Submitted:
18 June 2025
Posted:
19 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
1.2. Research Questions
1.3. Research Objectives
1.4. Significance of the Study
1.4.1. Theoretical Benefits
- Enriching the scholarly discourse in the field of intellectual property law, particularly related to the adaptation of copyright concepts in the digital era.
- Enhancing understanding of digital consumer behavior, particularly the phenomenon of cognitive dissonance and the psychological, sociological, and moral factors influencing the decision to consume illegal content.
- Contributing to the development of theoretical models for combating complex and multi-dimensional cybercrime.
1.4.2. Practical Benefits
- For Government and Regulators: Providing empirical evidence and strategic recommendations based on evidence to formulate more adaptive, effective, and comprehensive policies for tackling online film piracy, including law enforcement and digital literacy efforts.
- For the Creative Industry (Film Companies and Legal Platforms): Providing in-depth insights into the motivations and behavior of users of pirated films, enabling the development of more competitive business models, increased accessibility of legal platforms, and the design of more relevant and engaging anti-piracy campaigns for consumers.
- For Society or Digital Film Users: Raising awareness about data security risks and financial losses resulting from accessing illegal content, and promoting behavioral change towards legal and ethical consumption of content to support the sustainability of the national creative industry.
- For Future Researchers: Providing a strong foundation of data and analysis for further research in the fields of digital copyright, cybersecurity, consumer behavior, and strategies for combating film piracy.
2. Literature Review
2.1. Concept of Digital Copyright
2.2. Online Film Piracy and Its Characteristics
2.3. Previous Studies on User Perception of Pirated Films
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Research Type and Approach
3.2. Data Collection Procedure
3.3. Data Analysis Technique
3.3.1. Identification and Extraction of Key Information
3.3.2. Organization of Finding
3.3.3. Information Synthesis
3.3.4. Analysis and Interpretation
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Research Findings
4.1.1. Findings on the Concept of Digital Copyright in the Era of Piracy
4.1.2. Findings on the Characteristics and Evolution of Online Film Piracy
4.1.3. Findings on Data Security Risks
4.1.4. Findings on User Perceptions and Behavior
4.2. Discussion
4.2.1. Analysis of Issues Based on Research Findings
4.2.2. Analysis of Factors Influencing User Perception
4.2.3. Theoretical and Practical Implications
4.3. Solutions and Strategic Recommendations
4.3.1. Short-Term Strategy (0–2 Years)
4.3.2. Medium-Term Strategy (2–5 Years)
4.3.3. Long-Term Strategy (5–10 Years)
4.3.4. Implementation and Monitoring Framework
5. Conclusion
5.1. Conclusion
5.2. Recommendations
5.2.1. For the Government
5.2.2. For the Content Industry
5.2.3. For Educational Institutions
5.2.4. For Further Researchers
References
- Baihaqi, A. (2022). Hak Cipta dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Q-Media.
- Dharmawan, S., Ardian, M. F., Firdaus, A., Ramadhan, M. D., & Santoso, S. (2021). Analisis minat generasi Z dan milenial pada film ilegal dan situs film legal. Narada: Jurnal Desain & Seni, 8(2), 137–138. [CrossRef]
- Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual. (2020). Modul kekayaan intelektual tingkat dasar bidang hak cipta. Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. https://www.dgip.go.id/unduhan/download/modul-kekayaan-intelektual-tingkat-dasar-bidang-hak-cipta-edisi-2020-4-2021.
- Editorial CXO Media. (2023, Oktober 20). Survei: Hanya 30 persen penonton Indonesia yang menonton dari OTT legal. CXO Media. https://www.cxomedia.id/general-knowledge/20231020155722-20-156844/survei-hanya-30-persen-penonton-indonesia-yang-menonton-dari-ott-legal. Diakses pada 4 Juni 2025.
- Fahrizzal, F., & Kusuma, A. (2024). Persepsi Generasi Z terhadap pembajakan film Indonesia melalui TikTok dan Telegram. Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 6(10), 4533–4543. [CrossRef]
- Haryanto, J. (2021). Klasifikasi data untuk perlindungan data pribadi (Case Study Series #37). Center for Digital Society, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://cfds.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/1423/2021/01/37-CfDS-Case-Study-Klasifikasi-Data-untuk-Perlindungan-Data-Pribadi.pdf.
- Maulana, E. (2023). Ketentuan tindak pidana bagi pelaku pembajakan film dalam perspektif hukum pidana Islam (Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry). Repositori UIN Ar-Raniry. http://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/.
- Pham, Q. T., Dang, N. M., & Nguyen, D. T. (2020). Factors affecting on the digital piracy behavior: An empirical study in Vietnam. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 32–45. [CrossRef]
- Putri, O. I. P. I. (2024). Tindak pidana penyiaran ulang hak cipta karya sinematografi pada aplikasi Telegram: Sebuah telaah kritis. Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 13(3), 307–318. [CrossRef]
- Wardani, A. S. (2022, Februari 25). 5 bahaya nonton dan download film dari situs streaming ilegal. Liputan6.com. https://www.liputan6.com/tekno/read/4895819/5-bahaya-nonton-dan-download-film-dari-situs-streaming-ilegal. Diakses pada 4 Juni 2025.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
