Submitted:
04 May 2025
Posted:
06 May 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
6. Patents
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| DSE | Dobutamin Stress Echocardiography |
| SR | Strain rate |
| AFI | Automated function imaging |
| STI | Strain rate imaging |
| WMA | Wall motion ambnormality |
| SBP | Systolic blood pressure |
| DBP | Diastolyc blood pressure |
| LS | Longitudinal strain |
| EF | Ejection fraction |
| GLS | Global longitudinal strain |
| STE | Speckle tracking echocardiography |
| SLS | Systolic longitudinal strain |
| SLSR | Systolic longitudinal strain rate |
| WMSI | Wall motion score index |
| SCS | Significant coronary stenosis |
References
- Hoffmann R, Lethen H, Marwick T, Arnese M, Fioretti P, Pingitore A, et al. Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27(2):330-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, Kuehl CA, Sawada SG. American Society of Echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(9):1021-41. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A, Kasprzak J, Lancellotti P, Poldermans D, et al. European Association of Echocardiography. Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9(4):415-37. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kasprzak JD, Paelinck B, Ten Cate FJ, Vletter WB, de Jong N, Poldermans D, et al. Comparison of native and contrast-enhanced harmonic echocardiography for visualization of left ventricular endocardial border. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83(2):211-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoffmann R, Marwick TH, Poldermans D, Lethen H, Ciani R, van der Meer P, et al. Refinements in stress echocardiographic techniques improve inter-institutional agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms. Eur Heart J. 2002;23(10):821-9. [CrossRef]
- Sobkowicz B, Tomaszuk-Kazberuk A, Malyszko J, Kalinowski M, Hryszko T, Kralisz P, et al. Value of the real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for risk stratification and for the detection of significant coronary stenosis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(2):668-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lancellotti P, Pellikka PA, Budts W, Chaudhry FA, Donal E, Dulgheru R, et al. The clinical use of stress echocardiography in non-ischaemic heart disease: recommendations from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(11):1191-1229. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vasey CG, Usedom JE, Woodard SM, Bhapkar M, Schwartz T, Koch GG. Prediction of cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction: the role of maximal treadmill stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2001;14(1):38-43. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Picano E, Lattanzi F, Sicari R, Silvestri O, Polimeno S, Pingitore A, et al. Role of stress echocardiography in risk stratification early after an acute myocardial infarction. EPIC (Echo Persantin International Cooperative) and EDIC (Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative) Study Groups. Eur Heart J. 1997;18 Suppl D:D78-85. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beck E, Santillán O, Cecconi G, De Cicco A, Krasnov C. Prueba de estrés con dobutamina. Especificidad y sensibilidad de la monitorización continua y entiempo real del segmento ST en 12 derivacionessimultáneas [Dobutamine stress test. Specificity and sensitivity of continuous ST-segment monitoring in 12 simultaneous standard ECG leads]. Rev EspCardiol. 2002;55(6):616-21. Spanish. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heimdal A, Støylen A, Torp H, Skjaerpe T. Real-time strain rate imaging of the left ventricle by ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11(11):1013-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marwick, TH. Measurement of strain and strain rate by echocardiography: ready for prime time? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Apr 4;47(7):1313-27. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Urheim S, Edvardsen T, Torp H, Angelsen B, Smiseth OA. Myocardial strain by Doppler echocardiography. Validation of a new method to quantify regional myocardial function. Circulation. 2000;102(10):1158-64. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Geyer H, Caracciolo G, Abe H, Wilansky S, Carerj S, Gentile F, et al. Assessment of myocardial mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography: fundamentals and clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(4):351-69; quiz 453-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pislaru C, Abraham TP, Belohlavek M. Strain and strain rate echocardiography. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2002 Sep;17(5):443-54. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pellikka PA, Arruda-Olson A, Chaudhry FA, Chen MH, Marshall JE, Porter TR, Sawada SG. Guidelines for Performance, Interpretation, and Application of Stress Echocardiography in Ischemic Heart Disease: From the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020 Jan;33(1):1-41.e8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bansal M, Jeffriess L, Leano R, Mundy J, Marwick TH. Assessment of myocardial viability at dobutamine echocardiography by deformation analysis using tissue velocity and speckle-tracking. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(2):121-31. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation. 1977;56(5):786-94. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liang HY, Cauduro S, Pellikka P, Wang J, Urheim S, Yang EH, et al. Usefulness of two-dimensional speckle strain for evaluation of left ventricular diastolic deformation in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(12):1581-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choi JO, Cho SW, Song YB, Cho SJ, Song BG, Lee SC, et al. Longitudinal 2D strain at rest predicts the presence of left main and three-vessel coronary artery disease in patients without regional wall motion abnormality. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10(5):695-701. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liel-Cohen N, Tsadok Y, Beeri R, Lysyansky P, Agmon Y, Feinberg MS, et al. A new tool for automatic assessment of segmental wall motion based on longitudinal 2D strain: a multicenter study by the Israeli Echocardiography Research Group. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(1):47-53. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gorcsan J, Tanaka H. Echocardiographic assessment of myocardial strain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1401–13.
- Schinkel AF, Bax JJ, Geleijnse ML, Boersma E, Elhendy A, Roelandt JR, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of ischaemic heart disease: myocardial perfusion imaging or stress echocardiography? Eur Heart J. 2003;24(9):789-800.
- Marwick TH, Kosmala W, Strain Imaging Aplications and Techniques In ASE’s Comprehensive Strain Imaging, 1st ed. ; Marwick TH, Abraham TP, Eds.; Elsevier: Philadelphia, United States of America, 2022; Volume 1, pp. 4–5. [Google Scholar]
- Talib A, Cheese C, Elfgih I, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability: a review of current noninvasive imaging techniques. Int Cardiovascular Forum J. 2014;1:113–7.
- Karolina W, Soesanto AM, KuncoroBRMAS, Ariani R, Rudiktyo E, Sukmawan R. Comparison between Visual Assessment and Longitudinal Strain during Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2023;33(1):17-21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wierzbowska-Drabik K, Miśkowiec D, Kasprzak JD. Systolic longitudinal strain correlates with visual assessment of regional left ventricular function during dobutamine stress echocardiography and discriminates the segments with induced contractility impairment. Echocardiography. 2017;34(7):1020-1028. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Voigt JU, Exner B, Schmiedehausen K, Huchzermeyer C, Reulbach U, Nixdorff U, et al. Strain-rate imaging during dobutamine stress echocardiography provides objective evidence of inducible ischemia. Circulation. 2003;107(16):2120-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ilardi F, Santoro C, Maréchal P, Dulgheru R, Postolache A, Esposito R, et al. Accuracy of global and regional longitudinal strain at peak of dobutamine stress echocardiography to detect significant coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;37(4):1321-1331. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ismail M, Nammas W. Dobutamine-Induced Strain and Strain Rate Predict Viability Following Fibrinolytic Therapy in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2015;2:12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharma A, Sood A, Mittal BR, Vijayvergiya R. Assessment of myocardial viability using echocardiographic strain imaging in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparison with cardiac PET imaging. J Echocardiogr. 2020 Dec;18(4):240-252. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hanafy A,Soliman A, Elsaughier SM, Mansour HE, Salama MK, Gharib S. et al.Potential Prediction of Myocardial Viability Using Strain/Strain Rate at Low Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography on a Segment-by-segment Basis. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2022; 88: 2503-2511.
- Hanekom L, Jenkins C, Jeffries L, Case C, Mundy J, Hawley C, Marwick TH. Incremental value of strain rate analysis as an adjunct to wall-motion scoring for assessment of myocardial viability by dobutamine echocardiography: a follow-up study after revascularization. Circulation. 2005 Dec 20;112(25):3892-900. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wierzbowska-Drabik K, Hamala P, Roszczyk N, Lipiec P, Plewka M, Kręcki R, Kasprzak JD. Feasibility and correlation of standard 2D speckle tracking echocardiography and automated function imaging derived parameters of left ventricular function during dobutamine stress test. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Apr;30(4):729-37. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Clinical characteristics | |
| Age(years) | 65.46 ± 7.58 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.78 ± 1.93 |
| HTA, n (%) | 46(92%) |
| DM, n (%) | 16 (32%) |
| Smoking, n (%) | 9 (18%) |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 12 (26) |
| Echocardiographicparameters | |
| LVEF baseline (%) | 51.68 ± 12.48 |
| GLS baseline (%) | -15.23 ± 9.95 |
| Parameter | Segments with impaired contractility (n=208) | Segments without impaired contractility (n=232) | p |
| Baseline longitudinal strain (%) | -17 (-18 to -17) | -20 (-21 to -18) | < 0.05 |
| Peak longitudinal strain (%) | -13 (-15 to -12) | -22 (-23 to -21) | < 0.05 |
| Changes longitudinal strain (%) | -5 (-6 to -4) | -2 (-1 to-3) | < 0.05 |
| Parameter | Segments with improved contractility (n=208) | Segments without improved contractility (n=232) | P |
| Baseline longitudinal strain (%) | -8 (-11 to -7) | -6 (-8 to -5) | < 0.05 |
| Peak longitudinal strain(%) | -14 (-17 to -13) | -4 (-5 to -3) | < 0.05 |
| Changes longitudinal strain (%) | -6 (-5 to -7) | -2 (-3 to 0) | < 0.05 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).