Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Digital Deception and the Aging Mind: A Psychological Analysis of Online Fraud Targeting Older Adults

Submitted:

26 May 2025

Posted:

28 May 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
The rise of internet connectivity among older adults has brought both enrichment and exposure to new forms of exploitation. Online fraud targeting the elderly is increasingly recognized as a multidimensional phenomenon influenced by cognitive, emotional, and social factors. Age-related changes in decision-making processes, coupled with increased social isolation and trust tendencies, heighten vulnerability to digital deception. This article offers a psychological and behavioral analysis of elder-targeted cyber scams, integrating insights from recent empirical and theoretical work. The discussion considers how aggressive digital persuasion tactics often blur the line between marketing and manipulation, disproportionately affecting older individuals. Recent studies have further shown how scam techniques exploit heuristics and cognitive decline, particularly in contexts where ethical boundaries are weakly enforced. By synthesizing literature across psychology, digital communication, and aging studies, this paper aims to illuminate mechanisms of vulnerability and offer policy-relevant recommendations for safeguarding older populations online.
Keywords: 
;  
Subject: 
Social Sciences  -   Psychology

Introduction

In an era marked by rapid technological advancement and growing digital interconnectivity, older adults have increasingly embraced the internet as a platform for social interaction, financial management, and access to health information. While this digital integration offers substantial benefits ,improving quality of life, enhancing autonomy, and bridging generational divides ,it also presents unique and growing risks. Among these, online fraud has emerged as a particularly insidious threat, disproportionately affecting the elderly (Button et al., 2014; Cross, 2016).
Elder fraud on the internet constitutes a complex psychosocial and technological phenomenon that involves the manipulation of psychological vulnerabilities specific to aging populations. Unlike traditional forms of crime, cyber fraud is often hidden, underreported, and embedded in everyday digital interactions. It exploits the anonymity and reach of the web to deliver scams that range from phishing and investment fraud to romance scams and impersonation. According to the Federal Trade Commission (2023), individuals over the age of 60 report billions of dollars in financial losses annually, though the actual figures are believed to be significantly higher due to underreporting.
The psychological mechanisms underpinning elder susceptibility to fraud are multifaceted. Aging is often accompanied by a decline in certain cognitive functions such as working memory, processing speed, and executive control (Salthouse, 2010), which can impair an individual’s ability to critically evaluate complex or deceptive online content. Moreover, older adults often exhibit higher levels of trust and reduced skepticism toward social information (Castle et al., 2012), making them attractive targets for fraudsters who leverage manipulative narratives and false authority. Emotional factors, including loneliness, grief, and a desire for social contact, can further augment vulnerability, particularly in cases involving romance or family impersonation scams (Pak & Shadel, 2011).
Recent research has emphasized that these scams do not occur in a psychological vacuum. Rather, they are designed to exploit cognitive heuristics and affective biases, often using aggressive and ethically ambiguous marketing strategies that blur the distinction between legitimate persuasion and unethical manipulation. While such tactics are not exclusive to scams, their application in targeting older adults raises profound ethical and societal concerns (Bayer, 2020). Moreover, studies such as that of Bessadok et al. (2023) have begun to explore the specific cognitive determinants ,such as inhibitory control and decision-making capacity ,that may predict susceptibility to fraud among older individuals.
Despite increased scholarly attention, gaps remain in our understanding of the psychological and contextual variables that render older adults particularly susceptible to online fraud. This article seeks to address that gap by offering an integrative analysis grounded in psychological theory and empirical evidence. Specifically, it examines the interplay between cognitive aging, emotional vulnerability, and digital manipulation strategies. In doing so, it aims to contribute to a more nuanced academic and policy discourse on elder fraud in cyberspace.
The structure of the article is as follows: first, a literature review surveys foundational and recent studies on the subject; next, we explore methodological considerations and key empirical findings that shed light on psychological mechanisms of vulnerability. This is followed by a discussion of broader implications for theory, practice, and policy. The article concludes with a synthesis of insights and a call for more targeted preventive frameworks.

Literature Review

The study of elder-targeted online fraud sits at the intersection of gerontology, psychology, digital communication, and criminology. Over the past two decades, the increasing integration of older adults into the digital ecosystem has coincided with a surge in scholarship analyzing the risks they face in cyberspace. This literature review synthesizes key findings from psychological, behavioral, and sociotechnical studies that elucidate the mechanisms of vulnerability and manipulation among older internet users.
1. Psychological Vulnerability and Cognitive Aging
A consistent theme in the literature is that cognitive aging affects information processing in ways that may impair fraud detection. Numerous studies have shown that with age, individuals experience declines in executive functioning, especially in tasks involving working memory, attention regulation, and inhibitory control (Hasher & Zacks, 1988; Salthouse, 2010). These changes may impair the ability to evaluate the credibility of online information and detect anomalies in digital interactions.
Castle et al. (2012) provided compelling evidence that older adults are less likely than younger counterparts to perceive cues of untrustworthiness in human faces ,a trait that extends to their interaction with online personas. Similarly, James et al. (2014) found that lower cognitive functioning was significantly associated with increased susceptibility to financial scams, even when controlling for education and socioeconomic status. These findings suggest that online fraud often exploits cognitive limitations that are not always visible in daily functioning but become salient in high-stakes decision-making scenarios.
The study by Bessadok et al. (2023) strengthens this link by identifying specific neuropsychological markers, including inhibitory control and susceptibility to misleading cues, as predictors of scam vulnerability. Their research emphasizes that not all older adults are equally susceptible: cognitive decline is a mediating factor, not an inevitable determinant.
2. Emotional and Social Risk Factors
In addition to cognitive decline, emotional and social variables play a crucial role in determining susceptibility. Loneliness, grief, and social isolation ,conditions that disproportionately affect the elderly ,have been repeatedly identified as significant risk factors in online fraud victimization (Pak & Shadel, 2011; DeLiema, 2018). Romance scams, in particular, thrive on emotional manipulation, with perpetrators crafting emotionally resonant narratives that elicit trust, affection, and ultimately, financial compliance.
Furthermore, social trust ,a generally positive trait associated with psychological well-being ,can paradoxically increase risk in digital contexts. Research by Boyle et al. (2014) found that older adults with higher general trust in others were more likely to comply with fraudulent email requests. This points to a mismatch between offline trust dispositions and online risk environments.
3. Digital Persuasion and Ethical Ambiguity
Scams aimed at older adults are not limited to overt deception; they often employ sophisticated persuasion techniques that borrow from the fields of marketing and behavioral economics. Techniques such as scarcity cues, false urgency, social proof, and authority impersonation are used to trigger compliance without rational deliberation (Cialdini, 2009). These methods are particularly effective among populations with diminished cognitive bandwidth or emotional regulation capacity.
Bayer (2020), in his chapter on older adults and aggressive marketing, argues that many forms of digital persuasion cross ethical boundaries, especially when directed at cognitively vulnerable individuals. He notes that older adults are frequently targeted with marketing materials that obscure the line between information and manipulation, especially in domains like health products, financial investments, and charitable donations. These ethically grey zones often serve as entry points for fraud schemes that begin as seemingly legitimate interactions.
4. The Underreporting Problem and Societal Invisibility
A persistent barrier to effective intervention is the systemic underreporting of elder fraud. Many older victims experience shame, denial, or fear of losing autonomy, which discourages disclosure (DeLiema, 2018; Cross, 2016). This invisibility has consequences not only for data collection and policy but also for academic research, which often relies on self-reported victimization. As such, the actual scope and psychological complexity of elder-targeted fraud may be broader than currently estimated.
5. Gaps and Future Directions
While the literature provides a solid foundation for understanding psychological vulnerability, several gaps remain. First, more longitudinal and experimental studies are needed to disentangle causality in the relationship between cognitive function and scam susceptibility. Second, the interaction between cultural norms, digital literacy, and psychological traits remains underexplored, particularly in non-Western contexts. Third, intervention studies ,especially those leveraging digital tools for fraud prevention ,are still in their infancy and require rigorous validation.

Findings and Discussion

The phenomenon of online fraud targeting older adults is underpinned by a convergence of cognitive, emotional, and social vulnerabilities, which are strategically exploited by technologically adept perpetrators. The literature reviewed reveals a consistent pattern: scammers rely not solely on deception, but on the activation of automatic, heuristic-based decision-making that circumvents critical scrutiny. This section interprets key findings in light of cognitive psychology and behavioral economics, discussing how these insights contribute to our theoretical and practical understanding of elder susceptibility.
1. Heuristic Processing and Cognitive Load
One of the most robust psychological mechanisms identified in recent literature is the reliance on heuristic rather than analytical processing in older adults. Due to age-related declines in fluid intelligence and working memory (Salthouse, 2010), older individuals often default to mental shortcuts when faced with complex or unfamiliar digital content. Fraudsters capitalize on this by constructing messages that appear urgent, emotionally salient, or authoritative ,triggers that elicit compliance with minimal deliberation.
Bessadok et al. (2023) offer empirical support for this mechanism, showing that poor performance on inhibitory control tasks correlates with greater acceptance of deceptive messages. Their research suggests that deficits in suppressing irrelevant or misleading information directly contribute to the success of scam narratives. Notably, this cognitive vulnerability is not uniformly distributed but varies with individual differences in neurocognitive aging ,a finding that has important implications for personalized prevention strategies.
2. The Role of Emotional Regulation and Social Need
Emotions exert a powerful influence on decision-making, particularly among older adults who often face loneliness, bereavement, or reduced social contact. These emotional states increase the motivational salience of interactions that promise connection, affection, or financial stability. Fraud schemes that simulate romantic interest or familial urgency exploit these emotional needs with precision.
Studies in affective neuroscience have shown that older adults exhibit positivity biases ,tendencies to attend more to emotionally positive stimuli (Mather & Carstensen, 2005). While this may contribute to well-being in non-threatening contexts, it also impairs the detection of emotional manipulation. Romance scams, which now constitute a growing proportion of online fraud among seniors, strategically exploit this bias by combining flattery, sustained engagement, and eventual financial requests.
In his chapter on unethical marketing, Bayer (2020) emphasizes that many commercial tactics blur the lines between influence and exploitation. Particularly in contexts involving health, finance, or caregiving, older adults are subjected to aggressive marketing that manipulates both cognitive limitations and emotional vulnerabilities. Though not always illegal, these practices share structural similarities with fraud in their use of deception, coercion, and misinformation.
3. Trust Disposition and Overconfidence
Another critical factor is the social trust disposition commonly found in older populations. While generally associated with psychological resilience and social cohesion, higher baseline trust can be maladaptive in digital environments. Fraudsters take advantage of this by adopting identities associated with institutional trust ,banks, government agencies, or family members.
Boyle et al. (2014) demonstrated that high-trust individuals are significantly more likely to engage with scam emails, suggesting that predispositions shaped by lifelong interpersonal experiences may be ill-suited to the dynamics of online interaction. Furthermore, older adults often exhibit overconfidence in their ability to detect fraud, despite empirical evidence to the contrary (Ross et al., 2014). This metacognitive miscalibration reduces vigilance and heightens risk.
4. Structural and Contextual Amplifiers
The risks posed by psychological vulnerabilities are magnified by structural factors such as digital illiteracy, inadequate consumer protection laws, and social isolation. Many older adults were not “digitally socialized” in the way younger generations were, leading to limited familiarity with digital risk indicators such as suspicious URLs, cloned websites, or phishing red flags. This knowledge gap interacts with cognitive limitations to create what DeLiema (2018) describes as a “double jeopardy” of vulnerability.
Moreover, the invisibility of elder fraud ,exacerbated by stigma, underreporting, and inadequate media coverage ,creates a feedback loop that limits both public awareness and institutional response. As long as fraud is framed as an individual failure rather than a systemic exploit of cognitive and emotional mechanisms, interventions will remain insufficiently targeted.

Conclusion

Online fraud against older adults represents not merely a technological crime, but a psychological and societal challenge of growing magnitude. As this article has shown, susceptibility to cyber scams in later life arises from an intricate interplay of cognitive decline, emotional needs, trust tendencies, and structural disadvantages. Fraudsters exploit these dimensions with increasing sophistication, crafting digital interactions that bypass rational analysis and target instinctive responses. Unlike conventional crime, cyber fraud often operates in the shadow zones of legality ,where aggressive persuasion mimics legitimate commerce and emotional manipulation blurs into predatory deception.
A key insight emerging from the literature is that elder vulnerability is not uniform but shaped by neurocognitive profiles, emotional contexts, and social environments. While certain cognitive changes ,such as diminished inhibitory control and increased heuristic reliance ,are characteristic of aging, they do not render fraud victimization inevitable. Rather, it is the convergence of these psychological traits with contextual amplifiers like digital illiteracy and social isolation that creates heightened risk. The findings by Bessadok et al. (2023) emphasize the need for early cognitive screening and targeted interventions, while Bayer's (2020) analysis of unethical marketing practices suggests the need to broaden our ethical scrutiny beyond clearly illegal conduct.
The implications of these insights are far-reaching. From a policy perspective, existing frameworks for consumer protection and elder welfare must be updated to reflect the psychological complexity of online fraud. This includes the development of digital literacy programs tailored for older users, the enforcement of ethical standards in marketing and platform design, and the establishment of reporting mechanisms that reduce stigma and facilitate support. From a research perspective, future studies must address current gaps ,particularly in longitudinal data, non-Western populations, and intervention efficacy. There is also a need for interdisciplinary collaboration that integrates cognitive psychology, cybersecurity, gerontology, and law.
Ultimately, protecting older adults in digital spaces demands more than technological solutions; it requires a reframing of vulnerability as a societal and ethical issue. Rather than attributing fraud to naïveté or poor judgment, we must recognize how the aging brain interacts with exploitative environments ,both human and algorithmic. Only by adopting this holistic view can we hope to design environments that preserve autonomy, promote dignity, and ensure security for older generations in the digital age.

References

  1. Bayer, Y.M. (2020). Older adults, aggressive marketing, and unethical behavior. In D. N. Bell, S. A. Stevens, & D. H. Solove (Eds.), Cybercrime and Digital Deviance (pp. 1–14). Routledge. [CrossRef]
  2. Bayer, Y.M. (2023) Age and Generalized Trust in the United States: What Do WVS Data Say? Preprints 2023, 2023091696. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bessadok, F. Ouellet, M. C., & Rousseau, J. (2023). Cognitive mechanisms of online scam susceptibility among older adults: Preliminary evidence from neuropsychological testing. Preprints, 202309.1696. [CrossRef]
  4. Boyle, P. A. , Yu, L., Wilson, R. S., Gamble, K., Buchman, A. S., & Bennett, D. A. (2014). Poor decision making is a consequence of cognitive decline among older persons without Alzheimer’s disease or mild cognitive impairment. PLoS ONE, 7, e43647. [CrossRef]
  5. Castle, E. Eisenberger, N. I., Seeman, T. E., Moons, W. G., Boggero, I. A., Grinblatt, M. S., & Taylor, S. E. (2012). Neural and behavioral bases of age differences in perceptions of trust. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(51), 20848–20852. [CrossRef]
  6. Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Pearson.
  7. Cross, C. (2016). Technology-facilitated fraud: Crime, perpetrators and victims. Routledge.
  8. DeLiema, M. (2018). Elder fraud and financial exploitation: Application of routine activity theory. The Gerontologist, 58(4), 706–718. [CrossRef]
  9. Federal Trade Commission. (2023). Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2022. Available online: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/csn-2022-2023-data-book.pdf.
  10. Hasher, L. , & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). Academic Press.
  11. James, B. D. , Boyle, P. A., Bennett, J. S., & Bennett, D. A. (2014). The impact of health and financial literacy on decision making in community-based older adults. Gerontology, 60. [CrossRef]
  12. Mather, M. Carstensen, L. L. (2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 496–502. [CrossRef]
  13. Pak, K. Shadel, D. (2011). AARP foundation national fraud victim study. AARP Foundation. Available online: https://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/econ/fraud-victims-11.pdf.
  14. Ross, M. Grossmann, I., & Schryer, E. (2014). Contrary to psychological and popular opinion, there is no compelling evidence that older adults are disproportionately victimized by consumer fraud. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(4), 427–442. [CrossRef]
  15. Salthouse, T. A. (2010). Major issues in cognitive aging. Oxford University Press.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated