Submitted:
03 June 2025
Posted:
05 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Optimization of Robot Operation and Maintenance Using Tribodiagnostic Methods
2.2. Transmission System
- Backlash-free motion: Due to minimal backlash, the movements are precise and repeatable, which is essential for accurate operations in robotics.
- High rigidity and durability: The combination of a robust bearing and reducer allows the transmission of high torques while maintaining stability and resistance to shocks, which is critical for applications such as exoskeletons or robotic arms.
- Compact and lightweight solution: The compact size and low weight are advantageous for mobile robotic systems, where every gram counts.
- Versatile use in various fields such as robotics, automation, engineering, navigation systems, industrial applications, and more.
2.3. Construction Proposal of the Measurement Test Rig
2.4. Verification of the Proposed Multi-Purpose Testing System
2.5. Cleanliness of Working Fluids (Lubricant) Contaminated with Solid Particles
- The first number represents the quantity of particles larger than 4 μm per millilitre of fluid;
- The second number represents the quantity of particles larger than 6 μm per millilitre of fluid;
- The third number represents the quantity of particles larger than 14 μm per millilitre of fluid.
2.6. The Principle of Sampling Working Lubricants for Contamination Analysis Purposes
- The lubricant sample must be taken from a representative part of the robotic system, specifically from each gear mechanism (joint), with the sample being taken from the individual positions on the test rig in this case.
- The lubricant sampling is performed at low speeds of the gear reducer and under operational temperature conditions to ensure sufficient homogeneity of the sample.
- During sampling, it is crucial to prevent contamination of the lubricant by any foreign substances or impurities.
- The sample must always be taken from the same location and in the same manner to ensure repeatability and comparability of the analysis results.
- Care must be taken to maintain the cleanliness of the surrounding area of the sampling point in order to eliminate the risk of secondary contamination of the sample.
3. Results
- Initial analysis of new (unfiltered) lubricant prior to testing;
- Analysis of lubricant contamination after 1 hour of testing without filtration;
- Analysis of lubricant contamination after 10 hours of testing without filtration;
- Analysis of lubricant contamination after 11 hours of testing and 1 hour of filtration;
- Analysis of lubricant contamination after 4 weeks of testing and 4 hours of filtration;
- Analysis of lubricant contamination after 8 weeks of testing and 8 hours of filtration;
- Analysis of lubricant contamination after 32 weeks of testing and 32 hours of filtration.
3.1. Lubricant Condition Analysis Prior to Test Rig Activation
3.1. Lubricant Condition Analysis After the First Hour of Gear Module Run-In
3.3. Lubricant Condition Analysis in Gear Module G1
3.4. Lubricant Condition Analysis in Gear Module G3
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- The research highlights a sharp rise in contamination during initial operation hours, stressing the need for timely intervention to avoid reduced gear module reliability.
- The study confirms that efficient filtration reduces failures, extends gearbox life, and lowers maintenance costs.
- A specialized test station was developed for assessing lubrication strategies, and online monitoring of tribological parameters was introduced to support predictive maintenance.
- The approach promotes environmental responsibility by minimizing waste and offers strong practical value in industries demanding high robotic system reliability.
- The study emphasizes the importance of addressing tribological components from the design phase through operation, supporting system reliability in robotics.
6. Patents
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tiboni, M.; Remino, C.; Bussola, R.; Amici, C. A Review on Vibration-Based Condition Monitoring of Rotating Machinery. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wieczorek, B.; Warguła, Ł.; Zharkevich, O.; Gierz, Ł.A.; Wojciechowski, Ł.; Perz, K. The Study of the Impact of Oil Type and Throttling Pressure on the Vibrations of a Gear Pump. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 2025, 19, 142–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keleşoğlu, C.; Küçük, H.; Demetgül, M. Fault Diagnosis of Bevel Gears Using Neural Pattern Recognition and MLP Neural Network Algorithms. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2020, 21, 843–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Hirani, H.; Agrawal, A.K. Online Condition Monitoring of Misaligned Meshing Gears Using Wear Debris and Oil Quality Sensors. Ind. Lubr. Tribol. 2018, 70, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoshioka, T.; Shimizu, S. Monitoring of Ball Bearing Operation under Grease Lubrication Using a New Compound Diagnostic System Detecting Vibration and Acoustic Emission. Tribol. Trans. 2009, 52, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farhat, M.H.; Gelman, L.; Conaghan, G.; Kluis, W.; Ball, A. Novel Diagnosis Technologies for a Lack of Oil Lubrication in Gearmotor Systems, Based on Motor Current Signature Analysis. Sensors 2022, 22, 9507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feng, K.; Ji, J.C.; Ni, Q.; Beer, M. A Review of Vibration-Based Gear Wear Monitoring and Prediction Techniques. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2023, 182, 109605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vashishtha, G.; Chauhan, S.; Sehri, M.; Zimroz, R.; Dumond, P.; Kumar, R.; Gupta, M.K. A Roadmap to Fault Diagnosis of Industrial Machines via Machine Learning: A Brief Review. Measurement 2025, 242, 116216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiboni, M.; Remino, C.; Bussola, R.; Amici, C. A Review on Vibration-Based Condition Monitoring of Rotating Machinery. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, B.; Wang, L. Study on Control System of Grease Lubrication. In Proceedings of the 2010 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation; IEEE: Jinan, China, July 2010; pp. 4240–4243. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, H.; Chen, Y.; Shangguan, L.; Cheng, R.; Li, Y.; Yang, C. Multi-Objective-Based Intelligent Lubrication System Performance Evaluation Technology for Construction Machinery. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chun, S.M. Network Analysis of an Engine Lubrication System. Tribol. Int. 2003, 36, 609–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, S.; Ma, B.; Zheng, C. A Unified System Residual Life Prediction Method Based on Selected Tribodiagnostic Data. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 44087–44096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Герасиди, В.В.; Лисаченкo, А.В. On the issue of the formation of tribodiagnostic models of ship WATERS in operation. Morskie Intellektualnye Tehnol. 2022, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murčinková, Z.; Živčák, J.; Sabol, D. Torsional Vibrations in the Resonance of High-Speed Rotor Bearings Reduced by Dynamic Properties of Carbon Fiber Polymer Composites. Materials 2023, 16, 3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Demčák, J.; Židek, K.; Krenický, T. Digital Twin for Monitoring the Experimental Assembly Process Using RFID Technology. Processes 2024, 12, 1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Yu, Z.; Fan, Z.; Wang, S.; Xiang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z. Sensor for a Solid–Liquid Tribological System. Sensors 2025, 25, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prada, E.; Varga, M.; Virgala, I.; Mikova, Ľ.; Kelemen, M. Model – based methodology for designing automated workplaces. MM Sci. J. 2023, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y. A Facile Approach to Fabricate a Stabilized Slippery Lubricant-Infused Porous Surface with Dynamic Omniphobicity for Self-Cleaning. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 23621–23628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aerospace Industries Association. NAS 1638: Cleanliness Requirements of Parts Used in Hydraulic Systems (Revision 4), 2011. National Aerospace Standard.
- International Organization for Standardization ISO 4406:2021. Hydraulic fluid power — Fluids — Method for coding the level of contamination by solid particles Edition 4, published January 2021.
- U.S. Navy. (2006). NAVAIR 01-1A-17: Technical Manual Organizational, Intermediate and Depot Maintenance Aviation Hydraulics Manual (Change 2, August 1), 2014. Naval Air Systems Command.
- Khan, S.; Dyrstad-Cincotta, N.; Nasah, J.; Bhat, A.; Rickson, J.; Mann, M. Electrostatic Lubricant Filter Design Study. 2022 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP). Denver, CO, USA, 2022; pp. 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gan, C.; Liang, T.; Li, X. Current and Candidate Additives for Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants—A Review. Tribol. Int. 2020, 146, 106768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Hajj, A. Condition-Based Monitoring on High-Precision Gearbox for Robotic Applications. Shock and Vibration 2022, Article ID 6653723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]












| Cleanliness Class | Particle Size | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code ISO 4406 | NAS 1638 | 2-5 (μm) | 5-15 (μm) | 15-25 (μm) | 25-50 (μm) | 50-100 (μm) | >100 (μm) |
| 12/10/7 | 1 | 2 500 | 500 | 89 | 16 | 3 | 1 |
| 13/11/8 | 2 | 5 000 | 1 000 | 178 | 32 | 6 | 1 |
| 14/12/9 | 3 | 10 000 | 2 000 | 365 | 63 | 11 | 2 |
| 15/13/10 | 4 | 20 000 | 4 000 | 712 | 126 | 22 | 4 |
| 16/14/11 | 5 | 40 000 | 8 000 | 1 425 | 253 | 45 | 8 |
| 17/15/12 | 6 | 80 000 | 16 000 | 2 850 | 506 | 90 | 16 |
| 18/16/13 | 7 | 160 000 | 32 000 | 5 700 | 1 012 | 180 | 32 |
| 19/17/14 | 8 | 320 000 | 64 000 | 11 400 | 2 025 | 360 | 64 |
| 20/18/15 | 9 | 640 000 | 128 000 | 22 800 | 4 050 | 720 | 128 |
| 21/19/16 | 10 | 1 280 000 | 256 000 | 45 600 | 8 100 | 1 440 | 256 |
| 22/20/17 | 11 | 2 560 000 | 512 000 | 91 200 | 16 200 | 2880 | 512 |
| 23/21/18 | 12 | 5 120 000 | 1 024 000 | 182 400 | 32 400 | 5760 | 1024 |
| Type of System / Application Environment/ Components Used | Recommended Cleanliness Class According to ISO 4406 |
|---|---|
| Systems with servo components sensitive to fine contamination | 15/13/10 |
Industrial hydraulics
|
17/15/12 |
Industrial and mobile hydraulics
|
18/15/12 19/16/14 |
| Industrial and mobile equipment not requiring high fluid cleanliness | 20/16/15 |
| Pressurized circulating lubrication of gearboxes | 18/16/13 |
Pumps/Drives
|
18/16/13 19/17/13 20/18/15 19/17/14 |
Valves
|
20/18/15 19/17/14 19/17/14 20/18/15 18/16/13 16/14/11 |
| Chemical Element |
Optigear ALR 150 |
Lubricant in G1 |
Lubricant in G2 |
Lubricant in G3 |
Lubricant in G4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Al | 0.36 | 1.68 | 1.75 | 0.86 | 3.25 |
| B | 4.78 | 0.94 | 2.8 | 0.73 | 2.66 |
| Ba | 0.25 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.50 | 0.96 |
| Ca | 0.06 | 11.20 | 13.95 | 9.92 | 12.59 |
| Cd | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0 |
| Cr | 0.25 | 0.73 | 1.06 | 0.49 | 1.79 |
| Cu | 0 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.11 | 0.53 |
| Fe | 0.33 | 36.61 | 40.72 | 19.60 | 32.88 |
| K | 0.01 | 0.98 | 0.45 | 0.18 | 0.52 |
| Mg | 2.54 | 4.11 | 4.26 | 3.12 | 3.96 |
| Mn | 0.02 | 2.31 | 4.33 | 0.82 | 2.72 |
| Mo | 0.41 | 29.17 | 12.84 | 13.89 | 12.75 |
| Na | 0 | 6.52 | 7.57 | 0.80 | 5.99 |
| Ni | 0 | 1.0 | 0.98 | 0.59 | 1.02 |
| P | 1627.0 | 1434.0 | 1458.5 | 1477.0 | 1475.5 |
| Pb | 0 | 0.20 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.30 |
| Sb | 1.9 | 4.08 | 7.10 | 7.72 | 6.20 |
| Si | 0.18 | 23.28 | 21.65 | 19.40 | 16.73 |
| Sn | 1.88 | 1.89 | 1.23 | 0.59 | 1.32 |
| Ti | 0.71 | 1.12 | 1.03 | 1.19 | 1.04 |
| V | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.70 |
| Zn | 0 | 25.80 | 19.82 | 6.4 | 20.28 |
| Modul G1 | Modul G2 | Modul G3 | Modul G4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part/1 ml >4μm(c): 132 981.6 24 >6μm(c): 36 568.9 22 >8μm(c): 2 700.6 19 |
Part/1 ml >4μm(c): 9 762.7 20 >6μm(c): 8 695.1 20 >8μm(c): 1 775.9 18 |
Part/1 ml >4μm(c): 33 504.6 22 >6μm(c): 30 250.9 22 >8μm(c): 4 711.0 19 |
Part/1 ml >4μm(c): 291 689.4 25 >6μm(c): 78 166.6 23 >8μm(c): 2 451.3 18 |
| Stage of Measurement Interval | ISO 4406 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| > 4μm Part/1ml |
Class | > 6μm Part/1ml |
Class | > 14μm Part/1ml |
Class | Final class | |
| New lubricating oil | 14 208 | 21 | 3 413 | 19 | 78 | 13 | 21/19/13 |
| After 1 hour of testing without filtration | 132 088 | 24 | 36 568 | 22 | 2 703 | 19 | 24/22/19 |
| After 10 hours of testing without filtration | 393 088 | 26 | 92 732 | 24 | 3 662 | 19 | 26/24/19 |
| After 11 hours of testing and 1 hour of filtration | 277 427 | 25 | 63 464 | 23 | 2 246 | 18 | 25/23/18 |
| After 4 weeks of testing and 4 hours of filtration | 136 240 | 24 | 32 291 | 22 | 1 132 | 17 | 24/22/17 |
| After 8 weeks of testing and 8 hours of filtration | 73 600 | 23 | 18 626 | 21 | 490 | 16 | 23/21/16 |
| After 32 weeks of testing and 32 hours of filtration | 3 858 | 19 | 943 | 17 | 59 | 13 | 19/17/13 |
| Chemical Element |
New lubricating oil |
After 1 hour without filtration |
After 11 hours and 1 hour of filtration |
After 4 weeks and 4 hours of filtration |
After 8 weeks and 8 hours of filtration |
After 32 weeks and 32 hours of filtration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.02 |
| Al | 0.36 | 1.68 | 0.91 | 1.19 | 0.9 | 0.43 |
| B | 4.78 | 0.94 | 0.57 | 0.75 | 2.3 | 0.27 |
| Ba | 0.25 | 0.85 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.4 | 0.46 |
| Ca | 0.06 | 11.20 | 7.64 | 7.84 | 6.9 | 5.19 |
| Cd | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0 | 0.02 |
| Cr | 0.25 | 0.73 | 0.45 | 0.56 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Cu | 0 | 0.74 | 0.32 | 0.45 | 0.3 | 0.06 |
| Fe | 0.33 | 36.61 | 23.39 | 20.31 | 19.7 | 2.96 |
| K | 0.01 | 0.98 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.2 | 0.04 |
| Mg | 2.54 | 4.11 | 3.48 | 3.47 | 3.2 | 3.22 |
| Mn | 0.02 | 2.31 | 1.46 | 1.36 | 1.1 | 0.58 |
| Mo | 0.41 | 29.17 | 20.68 | 18.68 | 12.7 | 10.19 |
| Na | 0 | 6.52 | 3.21 | 3.12 | 1.7 | 0.85 |
| Ni | 0 | 1.0 | 0.06 | 0.45 | 0.9 | 0.04 |
| P | 1627.0 | 1434.0 | 1490.5 | 1433.5 | 1514.0 | 1407.0 |
| Pb | 0 | 0.20 | 0.39 | 0.12 | 0.3 | 0.18 |
| Sb | 1.9 | 4.08 | 3.21 | 2.98 | 2.6 | 8.01 |
| Si | 0.18 | 23.28 | 14.3 | 14.57 | 10.3 | 7.41 |
| Sn | 1.88 | 1.89 | 1.42 | 1.11 | 1.1 | 1.46 |
| Ti | 0.71 | 1.12 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.8 | 0.69 |
| V | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.2 | 0.66 |
| Zn | 0 | 25.80 | 14.21 | 14.58 | 8.6 | 4.13 |
| Stage of Measurement Interval | ISO 4406 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| > 4μm Part/1ml |
Class | > 6μm Part/1ml |
Class | > 14μm Part/1ml |
Class | Final class | |
| New lubricating oil | 14 208 | 21 | 3 413 | 19 | 78 | 13 | 21/19/13 |
| After 1 hour of testing without filtration | 33 504 | 22 | 30 250 | 22 | 4 711 | 19 | 22/22/19 |
| After 10 hours of testing without filtration | 79 123 | 27 | 232 354 | 25 | 8 694 | 20 | 27/25/20 |
| After 11 hours of testing and 1 hour of filtration | 603 400 | 26 | 186 233 | 25 | 5 292 | 20 | 26/25/20 |
| After 4 weeks of testing and 4 hours of filtration | 354 996 | 26 | 98 319 | 24 | 2 486 | 18 | 26/24/18 |
| After 8 weeks of testing and 8 hours of filtration | 251 234 | 25 | 63 319 | 23 | 1 414 | 18 | 25/23/18 |
| After 32 weeks of testing and 32 hours of filtration | 50 560 | 23 | 12 583 | 21 | 568 | 16 | 23/21/16 |
| Chemical Element |
New lubricating oil |
After 1 hour without filtration |
After 11 hours and 1 hour of filtration |
After 4 weeks and 4 hours of filtration |
After 8 weeks and 8 hours of filtration |
After 32 weeks and 32 hours of filtration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Al | 0.36 | 0.86 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.46 |
| B | 4.78 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.34 |
| Ba | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.36 | 0.44 |
| Ca | 0.06 | 9.92 | 9.43 | 9.49 | 6.13 | 6.61 |
| Cd | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.05 |
| Cr | 0.25 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 0.23 |
| Cu | 0 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.04 |
| Fe | 0.33 | 19.60 | 14.65 | 14.99 | 14.50 | 2.63 |
| K | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0 |
| Mg | 2.54 | 3.12 | 3.14 | 3.16 | 3.01 | 3.33 |
| Mn | 0.02 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.56 | 0.45 |
| Mo | 0.41 | 13.89 | 12.89 | 12.32 | 8.22 | 8.24 |
| Na | 0 | 0.80 | 1.09 | 1.25 | 0.75 | 0.17 |
| Ni | 0 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.55 | 0.02 |
| P | 1627.0 | 1477.0 | 1473.50 | 1483.0 | 1502.5 | 1384.5 |
| Pb | 0 | 0.32 | 0.49 | 0.73 | 0.02 | 0.53 |
| Sb | 1.9 | 7.72 | 6.15 | 3.95 | 5.25 | 8.78 |
| Si | 0.18 | 19.40 | 12.66 | 12.64 | 8.90 | 8.20 |
| Sn | 1.88 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 1.7 | 0.78 | 1.05 |
| Ti | 0.71 | 1.19 | 1.30 | 1.27 | .116 | 0.71 |
| V | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.26 | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.50 |
| Zn | 0 | 6.4 | 4.65 | 4.55 | 4.89 | 3.04 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).