Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Thermostable D-Allulose 3-Epimerase for Long-Term Food-Compatible Continuous Production Systems

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

03 June 2025

Posted:

03 June 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
D-allulose is a rare sugar with promising applications in food and health industries, owing to its low caloric value and multiple health benefits. In this study, we systematically investigated a thermostable D-allulose 3-epimerase (TcDAEase) from Thermogemmatispora carboxidivorans for food-compatible continuous production. The enzyme exhibited remarkable thermostability, with over 70% activity retained at 80 °C, and showed broad pH tolerance across the range of 8.0 to 13.0. Notably, TcDAEase exhibited high catalytic activity toward D-allulose and D-fructose even without addition of metal ions. Moreover, Food-grade Mg2+ was identified as enhancing enzyme activity by 14.3%, thus ensuring compliance with GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) standards for food applications. To improve industrial applicability, the enzyme was immobilized using a chitosan-diatomaceous earth (DE) matrix via a three-step adsorption–crosslinking–embedding strategy. The immobilized TcDAEase achieved 48.7% ± 2.4% activity recovery and retained 90.3% ± 1.5% activity over seven reaction cycles. Furthermore, continuous production of D-allulose was realized in a packed-bed reactor, operating stably at 60 °C, pH 8.0 and 5 mM Mg2+ for 150 days, producing 756 kg of D-allulose with a conversion yield exceeding 89.7% of the theoretical maximum. Overall, this study provides a feasible strategy for the continuous and efficient production of high value-added D-allulose in the food industry.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

In recent decades, the global prevalence of metabolic disorders such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases has surged, primarily due to high-fat and high-sugar dietary patterns[1,2]. In response, consumer preferences have shifted toward healthier sweetening alternatives, including erythritol, acesulfame and stevia, which offer low- or zero-calorie profiles [3,4]. Among them, D-allulose (also known as D-psicose), a rare monosaccharide and the C-3 epimer of D-fructose, has garnered increasing attention owing to its favorable nutritional and physiological properties. D-allulose retains approximately 70% of the sweetness of sucrose while providing only 0.4 kcal/g of energy. In addition to its low caloric contribution, D-allulose has been shown to offer a range of health benefits, such as anti-obesity effects [5], modulation of cholesterol metabolism [6] and support for gut microbiota homeostasis [7]. These attributes position D-allulose as a highly promising functional sweetener for food and nutraceutical applications [8].
Despite its advantages, D-allulose is scarce in nature and its chemical synthesis typically requires harsh conditions and generates undesirable byproducts, limiting scalability [9,10]. As a result, biocatalytic methods offer a cleaner, more sustainable, and cost-effective route [11]. Among these, enzymatic conversion using ketose 3-epimerases, particularly D-tagatose 3-epimerase (DTEase, EC 5.1.3.31) and D-allulose 3-epimerase (DAEase, EC 5.1.3.30)has become the most viable industrial-scale production method for D-allulose [12].
To date, more than 20 microbial DAEases have been identified from various genera such as Arthrobacter globiformis M30 [13], Clostridium bolteae [14], Ruminococcus sp.[15] and Bacillus subtilis [16] with their catalytic properties summarized in Table 1. However, most of these enzymes display limited thermostability, with optimal activity typically below 50 °C. This low-temperature requirement constrains their application in high-temperature processes, which are desirable in industry for improving substrate solubility, reducing viscosity and suppressing microbial contamination [17]. Furthermore, many reported DAEases require divalent metal cofactors such as Co2+ or Mn2+ for activation. These ions, despite their catalytic roles, are either toxic or disallowed in food processing, thereby limiting the practical use of such enzymes in food-related manufacturing processes [18]. Consequently, there remains a pressing need for the discovery and engineering of novel DAEases that combine high thermostability with activation by food-grade metal ions such as Mg2+ or Ca2+.
In recent years, various immobilization strategies have been explored to improve the performance of DAEases [19], yet challenges remain. Li et al. [20] developed a DNA-origami-based co-immobilization platform integrating DAEase and glucose isomerase, enabling one-pot cascade conversion of glucose to D-allulose with minimal byproduct formation (reduced by approximately 80%). Tang et al. [21] reported a ZnCo-MOF-based immobilized DAEase with enhanced thermostability (80% activity retention at 70 °C) and reusability (over 95% after 8 cycles), attributed to Zn2+/Co2+ coordination-induced structural stabilization. However, the high cost and complexity of such nanomaterials limit their industrial applicability. Alternatively, several studies have explored traditional immobilization platforms, such as chitopearl beads and ion-exchange resins [13,22], enabling medium-term continuous operation for 60-120 days. Nevertheless, few systems have demonstrated stable catalytic performance beyond 100 days under food-compatible conditions, underscoring the need for robust and durable immobilized biocatalysts.
In this study, we characterized and immobilized a novel thermostable D-allulose 3-epimerase (TcDAEase) from Thermogemmatispora carboxidivorans. The enzyme exhibited high catalytic efficiency, remarkable thermostability, and activation by GRAS-approved Mg2+, thereby satisfying key requirements for industrial application. A cost-effective immobilization strategy based on chitosan and diatomaceous earth was further developed, enabling long-term continuous production of D-allulose in a packed-bed reactor over 150 days. This work provides a scalable and sustainable solution to the enzyme and process level limitations in the production of D-allulose.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Strains

TcDAEase gene (NCBI accession: WP_052889376.1) was synthesized by General Biologicals Corporation (Anhui, China). Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) was utilized as the host strain for recombinant expression and was obtained from Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). Substrates including D-allulose, D-tagatose, D-sorbose, and D-fructose were sourced from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The diatomaceous earth carrier was supplied by Yuantong Mineral Products Co. (Jilin, China), and chitosan was purchased from Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co. (Shanghai, China). All other analytical-grade reagents were acquired from Tokyo Chemical Industry (TCI), Acros Organics, and Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd.

2.2. Amino Acid Sequence Alignment

Multiple sequence alignment of TcDAEase with other reported D-allulose 3-epimerases was conducted using Clustal Omega to identify conserved catalytic residues and structural stability. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA X via the maximum likelihood method with 1000 bootstrap replications to assess evolutionary relationships and statistical confidence.

2.3. Gene Cloning, Expression and Purification of TcDAEase

The gene sequence for TcDAEase (NCBI ID: WP_052889376.1) was inserted into the pET22b (+) vector to construct the pET22b-TcDAEase recombinant plasmid, which was subsequently introduced into E. coli BL21 (DE3) for heterologous expression. Pre-cultures were grown in 100 mL Luria–Bertani (LB) medium supplemented with 50 μg/mL ampicillin at 37 °C 200 rpm overnight. The seed culture was then inoculated (2% v/v) into 100 mL auto-induction Terrific Broth (15 g/L tryptone, 25 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L NaCl, 2 g/L glucose, 3 g/L lactose). Cultures were incubated at 37 °C until OD₆₀₀ reached 0.6, then shifted to 25 °C for 24 h to enhance protein yield. Cells were harvested via centrifugation (8000 rpm, 4 °C, 20 min), lysed by ultrasonic disruption (60% amplitude, 1 s on/2 s off, 10 min on ice), and the lysate was clarified by centrifugation and 0.22 μm filtration. The supernatant was purified using a 5 mL nickel-affinity chromatography column equilibrated with 50 mM phosphate buffer (500 mM NaCl, pH 8.0). The enzyme was eluted using a linear imidazole gradient (0-500 mM), concentrated via centrifugal ultrafiltration (22 kDa MWCO), and dialyzed against 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 8.0). SDS-PAGE with Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining was employed to confirm protein size and purity.

2.4. Enzyme Assay

Enzymatic activity was measured in 1.0 mL reactions containing 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) and 50 g/L D-fructose. Reactions were initiated by adding purified enzyme and incubated at 60 °C for 5 min. Termination was achieved by adding 100 μL of 1 M HCl and immediately freezing at -80 °C. Sugar concentrations were analyzed via HPLC equipped with a refractive index (RI) detector, using a calcium-form carbohydrate column (Benson Polymeric, USA) at 80 °C with deionized water as the mobile phase (flow rate: 0.6 mL/min). The sample injection volume was 10 μL, the total run time was 20 min. Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford assay, and one unit (U) of enzymatic activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to generate 1 μmol of D-allulose per minute under the specified conditions. All measurements were performed in triplicate and reported as mean ± SD.

2.5. Biological Characteristics of TcDAEase

To simulate native conditions relevant to food-compatible applications, no metal chelation pretreatment was employed. Optimal temperature was determined by performing assays at 50-90 °C in 10 °C increments, while thermostability was evaluated by pre-incubating enzyme samples (without substrate) at 60, 70, and 80 °C in phosphate buffer, followed by activity measurement at intervals up to 8 hours.
The pH dependence was assessed using five buffer systems (50 mM): citrate-phosphate (pH 4.0-5.0), phosphate (pH 6.0-8.0), glycine-NaOH (pH 9.0-10.0), carbonate (pH 11.0), and KCl-NaOH (pH 12.0-13.0). Enzyme pH stability was tested by 6 h incubation at 60 °C across these buffers.
To evaluate metal ion effects, divalent cations (1 mM final concentration; Fe2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+) were added individually. Additionally, the Mg2+ dose-dependence was assessed at 0-25 mM concentrations to determine its catalytic enhancement profile.

2.6. Substrate Specificity and Kinetic Parameters

The substrate specificity of TcDAEase was evaluated against four ketohexose substrates: D-fructose, D-allulose, D-sorbose and D-tagatose. Each reaction was conducted under the standard assay conditions (60 °C, pH 8.0), and the specific activities for each substrate were determined. The relative activity was calculated by setting the activity toward D-fructose as 100%. For kinetic analysis, initial reaction rates were measured at varying concentrations of D-fructose ranging from 5 to 300 mM. The Michaelis–Menten kinetic parameters, including the Michaelis constant (Km), turnover number (kcat), and catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km), were determined by nonlinear regression fitting of the rate data to the Michaelis–Menten equation using OriginPro 9.0. All assays were performed in triplicate, and results were expressed as mean ± SD.

2.7. TcDAEase Immobilization Procedure

The bacteria used for enzyme immobilization were cultivated as described in Section 2.2. A three-step adsorption–crosslinking–embedding approach was employed using a chitosan–diatomaceous earth (DE) composite as the support matrix. Briefly, chitosan (10 g/L) was dissolved in 1% (v/v) acetic acid with constant stirring. Diatomaceous earth (100 g/L) and glutaraldehyde (0.5 g/L) were added, and the pH was adjusted to 4.5 using 1 M NaOH to activate the support. Wet biomass was then added at the desired concentration, followed by gentle stirring at 25 °C for 1 h to facilitate adsorption. Chitosan precipitation was induced by gradually adjusting the pH using either 1 M NaOH or 1.4 M Na2SO4 to reach one of three target pH ranges: acidic (5.0-6.0), neutral (6.5-7.0) or alkaline (10.0-11.0). To enhance mechanical strength, 1.4 M Na2SO4 was used for osmotic dehydration, after which the immobilized material was filtered, washed thoroughly with deionized water, and dried at 60 °C for 2 h until a constant weight was achieved. The final immobilized enzyme preparation was stored at 4 °C until use. To optimize immobilization efficiency and operational stability, three key parameters were systematically investigated. The effects of wet cell loading (5-30 g/L), chitosan precipitation pH (5.0-6.0, 6.5-7.0, and 10.0-11.0), and chitosan concentration (5-40 g/L) were investigated. For each condition, protein loading capacity and activity recovery were quantified. The enzyme activity of the immobilized preparations was determined under standard assay conditions. The activity recovery (%) of the immobilized TcDAEase was calculated as the ratio between the specific activity (U·g-1) of the immobilized preparation and that of the corresponding amount of free wet cells. Breakpoint analysis and first-order kinetic fitting were applied to model saturation and decay trends for protein loading and catalytic activity, respectively.

2.8. Characterization of Immobilized TcDAEase

The biochemical performance of the immobilized enzyme was evaluated following the same methodology as used for the free enzyme. Specifically, temperature profiles were measured at 50-90 °C, while pH activity profiles were assessed at 60 °C using the buffer systems described in Section 2.5. Operational stability was evaluated through repeated batch conversions. In each cycle, immobilized TcDAEase was incubated in 50 g/L D-fructose solution (pH 8.0, containing 5 mM MgCl2) at 60 °C with shaking at 100 rpm for 2 h. After each cycle, the catalyst was recovered by centrifugation, washed with phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) and reused. This procedure was repeated for seven consecutive cycles. The residual activity was calculated based on the initial activity measured in the first batch, which was set as 100%.

2.8. Production of D-Allulose by a Continuous Packed-Bed Reactor

A jacketed packed-bed column reactor (2.0 cm inner diameter × 30 cm height) was filled with 30 g of immobilized TcDAEase (particle size 0.5-1.0 mm; bulk density ~0.7 g/mL). The system was maintained at a constant temperature of 60 °C using a circulating water-ethanol bath (70:30 v/v). The substrate solution, comprising 500 g/L D-fructose and 5 mM MgCl₂ in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0), was pumped through the reactor at a flow rate of 30 mL/min, resulting in an empty-bed residence time (EBRT) of 1.3 min. Effluent samples were collected every 24 h, filtered through 0.22 μm membranes, and analyzed by HPLC as described in Section 2.4 to determine substrate conversion and residual enzyme activity.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Amino Acid Sequence Alignment of TcDAEase

TcDAEase exhibited considerable sequence divergence from previously characterized DAEases. As shown in Figure 1, TcDAEase shared amino acid sequence identities from12.0% to 48.08% with other known DAEases, with the highest similarity observed for the enzyme derived from Arthrobacter globiformis. Domain architecture analysis classified TcDAEase as a member of the xylose isomerase-like family (IPR036237). Multiple sequence alignment (Figure 2) revealed several conserved residues that are functionally important for the isomerization of D-fructose [40]. These include Glu149, Asp182, His208, and Glu243 [33], which participate in metal ion coordination, and residues Glu156, His185, and Arg214, which are involved in anchoring the O1, O2, and O3 positions of D-fructose [34]. These findings suggest that TcDAEase preserves the core structural features essential for efficient ketose epimerization.

3.2. Recombinant Expression and Biochemical Characterization of TcDAEase

The TcDAEase gene was successfully overexpressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) and purified to homogeneity via Ni2+-NTA chromatography. As shown in Figure 3 and Figure S1, the SDS-PAGE analysis revealed a distinct protein band at approximately 33 kDa, this result is consistent with the calculated molecular mass of 33.7 kDa. Notably, the purified enzyme retained high catalytic activity (7.9 ± 0.3 U·mg⁻¹) in the absence of externally supplemented metal ions, suggesting that essential cofactors may have remained bound during expression and purification. A similar phenomenon has also been observed in DAEases from Arthrobacter globiformis M30 [13] and Clostridium bolteae [14], which exhibited baseline activity under metal-free conditions, although their maximal activity was achieved upon Co2+ addition. This intrinsic activity highlights the enzyme's potential for food-compliant biocatalysis.

3.3. Thermostability, pH Tolerance and Metal Ion Dependence

The enzymatic properties of TcDAEase were evaluated under the conditions described in Section 2.4. As shown in Figure 4a, TcDAEase exhibited optimal activity at 80 °C and retained over 70% of its activity within the 60-90 °C range. Thermal inactivation analysis (Figure 4b) revealed half-lives of 720 min at 60 °C, 300 min at 70 °C, and 40 min at 80 °C, indicating superior thermostability compared to most previously reported DAEases. As summarized in Table 1, TcDAEase outperformed other DAEases in terms of thermal resistance, underscoring its potential for high-temperature industrial applications.
In terms of pH tolerance, TcDAEase displayed a broad activity profile with an optimum at pH 10.0. Notably, more than 70% of its maximal activity was retained across the pH range of 8.0–13.0, whereas activity declined sharply below pH 5.0 (Figure 4c). Long-term pH stability tests (Figure 4d) showed that the enzyme remained stable after 6 h incubation at 60 °C between pH 7.0 and 9.0. Although TcDAEase tolerated strongly alkaline conditions, maintaining the reaction environment below pH 9.0 is advisable to avoid non-enzymatic browning, particularly in food-related processes [41].
The effects of various metal ions on enzymatic activity were assessed by supplementing 1 mM of different divalent cations (Figure 4e). Among them, Ni2+, Co2+, and Mg2+ enhanced catalytic activity by 30.3%, 20.2%, and 14.3%, respectively. While Ni2+ exhibited the strongest activation effect, its toxicity and regulatory limitations preclude its application in food-grade systems [18]. In contrast, Mg2+ is FDA-GRAS approved and thus suitable for industrial use. Further investigations on Mg2+ concentration (Figure 4f) revealed that enzymatic activity increased with Mg2+ concentration and plateaued beyond 5 mM. Accordingly, 5 mM Mg2+ was selected as the optimal cofactor concentration for continuous D-allulose production.

3.4. Substrate Specificity and Kinetic Parameters

The substrate specificity of TcDAEase was evaluated using four ketohexoses: D-allulose, D-fructose, D-tagatose, and D-sorbose. As shown in Figure 5, TcDAEase exhibited the highest specific activity toward D-allulose (15.9 ± 0.2 U·mg⁻¹), followed by D-fructose, D-tagatose, and D-sorbose. This substrate preference supports the hypothesis of a conserved epimerization mechanism among DAEases and is consistent with previous reports on enzymes from Arthrobacter globiformis M30 [13], Clostridium scindens [30], Ruminococcus sp. [15], Clostridium sp. [29], and Corynebacterium glutamicum [36], all of which showed a similar catalytic bias toward D-allulose. These findings indicate a conserved substrate recognition pattern among DAEases that likely underpins a shared catalytic mechanism [42].
The kinetic parameters of TcDAEase toward D-fructose were further determined by Michaelis–Menten analysis. The enzyme exhibited a Km of 260.9 ± 7.4 mM, a kcat of 96.6 ± 0.5 s⁻¹, and a catalytic efficiency kcat/Km of 0.38 ± 0.02 s⁻¹·mM⁻¹. A comparison with previously reported DAEases (Table 2) shows that while the kinetic performance of TcDAEase is comparable to other characterized enzymes, its combination of high activity and exceptional thermostability renders it a promising biocatalyst for large-scale, continuous D-allulose production in industrial settings.

3.5. Immobilization Optimization and Stability Assessment of TcDAease

To achieve large-scale production of D-allulose, we optimized the immobilization process for TcDAEase and used whole-cell immobilization techniques while circumventing the cost of enzyme purification by using the natural permeability of E. coli membranes to small molecule substrates [43,44]. Drawing on immobilization studies of glucose isomerase [45,46], we developed a diatomite–chitosan composite carrier that integrates the high mechanical strength of diatomaceous earth with the strong binding capacity of chitosan. The adsorption-crosslinking-embedding process was finely controlled by adjusting pH conditions. Specifically, we used glutaraldehyde pretreatment at pH 3.0 to ensure uniform dispersion of the carrier materials, adjusted the pH to 4.5 to promote adsorption and cross-linking of the cells, and finally adjusted the pH over 5.0, a gradual alkalinisation promoted the precipitation of chitosan. Besides, the composite carrier was optimized for compatibility with packed-bed reactor applications.
We first focus on the optimization of chitosan. Chitosan is a bio-compatible binder that enhances the mechanical robustness of the matrix and prevents leaching of enzymes during manipulation. To improve the operational stability and reproducibility of the immobilized enzyme, three key parameters were systematically evaluated: wet cell loading, chitosan precipitation pH, and chitosan concentration. As shown in Figure 6a, protein loading increased linearly with cell concentration in the range of 0.5-1.52 g/100 mL (slope = 10.3 ± 0.8 mg/100 mL). Beyond this range, loading efficiency declined sharply (slope = 1.8 ± 0.3 mg/100 mL). Breakpoint analysis identified a critical saturation threshold at 1.52 ± 0.10 g/100 mL, which is consistent with the surface saturation of the carrier material [47]. In parallel, enzyme activity recovery exhibited first-order decay kinetics (k = 0.45 ± 0.05). And the half-maximal activity observed at 1.54 g/100 mL, which closely aligning with the protein loading saturation point. This strong correlation suggests that excessive cell density hinders the effective utilization of the enzyme by restricting the diffusion of crosslinking agents [48]. Additionally, spatial constraints at high cell densities may induce conformational distortions that impede substrate access and ultimately reduce catalytic efficiency [49]. According to these results, 1.5 g/100 mL was selected as the optimal cell loading, yielding a protein loading of 23 ± 0.8 mg/g and approximately 50% activity recovery. This condition offered a balanced trade-off between carrier utilization and enzyme performance. In addition, the pH for chitosan precipitation was identified as a critical factor influencing immobilization efficiency. We embedded them in three pH intervals, acidic (5.0-6.0), neutral (6.5-7.0) and basic (10.0-11.0). Although chitosan’s theoretical precipitation pKa is ~6.3, partial gelation was observed even at pH 5.0-6.0, which likely due to localized pH fluctuations during NaOH titration under vigorous stirring. As shown in Figure 6b, immobilized TcDAEase prepared at pH 5.0-6.0, 6.5-7.0 and 10.0-11.0 exhibited activities of 1.4 ± 0.3, 6.7 ± 0.2 and 6.1 ± 0.2 U·g-1, corresponding to activity recoveries of 19 ± 0.5%, 49 ± 1.2% and 41 ± 1.3%, respectively. These results indicate that neutral to mildly alkaline conditions significantly enhanced catalytic performance, likely due to improved chitosan precipitation and network formation. In contrast, excessively alkaline conditions may result in over-crosslinking, which can impair enzyme conformation or hinder substrate diffusion [50]. Overall, a neutral pH range (6.5-7.0) was found to provide optimal precipitation efficiency and enzymatic activity, potentially due to the favorable protonation state of chitosan for controlled gelation and Schiff base (CH=N) formation [51].The concentration of chitosan is also one of the key factors affecting performance. Too low concentration can result in an insufficiently intact matrix, which can weaken the particle strength. Conversely, too high a concentration will result in the formation of a dense gel, which will limit matrix diffusion and thus reduce apparent activity [52]. As shown in Figure 6c,d, the highest initial activity (9.7 ± 0.9 U·g-1) was observed at a chitosan concentration of 5 g/L. However, poor operational stability was noted under this condition, with rapid activity decay (k = 0.24 ± 0.02 cycle-1, t1/2 = 2.9 cycles, R2= 0.98). In contrast, increasing the chitosan concentration to 10 g/L significantly enhanced stability (k = 0.01 ± 0.003 cycle-1, t1/2 = 69.3 cycles, R2 = 0.91). Under these optimized conditions, 90.3 ± 1.5% of the initial activity was retained after seven consecutive cycles. This corresponds to a 24-fold reduction in the rate of inactivation compared to the 5 g/L condition. These improvements align with previous findings suggesting that a critical chitosan concentration (~8 g/L) is required to establish a percolation threshold for network formation on silica-based supports [53].
In summary, under optimized conditions (wet cell loading: 15 g/L; precipitation pH: 6.5–7.0; chitosan concentration: 10 g/L), the immobilized TcDAEase achieved 49 ± 1.2% activity recovery and demonstrated favorable mechanical integrity. As shown in Figure 7, the enzyme prepared via the three-step method exhibited excellent operational stability, with no detectable protein leaching after drying and repeated washing at 60 °C. These findings confirm the successful formation of a robust immobilization matrix, whose particles after filtration are shown in Figure S2.

3.6. Biochemical Properties of the Immobilized TcDAEase

The biochemical properties of immobilized TcDAEase were evaluated under optimized conditions. As shown in Figure 8a, the immobilized enzyme retained over 70% of its relative activity across the temperature range of 60–90 °C, with peak activity (over 90%) between 70 and 90 °C. Compared to the free enzyme which exhibited rapid activity loss above 80 °C, the immobilized form displayed enhanced thermal tolerance. Figure 8b illustrates that TcDAEase also retained high activity under strongly alkaline conditions, with a pH optimum above 10.0. However, from an industrial perspective, extremely high temperatures and pH values pose challenges such as increased energy consumption and the risk of non-enzymatic browning reactions (e.g., Maillard reaction), which can compromise product quality [41]. Therefore, 60 °C and pH 8.0 were selected as the optimal operating conditions, offering a balance between catalytic performance, stability, and process feasibility.
To assess operational stability, reusability tests were conducted under these conditions (60 °C, pH 8.0, 5 mM Mg²⁺). As shown in Figure 9, immobilized TcDAEase retained 90.3% ± 1.5% of its initial activity after seven consecutive cycles—outperforming commonly used agarose- and alginate-based systems, which typically retain only 40–70% activity under similar conditions [54]. This exceptional stability is likely attributed to the synergistic effects of the composite matrix. The glutaraldehyde-crosslinked chitosan network restricts conformational mobility and protects against thermal denaturation, while the porous diatomaceous earth framework provides a large surface area and abundant binding sites, mitigating enzyme leaching and aggregation [55]. Although structural analyses such as SEM or BET were not performed, the physical properties of the composite carrier were consistent with those of food-grade diatomite materials reported in previous literature [48]. Furthermore, the hydrophilic amino and hydroxyl groups of chitosan may create a favorable microenvironment that shields the enzyme from interfacial stresses during packed-bed operation [56].
Together, these results confirm that the chitosan–diatomaceous earth matrix imparts excellent thermal and operational stability to TcDAEase, supporting its application in continuous, food-compatible, and cost-effective D-allulose biomanufacturing.

3.7. Long-Term Continuous D-Allulose Production in Packed-Bed Reactor

As a result of the above findings, 30 g of immobilized TcDAEase was loaded into a packed-bed reactor (Figure 10a) under fixed reaction conditions (60 °C, pH 8.0, 5 mM Mg2+, 500 g/L D-fructose, and a flow rate of 30 mL/min) for long-term production testing. Over 150 consecutive days of operation, the system produced a cumulative total of 756 kg of D-allulose, corresponding to 89.7% of the theoretical maximum (842.2 kg) yield.
Throughout the trial, the reactor exhibited stable hydraulic performance with no detectable pressure buildup or clogging, indicating efficient mass transfer and the mechanical robustness of the immobilized matrix. As shown in Figure 10b, the specific activity of TcDAEase gradually decreased by about 30% (from 6.5 to 4.5 U·g⁻¹), and the substrate conversion rate declined from 26.0 ± 1.2% to 22.5 ± 1.1%. These results confirm the long-term operational stability and excellent performance of the immobilized TcDAEase system for continuous, food-grade D-allulose production.
This system notably outperformed previously reported immobilized enzyme platforms. For instance, Takeshita et al. [22] achieved a 60-day operation using 200 g of immobilized D-tagatose 3-epimerase (70 U·g-1), yielding only 20 kg of D-allulose at pH 7.0. Yoshihara et al. [13] reported continuous production using DAEase from Arthrobacter globiformis immobilized on an ion-exchange resin, which produced 215 kg of D-allulose per liter of catalyst over four months at 55 °C and pH 7.5.
Collectively, these findings underscore the scalability, durability, and industrial viability of the TcDAEase-based biocatalytic system for large-scale, continuous D-allulose manufacturing under food-compatible conditions.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we systematically investigated the catalytic properties and industrial potential of a thermostable D-allulose 3-epimerase (TcDAEase) from Thermogemmatispora carboxidivorans. The enzyme exhibited outstanding thermostability, broad pH tolerance, and high catalytic activity toward D-allulose and D-fructose, even in the absence of metal ion supplementation. Among the tested cofactors, food-grade Mg²⁺ significantly enhanced enzymatic activity, emphasizing the suitability of TcDAEase for food-grade rare sugar production. To improve practical applicability, TcDAEase was immobilized on a chitosan–diatomaceous earth matrix, resulting in favorable activity recovery and excellent operational stability. The immobilized biocatalyst achieved an activity recovery of 48.7% ± 2.4% and retained 90.3% ± 1.5% of its initial activity after seven consecutive cycles. Remarkably, the immobilized enzyme enabled continuous D-allulose production in a packed-bed reactor for 150 days minimal decline (approximately 4%) in conversion efficiency, outperforming several previously reported systems. These results demonstrate that the integration of enzyme thermostability, food-compatible activation, and cost-effective immobilization offers a promising strategy for the scalable and sustainable production of D-allulose.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. Original SDS-PAGE image of TcDAEase (corresponding to Figure 3 in the main text); Figure S2. Appearance of the filtered immobilized TcDAEase particles; Figure S3. Photograph of the packed-bed re-actor system used for continuous D-allulose production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Y. and Y.L.; methodology, J.C.; validation, J.C.; formal analysis, J.C.; investigation, J.C.; resources, M.Y. and Y.L.; data curation, J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.; writing—review and editing, J.C., M.Y. and Y.L.; visualization, J.C.; supervision, M.Y. and Y.L.; project administration, M.Y. and Y.L.; funding acquisition, M.Y. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology, Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, grant number 2022B0202120001. The APC was funded by the same grant.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

This study does not involve any experiments with human participants or animals and therefore did not re-quire ethical approval.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ziade, F.; El-Kassas, G. Exploration of the Risk Factors of Generalized and Central Obesity among Adolescents in North Lebanon. J. Environ. Public Heal. 2017, 2017, 2879075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fletcher, T.; Blumberg, B.; Heindel, J.J.; Porta, M.; Govarts, E.; Legler, J.; Trasande, L. Obesity, Diabetes, and Associated Costs of Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in the European Union. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, 1278–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Puzo, G.; Monsan, P.; Mazarguil, H. [Mechanism of glutaraldehyde-protein bond formation]. Biochimie 1975, 57, 1281–1292. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, J.; Chen, Q.; Guang, C.; Chen, D.; Xu, W.; Wu, H.; Zhang, W.; Mu, W. D-allulose, a versatile rare sugar: recent biotechnological advances and challenges. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 63, 5661–5679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shang, S.; Gao, F.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, T.; Zhao, G.; Lu, X. D-allulose attenuated metaflammation by calming adipose tissue macrophages, boosting intestinal barrier, and modulating gut microbiota in HFD mice. J. Funct. Foods 2024, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yabe, D.; Seino, Y.; Han, W.; Yermek, R.; Wang, L.; Kaneko, K.; Yada, T. D-Allulose cooperates with glucagon-like peptide-1 and activates proopiomelanocortin neurons in the arcuate nucleus and central injection inhibits feeding in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022, 613, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yamada, T.; Tokuda, M.; Takehara, I.; Iida, T.; Okuma, K.; Hayashi, N.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamada, K. Study on the Postprandial Blood Glucose Suppression Effect ofD-Psicose in Borderline Diabetes and the Safety of Long-Term Ingestion by Normal Human Subjects. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2010, 74, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Beglinger, C.; Weltens, N.; Van Oudenhove, L.; Meyer-Gerspach, A.C.; Teysseire, F.; Bordier, V.; Budzinska, A.; Wölnerhanssen, B.K. Metabolic Effects and Safety Aspects of Acute D-allulose and Erythritol Administration in Healthy Subjects. Nutrients 2023, 15, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lu, F.; Guan, L.; Mao, S.; Zhang, Q.; Li, L.; Wang, T.; Wei, M.; Qi, H.; Qin, H.-M. Engineering of Acid-Resistant d-Allulose 3-Epimerase for Functional Juice Production. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 16298–16306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jia, D.; Sun, C.; Peng, C.; Liu, Z.; Li, M.; Wang, H.; Chen, K.; Cheng, X.; Chen, D. Advances on D - psicose and its synthesis. Food and Fermentation Industries 2021, 47, 211–217. [Google Scholar]
  11. Feng, Z.; Guan, L.; Qin, H.-M.; Li, C.; Li, L.; Lu, F. Two-step biosynthesis of d-allulose via a multienzyme cascade for the bioconversion of fruit juices. Food Chem. 2021, 357, 129746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hu, M.; Li, M.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, T.J.C.r.i.f.s.; safety, f. Bioproduction of D-allulose: Properties, applications, purification, and future perspectives. 2021.
  13. Yoshihara, A.; Izumori, K.; Ohtani, K.; Akimitsu, K.; Iida, T.; Matsutani, R.; Kozakai, T.; Gullapalli, P.K.; Shintani, T. Purification and characterization of d-allulose 3-epimerase derived from Arthrobacter globiformis M30, a GRAS microorganism. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2017, 123, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mu, W.; Chu, F.; Zhou, L.L.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, B.; Jia, M. A d-psicose 3-epimerase with neutral pH optimum from Clostridium bolteae for d-psicose production: cloning, expression, purification, and characterization. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 98, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Men, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, X.; Bai, W.; Zhang, L. Overexpression of d-psicose 3-epimerase from Ruminococcus sp. in Escherichia coli and its potential application in d-psicose production. Biotechnol. Lett. 2012, 34, 1901–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Patel, S.N.; Kaushal, G.; Singh, S.P. A Novel d -Allulose 3-Epimerase Gene from the Metagenome of a Thermal Aquatic Habitat and d -Allulose Production by Bacillus subtilis Whole-Cell Catalysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Che Hussian, C.H.A.; Leong, W.Y.J. Thermostable enzyme research advances: a bibliometric analysis. 2023, 21. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 2023, 21, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schwartz, M.; Morgan, B.W.; Deitchman, S.; Devlin, J.J.; Brent, J.; Pomerleau, A.C. Clinical Features, Testing, and Management of Patients with Suspected Prosthetic Hip-Associated Cobalt Toxicity: a Systematic Review of Cases. J. Med Toxicol. 2013, 9, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xia, Y.; Cheng, Q.; Mu, W.; Hu, X.; Sun, Z.; Qiu, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, Z.J.F. Research Advances of d-allulose: An Overview of Physiological Functions, Enzymatic Biotransformation Technologies, and Production Processes. 2021, 10. Food 2021, 10, 2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, S.; Tu, W.; Ji, Y.; Schwaneberg, U.; Ni, Y.; Guo, Y.; Han, R. Novel multienzyme cascade for efficient synthesis of d-allulose from inexpensive sucrose. Food Biosci. 2023, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, F.; Fan, D.; Han, S. Designable immobilization of D-allulose 3-epimerase on bimetallic organic frameworks based on metal ion compatibility for enhanced D-allulose production. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 273, 133027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Izumori, K.; Takada, G.; Takeshita, K.; Suga, A. Mass Production of D-Psicose from D-Fructose by a Continuous Bioreactor System Using Immobilized D-Tagatose 3-Epimerase. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2000, 90, 453–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Izumori, K.; Okaya, H.; Tsumura, T.; Khan, A.R. A New Enzyme,D-Ketohexose 3-Epimerase, fromPseudomonassp. ST-24. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1993, 57, 1037–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Izumori, K.; Ishida, Y.; Kimura, Y.; Itoh, H.; Kamiya, T. Cloning and characterization of the d-tagatose 3-epimerase gene from Pseudomonas cichorii ST-24. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1997, 83, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lee, Y.-J.; Hyun, E.-K.; Oh, D.-K.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, Y.-S. Characterization of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens d -Psicose 3-Epimerase That Converts d -Fructose to d -Psicose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 981–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, N.-H.; Jung, M.H.; Park, C.-S.; Kim, S.W.; Park, B.W.; Kim, H.-J.; Oh, D.-K.; Ko, M.; Yoon, K.-H. d-Psicose production from d-fructose using an isolated strain, Sinorhizobium sp. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 23, 559–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mu, W.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, L. Characterization of d-tagatose-3-epimerase from Rhodobacter sphaeroides that converts d-fructose into d-psicose. Biotechnol. Lett. 2009, 31, 857–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xing, Q.; Zhou, L.; Yu, S.; Chu, F.; Mu, W.; Jiang, B. Correction to Cloning, Expression, and Characterization of a d-Psicose 3-Epimerase from Clostridium cellulolyticum H10. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 10408–10408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fang, D.; Zhou, L.; Mu, W.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, T. Characterization of a d-psicose-producing enzyme, d-psicose 3-epimerase, from Clostridium sp. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013, 35, 1481–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fang, D.; Xing, Q.; Zhou, L.; Mu, W.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, B. Characterization of a Novel Metal-Dependent D-Psicose 3-Epimerase from Clostridium scindens 35704. PLOS ONE 2013, 8, e62987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fang, D.; Zhou, L.; Mu, W.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, T. Characterization of a Metal-Dependent d-Psicose 3-Epimerase from a Novel Strain, Desmospora sp. 8437. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 11468–11476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, L.; Mu, W.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, B.; Li, H.; Zhang, T. Characterization of a d-psicose 3-epimerase from Dorea sp. CAG317 with an acidic pH optimum and a high specific activity. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2015, 120, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mu, W.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, T. Biochemical characterization of a d-psicose 3-epimerase from Treponema primitiaZAS-1 and its application on enzymatic production of d-psicose. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 96, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, T.; Shin, K.-C.; Park, C.-S.; Kim, K.-R.; Hong, S.-H.; Oh, D.-K. D-Allulose Production from D-Fructose by Permeabilized Recombinant Cells of Corynebacterium glutamicum Cells Expressing D-Allulose 3-Epimerase Flavonifractor plautii. PLOS ONE 2016, 11, e0160044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fang, T.-Y.; Hsu, C.-T.; Wang, M.-J.; Chen, C.-N.; Lee, H.-C.; Fang, H.-Y.; Wu, Y.-H.; Tseng, W.-C. Characterization of a recombinant d-allulose 3-epimerase from Agrobacterium sp. ATCC 31749 and identification of an important interfacial residue. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 112, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Men, Y.; Ren, C.; Zhu, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Sun, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, T.; Tian, C.; Yang, J. Development of food-grade expression system for d-allulose 3-epimerase preparation with tandem isoenzyme genes in Corynebacterium glutamicum and its application in conversion of cane molasses to D-allulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2018, 116, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, Z.; Guang, C.; Mu, W.; Zhang, W.; Li, S. Characterization of a d-tagatose 3-epimerase from Caballeronia fortuita and its application in rare sugar production. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 138, 536–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Agustriana, E.; Nuryana, I.; Nirwantono, R.; Laksmi, F.A. Expression and characterization of thermostable D-allulose 3-epimerase from Arthrobacter psychrolactophilus (Ap DAEase) with potential catalytic activity for bioconversion of D-allulose from d-fructose. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 214, 426–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. An, Y.; Tang, X.; Cong, H.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Ravikumar, Y.; Zhao, M.; Zhou, H.; Qi, X.; Iqbal, M.W.; et al. The Characterization of a Novel D-allulose 3-Epimerase from Blautia produca and Its Application in D-allulose Production. Foods 2022, 11, 3225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Žídek, A.; Potapenko, A.; et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hamid; Thakur, A.; Gautam, S.; Kathuria, D. Maillard reaction in different food products: Effect on product quality, human health and mitigation strategies. Food Control. 2023, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kulminskaya, A.A.; Ivanova, N.S.; Shvetsova, S.V. Structural and Functional Features of Ketose-3-Epimerases and Their Use for D-Allulose Production. Russ. J. Bioorganic Chem. 2023, 49, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fan, L.-H.; Zheng, L.-J.; Luo, X.; Liu, C.-Y.; Gao, X.-Q.; Zheng, H.-D.; Guo, Q.; Deng, L. Engineering Escherichia coli for d-Allulose Production from d-Fructose by Fermentation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 13578–13585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dong, Z.-X.; Zheng, L.-J.; Luo, X.; Guo, Q.; Zheng, H.-D.; Fan, L.-H. Engineering Escherichia coli for D-allulose biosynthesis from glycerol. J. Biotechnol. 2024, 394, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lu, F.; Qin, H.-M.; Wei, C.; Li, C.; Gao, X.; Qi, H. Directional immobilization of D-allulose 3-epimerase using SpyTag/SpyCatcher strategy as a robust biocatalyst for synthesizing D-allulose. Food Chem. 2022, 401, 134199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bejar, S.; Plou, F.J.; Bouanane-Darenfed, A.; Ballesteros, A.O.; Neifar, S.; BenHlima, H.; Cervantes, F.V. Immobilization of the glucose isomerase from Caldicoprobacter algeriensis on Sepabeads EC-HA and its efficient application in continuous High Fructose Syrup production using packed bed reactor. Food Chem. 2020, 309, 125710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ang, L.F.; Por, L.Y.; Yam, M.F. Study on Different Molecular Weights of Chitosan as an Immobilization Matrix for a Glucose Biosensor. PLOS ONE 2013, 8, e70597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Shen, J.; Salmon, S.; Yuan, Y. Developing Enzyme Immobilization with Fibrous Membranes: Longevity and Characterization Considerations. Membranes 2023, 13, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lu, J.; Wang, W.; Wolynes, P.G.; Li, W.; Chen, M.; Zhang, Y. Frustration and the Kinetic Repartitioning Mechanism of Substrate Inhibition in Enzyme Catalysis. J. Phys. Chem. B 2022, 126, 6792–6801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Elorza, B.; Arias, C.; Aranaz, I.; Alcántara, A.R.; Acosta, N.; Caballero, A.H.; Civera, M.C. Chitosan: An Overview of Its Properties and Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Schatz, C.; Christensen, B.E.; Bourasseau, S.; Courtecuisse, E. Synthesis of linear chitosan-block-dextran copolysaccharides with dihydrazide and dioxyamine linkers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 345, 122576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. da S Pereira, A.; Souza, C.P.L.; Moraes, L.B.D.d.; Fontes-Sant’Ana, G.C.; Amaral, P.F.F.J.P. Polymers as Encapsulating Agents and Delivery Vehicles of Enzymes. Polymers 2021, 13, 4061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ayers, M.R.; Hunt, A.J.J. Synthesis and properties of chitosan–silica hybrid aerogels. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 2001, 285, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yang, J.; Zheng, S.; Zhao, F.; Han, S.; Lin, Y.; Fan, D. Characterization of D-Allulose-3-Epimerase From Ruminiclostridium papyrosolvens and Immobilization Within Metal-Organic Frameworks. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 869536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sha, C.; Shao, W.; Sadaqat, B.; Dhanavade, M.J.; Sonawane, K.D.; Mohamed, H.; Song, Y.; Dar, M.A. Modifying Thermostability and Reusability of Hyperthermophilic Mannanase by Immobilization on Glutaraldehyde Cross-Linked Chitosan Beads. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gorla, R.; Murthy, P.; Beg, O.A.; Ray, A.K.; B, V. Magneto-bioconvection flow of a casson thin film with nanoparticles over an unsteady stretching sheet. Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 2019, 29, 4277–4309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree showing evolutionary relationships between TcDAEase and other reported D-allulose and D-tagatose epimerases. The amino acid sequence sources were as follows: Thermogemmatispora carboxidivorans (WP_052889376.1); Agrobacterium fabrum (AAK88700.1); Enterocloster bolteae (EDP19602.1); Ruminiclostridium cellulolyticum H10 (ACL75304.1); Treponema primitia (ZP_09717154.1); Desmospora sp. (WP_009711885.1); Clostridium sp. (WP_014314767.1); Clostridium scindens (WP_004607502.1); Ruminococcus sp. (ZP_04858451.1); Cereibacter sphaeroides (ACO59490.1); Pseudomonas cichorii (BAA24429.1); Agrobacterium sp. (EGL65884.1); Flavonifractor plautii (WP_007494289.1); Paenibacillus senegalensis (WP_010270828.1); Caballeronia fortuita (WP_061137998.1); Sinorhizobium sp. (WP_069063284.1); Agrobacterium tumefaciens (ANH56792.1); Dorea sp.( WP_022318236.1) DaeM (WP_010270828.1); and Blautia produca (WP_294524766.1).
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree showing evolutionary relationships between TcDAEase and other reported D-allulose and D-tagatose epimerases. The amino acid sequence sources were as follows: Thermogemmatispora carboxidivorans (WP_052889376.1); Agrobacterium fabrum (AAK88700.1); Enterocloster bolteae (EDP19602.1); Ruminiclostridium cellulolyticum H10 (ACL75304.1); Treponema primitia (ZP_09717154.1); Desmospora sp. (WP_009711885.1); Clostridium sp. (WP_014314767.1); Clostridium scindens (WP_004607502.1); Ruminococcus sp. (ZP_04858451.1); Cereibacter sphaeroides (ACO59490.1); Pseudomonas cichorii (BAA24429.1); Agrobacterium sp. (EGL65884.1); Flavonifractor plautii (WP_007494289.1); Paenibacillus senegalensis (WP_010270828.1); Caballeronia fortuita (WP_061137998.1); Sinorhizobium sp. (WP_069063284.1); Agrobacterium tumefaciens (ANH56792.1); Dorea sp.( WP_022318236.1) DaeM (WP_010270828.1); and Blautia produca (WP_294524766.1).
Preprints 162141 g001
Figure 2. Multiple sequence alignment of D-allulose 3-epimerases showing conserved residues involved in metal coordination (■) and substrate binding (●). Strictly conserved amino acids are shown in red boxes. Alignment visualization was performed using ESPript 3.0.
Figure 2. Multiple sequence alignment of D-allulose 3-epimerases showing conserved residues involved in metal coordination (■) and substrate binding (●). Strictly conserved amino acids are shown in red boxes. Alignment visualization was performed using ESPript 3.0.
Preprints 162141 g002
Figure 3. SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant TcDAEase expression and purification. Lane M: Protein molecular weight marker (14.3-66.4 kDa); Lane 1: E. coli BL21 (DE3) (empty pET-22b vector); Lane 2: E. coli BL21 (DE3) expressing TcDAEase; Lane 3: crude cell extract; Lane 4: purified TcDAEase.
Figure 3. SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant TcDAEase expression and purification. Lane M: Protein molecular weight marker (14.3-66.4 kDa); Lane 1: E. coli BL21 (DE3) (empty pET-22b vector); Lane 2: E. coli BL21 (DE3) expressing TcDAEase; Lane 3: crude cell extract; Lane 4: purified TcDAEase.
Preprints 162141 g003
Figure 4. Effect of temperature, pH, and metal ions on TcDAEase activity. The investigation of optimal temperature (a) and thermal stability (b) employed a buffer solution of 50 mM NaH2PO4-Na2HPO4 (pH 8.0) supplemented with 1 mM Mg2+; the effect of pH was conducted using various buffers: Na2HPO4-citrate buffer (pH 4.0-5.0), Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 buffer (pH 6.0-8.0), glycine-NaOH buffer (pH 9.0-10.0), Na2CO3-NaHCO3 buffer (pH 11.0), and KCl-NaOH buffer (pH 12.0-13.0), targeting optimal pH (c) and pH stability (d); the impact of various metal ions was evaluated at 60 °C and pH 8.0, examining the optimal activating ions (e) and the influence of Mg2+ concentration on activity (f).
Figure 4. Effect of temperature, pH, and metal ions on TcDAEase activity. The investigation of optimal temperature (a) and thermal stability (b) employed a buffer solution of 50 mM NaH2PO4-Na2HPO4 (pH 8.0) supplemented with 1 mM Mg2+; the effect of pH was conducted using various buffers: Na2HPO4-citrate buffer (pH 4.0-5.0), Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 buffer (pH 6.0-8.0), glycine-NaOH buffer (pH 9.0-10.0), Na2CO3-NaHCO3 buffer (pH 11.0), and KCl-NaOH buffer (pH 12.0-13.0), targeting optimal pH (c) and pH stability (d); the impact of various metal ions was evaluated at 60 °C and pH 8.0, examining the optimal activating ions (e) and the influence of Mg2+ concentration on activity (f).
Preprints 162141 g004
Figure 5. (a) Relative activity of TcDAEase toward different D-ketohexoses, with D-allulose set as 100%; (b) Michaelis–Menten kinetic curve of TcDAEase for D-fructose.
Figure 5. (a) Relative activity of TcDAEase toward different D-ketohexoses, with D-allulose set as 100%; (b) Michaelis–Menten kinetic curve of TcDAEase for D-fructose.
Preprints 162141 g005
Figure 6. Optimization of TcDAEase immobilization parameters. (a) Effect of wet cell loading (0.5-2.5 g/100 mL) on protein loading and activity recovery; (b) Immobilized enzyme activity at different precipitation pH values: 5.0–6.0 (adjusted with 1 M NaOH and 1.4 M Na₂SO₄), 6.5–7.0 (adjusted by gradual addition of 1 M NaOH), and 10.0–11.0 (adjusted by excess addition of 1 M NaOH). (c) Initial catalytic activity versus chitosan concentration (2.5-10 g/L); (d) Operational stability during seven batch cycles for 5 g/L (■), 10 g/L (●), 20 g/L (▲), 30 g/L (▼), and 40 g/L (♦) chitosan concentrations.
Figure 6. Optimization of TcDAEase immobilization parameters. (a) Effect of wet cell loading (0.5-2.5 g/100 mL) on protein loading and activity recovery; (b) Immobilized enzyme activity at different precipitation pH values: 5.0–6.0 (adjusted with 1 M NaOH and 1.4 M Na₂SO₄), 6.5–7.0 (adjusted by gradual addition of 1 M NaOH), and 10.0–11.0 (adjusted by excess addition of 1 M NaOH). (c) Initial catalytic activity versus chitosan concentration (2.5-10 g/L); (d) Operational stability during seven batch cycles for 5 g/L (■), 10 g/L (●), 20 g/L (▲), 30 g/L (▼), and 40 g/L (♦) chitosan concentrations.
Preprints 162141 g006
Figure 7. Schematic illustration of the three-step adsorption–crosslinking–embedding process for immobilizing TcDAEase onto a chitosan–diatomaceous earth composite.
Figure 7. Schematic illustration of the three-step adsorption–crosslinking–embedding process for immobilizing TcDAEase onto a chitosan–diatomaceous earth composite.
Preprints 162141 g007
Figure 8. Biochemical characterization of immobilized TcDAEase. (a) Temperature-activity profile measured in 50 mM Na₂HPO₄-NaH₂PO₄ buffer (pH 8.0) containing 1 mM Mg2+. (b) pH-activity profile assessed at 60 °C using various buffer systems (Na₂HPO₄-citrate buffer (pH 4.0-5.0), Na₂HPO₄- NaH₂PO₄ buffer (pH 6.0-8.0), glycine-NaOH buffer (pH 9.0-10.0)).
Figure 8. Biochemical characterization of immobilized TcDAEase. (a) Temperature-activity profile measured in 50 mM Na₂HPO₄-NaH₂PO₄ buffer (pH 8.0) containing 1 mM Mg2+. (b) pH-activity profile assessed at 60 °C using various buffer systems (Na₂HPO₄-citrate buffer (pH 4.0-5.0), Na₂HPO₄- NaH₂PO₄ buffer (pH 6.0-8.0), glycine-NaOH buffer (pH 9.0-10.0)).
Preprints 162141 g008
Figure 9. Reusability of immobilized TcDAEase: The reaction occurred by introducing 1 g of immobilized TcDAEase into a 20 mL fructose solution comprising 50 g/L D-fructose, 1 mM Mg2+, maintained at 60 °C and pH 8.0. Following each reaction, the immobilized TcDAEase was washed with deionized water and transferred into fresh fructose solution for successive reaction batches. After each batch, residual catalytic activity (■) and substrate conversion (▲) were analyzed.
Figure 9. Reusability of immobilized TcDAEase: The reaction occurred by introducing 1 g of immobilized TcDAEase into a 20 mL fructose solution comprising 50 g/L D-fructose, 1 mM Mg2+, maintained at 60 °C and pH 8.0. Following each reaction, the immobilized TcDAEase was washed with deionized water and transferred into fresh fructose solution for successive reaction batches. After each batch, residual catalytic activity (■) and substrate conversion (▲) were analyzed.
Preprints 162141 g009
Figure 10. Continuous bioconversion of D-fructose to D-allulose by immobilized TcDAEase in a packed-bed reactor. (a) Schematic of the reactor system (30 g immobilized enzyme, 60 °C jacket temperature). (b) Operational stability over 150 days: Residual activity (▲) and conversion rate (■) were monitored under continuous conditions (30 mL/min, 500 g/L D-fructose, pH 8.0, 5 mM Mg2+).
Figure 10. Continuous bioconversion of D-fructose to D-allulose by immobilized TcDAEase in a packed-bed reactor. (a) Schematic of the reactor system (30 g immobilized enzyme, 60 °C jacket temperature). (b) Operational stability over 150 days: Residual activity (▲) and conversion rate (■) were monitored under continuous conditions (30 mL/min, 500 g/L D-fructose, pH 8.0, 5 mM Mg2+).
Preprints 162141 g010
Table 1. Comparison of biochemical properties of reported DAEases and DTEases.
Table 1. Comparison of biochemical properties of reported DAEases and DTEases.
Strain of enzyme source Optimal temperature
(°C)
Optimal pH Metal ion Half-life Catalytic activity
(U/mg)
Reference
Pseudomonas sp. 60 7.0-9.0 NR NR NR [23]
Pseudomonas cichorii 60 7.5 NR NR NR [24]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens 50 8.0 Mn2+ 63.5 min/50 °C 8.89 [25]
Sinorhizobium sp. 40 8.5 Mn2++ 11050 min/35 °C,
934 min/40 °C,
251 min/45 °C,
1151 min/50 °C
NR [26]
Rhodobacter sphaeroides 40 9.0 Mn2+ NR NR [27]
Clostridium cellulolyticum 55 8.0 Co2+ 408 min/60 °C NR [28]
Ruminococcus sp. 60 7.5-8.0 Mn2+ 96 min/60 °C 8.95 [15]
Clostridium sp. 65 8.0 Co2+ 15 min/60 °C NR [29]
Clostridium scindens 60 7.5 Mn2+ 108 min/50 °C NR [30]
Desmospora sp. 60 7.5 Co2+ NR NR [31]
Clostridium bolteae 55 7.0 Co2+ 156 min/55 °C NR [14]
Dorea sp. 70 6.0 Co2+ NR 803 [32]
Treponema primitia 70 8.0 Co2+ 30 min/60 °C NR [33]
Flavonifractor plautii 65 7.0 Co2+ 40 min/65 °C 20 [34]
Arthrobacter globiformis 70 7.0-8.0 Mg2+ NR 23.6 [13]
Agrobacterium sp. 55-60 7.5-8.0 Co2+ 267 min/55 °C,
28.2 min/60 °C,,
3.8 min/65 °C
90.5 [35]
Corynebacterium glutamicum 55 8.0 Mn2+ 140 min/60 °C 22.7 [36]
DaeM 80 7.0 Co2+ 9900 min/60 °C,
3240 min/70 °C,
49 min/80 °C
1.14 ± 0.048 [16]
Caballeronia fortuita 65 7.5 Co2+ 427.8 min/50 °C,
307.8 min/55 °C,
63 min/60 °C
270 ± 1.5 [37]
Arthrobacter psychrolactophilus 70 8.5 Mg2+ 128.4 min/70 °C 14.3 [38]
Blautia produca 55 8.0 Mn2+ 180 min/55 °C 1.76 ± 0.099 [39]
Thermogemmatispora carboxidivorans 80 10.0 Ni2+ 720 min/60 °C,
300 min/70 °C,
40 min/80 °C
7.9 ± 0.3 This work
* NR, not reported.
Table 2. Comparison of the kinetic parameters of reported DAEases and DPEases.
Table 2. Comparison of the kinetic parameters of reported DAEases and DPEases.
Enzyme source (strain) kcat (s⁻¹) Km (mM) kcat/Km (s⁻¹·mM⁻¹) Reference
Agrobacterium tumefaciens 34.46 ± 0.46 24 ± 0.15 1.41 ± 0.02 [25]
Clostridium cellulolyticum 55.91 ± 0.787 53.5 ± 1.8 1.045 ± 0.025 [28]
Ruminococcus sp. 59.4 ± 0.483 216 ± 2 0.267 ± 0.017 [15]
Clostridium sp. 272.87 ± 1.37 279 ± 10.8 0.978 ± 0.065 [29]
Clostridium scindens 5.83 ± 0.43 40.1 ± 2.5 0.145 ± 0.02 [30]
Clostridium bolteae 59 ± 1 59.8 ± 8.2 0.99 ± 0.05 [14]
Dorea sp. 5507.45 153 3.31 [32]
Treponema primitia 292.88 ± 6.48 279 ± 20.7 1.05 ± 0.097 [33]
Flavonifractor plautii 225280 162 156 [34]
Arthrobacter globiformis 41.8 37.5 1.12 [13]
Agrobacterium sp. 106.7 110 1.06 [35]
Corynebacterium glutamicum 40.92 ± 0.175 366.7 ± 10.5 0.11 ± 0.077 [36]
Bacillus subtilis 41.99 ± 2.3 141.43 ± 7.5 0.29 ± 0.09 [16]
Caballeronia fortuita 157.21 ± 0.53 81.9 ± 4.3 1.30 ± 0.12 [37]
Arthrobacter psychrolactophilus 2920 738.7 3.953 [38]
Blautia produca 65.03 ± 3.56 235.7 ± 9.938 0.28 ± 0.014 [39]
Thermogemmatispora carboxidivorans 96.6 ± 0.5 260.9 ±7.4 0.38 ± 0.02 This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated