Submitted:
29 April 2025
Posted:
29 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
I. Introduction
II. Literature Review
III. Hypothesis
A. Hypothesis: Image Segmentation Accuracy
B. Hypothesis: Quality of Generated Images
C. Hypothesis: User Experience and Usability
D. Hypothesis: Usability Testing and Iteration
IV. Methods
A. Making Images By OpenAI’s DALL-E
B. Segmentation Of Images
- Imagine Preprocessing: Before an image can be seg- mented some preprocessing takes place first which uti- lizes Sharp for several image types and different res- olution formats. The images are resized to a smaller resolution for convenience of processing the image.
- Color Extraction and Clustering: The platform in- corporates K-means clustering to derive primary colors within the image. The system creates a basic color palette by reducing the number of colors in an image and customizing its regions. The complexity of the final paint-by-numbers image can be adjusted by changing the number of colors (12 or 24). The algorithm splits the pixels of the image into clusters, each representing a color.
- Vectorization of Image: The platform encourages in- creased image clarity by utilizing potrace and vtracer for vectorization. These techniques enable the generation of vector images from raster images by clearly outlining segments. This greatly assists an individual during the painting stage. For scalable and clear paint-by-number kits, vectorization is vital.
- Edge Detection Segment defining is enhanced using edge segmentation techniques. Such methods improve the boundary contours between areas of different colors, resulting in each segment being simple to paint and distinct in appearance.
C. User Interface:
D. Usability Testing and Iterative Improvements:
V. Results
A. Image Segmentation
B. Quality of Generated Images
C. Evaluation of User Experience and Usability
D. Usability Testing and Iteration
IV. Conclusion
Acknowledgments
References
- R. White, J. Smith, and A. Brown, “The impact of creative hobbies on mental health and stress relief,” J. Psychological Well-being, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 123–135, 2020. [Online]. [CrossRef]
- Y. Zhang, L. Chen, and X. Zhao, “Usability challenges in automated tools for creative design: A review of existing platforms,” J. Human- Comput. Interact., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 432–450, 2019. [Online]. [CrossRef]
- S. Sundararajan, P. Kumar, and M. Jain, “Advances in image seg- mentation: Implications for creative applications,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 30, pp. 5678–5689, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9356353.
- OpenAI, “DALL·E: Creating images from text,” 2023. [Online]. Avail- able: https://openai.com/research/dall-e.
- Wilson, “Accessibility in creative automation software,” Design Tools Rev., pp. 45–52, Jan. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www. designtoolsreview.com/2023/01/accessibility-creative-automation.
- L. Chen, “Artificial intelligence in creative process automation,” AI Appl. J., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 112–125, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://aiaj. org/articles/2023-12-3-ai-creative-automation.
- M. Gupta, “Neural networks for image segmentation,” Image Process. Today, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 34–41, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://imageprocessingtoday.org/neural-networks-segmentation.
- H. Nielsen, “User-centric approaches to software design,” Interact. Design Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 78–92, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://interactiondesignresearch.org/2023/05/user-centric-approaches.
- J. Kim, “The role of customization in user engagement,” Personalization Technol., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 201–215, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://personalizationtech.org/2023/07/customization-engagement.
- T. Roberts, “The cognitive benefits of creative hobbies,” Cognit. De- velop. Stud., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 156–170, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://cogdevstudies.org/2023/09/creative-hobbies.
- S. Patel, “Art therapy and mindfulness in mental health,” J. Mindfulness Wellbeing, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 88–102, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://jmindfulness.org/art-therapy-2023.
- E. Gonzalez, “Cognitive exercises through creative pursuits,” Art Cre- ativity, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 67–79, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://artcreativityjournal.org/cognitive-exercises.
- P. Williams, “The future of digital creativity tools,” Digit. Art J., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 33–47, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://digitalartjournal.org/future-tools-2023.
- R. Lee, “The role of social platforms in creative expression,” Soc. Media & Creativity, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 112–126, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://socialmediacreativity.org/role-of-platforms.
- Sharp Image Processing Library, “Sharp: High performance Node.js im- age processing,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://sharp.pixelplumbing.com/.
- P. Selinger, “Potrace: A polygon-based tracing algorithm,” 2023. [On- line]. Available: http://potrace.sourceforge.net/potrace.pdf.
- VTracer Team, “Raster to vector conversion tool,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.visioncortex.org/vtracer/.
- S. Kaur and P. Singh, “Clustering techniques in color extraction: A review of K-means and its applications,” Int. J. Data Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45–57, 2021. [Online].
- J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993. [Online]. Available: https://www.nngroup.com/books/usability-engineering/.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
