Submitted:
12 April 2025
Posted:
14 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- To examine the role of green entrepreneurship that affects the sustainable development of Maharashtra.
- To determine the impact of innovation, proactiveness, risk tendency, green social, environmental, and economic performance on climate change and environmental issues in startup businesses in Maharashtra.
2. Literature Review
2.1. Related Works:
2.2. Research Gap
2.3. Theoretical Background
2.3.1. Green Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance
2.3.2. Green Performance in Climate Change and Environmental Issues
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Theoretical Framework
3.2. Data Collection and Sample
3.2.1. Sample Description
3.2.2. Measures
3.3. Research Design
3.3.1. Tools
4. Result & Discussion
4.1. Descriptive Statistics
4.2. Measurement of the Model
4.3. Structural Model
4.4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
5.1. Practical, Social, and Theoretical Implications
5.2. Limitation and Future Scope
References
- Yi, G. From green entrepreneurial intentions to green entrepreneurial behaviors: The role of university entrepreneurial support and external institutional support. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2021, 17, 963–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alwakid, W.; Aparicio, S.; Urbano, D. The influence of green entrepreneurship on sustainable development in Saudi Arabia: The role of formal institutions. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021, 18, 5433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Habib, M.A.; Bao, Y.; Ilmudeen, A. The impact of green entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, and green supply chain management practices on sustainable firm performance. Cogent Business & Management, 2020, 7, 1743616. [Google Scholar]
- Tien, N.H.; Hiep, M.; Dai, N.Q.; Duc, N.M.; Hong, T.T.K. Green entrepreneurship understanding in Vietnam. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2020, 24, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Demirel,, Li, Q. C.; Rentocchini, F.; Tamvada, J.P. Born to be green: new insights into the economics and management of green entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 2019, 52, 759–771.
- Nuringsih, K. Role of green entrepreneurship in raising the effect of green value toward sustainable development. International Journal of Economics, 2020, Business, and Entrepreneurship, 3, 117-131.
- Soomro, B.A.; Ghumro, I.A.; Shah, N. Green entrepreneurship inclination among the younger generation: An avenue towards a green economy. Sustainable Development, 2020, 28, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karimi, R.F.; NabaviChashmi, S.A. Designing a green entrepreneurship model in sustainable development consistent with the performance of Tehran industrial towns. Journal of business-to-business marketing, 2019, 26, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domańska, A.; Żukowska, B.; Zajkowski, R. Green entrepreneurship as a connector among social, environmental, and economic pillars of sustainable development. Why some countries are more agile? ProblemyEkorozwoju, 2018, 13, 67–76. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, M.; Dharwal, M. Green entrepreneurship and sustainable development: A conceptual framework. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, 49, 3603–3606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikolaou, E.I.; Ierapetritis, D.; Tsagarakis, K.P. An evaluation of the prospects of green entrepreneurship development using a SWOT analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2011, 18, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Sarkar, A.; Qian, L.; Peau, A.K. Overview of green business practices within the Bangladeshi RMG industry: competitiveness and sustainable development perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27, 22888–22901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Makhloufi, L.; Laghouag, A.A.; Meirun, T.; Belaid, F. Impact of green entrepreneurship orientation on environmental performance: The natural resource-based view and environmental policy perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2022, 31, 425–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ovharhe, O.H.; Okolo, B.S. Sustainable development goals: Lean entrepreneurship and Green entrepreneurship. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 2022, 9, 59–71. [Google Scholar]
- Amankwah, J.; Sesen, H. On the relation between green entrepreneurship intention and behavior. Sustainability, 2021, 13, 7474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mia, M.M.; Rizwan, S.; Zayed, N.M.; Nitsenko, V.; Miroshnyk, O.; Kryshtal, H.; Ostapenko, R. The impact of green entrepreneurship on social change and factors influencing AMO theory. Systems, 2022, 10, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Sun, Y.; Gao, Y. Relationship between green entrepreneurship orientation, integration of opportunity and resource capacities, and sustainable competitive advantage. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13, 1068734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, N.H.; Ahmad, N.H.; Rahman, S.A.; Halim, H.A. Towards a sustainable agenda: Enhancing green entrepreneurship image among manufacturing SMEs. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development 2020, 16, 466–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lotfi, M.; Yousefi, A.; Jafari, S. The effect of the emerging green market on green entrepreneurship and sustainable development in knowledge-based companies. Sustainability, 2018, 10, 2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.H.; Chen, H.C. Critical factors for enhancing green service innovation: Linking green relationship quality and green entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 2018, 9, 188–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diabate, A.; Sibiri, H.; Wang, L.; and Yu, L. Assessing SMEs’ sustainable growth through entrepreneurs’ ability and entrepreneurial orientation: An insight into SMEs in Côte d’Ivoire. Sustainability, 2019, 11, 7149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qazi, W.; Qureshi, J.A.; Raza, S.A.; Khan, K.A.; Qureshi, M.A. Impact of personality traits and university green entrepreneurial support on students' green entrepreneurial intentions: the moderating role of environmental values. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 2020, 13, 1154–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muangmee, C.; Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z.; Meekaewkunchorn, N.; Kassakorn, N.; Khalid, B. Green entrepreneurial orientation and green innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Social Sciences, 2021, 10, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Cao, Q.; Zhuo, C.; Mou, Y.; Pu, Z.; and Zhou, Y. COVID-19 to green entrepreneurial intention: Role of green entrepreneurial self-efficacy, optimism, ecological values, social responsibility, and green entrepreneurial motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12, 732904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yousaf, Z.; Radulescu, M.; Sinisi, C.I.; Serbanescu, L.; Paunescu, L.M. Harmonization of green motives and green business strategies towards sustainable development of hospitality and tourism industry: Green environmental policies. Sustainability, 2021, 13, 6592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasir, N.; Babar, M.; Mehmood, H.S.; Xie, R.; Guo, G. The Environmental Values Play a Role in the Development of Green Entrepreneurship to Achieve Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention. Sustainability, 2023, 15, 6451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carchano, M.; Cardebat, J.M.; Gonzalez, A.; Carrasco, I. Moving toward environmental sustainability through green entrepreneurship: assessing the moderating role of managerial environmental commitment. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 2024, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wernerfelt, B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, W.; Chai, H.; Shao, J.; and Feng, T. Green entrepreneurial orientation for enhancing firm performance: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of cleaner production, 2018, 198, 1311–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirmon, D.G.; Hitt, M.A.; Ireland, R.D.; Gilbert, B.A. Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 2011, 37, 1390–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varanavicius, V.; Navikaite, A. Competitive advantage attainment via synergy in green offices. Journal of International Studies, 2015, 8, 8–3. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, X.; Huo, J.; and Zou, H. Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. Journal of business research, 2019, 101, 697–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asadi, S.; Pourhashemi, S.O.; Nilashi, M.; Abdullah, R.; Samad, S.; Yadegaridehkordi, E.; Aljojo, N.; Razali, N.S. Investigating the influence of green innovation on sustainability performance: A case on Malaysian hotel industry. Journal of cleaner production, 2020, 258, 120860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weng, H.H.; Chen, J.S.; Chen, C. Effects of green innovation on environmental and corporate performance: A stakeholder perspective. Sustainability, 2015, 7, 4997–5026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosenbusch, N.; Brinckmann, J.; Bausch, A. Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 2011, 26, 441–457. [Google Scholar]
- Chiou, T.Y.; Chan, H.K.; Lettice, F.; Chung, S.H. The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, 2011, 47, 822–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elkington, J. Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental quality management, 1998, 8, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asadi, S.; Pourhashemi, S.O.; Nilashi, M.; Abdullah, R.; Samad, S.; Yadegaridehkordi, E.; Aljojo, N.; Razali, N.S. Investigating the influence of green innovation on sustainability performance: A case on Malaysian hotel industry. Journal of cleaner production, 2020, 258, 120860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahrinasari, M.S.; Bangsawan, S. The impact of entrepreneurial and environmental factors on entrepreneurial intention of the banking sector of Indonesia. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 2020, 21.
- Shahzad, M.; Qu, Y.; Zafar, A.U.; Rehman, S.U.; Islam, T. Exploring the influence of knowledge management process on corporate sustainable performance through green innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2020, 24, 2079–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajapathirana, R.J.; Hui, Y. Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2018, 3, 44–55. [Google Scholar]
- Fernando, Y.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Wah, W.X. Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: does service capability matter? Resources, conservation and recycling 2019, 141, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pakurár, M.; Khan, M.A.; Benedek, A.; Oláh, J. The impact of green practices, cooperation, and innovation on the performance of supply chains using the statistical method of meta-analysis. Journal of International Studies (2071-8330), 2020, 13.
- Rodríguez-Antón, J.M.; del Mar Alonso-Almeida, M.; Celemín, M.S.; Rubio, L. Use of different sustainability management systems in the hospitality industry. The case of Spanish hotels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 22, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DiPietro, R.B.; Cao, Y.; Partlow, C. Green practices in upscale foodservice operations: Customer perceptions and purchase intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2013, 25, 779–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dangelico, R.M.; Pujari, D. ; Pontrandolfo,, Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2017, 26, 490–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Yang, F. On the drivers and performance outcomes of green practices adoption: an empirical study in China. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2016, 116, 2011–2034. [Google Scholar]
- Kozubíková, L.; Kubálek, J.; Novotná, A.; Petráková, Z. ; 2023, March. The impact of selected environmental factors on the perception of a company’s financial performance in the SME segment. In Forum Scientiae Oeconomia (Vol. 11, No. 1, 133-148).
- Montabon, F.; Sroufe, R.; Narasimhan, R. An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices, and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25, 998–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Battisti, M.; Perry, M. Walking the talk? Environmental responsibility from the perspective of small-business owners. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2011, 18, 172–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inman, R.A.; Green, K.W. Lean and green combine to impact environmental and operational performance. International Journal of Production Research, 2018, 56, 4802–4818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Virglerová, Z.; Dobeš, K.; Vojtovič, S. The perception of the state’s influence on its business environment in the SMEs from the Czech Republic. Administratiesi Management Public.
- Roca, 2016, L. C.; Searcy, C. An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. Journal of cleaner production, 2012, 20, 103–118.
- Bock, J.; Hasenkamp, H. Innovation through Craftmanship. Management & Marketing, 2013, 8, 451. [Google Scholar]
- Pakurár, M.; Khan, M.A.; Benedek, A.; Oláh, J. The impact of green practices, cooperation, and innovation on the performance of supply chains using the statistical method of meta-analysis. Journal of International Studies (2071-8330), 2020, 13(3).
- Ardia, D.; Bluteau, K.; Boudt, K.; Inghelbrecht, K. 2020. Climate change concerns and the performance of green versus brown stocks. Available at SSRN 371 7722.
- Prudham, S. Pimping climate change: Richard Branson, global warming, and the performance of green capitalism. Environment and Planning A, 2009, 41, 1594–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.S.; Chang, C.H. The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 116, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menguc, B.; Ozanne, L.K. Challenges of the “green imperative”: A natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation–business performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 2005, 58, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lotfi, M.; Yousefi, A.; Jafari, S. The effect of the emerging green market on green entrepreneurship and sustainable development in knowledge-based companies. Sustainability, 2018, 10, 2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saunders, B.; Sim, J.; Kingstone, T.; Baker, S.; Waterfield, J.; Bartlam, B.; Burroughs, H.; Jinks, C. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & quantity, 2018, 52, 1893–1907. [Google Scholar]
- Tze San, O.; Latif, B.; Di Vaio, A. GEO and sustainable performance: the moderating role of GTD and environmental consciousness. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2022, 23, 38–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saeed, A.; Jun, Y.; Nubuor, S.A.; Priyankara, H.P.R.; Jayasuriya, M.P.F. Institutional pressures, green supply chain management practices on environmental and economic performance: A two theory view. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| [Citation] | Method/Analysis | Data Collection | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| [19] | Comprehensive Research Model | Tehran University's Science and Technology Park. | Sustainable development is positively and significantly impacted by green entrepreneurship. |
| [20] | Exploratory Factor Analysis | Energetic and successful Taiwanese hotel businesses | The connection between GEO and GSI is GRQ and has a beneficial impact on GSI. |
| [21] | Confirmatory Factor Analysis | 320 small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) in Ivory | The association between practically all EA aspects and SMESG is positively regulated by proactiveness. |
| [22] | Modeling Partial Least Square Structural Equations. | Students attending Pakistani private universities | The intention to pursue green entrepreneurship is positively and significantly connected with personality attributes. |
| [23] | PLS-SEM Analysis | Thailand's automobile components industry | Positive effects of a green entrepreneurial attitude on green innovation. |
| [24] | Structural Equation Model | 410 Chinese college students | Green entrepreneurial intentions are significantly and favorably impacted by optimism, ecological ideals, and a sense of social duty. |
| [25] | Regression Analysis | 451 top managers and owners oversee 54 hotels in Pakistan, including 5, 4, and 3-star establishments. | Green business strategies as a connection between sustainable growth and environmental goals. |
| [26] | Structural Equation Model | 418 students in Lahore and Faisalabad, Pakistan | Subjective norms were found to have no impact on the intent of sustainable entrepreneurs. |
| [27] | Structural Equation Model | Spanish wine sector | Demand for sustainable products, regulation, and top management's environmental commitment positively influence environmental innovation. |
| Variables | Frequency | Percent | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 283 | 74.7 |
| Female | 96 | 25.3 | |
| Total | 379 | 100.0 | |
| Entrepreneurs Age | 25& below | 61 | 16.1 |
| 26-30 | 158 | 41.7 | |
| 31-40 | 124 | 32.7 | |
| 41-50 | 23 | 6.1 | |
| 50 & above | 13 | 3.4 | |
| Total | 379 | 100.0 | |
| Level of Education | Senior high school | 26 | 6.9 |
| Diploma | 57 | 15.0 | |
| UG | 171 | 45.1 | |
| PG | 87 | 23.0 | |
| Others | 38 | 10.0 | |
| Total | 379 | 100.0 | |
| Business Age | Less than 3 years | 68 | 17.9 |
| 4 to 6 | 155 | 40.9 | |
| 7 to 9 | 86 | 22.7 | |
| More than 10 years | 70 | 18.5 | |
| Total | 379 | 100.0 | |
| Measures | Items | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Green Entrepreneurship | 10 | [44,51,47] |
| Green Social Performance | 4 | [56] |
| Green Economic Performance | 4 | [57] |
| Green Environmental Performance | 4 | [59] |
| Climatic Change and Environmental Issues | 4 | [60] |
| Constructs | Mean | Std. Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Green Entrepreneurship | 3.1166 | .58143 |
| Green social performance | 4.0303 | .62181 |
| Green Economic Performance | 3.9083 | .55158 |
| Green Environmental Performance | 3.8087 | .64730 |
| Climatic Change & Environmental Issues | 3.5752 | .70285 |
| Constructs | Loading of factors | Alpha | CR | AVE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green Entrepreneurship | GE1 | .762 | .850 | 0.792 | .525 |
| GE2 | .674 | ||||
| GE3 | .709 | ||||
| GE4 | .766 | ||||
| GE5 | .795 | ||||
| GE6 | .680 | ||||
| GE7 | .729 | ||||
| GE8 | .671 | ||||
| GE9 | .730 | ||||
| GE10 | .756 | ||||
| Green Social Performance | GSP1 | .773 | .914 | .898 | .688 |
| GSP2 | .814 | ||||
| GSP3 | .789 | ||||
| GSP4 | .679 | ||||
| Green Economic Performance | GEP1 | .638 | .734 | .701 | .770 |
| GEP2 | .553 | ||||
| GEP3 | .582 | ||||
| GEP4 | .733 | ||||
| Green Environmental Performance | GNP1 | .799 | .868 | .850 | .586 |
| GNP2 | .689 | ||||
| GNP3 | .731 | ||||
| GNP4 | .563 | ||||
| Climatic Change and Environmental Issues | CCE1 | .630 | .815 | .991 | 0.881 |
| CCE2 | .757 | ||||
| CCE3 | .802 | ||||
| CCE4 | .825 | ||||
| GSP | CE | GEP | GNP | CCE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSP | 0.829 | ||||
| CE | 0.972 | 0.774 | |||
| GEP | 1.018 | 0.986 | 0.608 | ||
| GNP | 0.701 | 0.708 | 0.940 | 0.766 | |
| CCE | 0.684 | 0.746 | 0.993 | 1.023 | 9.530 |
| Categories | Acceptance Level | Obtained Value | Fitness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute Fit | |||
| CMIN/Df | P < 0.05 | 0.000 | Significant |
| GFI (Goodness of Fit) | ≥ 0.7 satisfactory fit, ≥ 0.8 perfect fit, ≥ 0.9 excellent fit | 0.814 | Perfect fit |
| Incremental Fit | |||
| AGFI (Adjusted GFI) | ≥ 0.7 satisfactory fit, ≥ 0.8 perfect fit, ≥ 0.9 excellent fit | 0.724 | Satisfactory fit |
| NFI (Normal Fit Index) | ≥ 0.7 satisfactory fit, ≥ 0.8 perfect fit, ≥ 0.9 excellent fit | 0.840 | Perfect fit |
| Parsimonious Fit | |||
| PNFI (Parsimonious Normed Fit Index) | 0.50 or 0.60 above | 0.628 | Satisfactory fit |
| CFI (Comparative Fit Index) | ≥ 0.7 satisfactory fit, ≥ 0.8 perfect fit, ≥ 0.9 excellent fit | 0.865 | Perfect fit |
| TLI (Tucker-Lewis Coefficient) | ≥ 0.7 satisfactory fit, ≥ 0.8 perfect fit, ≥ 0.9 excellent fit | 0.815 | Perfect fit |
| Hypothesis | Beta | t | P value | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | GE ←→GSP | .476 | 10.501 | .000 | Accepted |
| H2 | GE ←→GEP | .522 | 11.895 | .000 | Accepted |
| H3 | GE ←→GNP | .369 | 7.710 | .000 | Accepted |
| H4 | GSP ←→ CCE | .198 | 3.223 | .001 | Accepted |
| H5 | GEP ←→ CCE | .202 | 2.573 | .010 | Accepted |
| H6 | GNP ←→ CCE | .284 | 4.558 | .000 | Accepted |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).