Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Production and Quality of Meat from Lambs Fed Fresh Sulla Forage (Sulla coronaria (L.) Medik)

Submitted:

27 May 2025

Posted:

28 May 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of fresh sulla forage (FSF) in the diet on intake, growth, carcass traits, and meat quality of lambs. Twenty-four male lambs of Comisana breed (age 80±8 days; live weight 17.8±3.2 kg) were assigned to 2 groups receiving, until slaughter (age 128±8 days), FSF (crude protein (CP) 174 g/kg dry matter (DM), condensed tannins (CT) 15.6 g/kg DM) or alfalfa hay pellets (AHP, CP 181 g/kg DM), and a faba beans and barley mixture offered ad libitum. The greater forage intake of FSF lambs (451 vs 306 g DM/day; p<0.0001) corresponded to a lower incidence of concentrate in the diet (51.3 vs 64.2 % DM; p<0.0001) and in a not significant increase in final live weight (27.3 vs 26.0 kg), leading to an equal feed conversion ratio (4.90) between diets. The FSF diet tended to limit perirenal and pelvic fat (1.62 vs 2.04 %; p=0.0673) and reduce the incidence of adipose tissue in the hind leg (7.65 vs 9.13 %; p=0.0120). The meat from FSF lambs showed a more intense yellow colour (7.90 vs 6.38; p=0.0273) and a lower intramuscular fat content (47.0 vs 61.0 g/kg; p=0.0186). The diet influenced meat fatty acid (FA) profile, confirming the effect of CT from FSF in limiting the ruminal biohydrogenation of ingested unsaturated FA. Indeed, the FSF diet increased the beneficial rumenic acid (1.58 vs 1.02 % FA; p=0.0197) and trans-vaccenic acid (1.95 vs 0.69 % FA; p<0.0001). In triangle tests, no sensory difference related to diets was perceived in meat. The results highlight the effects of FSF in reducing carcass and meat fatness and improving the intramuscular FA profile.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

In recent years, consumers have become increasingly health-conscious and are looking for food products that not only meet their hedonistic expectations related to taste but are also nutritionally balanced. It is well-established that various aspects of meat and milk quality, including colour, flavor, and fatty acid (FA) composition greatly depend on livestock animals diet [1,2,3]. Several scientific studies showed that lambs fed fresh forage provide meat with superior nutritional properties than lambs confined indoors and fed dry diets based on stored forages and concentrates [2,4,5,6]. In addition, livestock farming systems based mainly on grazing are shown, in most cases, to be economically more competitive than grain-based systems. Nevertheless, in grazing farming systems, the high protein to carbohydrate ratio of pasture forages in early phenological phases can limit microbial protein synthesis in the rumen, with consequent nitrogen losses [7]. Moreover, an intensive protein degradation in the rumen leads to the formation of volatile indolic compounds derived from tryptophan, particularly skatole (3-methylindole) that, accumulated in fat tissues, became responsible of an intense and undesirable “pastoral” flavor in meat, highly perceived by consumers [8,9,10,11].
Improvements in sensory quality of lamb meat exploiting fresh forage at pasture could be achieved with appropriate feeding strategies, able to ensure the production of meat with appreciable organoleptic traits and health properties. In this regard, tanniferous legume species have acquired interest in ruminants feeding and nutrition, due to their ability to improve sustainability, animal health and quality of dairy products and meat [11,12,13,14,15]. This growing interest in forage legumes is linked to their moderate content (<6% dry matter (DM)) in condensed tannins (CT), phenolic compounds also called proanthocyanidins, known for their beneficial properties. Among these latter, CT show the ability to reduce the degradation of dietary proteins, to which they bind, limit the methanogenesis in the rumen, thus improving the efficiency of diet utilization and decreasing nitrogen and methane emissions in the environment [14,16,17,18], and control the gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in sheep, associated to the reduction of nematode and fecal excretion of their eggs [13,19]. Moreover, tannins showed to reduce skatole concentration in the fat of lambs and attenuate the sheep meat odour, as observed by Priolo et al. (2009) [8] using quebracho tannins as dietary supplement. As other polyphenolic compounds, also CT represent natural molecules with antioxidant activity, being able to improve the health status of animals and the oxidative stability of their products [20]. The antioxidant protection of CT showed to be able to preserve meat from oxidation of lipid and myoglobin, this latter directly involved in meat colour stability during storage [21]. Furthermore, CT intervene in modulating rumen biohydrogenation of dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) that, transferred in the animal tissues, contribute to improving the nutritional and health properties of the derived products [14,15,22,23,24]. In this regard, it is well recognized that PUFA intake in the human diet helps to reduce cardiovascular diseases and, among PUFA, rumenic acid (RA, C18:2 c9t11), the main isomer of conjugated linoleic acids (CLA), plays a protective role against carcinogenesis [25,26].
Among the tanniferous legume species, sulla (Sulla coronaria (L.) Medik) is the most largely widespread in semi-arid environments of Mediterranean basin, where it is grown as a 2-year forage crop to be exploited for grazing and hay production [27]. Sulla phytochemicals include terpenes and, among phenolic compounds, flavonoids and especially CT, this latter present mainly in leaves and flowers [28]. In several investigations involving small ruminants, fresh sulla forage (FSF) was proven to be highly palatable, and positively affect dairy production, especially increasing milk yield and casein content [29,30,31,32], and enhancing FA profile of dairy products [33,34]. Moreover, a role of CT intake from FSF in improving the plasma oxidative status was found in dairy goats [35,36] and ewes [32].
Although the general effects of pasture feeding on meat production and quality are well-known, there are relatively few specific studies examining the impact of FSF on lamb meat quality. In lambs fed FSF, Burke et al., (2004) [37] observed a higher growth rate and a reduced rumen proteolysis than in those fed other fresh forage resources. When comparing diets based on FSF or annual rygrass, also Bonanno et al. (2011) [2] reported favourable effects of feeding FSF on lambs growth and carcass yield, attributed to greater intake and better efficiency of dietary protein utilization, whereas no effect emerged on physical, chemical and sensory traits of meat.
Priolo et al. (2005) [38] found similar growth performance between lambs fed with only FSF or oats hay and concentrate, whereas observed an improved FA profile in meat from FSF-fed lambs, which resulted lower in saturated fatty acids (SFA) and higher in α-linolenic acid (ALA, C18:3 n-3) and RA. Apart this last finding, the effects of FSF on FA profile of lamb meat still remains limitedly investigated, and need further insights by comparisons with other dry forage resources.
This study aimed to assess the impact of FSF containing CT in the diet of lambs from 80 to 128 days of age, evaluating their feed intake, growth rate, carcass traits and meat quality, with particular regard to its FA profile, in comparison with lambs fed a diet based on CT-free alfalfa hay pellets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Lambs and Experimental Diets

This research was conducted in winter (January-February) in a farm located in the province of Agrigento (Sicily, Italy).
At weaning, 24 male lambs of Comisana breed aged 65±8 days (mean±sd), with an average body weight of 16.8±3.1 kg (mean±sd), were assigned to 2 homogeneous groups according to age and body weight; then each group was divided into 2 subgroups of 6 lambs, and each subgroup was housed in a wheat straw–bedded pen within a semi-open shelter.
During the experimental period, the 2 groups received ad libitum a different legume forage: fresh sulla forage to the FSF group and alfalfa hay pellets to the AHP group. Sulla forage (variety Sparacia) was harvested daily by hand from a second-year sward that had not been previously grazed, and distributed to lambs two times in a day. All lambs received ad libitum a concentrate mixture of faba bean (Vicia faba var. minor L.) and barley mixture (76:24 on as fed basis), in form of coarsely ground meal. Forages and concentrate were daily supplied in amounts to ensure that refusals were higher than 20%.
After a 15-day phase of lamb’s adaptation to the housing conditions and the experimental diets, the experiment lasted 48 days, until slaughter occurred at a lamb’s average age of 128±8 day.
The experiment protocol had the approval of the Animal Welfare Body of the University of Palermo (Prot. 203099-13/12/2023), who ruled as not applicable the requirements established by the Italian Legislative Decree n. 26/2014 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, implementing Directive 2010/63/EU.

2.2. Measurements and Analyses

Data recording and feeds sampling started after the 15-day adaptation phase. The offered and refused feeds were weighed daily and sampled weekly for each pen, to calculate weekly feed intake and estimate the related chemical composition of ingested FSF.
Samples of offered and refused feeds were analyzed following AOAC (2012) [39] procedures for DM (method 967.03), crude protein (CP, N×6.25) (method 2001.11), ether extract (method 920.39), and ash (method 942.05). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF), both treated with heat-stable amylase and inclusive of residual ash, and acid detergent lignin (ADL) were determined according to Van Soest et al. (1991) [40]. Non-fiber carbohydrate (NFC) content was calculated by difference, using the formula NFC = 100 – (% CP + % ether extract + % ash + % NDF). The net energy for gain (Mcal/kg DM) of forages and concentrate was estimated according to INRA (2018) [41].
Extracts from lyophilized samples of FSF were prepared in duplicate, as described by Gannuscio et al. (2022) [32], and analyzed for CT using the butanol-HCl-Fe+3 assay and delphinidin as reference standard [42]; the absorbance of extracts was read at 550 nm in duplicate using a HACH DR3900 spectrophotometer (Hach, Loveland, CO, USA), and results were expressed as delphinidin equivalent (g DE/kg DM).
The FA composition of samples (50 mg) of lyophilized offered FSF, alfalfa hay and concentrate components was determined using the one-step extraction and transesterification procedure reported by Sukhija and Palmquist (1988) [43]. Each FA was identified as described for meat FA analyses, whereas the total and individual FA quantification was obtained using C23:0 (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) as internal standard at a concentration of 0.4 mg/g lyophilized sample, and expressed as g/kg DM.
Lambs’ body weight was monitored weekly and recorded at start (day 1) and end (day 48) of experiment. Before slaughter, the lambs were fasted for 12 hours, then they were transported to the slaughterhouse and weighed. The gastrointestinal content was removed and weighed to calculate the empty body weight. The hot carcasses were weighed and maintained at ambient temperature (>10 °C) for 6 hours, then chilled to 4 °C and weighed again at 24 hours after slaughter. Perirenal and pelvic fat, hind leg, and Longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle were removed from the right half of the carcass and their weights were recorded. Hing leg was dissected to weigh its tissue components (lean meat, fat, and bone).
The pH of LD muscle was measured using a Hanna HI 9025 pH meter (Hanna Instruments Inc., MI, USA) equipped with a penetrating probe. The colour of perirenal fat and the LD section cut between the last thoracic and first lumbar vertebrae was assessed after 1 hour of blooming in duplicate by a Minolta Chroma Meter CR-300 (Minolta, Osaka, Japan) using the illuminant C; after standardization by a white plate, lightness (L*, range values from 0 = black to 100 = white), redness (a*, range values from red = +a* to green = ₋a*) and yellowness (b*, range values from yellow = +b* to blue = ₋b*) were measured according to the CIE L*a*b* system [44]. Chroma (colour intensity or saturation; 0 = gray) was calculated as (a*2 + b*2)0.5, whereas hue angle (colour tone; 0° = purple red) was calculated as arctangent(b*/a*) [45].
Then the LD samples were vacuum-packed and frozen at -20°C for later analyses. For thawing, the LD meat was kept at 4 °C for 24 hours and weighed to determine the thawing loss. Then LD samples were wrapped in polyethylene bags, heated at 75 °C for 40 min in a water bath, and reweighed to calculate the cooking loss. To estimate tenderness, the Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF, kg/cm2) was measured on four cylinders (12.7 mm) excised from each cooked sample of LD meat with an Instron 5564 tester (Instron, Trezzano sul Naviglio, Milano, Italy).
Moisture, fat, and ash content were determined in LD meat according to AOAC (2012) [39] methods; protein percentage was calculated by difference (100 – % water – % fat – % ash), in accordance with Bonanno et al. (2011) [2].
The sensory evaluation of LD meat cooked on an electric grill was performed by triangle discriminant tests [46], involving a panel of 16 untrained volunteers, selected for their habitual consumption of lamb meat, in two separate sessions. In each test, three meat portions of approximately 40 g, two of which belong to the same dietary treatment, were offered hot for tasting to each panelist, who was asked to identify the different sample and indicate the degree of difference perceived. Each panelist compared meat from lambs fed FSF and AHP in both triangular combinations (FSF/FSF/AHP and AHP/AHP/FSF).

2.3. Intramuscular Fatty Acid Analysis

Extraction of lipids from 1 g of lyophilized LD meat and preparation of FA methyl esters (FAME) were performed following the method of O'Fallon et al. (2007) [47], as described by Di Grigoli et al. (2019) [48]. Briefly, 1 g of sample was hydrolyzed with KOH (0.7 mL) in methanol (5.3 mL), and methylated directly by H2SO4 catalysis. The FAME were recovered in 1.5 mL hexane, and 1 μL of each sample was injected using an auto-sampler into an HP 6890 GC system equipped with a flame ionization detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Separation of FAME was achieved using a CP-Sil 88 capillary column (100 m long, 0.25 mm internal diameter, 0.25 µm film thickness; Chrompack, Middelburg, The Netherlands). Gas chromatography conditions and identification were as follows: the initial oven temperature was set at 150 °C for 5 min, then increased at a rate of 1 °C/min to 160 °C held for 11 min, and finally increased at a rate of 7 °C/min to a final temperature of 230 °C, maintained for 9 min; helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min; the injector temperature was maintained at 200 °C, while the detector temperature was set at 250°C.
Each FA was identified by comparing its retention times to those of a FAME hexane mix solution C4-C24 (Supelco, Bellafonte, PA, USA). A commercial standard was used to identify the RA (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy). Individual FA were reported as g/100 g of the total identified FAME. The value of meat fat was calculated as health promoting index = (n-3 PUFA + n-6 PUFA + monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA)) / (C12:0 + 4 × C14:0 + C16:0) [49].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were statistically analyzed using the SAS 9.2 software [50]. The weekly data related to lambs’ feed intake, with pen as experimental unit, were analysed according to a MIXED model including the fixed effect of diet (FSF and AHP) and the random effect of pen, this latter regarded as error term. The parameters referred to lambs’ growth, carcass and meat traits, with the individual lamb as experimental unit, were analysed by the GLM (General Linear Model) procedure using a oneway model considering the effect of diet. The significance of the differences due to the diet in sensory triangle tests was evaluated using the reference tables from Amerine et al. (1965) [50].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Feeds Composition, Growth and Intake

Table 1 shows the chemical composition of dietary components offered to the two experimental groups of lambs, as well as that of ingested FSF. Compared to alfalfa hay, the offered FSF was characterized by a higher energy level, mainly due to the lower content of fibrous fractions, and showed a double concentration of ALA. A similar composition of the offered FSF was observed in spring by Bonanno et al. (2011) [2] when compared the growth performance of lambs fed with sulla or ryegrass green forage. The improvement of ingested FSF in comparison with offered FSF, especially with regard to CP and CT, both increased by 2 percentage points, is attributable to the lambs’ preference for the more palatable parts of sulla plant, such as leaves and flowers; indeed these parts are more rich in protein and phenolic compounds than stems [28].
ADL = acid detergent lignin. OA = oleic acid. LA = linoleic acid. ALA = α-linolenic acid.
The effects of diet on lambs growth and feed intake are shown in Table 2. Although the lambs fed FSF showed a slightly higher growth rate and final body weight than AHP lambs, the differences did not reach significant levels, thus the growth performance have to be assumed comparable between lambs fed the different diets. The average weight gain of lambs fed FSF was lower by 30 g daily than that recorded by Bonanno et al. (2011) [2] for Comisana lambs received the same diets; the greater growth of those lambs could be attributed to the warmer season in which that experiment was carried out (spring vs winter), and to the older age of growing lambs (100-150 vs 80-128 days). Priolo et al. (2005) [38] observed a slower growth in lambs of the same breed and age fed an exclusively sulla-based diet.
On the contrary, significant differences between groups emerged for the lambs’ DM intake (825 vs 924 g/day per head for AHP and FSF, respectively; p=0.0402), as well as for the daily intake of most nutrients and net energy, always higher for the FSF group. These results mainly depended on the higher forage intake of the more palatable FSF in comparison with alfalfa hay (451 vs 306 g/day per head; p<0.0001), as also emerged when Bonanno et al. (2011) [2] compared sulla and ryegrass, both as fresh forage. It has been noted that the higher FSF consumption was balanced by a tendency reduction in concentrate intake (p=0.0934), that led to a significant lower incidence of concentrate in the diet (p<0.0001) and equal feed conversion ratio between the groups (4.90), implying a profitable reduction of feeding cost linked to the concentrate integration.

3.2. Carcass and Meat Traits

Table 3 shows the parameters recorded at slaughter. The effect of diet emerged at tendency level (p=0.0673) for the percentage of perirenal and pelvic fat, and especially for the incidence of fat tissue on hind leg, which were both lower in the carcasses of lambs fed FSF. The minor presence of adipose depots in the FSF carcasses can be attributed to the lower intake of starch with the concentrate, associated with the effect of CT in reducing starch degradability in the rumen, and thus the production of propionic acid involved in lipogenesis [52]. The lower fatness of carcass can be also related to the combined effects of the higher intake of protein occurred with FSF diet, and the protection of dietary protein exercised by CT that, improving the efficiency of protein utilization [14], could have promoted the muscle development rather than the fat deposition. Indeed CT, being able to bind dietary proteins, protect them from degradation in the rumen [16,17,18,53], favour their escape in the intestinal tract to be digested, thus increasing the amino acids availability for protein synthesis in muscle tissue and reducing the energy deposited as fat. However, no difference in fat level was observed by Priolo et al. (2005) [38] in carcasses of equal weight from lamb fed exclusive FSF or oat hay with concentrate, whereas Bonanno et al. (2011) [2] reported a higher fatness in the heavier carcasses obtained from lambs fed FSF than in lighter ones from lambs receiving fresh ryegrass.
Table 4 reports the physicochemical characteristics of Longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle as a function of the diet. Meat from lambs fed FSF showed higher values of yellowness (b*) and hue angle than that of the AHP group, indicating a more intense yellow tone, presumably due to the transfer of carotenoids pigments, present in higher amount in green forage than in hay [54]. Indeed, analogous increases of yellowness (b*) and hue angle were observed by Priolo et al. (2005) [38] comparing meat from lambs fed FSF or oat hay with concentrate, whereas no significant difference emerged between lambs fed sulla or ryegrass, both as fresh forage [2]. However, the diet did not affect the colour of perirenal fat. Moreover, intramuscular fat resulted significantly lower in FSF meat, in line with the reduced carcass adiposity. Therefore, feeding hay induced precocious fat infiltration, whereas feeding green forage containing CT delayed the maturation allowing to obtain more lean meat, in line with the consumers interest in healthier and environmentally friendly products obtained in extensive systems. However, the higher fatness of meat from lambs fed AHP did not correspond to a higher tenderness, since the WBSF was not influenced by the diet.
In triangle tests, panelists did not detect sensory differences between meat from the two dietary treatments at significant level, since the incidence of their correct answers in identifying the different meat sample was equal to 7/16, and the degree of perceived differences were indicated as weak. This result suggests that feeding FSF did not determine alteration of meat flavour attributable to skatole produced in the rumen and accumulated in the fat. However, Priolo et al. (2005) [38] found no effect of CT from FSF provided as exclusive diet in reducing skatole concentration in the perirenal fat of lambs, presumably linked to the higher intake of green forage occurred in that study.

3.3. Intramuscular Fatty Acid Composition

Table 5 shows the effect of diet on FA composition of LD muscle. Among the prevalent SFA, the FSF diet was responsible of the reduction of myristic acid (C14:0) and stearic acid (C18:0), whereas lauric acid (C12:0) and palmitic acid (C16:0), as well as the total SFA, were detected at levels comparable with those of AHP diet. As known, dietary guidelines recommend reducing the consumption of saturated fats to avoid the increase of serum cholesterol and, consequently, prevent the risk of cardiovascular diseases [26]. In this regard, the hypercholesterolemic effect is retained relevant only for myristic acid (C14:0), lower for lauric acid (C12:0) and palmitic acid (C16:0), whereas stearic acid (C18:0) seems to be characterized by a cholesterol-lowering action [55,56,57,58]. On this basis, the reduction of myristic acid (C14:0) represents a beneficial effect attributable to the FSF diet. However, recent meta-analysis highlighted how high saturated fat intake can contribute to reducing the risk of stroke [58] and found no relationship linking the intake of whole-fat dairy products with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases [59].
The intramuscular fat of meat from lambs fed FSF was characterized by a higher content in oleic acid (OLA, C18:1 c9), which was the predominant FA in both groups, and trans-vaccenic acid (TVA, C18:1 t11), that together contributed to increase the total (MUFA) in the fat of FSF meat, as also found by Priolo et al. (2005) [38] in lambs fed with FSF. The increase of OLA can be related to the concomitant reduction of stearic acid with FSF diet; indeed, stearic acid, derived mainly by the activity of ruminal microbiota in biohydrogenating dietary LA and ALA, can be converted to OLA by action of Δ9-desaturase in the animal tissues, as reported by Priolo et al. (2005) [38]. Instead, the increase of TVA with FSF diet can be referred to the ability of CT in limiting in the rumen the complete biohydrogenation of dietary PUFA to stearic acid [23].
In particular, CT seem to have contributed to limiting slightly the biohydrogenation of ALA, which was highly represented in FSF (16 g/kg DM, Table 1), until to TVA, and inhibiting more greatly the successive step from TVA to stearic acid; this condition also supports the reduction of stearic acid and the increase of TVA recorded with the FSF diet. As known, also TVA is subjected to the action of Δ9-desaturase in the animal tissues to obtain RA, of which TVA represents the precursor. Although Δ9-desaturase is active on different medium- and long-chain FA, the main substrates are stearic acid desaturated to OLA, and TVA, whose conversion to RA represents the main origin of this bioactive CLA in products derived from ruminants [60]. Thus, the effect of CT in enhancing TVA and the conversion of TVA to RA explains the higher level of RA detected in FSF than in AHP meat.
These results confirm the role of CT present in FSF in inhibiting the rumen biohydrogenation of dietary LA and ALA, and favouring the reduction of stearic C18:0, the accumulation of TVA and, consequently, the successive conversion of TVA to RA in animal tissues [14]. Thus, these results also confirm the effect of feeding FSF, rich in ALA as well as in CT, in enhancing the levels of TVA and RA in the lamb meat. It is known that RA, the main isomer of CLA, can be synthesized in the rumen by isomerization of LA, but most of it is formed by desaturation of TVA in the tissues of ruminants. The health benefits of RA are well-known, including its antitumor activity and its active role in the prevention of atherosclerosis by reducing plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels, thus protecting against cardiovascular diseases [25,26,48,61,62,63]. Among the factors influencing the RA content in ruminant products, feeding plays one of the main roles, as the diet provides the precursors (LA and ALA) from which the RA derives. In this regard, a fresh forage diet with a high PUFA content is known to be responsible for the enrichment of ruminant products with RA [64,65].
The diet did not affect the amount of some n-3 or n-6 FA, with the exception of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, C20:5 n3), which was higher in AHP diets. Thus, the total n-3 and n-6 FA, as well as the total SFA and PUFA and their ratios, including the health promoting index, were not modified by the feeding system. Otherwise, Priolo et al. (2005) [38] found a lower level of SFA, other than higher content in ALA and RA, in meat fat of lambs fed FSF than in those fed oat hay and concentrate. Probably, in that study, the FA profile of dietary components contributed to increase the differences.

4. Conclusions

The results emerged in this investigation contributed to evaluating the effects of a diet based on fresh sulla forage containing condensed tannins on lamb meat production and quality, with particular regard to meat FA profile, by comparison with a tannin-free diet based on a dry forage as alfalfa hay.
The fresh sulla-based diet promoted the lambs voluntary forage intake that, balanced by a reduction of concentrate ingestion, did not allow improvements in terms of growth and carcass weight and yield, but led to an equal feed conversion, implying lower feed costs.
Nevertheless, sulla forage induced a more intense yellow colour in meat and contributed to reduce the adiposity of the carcasses and the intramuscular fat content.
Feeding sulla forage improved meat FA profile by reducing the hypercolesterolemic myristic acid (C12:0), and increasing the rumenic acid (CLA C18:2 c9t11) and its precursor trans vaccenic acid (C18:1 t11), both these latter recognized for their health benefits, thus confirming the role of condensed tannins in inhibiting the biohydrogenation of unsaturated FA in the rumen. Finally, no sensory difference or unpleasant attribute was perceived in the meat due to the diet.
Overall, these results confirm the positive effects of fresh sulla forage in reducing carcass and meat fatness and improving the health properties of intramuscular fat.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D.G. and A.B.; methodology, M.P. (Marialetizia Ponte), C.D.P. M.P. (Marianna Pipi) and R.B; formal analysis, M.P. (Marialetizia Ponte), C.D.P. M.P. (Marianna Pipi) and R.B; investigation, M.P. (Marialetizia Ponte), A.D.G and A.B.; data curation, M.P. (Marialetizia Ponte), A.D.G. and A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B.; writing—review and editing, M.P. (Marialetizia Ponte), A.D.G. and A.B.; supervision, A.B.; funding acquisition, A.D.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was developed within the project BY-BY WASTE supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR, Rome, Project of High National Interest PRIN 20227BXEYZ).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The experiment protocol had the approval of the Animal Welfare Body of the University of Palermo (Prot. 203099-13/12/2023), who ruled as not applicable the requirements established by the Italian Legislative Decree n. 26/2014 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, implementing Directive 2010/63/EU.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ADF acid detergent fiber
ADL acid detergent lignin
AHP alfalfa hay pellets
ALA α-linolenic acid
BW body weight
CLA conjugated linoleic acid
CP crude protein
CT condensed tannins
DE delphinidin equivalent
DM dry matter
DHA docosahexaenoic acid
DPA docosapentaenoic acid
EBW empty body weight
EPA eicosapentaenoic acid
FA fatty acids
FAME fatty acid methyl esters
FSF fresh sulla forage
GLA γ-linolenic acid
GLM general linear model
HC half carcass
HL hind leg
LA linoleic acid
LD Longissimus dorsi
MUFA monounsaturated fatty acids
NFC non-fiber carbohydrate
NDF neutral detergent fiber
OLA oleic acid
PUFA polyunsaturated fatty acids
RA rumenic acid
SEM standard error of mean
SFA saturated fatty acids
TVA trans vaccenic acid
UFA unsaturated fatty acids
WBSF Warner-Bratzler shear force

References

  1. Vasta, V.; Nudda, A.; Cannas, A.; Lanza, M.; Priolo, A. Alternative feed resources and their effects on the quality of meat and milk from small ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2008, 147(1-3), 223-246. [CrossRef]
  2. Bonanno, A.; Di Miceli, G.; Di Grigoli, A.; Frenda, A.S.; Tornambè, G.; Giambalvo, D.; Amato, G. Effects of feeding green forage of sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.) on lamb growth, gastrointestinal nematode infection, and carcass and meat quality. Animal 2011, 5, 148-154. [CrossRef]
  3. Salami, S.A.; Luciano, G.; O'Grady, M.N.; Biondi, L.; Newbold, C.J.; Kerry, J.P.; Priolo, A. Sustainability of feeding plant by-products: A review of the implications for ruminant meat production. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2019, 251, 37-55. [CrossRef]
  4. Priolo, A.; Micol, D.; Agabriel, J.; Prache, S.; Dransfield, E. Effect of grass or concentrate feeding systems on lamb carcass and meat quality. Meat Science 2002, 62, 179-185. [CrossRef]
  5. Chiofalo, B.; Simonella, S.; Di Grigoli, A.; Liotta, L.; Frenda, A.S.; Lo Presti, V.; Bonanno, A.; Chiofalo, V. Chemical and acidic composition of Longissimus dorsi muscle of Comisana lambs fed with Trifolium subterraneum and Lolium multiflorum. Small Ruminant Research 2010, 88, 89–96. https://doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.12.015.
  6. Gruffat, D.; Durand, D.; Rivaroli, D.; do Prado, I.N.; Prache, S. Comparison of muscle fatty acid composition and lipid stability in lambs stall-fed or pasture-fed alfalfa with or without sainfoin pellet supplementation. Animal 2020, 14; 1093-1101. [CrossRef]
  7. Schreurs, N.M.; Lane, G.A.; Tavendale, M.H.; Barry, T.N.; McNabb, W.C. Pastoral flavour in meat products from ruminants fed fresh forages and its amelioration by forage condensed tannins. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2008, 146(3-4):193-221. [CrossRef]
  8. Priolo, A.; Vasta, V.; Fasone, V.; Lanza, C.M.; Scerra, M.; Biondi, L.; Bella, M.; Whittington, FM. Meat odour and flavour and indoles concentration in ruminal fluid and adipose tissue of lambs fed green herbage or concentrates with or without tannins. Animal 2009, 3(3):454-60. [CrossRef]
  9. Resconi, V.C.; Campo, M.M.; Font-i-Furnols, M.; Montossi, F.; Sanudo, C. Sensory evaluation of castrated lambs finished on different proportions of pasture and concentrate feeding systems. Meat Science 2009, 83, 31-37. [CrossRef]
  10. Devincenzi, T.; Prunier, A.; Méteau, K.; Prache, S. How does barley supplementation in lambs grazing alfalfa affect meat sensory quality and authentication? Animal 2019, 13; 427-434. [CrossRef]
  11. Prache, S.; Rey-Cadilhac, L.; Prunier, A. 2023. Change in fat skatole and indole content in lambs switched from a concentrate-based diet indoors to alfalfa grazing for various durations before slaughter. Meat Science 2023, 204, 109272. [CrossRef]
  12. Rochon, J.J.; Doyle, C.J.; Greef, J.M.; Hopkins, A.; Molle, G.; Sitzia, M.; Scholefield, D.; Smith, C.J. Grazing legumes in Europe: a review of their status; management; benefits; research needs and future prospects. Grass and Forage Science 2004, 59(3),197-214. [CrossRef]
  13. Rivaroli, D.; Prunier, A.; Méteau, K.; do Prado, I.N.; Prache, S.. Tannin-rich sainfoin pellet supplementation reduces fat volatile indoles content and delays digestive parasitism in lambs grazing alfalfa. Animal 2019, 13, 1883-1890. [CrossRef]
  14. Vasta, V.; Daghio, M.; Cappucci, A.; Buccioni, A.; Serra, A.; Viti, C.; Mele, M. Invited review: Plant polyphenols and rumen microbiota responsible for fatty acid biohydrogenation, fiber digestion, and methane emission: Experimental evidence and methodological approaches. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102(5), 3781-3804. [CrossRef]
  15. Menci, R.; Martin, B.; Werne, S.; Bord, C.; Ferlay, A.; Lèbre, A.; Leiber, F.; Klaiss, M.; Coppa, M.; Heckendorn, F. Supplementing goats' diet with sainfoin pellets (versus alfalfa) modifies cheese sensory properties and fatty acid profile. International Dairy Journal 2022,132:105398. [CrossRef]
  16. Makkar, H.P.S. Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals; adaptation to tannins; and strategies to overcome detrimental effect of feeding tannin rich feeds. Small Rumin. Res. 2003, 49, 241–256. [CrossRef]
  17. Min, B.R.; Barry, T.N.; Attwood, G.T.; McNabb, W.C. The effect of condensed tannins on the nutrition and health of ruminants fed fresh temperate forages: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2003, 106, 3-19. [CrossRef]
  18. Piluzza, G.; Sulas, L.; Bullitta, S. Tannins in forage plants and their role in animal husbandry and environmental sustainability: a review. Grass Forage Sci. 2014, 69, 32-48. [CrossRef]
  19. Hoste, H.; Jackson, F.; Athanasiadou, S.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Hoskin, S.O. The effects of tannin-rich plants on parasitic nematodes in ruminants. Trends Parasitol. 2006, 22, 253-261. [CrossRef]
  20. Soldado, D.; Bessa, R.J.; Jerónimo, E. Condensed Tannins as Antioxidants in Ruminants -Effectiveness and Action Mechanisms to Improve Animal Antioxidant Status and Oxidative Stability of Products. Animals 2021, 11(11), 3243. [CrossRef]
  21. Luciano, G.; Monahan, F.J.; Vasta, V.; Biondi, L.; Lanza, M.; Priolo, ADietary tannins improve lamb meat colour stability. Meat science. 2009, 81(1):120-5. [CrossRef]
  22. Vasta, V.; Mele, M.; Serra, A.; Scerra, M.; Luciano, G.; Lanza, M.; Priolo, A. Metabolic fate of fatty acids involved in ruminal biohydrogenation in sheep fed concentrate or herbage with or without tannins. Journal of animal science 2009, 87(8), 2674-2684. [CrossRef]
  23. Frutos, P.; Hervás, G.; Natalello, A.; Luciano, G.; Fondevila, M.; Priolo, A.; Toral, P.G. Ability of tannins to modulate ruminal lipid metabolism and milk and meat fatty acid profiles. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2020, 269, 114623. [CrossRef]
  24. Boukrouh, S.; Noutfia, A.; Moula, N.; Avril, C.; Hornick, J.-L.; Chentouf, M.; Cabaraux, J.-F. Effects of Sulla Flexuosa Hay as Alternative Feed Resource on Goat’s Milk Production and Quality. Animals 2023, 13, 709. [CrossRef]
  25. Shingfield, K.J.; Chilliard, Y.; Toivonen, V.; Kairenius, P.; Givens, D.I. Trans Fatty Acids and Bioactive Lipids in Ruminant Milk. In: Bösze; Z. (eds) Bioactive Components of Milk. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; vol 606. Springer; New York; NY. 2008.
  26. Parodi, P.W. Dietary guidelines for saturated fatty acids are not supported by the evidence. Int. Dairy J. 2016, 52; 115-123. [CrossRef]
  27. Ruisi, P.; Siragusa, M.; Di Giorgio, G.; Graziano, D.; Amato, G.; Carimi, F.; Giambalvo D. Pheno-morphological agronomic and genetic diversity among natural populations of sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.) collected in Sicily, Italy. Gen. Res. and Crop Ev. 2011, 58, 245-257. [CrossRef]
  28. Tava, A.; Biazzi, E.; Ronga, D.; Mella, M.; Doria, F.; D’Addabbo, T.; Candido, V.; Avato, PChemical identification of specialized metabolites from sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.) collected in southern Italy. Molecules 2021, 26(15):4606. [CrossRef]
  29. Molle, G.; Decandia, M.; Giovannetti, V.; Cabiddu, A.; Fois, N.; Sitzia, M. Responses to condensed tannins of flowering sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.) grazed by dairy sheep. Part 1: effects on feeding behaviour, intake, diet digestibility and performance. Livest. Sci. 2009, 123, 138:146. [CrossRef]
  30. Bonanno, A.; Di Grigoli, A.; Montalbano, M.; Bellina, V.; Mazza, F.; Todaro, M. Effects of diet on casein and fatty acid profiles of milk from goats differing in genotype for αS1-casein synthesis. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2013, 237, 951-963. [CrossRef]
  31. Bonanno, A.; Di Grigoli, A.; Mazza, F.; De Pasquale, C.; Giosuè, C.; Vitale, F.; Alabiso, M. Effects of ewes grazing sulla or ryegrass pasture for different daily durations on forage intake, milk production and fatty acid composition of cheese. Animal 2016, 10(12), 2074-2082. [CrossRef]
  32. Gannuscio, R.; Ponte, M.; Di Grigoli, A.; Maniaci, G.; Di Trana, A.; Bacchi, M.; Alabiso, M.; Bonanno, A.; Todaro, M. Feeding Dairy Ewes with Fresh or Dehydrated Sulla (Sulla coronarium L.) Forage. 1. Effects on Feed Utilization, Milk Production, and Oxidative Status. Animals 2022, 12, 2317. [CrossRef]
  33. Cabiddu, A.; Molle, G.; Decandia, M.; Spada, S.; Fiori, M.; Piredda, G.; Addis, M. Responses to condensed tannins of flowering sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.) grazed by dairy sheep. Part 2: effects on milk fatty acid profile. Livest. Sci. 2009, 123, 230-240. [CrossRef]
  34. Ponte, M.; Maniaci, G.; Di Grigoli, A.; Gannuscio, R.; Ashkezary, M.R.; Addis, M.; Pipi, M.; Alabiso, M.; Todaro, M.; Bonanno, A. Feeding Dairy Ewes with Fresh or Dehydrated Sulla (Sulla coronarium L.) Forage. 2. Effects on Cheese Enrichment in Bioactive Molecules. Animals 2022, 12, 2462. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ani12182462.
  35. Di Trana, A.; Bonanno, A.; Cecchini, S.; Giorgio, D.; Di Grigoli, A.; Claps S. Effects of Sulla forage (Sulla coronarium L.) on the oxidative status and milk polyphenol content in goats. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 37-46. [CrossRef]
  36. Giorgio, D.; Di Trana, A.; Di Gregorio, P.; Rando, A.; Avondo, M.; Bonanno, A.; Valenti, B.; Di Grigoli A. Oxidative status of goats with different CSN1S1 genotypes fed ad libitum with fresh and dry forages. Antioxidants 2020, 9(3), 224. [CrossRef]
  37. Burke, J.L.; Waghorn, G.C.; McNabb, W.C.; Brookes, I.M. The potential of sulla in pasture-based system. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2004, 25, 25-28.
  38. Priolo, A.; Bella, M.; Lanza, M.; Galofaro, V.; Biondi, L.; Barbagallo, D.; Ben Salem, P.; Pennisi, P. Carcass and meat quality of lambs fed fresh sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.) with or without polyethylene glycol or concentrate. Small Rumin. Res. 2005, 59(2-3), 281-288. [CrossRef]
  39. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 19th ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2012.
  40. Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583-3597. [CrossRef]
  41. INRA. INRA feeding system for ruminants; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2018, 640 pp.
  42. Porter, L.J.; Hrstick, L.N.; Chan, B.G. The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyniadin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry 1986, 25, 223-230. [CrossRef]
  43. Sukhija, P.S.; Palmquist, D.L. Rapid method for determination of total fatty acid content and composition of feedstuffs and feces. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1988, 36, 1202–1206.
  44. CIE (Commission International de l’Eclairage). Colorimetry–Official Recommendations of the International Commission on Illumination; CIE Publication No. 15.2; CIE Central Bureau: Vienna, Austria, 1986.
  45. Liu, Q.; Scheller, K.; Karp, S.C.; Schaefer, D.M.; Frigg, M. Colour coordinates for assessment of dietary vitamin E effects on beef colour stability. J. Anim. Sci. 1996. 74; 106–116. [CrossRef]
  46. ISO. ISO 4120:2004 Sensory Analysis-Methodology-Triangle Test; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
  47. O’Fallon, J.V.; Busboom, J.R.; Nelson, M.L.; Gaskins, C.T. A direct method for fatty acid methyl ester synthesis: Application to wet meat tissues; oils; and feedstuffs. J Anim. Sci. 2007, 85(6); 1511-1521. [CrossRef]
  48. Di Grigoli, A.; Bonanno, A.; Rabie Ashkezary, M.; Laddomada, B.; Alabiso, M.; Vitale, F.; Mazza, F.; Maniaci, G.; Ruisi, P.; Di Miceli, G. Meat Production from Dairy Breed Lambs Due to Slaughter Age and Feeding Plan Based on Wheat Bran. Animals 2019, 9, 892. [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, S.; Bobe, G.; Zimmerman, S.; Hammond, E.G.; Luhman, C.M.; Boylston, T.D.; Freeman, A.E.; Beitz, D.C. Physical and sensory properties of dairy products from cows with various milk fatty acid compositions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 3422-3428. [CrossRef]
  50. SAS (Statistical Analysis Systems Institute). SAS/STAT qualification tools user’s guide, version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA, 2010.
  51. Amerine, M.A.; Pangborn, R.M.; Roessler, E.B. Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1965.
  52. Bessa, R.J.B; Alves, S.P.; Santos-Silva J. Constraints and potentials for the nutritional modulation of the fatty acid composition of ruminant meat. [review]. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 2015, 117(9); 1325–1344. [CrossRef]
  53. Waghorn, G. Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production: progress and challenges. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2008, 147, 116–139. [CrossRef]
  54. Prache, S.; Priolo, A.; Grolier, P. Effect of concentrate finishing on the carotenoid content of perirenal fat in grazing sheep: its significance for discriminating grass fed; concentrate fed and concentrate-finished grazing lambs. Anim. Sci. 2003, 77, 225 233. [CrossRef]
  55. Santos-Silva, J.; Bessa, R.J.B.; Santos-Silva, F. Effect of genotype, feeding system and slaughter weight on the quality of light lambs. II. Fatty acid composition of meat. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2002, 77, 187–194. [CrossRef]
  56. Lecerf, J,M. Fatty acids and cardiovascular disease. Nutrition reviews 2009, 67(5), 273-283. [CrossRef]
  57. Renna, M.; Lussiana, C.; Malfatto, V.; Battaglini, L. PDO cheeses from Piedmont (NW Italy): amount and variability of fatty acids of nutritional interest. Scienza e Tecnica Lattiero-Casearia 2015, 66 (1-2), 27-37.
  58. Kang, Z.Q.; Yang, Y.; Xiao, B. Dietary saturated fat intake and risk of stroke: systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020, 30(2), 179-189. [CrossRef]
  59. Astrup, A.; Magkos, F.; Bier, D.M.; Brenna, J.T.; de Oliveira Otto, M.C.; Hill, J.O.; King, J.C.; Mente, A.; Ordovas, J.M.; Volek, J.S.; Yusuf, S.; Krauss, R.M. Saturated fats and health: a reassessment and proposal for food-based recommendations: JACC state-of-the-art review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 76(7), 844-857. [CrossRef]
  60. Hervás, G.; Frutos, P.; Toral, P.G. Endogenous synthesis of milk cis-9 trans-11 CLA in dairy ewes: quantification using 13C-labeled vaccenic acid and comparison with estimations based on cobalt administration J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103; 368-378. [CrossRef]
  61. Parodi, P. W. Milk fat nutrition. In A. Y. Tamime (Ed.), Dairy fats and related products, 28-51. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
  62. Dilzer, A.; Park, Y. Implication of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in human health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 52, 488–513. [CrossRef]
  63. Kim, J.H.; Kim, Y.; Kim, Y.J.; Park, Y. Conjugated linoleic acid: Potential health benefits as a functional food ingredient. Ann. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 7, 221–244. [CrossRef]
  64. French, P.C.; Stanton, C.; Lawless, F.; O”Riordan, G.; Monahan, F.J.; Caffrey, P.J. Fatty acid composition including conjugated linoleic acid, of intramuscular fat from steers offered grazed grass, grass silage or concentrate-based diets. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 78, 2849-2855. [CrossRef]
  65. Hur, S.J.; Kim, H.S.; Bahk, Y.Y.; Park, Y. Overview of conjugated linoleic acid formation and accumulation in animal products. Livest. Sci. 2017, 195, 105-111. [CrossRef]
Table 1. Chemical composition and fatty acid profile of offered diet components and ingested fresh sulla forage (g/kg DM).
Table 1. Chemical composition and fatty acid profile of offered diet components and ingested fresh sulla forage (g/kg DM).
Offered diet components Ingested fresh sulla forage
Faba bean Barley Concentrate1 Alfalfa hay pellets Fresh sulla forage
DM, % 868 906 877 910 148 145
Crude protein (CP) 246 105 212 181 174 194
Ether extract 15.5 21.1 16.9 27.4 28.9 32.3
Ash 34.0 28.8 32.7 96.4 122 124
NFC 560 671 587 230 273 275
NDF 144 174 151 465 402 374
ADF 111 86.2 105 375 350 328
ADL 7.10 11.9 8.26 82.5 77.2 75.5
Net energy for gain, Mcal/kg DM 2.03 2.02 2.03 1.04 1.37 1.43
Condensed tannins - - 15.6 17.7
C12:0 0.02 0.08 0.03 0.11 0.14
C14:0 0.03 0.32 0.10 0.35 0.25
C16:0 1.76 3.28 2.14 4.00 3.73
C18:0 0.33 0.52 0.37 1.07 0.73
C18:1 c9, OA 2.45 3.37 2.68 1.86 0.90
C18:2 c6c12 n-6, LA 7.97 8.74 8.16 5.62 2.56
C18:3 c9c12c15 n-3, ALA 0.58 1.03 0.69 8.36 16.15
1Faba bean and barley mixture (0.76:0.24 on as fed basis). DM = dry matter. NFC = non-fiber carbohydrate = 100 – (% NDF + % CP + % ether extract + % ash) NDF = neutral detergent fiber, inclusive of residual ash. ADF = acid detergent fiber, inclusive of residual ash.
Table 2. Effects of diet on lamb growth and daily feed intake.
Table 2. Effects of diet on lamb growth and daily feed intake.
Diet SEM p-value
Alfalfa hay pellets
AHP
Fresh sulla forage
FSF
Initial body weight, kg 17.6 18.0 0.93 0.7556
Final body weight, kg 26.0 27.3 0.87 0.2867
Average weight gain 80-128 days, g/day 176 195 10.7 0.2103
Feed conversion ratio 4.90 4.90 0.29 0.9872
Daily concentrate intake, g DM/head 520 473 19.4 0.0934
Daily concentrate intake, % diet DM intake 64.2 51.3 1.02 <0.0001
Daily forage intake, g/head
DM 306 451 17.2 <0.0001
Crude protein (CP) 55.4 86.6 3.14 <0.0001
Ether extract (EE) 8.38 14.4 0.47 <0.0001
Ash 29.5 56.0 2.00 <0.0001
NDF 142 172 8.17 0.0123
ADF 115 149 6.53 0.0003
ADL 25.2 33.9 1.44 <0.0001
NFC 70.4 122 3.88 <0.0001
Condensed tannins 8.05
Net energy for gain, Mcal/head 0.32 0.64 0.021 <0.0001
Daily diet intake, g/head
DM 825 924 33.5 0.0402
Crude protein (CP) 166 187 6.63 0.0252
Ether extract (EE) 17.2 22.4 0.74 <0.0001
Ash 46.5 71.4 2.44 <0.0001
NDF 221 243 10.4 0.1297
ADF 169 199 8.06 0.0098
ADL 29.5 37.8 1.56 0.0003
NFC 376 400 14.1 0.2196
Net energy for gain, Mcal/head 1.37 1.60 0.055 0.0038
DM = dry matter. NDF = neutral detergent fiber, inclusive of residual ash. ADF = acid detergent fiber, inclusive of residual ash. ADL = acid detergent lignin. NFC = non-fiber carbohydrate = 100 – (% CP + % EE + % ash + % NDF). SEM = standard error of mean.
Table 3. Effects of diet on carcass traits of lambs.
Table 3. Effects of diet on carcass traits of lambs.
Diet SEM p-value
Alfalfa hay pellets
AHP
Fresh sulla forage
FSF
Final body weight (BW) after 12 h-fasting, kg 24.4 25.4 0.84 0.4154
Empty body weight (EBW), kg 21.7 22.9 0.75 0.2890
Hot carcass, kg 11.5 12.0 0.45 0.4970
Carcass at 24 h, kg 11.1 11.5 0.45 0.4894
Hot carcass yield, % BW 47.1 46.9 0.49 0.7248
Hot carcass yield, % EBW 53.0 52.1 0.45 0.1684
Carcass yield at 24 h, % BW 45.4 45.3 0.50 0.8168
Carcass yield at 24 h, % EBW 51.1 50.3 0.48 0.2504
Half carcass (HC), kg 5.48 5.72 0.22 0.4678
Perirenal and pelvic fat, % HC 2.04 1.62 0.16 0.0673
Hind leg (HL), kg 1.44 1.43 0.048 0.9036
Meat, % HL 67.4 68.5 0.71 0.2640
Fat, % HL 9.13 7.65 0.38 0.0120
Bone, % HL 23.5 23.8 0.72 0.7491
HL meat/bone ratio 2.87 2.94 0.10 0.6501
SEM = standard error of mean.
Table 4. Effects of diet on physicochemical characteristics of lamb meat.
Table 4. Effects of diet on physicochemical characteristics of lamb meat.
Diet SEM p-value
Alfalfa hay pellets
AHP
Fresh sulla forage
FSF
Longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle
  pH at 24 h 6.12 6.22 0.088 0.4019
  Lightness, L* 46.2 46.5 0.77 0.7849
  Redness, a* 18.9 19.9 0.60 0.2539
  Yellowness, b* 6.38 7.90 0.46 0.0273
  Chroma 20.0 21.5 0.70 0.1540
  Hue angle 18.4 21.4 0.83 0.0175
  Thawing loss, % 5.64 6.42 0.86 0.5274
  Cooking loss, % 26.7 26.6 0.48 0.8256
  Total loss, % 30.9 31.3 0.98 0.7861
  WBSF after cooking, kg/cm2 3.18 3.03 0.079 0.2111
  Moisture, g/kg 739 746 4.23 0.2379
  Protein, g/kg 189 196 2.42 0.0720
  Fat, g/kg 61.0 47.0 5.92 0.0186
  Ash, g/kg 10.5 10.8 0.15 0.2086
Perirenal fat
  Lightness, L* 79.2 78.2 0.49 0.1957
  Redness, a* 8.39 8.22 0.31 0.7079
  Yellowness, b* 8.49 9.34 0.41 0.1568
  Chroma 11.9 12.5 0.44 0.3770
  Hue angle 45.5 48.2 1.28 0.1406
WBSF = Warner-Bratzler shear force. SEM = standard error of mean.
Table 5. Effects of diet on fatty acid (FA) composition (g/100 g identified FAME).
Table 5. Effects of diet on fatty acid (FA) composition (g/100 g identified FAME).
Diet SEM p-value
Alfalfa hay pellets
AHP
Fresh sulla forage
FSF
C10:0 0.34 0.29 0.046 0.4872
C12:0 0.65 0.40 0.17 0.3237
C14:0 2.51 2.02 0.16 0.0410
C14:1 c9 0.25 0.11 0.033 0.0063
C15:0 0.28 0.18 0.042 0.0971
C16:0 20.2 19.2 0.75 0.3440
C16:1 c9 2.70 2.71 0.21 0.9838
C17:0 2.76 1.77 0.48 0.1610
C17:1 c10 2.30 1.87 0.23 0.1936
C18:0 11.2 9.9 0.20 0.0003
C18:1 t11, TVA 0.69 1.95 0.13 <0.0001
C18:1 c9, OLA 33.0 35.5 1.01 0.0482
C18:2 c9c12 n-6, LA 7.53 7.50 0.40 0.9615
C18:3 n-6, GLA 0.68 0.32 0.15 0.0967
C18:3 n-3, ALA 1.45 1.88 0.17 0.0901
CLA C18:2 c9t11, RA 1.02 1.58 0.16 0.0197
C20:2 n-6 0.88 0.57 0.16 0.1848
C22:0 0.69 1.76 0.20 0.0013
C20:3 n-6 0.98 1.04 0.12 0.7207
C20:4 n-6 3.66 3.62 0.28 0.9209
C24:0 1.85 2.49 0.31 0.1577
C20:5 n-3, EPA 0.75 0.20 0.12 0.0037
C24:1 c15 n-9 0.89 0.55 0.16 0.1702
C22:5 n-3, DPA 1.16 1.21 0.29 0.8973
C22:6 n-3, DHA 1.60 1.38 0.24 0.5103
Saturated fatty acids (SFA) 40.5 38.0 1.18 0.1622
Monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) 39.8 42.7 0.95 0.0488
Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) 19.7 19.3 1.27 0.8185
Unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) 59.5 62.0 1.18 0.1622
SFA/UFA 0.69 0.62 0.033 0.1287
Σ n-6 PUFA 13.7 13.0 0.79 0.5485
Σ n-3 PUFA 4.97 4.67 0.66 0.7551
n-6/n-3 3.11 3.62 0.56 0.5311
Health promoting index1 1.96 2.22 0.13 0.1705
TVA = trans vaccenic acid. OLA = oleic acid. LA = linoleic acid. GLA = γ-linolenic acid. ALA = α-linolenic acid. CLA = conjugated linoleic acid. RA = rumenic acid. EPA = eicosapentaenoic acid. DPA = docosapentaenoic acid. DHA = docosahexaenoic acid. 1Health promoting index = (n-3 PUFA + n-6 PUFA + MUFA) / (C12:0 + 4 × C14:0 + C16:0) [49]. SEM = standard error of mean.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated