, S., Mishra, A., Mallick, S., Ojha, S. K., Tewari, S. K., Tripathi, R. D., Nautiyal, C. S., & Nautiyal, C. S. (2020). Self-cleansing properties of Ganga during mass ritualistic bathing on Maha-Kumbh.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. [CrossRef]
- Friberg, N., Friberg, N., Angelopoulos, N., Buijse, A. D., Cowx, I. G., Kail, J., Moe, T. F., Moir, H., O’Hare, M. T., Verdonschot, P. F. M., & Wolter, C. (2016).Effective River Restoration in the 21st Century: From Trial and Error to Novel Evidence-Based Approaches. [CrossRef]
- Ghernaout, D., & Elboughdiri, N. (2020). Domestic Wastewater Treatment: Difficulties and Reasons, and Prospective Solutions—China as an Example.Open Access Library Journal. [CrossRef]
- Hailemariam, T. (2023).Sustainable Technologies for Treatment of Industrial Wastewater and Its Potential for Reuse. [CrossRef]
- Haritash, A. K., Gaur, S., & Garg, S. (2016). Assessment of water quality and suitability analysis of River Ganga in Rishikesh, India.Applied Water Science. [CrossRef]
- Imran, M. H. (2024).Religious Solutions to Environmental Problems. [CrossRef]
- J. J. (2024). Challenges in Wastewater Treatment Plant.International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. [CrossRef]
- Jhariya, D. C., & Tiwari, A. K. (2020).Ganga River: A Paradox of Purity and Pollution in India due to Unethical Practice. [CrossRef]
- Jolly, S., & Menon, K. S. R. (2021). Of Ebbs and Flows: Understanding the Legal Consequences of Granting Personhood to Natural Entities in India.Transnational Environmental Law. [CrossRef]
- Kala, C. P. (2018).Cultural Significance and Current Conservation Practices of the Ganga’s Ecosystem and Environment. [CrossRef]
- Karsten, A. S. J. (2015). Criminal liability : negligence and environmental health : opinion.Occupational Health Southern Africa.
- Kedzior, S. B. (2014).Ganga : the benevolent purifier under siege.
- Kedzior, S. B. (2015).Pollution and the Renegotiation of River Goddess Worship and Water Use Practices Among the Hindu Devotees of India’s Ganges/Ganga River. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, D., Kumar, D., Malik, D. S., Kumar, N., Gupta, N., & Gupta, V. (2020). Spatial changes in water and heavy metal contamination in water and sediment of river Ganga in the river belt Haridwar to Kanpur.Environmental Geochemistry and Health. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P., & Bharti, P. K. (2012). Effluent quality assessment of different drains in SIDCUL industrial Area at Haridwar (Uttarakhand).Environment Conservation Journal.
- Kumar, P., & Bharti, PawanKr. (n.d.).Effluent Quality Assessment of Different Drains in SIDCUL Industrial Area at Haridwar (Uttarakhand). [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R., & Kumar, R. (2017).Preliminary Assessment and Attempt to Maintain Minimum Ecological Flows in Upper and Middle Ganga River. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S., & Murty, M. N. (2011).Water Pollution in India: An Economic Appraisal.
- Kumar, Gaurav et.al. (2024). Crafting Responsibility: Strategies for Balancing Economic Growth with Public Health and Environmental Sustainability in India’s Liquor Sector.
- Lako, A., & Çomo, E. (2024). Sustainable Water Management: An Integrated Approach to Solving the Problems of Wastewater Treatment.Qubahan Academic Journal. [CrossRef]
- M, E. (1992).The sacred and the profane.
- Matta, G. (2015).Evaluation and prediction of deviation in physico-chemical characteristics of River Ganga.
- Matta, G., Kumar, A., Nayak, A., & Kumar, P. (2022). Appraisal of spatial–temporal variation and pollution source estimation of Ganga River system through pollution indices and environmetrics in Upper Ganga basin.Applied Water Science. [CrossRef]
- Mema, V. (2010). Impact of poorly maintained wastewater sewage treatment plants - lessons from South Africa : wastewater management.The First Resource.
- Micheaux, F. L. de. (2019).Political Ecology of a sacred river: Hydrosocial cycle and govemance of the Ganges, India.
- Mishra, V. B. (2005). The Ganga at Varanasi and a travail to stop her abuse.Current Science.
- Munawar, M., Fitzpatrick, M., & Munawar, I. F. (2022). Application of the Laurentian Great Lakes ‘Ecosystem Approach’ towards remediation and restoration of the mighty River Ganges, India.Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management. [CrossRef]
- Nadi, B. A., & Mohib, M. M. (2024).Importance and Solutions for Environmental Protection in the Light of Islamic Teachings. [CrossRef]
- Nandi, I., Tewari, A., & Shah, K. (2016). Evolving Human Dimensions and the Need for Continuous Health Assessment of Indian Rivers.Current Science. [CrossRef]
- Obaideen, K., Shehata, N., Sayed, E. T., Abdelkareem, M. A., Mahmoud, M. E., & Olabi, A. (2022). The Role of Wastewater Treatment in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and sustainability guideline.Energy Nexus. [CrossRef]
- Omohwovo, E. J. (2024). Wastewater Management in Africa: Challenges and Recommendations.Environmental Health Insights. [CrossRef]
- Ostroff, M. D. (2022).Noncompliance with Environmental Rules Is Worse Than You Think. [CrossRef]
- Pal, P. K. (2023).Arth Ganga: A Sustainable Model for Ganga River Rejuvenation. [CrossRef]
- Palmer, M., & Finaly, V. (2003).Faith in conservation : new approaches to religions and the environment. [CrossRef]
- Pandey, Ar. D., & Rastogi, Ar. P. (2024). Unlocking the potential: transforming the gomti river into a model of river health.EPRA International Journal of Economic Growth and Environmental Issues. [CrossRef]
- Patil, A., & Arya, M. (2024). Water Quality Assessment and Heavy Metal Analysis of Ganga River System and Effluent Water of SIDCUL at Haridwar through Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy.Journal of Mountain Research. [CrossRef]
- Paul, D. (2017). Research on heavy metal pollution of river Ganga: A review.Annals of Agrarian Science. [CrossRef]
- Prasad, K. S., & Prasad, B. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 Nationwide Lockdowns and Unlock Phases in India on River Water Quality of Upper Part of the Ganga River.Applied Environmental Research. [CrossRef]
- Rame, R., Purwanto, P., & Sudarno, S. (2023). Sustainable and integrated industrial wastewater treatment as a base of green industry 4.0.Nucleation and Atmospheric Aerosols. [CrossRef]
- Roy, M., & Shamim, F. (2020).Research on the Impact of Industrial Pollution on River Ganga: A Review.
- Ruhela, M., Kumar, P., Tyagi, V., Ahamad, F., & Ram, K. (2018). Assessment of water quality of River Ganga at Haridwar with reference to Water Quality Index.Environment Conservation Journal. [CrossRef]
- Saini, A., Saini, R., Gupta, A., & Grover, R. (2015).Ganga deterioration and conservation of its sanctity.
- Sankhla, M. S., Kumari, M., Sharma, K., Kushwah, R. S., & Kumar, R. (2018). Heavy Metal Pollution of Holy River Ganga: A Review.International Journal of Research.
- Saxena, A., Srivastava, R. K., Singh, S. B., Ram, R. N., & Pandey, N. (2024). Heavy Metals in Fishes, Water and Macrophyte of the Ganga River and Risk Related to their Consumption.Toxicology International. [CrossRef]
- Secretariat, L. S. (2015). Water pollution in India: Eighth report of the (Sixteenth Lok Sabha) Public Accounts Committee (2014-15).Research Papers in Economics.
- Shah, T., Ray, C., & Lele, U. (2018). How to clean up the Ganges.Science. [CrossRef]
- Shankar, R., Nale, S., Prakash, P., Singh, G. P., & Singh, S. (n.d.).The Physiochemical, Biological Quality and Seasonal Variability of River Ganges in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S. K. (2021). Water Pollution: An Analysis.International Journal of Science and Research. [CrossRef]
- Sharma, V., Joshi, H., & Bowes, M. J. (2021). A Tale of Two Rivers: Can the Restoration Lessons of River Thames (Southern UK) Be Transferred to River Hindon (Northern India)?Water Air and Soil Pollution. [CrossRef]
- Shi-chang, M. (n.d.).Ganges——a Holy River that Symbolizes Indian Culture. [CrossRef]
- Shirin, S., & Yadav, A. K. (2014). Physico-Chemical Analysis of Municipal Wastewater Discharge in Ganga River, Haridwar District of Uttarakhand, India.Current World Environment. [CrossRef]
- Shukla, A. K., Ojha, C. S. P., Shukla, S., & Garg, R. D. (2021).Water Quality Challenges in Ganga River Basin, India. [CrossRef]
- Siddiqui, E., & Pandey, J. (2019). Assessment of heavy metal pollution in water and surface sediment and evaluation of ecological risks associated with sediment contamination in the Ganga River: a basin-scale study.Environmental Science and Pollution Research. [CrossRef]
- Sigdel, R., Carlton, G. J., & Gautam, B. (2023). Resolving the Ganges pollution paradox: A policy-centric systematic review.River. [CrossRef]
- Singh, A. (2021). Water Pollution: The Water Act 1974 A Critical Analysis.Journal of Pollution Effects and Control.
- Singh, D., Shukla, A. K., Yadav, S., Pandey, G., & Dutta, V. (2022). The Ganga River Water Pollution Status in India characterize with river Gomti.Ecology, Environment and Conservation. [CrossRef]
- Singh, R., & Singh, G. (2020). Integrated management of the Ganga River: An ecohydrological approach.Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology. [CrossRef]
- Singh, S., Ahmad, F., Raghuvanshi, D., Dublish, G., Satavan, R., & Vidyarthi, A. K. (2023). Policy Interventions towards Sewage Management and Improvement in Water Quality of River Ganga.The Indian Forester. [CrossRef]
- Sinha, R. K., & Prasad, K. (2020).Management of Water Quality and Biodiversity of the River Ganga. [CrossRef]
- Stone, R. (2011). A Remedy at Last for the Ailing Ganges.Science. [CrossRef]
- Subuddhi, S., Kansal, A., Pandey, P., Ghoshal, T., & Singhal, N. K. (2022). Impact Examination of the Lockdown on the Status of the Heavy Metal Pollution Index and Health Risk of Ganga River Water Quality.Environmental Engineering Research. [CrossRef]
- Thara, K., Selvabharathi, G., & Sampathkumar, N. (2024).The overview of sustainable technologies for the treatment of industrial waste water and its potential for reuse. [CrossRef]
- The River of Life, Death, Livelihood and Pilgrimage: An Assessment of Ganges in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. (2022). [CrossRef]
- Tiwari, D., Kumar, R., Yadav, M., Rai, S., & Singh, S. K. (2024).Holistic Analysis of Ganga Basin Water Quality: A Statistical Approach with WQI, HMCI, HMQI,and HRI Indices. [CrossRef]
- Trivedi, R. C. (2014).Water Quality Challenges in Ganga Basin, India. [CrossRef]
- Tyagi, V. K., Bhatia, A., Gaur, R. Z., Khan, A., Ali, M., Khursheed, A., Kazmi, A. A., & Lo, S.-L. (2013). Impairment in water quality of Ganges River and consequential health risks on account of mass ritualistic bathing.Desalination and Water Treatment. [CrossRef]
- Ulusoy, A., Atılgan, A., Rolbiecki, R., Jagosz, B., & Rolbiecki, S. (2024). Innovative Approaches for Sustainable Wastewater Resource Management.Agriculture. [CrossRef]
- Vemsani, L. (2021).Ganga: The Multi-form Feminine Divine. [CrossRef]
- Vijayanandan, A., Kazmi, A. A., & Philip, L. (2023).Domestic and industrial wastewater treatment: current status and challenges in India. [CrossRef]
- Vyas, J. N., Nath, S., Deogade, R. B., & Chandra, P. (2023).Rejuvenation of Rivers in India: A Case Study on Efforts for Rejuvenation of River Ganga. [CrossRef]
- Water Pollution Control. (2022). [CrossRef]
- Yadav, S., Anand, S., Paramjit, P., & Singh, J. (2021).Efficiency Assessment of Sewage Treatment Plants for Treating Wastewater: Case Study of Narela Sewage Treatment Plants in Delhi, India. [CrossRef]
- Zafar, M. M., & Kumari, A. (2024). Spatio-temporal evaluation of the impact of anthropogenic stressors on physico-chemical characteristics and water quality of the River Ganga using GIS-based approach in the middle Gangetic Plains at Patna, Bihar, India.Water Science and Technology. [CrossRef]
- Zagonari, F. (2020). Comparing Religious Environmental Ethics to Support Efforts to Achieve Local and Global Sustainability: Empirical Insights Based on a Theoretical Framework.Sustainability. [CrossRef]
- Zarri, M., Benichou, S. A., Fahde, A., Amraoui, F., & Tahiri, M. (2024).Compliance with WHO and FAO Standards for Treated Water from the Nouaceur and Mediouna’s Wastewater Treatment Plants for Reuse in Watering and Irrigation. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
