Submitted:
16 June 2025
Posted:
17 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Background and Rationale
1.2. Conceptual Foundations
1.3. South Asia and Bangladesh: A Media-Historical Context
1.4. Research Objectives and Questions
- a)
- To analyze how traumatic events are visualized, narrated, and circulated in South Asian and Bangladeshi media.
- b)
- To investigate how eroticism and moral panic intersect, particularly in representations of female and marginalized bodies.
- c)
- To examine the role of digital platforms, algorithms, and user engagement in amplifying these phenomena.
- d)
- To understand the complicity and resistance of audiences within this media ecosystem.
- How are trauma and panic constructed and commodified in Bangladeshi and South Asian media?
- What role does eroticism play in shaping public reactions to gendered crises?
- How do media platforms algorithmically privilege certain kinds of affect-laden content?
- In what ways are audiences complicit in, or resistant to, these spectacularized narratives?
1.7. Significance of the Study
2. Literature Review
2.1. The Capitalist Spectacle and Media Culture
2.2. Trauma as Media Commodity
2.3. Eroticized Panic: Gender, Morality, and Spectacle
2.4. Affective Capitalism and Emotional Governance
2.5. Media Rituals, Surveillance, and the Normalization of Panic
2.6. Trauma, Gendered Bodies, and the Production of National Morality
2.7. Algorithms, Viral Culture, and Panic Production
2.8. South Asian Media Economies and Localized Spectacles
3. Theoretical Framework
3.1. Introduction: Constructing a Critical Lens
3.2. The Spectacle Society: From Debord to Digital Platforms
3.3. Affective Economies and Emotional Governance
3.4. Feminist Media Theory: Eroticized Panic and Gendered Surveillance
3.5. Trauma Studies and Media Aestheticization
3.6. Postcolonial Media Theory and South Asian Moral Governance
3.7. Surveillance Capitalism and Algorithmic Spectacles
3.8. Synthesis: Toward a Decolonial Media Critique
4. Methodology
4.1. Research Design Overview
4.2. Research Objectives and Questions
4.2.1. Research Objectives
4.2.2. Key Research Questions
4.3. Data Sources and Sampling
4.3.1. Media Text Corpus
4.3.2. Audience Survey
4.3.3. Focus Groups and Interviews
4.4. Analytical Frameworks
4.4.1. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)
4.4.2. Visual Semiotics and Affective Spectacle
4.4.3. Psychoanalytic Media Theory
4.5. Digital Ethnography of Emotional Reactions
4.6. Ethical Considerations
4.7. Limitations of the Study
4.8. Reflexivity and Positionality
4.9. Data Analysis Techniques
4.10. Validity, Reliability, and Trustworthiness
5. Findings and Interpretations
5.1. Introduction: The Spectacle Materialized
5.2. Pattern One: Trauma as Visual Drama in News and Social Media
- Visual Aesthetics of Suffering: News channels like Channel 24 and Jamuna TV consistently use zoom-ins on facial grief, slow-motion sequences, and music overlays. These stylizations transform real suffering into cinematic narrative arcs.
- Trauma Fragmentation: The representation of traumatic events is often decontextualized, with little historical or structural background. This reinforces what Chouliaraki (2006) calls ‘distant suffering’—an aesthetic experience rather than a political issue.
- Platform Imitation: Social media creators emulate this style, sharing user-generated content of public grief and humiliation (e.g., funeral processions, family breakdowns), often with added effects and hashtags like #HotNews or #CrimeStoryBD.
5.3. Pattern Two: Eroticized Panic as Gendered Governance
- Moral Dichotomy: Media coverage constructed female TikTokers as threats to ‘Bengali culture’ and Islam while simultaneously using their images to attract viewership. This reflects Rubin’s (1984) model of sexual panic embedded in structural power.
- Sexualized Voyeurism: Interview data revealed that many viewers condemned the videos while privately admitting to watching and sharing them—an erotic-moral contradiction.
- Algorithmic Amplification: TikTok’s and Facebook’s content promotion systems appear to push such ‘borderline content,’ recognizing the emotional arousal and controversy it generates.
5.4. Pattern Three: Trauma and Nationalism
- Visual Frames: Images of malnourished children and veiled women were widely circulated but often without names, voices, or context—transforming individuals into archetypes.
- Security Overtones: News reports began shifting tones—from empathy to portraying refugees as burdens, risks, or even suspects of extremism.
- Emotive Narratives: Interviewed journalists admitted editorial shifts based on political agendas, revealing how trauma reporting was ‘guided by interest.’
5.5. Pattern Four: Platformization of Panic and Attention Economies
- Engagement Loops: Facebook and TikTok algorithms prioritized posts that received angry, shocked, or sad reactions. Videos with crying victims, ‘immoral’ women, or accusations of blasphemy saw exponential engagement.
- Crowdsourced Justice: Netizens often acted as moral vigilantes—identifying, exposing, and harassing individuals involved in controversial videos or images. This often led to offline consequences including suicide, arrests, and mob attacks.
- Digital Evidence Economy: As Rahman (2023) argues, a new ‘evidence economy’ emerges where screenshots and videos function as both proof and provocation, bypassing legal institutions.
5.6. Pattern Five: Gendered and Classed Narratives in Erotic Scandals
- Middle-class, urban, lighter-skinned women are more likely to become ‘viral’ and thus vilified.
- Working-class or rural women involved in trauma (rape, harassment) are often ignored unless their suffering fits a cinematic mold.
- Class narratives frequently blame ‘poor parenting’ or ‘slum culture’ for moral decay, reinforcing bourgeois nationalism.
5.7. Lived Experiences: From Spectacle to Trauma
5.8. Affective Feedback Loops and Spectacle Reproduction
- Repetitive coverage of female suicides with sensational visuals
- Prime-time debates around morality involving clerics and influencers
- Facebook boosting emotionally charged hashtags
5.9. Concluding Interpretation: Spectacle as Social Structure
6. Discussion and Theoretical Synthesis
6.1. Introduction: Mapping Meaning Beyond the Findings
6.2. Spectacle as an Ideological Apparatus in Postcolonial Societies
6.3. The Gendered Economy of Visibility: Affective and Erotic Commodities
6.4. Surveillance Capitalism and Algorithmic Affect
6.5. Trauma Commodification and the Post-Humanitarian Turn
- De-politicizing structural violence: e.g., dowry deaths, poverty suicides, or ethnic cleansing are framed as ‘tragedies’ rather than political outcomes.
- Emotional Governance: Grief is collectivized to promote nationalism, such as in the coverage of terror attacks or natural disasters.
6.6. Intersections of Class, Gender, and Spectacular Violence
- A poor woman dancing on TikTok is deemed vulgar.
- A celebrity doing the same is seen as bold or stylish.
6.7. Digital Vigilantism and Spectacular Justice
6.8. From Victims to Viral Objects: The Ontology of Being Watched
6.9. Toward a Post-Spectacle Politics
- Alternative Media Ethics: Grounded in feminist and postcolonial critiques that resist commodification of suffering.
- Platform Regulation: Against algorithmic bias toward affective extremes.
- Spectacle Literacy: Teaching media users to decode spectacle as ideology, not reality.
7. Policy Recommendations and Counter-Narratives
7.1. Introduction: Moving from Diagnosis to Prescription
7.2. State and Governmental Interventions
7.2.1. Regulating Algorithmic Amplification
- Mandate transparency reports from tech platforms on what kinds of content are boosted and suppressed.
- Establish independent algorithm audit bodies that evaluate emotional bias, especially around gendered and religious content.
- Impose penalties for incitement through emotional manipulation and allow victims of viral mob spectacles to seek legal redress.
7.2.2. Digital Protection Laws for Women
- Introduce gender-sensitive cybercrime units with trained personnel to respond to doxxing, revenge porn, and digital mob attacks.
- Promote legal redress mechanisms for victims of spectacle-based humiliation, including takedown orders and compensation.
7.3. Media Institutions and Ethical Reform
7.3.1. Adopting Post-Spectacle Journalism Ethics
- Adopting a ‘do no harm’ editorial policy, especially in cases of trauma and gender.
- Avoiding aestheticization of suffering, including slow-motion replays, intrusive interviews with grieving families, or use of dramatic music.
- Incorporating ethics checklists before publishing viral content that could lead to mass outrage or online mobs.
7.3.2. Institutional Gender Sensitization
- Conduct regular gender sensitivity training.
- Ensure parity in editorial decision-making to bring diverse voices into content evaluation.
- Adopt internal protocols for covering sexual violence and issues of morality, moving away from voyeuristic narratives.
7.4. Platform Accountability: The Role of Big Tech
7.4.1. Localized Content Moderation and Transparency
- Recruit and train local language content moderators to understand context and prevent algorithmic amplification of culturally sensitive material.
- Implement regional ethics teams with sociologists, gender experts, and civil society members to flag problematic virality.
- Introduce a ‘red-flag virality’ system: When content related to sexual humiliation, blasphemy, or violence exceeds a threshold of reach in a short time, it should be paused for review.
7.4.2. Algorithmic Justice and Trauma Tags
- Trauma-sensitive filters and content warnings (similar to Instagram’s ‘sensitive content’ blur), especially for scenes of violence or shaming.
- User-centered data justice dashboards, where individuals can monitor how their data is used to shape their feed.
- Alternative engagement metrics beyond likes/shares, that encourage thoughtful consumption and not knee-jerk affective responses.
7.5. Civil Society, Counter-Narratives, and Collective Action
7.5.1. Building Feminist Digital Resistance
- Support intersectional digital literacy campaigns in rural and urban schools focused on understanding consent, surveillance, and emotional manipulation.
- Create safe feminist digital archives to document cases of digital humiliation and resistance.
- Encourage crowd-sourced content moderation through community reporting and support groups.
7.5.2. Trauma Care and Digital Counseling
- Anonymous trauma-reporting portals.
- Emergency counseling hotlines integrated into platforms like Facebook and TikTok for individuals targeted by viral attacks.
- Guided healing narratives to reframe one’s identity beyond the viral moment.
7.6. Education, Media Literacy, and Long-Term Cultural Change
7.6.1. Spectacle Literacy Curriculum
- Integrate critical media literacy into national syllabi.
- Encourage classroom discussions around gender, surveillance, affect, and resistance using local case studies (e.g., Nasirnagar, Ramu, Bhola incidents).
- Promote student-generated media campaigns that explore ethical storytelling and ‘slow media’ practices.
7.7. Policy Framework: A Rights-Based, Contextual Approach

- Freedom with Responsibility: Ensuring media freedom while countering harm.
- Participation without Surveillance: Safeguarding user dignity on digital platforms.
- Visibility with Consent: Restructuring digital infrastructures to guarantee agency in being seen.
- Empathy as Infrastructure: Designing policies and platforms to enable care, not just control.
7.8. Imagining a Post-Spectacle Digital Future
- Community storytelling collectives where marginalized individuals reclaim their narratives on their own terms.
- Slow media movements advocating deceleration in content circulation and resisting virality for virality’s sake.
- Decolonial media labs across South Asia where young creators craft media rooted in cultural memory, joy, resistance, and repair—not just reaction.
8. Final Conclusion and Scholarly Implications
8.1. Summary of Core Findings
8.2. Contributions to Scholarship
8.2.1. Media and Communication Studies
8.2.2. Gender Studies and Feminist Media Criticism
8.2.3. South Asian Studies and Postcolonial Theory
8.3. Theoretical Implications
- Algorithmic affectivity: Understanding algorithms as active agents shaping emotional contagions.
- Intersectional embodiment: Recognizing how gender, class, religion, and postcolonial histories mediate affective experiences.
- Capitalist commodification of trauma: Situating trauma not only as a psychological state but as a commodified media asset in capitalist economies.
8.4. Methodological Reflections
- Access to platform data and algorithmic transparency is limited.
- Emotional and embodied experiences are difficult to quantify, calling for further methodological innovation.
- Ethical concerns in researching traumatized subjects and sensitive digital content require ongoing reflexivity.
8.5. Practical and Policy Implications
- Regulatory reforms targeting algorithmic amplification and digital gender violence.
- Media literacy programs that foster critical affective engagement.
- Platform policies integrating trauma-sensitive design.
- Support for grassroots feminist digital activism in South Asia.
8.6. Limitations and Future Directions
- Geographic focus primarily on Bangladesh and select South Asian contexts.
- Limited longitudinal data on evolving platform algorithms.
- Potential language and access biases in digital ethnography.
8.7. Concluding Remarks: Toward Ethical Digital Publics
- Empathy and care rather than voyeurism and outrage.
- Contextual understanding of trauma within socio-political histories.
- Resistance to capitalist spectacle through feminist, decolonial, and affective justice frameworks.
References
- Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Routledge.
- Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Duke University Press. Ahmed, S. (2022). Digital panic and algorithmic rage: The affective economies of social media in Bangladesh. Journal of Digital Cultures, 8(2), 111–129.
- Ahmed, S. (2022). Spectacle, shame, and surveillance: The digital aftermath of moral panic in Bangladesh. South Asian Media Journal, 8(1), 29–52.
- Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Monthly Review Press.
- Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press. [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, S. (2013). Make me a man! Masculinity, Hinduism, and nationalism in India. SUNY Press.
- Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke University Press.
- Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The spectatorship of suffering. Sage.
- Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke University Press.
- Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacra and simulation. Semiotext (e).
- Berlant, L. (1997). The queen of America goes to Washington City: Essays on sex and citizenship. Duke University Press. [CrossRef]
- Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Duke University Press.
- Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso. Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed experience: Trauma, narrative, and history. Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. Columbia University Press.
- Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The spectatorship of suffering. Sage.
- Chowdhury, A. M. (2019). Spectacles of suffering: Trauma, capitalism and the Bangladeshi news media. Journal of South Asian Studies, 42(3), 211–225.
- Chowdhury, S. (2019). Televised grief: Spectacles of emotion in Bangladeshi media. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 42(3), 581–597.
- Clough, P. T., & Halley, J. (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Duke University Press.
- Dean, J. (2005). Communicative capitalism: Circulation and the foreclosure of politics. Cultural Politics, 1(1), 51–74. Cobb, S. (2011). Gossip, celebrity and panics: Affect and collective identity. Routledge. Crawford, K., & Paglen, T. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
- Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
- DataReportal. (2023).. Bangladesh Digital 2023. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-bangladesh.
- Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1992). Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Harvard University Press. Debord, G. (1994). The society of the spectacle. Zone Books. (Original work published 1967) Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist realism: Is there no alternative? Zero Books.
- Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Pantheon Books.
- Ghosh, S. (2011). Fire: A Queer Film Classic. Arsenal Pulp Press.
- Gill, R. (2007). Gender and the media. Polity.
- Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166.
- Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. J. (Eds.). (2010). The affect theory reader. Duke University Press.
- Han, B.-C. (2017). Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and new technologies of power. Verso. Hossain, M. (2020). Participatory surveillance and moral panic in digital Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Communication, 30(5), 421–438.
- Illouz, E. (2007). Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Polity Press.
- Kabir, A. (2015). Remembering 1971: Mediating trauma and nationalism in Bangladesh. Media, Culture & Society, 37(2), 229–244.
- Kaplan, E. A. (2005). Trauma culture: The politics of terror and loss in media and literature. Rutgers University Press.
- Karim, L. (2011). Microfinance and its discontents: Women in debt in Bangladesh. University of Minnesota Press.
- Kellner, D. (2004). 9/11, spectacles of terror, and media manipulation. Critical Discourse Studies, 1(1), 41–64.
- Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2007). Critical media literacy: Crucial policy choices for a global information age. Policy Futures in Education, 5(1), 59–69.
- Khan, S. (2021). Eroticized violence in Bangladeshi media: A feminist critique. Asian Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 9(1), 45–67.
- Khan, S., & Rahman, M. (2022). Spectacles of suffering: Trauma, virality, and violence in Bangladesh’s digital publics. Journal of Media Ethics, 37(3), 175–188.
- Khan, T. (2021). Media, morality, and panic: Bangladeshi television and the politics of shame. Cultural Politics, 17(2), 213–232.
- Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton University Press.
- Mankekar, P. (1999). Screening culture, viewing politics: An ethnography of television, womanhood, and nation in postcolonial India. Duke University Press.
- Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Duke University Press.
- Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. [CrossRef]
- Niranjana, T. (2007). Mobilizing India: Women, music, and migration between India and Trinidad. Duke University Press.
- Parveen, N. (2020). TikTok girls and digital backlash in Bangladesh. Media Asia, 47(4), 191–205.
- Rahman, A. (2023). TikTok, youth culture and panic politics in Bangladesh. Digital South Asia Journal, 5(1), 92–114.
- Rahman, M. S. (2023). Erotic economy and evidence cultures: Spectacular shame in Bangladeshi TikTok. South Asian Media Studies, 5(1), 33–49.
- Rajagopal, A. (2001). Politics after Television: Religious Nationalism and the Reshaping of the Indian Public. Cambridge University Press.
- Roy, A. (2013). The hanging of Afzal Guru and the strange case of the attack on the Indian Parliament. Penguin.
- Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267–319). Routledge.
- Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
- Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
- Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
- Sundaram, R. (2020). Technologies of the Self and Mobile Media in India. Cambridge University Press.
- Thussu, D. K. (2007). News as entertainment: The rise of global infotainment. SAGE. Ticktin, M. (2011). Casualties of care: Immigration and the politics of humanitarianism in France. University of California Press.
- Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13(1), 203–218. Uddin, M. (2018). Media framing and the Rohingya crisis in Bangladesh. Journal of International Communication, 24(2), 182–198.
- Udupa, S. (2018). Gaali cultures: The politics of abusive exchange on social media. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1506–1522. [CrossRef]
- Udupa, S., & Dattatreyan, E. (2020). Digital ethnography and the politics of affect in South Asia. Sage.
- UN Women. (2021). Online violence against women in Asia: A regional overview. Žižek, S. (2008). Violence: Six sideways reflections. Picador.
- Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).