Submitted:
03 April 2025
Posted:
03 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Raw Material
2.2. Pretreatment and Press Juice Preparation
2.3. Microbial Reduction Methods
2.4. Microorganism, Preculture
2.5. Preparation of Media and Agar Plate
2.6. Optimization Experiments in Shake Flasks
2.7. Analytical Methods
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Parameter Optimization for Fermentation
3.1.1. Optimizing Microbial Reduction Methods for Fermentation
3.1.2. Optimizing Press Juice Dilution Ratios for Fermentation
3.1.3. Optimizing Temperature for Fermentation
3.2. Effects of Press Juice Supplementation on K. marxianus Growth Rate, Biomass Yield, and Substrate Consumption
3.3. Effect of Lolium perenne Varieties and Harvest Time on SCP Production
3.4. Evaluation of Field Yield and Harvest Timing Effects on SCP Production in Different Lolium perenne Varieties
| Samples | Field Yield [t WM·ha-1] |
Press Juice Yield* [m3·ha-1] |
Maximum biomass concentration [g·L-1] | Biomass yield [kg·ha-1] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ExplosionE | 15.9 ± 1.9 | 6.8 ± 0.8 | 16.62 ± 0.49 | 113.3 ± 13.9 |
| ExplosionL | 16.9 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.2 | 15.05 ± 0.90 | 109.3 ± 7.1 |
| HonrosoE | 12.3 ± 0.2 | 5.3 ± 0.1 | 15.32 ±0.23 | 81.0 ± 1.8 |
| HonrosoL | 14.2 ± 0.2 | 6.1 ± 0.3 | 13.79 ± 0.49 | 84.3 ± 4.8 |
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgment
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Edwardson, W.; Lewis, C.W.; Slesser, M. Energy and Environmental Implications of Novel Protein Production Systems. Agriculture and Environment 1981, 6, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najafpour, G.D. Single-Cell Protein. In Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology; Elsevier, 2015; pp. 417–434 ISBN 978-0-444-63357-6.
- Suman, G.; Nupur, M.; Anuradha, S.; Pradeep, B. Single Cell Protein Production: A Review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences (IJCMAS) 2015, 4, 251–262. [Google Scholar]
- Sekoai, P.T.; Roets-Dlamini, Y.; O’Brien, F.; Ramchuran, S.; Chunilall, V. Valorization of Food Waste into Single-Cell Protein: An Innovative Technological Strategy for Sustainable Protein Production. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tropea, A.; Ferracane, A.; Albergamo, A.; Potortì, A.G.; Lo Turco, V.; Di Bella, G. Single Cell Protein Production through Multi Food-Waste Substrate Fermentation. Fermentation 2022, 8, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bajpai, P. Single Cell Protein Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass; SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2017; ISBN 978-981-10-5872-1. [Google Scholar]
- Serra, A.-A.; Couée, I.; Heijnen, D.; Michon-Coudouel, S.; Sulmon, C.; Gouesbet, G. Genome-Wide Transcriptional Profiling and Metabolic Analysis Uncover Multiple Molecular Responses of the Grass Species Lolium Perenne Under Low-Intensity Xenobiotic Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bocian, A.; Kosmala, A.; Rapacz, M.; Jurczyk, B.; Marczak, Ł.; Zwierzykowski, Z. Differences in Leaf Proteome Response to Cold Acclimation between Lolium Perenne Plants with Distinct Levels of Frost Tolerance. Journal of Plant Physiology 2011, 168, 1271–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Waldron, K.W. Advances in Biorefineries: Biomass and Waste Supply Chain Exploitation; Woodhead Publishing series in Energy; Elsevier/Woodhead Publishing: Amsterdam Boston, 2014; ISBN 978-0-85709-521-3. [Google Scholar]
- Koschuh, W.; Povoden, G.; Thang, V.H.; Kromus, S.; Kulbe, K.D.; Novalin, S.; Krotscheck, C. Production of Leaf Protein Concentrate from Ryegrass (Lolium Perenne x Multiflorum) and Alfalfa (Medicago Sauva Subsp. Sativa). Comparison between Heat Coagulation/Centrifugation and Ultrafiltration. Desalination 2004, 163, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özköse, A.; Arslan, D.; Acar, A. The Comparison of the Chemical Composition, Sensory, Phenolic and Antioxidant Properties of Juices from Different Wheatgrass and Turfgrass Species. Not Bot Horti Agrobo 2016, 44, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fonseca, G.G.; Heinzle, E.; Wittmann, C.; Gombert, A.K. The Yeast Kluyveromyces Marxianus and Its Biotechnological Potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2008, 79, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonel, L.V.; Arruda, P.V.; Chandel, A.K.; Felipe, M.G.A.; Sene, L. Kluyveromyces Marxianus : A Potential Biocatalyst of Renewable Chemicals and Lignocellulosic Ethanol Production. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 2021, 41, 1131–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilal, M.; Ji, L.; Xu, Y.; Xu, S.; Lin, Y.; Iqbal, H.M.N.; Cheng, H. Bioprospecting Kluyveromyces Marxianus as a Robust Host for Industrial Biotechnology. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 851768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schwan, R.F.; Rose, A.H. Polygalacturonase Production by Kluyveromyces Marxianus: Effect of Medium Composition. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 1994, 76, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Struyf, N.; Vandewiele, H.; Herrera-Malaver, B.; Verspreet, J.; Verstrepen, K.J.; Courtin, C.M. Kluyveromyces Marxianus Yeast Enables the Production of Low FODMAP Whole Wheat Breads. Food Microbiology 2018, 76, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koukoumaki, D.I.; Papanikolaou, S.; Ioannou, Z.; Mourtzinos, I.; Sarris, D. Single-Cell Protein and Ethanol Production of a Newly Isolated Kluyveromyces Marxianus Strain through Cheese Whey Valorization. Foods 2024, 13, 1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, J.S.S.; Bezawada, J.; Ajila, C.M.; Yan, S.; Tyagi, R.D.; Surampalli, R.Y. Mixed Culture of Kluyveromyces Marxianus and Candida Krusei for Single-Cell Protein Production and Organic Load Removal from Whey. Bioresource Technology 2014, 164, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Silva, D.D.V.; De Arruda, P.V.; Vicente, F.M.C.F.; Sene, L.; Da Silva, S.S.; Das Graças De Almeida Felipe, M. Evaluation of Fermentative Potential of Kluyveromyces Marxianus ATCC 36907 in Cellulosic and Hemicellulosic Sugarcane Bagasse Hydrolysates on Xylitol and Ethanol Production. Ann Microbiol 2015, 65, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meier, U. Growth Stages of Mono- and Dicotyledonous Plants: BBCH Monograph. 2018. [CrossRef]
- Varriale, L.; Hengsbach, J.-N.; Guo, T.; Kuka, K.; Tippkötter, N.; Ulber, R. Sustainable Production of Lactic Acid Using a Perennial Ryegrass as Feedstock—A Comparative Study of Fermentation at the Bench- and Reactor-Scale, and Ensiling. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, M.; Xiong, S.; Chen, F.; Geladi, P.; Eilertsen, L.; Myronycheva, O.; Lestander, T.A.; Thyrel, M. Energy Smart Hot-Air Pasteurisation as Effective as Energy Intense Autoclaving for Fungal Preprocessing of Lignocellulose Feedstock for Bioethanol Fuel Production. Renewable Energy 2020, 155, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, S.; Martín, C.; Eilertsen, L.; Wei, M.; Myronycheva, O.; Larsson, S.H.; Lestander, T.A.; Atterhem, L.; Jönsson, L.J. Energy-Efficient Substrate Pasteurisation for Combined Production of Shiitake Mushroom (Lentinula Edodes) and Bioethanol. Bioresource Technology 2019, 274, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DSMZ GmbH UNIVERSAL MEDIUM FOR YEASTS (YM) 2007.
- Winkler, K.; Socher, M.L. Shake Flask Technology. In Encyclopedia of Industrial Biotechnology; Wiley, 2014; pp. 1–16 ISBN 978-0-471-79930-6.
- Matlock, B.C.; Beringer, R.W.; Ash, D.; Allen, M.; Page, A.F. Analyzing Differences in Bacterial Optical Density Measurements between Spectrophotometers.; 2011.
- Canale, A.; Valente, M.E.; Ciotti, A. Determination of Volatile Carboxylic Acids (C1 –C5i ) and Lactic Acid in Aqueous Acid Extracts of Silage by High Performance Liquid Chromatography. J Sci Food Agric 1984, 35, 1178–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tix, J.; Moll, F.; Krafft, S.; Betsch, M.; Tippkötter, N. Hydrogen Production from Enzymatic Pretreated Organic Waste with Thermotoga Neapolitana. Energies 2024, 17, 2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myers, J.A.; Curtis, B.S.; Curtis, W.R. Improving Accuracy of Cell and Chromophore Concentration Measurements Using Optical Density. BMC Biophys 2013, 6, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rocha, S.; Coimbra, M.; Delgadillo, I. Occurrence of Furfuraldehydes during the Processing of Quercus Suber L. Cork. Simultaneous Determination of Furfural, 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural and 5-Methylfurfural and Their Relation with Cork Polysaccharides. Carbohydrate Polymers 2004, 56, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.L.; Slininger, P.J.; Dien, B.S.; Berhow, M.A.; Kurtzman, C.P.; Gorsich, S.W. Adaptive Response of Yeasts to Furfural and 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural and New Chemical Evidence for HMF Conversion to 2,5-Bis-Hydroxymethylfuran. J IND MICROBIOL BIOTECHNOL 2004, 31, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baptista, M.; Cunha, J.T.; Domingues, L. Establishment of Kluyveromyces Marxianus as a Microbial Cell Factory for Lignocellulosic Processes: Production of High Value Furan Derivatives. JoF 2021, 7, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rugthaworn, P.; Murata, Y.; Machida, M.; Apiwatanapiwat, W.; Hirooka, A.; Thanapase, W.; Dangjarean, H.; Ushiwaka, S.; Morimitsu, K.; Kosugi, A.; et al. Growth Inhibition of Thermotolerant Yeast, Kluyveromyces Marxianus, in Hydrolysates from Cassava Pulp. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2014, 173, 1197–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliva, J.M.; Ballesteros, I.; Negro, M.J.; Manzanares, P.; Cabanas, A.; Ballesteros, M. Effect of Binary Combinations of Selected Toxic Compounds on Growth and Fermentation of Kluyveromyces Marxianus. Biotechnol. Prog. 2004, 20, 715–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grba, S.; Stehlik-Tomas, V.; Stanzer, D.; Vahčić, N.; Škrlin, A. Selection of Yeast Strain Kluyveromyces Marxianus for Alcohol and Biomass Production on Whey. Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly 2002, 16, 13–16. [Google Scholar]
- Sampaio, J.P.; Spencer-Martins, I. Adaptive Growth at High Temperatures of the Lactose-fermenting Yeast Kluyveromyces Marxianus Var. Marxianus. J. Basic Microbiol. 1989, 29, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocha, S.N.; Abrahão-Neto, J.; Gombert, A.K. Physiological Diversity within the Kluyveromyces Marxianus Species. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2011, 100, 619–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Variety | Ploidy | Breeding companies (Country) |
BBCH | harvest time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arvicola | 4x | Freudenberger (Germany) |
65 | 03.06.2022 | |
| Honroso | 2x | DSV (Germany) |
31 | early cut (E) | 17.05.2022 |
| 41 | late cut (L) | 31.05.2022 | |||
| Explosion | 4x | DSV (Germany) |
31 | early cut (E) | 17.05.2022 |
| 41 | late cut (L) | 31.05.2022 | |||
| abbreviation | Samples | Pressjuice dilution | Substance concentration |
|---|---|---|---|
| PJ | Pressjuice | Diluted 1:2 with deionized water | - |
| PJ-Y | Pressjuice + Yeast extract |
Yeast extract 3 g·L-1 | |
| PJ-P | Pressjuice + Peptone |
Peptone 5 g·L-1 | |
| PJ-G | Pressjuice + Glucose |
Glucose 10 g·L-1 | |
| PJ-YP | Pressjuice + Yeast extract + Peptone |
Yeast extract 3 g·L-1 Peptone 5 g·L-1 |
|
| PJ-YPG | Pressjuice + Yeast extract + Peptone + Glucose |
Yeast extract 3 g·L-1 Peptone 5 g·L-1 Glucose 10 g·L-1 |
| Samples | Growth rate [h-1] |
Maximum biomass concentration [g·L-1] | Increase in biomass |
|---|---|---|---|
| PJ | 0.490 | 9.42 | - |
| PJ-Y | 0.511 | 10.47 | 11% |
| PJ-P | 0.512 | 10.25 | 8.8% |
| PJ-G | 0.479 | 11.58 | 23% |
| PJ-YP | 0.497 | 11.80 | 25% |
| PJ-YPG | 0.422 | 16.00 | 71% |
| Samples | Growth rate [h-1] |
Maximum biomass concentration [g·L-1] | biomass yield coefficient [g·g-1] |
|---|---|---|---|
| ExplosionE | 0.483 | 16.62 ± 0.49 | 0.996 ± 0.049 |
| ExplosionL | 0.482 | 15.05 ± 0.90 | 1.174 ± 0.102 |
| HonrosoE | 0.433 | 15.32 ±0.23 | 0.958 ± 0.038 |
| HonrosoL | 0.429 | 13.79 ± 0.49 | 1.199 ± 0.060 |
| YM- Media | 0.460 | 5.22 ± 0.17 | 0.5100.030 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).