4.1. Forming of a Toroidal Shell of Circular Section
For the analysis of the production of a toroidal shell of circular section, tubes with initial heights
of 7 and 9 mm were employed in the tool presented in
Figure 1. The numerical analysis of those preforms allowed us to conclude which are the conditions for the existence of a free rotation of the toroidal shell over the disk.
The plastic deformation of the tubular preforms during forming results from the mechanisms of flaring and friction. The first takes place when the tube starts to be axially compressed being forced to flare along the tool radius, whereas the influence of friction becomes noticeable until the toroidal shell is completely formed. As will be seen, the surface of the forming tools in contact with the silver tubes and disk needs to provide lower levels of friction to avoid aesthetic defects and/or material flow defects.
Two different situations are presented in
Figure 5, starting with an initial tube height
of 7 mm (
Figure 5a) and 9 mm (
Figure 5b) without a gap between the tube and mandrel. As can be observed by the distributions of effective stress in the initial and final stages of deformation, both the upper and lower sections of the circular toroidal shell are subjected to high levels of stress which may create defects in the torus surface as well as premature tool wear. With regards to the cross-section, the utilization of a larger tube height (
Figure 5b) gives rise to the creation of a toroidal shell that is not completely circular but instead has a straight vertical inner wall that may produce an undesirable mechanical interlocking that will constrain the rotation movement of the shell as intended.
Utilizing a gap between the tubular preform and mandrel plays an important role in the operation's success. In fact, when no gap exists between the tubular preform and mandrel as shown in
Figure 6a, it allows to produce a fully circular toroidal shell with reduced stress levels, due to reduced friction between the tube and dies, since the beginning of the forming operation is mostly localized at the radius of the flaring dies. This gap needs however to be controlled to avoid the risk of the occurrence of plastic instability, since when a gap of 0.75 mm was created between the tubular preform and mandrel as shown in
Figure 6b, the contact between the tube and flaring dies was initiated near the end of the flaring radius.
A symmetrical deformation between the upper and lower region of the torus free from defects can then be produced, as seen from the isolated tube forming operation (without the disk) of
Figure 6a. The dimension of the internal diameter
of the toroidal shell which is necessary to machine the hole in the disk in which the tubular preform will be positioned, as well as the value of the other process variables are summarized in
Table 2.
The photographs of the experimental tests obtained under the conditions of
Figure 6a are presented in
Figure 7 where a toroidal shell of circular section is formed in a raw disk. The tube is firstly positioned in the disk hole (
Figure 7a), then the upper die which contains a flaring radius
of 1 mm is positioned at the top of the tube (
Figure 7b) and will produce an axial compression that is responsible for forming the toroidal shell.
After the process is finished, the dies are removed and the disk with the rotating element is completed (
Figure 7c). If the disk is already engraved, the coin is produced in a single stroke.
Under these conditions, a free rotation exists between the toroidal shell and disk with a reduced gap between the two elements, thus increasing the perceived quality of the final product. At the same time, in functional terms, this reduced gap leads to a soft rotation movement and avoids the penetration of debris that may block the rotation of the assembly. In energetic terms, the necessary force to produce the coin with a rotating element is limited to the forming force of the toroidal shell since only the deformation of the tube is verified. The elastic recovery of the tube material is reduced and does not seem to have a significant influence on the rotation movement. The same is verified with the anisotropy of the tube material and the resulting differences in the cylindricity of the toroidal shell.
4.2. Forming of a Toroidal Shell of Non-Circular Section
While the production of a toroidal shell of circular section demands a considerable volume that will brace the circular disk, the production of a non-circular toroidal shell allows to obtain a bigger engraving area and it utilizes a chamfered disk hole as a rotation pivot. This toroidal shell presented in
Figure 8 also reduces the overall thickness of the assembly, but it still allows the utilization of disks of larger thickness without protrusions above its surfaces by producing a straight inner torus wall. The free rotation is guaranteed in this case by a discontinuous and localized contact that offers higher levels of rotation than the previous technique.
The different set of tools (refer to
Figure 8) consists of an upper and lower punch with a given flaring radius, that will perform the forming operation of the non-circular torus up to a displacement where it will be very close to the chamfered hole of the disk. To ensure inner straight walls, the tool setup also includes a removable internal mandrel and in contrast with what was observed for toroidal shells of circular sections, no gaps are now necessary between the tubular preform and mandrel. A relief angle should however be introduced in the mandrel to allow the extraction of the coin without damaging the toroidal shell. A small radius of 0.05 mm should also be included in the boundary regions of the punches to create a support region for the engraved disk to be correctly positioned, thus avoiding rotation defects and/or damage to its surfaces
The tool for controlling the gap (
Figure 8b) is composed of two punches with the same radius that were utilized for the first stage where the torus was formed (refer to
Figure 8a). The operation consists in the axial compression of the toroidal shell with those punches to force the material of the torus to flow in the opposite direction of the disk, thus creating the desired gap between the surfaces if not admissible due to possible material variations.
For the determination of the optimal flaring radius that allows to obtain the C-shaped section, tubes with smaller initial heights
of 4 and 6 mm were selected and disks with a chamfered hole were prepared. An initial height
of 4 mm has shown to be the critical height above which plastic instability of the tube wall is verified for the tooling system employed. For this height of 4 mm only a local thickening of the tube wall is observed, and the values of the remaining working variables before the calibration of the gap with the tool of
Figure 8b are summarized in
Table 3.
Regarding the flaring radius
, a flaring radius of 1 mm was previously utilized to produce a toroidal shell of circular section. From the numerical simulations, it was seen that a very small radius of 0.5 mm is not able to produce a toroidal shell of non-circular section without defects and constraints material flow during the forming operation. By its turn, a radius of 0.75 mm (in between 0.5 and 1 mm) presents itself as the best compromise as seen by the evolution of
Figure 9, where it can be observed that the forming of the toroidal shell occurs until a displacement where it is almost in contact with the chamfer of the disk. At this point, the process is terminated to guarantee a free rotation movement between those elements and if needed, a secondary operation can be performed with the tool of
Figure 8b to calibrate the gap between the torus and disk, to ensure the desired levels of rotation.
In comparison with a toroidal shell of circular section, this variant demands lower forming force due to the reduced tube height and consequently a reduced tool displacement becomes necessary to produce the disk with the rotating element.
Both techniques are characterized by a load-displacement curve where the load increases gradually with the axial compression of the tube and the main deformation mechanisms that govern the material flow behaviour start to be triggered. Those mechanisms are the bending as the tube initiates the contact with the dies and stretching along the circumferential direction as the tube is forced to deform against the surface contour of the dies. The contact is not uniform along those interfaces but rather limited to specific regions where high values of contact pressure are found and where reduced friction conditions can positively influence the overall forming process.
By analysing the force-displacement evolution of
Figure 9 for the production of a toroidal shell of non-circular section, as that to be utilized in the industrial coin production, it can be seen that the load starts to increase from point I to point II, due to a more pronounced bending effect of the tube as it adapts to the contour of the dies. Then, the overall forming load grows moderately and then rapidly until point III, where the upper and lower dies are in full contact with the surfaces of the fully formed toroidal shell, which by its turn makes contact with the disk. From this point, the tool setup is changed and the calibration of the gap between the toroidal shell and disk is performed according to the evolution at point IV. The inserts of
Figure 9 allow us to identify the corresponding stage of each point identified in the graph.
Photographs of the set of tools for the fabrication of the non-circular toroidal shell are presented in
Figure 10. The conditions of the deformation can be controlled by the tolerances and surface finish of the tools.
After the toroidal shell is formed at the disk hole with the tool from
Figure 10a, the tool from
Figure 10b can then be utilized to increase the gap between the two parts and produce the desired levels of rotation.
The punches to perform the coining of the disk are presented in
Figure 11, where the dimensions of the centre hole at the disk are controlled by a mandrel that is integrated into one of the punches during coin minting.
The original tube with the engraved disk and the final coin after forming of the toroidal shell are presented in
Figure 12a and 12b, respectively.